Totally incompetent lawyers. Nobody seems to know anything. Simple facts should be 1) The property mortgaged with relevant details like, address, description, name of owner etc. 2) Who had mortgaged that property and when? This case could have been sorted in five minutes but the lawyer instead of stating facts just seems to know one word ' Mlord'. God help
In my college days, I had regularly attended the 226 court in High court of Bombey now Mumbai. Honourable judges always made it a point to understand the case in proper perspective and put the easy questions to new lawyers. Lawyers never felt that they were sidelined or their point was not understood by the bench. It is a privilege to practice in Mumbai highcourt but to practice before constitutional bench i.e. Article 226 natters was real privilege in 70s and 80s. I remembered those hearings while watching this video because Madam Judge is taking all the trouble to know the facts and making it easy for the petitioner's counsel by putting him simple questions. If he answers all the questions correctly, his case will stand. That was one of the main reasons why Mumbai high court was as prestigious as Supreme court.
the skills of this lawyer to explain his part of the story is amazing. this is the type of idiot who would take 16 hours to explain how to boil water and still leave all his students confused. So in this case the father - son duo, mortgaged their property with a bank and then sold it to party B without any documents. Now party B is filing a case in the court saying the bank cannot take the property because it belongs to him even though he does not have the deed. The judge should jail this party B. His lawyer should also be jailed just cos he took 1 hour to explain what I typed. Maybe jail will improve his IQ
Same type of fraud happened with my (ancestral) property also, loan was given before 2000 means 24 years ago. 4 banks were given the loans to fraud companies, by having the fake documents of my (mother's) property. Canara Bank itself said to court as their property documents are fake, but still they are fighting in the court. I have lost about 25 lakhs, i sold one of my property to pay the advocates fee.
7:48 title deed is deposited (with bank) in 1958, then bank should have that original document with them; N. B. :- my doubt is that the bank didn't visited the property while giving the loan.
Nonsense. Why do people give bribe if they r genuine borrower. This advocate is hand in gloves with the borrower and is not able to give answers properly
@rpandurangan7164 , pls try to understand below points Petitioner is the son of the borrower His father and his father's partner took a loan with a property that has registered under his father's name but In the title dead there is a mistake about property description to what actually the property looks like So officially bank would reject such property and ask for rectification of title dead and apply for loan but then bank officials could have taken bribe or did a genuine mistake of not visiting the property and trusted loan applicants and approved it back then. Now title dead is with bank But if u check the description of the land, it doesn't match with the actual land as there is some mismatch And defendent doesn't have title deed also thats the reason he didnt object for earlier order when asked , his advocate wants some time before bank take the land so that he can create a fresh registration via sketch survey and take the land back Let me know if u have any queries
Bank has given my Father's FDs after his death to my sister without taking my consent, rbi rules asking for legal heirs to jointly get FDs of deceased Father is not followed, what should I do?
You can file a Suit in court under the Hindu Succession Act and request for equal sharing of assets of your late father and the FDs will be part of this partition
@krsubramanian6637 bank is not sharing information officially, though bank manager says fraud committed by State bank of Mysore in 2006, SBI says it is merged bank, they have no details. Bank manager statement of my father account shows my father died in 2006, his FDs were operative till 2013.
if your sister is the nominee to the FD, then there was no lapse from the bank side. she only has to produce the death certificate and ID proofs to get the amount. If there was no nominee mentioned, then legal heir certificate and no objection certificate from you has to be submitted to transfer the amount to your sister. If there is no Will, then all the legal heirs have equal share in the amount. go with legal proceedings.
@@jithinkn285 now bank says no nominee, sister said nominee is there, there is no will of father, FD of father was operational till 2013. Sister claims as 15 years over, nothing can be done as limitation. Bank manager says fraud but is not giving in writing.
Sometimes some lawyers will come to court, shout and do drama to convince their client to get more fees even though they fully well know that the case has no chance !!!. This lawyer knew fully well he doesn't stand a chance because his client was a fool. There are PPL who buy litigation property for dirt price and keep the matter it in court for years while enjoying the benefits (which will be many times.over their investment). They don't pay high and have some average lawyer to prolong the case. So in nutshell there more to this than what meets the eye and am not a lawyer 😅
Comment #2 : if blockchain was used in this case and the hon judge had access to that via a system, in a jiffy this case would be dismissed and so would many benamies who hoard ill gotten wealth of rich and powerful. That's why blockchain isn't used in property registration 😇.
Nirmala sitharaman have collected 22,000 + crores from who has fleed from our country like nirvan, Modi Vijay Mallya and chokse out of which 14,500 crores belong to Vijay Mallya
Why hindi? If it's hindi all hindi speakers don't need to learn another language while the rest of India should but if it's English all Indians will equally have to learn a new language and that's what's fair! Besides English is a universal language will need it either way!
Totally incompetent lawyers. Nobody seems to know anything. Simple facts should be
1) The property mortgaged with relevant details like, address, description, name of owner etc.
2) Who had mortgaged that property and when?
This case could have been sorted in five minutes but the lawyer instead of stating facts just seems to know one word ' Mlord'. God help
Yeah, but not in India. All govt offices will contribute to this confusion.
I think he is Intentionally hiding the actual facts.
The lawyer is so unprofessional who has not done his homework
Judge mam is soo humble and ready to hear 🎉
1:11 when judge is asking 'who are you', the answer from advocate is expecting 'the name of client/petitioner' to whom he is representing.
Petitioner’s advocate is not able to say to whom he is representing
Are these the type of people representing us in a court. Even God will get confused by his presentation.
I pity the Judge.. How did these guys pass the law exams?
In my college days, I had regularly attended the 226 court in High court of Bombey now Mumbai.
Honourable judges always made it a point to understand the case in proper perspective and put the easy questions to new lawyers.
Lawyers never felt that they were sidelined or their point was not understood by the bench. It is a privilege to practice in Mumbai highcourt but to practice before constitutional bench i.e. Article 226 natters was real privilege in 70s and 80s.
I remembered those hearings while watching this video because Madam Judge is taking all the trouble to know the facts and making it easy for the petitioner's counsel by putting him simple questions. If he answers all the questions correctly, his case will stand.
That was one of the main reasons why Mumbai high court was as prestigious as Supreme court.
Canara bank would have lost the original documents as they do with other customers.
the skills of this lawyer to explain his part of the story is amazing. this is the type of idiot who would take 16 hours to explain how to boil water and still leave all his students confused. So in this case the father - son duo, mortgaged their property with a bank and then sold it to party B without any documents. Now party B is filing a case in the court saying the bank cannot take the property because it belongs to him even though he does not have the deed. The judge should jail this party B. His lawyer should also be jailed just cos he took 1 hour to explain what I typed. Maybe jail will improve his IQ
That is the ill fate of the Advocacy of some lawyers, even you have explained the facts in a short para clearly.
Good.. you are fit to be a qualified judge.
Petitioner Councel has to appear before the court by well prepared .... He is not clear in explaining his greivance .... He is most unproffessional
Same type of fraud happened with my (ancestral) property also, loan was given before 2000 means 24 years ago. 4 banks were given the loans to fraud companies, by having the fake documents of my (mother's) property.
Canara Bank itself said to court as their property documents are fake, but still they are fighting in the court. I have lost about 25 lakhs, i sold one of my property to pay the advocates fee.
7:48 title deed is deposited (with bank) in 1958, then bank should have that original document with them;
N. B. :- my doubt is that the bank didn't visited the property while giving the loan.
@@kavishwarmokal124 exactly, seems they didn't visit, if they did this loan would not have approved
The lawyer can only say “malord, malord”
Advocate is an idiot who can't understand what the judge is asking ..
just like the first day in school😂😂😂
👍💯
dude don't even have the deed. Intentional mistake to prolong the case and earn money.
The lawyer was not able to even state his problem.
The Lawyer was so Unprofessional
He knew the problem, but he just wants to confuse and get protection of property, even though he knew his won't stand a chance
I adore the learned judge Amrita ji. Great judge.
If this is the level of argument that happens in court, then god save people of india.
Dumb idiots arguing in a language which is making them dumbest.
He couldn't argue because he had no substance in the case . He knew that he is misleading the court.
This is what happens when bank officially take bribe and approve a loan , petitioner is played well
Nonsense. Why do people give bribe if they r genuine borrower. This advocate is hand in gloves with the borrower and is not able to give answers properly
@rpandurangan7164 , pls try to understand below points
Petitioner is the son of the borrower
His father and his father's partner took a loan with a property that has registered under his father's name but In the title dead there is a mistake about property description to what actually the property looks like
So officially bank would reject such property and ask for rectification of title dead and apply for loan but then bank officials could have taken bribe or did a genuine mistake of not visiting the property and trusted loan applicants and approved it back then.
Now title dead is with bank
But if u check the description of the land, it doesn't match with the actual land as there is some mismatch
And defendent doesn't have title deed also thats the reason he didnt object for earlier order when asked , his advocate wants some time before bank take the land so that he can create a fresh registration via sketch survey and take the land back
Let me know if u have any queries
@@anemsumanthBut judge didn't extend protection to the petitioner. Wonder what happened in this case.
@@wahiditsme oh, thanks for sharing
He may be co obligant to the loan,the advocate for private respondent could not explain the status of his client in the loan transaction
Petitioner has the point, but took a wrong approach or intentionally diverting.
How many freaking times "my lord" ? When u start, say it once and end of story.
How do you get these videos? Could you share weblink where they are streamed?
Bank has given my Father's FDs after his death to my sister without taking my consent, rbi rules asking for legal heirs to jointly get FDs of deceased Father is not followed, what should I do?
You can file a Suit in court under the Hindu Succession Act and request for equal sharing of assets of your late father and the FDs will be part of this partition
@krsubramanian6637 bank is not sharing information officially, though bank manager says fraud committed by State bank of Mysore in 2006, SBI says it is merged bank, they have no details. Bank manager statement of my father account shows my father died in 2006, his FDs were operative till 2013.
@@savithakl7577 Apply under RTI Act and ask about details. They will have back up data
if your sister is the nominee to the FD, then there was no lapse from the bank side. she only has to produce the death certificate and ID proofs to get the amount. If there was no nominee mentioned, then legal heir certificate and no objection certificate from you has to be submitted to transfer the amount to your sister. If there is no Will, then all the legal heirs have equal share in the amount. go with legal proceedings.
@@jithinkn285 now bank says no nominee, sister said nominee is there, there is no will of father, FD of father was operational till 2013. Sister claims as 15 years over, nothing can be done as limitation. Bank manager says fraud but is not giving in writing.
Sometimes some lawyers will come to court, shout and do drama to convince their client to get more fees even though they fully well know that the case has no chance !!!. This lawyer knew fully well he doesn't stand a chance because his client was a fool. There are PPL who buy litigation property for dirt price and keep the matter it in court for years while enjoying the benefits (which will be many times.over their investment). They don't pay high and have some average lawyer to prolong the case. So in nutshell there more to this than what meets the eye and am not a lawyer 😅
What happened in the end?
There is no end in court cases for at least a decade
Tarik
@@yalpewscorrect
All are beating about the bush
Why he chanting my lord my lord
A common disease afflicting the legal profession.😊
Local language -buttering the @$$
Only that one word can run the entire show
How.many mi.lords
Which youtuber to fight own case in Court
Comment #2 : if blockchain was used in this case and the hon judge had access to that via a system, in a jiffy this case would be dismissed and so would many benamies who hoard ill gotten wealth of rich and powerful. That's why blockchain isn't used in property registration 😇.
Nirav Modi/ Vijay Malya/ Sahara Owner/ Adani Inke loan squash hote he,
Playing with the Feeling of Poor People to please the Riches
Vijay Mallya paid 14000 cr to banks.
Nirmala sitharaman have collected 22,000 + crores from who has fleed from our country like nirvan, Modi Vijay Mallya and chokse out of which 14,500 crores belong to Vijay Mallya
@@Dimitrivladimir-c1b And waived off 15 lakh crore as per Rajya Sabha answer by her
Ye log english kyu use karte he
If we are indian there should be a common language for practice for every one in hindi...why english is use...
Why in Hindi why not Telugu or Tamil 🤔
In every state you can speak the local language or in English especially in high court
English is ok I have no bias hindi is not universal language
Why hindi? If it's hindi all hindi speakers don't need to learn another language while the rest of India should but if it's English all Indians will equally have to learn a new language and that's what's fair! Besides English is a universal language will need it either way!
"if we are Indian" are you implying all non hindi speakers are not Indians? It's this attitude that the rest of India hates!
2 idiotic lawyers