Storm Shadow: Ukraine's Deadly New Cruise Missile

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Explore the capabilities and history of this long-range attack missile used in conflicts worldwide. Watch now!
    Got a beard? Good. I've got something for you: beardblaze.com
    Simon's Social Media:
    Twitter: / simonwhistler
    Instagram: / simonwhistler
    Love content? Check out Simon's other TH-cam Channels:
    Biographics: / @biographics
    Geographics: / @geographicstravel
    Warographics: / @warographics643
    SideProjects: / @sideprojects
    Into The Shadows: / intotheshadows
    TopTenz: / toptenznet
    Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
    Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
    Business Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
    Casual Criminalist: / thecasualcriminalist
    Decoding the Unknown: / @decodingtheunknown2373

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @haakke
    @haakke 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +550

    last time i was this early russia still had tanks

    • @carlthor91
      @carlthor91 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Emphasis on 'had', a lot, and I mean alot are history.😂

    • @haterhayder
      @haterhayder 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      ​@@carlthor91yes that was the joke

    • @Fairly_Epic
      @Fairly_Epic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Last time I was that early we had an unplanned pregnancy.

    • @user-qw2qm5hw4x
      @user-qw2qm5hw4x 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You mean Ukraine? Because they're the one who are begging for tanks. Western junk tanks got rekt before even firing a shot 😂

    • @redred7289
      @redred7289 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      That burn is hotter than the inside of a T-72 that's been hit by a Javelin.

  • @valentyn.kostiuk
    @valentyn.kostiuk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

    UK, thank you for your support! Amount of your help can not be overestimated. You are saving lives!
    Special gratitude should be said to your volunteers! You are unbelievable people and our heroes.

    • @BillScott-ux4te
      @BillScott-ux4te 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Thank you for saying so 😊😊 from all of the UK "we love you Ukraine"

    • @newblackdog7827
      @newblackdog7827 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      🇺🇦 🇬🇧✌🏻

    • @alancarr9499
      @alancarr9499 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      As UK born and bread Scotland I support all we do for Ukraine hard times for us or not 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧🇺🇦

    • @suprarcjpop545
      @suprarcjpop545 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And the rest of the world dont care about Ukraine.

    • @FlattardiansSuck
      @FlattardiansSuck 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have personally donated enough to buy our Ukraine brothers and sisters 2 drones. I thought long and hard about what my money was going to amount to...deaths most likely. Then I asked how would I feel if my country was invaded, I was battling to survive against invaders, and how much appreciation and respect I would have for someone on the other side of the world to help me defend and keep my homeland.
      No brainer.
      I paid a little to make sure it was legit, and after realising it was and my contact was real, I sent enough to pay for 2 overall. Im not rich, well off, or even doing great....
      But if you sit back and don't help, you are a failure as a human.
      Stand with your family, friends, or even defending a stranger in distress?? Absolutely 100%, even though I may not know them directly. Because I believe in good people.
      Russia and the lying pig Putin.... he lied about his intent, then blames Ukraine, like the weak little worm he is.

  • @chriswoodend2036
    @chriswoodend2036 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    With the FC/ASW due to come in, perhaps France and the UK need to clear out some missile storage space. I hear Kyiv has very reasonable storage rates for several hundred missiles.

    • @Elkarlo77
      @Elkarlo77 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It would be nice if my Country Germany sees the writing on the wall and would clear out their Taurus Stocks. It's an improved Version of Storm Shadow builded by a partnership between Saab and MBDA, with 350km range. We got 600 of them, 150 operational. I would like to see that we refurbish 150 of the 450 reserve Taurus for domestic security and give the 150 operational Taurus to Ukraine. The Interface would be similar and i can't imagine what Target lays at 270km range behind the frontline which would be suddenly in the range of Bunkebuster Warheads *cought* Kertsch-Bridge *cought*

    • @VajrahahaShunyata
      @VajrahahaShunyata 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are a handful of other nations that can do the same.
      Diese idee sind echt nicht schlact.
      Warum wartet alle ?
      Was glauben Sie?

    • @jgw9990
      @jgw9990 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@Elkarlo77 150 of 600 operational. Now that's peak German military. Yes we have hundreds of equipment, and maybe 1/4 works, maybe if we bought enough spares and the contractor isn't suing us.

    • @Elkarlo77
      @Elkarlo77 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jgw9990 The 450 are Hulls in storage, it would need more money to keep them ready and loaded. So they are without explosive Warhead, which would be needed to be replaced after 10 years anyway. The 150 operational are with warheads, are checked regularly, batteries swapped etc. I would argue that the 450 are in better shape then the 150 operationals. But the stored needs to be armed, equipped etc. This Missles are miniature Airplanes. As an Example: The US has now Problems delivering the JDAM-ER Bombs for Himars. Because the Rocket Boosters they want to use are to old and have to be checked. It is easier to have unarmed unequipped Ammunition Hulls laying around then equipped ones. Giving Ukraine the 150 operational Cruise Missles and then ready another 150 from Storage would be even good for the Bundeswehr. When i served 1998 i got a G3 from 1962, it was one of the best rifles, it came straight from the depots literally directly from H&K, while others had newer ones, which had seen hundreds of recruits shooting with it. I could easily hit 9's and 10's on 300 Meter with a tight grouping. In the end the Group of Rifles from the Depot was used for the qualification shooting for the others and they were marked for the Christmas Shooting of the officers. (lot of extra cleaning 😞 ) The same goes for the Leopard 2: Only 150 of 300 are operational, because the other 150 are for the Reserve units. They are not kept in a ready state, as it would cost lot of money and needs lot of Manpower, but of course the News sounds better: "Germany has 300 Leopard 2, only 120 Leopard 2 are combat ready. Makes a better headline than: "Out of 150 active Leopard 2, 30 are in need of repairs." A Tank in Reserve has it's fluids drained and is most likely wax coated, at least we did it in the 90's. Which means to reactivate it you need around 2-3 Days 4 Man working on it, more likely 1 Week.

  • @thecommunistblackhole7717
    @thecommunistblackhole7717 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +215

    Small correction: Russia's missile stats are often measured in range of the missile added to the range of the delivery platform, rather than just the missile. That means the Kaliber missile has a much smaller range. Im sure your writer for this episode found the stat of something along the lines of 2000-3000km and went with the conservative estimate. That variation is to account for different delivery systems.
    Otherwise great video, love all your channels :)

    • @Akm72
      @Akm72 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Using that method Tornado GR.4 + Stormshadow would have a range of roughly 1900 to 2000km (assuming a range of roughly 1600 to 1700km for the Tornado GR.4 with two 2250 liter drop tanks and a range of the missile of at least 250km but probably closer to 400km).
      Typhoon + Stormshadow would have a range of at least 1350 but probably 1500km (assuming a range of Typhoon with a single 1000 liter drop tank of about 1100km).

    • @Alex-ve1og
      @Alex-ve1og 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Akm72 That gives Ukraine a range of ~900km for the Stormshadow since the SU24 has a combat range of 615km when carrying a payload of 3000kg when fit with a drop tank, allowing it to carry 2 Stormshadows on a single mission.

    • @black8art
      @black8art 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's a great observation! What if future UK specs added that aspect to OUR publicity? I'm sure it would scare any potential enemy from escalating, much the same as the "nuclear deterrent" does now?

    • @everypitchcounts4875
      @everypitchcounts4875 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The US army is working on some next generation missiles for HIMARS type of platform. Its mid-range missile program says 1500km and its long range missile program might be pushing 2800km

    • @LeeXRV
      @LeeXRV 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@black8art - there's significant value in underestimating a weapons capability to avoid providing a method of generating tactics against it. The British have always providing limited info on their weapons capabilities often not declaring game changing features and/or under reporting the weapons range (sometimes very significantly).

  • @ENGBriseB
    @ENGBriseB 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Good when the UK and France works together. They do achieve some great projects.

    • @WilliamEvans-py4gq
      @WilliamEvans-py4gq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      UK and France have worked together for many years

    • @WilliamEvans-py4gq
      @WilliamEvans-py4gq 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fair play

    • @daheikkinen
      @daheikkinen หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like bangers & crepes

  • @ToTheNines87368
    @ToTheNines87368 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +149

    I’d just like to add that the missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    • @markusbalbach7608
      @markusbalbach7608 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      muhahahahaha at LEAST it KNOWS (or doesnt) where it IS...NOW, because it KNEW where it wasnt...right NOW...have I missed something??

    • @bobjohnbowles
      @bobjohnbowles 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      However, along the way it achieved self-awareness and proclaimed 'Let there be light'. And there was light, and for a brief microsecond it saw that it was good.

    • @brulsmurf
      @brulsmurf 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Not sure if you are trolling or not. Well done.

    • @Gynra
      @Gynra 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      After reading that, I don't even know where I am now! 🤣

    • @yomama629
      @yomama629 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I swear I've already seen this exact comment somewhere

  • @1ndragunawan
    @1ndragunawan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    One of the weapon worth every hype.
    Pantsir missile just saying nope and turned around in front of a Storm Shadow is peak stealth weapon commercial.

    • @trezapoioiuy
      @trezapoioiuy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It managed to intimidate an AA missile, that’s quite the feat

    • @satrianifnr
      @satrianifnr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All nonsense, Russia has been shooting these things down like candy, along with the planes that launch them. Don't you find it strange that in an age of satellites, drones, every soldier and civilian with a 4k video camera in their pockets, that you're not inundated nightly with images of the battle on TV? Because it's all gaslighting, Ukraine is losing this attrition war, badly with casualty ratios favoring the Russians by 7:1 or higher, as evidenced by the Pentagon leaks. Curious how they won't talk about that, or Nordstream 1&2 isn't it?
      www.youtube.com/@TheDuran/videos
      www.youtube.com/@AlexMercouris
      www.youtube.com/@AlexChristoforou
      www.youtube.com/@TheNewAtlas
      www.youtube.com/@militarysummary
      www.youtube.com/@garlandn
      www.youtube.com/@WeebUnionWU
      www.youtube.com/@DefensePoliticsAsia
      sonar21.com/
      twitter.com/thatdayin1992
      www.youtube.com/@DouglasMacgregorStraightCalls
      www.youtube.com/@theroundtablegonzalolira5818
      www.youtube.com/@gonzalolira0229

  • @bigbadjohn10
    @bigbadjohn10 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Really good video. I have heard that the Storm Shadows sent by the UK and France were older and had been withdrawn to be destroyed. This is expensive to do. So it was good value to service them, make sure they would work and give them to Ukraine to use. The missiles get destroyed, the Ukrainians get a valuable target neutralised and it puts the Russians on the back foot! Seems like a win all round!

    • @PassportToPimlico
      @PassportToPimlico 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Storm Shadows from RAF stock are significantly more potent than the export version

    • @TomGodson95
      @TomGodson95 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@PassportToPimlico Double the range I believe and it also fires off a decoy before approaching the target

    • @PassportToPimlico
      @PassportToPimlico 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TomGodson95 I know one of the designers and he has hinted to me that we don't know the half of it

    • @mikelovesbacon
      @mikelovesbacon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes you get to bloody your enemy's nose with a weapon you were about to chuck in the bin. Bargain really

  • @sheepbow909
    @sheepbow909 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Funny how every single time France and the UK actually work together, they make wonders
    Except for the Suez crisis, we don't talk about that one

    • @axelamps1279
      @axelamps1279 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Suez what? Don't know what you're referring to mate...

    • @the6millionliraman
      @the6millionliraman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@axelamps1279 Some dodgy guy had two swimming pools and wanted to make one big swimming pool. Got a contractor in to do the work, didn't pay the contractor, then the contractor took possession of both swimming pools. Unfortunately for the contractor, dodgy swimming pool guy knew a guy and the contractor ended up getting swindled. Contractor proceeded to build Storm Shadow to dissuade dodgy pool guys of the future.

    • @sheepbow909
      @sheepbow909 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@axelamps1279 in short form, after WW2, Britain and France wanted to keep a hold of their imperialist territories and the idea was to work together and allow the new country of Israel, to invade Egypt and possess the entire Suez Canal.
      However in doing so, the USSR got angry as it was aggression for no reason over Egypt, an ally. And the US was angry that its allies had put an operation together without its notice, resulting in the failure of the operation.

    • @MrTheBassline
      @MrTheBassline 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Suez Crisis was a shitty band right?

    • @the6millionliraman
      @the6millionliraman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@sheepbow909 I think @axelamps1279 was being tongue-in-cheek dude.
      But now we're talking about what we don't like to talk about, let's also point out that Egypt (Nasser) was a Karen who went crying to the USSR (Khrushchev) after he arbitrarily nationalised the Suez Canal that had been built exclusively with foreign money (French and British). It's an unfair characterisation to say that Britain and France took over the canal "with no reason". They'd built one of the most expensive pieces of civil engineering in human history only to have it robbed off them by a dodgy dictator. Sure, illusory (*edit nostalgic) imperialistic ambitions played a part, but it was also a question of daylight robbery.

  • @tombowen9861
    @tombowen9861 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Just having the Storm Shadows in the area also means cheaper cruise missiles might be used to increase impact beyond the low numbers of Storm Shadows themselves. Tracking and threat identification systems tuned for seeking storm shadows might be confused by other low flying weapons and drive the Russian military to expend more expensive countermeasures like we saw when Himars was introduced.

    • @definitelyfrank9341
      @definitelyfrank9341 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Or they can just study the algorithms of the Storm Shadow that they captured, you know?

    • @lynby6231
      @lynby6231 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@definitelyfrank9341why how many have they captured?

    • @definitelyfrank9341
      @definitelyfrank9341 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lynby6231 At least one fully intact missile.

  • @montyspearo
    @montyspearo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Intelligence from locals in occupied territory is what helps to make this missiles so effective. They can also provide up todate photos to help missile identify the target.

    • @fjalics
      @fjalics 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Intelligence from locals can be gold, but so can all the images the west is providing.

    • @cornellkirk8946
      @cornellkirk8946 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Since when we’re locals able to take pics and update storm missiles? 🤔 please do attempt to explain his pics taken from the ground are able to update the satellite/OH format with pics taken from the ground….
      Or have you just made this up? 🤔

    • @GorgeDawes
      @GorgeDawes 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Locals take pictures which tell Ukrainian Intelligence where the invading forces are placing their fuel/ammunition dumps or Command facilities. Storm Shadow missiles get sent to that location. This is not a difficult concept to grasp.

  • @Andy-nl8uq
    @Andy-nl8uq 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great video. I got a bit nostalgic when i saw the Tornadoes carrying them though. As an army brat, the base we were near used to have them fly over super low trying to set off the base alarms. Theyd come over the house so low you could clearly see the pilots. I miss those planes.

    • @brucesmith3740
      @brucesmith3740 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nothing warms my heart more than mankind's tools of destruction.

  • @martinstallard2742
    @martinstallard2742 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    1:14 killing from a distance
    5:17 birth of a weapon
    8:57 missiles over Ukraine
    14:22 weapon of the future

    • @stevedave70
      @stevedave70 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Not all heros wear capes

    • @jankwartel1860
      @jankwartel1860 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@stevedave70some have wings.

    • @VajrahahaShunyata
      @VajrahahaShunyata 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Captian shart?...🤔

  • @mpersad
    @mpersad 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Once again, terrific research and analysis. This network of YT channels gets better and better.

  • @XNeo27564
    @XNeo27564 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    I saw a video. A stormshadow was hunted by a pansir AA with optical guidance. The ruski's fired 2 rockets at the stormshadow which you could see on screen aimed at. And they (rockets) just turned 90° left!!! Couldnt hit it twice... and the shadow hit the bridge. WTF. Impressive stuff.

    • @maximorlov8208
      @maximorlov8208 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Where can I find this video?

    • @johnclayton7471
      @johnclayton7471 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@maximorlov8208 th-cam.com/video/BX2IbhPdxy0/w-d-xo.html

    • @Matt-yg8ub
      @Matt-yg8ub 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@maximorlov8208 good luck, chances are it doesn’t exist.

    • @Markus117d
      @Markus117d 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/BX2IbhPdxy0/w-d-xo.html 😄👍

    • @FallenPhoenix86
      @FallenPhoenix86 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Matt-yg8ub
      Read it again, the Storm Shadow didn't maneuver, the SAMS did.
      Delta V also doesn't apply since SS isn't rocket propelled, reaction mass and burn time are irrelevant components.

  • @archivis
    @archivis 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    MISSILES on teapots for delivering tea without getting off your couch.

  • @jonathanbuzzard1376
    @jonathanbuzzard1376 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It should be noted that the UK do not have export variants of Storm Shadow to give to Ukraine. So unless we are specially modifying them for Ukraine (rather unlikely) they are get the full range version.

    • @TheEulerID
      @TheEulerID 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The range will just be defined in the software. It would be a very simple job to alter the relevant parameters in the software before delivery. Of course it could only be changed with the appropriate systems and security.
      As with so many modern "smart" systems, much is effectively defined in software.

    • @jonathanbuzzard1376
      @jonathanbuzzard1376 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheEulerID I would point out several things. When questioned the UK defence minister refused to answer questions about the range of the missiles Ukraine received. Two the treaty a out missile technology is for those with a payload of 500kg and up. Given Storm Shadow only has a payload of 450kg those "restrictions" simply don't apply. Thirdly it is not at all clear if the treaty applies to nations with a domestic capability that exceeds the treaty. Though calling it a treaty is going a bit far it's more like a memorandum of understanding. The only actual restriction will be don't blow shit up in Russias internationally recognized borders.

  • @ericchild8845
    @ericchild8845 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Thank you, Simon. I always enjoy your content and your sense of humor that you deliver the information with making it enjoyable in spite of some deadly subject matter. Cheers from NorCal

    • @yfelwulf
      @yfelwulf 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does he know the UK government created the Nazi units Right Sector 1&2 using UK Nazis? Does he know Boris Johnson got ZZelinsky to teear up a signed peace deal obviously not.
      Most of these have been shot down or destroyed in storage. Those that have hit have done insignificant damage. Gotta love propaganda from Shitstain 🇬🇧

  • @revoltx1
    @revoltx1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very informative thanks

  • @toker6664
    @toker6664 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The issue with stormshadow is that the destruction isnt upfront and is always covered up, but its strength is logistical pain which isnt sexy to casual war observers

    • @dh1380
      @dh1380 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If what I have read lately about the US providing GLSDB and cluster munitions is true then this spells a whole new level of logistical pain on the way. Storm shadow is intended for use as a penetrative munition, primarily. Bridges aren't really an ideal target but it seems to be doing OK nonetheless. I vaguely recall hearing somebody in the RAF tell me the US was desperate to get hold of Storm Shadow due to how good it is, but it was the one thing the UK would not give them access to.

    • @toker6664
      @toker6664 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dh1380 also the USA has a USA only made policy why the USA hasn't purchased Brimstone missiles which are highly effective and battle proven with anecdotal stories of US forces specifically requesting there use by RAF in Iraq and Afghanistan, cluster munitions are stupid effective for trench warfare and would strike fear in any mobnik soldier.

  • @CtrlOptDel
    @CtrlOptDel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Rivals often do make the best partners, this Anglo-French co-developed missile is basically the Concorde of "F••• around and find out".

  • @herbertkeithmiller
    @herbertkeithmiller 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Cost of the Storm Shadow one million dollars. Putting a hole in the Crimean bridge, priceless.
    The US should give Ukraine MGM-140 ATACMS long range missiles for it's HIMARS and MLRS (HIMARS big brother). They can hit targets 300km away about the same range as Storm Shadow. The two would compliment each other.

    • @MuchCow9000
      @MuchCow9000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ATACMS are 150km more than the Stormshadow

    • @herbertkeithmiller
      @herbertkeithmiller 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MuchCow9000 oops I got it wrong.
      Doing more checking I find the export version Storm Shadow is 290 km Which is the version Ukraine got.
      The ATACMS (except for the initial block 1) is 300 km so they are roughly equivalent. Thank you for pointing that out.

  • @1LSWilliam
    @1LSWilliam 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How refreshing! You actually tend towards objectivity despite your manifest proclivities to do otherwise. Good for you.

  • @firstlast5350
    @firstlast5350 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting and informative. Thanks.

  • @Shwalamazula
    @Shwalamazula 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    After watching this, I was looking for a megaprojets on the tomahawk. Surprised to not see one.

  • @kingcharlesvi4810
    @kingcharlesvi4810 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    I have a friend who was on the esrly testing for this. Apparently (unconfirmed), they did one test to see if they could both fit through the same hole in a target one after the other. The top brass didn't believe it had worked by my friend proved it had. Amazing piece of kit, amazing video!

    • @markusbalbach7608
      @markusbalbach7608 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SHOW of PROOF or it NEVER HAPPEND you WINDBEUTEL!

    • @HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH
      @HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Russia will send TWO equivalents into your house, will be amazing!

    • @csongorkovacs4696
      @csongorkovacs4696 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      source: trust me bro

    • @ViDeOMaStErPaUl
      @ViDeOMaStErPaUl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@thomaswilliams6690 f you got shit to prove then you do it. Robinhood destroyed his arrows to prove a point.

    • @yfelwulf
      @yfelwulf 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does he know the UK government created the Nazi units Right Sector 1&2 using UK Nazis? Does he know Boris Johnson got ZZelinsky to teear up a signed peace deal obviously not.
      Most of these have been shot down or destroyed in storage. Those that have hit have done insignificant damage. Gotta love propaganda from Shitstain 🇬🇧

  • @sundragon7703
    @sundragon7703 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    Gold star for Ukrainian Air Force maintainers for the ability to successfully merge a state of the art weapon to a museum piece.

    • @nicholasbrown668
      @nicholasbrown668 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      my guy, the storm shadow is the same age as a middle age male

    • @cacwgm
      @cacwgm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Apparently, Polish techs did the integration work.

    • @Akm72
      @Akm72 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@cacwgm I'd guess it was a joint effort between British, French, Polish and Ukrainian engineers.

    • @bobjohnbowles
      @bobjohnbowles 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@UwU-pk6nv So far no weapons sent to Ukraine have been state-of-the-art, except maybe Bayraktar. But they are still at least 30 years newer than most of the Russian stuff.

    • @jwenting
      @jwenting 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@UwU-pk6nv nor is the Su-24 a museum piece. It's pretty much the most potent heavy long range strike aircraft in the world today.

  • @ronboff3461
    @ronboff3461 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    excellent presentation! thank you

  • @jamesedwards7241
    @jamesedwards7241 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    While the missiles supplied to Ukraine are interesting and may change a lot of metrics in this war it should always be
    remembered that they are just a few of the one thousand the Uk originally had in stock and were scheduled for disposal after a number of them, and only a small number at that were chosen for upgrades. The remaining missiles would have been dismantled and disposed of in a process that is constantly underway so sending them to Ukraine was not a real problem, they are out-of-date tech and so not so much of a concern to NATO which retains fully upgraded Storm Shadow missiles, if in much lower than ideal numbers as newer designs progress to the supply stage. We see a lot of this with the war in Ukraine, nations supplying what is essentially out-of-date equipment or such that it is about to be withdrawn as replacement types come on stream.

  • @Bill_the_Red_Lichtie
    @Bill_the_Red_Lichtie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    2:47 A blistering Mach 0.8 or "just really bloody quick". Brilliant! 🤣 🤣

    • @tommarney1561
      @tommarney1561 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know, right? 😄

  • @KristenKelly-lb9ny
    @KristenKelly-lb9ny 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the music when introduces a segment or whatever it's actually called

  • @patdbean
    @patdbean 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    16:00 i think that fot antiship, hypersonic makes more sence. The ship is a moving target and the missile will need tonuse radar to locate the ship thereby giving a warning of its approach. So mach 5+ speed gives the ship less warrning.
    For land attack, the terrain can be used to mask the missiles approach along with flying low. So a stealthy subsonic missile probably makes more sence.

  • @atomicjesus101
    @atomicjesus101 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    it was kinda a throwaway line about hypersonics in the Ukraine war being underperforming, but it made me think a video about the patriot and its history would be a fun video.

    • @Markus117d
      @Markus117d 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Patriot was designed to target enemy aircraft, It wasn't really intended to be anti-missile to begin with, Which is why it had a 25% intercept success rate back in the beginning in that role, Which is still impressive all things considered, Although of course it doesn't appear that way to those who don't know the context behind those figures, But since then it's been upgraded, Develop and improved. It's now a very reliable and dependable system. With a intercept success rate in the region of 80 - 95% depending on the source..

  • @kazekamiha
    @kazekamiha 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Russian General: Finally out of HiMARS range... I am safe.
    Storm Shadow: Greetings there Old Chap. May I introduce myself?

  • @ronaldmarcks1842
    @ronaldmarcks1842 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don't mean to be rude, but I'm so glad this dude speaks quickly. Good stuff.

  • @87Redknight
    @87Redknight 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cruising on the subject for this channel

  • @JohnnyWednesday
    @JohnnyWednesday 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    When did Megaprojects stop covering mega projects?

    • @Andrew-pr9xv
      @Andrew-pr9xv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Side Projects does seem like a better place for this.

    • @grapefruitsimmons
      @grapefruitsimmons 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Since the war started. Hes super pro-war, have you seen how he grins when he talks about ww3 and civilians dying? Its insane

    • @mlee6050
      @mlee6050 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought he keep the invasion on the warographic channel

  • @sagialagem
    @sagialagem 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This guy… best story teller on TH-cam.

  • @Shadow-1949
    @Shadow-1949 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the way they come out go down a little bit then go up a little bit, and then basically just fly away

  • @thecaribbean8615
    @thecaribbean8615 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like the idea of sub-munitions I saw in the video to overwhelm ship defense systems.

  • @timshulepov
    @timshulepov 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Man, Megaprojects has been on the roll with all the military aid Ukraine has been getting. :) It's almost like watching the news, but with all the boring parts skipped.

  • @dinsdalemontypiranha4349
    @dinsdalemontypiranha4349 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    More good news for Ukraine! Thanks for sharing this with us Simon.

    • @Maungateitei
      @Maungateitei 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They will be destroyed as soon as they cross the border.
      This is antique rubbish.

    • @suprarcjpop545
      @suprarcjpop545 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      hahaha

  • @glynnwright1699
    @glynnwright1699 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It goes back much further than 1997, in fact feasibility studies were being conducted by BAE in the 1970s. The basic design of the guidance system had been finalised by 1982. The real impetus came from the first Gulf War and the poor performance of JP233. It was realised, as had been predicted by effectiveness modelling, that an aircraft delivering runway denial munitions stood a good chance of being shot down and not doing much damage in the process. Early studies involved putting wings and an engine on the JP233 airframe, but that was a huge lump of metal to start with.

  • @SerialChronicles
    @SerialChronicles 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great info as usual ❤

  • @chernobyl68
    @chernobyl68 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Sounds very similar in capability to a tomahawk as far as flight profile and targeting goes, but the bunker busting and ability to be launched from a fighter are something a tomahawk cant do as far as i know.

    • @jensonkiin3678
      @jensonkiin3678 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It also has low-observability unlike Tomahawk. A better comparison would be the AGM-158 JASSM, which is basically the American equivilent.

  • @doodskie999
    @doodskie999 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Giving weapons and providing a real life test bed seems like a win win situation for other nations

    • @miscbits6399
      @miscbits6399 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is why they're doing it, however they're still only providing older kit, just in case the Russians get their hands on it

  • @chestnystarik1
    @chestnystarik1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks as usual!!!

  • @alexander-mauricemillamlae4567
    @alexander-mauricemillamlae4567 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    3:23 Simon's jab has inspired me to start playing the lottery in an attempt to get the money to buy such a missile and put it onto a model airplane. Or maybe a real airplane. Depends on how much, if I win. Thanks Simon!

  • @cuz129
    @cuz129 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That incredibly dry British humor so outclasses anything we have stateside. What a great channel!

  • @EMCUEAY
    @EMCUEAY 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Russia just picked one up today. Ukraine giving things away like it means nothing.

    • @carinhall4508
      @carinhall4508 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂

    • @mlee6050
      @mlee6050 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia uses 60-80% of there stuff avoiding their target like a strom trooper

  • @Shadow-1949
    @Shadow-1949 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good job Ty

  • @colinhiggs70
    @colinhiggs70 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Simon: but first, we're going to take a detour into the history of the storm shadow.
    Me: listens to the first 10 seconds of a plumbing advert before realising.

  • @LordDustinDeWynd
    @LordDustinDeWynd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    👋 👍 🙃 Greetings from Tanglefoot, Texas, USA!

    • @Ukbrummie
      @Ukbrummie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hey there 👋 from the uk

    • @billybonds4449
      @billybonds4449 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Our UK SS Missiles can move like a Texas Lizard on glass. (CW McCall)

  • @PolishNomad95
    @PolishNomad95 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The thing about himars and stormshadow that is so damaging for the Russian military aside from the direct damage they can do is how much they fuck with Russia's already abismal logistics. This is a military that still needs to use trains to transport cargo in large quantities, stores equipment in giant piles of individual boxes, and load/unload almost everything by hand. Every time they have to move their major stockpiles further away from front lines and make their front line stockpiles smaller and more dispersed, the speed and effectiveness that they can supply their troops drops drastically. Front line positions have fewer resources and ammunition to hold off Ukrainian attacks and it takes longer for their spent resources to be restocked.

    • @MrLeadb1
      @MrLeadb1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣🤣🤣...the stuff people invent in their heads to cope...😂😂😂

    • @PolishNomad95
      @PolishNomad95 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MrLeadb1 This is literally common knowledge. The military you're simping for doesn't know what a forklift is.

    • @PolishNomad95
      @PolishNomad95 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@MrLeadb1 come back to me about Russian supply issues being cope when the vehicles in their victory day parade consist of more than just a handful of ballistic missile launchers and a single T-34.

  • @jamesnicholls9969
    @jamesnicholls9969 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    it also can be launched from ships which is what the French Navy does as well launching from its Rafale

  • @jubjub7101
    @jubjub7101 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks to Simon, I drink AG1 every morning and since I started a month ago, it’s made a difference in several aspects of my body.

  • @AdityaKumar-wz9ce
    @AdityaKumar-wz9ce 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Last time Leopard 2 was gamechanger.

  • @battlesheep2552
    @battlesheep2552 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Isnt Storm Shadow a character from GI Joe?

  • @flagmichael
    @flagmichael 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Next (?) swarm missiles with laser seekers and a laser designator guide. What would be used to harden the guide is a good question.

  • @imartotun
    @imartotun 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What about the missile Gungir from Bofors? (Gungir being Odins spear that never missed)

    • @davidlium9338
      @davidlium9338 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for explaining the name.

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what a great name! It could be Gimli's big brother, too, by the way.

  • @jolantru3085
    @jolantru3085 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Still the best land-attack missile, even after so many years.

    • @heyhoe168
      @heyhoe168 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Peer to peer competitor to SS-N-27 «Sizzler», except it is 2 times more expensive then the russian variant.

    • @jolantru3085
      @jolantru3085 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@heyhoe168
      Except Russian ordnance has, repeatedly, been shown to perform incredibly poorly in actual combat compared to their NATO equivalents.
      Harkens back to the old Vympel R-77 vs. AIM-120 thing.

    • @heyhoe168
      @heyhoe168 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jolantru3085 are you sure? SS-N-27 was invincible first few month of the war too. We should compare results when russian AA crews will get some experience in detecting those SS missiles.

    • @coconutsmarties
      @coconutsmarties 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@@heyhoe168Y'know your comment history makes you look a bit defensive about Russian military capabilities.. It's not exactly a secret that Russian hardware has as a whole performed spectacularly poorly in this war, so far at least

    • @heyhoe168
      @heyhoe168 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@coconutsmarties I just state simple facts and ask legit questions. If you want to unconditionally believe into "not exactly secrets", it is not my business.

  • @terminator-ua
    @terminator-ua 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you! Дякую!

  • @colrodrick8784
    @colrodrick8784 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent video

  • @carinhall4508
    @carinhall4508 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hahaha, this is funny seeing how Russia just picked up a like new one.

  • @Armpittt
    @Armpittt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Hey Simon!
    Love all the hard work you're putting into your channels.
    Any chance of a "boots on the ground" in Ukraine from different countries video?
    Much love!

  • @chrisdominguez7485
    @chrisdominguez7485 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good story. Good job!

  • @AlexTheFlyingRoach
    @AlexTheFlyingRoach 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You should do a video of the abnormal "flying tank", the Mi-24 Hind

  • @billotto602
    @billotto602 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It's nice to see that Britain has an MP with a bit of Sir Winston Churchill in him ! Jolly good old boy !✌️ for victory !🫡 🇬🇧 🇺🇸

    • @Snagprophet
      @Snagprophet 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ben Wallace appears to be the only saving grace of our Conservative government. If we were a republic then I'd certainly want him as president.

    • @GorgeDawes
      @GorgeDawes 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Churchill’s grandson was until recently a long-serving Conservative MP but Boris and chums kicked him out of the party for being insufficiently enthusiastic about their bonkers Brexit project.

  • @Mediocre_JT
    @Mediocre_JT 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    16ft long with 1000lb warhead flying at you at 600mph+ is beyond horrifying.

    • @fogcat5
      @fogcat5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      not for very long

    • @BouncingZeus
      @BouncingZeus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@fogcat5 Yes it is almost as horrifying as the US's unconfirmed officially missile that doesn't use an explosive warhead just blades that pop out with a kill range of about 6 ft. That has been used to kill high value targets near civis.

    • @gregbarnes4083
      @gregbarnes4083 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@BouncingZeusYou mean the AGM-114 R9X? The missile was confirmed to exist back in 2019

    • @militantcapitalist4606
      @militantcapitalist4606 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@fogcat5 you mean they are going to run out? or that just you have enough mobiks that gather in groups for all of them?

  • @indiana146
    @indiana146 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks

  • @walkerhartge9177
    @walkerhartge9177 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have heard that FC/ASW was supposed to be multiple missiles including a Hypersonic cruise Missile but they cancelled the HCM

  • @LePondLaDuck
    @LePondLaDuck 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    If I’m paying 800k for a missile I hope a fair chunk is going to the PR team. Top marks to whoever thought “storm shadow” was a good name for a missile.

    • @iPsOfAcT0
      @iPsOfAcT0 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agreed on the name, better than the frog's calling Scalp

    • @gregbarnes4083
      @gregbarnes4083 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Same with the Brits new air-to-air missile, The Meteor, whoever is coming up with these names needs all the bonuses they can get.
      Edit: Almost forgot about their other weapon systems like StarStreak, Martlet, Brimstone and Sky Sabre

    • @Akm72
      @Akm72 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@gregbarnes4083 We don't talk about Seaceptor though!!!

    • @BrySkye
      @BrySkye 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@gregbarnes4083 Brimstone came about because it was a direct derivative of the Hellfire. So yeah, its literally just "Hellfire and Brimstone"

  • @PaulGuy
    @PaulGuy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Obviously the next missile needs to be named Snake Eyes.

    • @autothrust330
      @autothrust330 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂

    • @gregbarnes4083
      @gregbarnes4083 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I love that but thats already a weapon system 😂 It's a varient of the MK82 bomb

  • @rookiexreviews
    @rookiexreviews 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gotta love that good ol death and destruction am i right peat?

  • @kre4ture218
    @kre4ture218 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Now do one on the KEPD350 Taurus

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    1:20 - Chapter 1 - Killing from a distance
    5:20 - Chapter 2 - Birth of a weapon
    9:00 - Chapter 3 - Missiles over ukraine
    14:25 - Chapter 4 - Weapon of the future

    • @MuchCow9000
      @MuchCow9000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      - Chapter 7 - Profit

  • @theskullyhippiedude3719
    @theskullyhippiedude3719 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Can't go wrong naming stuff after GI joe characters.

  • @onkelkonkel18
    @onkelkonkel18 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great one, as always!
    May I request you do a documentary about Koenigsegg? They ought to be Mega enough now, right? Thank you in advance, and keep up the great work!
    Thank you! 🤘🤘❤️

  • @Ironsight_Player
    @Ironsight_Player 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the name, it flat out sounds badass

  • @danielmacaskill720
    @danielmacaskill720 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I can imagine megaprojects is where Russian intelligence gets their intel from

  • @danr1920
    @danr1920 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The Ukraine gets enough not to lose, but not enough to win.

    • @intrepidpursuit
      @intrepidpursuit 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That seems to be their fate until Putin dies, and maybe beyond.

    • @joseamadorsilva7395
      @joseamadorsilva7395 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's 20 + year old tech.. basically imagine supplying your allies with military communications equipment akin to a Motorola flip phone. .. like 2G

  • @talscorner3696
    @talscorner3696 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ah, yes, the good old "It's stealth if nobody's left to witness it"

  • @Grebogoborp
    @Grebogoborp 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Imagine being the guy who proposed the storm shadow you just walk into a government office and say ok hear me out guys stealth cruise missile and instantly get 9 billion dollars and top level clearance

    • @staggabob
      @staggabob 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Imagine being someone who believes that's how it went down...

    • @Grebogoborp
      @Grebogoborp 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@staggabob it was a joke not me truly believing that most likely the program was the result of the government putting out a specification and companies bidding on it but I think its way funnier to imagine that what happened was some random dude with a funny briefcase walked into the British ministry of defense and tried to sell it like a door to door salesman

  • @maxplanck9055
    @maxplanck9055 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Sounds like the royal air force have an excellent missile for high profile stationary targets at long range, a potential threat to any nation if they are hostile ✌️♥️🇬🇧

  • @michaelmcgovern8110
    @michaelmcgovern8110 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I see Simon's name and face, I say, "Oh, Simon: tell me!"

  • @BionicRusty
    @BionicRusty 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I worked on the Electro Optical System on Stormshadow for many years.

  • @therakshasan8547
    @therakshasan8547 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The faux coupe in Russia is just a way to move troops from Dunbass to Belarus for the second assault on Kiev .

    • @Erelio
      @Erelio 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤪

    • @Ray-gl2vr
      @Ray-gl2vr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why would Putin make himself look weak with a "faux coup" when they could have just moved them?

  • @madcalm2024
    @madcalm2024 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanx the GB for this weapon ! ))

  • @stevethegeckotv
    @stevethegeckotv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I don’t know who wrote this but they’re inaccurate in the Frogfoot’s payload. It’s a dedicated attack aircraft capable of carrying 4400kg of weapons.

    • @adiec100
      @adiec100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I think that the max payload for each of the su25 hard points is 500kg, so not capable of taking a 1500kg Storm shaddow.

    • @gregbarnes4083
      @gregbarnes4083 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In the video he stated specifically the pylons can only hold 500kgs, the aircraft itself can hold a lot more but the hardpoints themselves can't carry the load individually

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it was a tricky part of the video. I had to listen twice.
      Simon says :- )
      "the Frogfoot can carry 500 kg payloadS"
      in plural. NOT a payload of 500 kg.
      based on that plural, and based on the fact that a 500 kg total payload would be a bad joke, I think he meant the max capacity of the strongest PYLONS of those 2 planes

  • @backupplan6058
    @backupplan6058 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Given my neighbours, money well spent. Anyone happen to have a Tornado I could borrow for the weekend?

  • @sandhilltucker
    @sandhilltucker 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:02 Panavia Tornado still in service? NICE!

  • @magus104
    @magus104 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I kinda love how this whole war has destroyed the vision of Russia as some super power to be feared. They start an unjust war with a neighboring country which you would think they would be steam rolling them and nope.

    • @BouncingZeus
      @BouncingZeus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It isn't a good thing either. It will likely destabilize a lot of the old former soviet countries. They were all kept in check by Russia. This could lead to a lot of conflicts.

    • @ImmuneNimatoad
      @ImmuneNimatoad 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@joemilone6 Not really. The conflicts were more than likely going to happen with or without this invasion.
      It's not like russia is doing anything with the tension between Azerbaijan and Armenia.
      Sure it will allow the other countries/people that Russia has historically been a dick to like Georgia to rise up and possibly start thier separation from Russia but given how this war is going they may not be able to do to much. A war in two fronts is impossible or whatever that saying is.

    • @rumatadestora
      @rumatadestora 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@BouncingZeusconsidering the history of Russian invasions it's absolutely a good thing. Plus, Putin brought it on himself

    • @militantcapitalist4606
      @militantcapitalist4606 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BouncingZeus 💩🤡

  • @abroom144
    @abroom144 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Storm Shadow: The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    • @izak5356
      @izak5356 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you shamelessly slightly alter and then steal someone's comment or is this a copy pasta

    • @abroom144
      @abroom144 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@izak5356 i just find it on the internet the text

    • @mikelovesbacon
      @mikelovesbacon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@izak5356 It's a meme (copypasta)

  • @aerotube7291
    @aerotube7291 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We always use that acrynom....f****g cool as Simon Whistler

  • @timeline3219
    @timeline3219 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just realised Megaprojects now have over a Million subs. Congrats I guess-

  • @keithtwizzy2700
    @keithtwizzy2700 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This big boy just destroyed the black sea fleet of russia in Crimea ...... I kinda have a bad feeling about this one payback will come 10 times harder we all should know by now!! Peace ✌🏽 now

  • @grapefruitsimmons
    @grapefruitsimmons 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    This channel has become an ad for Raytheon and the military industrial complex

    • @bikes02
      @bikes02 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      cope harder

    • @nicholasbrown668
      @nicholasbrown668 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@bikes02how is that coping? Simon often touts propaganda in his videos

    • @caesarsalad1170
      @caesarsalad1170 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bikes02 How is his comment coping?

    • @Morris2182
      @Morris2182 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@bikes02respond better

    • @dazamanday
      @dazamanday 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@nicholasbrown668yup and he's now working for the CIA
      🤡😂

  • @glynjones8187
    @glynjones8187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These are old block one systems being used that are reaching there shelf life, wait till the newer variants and compatable jets are used.

  • @tomaburque
    @tomaburque 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool. Do one on ATACMS pretty please.

  • @NoMoReBoTz99
    @NoMoReBoTz99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    As an 🇺🇸 God Bless Ben Wallace 👍

    • @burimsallahu3209
      @burimsallahu3209 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧💪💪💪💪