Take a ride inside Ehang’s fully autonomous, two-seater air taxi

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 เม.ย. 2024
  • About an hour’s drive from the company’s headquarters in Guangzhou, China, sits a test site for Ehang’s autonomous aerial vehicles.
    Perched on the tarmac during CNBC’s visit was the company’s fully autonomous, two-seater air taxi.
    “This is our EH216 model, and it is positioned for short-distance transportation or sightseeing in the city,” said Dong Wang, Ehang’s vice president of technical research and development. His interview with “CNBC Tech: The Edge” has been translated into English from Mandarin.
    In October 2023, Ehang announced the EH216-S AAV had secured a “type certificate” from the Civil Aviation Administration of China, the country’s equivalent to the Federal Aviation Administration in the United States - a certification Wang said is a world first.
    “The operation is fully automated. Its scheduling system runs on the server, so its route is automatically loaded, and then it carries out a completely automated route flight.”
    The aircraft will cost $410,000 overseas, with a reduced price tag of 2.39 million yuan in China, equal to about $330,000.
    “We also have a larger aircraft for transportation between cities. Because of this other aircraft, we also need to build a vertical take-off and landing flight site between cities,” Wang said.
    Ehang plans to start commercial operations in China before the end of the year.
    Take a tour of the EH216 and watch its test flight by clicking the video above.
    #CNBC #EHang #eVTOL
    -----
    Subscribe: cnb.cx/2wuoARM
    CNBC International TV: cnb.cx/2NGytpz
    LinkedIn: / cnbc-international
    TikTok: / cnbci
    Facebook: / cnbcinternational
    Instagram: / cnbcinternational
    Threads: www.threads.net/@cnbcinternat...
    X: / cnbci
    Telegram: t.me/cnbci
    WhatsApp: bit.ly/CNBCiWhatsApp
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 353

  • @CNBCi
    @CNBCi  หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    *Thank you for watching. This video is a part of a four-part CNBC Tech series on eVTOLS. You can check out the other parts below:*
    • What are eVTOLS? The evolution of 'flying cars' explained - th-cam.com/video/7gLBJpnmAo8/w-d-xo.html
    • Inside Alef, the company trying to build a car you can both drive and fly - th-cam.com/video/qtzuL3WSiGY/w-d-xo.html
    • Inside Lilium, the German company trying to revolutionize air travel - th-cam.com/video/4hxk30BTwgY/w-d-xo.html

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why do you lend legitamcy to this fraudulent enterprise? No range numbers, no duration numbers, no recharge times, no video of passengers carried.

  • @alileevil
    @alileevil หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    The USA: This is a national security risk.

  • @wroughtforge7547
    @wroughtforge7547 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    China advancement mind blowing.

  • @ateksudianto6237
    @ateksudianto6237 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    at least this is safer than boeing

    • @siakakone6021
      @siakakone6021 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Safer…🤦🏾‍♂️

  • @Wunderpus-photogenicus
    @Wunderpus-photogenicus 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +14

    Although all these major achievements are great (amazingly fast and effective constructions of infrastructures, high-speed rail, airports, space station, lunar explorations, EVs, battery technology, AI leadership, aircraft carriers, money-less payment systems, etc., etc.), however the most important aspect and characteristics of China is its peaceful nature in its global policies. The friendliness of its population toward visiting guests is another beauty of China. The tasty and affordable food variety also helps a lot.

    • @gndeka1188
      @gndeka1188 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      China's neighbours have other opinion on its friendliness. Ask philipines

    • @Wunderpus-photogenicus
      @Wunderpus-photogenicus 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@gndeka1188 if you ask a “slave/dog under the gun” these kinds of questions, it is meaningless; any wrong move by the slaver will inevitably result in severe whipping by his master ( sanctions; military threats, including forced occupation; force colonization and murders like last time; etc). If you are truly serious, you should ask someone (country) who is totally independent (militarily and politically), and has a mind of his own.

  • @chinkongfah9377
    @chinkongfah9377 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    US: Dare to dream
    China: Dare to do.

    • @SometimesIamNot
      @SometimesIamNot 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That is so called American dream.

  • @raideepu4
    @raideepu4 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Ehang and Xpeng are the pioneers in AEV and EVTOL.

  • @passby8070
    @passby8070 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I can see that this can be used as express transport between high congestion areas or difficult terrain such as across a large body of water or steep mountains.

  • @dhickey5919
    @dhickey5919 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    Wow. Back in the US we have Boeing.... sigh.

    • @xx133
      @xx133 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      We don’t even a modern public transportation and high speed rail system.

    • @Pyramid1974
      @Pyramid1974 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No worries, I live in Florida and I have the answer to the whole evtol thing.. regardless of the electric part.. I just don't yet have the knowledge of being able to take what is in my head and put it down onto something and 3d print it or whatever.. I'm just a paraplegic guy living in his bedroom.. But I intend to figure these things out.. and when I do it will change the world.. Laugh if any wants to, I get it.. lol but mark my words..

    • @destinywhitehouse8247
      @destinywhitehouse8247 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Pyramid1974 I believe you

    • @timothylee2772
      @timothylee2772 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Boeing track record in safety: 🤣🤣🤣👎👎👎👎

    • @anthonyfernandez7833
      @anthonyfernandez7833 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      wumao bot need some reprogramming. Need to look up the term EVTOL.

  • @BrandyHeng007
    @BrandyHeng007 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    US still using pilot driven helicopters
    China getting more advance by using pilotless, auto driven eVTOL

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You mean passengerless.

    • @LH1xx
      @LH1xx หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@yukon4511 Pilotless, passengers can be inside.

    • @xx133
      @xx133 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      No, you definitely want pilots. I don’t want my life in the hands of a primitive AI system. Trust me airlines want to replace of pilots, and are working to reduce pilots in cockpit from 2 to 1. Surely nothing will go wrong.
      Let’s start by building a decent public transportation system and high speed rail. Far cheaper safer efficient and cost effective.

    • @LH1xx
      @LH1xx หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xx133 I trust AI pilots, I can't trust so many pilots who fly their machines on top of your head who may be alcoholics or drug addicts.

    • @anthonyfernandez7833
      @anthonyfernandez7833 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah that must be it. Nothing to do with regulation. Ofc in China no one cares if you get killed in one of these things but in the west people do care.

  • @tonywei423
    @tonywei423 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    EH216-s already start commercial flight 2 weeks ago in Shenzhen, the city will open 200 air routes by the end of 2025, more Chinese cities will start to follow, the low attitude air economy is starting, also more parcels will transport by low attitude air virtual highway in the near future.

  • @darealbrianpark
    @darealbrianpark หลายเดือนก่อน +115

    China is fast, USA is slow.

    • @supertec2023
      @supertec2023 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      When you take shortcuts for everything you can get things done faster.

    • @davidz7858
      @davidz7858 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@supertec2023 when everything has to deal with political correctness, you can't do anything. American workers are spoiled and too lazy. Also, people become more and more greedy, most smart people study for medical school, law school, finance, and you can see there are a lot of unqualified students in STEM fields and school has to Lower the standards so they can pass the Ph.D. qualifying exam

    • @yuglobalcitizen2246
      @yuglobalcitizen2246 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      ​@@supertec2023yep China wants u to keep thinking like that.

    • @ytfanlingeric
      @ytfanlingeric หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@supertec2023 Development of infrastructure like the high-speed railway system in the US is not taking shortcuts, that is definitely the American way to go.

    • @Brad_Fallon
      @Brad_Fallon หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      China now has an electric bicycle that runs on solid hydrogen!

  • @freeman041
    @freeman041 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Amazing!!

  • @rominho151
    @rominho151 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    IS the future!

    • @supertec2023
      @supertec2023 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No it's not

    • @ppen8359
      @ppen8359 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What about privacy? Everything is server-controlled. The Chinese government may fly you directly to prison.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What about internet and cable outages? Happens here frequently.

    • @user-mw4ki4fb7y
      @user-mw4ki4fb7y 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Is a disaster

  • @justme6275
    @justme6275 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    wow, endless possibilities with this...

  • @diamondgalore372
    @diamondgalore372 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Ehang 🎉

  • @adtiamzon3663
    @adtiamzon3663 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    😍 Transformational air taxi, indeed. eHang 🇨🇳😲👏👏🤝🌞

  • @marcmayou1422
    @marcmayou1422 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very cool

  • @joosiekawk
    @joosiekawk 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    they should upgrade it with some type of skirt to cover the rotating wings

  • @walungamaandrewkiyingi3780
    @walungamaandrewkiyingi3780 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Can the flying taxi be customized to simpler missions like ranch rovers? That is a replacement for choppers that large land ranchers and other agro/conservation teams use

    • @gulyascredo
      @gulyascredo หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You have DJI for that. The top drone manufacturer in the world by far, and widely used in agriculture and forestry. Check it out.

    • @lunlunqq
      @lunlunqq 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      The DJI matrice series maybe what you are looking for. While DJI had a few series of drone for industrial/agricultural used, check them out.

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Can you fly in the DJI drone?

  • @JBaxter-pi8oj
    @JBaxter-pi8oj หลายเดือนก่อน

    What happens in the scenario where the passengers may have to take over the operation of this aircraft. Is this possible?

    • @wengv
      @wengv 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I think you can only give the command to where you wanted to go.

  • @Insight_Compass
    @Insight_Compass หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Interesting...

  • @zocentive3691
    @zocentive3691 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Was just there last week

  • @user-sk4gj3ji3o
    @user-sk4gj3ji3o 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Commercial success of any projects depends on the phisibilty and viability of the concept. However the idea is not bad .

  • @mw6563
    @mw6563 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I am not aware of the FAA certifying “autonomous” passenger flight. If the FAA did someday sign off, the first fatal crashes (for any reason) would force a pilot to be added on board. Passengers like pilots to be on their aircraft.

    • @Goodfellow1234567
      @Goodfellow1234567 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @mw6563, how many car crashes occur in US daily? 6.1 million car accidents in US per year, almost 40k are fatal. The government didn't stop people from driving.

    • @chingtuckmeng1122
      @chingtuckmeng1122 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      we dont give a f about your US FAA

    • @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane
      @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The same FAA that allowed Boeing to certify itself?

    • @DaddyBear205
      @DaddyBear205 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This will never happen

  • @syncmaster915n
    @syncmaster915n หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Futuristic China 👍👍

  • @yukon4511
    @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    What are your range and duration numbers?

    • @james_l4337
      @james_l4337 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      30km for recent certified one (EH216-S) for inner city travel, tourism, 2 passengers. Max 130km/hr or 10m/sec
      ~50m height, depending on regulations.
      Mass production beginning this year
      AutoPilot another company (video public) prototype 250km, 5 passengers speed 200km/hr max 400kg
      For between cities travel & within
      estimate roll out 2026
      Etc.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@james_l4337 I anxiously await their sales figures.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@james_l4337 Wishing them all the success!

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@james_l4337 I anxiously await the sales figures.

    • @anthonyfernandez7833
      @anthonyfernandez7833 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@james_l4337 what about cost though?

  • @Xind0898
    @Xind0898 หลายเดือนก่อน

    isn't this essentially a electric and lite helicopter?

  • @usxyz_news
    @usxyz_news 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    🎉🎉

  • @allex2451
    @allex2451 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just a big drone huh!?

  • @graceantonio3573
    @graceantonio3573 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    ❤😊❤😂❤😊❤😂❤ WOW! ONLY IN CHINA I GUESS.... WHO CAN AFFORD IT IN PHILIPPINES? LOOKS REALY COOL & BEAT THE TRAFFIC HERE AHAHAHAAAAA!

  • @renealvarado3658
    @renealvarado3658 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Wow an helicopter 🚁 revolution 😂😂😂

    • @simonyapp
      @simonyapp หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      With far less noise, emissions and cost.

    • @renealvarado3658
      @renealvarado3658 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@simonyapp try to be close to an helicopter the amount of wind it generates is just to much to be effective for everyday transportation and it is still to noisy and the flying range is ridiculously dangerous and it decreases at each fly !

  • @ram50228
    @ram50228 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The key takeout is "tridimensional aerial traffic" to 2035; very impressive. In comparison, EEUU to date, does not even have high speed trains.

  • @udhelhc
    @udhelhc หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Go China, Go Ehang

  • @apemzheng7914
    @apemzheng7914 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    It seems like a bigger drones.😂

  • @rickdeckard9810
    @rickdeckard9810 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This better have a ballistic parachute.

    • @user-gf1zd7hm1e
      @user-gf1zd7hm1e หลายเดือนก่อน

    • @vervetech9395
      @vervetech9395 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most do

    • @yishujia186
      @yishujia186 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This thing is supposed to fly at low attitude. There will not be enough time for you to decelerate and land safely.

  • @praveeng340
    @praveeng340 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

  • @silentstormstudio4782
    @silentstormstudio4782 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Air taxi vs helicopter ?

  • @andyhughes1776
    @andyhughes1776 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Exposed spinning propellers so low to the ground present a serious safety issue.
    At least helicopter rotors spin above people's heads.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Indeed. You (and I) are the only people who seem to recognize this serious design fault.

    • @DemPilafian
      @DemPilafian หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you just turn your body sideways, there's more than enough space to get to the aircraft door without being turned into hamburger.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DemPilafian You first

    • @DemPilafian
      @DemPilafian หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@yukon4511 Eeew. Are you a cannibal?

    • @user-qv6ud2hx6f
      @user-qv6ud2hx6f หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There too many customers, so some will survive...

  • @ALWH1314
    @ALWH1314 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder how to police this, what kind of traffic rules like speed limit, traffic crossing, criminal activity….?

    • @hanfucolorful9656
      @hanfucolorful9656 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have to start from some points, and improving down the road.

  • @PaulADAigle
    @PaulADAigle หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why wouldn't you put the propellers above the cockpit? It seems safer that way.

    • @stephenchurchill682
      @stephenchurchill682 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My Guess: Because the batteries that supply the power in those arms are so heavy that if put overhead, the center of gravity will be too high.

    • @PaulADAigle
      @PaulADAigle หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stephenchurchill682 That would make sense, only those are what lift it.

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting that you don’t even have an engineering degree

    • @PaulADAigle
      @PaulADAigle หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wroughtforge7547 I don't? Says who?

  • @r.a.8618
    @r.a.8618 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Helicopter: uses internal combustion engine that consumes diesel and requires a pilot
    eVTOL: uses motors which consume electricity stored in batteries and doesn't need a pilot

  • @atiqulbasher
    @atiqulbasher หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    America: Let Market determine who is the winner!
    Also America: Stop China from entering our Markets!!

  • @Y2Kvids
    @Y2Kvids หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Taylor Swift watching carefully

  • @Neil.C57510
    @Neil.C57510 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    No roll cage, no shielded fans, no ballistic low/high parachutes + airbags. Your doomed if that falls out the sky.

    • @colin1235421
      @colin1235421 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Agree, safety needs to come first...

    • @Kabab
      @Kabab หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      While I'm not particularly keen on this company, it is an X16 craft which means it has essentially 4x redundancy. You can lose any 4 propellers/motors at a minimum and still land fine. You could probably lose a maximum of 10 propellers/motors and still get on the ground with minor to no injuries. At least this is how the craft should and probably is designed.
      A roll cage or parachute isn't going to make much if any difference if you fall from a height of ~200-300ft. The parachute will have very limited time to deploy even if it's predicted on time.
      All this being said, I would prefer a traditional helicopter with a very long proven track record

    • @zsarimaxim692
      @zsarimaxim692 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      So when are we going to have parachute for 747?

    • @merrick6484
      @merrick6484 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yellen is more worry about over capacity.😆

    • @Brad_Fallon
      @Brad_Fallon หลายเดือนก่อน

      Solid Hydrogen is the answer!

  • @dukbokki9281
    @dukbokki9281 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    EH stock going to the moon!

    • @supertec2023
      @supertec2023 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂😂 sure lol

    • @a.m.doesit9347
      @a.m.doesit9347 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Who's here cause they bought at 120$ and still bag holding

    • @EbenezerNimh
      @EbenezerNimh หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well see

  • @Brad_Fallon
    @Brad_Fallon หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If they used Solid Hydrogen and they could fly all day!

  • @young1151
    @young1151 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's going to take a single accident to bankrupt the company.

    • @user-gf1zd7hm1e
      @user-gf1zd7hm1e หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      有降落伞的,兄弟,发生事故可以安全降落

  • @a.m.doesit9347
    @a.m.doesit9347 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Whos here cause they bought @ 120 and still bag holding

    • @dukbokki9281
      @dukbokki9281 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hurry up and get in before it’s too late.

  • @ashishbhoi9565
    @ashishbhoi9565 หลายเดือนก่อน

    where are all the birds ?
    what if a bird hit the open propellers ?

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Vertical propellers don’t suck birds in like jet engines

    • @rschulzejr
      @rschulzejr หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@wroughtforge7547 With 8 motors, there is some redundancy. In certain cases you can lose 2 and descend in a spiral pattern. Or keep flying if they are on opposite sides

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rschulzejr
      If you still use propeller technology you are absolutely right. Except now in the 21st century, they use something called AI.

  • @supersmart671
    @supersmart671 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bring it to Kerala, India

  • @mxweng
    @mxweng หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope this is safe enough for average consumers; I don't want to be next Kobe Bryant.

  • @darwincorrealv
    @darwincorrealv หลายเดือนก่อน

    No thank you they're all yours 😊😊😊

  • @supertec2023
    @supertec2023 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Oh hell no.

  • @3066961
    @3066961 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    WAS he really inside????????

    • @jojo-ep2pp
      @jojo-ep2pp หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      watch more youtube videos about Ehang

    • @3066961
      @3066961 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jojo-ep2pp it's not helping

  • @tiramisu8359
    @tiramisu8359 หลายเดือนก่อน

    why not DJI scale up their drone to make it man size? they have all the expertise, data, and intelligence.

  • @TheBagOfHolding
    @TheBagOfHolding หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    How much can they lift and for how long or for what diatance? They need to prove its possible not show edited videos of people and empty crafts combined through editing.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding หลายเดือนก่อน

      @CandyKanette no they don't. They are all edited. Find a full flight with a person in one.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding หลายเดือนก่อน

      @CandyKanette you are mistaken. It's not possible for anyone because of the square cube law in physics. Find any video from anyone that it's possible. If it was there would be a full video of a full flight not videos edited with people and empty crafts. Find proof a person can get in one then take off and stay up 4 minutes. They will be edited if they even try to show that. You just think there is proof but you will not find any if you look l.

    • @ChinaSongsCollection
      @ChinaSongsCollection หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      That's a stupid comment.
      EHang has been operating commercially in the countryside in China for YEARS!!
      You can find western reporters flying in those EHang autonomous drones from at least 2 years ago on TH-cam.
      The certification for commercial operations is specifically for those cities concerned.
      (It never had permission to fly in the cities until now)

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ChinaSongsCollection lies. If it was operating for years then a tourist would upload a complete flight on a video. The only flights are edited and made by the company or shills.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ChinaSongsCollection what video do you think is proof? What is the title?

  • @DemPilafian
    @DemPilafian หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's both an air taxi and the world's largest hamburger maker.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The West would never accept such a design fault.

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Are you sure about that? It's flying in Spain already and has in the US...

  • @jagernautsteelfist3648
    @jagernautsteelfist3648 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    China really playing cyberpunk fr

  • @The38alt
    @The38alt หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's crazy you only put in where you're going. It's automated flight so what if it runs into another aircraft because of the system? What is the battery life cycle of each charge that they think it's a viable air transport

    • @ChinaSongsCollection
      @ChinaSongsCollection หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      This is actually NOT new.
      EHang has been operating in the countrysides of China for YEARS! And there's never been any issues.
      ( I don't know why the video didn't mention this.
      The certification for commercial operations is specifically for those cities concerned.
      As far as I know, the company has been in service for years! )

    • @Brad_Fallon
      @Brad_Fallon หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Solid Hydrogen and they could fly all day!

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      battery life? are you kidding? they go nowhere.

    • @Brad_Fallon
      @Brad_Fallon หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@yukon4511 HYDROGEN!

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Liquid or gasous?

  • @Ottovonostbahnhof
    @Ottovonostbahnhof หลายเดือนก่อน

    有商业化前景吗?珠海又要增加一个失败案例

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      None. No range, little payload, certain failure.

  • @somerset006
    @somerset006 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No worries. Teslas will fly AUTONOMOUSLY by the end of next year.

  • @abbeysekamatte8289
    @abbeysekamatte8289 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is an ad ! You guys aren't even shy about this ! CNBC !

    • @donkeykong516
      @donkeykong516 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is an excellent ad

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@donkeykong516 it's a deceptive ad. It's not possible to carry people for a duration or distance that would matter for travel anywhere.

    • @CNBCi
      @CNBCi  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We will always let you know if content is sponsored. We don't upload ads to our channel.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@CNBCi how long did you witness it carry a human passanger? How far did it take someone?

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      There are plenty of videos with passengers aboard, you're just lazy to find them. Plus this is a certified drone so if they say they can fly 30 km with people inside then I know I can trust it.

  • @yukon4511
    @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why won't you fly in your company's aircraft?

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Who told you this nonsense?

  • @Sr_art_3862
    @Sr_art_3862 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If it wants to becomes an air taxi. But cannot produced in high volumes. The logical consequence is the end price for consumers to pay will be much higher than regular land taxis due to high demand. Not many people can afford it. So how this type of aircraft can solve urban traffic congestions?

    • @meenakshikalita8353
      @meenakshikalita8353 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      If it can become like uber(air uber here)..atleast fare wise,many people will defintely use it and slowly it will become accessible to the masses.Provided it clears all the safety measures too

    • @jwt4377
      @jwt4377 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Currently, its fares are cheaper and shorter than ordinary taxis because air routes can be closer to straight lines.

    • @Betweoxwitegan
      @Betweoxwitegan หลายเดือนก่อน

      It can't, it's not even designed for that. This is just some idiots idea which sounded cool, looked cool and probably got a lot of government grants because it's seemingly technologically innovative, thus it becomes a status symbol that only the rich will buy and be able to afford. This is not a solution to traffic congestion because it's an inefficient form of transportation. its aim is to replace helicopters but is it even more efficient and commercially viable than a helicopter? The solution is public transportation not eVTOLS.

    • @adolft_official
      @adolft_official หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@meenakshikalita8353 Pajjeet Keep the streets clean in Inddia and wash left hand after wiping sh it

    • @seokjin3000
      @seokjin3000 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's available on Taobao right now. The EH216-S.

  • @Cdictator
    @Cdictator หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is just a large drone. Can’t carry a person on it 😢

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Why's that? Who told you??? People already fly in it...

  • @alhavana9426
    @alhavana9426 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Lemme guess !! 20min of flight time then 6hrs of charge 😂

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      15

    • @herrwolf5184
      @herrwolf5184 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you underestimate battery technology

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@herrwolf5184 Please explain it to me.

    • @FabioCapela
      @FabioCapela หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yukon4511 Recharging should be 30 minutes or less assuming a powerful enough charger. It doesn't make much sense to charge faster anyway because there's an inspection between landing and taking off.
      How much time it takes for a battery to charge (or safely discharge) doesn't depend on how big it is, but rather on the chemistry and how powerful the charger is. Given the same chemistry and a powerful enough charger, an AAA battery driving a tiny toy car and a container-sized battery driving a large electric cargo ship charge in the same time.

  • @sunnyskye213
    @sunnyskye213 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    FLY, HIGH WITH A-I BUT ON A-I DO NADA R-E-L-Y.......😮😢

  • @bogdanivchenko3723
    @bogdanivchenko3723 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    2:55 you see how there are 2 headphones? He didn't fly it.

    • @FabioCapela
      @FabioCapela หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's autonomous. You don't fly it, you just get inside and it takes you to your destination.

    • @vervetech9395
      @vervetech9395 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You weren't listening 😂

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One is for the other passenger

  • @yukon4511
    @yukon4511 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What makes you think a 15 minute flight ONLY to a location with a fast charger is a marketable product?

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      What makes you feel everyone needs to fly 2 hours to a destination? Plenty of situations when you just need to cross a channel, island hopping, tourism, getting from a city center to an airport, all these and more can be just a few kilometers away.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @petrbecak7092 well, one reason is no other company has ever dared market a 20 mile aircraft. Then add 1 to 2 hours of charging on every flight, and you have an unmarkeyable product. For 400 grand? Please!

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@yukon4511How about Volocopter which is second behind Ehang in AAM reality index? "Range: 27 km (17 m) Flight Time: 27 minutes."

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@petrbecak7092 How can you fly people to an airport in an aircraft that has no provision for baggage?

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@yukon4511 not true, there's a space for luggage... not a large one though...

  • @mahtabhussain4812
    @mahtabhussain4812 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Our future cars

  • @ronglenn919
    @ronglenn919 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All we have in the USA are guns and boats..

  • @yukon4511
    @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    After years of developement, they post a video with no indication of passengers in flight. Should be clear to the world that
    this craft can lift batteries or people, but not both.

    • @seokjin3000
      @seokjin3000 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      A simple search results in many videos. They're already being used in Dubai. CNBC chose to post this particular video.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @seokjin3000 What's your point? Battery-powered flying cars don't work.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@seokjin3000 they are not being used. Why wouldn't a tourist or passanger make a video of their trip on one? Anyone that rode something like that would record it. It's fraudulent vaporware.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@seokjin3000 no such video exists.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@seokjin3000 Indeed. A simple search will reveal these toys will not carry people and batteries.

  • @RSCB
    @RSCB หลายเดือนก่อน

    w helicopter

  • @MonacoPoker
    @MonacoPoker 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Where is Elon Musk ?

  • @1ndragunawan
    @1ndragunawan หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Certified by Chinese Aviation Authority, which means it's legal to fly only in China.

    • @mountainclimber4511
      @mountainclimber4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah because each country's CAA has its own requirements, so even the cover China its a big market and then some other countries

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They don’t have this technology anywhere else.

    • @DaddyBear205
      @DaddyBear205 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The rest of the world will be left behind

    • @1ndragunawan
      @1ndragunawan หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaddyBear205 unlikely, since there are so many startups on Earth making this kind of vehicle.

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      How many of these are already certified?

  • @K4R3N
    @K4R3N หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Saw what happend to Kobe, you're not fooling me into this 🚁 ☠️

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      But he was flying a helicopter, right? Do you know of any safety redundancy in helicopters?

  • @kevinlin4895
    @kevinlin4895 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Entity list

  • @charmingjr7443
    @charmingjr7443 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No safety precautions were taken into account during the building of this aircraft. Exposed😮 blades 😂 could kill one easily in an event of crash or something 😢😂

    • @iyansetiadi1986
      @iyansetiadi1986 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So is helicopter.

    • @charmingjr7443
      @charmingjr7443 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@iyansetiadi1986 helicopter 🚁 blade are above n big, while this is at the sides. 😅

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The difference is that helicopter rotors often spin even when people get into it unlike Ehang. Plus Ehang rotors are so short and light that they stop spinning quickly after landing. This is a certified drone so this issue has already been resolved.

  • @XAirForce
    @XAirForce หลายเดือนก่อน

    You know I’m doing artwork about all this and it’s getting harder and harder to catch up with all the robots and EVTOLS being released 😮😅 @WHITEHOUSE hey I need an old Air Force Base to do product unboxing. 😂. I need hangers to put robots and aircraft into so they don’t get dusty.😅. Oh wait you don’t get a fly this. Fail! 😂

  • @mikeliu4261
    @mikeliu4261 หลายเดือนก่อน

    soon this company will be blacklisted by US politicians

  • @plethoracopius6268
    @plethoracopius6268 หลายเดือนก่อน

    F**king background music**

  • @MegaPapa8888
    @MegaPapa8888 หลายเดือนก่อน

    CHINA IS WAY AHEAD OF US IN LOW ATTITUDE TRAVEL.

  • @I1sAd4mmZX_
    @I1sAd4mmZX_ หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nope not for me…

  • @user-mw4ki4fb7y
    @user-mw4ki4fb7y 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Spies

  • @rustynuts4426
    @rustynuts4426 หลายเดือนก่อน

    but what is china doing about the falling population?

    • @alhkcblack9617
      @alhkcblack9617 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Making lots of robots 😂

  • @JarawanYT
    @JarawanYT หลายเดือนก่อน

    Helicopter Pilot loosing there job soon 😔

    • @LanNguyen-vd4zt
      @LanNguyen-vd4zt หลายเดือนก่อน

      There have been numerous VTOL for a decades. This isn’t the first one or the best one. Do some research.

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Has there already been a fully certified evtol? Please elaborate...

  • @bigboss-oz2vi
    @bigboss-oz2vi หลายเดือนก่อน

    what a joke its a oversized drone

  • @Brad_Fallon
    @Brad_Fallon หลายเดือนก่อน

    Solid Hydrogen and they could fly all day!

  • @TheBagOfHolding
    @TheBagOfHolding หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Show a person get in one then take off then fly 5 minutes then land all in one unedited video. Until someone accomplishes this simple feat they are vaporware. A.tourist would record their complete flight wonder why none have. All evtol for humans to ride in are vaporware.

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Why would anyone want this nonsense? Please show me a video of o person getting in a car then riding through a city and then getting off within one unaudited video...

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @petrbecak7092 people make videos delivering food in cars and their are entitr channels devoted to it. People review cars they bought. Has a customer reviewed their evtol? They are being sold right? Who bought one?

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @petrbecak7092 there is a video of the tesla semi making a complete trip. There are plenty of videos.

  • @AndrewLambert-wi8et
    @AndrewLambert-wi8et หลายเดือนก่อน

    400 000 USA DOLLARS? STUPID!

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If it were free, it would fail.

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Why?

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Truly stupidly cheap!! ... If you can take tourists for a 10-minute ride for say $50 dollars each, you don't need a pilot then take 45 minutes sleep until next tourists turn up... It's $800/day or $160000 a year revenue easily achievable in tourist hotspots. Still consider it expensive? I'd buy it myself...

  • @Johnfulkan283
    @Johnfulkan283 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So it's a cheap helicopter

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I would say both have their use case. Eh-216 is for short distance, safe, economic travel.

  • @topofthegreen
    @topofthegreen หลายเดือนก่อน

    pilots are doomed, no more jobs.

  • @nucu9407
    @nucu9407 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The US :" It's a national security threat to the US and our lapdogs. It must be owned by the Americans or we'll have the world to outflank Ehang!"

  • @user-cn9hz4zw8i
    @user-cn9hz4zw8i หลายเดือนก่อน

    too expensive to our Chinese ,maybe american can affordable this thing

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It's not supposed to substitute cars but if you want to get to the airport from a city center quickly I can't think of a better way if there's no reliable fast public transport available.

  • @mikezhang2351
    @mikezhang2351 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂