Success is not built on success. It's built on failure, It's built on fraustration. it's built on fear that you have to overcome. I pray that anyone who reads this will be successful in life
Why wouldnt our government be able to detect what these are and where the took off or landed from? They are claiming they dont know their origin. Why are they not shooting them down this looks like a standard drone just larger in size.
I havent seen any videis of suv sized drones. I have seen drones flying in tight groups. Ive seen video of airplanes. I think what we have is very tral drone sightings combined with a little paranoia and people flying personal drones all mixed together causing panic
@Watcher 30 years? the tech already exist, these quads can detect thing and safely navigate without crashing and land or fly in perfect formations in autopilot, the future of flying pods will be automated.
Does it come with an automatic deploying parachute in case something malfunctions or it hits a bird? I think that would increase the confidence of a lot of people trying to fly it.
Do birds have accidents when they are flying and minding their business but happen to fly into another group of birds? Or do they have their own built-in sensors to avoid these kinds of collisions before they happen? 🤔 Well this vehicle should have the appropriate sensors available, but In case it doesn't, I'm willing to bet that the horrific noise made by the propellers is going to be enough for any bird to sense. This isn't going to be traveling at jet plane speeds. I'd say most helicopters could move quicker. Between the top speed and top noise it makes, I believe we can look at birds as being intelligent enough to look out for themselves in this kind of hazardous interaction. Parachutes? Marty, where we're going, we won't need parachutes.
To make this better, install the propellers inside it. And make sure they are covered with something like plastic or metal so that nobody who comes near it gets killed or severely injured.
Imagine how many people can actually drive it.... 1. have money, 2. Can't be blind, 3. You probably have to pass some complicated bullshit flying test. The safety hazards alone this thing will cause. Don't forget 2000 for insurance a month.
I feel like everyone is blinded by the surface level flashiness of the futuristic concept and doesn't even think for the 2 seconds it takes to realize just how bad of an idea this is
In the flying demo it looked liked no one was in it. I can also just imagine people accidentally walking into those propellers when spinning and the mess afterwards.
It will never be.. imagine someone own it and forgot to do regular maintenance? Flying machine is complex beast, one part is fail, u basically have a flying coffin
They are probably quite safe. Just so you know, this is actually NOT the first flying car. Another Chinese company (I think it's EHang) has been operating a flying taxi in China for at least 2 years. However as far as I know, they still haven't got a licence to fly in the cites. So they only operate out in the countryside. But the point is, there have been no accidents yet. So maybe they are safer than they look. ( By the way, not sure if they are still in operation though because I wouldn't think too many people have used their service ).
@Kenton Kirkpatrick Well, I wouldn't even volunteer to take a ride in a good sunny day. Forget about stormy days. I was just trying to point out the fact that flying taxis have been in operation in China for quite some time. So presumably they are probably quite safe. But just because they seem quite safe, it doesn't mean you would trust them enough to try. As I said, I don't know if they are still in operation because I would assume not too many people would want to try.
For those with inquiring minds that want to know, regarding navigation aid, green represents starboard/right side; red represents port/left side. So, this new air taxi vehicle only takes 3 hours to charge, but we only have about 35 minutes of flying time. I say that is great for an emergency 1 time vehicle use for clear air traffic known flight distance, meaning very short trips. Currently too pricey, I will check back once its charging capacity is much shorter and its flying time is much longer.
Only as far as you have to turn around and return to base ...so it's actually 10 minutes downrange and then you are bingo battery life and you have to turn around and hesd back to base ...because I promise you that you will want at least 5 minutes of battery if left when you get back to the landing zone in case something happens that you have to change plans for where you are going to land this thing..like weather or wind speeds ect
@fladave99 Right on ..love it somebody has some knowledge in these comments. Throw a couple Rotax engines on it and 75 gallons of av gas and now you would have something
those guys making the jetpacks need to work on these flying cars. i can see 4 jets all around, & maybe a few more underneath these new flying cars instead of propellers.
@@bobydown3749 too small and too short of flight time. They have years to do before it is air taxi quality. Air taxis will be the first things you see more than personal ownership unless you live in Dubai or UAE
We will all be dead if that ever happens. It will be 100s of years from now if ever. They can not even keep up with the airplanes in the sky, how are they going to monitor vehicles. It will be balloons all over.
OR you can deploy safety features like you would an aircraft, which remember carries >95% accident survival rating. --science from REAL experts Also crashing and burning - that's only in movies
@Johnny it can work on 3 rotors, but it has 8 for redundancy and a bit more...they have said making it safe as it can be is number one priority otherwise it could seriously harm getting flying cars widespread...one accident could destroy so much progress.
On the video it is daid that it was a prototype and there are new models coming soon with wheels, so there's that. But yeah this prototype looks a lot like a drone
It's been anticipated on for 100 years, nice to finally see something tangible in my lifetime, it's still a work in progress as he said, but it's a start non the less. I think it's cool.
I honestly think we will have flying cars and air lanes (and licenses needed for it) within next 10/20 years Hopefully within 10 years il be 49 then. I or atleast within our lifetime. Something like fith element
@@jayjunior2023 only the top of the top are gonna own these things…they’re not letting regular pedestrians purchase and fly these like cars that’s not happening for a longggg time
Just thinking of something with such high tech safety features still producing a scary reaction to actually being up in the air and I have renewed respect for pilots throughout the 20th century.
Just to be clear the green navigation lights are on the right because green navigation lights lights are always on the right. When you are looking forwards from inside the craft. Red is always on the left looking forwards from inside the cockpit. It’s easy to remember when you know the true history. Port and starboard come from the nautical history of shipping. In the early days of ships the rudder wasn’t located at the back enter as all ships are today. It was a large steer board located on the right hand side of the large boat. Such as a vicking ship. Because the steer board was located on the right hand side it could not dock on the steer board side as the steer board would get bashed against the dock. This is why the left hand side of a ship is called port the ships would only tie up against the dock on the port side to protect the steer board side. Now known as starboard. The drink of port is red which is why port is red and starboard is green. As you look forwards from within the craft. The presenter got his port and starboard mixed up. Green is never on the left as the presenter stated. He stated this because he was looking back at the craft and said Green was on the lift. He should have said it’s on the right but maybe saying it while looking forwards. 😂
I would like to second owensmith's comments above. Mariners need to know the "rules of the road" for safe navigation. Red is located on the left, Green on the right as you drive the vehicle. These rules - it would appear - will be used for these flying vehicles. It is critical that these rules be understood and followed by the pilots of these flying cars. Thank you owensmith for highlighting this most critical aspect of safety.
Imagine how much less space cars have to maneuver in. The first person to predict people were going to drive on very narrow lanes over 60mph for sometimes 4 hours straight would have been labelled as a madman.
That's what people thought about cars going over 70mph legally also at one point. Too dangerous. But tech advances over time. We won't be grounded forever....
I was at a party ( in the 90's)next door to Opalocka airport in Miami and arrived 15 minutes after this poor guy had parked his bike and had walked too close to a cessna propellor; ripped his arm clean off...I heard he was suicidal for awhile... when they start mass- producing these, they need to put fan guards on these things.
I am pretty sure they will have all sorts of sensors on them, when they detect someone is coming close, they should instantly stop. Just like modern sawblades, they automatically and instantly stop if your finger gets too close by accident.
i’m pretty sure regulators will have to produce set of standards based on accident rates and they’ll probably create some testing and rules you have to follow to get overall air accidents within acceptable range or safety levels. for example, like modern road car automatic safety braking if you get too close to another car but on steroids.
Are there any safety features to prevent accidents? If the propellers stop working, does it have parachutes that are effective to avoid crashes? Any backup failures or redundancy? Location tracker? Etc?
When it saves you an hour in traffic, you’ll think it’s more efficient for your lifestyle, unless you enjoy sitting on the highway in stop and go traffic. Maybe you do prefer that to just a 20 minute flight straight from work to home at the end of the day.
They can have docking stations in many places where the pilot can land, and have an assistant quickly swap his flat battery for a pre-charged one. The assistant will take flat battery and charge it for pilot on return journey. Additionally, he could park flying car on roof of a high rise parking lot and charge on electric pod.
We are in the end stage of electric vehicle development. It's about as useful as it was in 1900 when it was first being developed. In other words, the fad will be gone soon enough.
Very interesting! Bird, during each move of wings, moves center of mass lower, when wings are higher, thus self-balancing of changed degrees of position naturally comes and bird goes straight without dangerous changes of direction of flight to left, right, front and back sides and between. Thus it would be nice to make something similar. Another thing you can do is to change, smash, dissolve redirecting, deviations of vectors by some rotation. You know this funny thing rotating on table, you can touch with self-balancing. Birds can't do this trick and it is a bit more complex task. It is connected to dynamic contours. Btw, this toy on table could be much more efficient if two contours were moved in opposite direction with same speed. As it balances axis rotation changes. Actually you need to understand that sides of toy that received deviation go to opposite side self-balancing it by same force. In dynamics without interruption of toy points, particles, parts. So, if you touch toy, side receiving inertia to upper direction goes to lower position lifting it higher, while part that received intertia to bottom direction goes to opposite side upper. With direction to bottom. It goes with all particles with different vectors qnd inertia and smooth change of it. 😏
You said it... "Love to watch". Don't know about getting in one tho. At least not at first, let others try it first, and second, and third, and so on. Maybe after many try it, maybe and that's a serious MAYBE, I'll eventually try it. I don't feel comfortable riding in a shuttle on land without a driver, to get one in the sky, you're gonna have to knock me out like Mr. T on the A-Team. "I pitty the fool", that tries to get me in one of those.
It's just a glorified concept. People make stupid things while driving a car on an empty road. Imagine giving a flying machine to everyone. No way. No more energy? You fall like brick, potentially killing other people. And what about those nice rotating blades, completely exposed with zero protection. It's a death trap.
Looking quickly without analyzing it any longer, I realize that the propellers must be protected like a fan because any object, or bird, can break them. The doors should not open upwards because an opening in the air could either create resistance with the opposing air mass, or they could break (even one of them) and cause a major imbalance and accident. Opening the doors prevents rapid ejection or even aborting for parachute use. The idea is good in terms of vertical take-off and futuristic related to vertical displacement. But it requires great development in ideas. I would prefer to create something different, with force transfer in the event of a collision and I would not use propellers but rather a means using what gases already do without any man manipulating them. We have everything there in nature and certain animals like birds put on a show for us and we complicate things by not using the obvious. Of course, we don't need to fly little or slowly like birds, but we have the cognition to understand how gases work, just as we create instant messages through the internet, we can use the molecules of the atmosphere as a road, just by studying a lot about them. I practiced paragliding and after many years I began to see that I was a prisoner of the thermals and this started to bother me because in the time I was flying, I was only carried by a paraglider made with about 80 cells that trapped the air and They took vertical and rotating flight in thermals and then I started to descend and descend until I landed. So there is something natural, as natural as the molecules on the ground, whose atoms are at high speed and we do not notice it, and whose planet Earth and the entire universe is subject to forces that, if studied well beyond what Einstein proposed, we will easily reach any place in the universe. Remembering that centuries ago the internet, instant dialogue, was just fiction. So what I think now may just be current fiction. But it all depends on study, a lot of study.
Ich bin recht sicher in 3 bis 4 Jahren sind Akkus verfügbar die gut für 1 bis 2 Stunden fliegen sind !!! Leider bin ich zu alt um es zu kaufen !!! In der BRD wird dann sowieso irgend eine Vorschrift, fliegen nur ganz wenigen möglich sein,!!!!!
What are you stupid. I’m not being smart I know you’re not stupid but think about it. Would you want to be walking out of a bar and somebody’s drunk and takes off. And there goes your head. Rolling down the ground down the road. And then he killed a couple other people on the way. And then goes home and his kids run out mommy daddy pop snap crackle there goes their heads rolling down the lawn. No thank you. This is a big mistake they don’t even have guards around the blades
Sounds exactly like a helicopter too. No practical use. We already have a helicopter for that. Unless they invented some sort of mchine that uses levitation. Not practicable as we already have helicopter
Thank you for your enthusiasm... yes, it is extremely appealing and must be intimidating at first try! I would gladly buy one for sure if I can afford it.I would prefer from far some anti-gravity vehicles when they will be made, it should be safer. It is a good start anyway, what a nice job here. May the Force be with you!
@Chris Knight but,what happens when ur car malfunctions, like engine dies or run out fuel or whatever? You'd just fall straight down to ur death.imagine the risk hitting people on the ground
@@paulsmith9192 yep. How crappy people maintain their cars now? When pilots currently go up in a small plane, there is an elaborate checklist. I'm sure the people who always run late and zig zag through traffic now, will realize the error in their ways, and get up an hour earlier so they can incorporate a "pre-flight Checklist" into their daily routine....
@vix altaris monumentum monstrantum um, there is no wing. You would have to have a very large glider wing, much bigger than a normal glider, plus the flying car simply is not designed anything like a plane , with a slightly nose heavy axis, a tail, ailerons, etc. It just doesn't work that way at all. It will tumble out of control, more or less straight down.
@@maxellray: Some companies are working on genuine dual-purpose flying cars that can go on roads and take to the air - there are videos about them . . .
@axeljohnson2184 I actually do fly helicopters, and I can say from experience it's literally the same feeling as driving a car when you're high up. Hovering, landing and taking off is obviously different, but you can actually take off a helicopter similar to a plane if you want. They 100% feel like cars in the sky, and they are.
This prototype is literally a huge drone. The safety aspects raise my concerns. 1. Not seeing any crash landing features. 2. No controller for maneuver flying 3. The G impact supported by the structure and seat.
Cars driving is also an accident waiting to happen. Cars are way more dangerous as they actually often are close to pedestrians. This thing is up in the sky 99% of the time.
Это сколько шума будет в городе ! Теперь при аварии эти штуковины будут падать на головы людей ! Первыми этой штуковиной воспользуются террористы , напичкают взрывчаткой и прилетят в толпу людей !
From both a safety and mechanical engineering point of view, providing shrouds around the 'propellers' would mitigate the potential for injury to pedestrians, whilst providing more downward thrust, since the air would now be more concentrated by the enclosure. A bit like a jet engine but with the mechanism providing the thrust, oriented vertically, rather than horizontally, as per a jet.
Ma penso che questo prototipo possa volare solo su zone private. Ma basterebbe mettere una carrozzeria che inglobi le eliche per risolvere il problema...
@@phyl1283 if they use jets instead this will be real sci-fi flying cars finally. Hopefully the designers & engineers can work with the people making those jetpack suits in Dubai. They just had the first jetpack race in history a few days ago.
I have a question for anyone who has knowledge about it... Why dont we use fuel for such huge drones? Wouldnt that be a better option that can let the "flying car" fly for an extended period of time?
Weight and space for fuel. Also fuel burns. So engines needs more maintaince and will produce more heat and carbon emmissions. Not efficient for mass usage Edit: can work on better batteries
a jet engine has to be service every month since any failure mean death, it not cheap to own a helicopter for this reason. the advance of electric motors is they are decentralised (no single engine driving all the blade), even if 2 motor fails, the craft can still fly and land safely.
@@hungrybearcircus8427 But the weight of the batteries which are needed for a flight are much more heavier than the weight we need for fuel, otherwise we would have had planes working on electricity.
@@hungrybearcircus8427 that doesn't explain airplanes though. You can't even control where this little thing is going like a helicopter for example! The car is already carbon fiber, so how is that a reason why it can't be gas...
Would you need a pilot license for this thing? Also I'm nervous at times driving on land let alone flying. The risk seems astronomical (no pun intended)
I believe a number of SciFi stories had expected us to have flying cars by now. But this prototype does just seem like someone enlarged a typical personal drone, but added carbon fiber, racing seats, and some Tesla tech to make it human ridable. If my drone had carbon fiber blades they'd last longer. I get the feeling that the propeller blades are rather dangerous and could pose a threat to keeping one's head. At the end of the day, this is just so darn cool. I can't wait to see what they do to make it a real flying car. I am expecting that when you are stuck in traffic on the ground, you push some toggle switches, and you do a vertical take-off and fly off to your meeting at Spacely's Space Sprockets. Hmmm, but with the advances in AI technology will we really need to go to work to push buttons like George Jetson was expected to do? Important issues to ponder.
Movies flying car is just not plausible, the most energy efficient method to hover an object will always be helicopter/drone based. Im pretty sure if they want to make a movielike jet-powered car, they can already do that, but the amount of pollution and energy consumption just to hover the object would be through the roof.
For this to be considered a "flying car" it needs to have wheels it's more of a mini-helicopter. It should have been labelled as a component towards the progression of flying cars not the actual flying car.
Looks more like an advance helicopter than a flying car. The blades on the sides is extremely unsafe, but I know there will be a work around on this. This is going to be a pretty good vehicle when it's done.
@@edwards.8801 uhhh...could take some time in my opinion. I'm 35. When I was a kid in the 90s flying cars were "right around the corner." I'm thinking mass adoption is around the year 2099, but that's just me... maybe sooner, maybe only the very wealthy, only time will tell.
Can't wait to see the owners that will own one & paint it with amazing designs 😍 🙌 ✨️ The paint already Looks amazing 👏🏽 🤩 but I'm sure it won't take long for owners to Send Them For a Paint Job. ❤
This is actually very exciting! But there are soooo many things about it that need to be redesigned especially that flying time, it being so loud, and the propellers need an enclosed design for safety, their exposure could kill someone if they get too close. Congratulations China! 👏👏👏👏👏!
NAV has to develop a lot to really get flying cars to work, but once NAV is up to speed, this is the future, for sure. You can’t have people flying these without a ton of assistance, obviously.
The concern regarding propellers as a potential safety issue is indeed valid and warrants careful consideration. In the design and operation of air shuttles, the safety of both passengers and bystanders is paramount. Innovations in air shuttle technology often include measures such as enclosing the propellers to minimize the risk of accidents, as well as implementing rigorous safety protocols and emergency systems designed to protect against propeller-related hazards. Moreover, ongoing research and development are continuously enhancing the safety features of these vehicles, ensuring that the propellers, while essential for flight, do not compromise the overall safety and reliability of air shuttle services.
@@torrinashcraft5677 The Mollar Skycar has been in development for 40 years and has never achieved free flight or gone into production. The developer of the Skycar is now accused of deliberate fraud. - Wikipedia
This thing just looks like a giant drone more than a flying car to me.
True, if we wanted to call any flying vehicule a "car", then helicopters are already there.
And what do you want the difference to be?
We can have flying cars, they'd just be too loud
@@cedriceric9730 personally I would expect a flying car to have some car-like properties, like the ability to drive down a road.
that's the best practice for flying car actually, a practical solution for city airway transportation
This is probably what’s being flown over New Jersey RN
no,drones spotted of jersey are in the air for over 7 hours
@tailzgamez4756 true he siad 35 minutes
Exactly what they are
Cap
These can only stay in the air for 25 minutes the ones in new jersey are in the air for likes 8 hours
Success is not built on success. It's built on failure, It's built on fraustration. it's built on fear that you have to overcome. I pray that anyone who reads this will be successful in life
And I can even say she is the sincere broker I know....
Mrs Victoria is obviously the best
I invested $10,100 with her and she made profit of $53,000 for me just in 5days
Her successful story is everywhere.!
She's trust worthy and best option ever seen.!!
Jersey drones brought me here!
Guess it's their Christmas marketing campaign!
Same
@@blaquekatz9410dude said 2024 and this videos 2 years old
Are these flying over Jersey?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Why wouldnt our government be able to detect what these are and where the took off or landed from? They are claiming they dont know their origin. Why are they not shooting them down this looks like a standard drone just larger in size.
I havent seen any videis of suv sized drones. I have seen drones flying in tight groups. Ive seen video of airplanes.
I think what we have is very tral drone sightings combined with a little paranoia and people flying personal drones all mixed together causing panic
Can you imagine how loud the world will be with these flying around everywhere?
i think it would be quieter
@@thatguy363 ask Elon. Is a helicopter quiet?
@@Simple_Dave_Jr Who?
@Watcher 30 years? the tech already exist, these quads can detect thing and safely navigate without crashing and land or fly in perfect formations in autopilot, the future of flying pods will be automated.
@@Simple_Dave_Jr ask ur mom about my helicopter
Does it come with an automatic deploying parachute in case something malfunctions or it hits a bird? I think that would increase the confidence of a lot of people trying to fly it.
CAUTION: Beware of bots in this comment section.
I would have recommended it to be armored but then the weight will be too much eix
Do birds have accidents when they are flying and minding their business but happen to fly into another group of birds? Or do they have their own built-in sensors to avoid these kinds of collisions before they happen? 🤔
Well this vehicle should have the appropriate sensors available, but In case it doesn't, I'm willing to bet that the horrific noise made by the propellers is going to be enough for any bird to sense. This isn't going to be traveling at jet plane speeds. I'd say most helicopters could move quicker. Between the top speed and top noise it makes, I believe we can look at birds as being intelligent enough to look out for themselves in this kind of hazardous interaction.
Parachutes? Marty, where we're going, we won't need parachutes.
What about people under you?
it come voice commands "Eject! Eject! " function, once you said the magic words, you will out of the car flying by your ownself 😂
Are these the things flying around New Jersey right now ?? The big drones the size of a car ??!!! 😮😮😮
To make this better, install the propellers inside it. And make sure they are covered with something like plastic or metal so that nobody who comes near it gets killed or severely injured.
That is point.
So true
Im not satisfy with there propellers its fail for me..
Yes, it needs cowling things on them. Very dangerous! For both passengers and the public.
What if the hole car lands in your head?
The amount of issues this thing can cause and have is mind blowing...
Yep imagine the repairs.
Imagine how many people can actually drive it.... 1. have money, 2. Can't be blind, 3. You probably have to pass some complicated bullshit flying test. The safety hazards alone this thing will cause. Don't forget 2000 for insurance a month.
@@OSU2010 I'm actually watching a video on a steam car! Get this a steam car is more safer and environmentally friendly then a electric car!!
@@OSU2010 And imagine you get hit by one of the propellers
I feel like everyone is blinded by the surface level flashiness of the futuristic concept and doesn't even think for the 2 seconds it takes to realize just how bad of an idea this is
I've been seeing videos for similar vehicles for years, but they never seem to get beyond prototype stage.
you are right all talk talk but no fly ?check BMW
In the flying demo it looked liked no one was in it. I can also just imagine people accidentally walking into those propellers when spinning and the mess afterwards.
Said everyone about every technology before they got beyond prototype stage hahaha, they ain't makin toasters
It will never be.. imagine someone own it and forgot to do regular maintenance? Flying machine is complex beast, one part is fail, u basically have a flying coffin
@@_slier I have to agree. If your road car engine fails your car just stops. If the rotors stop turning on this flying car you fall like a rock..
Those Blades gon tear somebody up.
Parking damage just got a whole new meaning.
Especially birds 😂
Yes ...I believe the real future of airborne personal vehicles is magnetic
Imagine the sound of these starting up in your street at 7am for work
Lol
They electric prob not to loud
@@dusk1673 did y0u not watch the video of it starting up ?
@@dusk1673 even my dji mini pro 3 can be heard from a good distance
Keep imagining bc only the rich are going to have these
Waiting to see this fly in heavy rain and/or wind. They always show them flying in perfect weather.
Or snow!😂
Absolutely. Or a storm!
They are probably quite safe.
Just so you know, this is actually NOT the first flying car.
Another Chinese company (I think it's EHang) has been operating a flying taxi in China for at least 2 years.
However as far as I know, they still haven't got a licence to fly in the cites. So they only operate out in the countryside.
But the point is, there have been no accidents yet. So maybe they are safer than they look.
( By the way, not sure if they are still in operation though because I wouldn't think too many people have used their service ).
@@ChinaSongsCollection So, you volunteer to take a ride in a thunderstorm? Be sure to get that on your cell phone.
@Kenton Kirkpatrick Well, I wouldn't even volunteer to take a ride in a good sunny day. Forget about stormy days.
I was just trying to point out the fact that flying taxis have been in operation in China for quite some time. So presumably they are probably quite safe.
But just because they seem quite safe, it doesn't mean you would trust them enough to try.
As I said, I don't know if they are still in operation because I would assume not too many people would want to try.
For those with inquiring minds that want to know, regarding navigation aid, green represents starboard/right side; red represents port/left side. So, this new air taxi vehicle only takes 3 hours to charge, but we only have about 35 minutes of flying time. I say that is great for an emergency 1 time vehicle use for clear air traffic known flight distance, meaning very short trips. Currently too pricey, I will check back once its charging capacity is much shorter and its flying time is much longer.
Do you know how far in the air you can travel in 35 minutes?
Only as far as you have to turn around and return to base ...so it's actually 10 minutes downrange and then you are bingo battery life and you have to turn around and hesd back to base ...because I promise you that you will want at least 5 minutes of battery if left when you get back to the landing zone in case something happens that you have to change plans for where you are going to land this thing..like weather or wind speeds ect
Battery is not a problem because Tesla will sell this company a long range battery. This is just a demo battery.
@fladave99 Right on ..love it somebody has some knowledge in these comments. Throw a couple Rotax engines on it and 75 gallons of av gas and now you would have something
@fladave99 Mills LMAO some dam funny sarcasm right there!
15 mins away 15 mins to go back and charge hit aye it’s a start and the design pimp great job creators 🙇♀️👍❤️
those guys making the jetpacks need to work on these flying cars.
i can see 4 jets all around, & maybe a few more underneath these new flying cars instead of propellers.
Finally!! All my favorite 80's movies led me to believe this was going to happen by the late 90's!
We’ve arrived! The future is here 👍
@@WOLFanddBEAR its a big drone, not anti gravity. the future you were shown is still far far away
@@possiblyinsane6995 yeah, I realised that after watching the whole thing, sadly.
Have you seen the Fifth Element with Bruce Willis? OMG , it was my favorite movie! Love them flying cars!!!!
Not impressed unless you can actually time travel when you hit 88 mph.
It is amazing for how long this channels has been around, the crazy amount of money it made but they still didn t buy a mic
1980: in the future we will have flying cars!
2022:
Still waiting.
You getting a drone hybrid car and you’ll be happy
Btter we use jetson, most simple flying car
@@bobydown3749 too small and too short of flight time. They have years to do before it is air taxi quality. Air taxis will be the first things you see more than personal ownership unless you live in Dubai or UAE
@@robertchiarizia9463 Not possible, the noise pollution would be insane.
Where can I buy one of these? I'm planning a trip to New Jersey soon.
Will love to see how the first air lane "road" rage is handled.
gonna end with الله أكبر
We will all be dead if that ever happens. It will be 100s of years from now if ever. They can not even keep up with the airplanes in the sky, how are they going to monitor vehicles. It will be balloons all over.
AI
"That skyway's jamed it's gonna take us forever to get there."-doc brown
Star wars hell yeah
"If a rotor stops working how far will it take you?" -- "All the way to the scene of the crash" -- Ron White
you are so funny . it was a good one...
Ron white didn’t come up with that
OR you can deploy safety features like you would an aircraft, which remember carries >95% accident survival rating. --science from REAL experts
Also crashing and burning - that's only in movies
@Johnny it can work on 3 rotors, but it has 8 for redundancy and a bit more...they have said making it safe as it can be is number one priority otherwise it could seriously harm getting flying cars widespread...one accident could destroy so much progress.
For a second I thought you were going to say Ron Burgundy
Wanting one of these since I was 12 years old. Finally!
Thanks!
A flying car would have wheels that can drive like a car and then fly like a plane upon command. This is just a nice looking helicopter.
uhhhh it has wheels that it can use to drive? it can fly in the air? seems like a flying car to me...
🎯
It's just a prototype man. It's not the finished car. The real car will have wheels
Like Waterman's Arrowbile in 1937?
But you don't need wheel if you can fly. The only challenge is battery technology to last longer, lighter material.
I remember as a little kid I always dreamt about this. Never knew it would happen so soon. Truly monumental.
Its a helicopter drone….not a car
Eh, about the same as a helicopter
@@Ben-fq1lj I don’t really care that it’s the same as a helicopter, I honestly think it just looks really cool
@@vectorphoenix5992 Worse. Way less efficient in terms of energy per weight. And cannot auto-rotate at all.
A monumental mess !
Dyson watching it and be like, I'm gonna make this bladeless.
😆
And add 4-wheels
😂😂😂
Paul Moller & Moller Skycar m400
lol
Yes these are the cars flying over New Jersey and other areas of America and now overseas. They’ve just been released 2024.
This is basically an human sized drone with cool ambient lights 😂
yeaa, a very very very dangerous drone! OMG, did they not imagine that those propellers can turn human body into TOMATO SAUCE???
Yeah. Calling this a car is confusing at the best. What is the one significant thing about cars ... hmmm ... Wheels, maybe?
@@tadeasmarek1186 ikr 😅
Basically where they got the idea from.
On the video it is daid that it was a prototype and there are new models coming soon with wheels, so there's that. But yeah this prototype looks a lot like a drone
It's been anticipated on for 100 years, nice to finally see something tangible in my lifetime, it's still a work in progress as he said, but it's a start non the less. I think it's cool.
I honestly think we will have flying cars and air lanes (and licenses needed for it) within next 10/20 years
Hopefully within 10 years il be 49 then. I or atleast within our lifetime. Something like fith element
O it looks like the car on blade runner 2049
@@jayjunior2023 only the top of the top are gonna own these things…they’re not letting regular pedestrians purchase and fly these like cars that’s not happening for a longggg time
Just thinking of something with such high tech safety features still producing a scary reaction to actually being up in the air and I have renewed respect for pilots throughout the 20th century.
Safety features? LOL It literally has an off switch you can turn it off in the air and fall to your death 3:40
High tech safety features? That thing looks like a death machine lol
How appropriate that your avatar is Ben Grimm, a test pilot.
Just to be clear the green navigation lights are on the right because green navigation lights lights are always on the right. When you are looking forwards from inside the craft. Red is always on the left looking forwards from inside the cockpit. It’s easy to remember when you know the true history.
Port and starboard come from the nautical history of shipping. In the early days of ships the rudder wasn’t located at the back enter as all ships are today. It was a large steer board located on the right hand side of the large boat. Such as a vicking ship. Because the steer board was located on the right hand side it could not dock on the steer board side as the steer board would get bashed against the dock.
This is why the left hand side of a ship is called port the ships would only tie up against the dock on the port side to protect the steer board side. Now known as starboard.
The drink of port is red which is why port is red and starboard is green. As you look forwards from within the craft.
The presenter got his port and starboard mixed up. Green is never on the left as the presenter stated. He stated this because he was looking back at the craft and said Green was on the lift. He should have said it’s on the right but maybe saying it while looking forwards. 😂
I would like to second owensmith's comments above. Mariners need to know the "rules of the road" for safe navigation. Red is located on the left, Green on the right as you drive the vehicle. These rules - it would appear - will be used for these flying vehicles. It is critical that these rules be understood and followed by the pilots of these flying cars. Thank you owensmith for highlighting this most critical aspect of safety.
Every time I get stuck in traffic I think about flying car. 😊
Paul Moller & Moller Skycar m400
@@torrinashcraft5677 that thing never even came from the ground
Who’s gonna tell him that air traffic exists
8 billion cars in the sky and everyone dies
@@sew_gal7340 traffic can be layered in the sky
Looks incredible but the potential for tragedy and collateral damage is way too high for these to ever be a common sight.
Imagine how much less space cars have to maneuver in. The first person to predict people were going to drive on very narrow lanes over 60mph for sometimes 4 hours straight would have been labelled as a madman.
Thats true tho and they must add control stick to move around instead of self flying mode
@@lordspectra7244 Yeah but ppl cant even drive without killing themselves. The risk and consequence is too much to be a everyday viable transport
@@lordspectra7244 Bruh ppl cant even drive straight on painted lines and flat roads. Good luck with flying control sticks
That's what people thought about cars going over 70mph legally also at one point. Too dangerous. But tech advances over time. We won't be grounded forever....
IT'S ABOUT FREAKING TIME!!!!!!! I have been waiting since the 80's for a flying car!!!
Now it’s hovering over The states and are being seen by people during the night.😮
looks totally safe with the exposed propellers. I can't imagine anything going wrong at all. nope, no way.
a few decapitations & they will be grounded like Concorde
Does it have a parachute?
I wouldn’t get in it without that
It comes with a raft you have to jump out like Indiana Jones.
Ich bin mit dir ganz einverstanden
@@mathew3267 lol
@@mathew3267 Lmao 😂
Parachutes cannot open fully at low operating height
it looks like a big drone. In addition, the propellers will shred a person standing near
Don't stand next to it when its taking off 🤷 kinda like don't cross the street without looking both ways.
@@kien109 imagine getting chased by one of them
I was at a party ( in the 90's)next door to Opalocka airport in Miami and arrived 15 minutes after this poor guy had parked his bike and had walked too close to a cessna propellor; ripped his arm clean off...I heard he was suicidal for awhile... when they start mass- producing these, they need to put fan guards on these things.
They need to cover the blades
I am pretty sure they will have all sorts of sensors on them, when they detect someone is coming close, they should instantly stop. Just like modern sawblades, they automatically and instantly stop if your finger gets too close by accident.
This needs to be sold ASAP!
You can fly over the traffic jams and finally arrive to work on time
不，每个国家的法律不会通过的，相关的法律没有得到完善之前是不能大量生产的。
@@JerryGone-Fishin what happen when everyone have one of these?, air traffic?
@@airsoftjisus4730don’t forget robots and shit
wow those drones are so big that you can ride them 😱
I can honestly say that one out of 50 flights something will go wrong. This seems super dangerous.
i’m pretty sure regulators will have to produce set of standards based on accident rates and they’ll probably create some testing and rules you have to follow to get overall air accidents within acceptable range or safety levels. for example, like modern road car automatic safety braking if you get too close to another car but on steroids.
This isn't for public use. Yikes the ignorance
For planes and boats, Red is for Port. From within the vessel or aircraft and looking forward, the Port side is always the left side.
There’s no Port left and red is not Right, puns intended.
My sailing coach used something similar! :)
It's probably a newer model but this looks exactly like two of the drones they've shown clear as day up close.
Or maybe they showed you a clip of this drone and said it was new jersey
Been waiting for this for many many years. Now when they add the tires it'll really be a car
Exactly.😂
You'll need a pilot's license for this and that's an expensive endevour.
Why would you need a pilot license your not flying it your just sitting there
Грузу лицензия пилота ненужна
Actually, there are some small helicopters, that you don't need a license to pilot.
@@matthewk7507 maybe in the US, the rest of the world has more sensible laws around manned flight.
Yup
It's good..I'm in jersey 20 min from new York...I will avoid the crazy traffic jams...🔥🔥🔥🔥
But what happens when you have traffic jams in the aaaiiir and you're running out of juice? ...everybody has to land? Well, back to the drawing board.
And where would you park
Are there any safety features to prevent accidents? If the propellers stop working, does it have parachutes that are effective to avoid crashes? Any backup failures or redundancy? Location tracker? Etc?
I hope there will be safety features on it
@@PraveenSrJ01there are the only danger is the propellers they would cup you in half lol
35 minutes flight for a 3 hours charge yea really worth it
When it saves you an hour in traffic, you’ll think it’s more efficient for your lifestyle, unless you enjoy sitting on the highway in stop and go traffic. Maybe you do prefer that to just a 20 minute flight straight from work to home at the end of the day.
@Nabor Simbor lol folks can’t even drive on the ground… imagine these things falling out of the sky on your house cuz someone got air rage lol.
Changing lanes and merging blind spots like nuclear waste, solutions will be in place when the time comes.
@Nabor Simbor traffic in the air is three dimensionally not just a linear highway like on the ground.
They can have docking stations in many places where the pilot can land, and have an assistant quickly swap his flat battery for a pre-charged one. The assistant will take flat battery and charge it for pilot on return journey. Additionally, he could park flying car on roof of a high rise parking lot and charge on electric pod.
We are in the infancy of EV tech. 5-10 years from now will be incredible! ⚡🇺🇲
We are in the end stage of electric vehicle development. It's about as useful as it was in 1900 when it was first being developed. In other words, the fad will be gone soon enough.
Right. Lol. Not a chance, what the heck are you thinking? Lol.
@@TehButterflyEffect when they (EV Delivery trucks) were competing against the cost of horse draft. Those old news paper ads are hilarious!
“The Baker Motor-Vehicle company”. G-search it, in regards to EV.
30 perct. Tpo 65 Percy.
Very interesting! Bird, during each move of wings, moves center of mass lower, when wings are higher, thus self-balancing of changed degrees of position naturally comes and bird goes straight without dangerous changes of direction of flight to left, right, front and back sides and between.
Thus it would be nice to make something similar. Another thing you can do is to change, smash, dissolve redirecting, deviations of vectors by some rotation. You know this funny thing rotating on table, you can touch with self-balancing. Birds can't do this trick and it is a bit more complex task. It is connected to dynamic contours. Btw, this toy on table could be much more efficient if two contours were moved in opposite direction with same speed. As it balances axis rotation changes. Actually you need to understand that sides of toy that received deviation go to opposite side self-balancing it by same force. In dynamics without interruption of toy points, particles, parts. So, if you touch toy, side receiving inertia to upper direction goes to lower position lifting it higher, while part that received intertia to bottom direction goes to opposite side upper. With direction to bottom. It goes with all particles with different vectors qnd inertia and smooth change of it. 😏
I'd love to see air shuttles running around fully autonomous.
And listen to the noise they make? Think again
You said it... "Love to watch". Don't know about getting in one tho. At least not at first, let others try it first, and second, and third, and so on. Maybe after many try it, maybe and that's a serious MAYBE, I'll eventually try it. I don't feel comfortable riding in a shuttle on land without a driver, to get one in the sky, you're gonna have to knock me out like Mr. T on the A-Team. "I pitty the fool", that tries to get me in one of those.
Definitely don't want to see large swarms of these in the future. God that'd be a menace
@@LaFragas more noisy than cars and highways? Get real
I can't imagine driving something without manual controls. If something goes wrong, what are you suppose to do?
Supercar Blondie Awesome Video I think the All new Xpeng X2 is Absolutely Incredible and I can't wait to see more More on TH-cam
Nah bro it ain't
I say it is beautifully designed- loved the quality of materials used- My question is this- can it handle sudden cross winds ?
It's just a glorified concept. People make stupid things while driving a car on an empty road. Imagine giving a flying machine to everyone. No way. No more energy? You fall like brick, potentially killing other people. And what about those nice rotating blades, completely exposed with zero protection. It's a death trap.
It's more likely that the cross winds would handle you.
Looking quickly without analyzing it any longer, I realize that the propellers must be protected like a fan because any object, or bird, can break them. The doors should not open upwards because an opening in the air could either create resistance with the opposing air mass, or they could break (even one of them) and cause a major imbalance and accident. Opening the doors prevents rapid ejection or even aborting for parachute use. The idea is good in terms of vertical take-off and futuristic related to vertical displacement. But it requires great development in ideas. I would prefer to create something different, with force transfer in the event of a collision and I would not use propellers but rather a means using what gases already do without any man manipulating them. We have everything there in nature and certain animals like birds put on a show for us and we complicate things by not using the obvious. Of course, we don't need to fly little or slowly like birds, but we have the cognition to understand how gases work, just as we create instant messages through the internet, we can use the molecules of the atmosphere as a road, just by studying a lot about them. I practiced paragliding and after many years I began to see that I was a prisoner of the thermals and this started to bother me because in the time I was flying, I was only carried by a paraglider made with about 80 cells that trapped the air and They took vertical and rotating flight in thermals and then I started to descend and descend until I landed. So there is something natural, as natural as the molecules on the ground, whose atoms are at high speed and we do not notice it, and whose planet Earth and the entire universe is subject to forces that, if studied well beyond what Einstein proposed, we will easily reach any place in the universe. Remembering that centuries ago the internet, instant dialogue, was just fiction. So what I think now may just be current fiction. But it all depends on study, a lot of study.
I can’t even afford a car with four wheels…
Me too 🤣😂
No this car is designed for i your real estate rental Land Lord to rule over you with while you pay his mortgages. Not for the unlanded peasants
@@robertchiarizia9463 didn't one of the UK MPs describe us as plebs
@@jackwatsonepic626 we are plebs
你需要一次拆迁致富
I love it!! 35 minutes of flight isn't bad compared to others.
But, imagine having to take the test to be able to drive this.
@@Andrew-zj8ybit flys its self no test needed
Ich bin recht sicher in 3 bis 4 Jahren sind Akkus verfügbar die gut für 1 bis 2 Stunden fliegen sind !!! Leider bin ich zu alt um es zu kaufen !!! In der BRD wird dann sowieso irgend eine Vorschrift, fliegen nur ganz wenigen möglich sein,!!!!!
It looks like a really cool helicopter am sure people will love it
What are you stupid. I’m not being smart I know you’re not stupid but think about it. Would you want to be walking out of a bar and somebody’s drunk and takes off. And there goes your head. Rolling down the ground down the road. And then he killed a couple other people on the way. And then goes home and his kids run out mommy daddy pop snap crackle there goes their heads rolling down the lawn. No thank you. This is a big mistake they don’t even have guards around the blades
@@hermanatorherrman9164 But its still a prototype am sure they will take care of those issues
Sounds exactly like a helicopter too. No practical use. We already have a helicopter for that. Unless they invented some sort of mchine that uses levitation. Not practicable as we already have helicopter
Are you testing these over NJ by any chance
Thank you for your enthusiasm... yes, it is extremely appealing and must be intimidating at first try! I would gladly buy one for sure if I can afford it.I would prefer from far some anti-gravity vehicles when they will be made, it should be safer. It is a good start anyway, what a nice job here. May the Force be with you!
@Chris Knight but,what happens when ur car malfunctions, like engine dies or run out fuel or whatever? You'd just fall straight down to ur death.imagine the risk hitting people on the ground
@@paulsmith9192 yep. How crappy people maintain their cars now? When pilots currently go up in a small plane, there is an elaborate checklist. I'm sure the people who always run late and zig zag through traffic now, will realize the error in their ways, and get up an hour earlier so they can incorporate a "pre-flight Checklist" into their daily routine....
@vix altaris monumentum monstrantum um, there is no wing. You would have to have a very large glider wing, much bigger than a normal glider, plus the flying car simply is not designed anything like a plane , with a slightly nose heavy axis, a tail, ailerons, etc. It just doesn't work that way at all. It will tumble out of control, more or less straight down.
Don't be flying over my street making that much noise.
Those vehicle are only safer as long as they don't leave your garage.
Knowing my luck, I’d probably step out of my car while the propellers are still spinning and get chopped to pieces by my own car! 😱
exactly what i thought 😮
Then at least there would be some fresh leftovers for the vultures to feast on.
That's if you don't mince a few people on the ground first
😆🤣
@@jaycitowilli6428 It's Ok, didn't really expect any more than that... You've got nothing at all, have you?
A flying car without wheels, amazing.
Then is it a car? 🧐 because I was thinking how is this a car? Looks like a drone and who’s going to be the test dummy?
Kinda like a plane without a wings
Basically, it's a just a chopper with wheels.
"Flying cars" is just a fancy name for helicopters.
Haha, I was looking for this comment lol 😂
@@maxellray: Some companies are working on genuine dual-purpose flying cars that can go on roads and take to the air - there are videos about them . . .
These have been flying around in NJ and NY.
And Oregon makes sense now
I remember back when Alex used to do her own video :(
It looks like a giant drone 😁 WOW
This is future step baby
coz it is lol
Because it is!
Yes
Paul Moller & Moller Skycar m400 G-search it
The word's first flying car was already invented and patented in 1939 on September 14th. It's called a helicopter.
they have no idea what a flying car is..this is just a giant drone "quadcopter"
How is a helicopter a car? There's literally no wheels so it can't by definition be a flying car.
@axeljohnson2184 all helicopters have detachable ground wheels on them. They are also two to four door seaters. Yes they are.
@@Snairster Let me rephrase. Can you drive in a helicopter? No you cannot, so calling it a flying car is just desingenuous.
@axeljohnson2184 I actually do fly helicopters, and I can say from experience it's literally the same feeling as driving a car when you're high up. Hovering, landing and taking off is obviously different, but you can actually take off a helicopter similar to a plane if you want. They 100% feel like cars in the sky, and they are.
This prototype is literally a huge drone. The safety aspects raise my concerns.
1. Not seeing any crash landing features.
2. No controller for maneuver flying
3. The G impact supported by the structure and seat.
It's actually literally not a drone
Looks like an accident waiting to happen with those rotor blades exposed like that 🤣
One bird and you are done.
@@dski8097 Or child walking into it
Cars driving is also an accident waiting to happen. Cars are way more dangerous as they actually often are close to pedestrians. This thing is up in the sky 99% of the time.
@@JRS-j9m Yikes
@@georgia2727 and planes only crash . 001% of the time.
If I had the money I would 100% buy the production version of this. Sick…
Me too. Looks awesome.
Не мугу избавиться от мысли как этот аппарат нашинковывает людей своими открытыми лопастями
Это сколько шума будет в городе ! Теперь при аварии эти штуковины будут падать на головы людей ! Первыми этой штуковиной воспользуются террористы , напичкают взрывчаткой и прилетят в толпу людей !
From both a safety and mechanical engineering point of view, providing shrouds around the 'propellers' would mitigate the potential for injury to pedestrians, whilst providing more downward thrust, since the air would now be more concentrated by the enclosure. A bit like a jet engine but with the mechanism providing the thrust, oriented vertically, rather than horizontally, as per a jet.
Ma penso che questo prototipo possa volare solo su zone private. Ma basterebbe mettere una carrozzeria che inglobi le eliche per risolvere il problema...
Glimpse of the future. Hope a common man will afford to atleast rent one for a day!
именно так. сколько я себя помню всегда было обязательное требование (в СССР) чтобы винты были защищены защитным кольцом. но видимо времена меняются.
Red and green lights. This is what people are seeing over NJ
1980:In the future we'll have flying cars!
2022:they weren't wrong
Edit: I didn't mean to start a fight lol
This ain't no car, jack!
1951: whoa flying cars are invented!! Theyre called helicopter!!!
@@mrnorthz9373 well actually this would be a quadcopter...
@@phyl1283 if they use jets instead this will be real sci-fi flying cars finally.
Hopefully the designers & engineers can work with the people making those jetpack suits in Dubai.
They just had the first jetpack race in history a few days ago.
@@John-X i know. Helicopters were a thing in 1951.
I have a question for anyone who has knowledge about it...
Why dont we use fuel for such huge drones? Wouldnt that be a better option that can let the "flying car" fly for an extended period of time?
Weight and space for fuel. Also fuel burns. So engines needs more maintaince and will produce more heat and carbon emmissions. Not efficient for mass usage
Edit: can work on better batteries
a jet engine has to be service every month since any failure mean death, it not cheap to own a helicopter for this reason. the advance of electric motors is they are decentralised (no single engine driving all the blade), even if 2 motor fails, the craft can still fly and land safely.
@@hungrybearcircus8427
But the weight of the batteries which are needed for a flight are much more heavier than the weight we need for fuel, otherwise we would have had planes working on electricity.
@@lagrangewei You have got a point there, maybe maintenance cost plays a huge role in that.
@@hungrybearcircus8427 that doesn't explain airplanes though. You can't even control where this little thing is going like a helicopter for example! The car is already carbon fiber, so how is that a reason why it can't be gas...
Would you need a pilot license for this thing? Also I'm nervous at times driving on land let alone flying. The risk seems astronomical (no pun intended)
Do you need a license to get on a bus? a plane? a train? Your not flying it, Its doing it for you.. haha
@@NRIautos But there's only two seats. What if you want to take your partner for a ride or take your kids to school?
I think a pilot license should be needed because otherwise there would be huge amounts of accidents
We got flying cars before GTA 6
Underrated
We have flying cars for about a century now
2025 is coming!
The future of mobility on cities looks promising.
I believe a number of SciFi stories had expected us to have flying cars by now. But this prototype does just seem like someone enlarged a typical personal drone, but added carbon fiber, racing seats, and some Tesla tech to make it human ridable. If my drone had carbon fiber blades they'd last longer. I get the feeling that the propeller blades are rather dangerous and could pose a threat to keeping one's head. At the end of the day, this is just so darn cool. I can't wait to see what they do to make it a real flying car. I am expecting that when you are stuck in traffic on the ground, you push some toggle switches, and you do a vertical take-off and fly off to your meeting at Spacely's Space Sprockets. Hmmm, but with the advances in AI technology will we really need to go to work to push buttons like George Jetson was expected to do? Important issues to ponder.
Movies flying car is just not plausible, the most energy efficient method to hover an object will always be helicopter/drone based.
Im pretty sure if they want to make a movielike jet-powered car, they can already do that, but the amount of pollution and energy consumption just to hover the object would be through the roof.
@@VienPeaaace The even more energy efficient way to transport large amounts of people is public transit.
Before I continue I’d like to ask, what if you exceed 35 mins on air, is there a back up battery to ensure safe landing?
For this to be considered a "flying car" it needs to have wheels it's more of a mini-helicopter.
It should have been labelled as a component towards the progression of flying cars not the actual flying car.
I absolutely will buy it. Is like everything, we just need to get use to it
The decapitator machine is finally here! It's also a flying car btw.
Not really a flying car, more like a personal helicopter.
Looks more like an advance helicopter than a flying car. The blades on the sides is extremely unsafe, but I know there will be a work around on this. This is going to be a pretty good vehicle when it's done.
I can't wait until this comes out.
Why?
@@TheRxCrypto because this is going to be the next generation of automobile.
@@edwards.8801 uhhh...could take some time in my opinion. I'm 35. When I was a kid in the 90s flying cars were "right around the corner." I'm thinking mass adoption is around the year 2099, but that's just me... maybe sooner, maybe only the very wealthy, only time will tell.
@@TheRxCrypto ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@Brandon Zachary 2024🤣
Can't wait to see the owners that will own one & paint it with amazing designs 😍 🙌 ✨️
The paint already Looks amazing 👏🏽 🤩 but I'm sure it won't take long for owners to Send Them For a Paint Job. ❤
If there are hundreds of them fying on the same way, imagine how louder is that 😂
What about air traffic control? you can only fly this in unrestricted airspace and you still have to obey faa regulations
Can't wait for all the constant noise.
They're goin to build houses that block outside noises
@@Hozay_89 yeah right and everyone is going to get one. No matter where you live or how much money you have, free soundproof house.
This is actually very exciting! But there are soooo many things about it that need to be redesigned especially that flying time, it being so loud, and the propellers need an enclosed design for safety, their exposure could kill someone if they get too close. Congratulations China! 👏👏👏👏👏!
It cannot be called a car until it can run over the road
Which part of stupid are you from?
First off its just a private helicopter but 2nd that's what's flying over new jersey rn
I think we will be seeing a lot of cars like these flying in the skies by 2050 😅
Nope. Not like these
Will be seeing - but not hearing.
We will have earplugs all day :/
I won't. I was born in 1940.
@@phyl1283Bro you killed death
Wow nice drone 🤩
Drone? Yeah drone 😂
@@JR_hSN yeah, it's big drone right 😂
NAV has to develop a lot to really get flying cars to work, but once NAV is up to speed, this is the future, for sure. You can’t have people flying these without a ton of assistance, obviously.
Are these the things flying over New Jersey
No manual override?
what's the point of manual overide unless the passenger actually has a Helicopter Pilor Liscense?
Well, that will take range anxiety too a whole new level!!!!! Lol
Now they need to create designated landing spots for these flying cars.
The concern regarding propellers as a potential safety issue is indeed valid and warrants careful consideration. In the design and operation of air shuttles, the safety of both passengers and bystanders is paramount. Innovations in air shuttle technology often include measures such as enclosing the propellers to minimize the risk of accidents, as well as implementing rigorous safety protocols and emergency systems designed to protect against propeller-related hazards. Moreover, ongoing research and development are continuously enhancing the safety features of these vehicles, ensuring that the propellers, while essential for flight, do not compromise the overall safety and reliability of air shuttle services.
I love the noise pollution already!
atleast it's not emitting harmful chemicals.
It's uh..... Anti-bird collision technology, yeah... That's what we'll call it.
It's the end of 2024 and no flying cars in the sky
I came here to say exactly this, lol.
Do you have to use both hands for different functions and both feet for different directions, like a helicopter? I would.❤
It appears that it will be computer controlled. One will just put in a destination and the computer will do the rest.
Paul Moller & Moller Skycar m400 G-search it
@@torrinashcraft5677 The Mollar Skycar has been in development for 40 years and has never achieved free flight or gone into production. The developer of the Skycar is now accused of deliberate fraud. - Wikipedia