Abu Bakr (RA) even allocated monthly income to them so what this Shai brother is talking about. Wives of the prophet are our mothers, do you think it's fair to leave them alone in the street after the demise of Prophet MUHAMMAD (SAW). It makes no sense at all.
Wives of RasulAllah s.a.w are Ahle bait and all Muslims (sunni Sahabas) used to stipend Ahle bait as we are asked by RasulAllah s.a.w to take care of Ahle bait
Feel sorry for yourself you don't know how to use cap locks. The obvious truth sahaba fought wars killed each other. Who on earth in their right minds pretends they were best friends! That is obvious truth you are blind to. You are Adnan fanboy you don't even see his dishonesty
@@MrGigglesGalore 24:39 Adnan fails miserably again claims we don't have many Hadith from Imam Ali! Sunni have more. Here he caught out blatantly lying. Does he not know we have books on Imam Ali sermons alone! Nahjul balagha! Sunni don't have anything in comparison.
@@MrGigglesGalore 24:06 Here Adnan realises his hypocrisy & deceitful argument is caught out. When he forced to back track & agree saying"of course, of course, of course!" He suddenly starts saying "of course" because his deceitful argument shia could not exist until our Hadith collection existed is like him claiming Sunni couldn't exist before Bukhari, Muslim etc. Hypocrisy at it finest
@@yousufsadat9243 aqal yes, but aqal fails people whose intentions are corrupt. In my humble opinion, sincerity of intentions & effort is more important in attaining hidaya from Allah!
@@sheikhfahad2436 I agree with you but in some cases, people don’t even put an effort to use their Aqal lol. I mean look at the nature of comments they make against mother of believers Aisha (RA) knowing the fact that Allah SWT showed her to our beloved Prophet (SAW) in his dream. How can Allah choose such a woman to his prophet and this scenario is different than Prophet Noah and Lut
It’s quiet funny when they mentioned the war in Yemen, this Saudi Shia individual who’s studying and living in the UK through a Saudi financed scholarship, When the war was mentioned he said it’s the Saudi government 😂😂😂
They accept that but then there is a claim that Jaafar As Sadiq saying Abu Zurarah is the most truthful one, and so guess which one they will believe, I remember reading somewhere that they actually believe that Jaffar As Sadiq curse Abu Zurarah in the morning while at night he travel to kuffah (with a miracle) and tell him these Hadiths.
A very nice and decent debate between both. The shia brother seems to be very well read. I just pray he realises the fallacies of the shia ways and comes to the truth
shia is like a patient and brother adnan is like a psychiatrist. whatever he brings up, brother adnan will say no . no its like this. and yes its like that
Clear you are a blind fanboy. 24:16 Adnan false claims against shia Hadith get corrected. He is correcting Adnan false claims which you clearly don't understand.
Some say that his real name was 'Abdu Rabbihi (Arabic: عبد ربه), and Zurarah was a nickname. He was also known as Abu al-Hasan (lit. "the father of Hasan"). Some reports say that his father was a Byzantine monk who was captured and sold into slavery in a Muslim territory to someone from the Shaybani clan, which Zurarah remained affixed to.
Many Allah (swt) bless this Shia brother he was so polite he let so many of Adnan blatant lies go. It is clear most comments here are biased & clueless. If their side shouts the loudest & argues constantly they see that bad akhlaq as a victory. Number of times Adnan made false accusations that if Imams did what Ammar Ibn Yasir did they were accused of being hypocrites. Double standards in his arguments. He couldn't get simple point of the shia being persecuted in his head. Even now just read sectarian comments
sorry Adnan. There is a difference between the infidel Khomeini who was appointed by the French government to issue the Khomeini revolution against the Sunnis, and the Mufti of Saudi Arabia who follows the path of the Prophet and alsahabuh wa Ataabiein
24:06 Here Adnan realises his hypocrisy & deceitful argument is caught out. When he forced to back track & agree saying"of course, of course, of course!" He suddenly starts saying "of course" because his deceitful argument shia could not exist until our Hadith collection existed is like him claiming Sunni couldn't exist before Bukhari, Muslim etc. Hypocrisy at it finest
24:21 it final clicks in his hypocrisy. He about say Bukhari is when his hadiths were collected but realises that was way after Imam Sadiq. So he starts changing his argument from time of collection to who narrated. In his deceit he doesn't acknowledge all Shia Hadith go back to Prophet through Imams fathers because they were his descendents. But the Shia debate very polite so sticks to Adnan premise. but Adnan fails miserably again claims we don't have many Hadith from Imam Ali! Sunni have more. Here he caught out blatantly lying. Does he not know we have books on Imam Ali sermons alone! Nahjul balagha!
@@Shia.Ahlulbayt nahajul balagaj is a book written 400 years after ali r.a, and it is his saying. Not hadiths. And there are 400+ hadiths from.hazrat ali r.a and 200+ from omar r.a, abu bakr r.a amd uthman r.a combine. And what hypocrisy? 🤣 Bro isn't the Quran greatest destroyer of shiasm yazeedi cult? 🤣
@@saadsalman4518 You don't understand nothing just insults like a child. Nahjul balagha was compiled way before Bukhari & Muslim. If you actually understood the debate or shi'i view your know it refutes Adnan lies about what we had from Imam Ali. We have more hadiths from him fact. He was told that but the liar ignored like he did throughout the debate when he was corrected
If you have a weak or ignorant lawyer / Advocate, then you can still lose the case in court even though you are are on truth. In most of these debate videos, the people from Shia side who indulge in such debates with these experienced Salafis are usually ignorant or dont have knowledge and they start debating with salafis. Sometimes they get confused due to lack of knowledge and reason and salafis overwhelm them due to their lack of knowledge of their deen and Sunna's deen. THey should not indulge in such debates untill they are fully equipped with knowledge from both sides, as it makes Shia case weaker in front of general audience / masses. Only expereinced Shia debaters should take part.
@@afrabinte2458 The Shia researcher whose main expertise is in comparative studies / History and has been debating with different sects since long time. It does not necessarily be a Marja or Ayatollah. The person whose memory is strong and who knows both shia and Sunni history / Hadith / aqaid properly. Not someone who himself is confused or does not have deep knowledge of both .
@@afrabinte2458 I know already but the debaters from Shia side are not as much experienced here at Speakers corner as the Salafi preachers. For example Salafi brother Shamsi has been debating and preaching since more than 15 years, adnan has been in the field for last 22 years or so. The Shia debaters are mostly just common laymen who have little bit of knowledge and are not well versed in the debating field. I am from Pakistan and i have seen Shia winning the debates here in Pakistan and whole villages converting to Shia as a result but those Shia debaters are mostly ex-Sunni or ex-Salafi.
Do you have narrations from Abu bakr or Umar or Yazid or Mawiya lol you forgot that Ibn Abbas said they Angered the Prophet during his illness the Thursday. And also told Imam Ali before his death to ask the Prophet for Successorship before Ghadir so o can now say that makes him Shia lol 😆
37:45 Adnan dishonesty like usually. When do Shia ever bring our own hadiths to prove a point to him? Never because we know he won't accept. Just his cheap shot to attack some of the closest companions of Imam Sadiq.
Rafidhis have always harmed Islam. Their main target is Islam. They only use Sahaba as a means to target Islam and break it's foundations. But Allah will break the back of every enemy of this deen
Shias have not taken any land that was promised to muslims lo he said the Mughals were Shia . Pakistan was founded by a Shia Syira was leaded by a Shia Iran was founded by a Shia
23:00 More dishonesty from Adnan cheap trick. He claim shi'ism didn't exist until Hadith narrated from Imam Sadiq. If he making this argument, then Sunni most authentic Hadith collections Bukhari, Muslim etc did come until way after Imam Sadiq. It is worse for him. His own argument show his hypocrisy as it backfires on him more. There is a huge difference between arguing about doctrine development & when fundamental belief existed. This happened with all schools of thought. They came after the Prophet! He neglects to say Imam Sadiq narrated from his father & his father etc back to the Prophet. The fundamentals of Shia belief existed in the time of the Prophet. All fiqh that came after doesn't change that. If tried his salaf argument no it is same situation their fiqh didn't come until later
Christians claims to fallow Jesus and take their religion from pull. Shia cliams to fallow آل البيت and then fallow zuraeah and hesham and hesham . Shia and Christianity are identical twins.
24:16 Adnan dishonesty again telling Shia their belief accord to his twisted view. Then his false claims being corrected. We have Hadith refering even to the Prophet time of the Shia of Ali & Prophet successors which he conveniently ignores like they don't exist. When knows they do.
1:06:15 . That's a mistake from bro Adnan. Saudi Arabia is defending the Dawa of twheed and fighting against Bida. they don't allow Bida and they spirit Dawa twheed in all country. and they defined yemen and the kaba from hoothy. all that is nothing .....
Destroying Afghanistan!!? How did we do that!!!? By the founder you mean Muhammad Jinnah!? His background majority Nizari Shia while he went to Sunni Islam and his relatives said that.
24:39 Adnan fails miserably again claims we don't have many Hadith from Imam Ali! Sunni have more. Here he caught out blatantly lying. Does he not know we have books on Imam Ali sermons alone! Nahjul balagha! Sunni don't have anything in comparison.
Lol you don't have chain of narration for nahjul balaga, somebody 400 years after Ali RA passed got up and said Ali said this. Shiaism has no legs. Lies lies and lies
@@al.mughira Are you a child? Do think mocking & ridiculing is islamic? Do have any real knowledge on islam? Clearly not there a scholar who gone through nahjah balagh cross referenced with hadith which agree with chains. Seriously when come like a child mocking & ridiculing saying like a child you won have some real knowledge. Don't be a jahil fanboy of liar like Adnan it just shows how even more jahil you are
@@al.mughira remind me you hypocrite when was Bukhari, Muslim etc written. Which caliph forbid the writing of Hadith? Oh yeah the ones you follow. After read those collected. Guess he didn't like the truth. Irony at time when hadiths would have been at their most authentic straight after the prophet it is your faith that denied it. You hypocrite want to attack when nahjul balagha was compiled
@@DarkDawn According to Muslims Christian teachings have been corrupted so obviously Hitler was not following the right teachings, however the above mentioned Nutjobs all follow abubakr, umer and uthman to the letter. Also Hitler wars were not motivated by religion. when Isis is slitting thoats of people and raping women they say sahaba did it.
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.83[2/2] ประสบการณ์ขนหัวลุกจากตำนานวงการผี!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/T_kFecQw7Ds/mqdefault.jpg)
A smart Shia brother it seems like he wants to Be genuine and know the truth , may Allah guide him to the truth , ameen
Ma sha Allah. May Allah SWT accept from brother Adnan his efforts, and to increase him in knowledge and eloquence.
This is the purest way of debate and really picturing the events. With an open mind and a humble approach. Loved all 4 vids ❤️
Masha Allah Adnan is a bahr of knowledge. He would have made a great scholar if he wanted to pursue it.
Abu Bakr (RA) even allocated monthly income to them so what this Shai brother is talking about. Wives of the prophet are our mothers, do you think it's fair to leave them alone in the street after the demise of Prophet MUHAMMAD (SAW). It makes no sense at all.
Wives of RasulAllah s.a.w are Ahle bait and all Muslims (sunni Sahabas) used to stipend Ahle bait as we are asked by RasulAllah s.a.w to take care of Ahle bait
Adnan the Lion of islam, the defender of the honor of the Prophet AS.! May Allah give you more knowledge and wisdom.
No.....He is more defender of children of hinda
@@PkTrek LOL! Never red the Koran, right?
I REALLY FEEL SORRY FOR THIS SHIA BROTHER, VERY SMART, VERY EDUCATED...YET HE IS DENYING THE OBVIOUS TRUTH....MAY ALLAH GUIDE HIM.
Feel sorry for yourself you don't know how to use cap locks. The obvious truth sahaba fought wars killed each other. Who on earth in their right minds pretends they were best friends! That is obvious truth you are blind to.
You are Adnan fanboy you don't even see his dishonesty
May Allah open their hearts and eyes Ameen suma Ameen
@@MrGigglesGalore clearly didn't open yours
@@MrGigglesGalore 24:39 Adnan fails miserably again claims we don't have many Hadith from Imam Ali! Sunni have more. Here he caught out blatantly lying. Does he not know we have books on Imam Ali sermons alone! Nahjul balagha! Sunni don't have anything in comparison.
@@MrGigglesGalore 24:06 Here Adnan realises his hypocrisy & deceitful argument is caught out. When he forced to back track & agree saying"of course, of course, of course!"
He suddenly starts saying "of course" because his deceitful argument shia could not exist until our Hadith collection existed is like him claiming Sunni couldn't exist before Bukhari, Muslim etc.
Hypocrisy at it finest
What's stopping them from following the straight path despite all the evidences going against them.
Thier ignorance
It's not what, it is who! اللہ تعالٰی
@@sheikhfahad2436 That’s obvious, however Allah SWT has given us Aqal to use
@@yousufsadat9243 aqal yes, but aqal fails people whose intentions are corrupt. In my humble opinion, sincerity of intentions & effort is more important in attaining hidaya from Allah!
@@sheikhfahad2436 I agree with you but in some cases, people don’t even put an effort to use their Aqal lol. I mean look at the nature of comments they make against mother of believers Aisha (RA) knowing the fact that Allah SWT showed her to our beloved Prophet (SAW) in his dream. How can Allah choose such a woman to his prophet and this scenario is different than Prophet Noah and Lut
Jazak Allah Brother
nice convo....well mannered..... really enjoyed it
Well mannered? Adnan is a street thug
@@wissamassaad1865 facts hurt....
ya Ali CANNOT madad
Do not mock they are misguided yes but the are still the closest to us as brothers pray for them
@@zayedharoon3910 they r the worse to us
@@zayedharoon3910 they r the worst enemies Rafidhis
@@zayedharoon3910 I don't see a difference between Rafidah and jews of Israel or hindutva in India
Shia Mushrikeen
The Shia guy breath : Adnan wait wait this is good today you will be sunni 😂😂 .. Allah bless you Adnan ❤
Real Problem is Imamat shia consider Imamat equal to Nabuat and they believe imam received wahi even.
Shiaism is not islam
جزاك الله خير شيخ عدنان وبارك فيك وبذريتك
والله الاخ الشيعي للحق
It’s quiet funny when they mentioned the war in Yemen, this Saudi Shia individual who’s studying and living in the UK through a Saudi financed scholarship, When the war was mentioned he said it’s the Saudi government 😂😂😂
Love these long civilised convos,
No insulting, no yelling, just content
Barak ALLAHu Feek
its weird..if Imam Jaafar As Sadiq said on public Abu Zurarah is a liar etc..why Shia accept hadith from Abu Zurarah?? Shia is a weird religion man..
They accept that but then there is a claim that Jaafar As Sadiq saying Abu Zurarah is the most truthful one, and so guess which one they will believe, I remember reading somewhere that they actually believe that Jaffar As Sadiq curse Abu Zurarah in the morning while at night he travel to kuffah (with a miracle) and tell him these Hadiths.
A very nice and decent debate between both. The shia brother seems to be very well read. I just pray he realises the fallacies of the shia ways and comes to the truth
why can't the shia man accept his own sources with ease.
why why not once does he acknowledge the indifference in the sources?
shia is like a patient and brother adnan is like a psychiatrist. whatever he brings up, brother adnan will say no . no its like this. and yes its like that
Clear you are a blind fanboy. 24:16 Adnan false claims against shia Hadith get corrected. He is correcting Adnan false claims which you clearly don't understand.
Adnan destroy dude left and Right
Some say that his real name was 'Abdu Rabbihi (Arabic: عبد ربه), and Zurarah was a nickname. He was also known as Abu al-Hasan (lit. "the father of Hasan"). Some reports say that his father was a Byzantine monk who was captured and sold into slavery in a Muslim territory to someone from the Shaybani clan, which Zurarah remained affixed to.
Many Allah (swt) bless this Shia brother he was so polite he let so many of Adnan blatant lies go. It is clear most comments here are biased & clueless. If their side shouts the loudest & argues constantly they see that bad akhlaq as a victory.
Number of times Adnan made false accusations that if Imams did what Ammar Ibn Yasir did they were accused of being hypocrites. Double standards in his arguments.
He couldn't get simple point of the shia being persecuted in his head. Even now just read sectarian comments
Brother rashid should get debate with hassan allahyari... it would be interested
Adnan need to go in jail, he masacre him intelectualy.
LOL
sorry Adnan. There is a difference between the infidel Khomeini who was appointed by the French government to issue the Khomeini revolution against the Sunnis, and the Mufti of Saudi Arabia who follows the path of the Prophet and alsahabuh wa Ataabiein
أين أجد الفيديو مترجم؟؟
Assalamu Alaikum...
Whr is part 5???
24:06 Here Adnan realises his hypocrisy & deceitful argument is caught out. When he forced to back track & agree saying"of course, of course, of course!"
He suddenly starts saying "of course" because his deceitful argument shia could not exist until our Hadith collection existed is like him claiming Sunni couldn't exist before Bukhari, Muslim etc.
Hypocrisy at it finest
24:21 it final clicks in his hypocrisy. He about say Bukhari is when his hadiths were collected but realises that was way after Imam Sadiq. So he starts changing his argument from time of collection to who narrated. In his deceit he doesn't acknowledge all Shia Hadith go back to Prophet through Imams fathers because they were his descendents. But the Shia debate very polite so sticks to Adnan premise. but Adnan fails miserably again claims we don't have many Hadith from Imam Ali! Sunni have more. Here he caught out blatantly lying. Does he not know we have books on Imam Ali sermons alone! Nahjul balagha!
@@Shia.Ahlulbayt nahajul balagaj is a book written 400 years after ali r.a, and it is his saying. Not hadiths. And there are 400+ hadiths from.hazrat ali r.a and 200+ from omar r.a, abu bakr r.a amd uthman r.a combine.
And what hypocrisy? 🤣
Bro isn't the Quran greatest destroyer of shiasm yazeedi cult? 🤣
@@Shia.Ahlulbayt amd there are no chain of narrations in nahaj ul balagh.
And bro i can even purge shiasm from nahajul balagh. You wanna debate? 🤣
@@saadsalman4518 You don't understand nothing just insults like a child.
Nahjul balagha was compiled way before Bukhari & Muslim. If you actually understood the debate or shi'i view your know it refutes Adnan lies about what we had from Imam Ali. We have more hadiths from him fact. He was told that but the liar ignored like he did throughout the debate when he was corrected
@@Shia.Ahlulbayt change your name to lantern of Evil or latern of yazeed.
Why is the third guy blocking camera?
If you have a weak or ignorant lawyer / Advocate, then you can still lose the case in court even though you are are on truth. In most of these debate videos, the people from Shia side who indulge in such debates with these experienced Salafis are usually ignorant or dont have knowledge and they start debating with salafis. Sometimes they get confused due to lack of knowledge and reason and salafis overwhelm them due to their lack of knowledge of their deen and Sunna's deen. THey should not indulge in such debates untill they are fully equipped with knowledge from both sides, as it makes Shia case weaker in front of general audience / masses. Only expereinced Shia debaters should take part.
Who are the experienced shia according to you ? Marja? Ayatullah?
@@afrabinte2458 The Shia researcher whose main expertise is in comparative studies / History and has been debating with different sects since long time. It does not necessarily be a Marja or Ayatollah. The person whose memory is strong and who knows both shia and Sunni history / Hadith / aqaid properly. Not someone who himself is confused or does not have deep knowledge of both .
@syed these experienced people r alteady debating. You can search on TH-cam or Google.
@@afrabinte2458 I know already but the debaters from Shia side are not as much experienced here at Speakers corner as the Salafi preachers. For example Salafi brother Shamsi has been debating and preaching since more than 15 years, adnan has been in the field for last 22 years or so. The Shia debaters are mostly just common laymen who have little bit of knowledge and are not well versed in the debating field. I am from Pakistan and i have seen Shia winning the debates here in Pakistan and whole villages converting to Shia as a result but those Shia debaters are mostly ex-Sunni or ex-Salafi.
Allah ordered them to remain in their houses in the Quran (surah ahzab) so Allah s.w.t appointed the houses to them through his amr (command)
Send me the image of coin which Andan Rashid is talking about 52:00 to 54:00
Do you have narrations from Abu bakr or Umar or Yazid or Mawiya lol you forgot that Ibn Abbas said they
Angered the Prophet during his illness the Thursday.
And also told Imam Ali before his death to ask the Prophet for Successorship before Ghadir so o can now say that makes him Shia lol 😆
Abu hurraira 3yr as muslim, Hadith reported 5.5 hadiths per day as if abu hurraira was living with Rasool(s).
Because he spent all his time in the mosque and in the presence of the prophet (saw)
@@adamjin777 Thats a big lie. Even Umer one time beat him up and told him not to make hadiths from himself.
Shia brother says “ where the hell is the verse “ while reading the Quran astagfir Allah no respect for the words of Allah
Part 5?
Which place is this
37:45 Adnan dishonesty like usually. When do Shia ever bring our own hadiths to prove a point to him? Never because we know he won't accept.
Just his cheap shot to attack some of the closest companions of Imam Sadiq.
Rafidhis have always harmed Islam. Their main target is Islam. They only use Sahaba as a means to target Islam and break it's foundations. But Allah will break the back of every enemy of this deen
Shias have not taken any land that was promised to muslims lo he said the Mughals were Shia . Pakistan was founded by a Shia Syira was leaded by a Shia
Iran was founded by a Shia
Wow Mughals were Shias. Which husseiniyat taught you this shi*t?
Are you teling me Abdullah Ibn Abbas is a Sunni hes narrations dont count hes from the Prophet family hes reports support our claim.
Qiblat for Syiah?
the poor guy just mumbled a lot, didn't offer any good points. adnan easily handled yet another shiite in the park.
23:00 More dishonesty from Adnan cheap trick. He claim shi'ism didn't exist until Hadith narrated from Imam Sadiq. If he making this argument, then Sunni most authentic Hadith collections Bukhari, Muslim etc did come until way after Imam Sadiq. It is worse for him. His own argument show his hypocrisy as it backfires on him more.
There is a huge difference between arguing about doctrine development & when fundamental belief existed. This happened with all schools of thought. They came after the Prophet!
He neglects to say Imam Sadiq narrated from his father & his father etc back to the Prophet. The fundamentals of Shia belief existed in the time of the Prophet. All fiqh that came after doesn't change that. If tried his salaf argument no it is same situation their fiqh didn't come until later
MashaAllah beautiful knowledge Ustad Adnan ❤
Christians claims to fallow Jesus and take their religion from pull. Shia cliams to fallow آل البيت and then fallow zuraeah and hesham and hesham . Shia and Christianity are identical twins.
24:16 Adnan dishonesty again telling Shia their belief accord to his twisted view. Then his false claims being corrected. We have Hadith refering even to the Prophet time of the Shia of Ali & Prophet successors which he conveniently ignores like they don't exist. When knows they do.
1:06:14 Really brother Adnan? Thats very shallow of you to slander the likes of Sheikh Fawzan
Sheikh Fawzan is not the Grand Mufti.
some good shai are doing is helping gaza and the holy land .
No they’re not
Stories
@@SalimKa thats what the people in gaza say
Wow!!! Adnan rashid absolutely played with him like jimmy savil use to play with them kids!!!
Delete
Blind fanboy
1:06:15 . That's a mistake from bro Adnan. Saudi Arabia is defending the Dawa of twheed and fighting against Bida. they don't allow Bida and they spirit Dawa twheed in all country. and they defined yemen and the kaba from hoothy. all that is nothing .....
I think he is taking about Ala shaikh
@@MohOz yes... Twheed and agents Beda.
Shia the worshiper of Shia Ali not even the Muslim one.
Shia are lost
Kufi la Yufi
Adnan what has Saudi done for Islam apart from destroying Afghanistan Pakistan was founded by a Twelver shia
Pakistan was not founded by isna ashari, he was an Ismaili whom the isna ashari consider heretics
Destroying Afghanistan!!? How did we do that!!!?
By the founder you mean Muhammad Jinnah!? His background majority Nizari Shia while he went to Sunni Islam and his relatives said that.
@@napolien1310 Watch his funeral no such thing happened lol just lies and type Muhammad jinnah funeral controversy.
Hey 🍊 t cheat go away from 📷
adnan is so irrational, and becomes evn more so when the shia brother proves a point. goes to ad hominins.
i think you are the one who do ad hominem right now..
What point did this shia prove?
Adnan is a fool lol
Sia butt hurt lol
Why?
how many dads do you have?
When the foolish people like you can’t responds to the valid points, they start laughing like insane lol
24:39 Adnan fails miserably again claims we don't have many Hadith from Imam Ali! Sunni have more. Here he caught out blatantly lying. Does he not know we have books on Imam Ali sermons alone! Nahjul balagha! Sunni don't have anything in comparison.
Lol you don't have chain of narration for nahjul balaga, somebody 400 years after Ali RA passed got up and said Ali said this. Shiaism has no legs. Lies lies and lies
@@al.mughira Are you a child? Do think mocking & ridiculing is islamic?
Do have any real knowledge on islam?
Clearly not there a scholar who gone through nahjah balagh cross referenced with hadith which agree with chains. Seriously when come like a child mocking & ridiculing saying like a child you won have some real knowledge.
Don't be a jahil fanboy of liar like Adnan it just shows how even more jahil you are
@@al.mughira Ibn Hadid a sunni schloar had no problem with it. Actually no one questioned it authenticity until hundreds of years later
@@Shia.AhlulbaytShia are najis. Go cry in the corner. Donkeys of jews followers of liars and the killers of ahle bait.
@@al.mughira remind me you hypocrite when was Bukhari, Muslim etc written.
Which caliph forbid the writing of Hadith?
Oh yeah the ones you follow. After read those collected. Guess he didn't like the truth. Irony at time when hadiths would have been at their most authentic straight after the prophet it is your faith that denied it.
You hypocrite want to attack when nahjul balagha was compiled
Abubakr umer and usman were like nawaj sharif,zardari ishaq dar. They would say ya allah madad on their mouth but had no character.
Nauzubillah. These words are going to hit you in akhira
@@adamjin777 why, does islam tell us to follow abubakr, umer and uthman, if yes then I should be running away in battles too.
Our Jumma khudba we mention their names highly. Ashra Mubashira given tydings of Jannah. Think. And most times with Prophet is them two.
@@Islamandpeacedawah probably this is the reason nothing good comes out of you and a small country like Israel is beating the crap out of you.
Isis, taliban, ttp, tlp, bokoharam, alqaeda all love Abubakr umer and uthman.
Great example iran
Hitler loved Jesus..so what does it prove?
ISIS was a creattion by the CIA
@@DarkDawn According to Muslims Christian teachings have been corrupted so obviously Hitler was not following the right teachings, however the above mentioned Nutjobs all follow abubakr, umer and uthman to the letter.
Also Hitler wars were not motivated by religion. when Isis is slitting thoats of people and raping women they say sahaba did it.
May Allah increase you brain capacity