Since I started to watch your videos just 3 weeks ago or so, I’ve been improving in my service, and watching vids like this one really helps me being conscious of the way I move and play. Very helpful, very inspiring, just to get the best out of me even if I’m a 57 year old recreational tennis player. Thank you so much!
Yes! Viewers criticize me for it but...I believe you shouldn’t learn something until you get it right, but rather, learn it until you can’t get it wrong. Thanks!! 👍
Thanks again Brian! It's so nice too see that you love tennis so much and that you explain in detail what you think in every aspect. Very useful! Cheers! /André Sweden
I have been really getting into the way you teach tennis. It is always on point. The first down the line after the return (from Stanford) did not hurt Berkley because it was not deep enough just like the return was short.
THIS IS BRILLIANT ... maybe a bit long (I would have gotten the main points in 15 minutes as well) - but very elaborate & very precise & very closely watched - THANK YOU very much - there were two things in there I NEVER did - and will do from NOW on (defensive shot to the feet of the attacker & move forward at the net to cut off the angles of the passing shot) ... a few more of those videos, RYAN, and I definitely will become a MUCH better player - I LOVE 2MinuteTennis !
You are the best Instructor & It is a very great lesson & precise explanation. I have a very good understanding of Tennis after watching your videos. Thanks.
Nice overall analysis! I think the biggest mistake was when the Stanford player approached from the baseline, giving the Cal player a chance to hit something low and hard to the Stanford player's feet. Very bad decision there, although it's always tough in the heat of the battle.
I hear you. But smart to do that when your opponent is in trouble. He simply waited for the ball to get to him then approached. Would be so much better if he attacked the ball with his feet then approached. Appreciate coach!!
Attackiing was really a poor choice at this point. The dark player was way to far behind the baseline with his attacking shot. When the white player took his shot the attacking player just barely made it 5 ft beyond the baseline. Leaving the court wide open to either side. If you watch the picture at 11:09 and the arrows drawn into it you will notice, that the longline passing shot would have been devastating. Not only was the dark player to far behind, but he also failed to "shadow" the same side his opponent was hitting from.
The Dark Player is also poorly positioned. He should, like you call it "seesaw" at the baseline (5:55) and "shadowing" when coming to the net (11:06), which he doesn´t. Therefore I disagree with the low ball as the best option. Generally speaking it is true. But in this instance I would have gone for the longline passing shot at 11:06, because of the poorly positioned Dark Player. Thank you for this great analysis.
Thx Ryan, great explanations as always. I love your analysis, i learn everyday from it...and i bought the playbook you mentioned already. One remark: if the black player had gone closer to the net, i'm sure the white would have made a lob. Especially against pusher or moonballer players i see that a lot... afterwards it looks clear...
Great video and breakdown. I guess this goes without saying, but a lot of these decisions are about feel for the game. For instance, when the Stanford guy hits the shot down the line after the return of serve, yes the line is wide open, but if your opponent is already sprinting that way, going cross court could wrong foot him, and changing momentum on the dead run is not so easy. That said, if your opponent is a little slower, then yeah make him run side to side.
I sure that, I have many mistake when play single, that why i fell loss many point and not understand, We think that when run close net it can not be defence and return, we may need rethinking and try to close the ball angle, thank you.
In the beginning of the video, he should have hit that return toward down the middle of the court. You mention this in one of your other videos. He probably would have had a weak reply from the server or at least more time to readjust.
Singles Strategy Point Analysis | Stanford vs UC Berkeley
No I will not be sharing this video with a friend. I'm trying to win. Great video
Haha good thinking. Don’t share it! Thanks so much!!!
If your opponent gets better, you are better, jajaja come on! Share It! A great lesson
Haha I was secretly hoping he would share it. 😊🎾👍
@@2MinuteTennis when my tennis partners notice I've improved tremendously and ask me how I got so good, then I'll share the video 💛
Your dissecting helps me, a single game noob, make sense of each and every shot made and how the point was won. Love this! A big thank you!
Happy to help you Betty. ✅
Since I started to watch your videos just 3 weeks ago or so, I’ve been improving in my service, and watching vids like this one really helps me being conscious of the way I move and play. Very helpful, very inspiring, just to get the best out of me even if I’m a 57 year old recreational tennis player. Thank you so much!
Marcel...I’m so happy to hear the videos are helping you!! Thank you so much!!
I´m glad you explain everything repetitive so it really sets into our recreational players´minds. Thanks!
Yes! Viewers criticize me for it but...I believe you shouldn’t learn something until you get it right, but rather, learn it until you can’t get it wrong. Thanks!! 👍
Insightful analysis! Would love to see more of these
Thanks again Brian! It's so nice too see that you love tennis so much and that you explain in detail what you think in every aspect. Very useful! Cheers! /André Sweden
I have been really getting into the way you teach tennis. It is always on point. The first down the line after the return (from Stanford) did not hurt Berkley because it was not deep enough just like the return was short.
THIS IS BRILLIANT ... maybe a bit long (I would have gotten the main points in 15 minutes as well) - but very elaborate & very precise & very closely watched - THANK YOU very much - there were two things in there I NEVER did - and will do from NOW on (defensive shot to the feet of the attacker & move forward at the net to cut off the angles of the passing shot) ... a few more of those videos, RYAN, and I definitely will become a MUCH better player - I LOVE 2MinuteTennis !
Thank you Florian! I really appreciate the kind words.
You are the best Instructor & It is a very great lesson & precise explanation. I have a very good understanding of Tennis after watching your videos. Thanks.
I've learned at least a couple of new things from this video. Thanks very much coach!
Happy to help Brian!
Great video Ryan so useful to pick apart multiple elements in a single point. More like this please
Yes! Glad it helped you. And I’ll def be making more videos like this!
Nice overall analysis! I think the biggest mistake was when the Stanford player approached from the baseline, giving the Cal player a chance to hit something low and hard to the Stanford player's feet. Very bad decision there, although it's always tough in the heat of the battle.
I hear you. But smart to do that when your opponent is in trouble. He simply waited for the ball to get to him then approached. Would be so much better if he attacked the ball with his feet then approached. Appreciate coach!!
Attackiing was really a poor choice at this point. The dark player was way to far behind the baseline with his attacking shot. When the white player took his shot the attacking player just barely made it 5 ft beyond the baseline. Leaving the court wide open to either side. If you watch the picture at 11:09 and the arrows drawn into it you will notice, that the longline passing shot would have been devastating. Not only was the dark player to far behind, but he also failed to "shadow" the same side his opponent was hitting from.
@@OliverWolter I concur! It was a poor decision
What a great video! Thanks Ryan!! Please do more videos like these!
Superb video analysis Ryan! Thanks!
Thank you so much Rick!
The Dark Player is also poorly positioned. He should, like you call it "seesaw" at the baseline (5:55) and "shadowing" when coming to the net (11:06), which he doesn´t. Therefore I disagree with the low ball as the best option. Generally speaking it is true. But in this instance I would have gone for the longline passing shot at 11:06, because of the poorly positioned Dark Player.
Thank you for this great analysis.
Thx Ryan, great explanations as always. I love your analysis, i learn everyday from it...and i bought the playbook you mentioned already.
One remark: if the black player had gone closer to the net, i'm sure the white would have made a lob. Especially against pusher or moonballer players i see that a lot... afterwards it looks clear...
Please more videos like this one ! Thank you so much !
So much to learn from a single point👍👍
Great Analysis. Thanks!
Thanks so much AJ! Appreciate it!
Amazing analysis!!
Great video and breakdown. I guess this goes without saying, but a lot of these decisions are about feel for the game. For instance, when the Stanford guy hits the shot down the line after the return of serve, yes the line is wide open, but if your opponent is already sprinting that way, going cross court could wrong foot him, and changing momentum on the dead run is not so easy. That said, if your opponent is a little slower, then yeah make him run side to side.
100% agree. Thanks for the comment!!
Very interesting and well explained. Thanks!
I just love your analagies 👍
Thanks so much David!!!
A step up from your other videos. Kudos, good job
Thanks so much Scott! Appreciate the support!
I sure that, I have many mistake when play single, that why i fell loss many point and not understand, We think that when run close net it can not be defence and return, we may need rethinking and try to close the ball angle, thank you.
Was going to the net for the first time a mistake from the player in black? What should him have done to avoid turning offense in defense?
Useful analysis and great explanation, perhaps a bit long and redundant. Thanks!
Love this!
Good job 👌
Thank you so much Ahmed.
Nice video.. thank you very much
Won't the other player lob him if going further to the net to near?
In the beginning of the video, he should have hit that return toward down the middle of the court. You mention this in one of your other videos. He probably would have had a weak reply from the server or at least more time to readjust.
I need to see this lesson many times, jajaja.
Podcast?! subscribed
Cool vid
Thanks Andrew. Appreciate it my friend!
Crap. I've already liked this yesterday
channel title: 2 minute tennis
video: 31:45
Social Network: Facebook
What it is: Not a book of faces
😊
@@2MinuteTennis hahaha good analogy
The wanting switch isely contain because processing ethnopharmacologically scream with a domineering boundary. aquatic, crowded alarm
Thanks so much Diana!