They learn their lesson with unity and then forget it, and then they act like they're learning it with Mirage by going back to a more simple style, but then they start making 11 other games at the same time. I don't get this company.
What, you don't think a company rumored to be in serious financial trouble should throw as many darts against the wall as possible and assume that people are just going to love whatever they do because it has the Assassin's Creed name on the box? Pffft. I mean, it's not like they're so convinced that people will love Skull & Bones even after its meme-level delays and rumors that they'll just go ahead and start making a Black Flag remake, or anything!
It's crazy how they could have printed money by just making a Black Flag sequel instead of Skull and Bones but dropped the ball hard on it. They could have even done a spin-off multiplayer game or experience for their little microtransaction fest and people would have bought it. But no... they know better than you and I...
@@mohammadashikurrahman7530 don’t think yearly releases is a good idea, this could lead to franchise fatigue and stagnation, along with games potentially getting rushed. I’d rather see quality over quantity, and it is not the best idea for Ubisoft to lay all their eggs into one basket. And it is clear Ubisoft may not have learned from Unity.
@@mohammadashikurrahman7530 nah I believe pumping out games like this and not giving anymore time is gonna result in them plateauing in some way. I have seen this happen with other games like Need For Speed where each game seems to improve upon something but is a step backwards in another part. And I don’t believe Red and Hexe have been in development for that long, I mean wasn’t Hexe in the concept stage when it was first announced? And Red might have some trouble behind the scenes and the studio working on it has dealt with a exodus of employees due to the fear culture caused by the director’s presence. I also have some other concerns such as the rumours that one of the protagonists is an African Shinobi, I have a reason to believe that they put this character for diversity reasons, this is the same team that worked on Syndicate which had a transgender character and their reason was for “diversity and inclusion” or something like that. And I heard the portrayal of the Persians in Odyssey is very historically inaccurate that they might have watched 300 instead of doing actual research. Pumping out yearly releases is how Unity had a buggy launch in the beginning, even the story felt rushed, and it looks like they are going back to those releases.
@@mohammadashikurrahman7530 Where is your evidence that those two games have been in development for awhile? But not every game face issues when in development. AC is BASED on actual history, and how am I out of touch? Just look it up, there are people who criticized the unfaithful portrayal of the Persians in this game and western media in general. And yeah, those games were only good because that was before Ubisoft started going downhill. Also, 3 was actually rushed in a way. And I don’t understand what you mean by diversifying AC.
@@mohammadashikurrahman7530 you sure it doesn’t start after the DLCs get released? Even if Red is Taking longer, you still got to keep in mind there has been trouble behind the scenes as the studio working on it dealt with an exodus of devs, and they may be pushing it back because of that. And you got to keep in mind, Legion went through internal delays because the play as anyone gimmick was a headache for the devs, and the public delay was caused by GR: Breakpoint. All those delays and the game still turned out to be a disappointment, I don’t want to hear anything about the pandemic because they were heading in this direction with the games before the pandemic. We don’t know what is going on with Hexe either, I still don’t have a good feeling about that one because it could potentially be another generic modern Ubisoft game, and could have writing that is a downgrade from the older games. Is rewriting another country’s history in a way that pushes propaganda by portraying them in a way they weren’t back then considered mixed fiction? Unity was broken because it was rushed, and it was rushed because the higher ups wanted to push out the games yearly instead of giving more time, and now they seem to be going back to yearly releases. This ain’t gonna end well. If you want to know how 3 was rushed, Google is free. I don’t remember saying it was a bad idea to diversify the franchise with these different types of games. I think you may have gotten mixed up with something else.
not only the playerbase are only split, also the newer players who want try one of the games are confused and cant decide which game to play. my friend's brother asked me which game should i play. i told on what basis you want to play (playstyle, story or chonological order, RPG..). he said he wanted to play the newer trilogy. so i told him play Origins, then Odessy then Valhalla, and i explained to him how the modern story are somehow connected t each other and each game has different style to play (gameplay layout)
I can't even imagine a Black Flag Remake. The game is pretty solid as is. The graphics are pretty good even by todays standards, It has some of the best sailing in the series, The parkour is a bit wonk, but every game kinda has that problem. I just can't think of anything needing improvement
Ubisoft already made the mistake of releasing Unity and Rogue on the same day even though both games needed more development time. Do they really want to face this issue of releasing too many games at once again?
I agree that these game companies that are pushing the single-player stories to have an instant internet connection is a worrisome future I mean it's already happening with some games but why it's worrisome is the fact that they want to try to do it more and more and someone like me that doesn't really have access to the internet that would affect me greatly to where if they do that all the time I would never be able to play another new game ever again now I get that multiplayer games are online that's the way they've always been and that's fine but why must they mess with the single-player stories like that I don't know but it's definitely a worrisome future for the single player campaigns
I'll be surprised if one of these games is a sequel to one of the protagonists from the main games, aside from maybe Hex with Ezio, Kassandra, and Connor.
Honestly I think mirage will be worse than a lot of people anticipate. The teleportation multi-kill skill just looks stupid I have no clue why they wouldn’t just do a similar system to the fear takedowns in Arkham knight.
The series used to have a distinct identity & an actual end goal in mind, but once the money started flooding in overtime game after game Ubisoft changed studio heads & after a lot of other general creative staff turnovers later, they scrapped all of their original plans for an ending to the franchise & now this franchise has now dragged on for soo long eventually the Studio has just lost all ambitions to make actual AC Games & turned it into *THE GOAT FRANCHISE* for all of the different game ideas & pitches that were made with original IP’s in mind that Ubisoft just had absolutely no faith would sell if it was it’s own brand new IP’s so they just *SLAPPED THE ASSASSIN’S CREED LABEL ONTO IT* & called it a day. Only now after the public reception for their upcoming financial blunder called Skull & Bones has completely plummeted Ubisoft has now completely lost faith in anything & everything that isn’t Assassin’s Creed will sell so they’ve completely jumped the shark all the way up into sun by turning everything they’ve been pitched from these past several years into Assassin’s Creed projects..
I have noticed a mess of issues since my OC: old release glitches returning, mission waypoint will not load until you fast travel somewhere, and your outfit will random revert to Edward's main one even after manually changing it to a different one. It's been four days, so far, and (so far as I know) no word from Ubisoft. It seems rather convenient for them to leak an AC4 remake right before "patching" a game that worked really well before.
i agree however, the thing that would be worse is if they did what they did in valhalla, where they didnt do stealth good enough to help old fans but also wasnt a better rpg than odyssey making no one happy, instead of bringing in the vr and whatever hexe is and the multiplayer they should do an old style game then an rpg the an old style game then an rpg.
From what you are saying, there really are not a lot of games I would engage with anyway. Multiplayer? Nope. Mobile? Nope, VR? Nope. So really there are only a few titles on this list that I will even care about. As long as the development teams are independent and large enough it won't affect me. I am also fine with short tight AC games and large open world AC games. You can have both.
I'm excited for Mirage because I quit playing this game when it became an RPG; now I don't care that there are RPG games; I miss the linear story AC games. I also really, really want Brotherhood multiplayer back!!
The one reason that I don’t mind them planning to have titles come out annually is because consoles just keep becoming obsolete too quickly relative to how freaking long it takes to make a series game nowadays. For example, with the Arkham Franchise, there were three (awesome) games in the series that released on PS3, when PS4 stopped being the main system, it had only one (also awesome) original Arkham game that you could play it on. Sure there were the remakes of Asylum and City, but I already had those and the remakes were kind of just half-@$$ed and painted over and not really worth buying. Also Suicide Squad is not an Arkham game, it just takes place in Arkham’s universe. And Gotham Knights was a lousy game with even lousier versions of the characters we love. Another example, Offline(aka permanently playable) Fallout and Skyrim games on XBox 360 vs XBox One. There were three original Elder Scrolls games and 2 original Fallout Games on the prior generation, all good in their own right. In the next console generation there has been only one original offline Fallout game. Skyrim got a fantastic deluxe remaster, but that was it. Unless they make fully functional offline versions of ESO and Fallout 76, with any and all events revisit-able in-game, those games will not count for jack, seeing as they will stay MMOs doomed to die. As stupid as it sounds, them making 8 AC games in 8 years will at least ensure that you are not buying a new console every decade just for one new game. Now, the games probably won’t be perfect and massive and will probably need to recycle engines, but I would rather play Assassin’s Creed Rogue and Assassin’s Creed III over Assassin’s Creed Valhalla any day of the week. The only really big expansive game worth taking up a quarter of my 2 Terabyte Hard Drive is Red Dead Redemption 2. It doesn’t take you an hour just to kill a named character, has been constantly and lovingly improved with attention to detail, and overall doesn’t cripple your thumbs.
This is a dumb move by Ubisoft. Fans are going to get burned out really quickly if they keep releasing games back to back. Specially if the quality with some of them drops.
In my opinion, Ubisoft has been making mistakes since its origins to Valhalla and now if they are trying to fix mistakes that have been a thing since the past they are surely failing bc they need to focus on one game at a time not 11
I'm someone that's looking forward to the 11 titles. But those 11 titles could either be successes or flops. It won't be a mistake if all the titles are successes, but it will be a disaster that even if they're successes they don't follow the roots of the franchise.
Thats the thing - if they're all great, awesome. More great games is more great games. Personally, I haven't seen many examples of companies overloading their schedule though and it turning out well. If it does, I'll be more than happy.
I swear at this point Ubisoft should just conclude yhe assassins creed sotry to a final outcome and jus trove on to another project before they go backrupt
To make things even weirder, Ys 10 will be coming out soon with similar Naval combat to Black Flag. Note that Ys 9 came out just a couple of years ago and had you doing parkour in an Italian styled city like AC2/Brotherhood. But somehow, an Action JRPG doing these concepts over a decade later feels fresh. I'm not disparaging Ys btw, I love the series, also shoutout to Falcom for allowing content creators to use the music from their games for free in their videos* *with the reasonable caveats that Falcom and their teams are credited, and the videos aren't behind a paywall.
I dont get why they're remaking black flag. Why not remake ac1 instead? The only games i think deserve a remake are ac1, ac2, brotherhood and MAAAAAAYBE revelations.
"What is Assassin's Creed?" ? Look, i love the franchise. I love the ideas behind it and the historical setting. But that story ended when Desmond was killed off. Assassin's Creed was over at that moment. Done. Dead. Everything after it has been a self-contained Simpson's episode with varying levels of quality. Origins was a masterpiece that came close to capturing what the legacy (1-3) games did but it had no modern day story, it had more RPG elements than story to talk of. It felt like a very immersive and high quality simulation of how Bayek did his duties as a Medjai in ancient Egypt. And that was totally fine! But it wasn't the same thing as looking to uncover the secrets of an ancient civilization to save the world in the modern day, all the while there is an ancient order of templars doing the same both in that past and present trying to stop you all the while there is a goddamn power struggle in the past that the ancestor has to deal with. That shit was filled with history and intrigue! It is mostly gone now. What is Assassin's Creed? It's a yearly franchise now. Think Call of Duty.
11 AC games 🤦🤦🤦 Why? Seriously they better give it their all and at least have three bad ones and the rest is good. They should be focusing on mirage since it's coming out in October. Honestly I'm concerned why is mirage fifty bucks are they hiding something from us.
I played each one with AC2 being my first AC, origins being my favorite AC game to date I love that game sm exploring Egypt and a great character protagonist in bayek, just seeing the brotherhoods origins is fascinating and hidden ones is the best DLC Ubisoft put out right next to Blood dragon imo
But also Odyssey is pretty fun tho demi god powers made it enjoyable aswell as playing kassandra than alexios, Valhalla is really just meh odyssey was better combat wise
people should understant the rpg games are making a lot more money than the older ones ubisoft is making a mistake trying to pull back the old fans they should focus on the new fans by the way im one of the old fans who hadnt any problems with the rpg games
Yeah how did rpg games exactly solve their financial issue again? Sales vs player longevity rpg kids typically forget that both odyssey and Valhalla baited the AC community into thinking that they were going to be good AC games which they weren't hence why mirage just for simply having a teleport ability is getting so much shit lol but hey keep using the sales number as an excuse for your games being shit
FarCry, Assassins creed, Mortal Kombat/injustice and any left 4 dead rip offs all fail in my opinion bc of the shitty "rpg" mechanics they keep trying to cram into everything. They are ruining everything... like we said we wanted something new to spice things up, and these lazy bastards just slapped health bars and a leveling system on everything and called it innovation.. and somehow ppl are ok with this??
They learn their lesson with unity and then forget it, and then they act like they're learning it with Mirage by going back to a more simple style, but then they start making 11 other games at the same time. I don't get this company.
they're clearly trying to appease ALL types of fans, which most of us will agree can be disastrous..
remember that this is after cancelling 7 unannounced projects lol
I feel like resurrecting an older meme "We heard you like Assassin's Creed, so we put Assassin's Creed in your Assassin's Creed"
animus within an animus when...
What, you don't think a company rumored to be in serious financial trouble should throw as many darts against the wall as possible and assume that people are just going to love whatever they do because it has the Assassin's Creed name on the box? Pffft. I mean, it's not like they're so convinced that people will love Skull & Bones even after its meme-level delays and rumors that they'll just go ahead and start making a Black Flag remake, or anything!
It's crazy how they could have printed money by just making a Black Flag sequel instead of Skull and Bones but dropped the ball hard on it. They could have even done a spin-off multiplayer game or experience for their little microtransaction fest and people would have bought it. But no... they know better than you and I...
I think if Ubisoft got the the people they hire to one title game instead of spending them apart there games would be 10x better imo
@@mohammadashikurrahman7530any better ideas? Is what they are currently doing gonna make things any better?
@@mohammadashikurrahman7530 don’t think yearly releases is a good idea, this could lead to franchise fatigue and stagnation, along with games potentially getting rushed.
I’d rather see quality over quantity, and it is not the best idea for Ubisoft to lay all their eggs into one basket.
And it is clear Ubisoft may not have learned from Unity.
@@mohammadashikurrahman7530 nah I believe pumping out games like this and not giving anymore time is gonna result in them plateauing in some way. I have seen this happen with other games like Need For Speed where each game seems to improve upon something but is a step backwards in another part.
And I don’t believe Red and Hexe have been in development for that long, I mean wasn’t Hexe in the concept stage when it was first announced? And Red might have some trouble behind the scenes and the studio working on it has dealt with a exodus of employees due to the fear culture caused by the director’s presence. I also have some other concerns such as the rumours that one of the protagonists is an African Shinobi, I have a reason to believe that they put this character for diversity reasons, this is the same team that worked on Syndicate which had a transgender character and their reason was for “diversity and inclusion” or something like that. And I heard the portrayal of the Persians in Odyssey is very historically inaccurate that they might have watched 300 instead of doing actual research.
Pumping out yearly releases is how Unity had a buggy launch in the beginning, even the story felt rushed, and it looks like they are going back to those releases.
@@mohammadashikurrahman7530
Where is your evidence that those two games have been in development for awhile?
But not every game face issues when in development.
AC is BASED on actual history, and how am I out of touch? Just look it up, there are people who criticized the unfaithful portrayal of the Persians in this game and western media in general.
And yeah, those games were only good because that was before Ubisoft started going downhill. Also, 3 was actually rushed in a way.
And I don’t understand what you mean by diversifying AC.
@@mohammadashikurrahman7530 you sure it doesn’t start after the DLCs get released? Even if Red is Taking longer, you still got to keep in mind there has been trouble behind the scenes as the studio working on it dealt with an exodus of devs, and they may be pushing it back because of that.
And you got to keep in mind, Legion went through internal delays because the play as anyone gimmick was a headache for the devs, and the public delay was caused by GR: Breakpoint. All those delays and the game still turned out to be a disappointment, I don’t want to hear anything about the pandemic because they were heading in this direction with the games before the pandemic.
We don’t know what is going on with Hexe either, I still don’t have a good feeling about that one because it could potentially be another generic modern Ubisoft game, and could have writing that is a downgrade from the older games.
Is rewriting another country’s history in a way that pushes propaganda by portraying them in a way they weren’t back then considered mixed fiction?
Unity was broken because it was rushed, and it was rushed because the higher ups wanted to push out the games yearly instead of giving more time, and now they seem to be going back to yearly releases. This ain’t gonna end well.
If you want to know how 3 was rushed, Google is free.
I don’t remember saying it was a bad idea to diversify the franchise with these different types of games. I think you may have gotten mixed up with something else.
not only the playerbase are only split, also the newer players who want try one of the games are confused and cant decide which game to play. my friend's brother asked me which game should i play. i told on what basis you want to play (playstyle, story or chonological order, RPG..). he said he wanted to play the newer trilogy. so i told him play Origins, then Odessy then Valhalla, and i explained to him how the modern story are somehow connected t each other and each game has different style to play (gameplay layout)
I can't even imagine a Black Flag Remake. The game is pretty solid as is. The graphics are pretty good even by todays standards, It has some of the best sailing in the series, The parkour is a bit wonk, but every game kinda has that problem. I just can't think of anything needing improvement
There’s no need for a black flag remake the game holds up well. They’d be better off doing older games like ac 1, 2 or brotherhood
There is no point to remake any game post-HD era other than for a cash grab.
@@EmergencyChannel most likely just using assets from skull and bones to make use of that flop of a game
Ubisoft already made the mistake of releasing Unity and Rogue on the same day even though both games needed more development time. Do they really want to face this issue of releasing too many games at once again?
I agree that these game companies that are pushing the single-player stories to have an instant internet connection is a worrisome future I mean it's already happening with some games but why it's worrisome is the fact that they want to try to do it more and more and someone like me that doesn't really have access to the internet that would affect me greatly to where if they do that all the time I would never be able to play another new game ever again now I get that multiplayer games are online that's the way they've always been and that's fine but why must they mess with the single-player stories like that I don't know but it's definitely a worrisome future for the single player campaigns
Agreed! Internet's not a problem for me, but I still refuse to get online-only games. I just wanna rely on my console and tv to enjoy single-player.
dude i didnt know you had all these other outlets, thats super talented!
Hey jay is the stay schway thing from batman beyond? Thats the only place ive heard it other than here
I am excited for red with it being in Japan and hex being set during the Salem witch trials if I'm not mistaken
It's probably not Salem, it seems to be Germany. Salem might be the most famous, but the biggest witch hunts happened in Germany.
@@RaRmAn Yeah and the project name is called "Hexe". German for "Witch"
I'll be surprised if one of these games is a sequel to one of the protagonists from the main games, aside from maybe Hex with Ezio, Kassandra, and Connor.
Honestly I think mirage will be worse than a lot of people anticipate. The teleportation multi-kill skill just looks stupid I have no clue why they wouldn’t just do a similar system to the fear takedowns in Arkham knight.
The series used to have a distinct identity & an actual end goal in mind, but once the money started flooding in overtime game after game Ubisoft changed studio heads & after a lot of other general creative staff turnovers later, they scrapped all of their original plans for an ending to the franchise & now this franchise has now dragged on for soo long eventually the Studio has just lost all ambitions to make actual AC Games & turned it into *THE GOAT FRANCHISE* for all of the different game ideas & pitches that were made with original IP’s in mind that Ubisoft just had absolutely no faith would sell if it was it’s own brand new IP’s so they just *SLAPPED THE ASSASSIN’S CREED LABEL ONTO IT* & called it a day.
Only now after the public reception for their upcoming financial blunder called Skull & Bones has completely plummeted Ubisoft has now completely lost faith in anything & everything that isn’t Assassin’s Creed will sell so they’ve completely jumped the shark all the way up into sun by turning everything they’ve been pitched from these past several years into Assassin’s Creed projects..
Ubisoft doing way to much ac is just sad. I would like to see a new rayman game then anymore ac games.
Rayman and Splinter Cell both deserve some attention.
@@DegenerateJay agreed.
Ubi$oft is taking the "throw darts at a board and see what sticks" approach. If that doesn't highlight how desperate they are, nothing does.
Have you seen the new (crap) Steam update for Blackflag? It added a full screen option that cannot be undone! 🙃
I have noticed a mess of issues since my OC: old release glitches returning, mission waypoint will not load until you fast travel somewhere, and your outfit will random revert to Edward's main one even after manually changing it to a different one. It's been four days, so far, and (so far as I know) no word from Ubisoft. It seems rather convenient for them to leak an AC4 remake right before "patching" a game that worked really well before.
i agree however, the thing that would be worse is if they did what they did in valhalla, where they didnt do stealth good enough to help old fans but also wasnt a better rpg than odyssey making no one happy, instead of bringing in the vr and whatever hexe is and the multiplayer they should do an old style game then an rpg the an old style game then an rpg.
From what you are saying, there really are not a lot of games I would engage with anyway. Multiplayer? Nope. Mobile? Nope, VR? Nope. So really there are only a few titles on this list that I will even care about. As long as the development teams are independent and large enough it won't affect me. I am also fine with short tight AC games and large open world AC games. You can have both.
I'm excited for Mirage because I quit playing this game when it became an RPG; now I don't care that there are RPG games; I miss the linear story AC games. I also really, really want Brotherhood multiplayer back!!
The one reason that I don’t mind them planning to have titles come out annually is because consoles just keep becoming obsolete too quickly relative to how freaking long it takes to make a series game nowadays.
For example, with the Arkham Franchise, there were three (awesome) games in the series that released on PS3, when PS4 stopped being the main system, it had only one (also awesome) original Arkham game that you could play it on. Sure there were the remakes of Asylum and City, but I already had those and the remakes were kind of just half-@$$ed and painted over and not really worth buying. Also Suicide Squad is not an Arkham game, it just takes place in Arkham’s universe. And Gotham Knights was a lousy game with even lousier versions of the characters we love.
Another example, Offline(aka permanently playable) Fallout and Skyrim games on XBox 360 vs XBox One. There were three original Elder Scrolls games and 2 original Fallout Games on the prior generation, all good in their own right. In the next console generation there has been only one original offline Fallout game. Skyrim got a fantastic deluxe remaster, but that was it. Unless they make fully functional offline versions of ESO and Fallout 76, with any and all events revisit-able in-game, those games will not count for jack, seeing as they will stay MMOs doomed to die.
As stupid as it sounds, them making 8 AC games in 8 years will at least ensure that you are not buying a new console every decade just for one new game. Now, the games probably won’t be perfect and massive and will probably need to recycle engines, but I would rather play Assassin’s Creed Rogue and Assassin’s Creed III over Assassin’s Creed Valhalla any day of the week.
The only really big expansive game worth taking up a quarter of my 2 Terabyte Hard Drive is Red Dead Redemption 2. It doesn’t take you an hour just to kill a named character, has been constantly and lovingly improved with attention to detail, and overall doesn’t cripple your thumbs.
The best they should do is remake black flag ,1 ,and ezio games,then have one present main story ac game what ever they go
This is a dumb move by Ubisoft. Fans are going to get burned out really quickly if they keep releasing games back to back. Specially if the quality with some of them drops.
In my opinion, Ubisoft has been making mistakes since its origins to Valhalla and now if they are trying to fix mistakes that have been a thing since the past they are surely failing bc they need to focus on one game at a time not 11
Threads has censorship.
It's time for gaming industry to understand that people doesn't have infinite amount of money and time. You can't milk us forever.
I'm someone that's looking forward to the 11 titles.
But those 11 titles could either be successes or flops.
It won't be a mistake if all the titles are successes, but it will be a disaster that even if they're successes they don't follow the roots of the franchise.
Thats the thing - if they're all great, awesome. More great games is more great games. Personally, I haven't seen many examples of companies overloading their schedule though and it turning out well. If it does, I'll be more than happy.
if they haven't already been milking the AC name for all it's worth they are now
If I'm getting my Assassin creed in the setting I want, I'm NOT complaining
I genuinely think they should bring back desmond.
This company is the master of focusing on quantity over quality. 🤦♂️
I swear at this point Ubisoft should just conclude yhe assassins creed sotry to a final outcome and jus trove on to another project before they go backrupt
To make things even weirder, Ys 10 will be coming out soon with similar Naval combat to Black Flag.
Note that Ys 9 came out just a couple of years ago and had you doing parkour in an Italian styled city like AC2/Brotherhood.
But somehow, an Action JRPG doing these concepts over a decade later feels fresh.
I'm not disparaging Ys btw, I love the series, also shoutout to Falcom for allowing content creators to use the music from their games for free in their videos*
*with the reasonable caveats that Falcom and their teams are credited, and the videos aren't behind a paywall.
I dont get why they're remaking black flag. Why not remake ac1 instead? The only games i think deserve a remake are ac1, ac2, brotherhood and MAAAAAAYBE revelations.
"What is Assassin's Creed?" ?
Look, i love the franchise. I love the ideas behind it and the historical setting. But that story ended when Desmond was killed off. Assassin's Creed was over at that moment. Done. Dead.
Everything after it has been a self-contained Simpson's episode with varying levels of quality. Origins was a masterpiece that came close to capturing what the legacy (1-3) games did but it had no modern day story, it had more RPG elements than story to talk of. It felt like a very immersive and high quality simulation of how Bayek did his duties as a Medjai in ancient Egypt. And that was totally fine! But it wasn't the same thing as looking to uncover the secrets of an ancient civilization to save the world in the modern day, all the while there is an ancient order of templars doing the same both in that past and present trying to stop you all the while there is a goddamn power struggle in the past that the ancestor has to deal with. That shit was filled with history and intrigue! It is mostly gone now.
What is Assassin's Creed? It's a yearly franchise now. Think Call of Duty.
Lol the only Assassins creed game im interested in is Nexus VR, just hope it provides good exercise as well.
I aint touching threads my guy, sorry.
Lettuce
Am i the only one who thinks black flag doesn't deserve a remake at all? Its not that good of a game imo, very overrated.
11 AC games 🤦🤦🤦 Why? Seriously they better give it their all and at least have three bad ones and the rest is good. They should be focusing on mirage since it's coming out in October. Honestly I'm concerned why is mirage fifty bucks are they hiding something from us.
It's a shorter game just like Rogue. That's why it's cheaper.
Twitter is better thanks
I mean social media in general is just terrible
Im the 1 thu syndicated crowd I HATE THE RPG elements why i quit after origins thank god for game pass ill play the old for free
I played each one with AC2 being my first AC, origins being my favorite AC game to date I love that game sm exploring Egypt and a great character protagonist in bayek, just seeing the brotherhoods origins is fascinating and hidden ones is the best DLC Ubisoft put out right next to Blood dragon imo
But also Odyssey is pretty fun tho demi god powers made it enjoyable aswell as playing kassandra than alexios, Valhalla is really just meh odyssey was better combat wise
people should understant the rpg games are making a lot more money than the older ones ubisoft is making a mistake trying to pull back the old fans they should focus on the new fans by the way im one of the old fans who hadnt any problems with the rpg games
Yeah how did rpg games exactly solve their financial issue again? Sales vs player longevity rpg kids typically forget that both odyssey and Valhalla baited the AC community into thinking that they were going to be good AC games which they weren't hence why mirage just for simply having a teleport ability is getting so much shit lol but hey keep using the sales number as an excuse for your games being shit
First
Best
FarCry, Assassins creed, Mortal Kombat/injustice and any left 4 dead rip offs all fail in my opinion bc of the shitty "rpg" mechanics they keep trying to cram into everything. They are ruining everything... like we said we wanted something new to spice things up, and these lazy bastards just slapped health bars and a leveling system on everything and called it innovation.. and somehow ppl are ok with this??
People are sheep