I never fail to be impressed by the excellent Radio Fiharmonisch Orkest surely just as fine as many more "famous" orchestras. So lucky to have so many recordings by them on Y.T.
@@bronxboy47 strange, I think her interpretation has nothing to do neither with the work nor with Poulenc. But it has a lot to do with her. what I mean we hear a lot of Patacca and not a lot of Poulenc...
@@singhsinga4592: I guess English is not your mother tongue. I have no idea what it is you just tried to say. But let me repeat and emphasize that your opinion of her voice definitely contradicts the opinion of the majority of people on this thread. Of course, you are entitled to your own opinion, but not to your own reality.
Really? I had no idea you had spoken to the gods of music and they handed you down a metronome marking that MUST be used! I was under the silly impression that music is open to interpretation. I actually find the 5th movement to be FAR more effective when it is slow and mysterious - like walking through mist. One could say the soprano should practice better breath control. Or perhaps, they both decided taking a breath was fine to get their creative interpretation across? Either way, I'd always be fascinated to watch complainers stand up on the podium and do some conducting of their own....
Why is this recording still on the internet? In the 2nd movement the afterbeat in the orchestra moves to the beat. It goes wrong due the movements of the conductor.
Omdat het extreem weer was met heel veel sneeuw en moeilijk begaanbare wegen was de uitverkochte zaal maar half gevuld.... Helaas.... Maar het mocht de pret niet drukken!
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 88 | คู่เอก "ป้อมเพชร vs อัสลามจอน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ZqTVVbMgbo/mqdefault.jpg)
I never fail to be impressed by the excellent Radio Fiharmonisch Orkest surely just as fine as many more "famous" orchestras. So lucky to have so many recordings by them on Y.T.
Gorgeous! Made me cry
Me Too!
me too
Love Claudia Patacca's voice. So ethereal and befitting this piece! It's also full of challenging pianissimos that she handles so beautifully!
Agreed. A mesmerizing voice perfectly suited to this work. It was a privilege to have heard this performance.
@@bronxboy47 strange, I think her interpretation has nothing to do neither with the work nor with Poulenc. But it has a lot to do with her. what I mean we hear a lot of Patacca and not a lot of Poulenc...
@@singhsinga4592 Yes, you're right. Your view is very strange--and at odds with just about everyone on this comment thread.
@@bronxboy47 if found all your opinions strange, how can you not hear what i said?!
@@singhsinga4592: I guess English is not your mother tongue. I have no idea what it is you just tried to say. But let me repeat and emphasize that your opinion of her voice definitely contradicts the opinion of the majority of people on this thread. Of course, you are entitled to your own opinion, but not to your own reality.
Performed this in college. Truly beautiful work. Love it.
At 4:15 the beat is almost lost amongst the orchestra and choir but later on steadies itself. Whew, that was close to a catastrophe!!!
ganz tolle Stimme !!!!!!!!!!
Really, Mr. Conductor? The fifth movement is too slow for the soprano to sing 'Qui tolls peccata mundi' in a single breath. VERY WRONG.
Really? I had no idea you had spoken to the gods of music and they handed you down a metronome marking that MUST be used! I was under the silly impression that music is open to interpretation. I actually find the 5th movement to be FAR more effective when it is slow and mysterious - like walking through mist. One could say the soprano should practice better breath control. Or perhaps, they both decided taking a breath was fine to get their creative interpretation across? Either way, I'd always be fascinated to watch complainers stand up on the podium and do some conducting of their own....
Perfection is difficult! And I don't think 18:36 to 18:47 sounds at all off!
organman52 cry about it
Actually organman, that is the composer's tempo, the soprano just isn't very good.
Why is this recording still on the internet? In the 2nd movement the afterbeat in the orchestra moves to the beat. It goes wrong due the movements of the conductor.
because the over all presentation of this piece outweighs that one mistake. It is very good. Bold, intense and a good live recording.
Ah-men
"En u hoort aan het applaus dat we best nog wel een volle zaal hebben hier" wat is dat nu voor commentaar? Die deur stond wagenwijd open
Omdat het extreem weer was met heel veel sneeuw en moeilijk begaanbare wegen was de uitverkochte zaal maar half gevuld.... Helaas.... Maar het mocht de pret niet drukken!
+claudia patacca ah, precies! Ik miste dat stukje context. Bedankt!
Far too little recognition - during the bows - of this excellent choir. SHAMEFUL.
HEAR HEAR
hiciere falta una voz de soprano más dinámica y fuerte !