Shocking Human Remains Found Beneath Stonehenge! | Blowing Up History
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ม.ค. 2019
- Archaeologist Jackie McKinley studies two of the skeletons found buried beneath Stonehenge, to find out more about who these people were and where they came from.
Subscribe to Discovery UK for more great clips:
th-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
Follow Discovery UK on Twitter:
/ discoveryuk - บันเทิง
Hold up....Americans get British people to narrate and the British get Americans to narrate?
Seems backwards.
good eye
@@murrayallan5251 😂
@Arthur Shilling who cares..
@Arthur Shilling no... Because not everyone lives in Europe
It's shocking how often the word shocking is used for something that's not shocking at all.
I find your statement 😱
Totally Shocking........NAWT !!!!!!
Putting an all metal knife in to a toaster that is switched on is pretty shocking this was just historical information.
Rest In Peace “literally” & “shocking”. You both used to mean something ten years ago!!
I admit I was shocked.😐
that corpse has better teeth than i do
For some reason most old skeletons do have better teeth than us nice and straight
I believe I heard somewhere that their jaws were slightly larger whereas our jaws are smaller and they crowd the teeth more than they would've in a bigger mouth.
They did not ingest the processed foods and the amounts of sugars we do either... nor were they pumped full of the other poisons we are, like flouride and more.
@@mamamarianovits9029 but they did eat grains
@@woodyahh2110
And.? Grains alone are not bad for us...
We are told these people were stupid compared to modern humans. I beg to differ.
I teach 9th graders. Modern humans are most definitely not smarter.
laser325 oh indeed, and I think our environment today, is much more backwards, hence we’re not as clever. I’d much rather live off the land, learning all the tricks of the stars, the earth, and nature around me. Today’s world is............ (to many negative words to put here so I’ll leave it with just the dots)
Clinton Reisig interesting
@blackzed You are the stupid one. Modern day humans are not less intelligent. They are not as resourceful due to the conveniences of modern day civilization. Has nothing to do with intelligence. Try thinking before posting stupid shit.
Most people weren't even literate ffs... Self reliance is an individual responsibility. If you can't feed or cloth yourself, it's your fault. Not that people who didn't even know what toilet paper were more intelligent because you're helpless to survive without modern conveniences.
I was gonna make a skeleton joke but i didn’t have the guts for it.
It's quite likely that excessive thirst in that condition left you less 'humerus'!!! 🤣
😂
Now that's not trying to be Black 😂 That was funny. Aleast he staying in his lane. 😂🇱🇷
Grow a back bone then lol
That was a rib-tickler
'Shocking' is unnecessarily clickbait. Just interesting archeology.
Yep and "history blown up" when discussing prehistoric matters . So the title is awfully crappy
I'm shocked! Completely in awe! I just can't believe this!!
Niall Wildwoode
From 1901 to 1964, the majority of the stone circle was restored in a series of makeovers which have left it, in the words of one archaeologist, as 'a product of the 20th century heritage industry'. But the information is markedly absent from the guidebooks and info-phones used by tourists at the site. Coming in the wake of the news that the nearby Avebury stone circle was almost totally rebuilt in the 1920s, the revelation about Stonehenge has caused embarrassment among archaelogists. English Heritage, the guardian of the monument, is to rewrite the official guide, which dismisses the Henge's recent history in a few words. Dave Batchelor, English Heritage's senior archaeologist said he would personally rewrite the official guide. 'The detail was dropped in the Sixties', he admitted. 'But times have changed and we now believe this is an important piece of the Stonehenge story and must be told'.
Cambridge University archeological archivist and leading Stonehenge author Christopher Chippindale admitted: 'Not much of what we see at Stonehenge hasn't been touched in some way'. And historical research student Brian Edwards, who recently revealed that the nearby Avebury Monument had been totally rebuilt, has found rare pictures of Stonehenge being restored. He said: 'It has been as if Stonehenge had been historically cleansed'. 'For too long people have been kept in the dark over the Stonehenge restoration work. I am astonished by how few people know about it. It is wonderful the guide book is going to tell the full story in the future.'
A million visitors a year are awe-struck as they look back in time into another age and marvel at the primitive technology and muscle-power which must have been employed transporting the huge monoliths and raising them on Salisbury Plain. They gasp as they are told about this strangely spiritual site.... mankind's first computer, its standing stones and precise lintels, lining up magically and mysteriously with the heavens above and the solstice suns.
But now, as if to head off a potential great archaeological controversy - and following interest displayed by historical researcher Brian Edwards and a local newspaper, the brochures will be re-written, to include the 'forgotten years'. The years when teams of navvies sat aboard the greatest cranes in the British Empire to hoist stones upright; drag leaning trilithons into position, replace fallen lintels which once sat atop the huge sarsens. As Mr Edwards - the erstwhile enfant terrible of British archaeology following revelations that nearby Avebury was a total 20s and 30s rebuild by marmalade millionaire Alexander Keiller - says: 'What we have been looking at is a 20th Century landscape, which is reminiscent of what Stonehenge MIGHT have been like thousands of years ago. It has been created by the heritage industry and is NOT the creation of prehistoric people. What we saw at the Millennium is less than 50 years old.'
In archaeological terms the re-writing of the guidebooks is dynamite. English Heritage run Stonehenge on behalf of the nation, and an English Heritage insider revealed: 'Dark forces were at work in the 70s, when a decision was taken to drop the information about the restorations Now that is about to change.'
The Restoration and Rebuild
The first restoration of Stonehenge was launched 100 years ago this year.
And, in 1901, as the builders went to work, The Times letters column was full of bucolic missives of complaint. But the first stage of 'restoration' thundered ahead regardless and the style guru of the day, John Ruskin, released the maxim which was to outlive him.... 'Restoration is a lie,' he stormed. Nevertheless the Stonehenge makeover was to gather momentum and more work was carried out in 1919, 1920, 1958, 1959 and 1964. Christopher Chippindale, curator at the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology and Anthropology, and author of Stonehenge Complete, admits: 'Nearly all the stones have been moved in some way and are standing in concrete.'
A stone was straightened and set in concrete in 1901, six further stones in 1919 and 1920, three more in 1959 and four in 1964. There was also the excavation of the Altar stone and re-erection of the Trilithon in 1958.
The guide book 'Stonehenge and Neighbouring Monuments' , and the audio tour of the Henge omit any comprehensive mention of the rebuilding in the 20th Century. Only on page 18 is there a slight reference...'A number of the leaning and fallen stones have been straightened and re-erected.' But even that official guide book does contain clues to the large scale restoration, which was not deemed worth a full entry.
Why does John Constable's 1835 painting of the Henge on pages 18 and 19 look so vastly different from the latter-day pristine photograph across pages 28 and 29? REASON: A lot of restoration work had taken place in between the two images being recorded. And, during long hot summers it would be possible - if one could get near to the stones - to see the turf peeling back to reveal the concrete boots into which the majority of the stones are now set. A dead give-away, but difficult to spot now as proximity to the Henge is limited.
Our pictures clearly show the rebuilding in progress. Some were discovered by Mr Chippendale and were used in a revised edition of his book. Many of those have since been lost. Others were found by Mr Edwards who unearthed guide books from the time when Stonehenge was not ashamed of its past and featured photographs and stories of the resorations.
'The news is sensational,' said Mr Edwards, a decorate student at the University of the West of England. 'Once I realised how much work had been carried out, I was amazed to discover that practically no-one outside of the henge know of its reconstruction in the last 100 years. I have always thought that if people are bothering to make a trip to Stonehenge, from home or abroad, then the least they should expect is a true story.
Everything on the internet is click bait where have you been
Thank you. @@surferxblood
They underestimate people thousands of years ago. They were way more advanced than they give them credit for.
I know I'm 2 years late on this, but THANK YOU.
It's hard to believe that learned archeologists believe that earlier civilizations wouldn't have thought of a wheel!
Because they STOLE their technology and keep it secret
Remind me to be cremated and scattered at sea. The thought of someone digging me up and fondling my bones long after I've died is somewhat disturbing.
Peps Haven me too
I'm coming for those Bones Peps (];^)~
I find the thought of being cremated and spread out to be more disturbing.
@@Gutslinger and you’ll basically turn into dirt... It would be cool to be composted and used for the benefit of plants and people eat me 😂
@@TheNuclearBolton From dust we were made, to dust we shall return.. I just prefer the thought of it being a slow process, where my remains aren't burned to ash and scattered randomly. Plants can get their nutrients from someplace else.
Should not these remains be handled with rubber gloves to protect from contaminants ??
I agreed
Its very likely fake... you make a 3D copy and use that for everything... nobody went to college i see.
@@psychoticdaizyproductions569 bruh tf is wrong with ur arrogant ass. Going to college doesnt mean u learn abt this stuff not if u studying freaking lit or film or some other shit. You wouldve thought college have taught u something abt persuasive speech and logic.
@@llamaliammm okay allow me to rephrase- nobody has common sense then. A fucking fossil is practically untouchable.
@@psychoticdaizyproductions569 r/iamverysmart
Handling bones that old with bare hands ?
D H you watch to much svu
I was wondering the same....
I would be worried about oils from her skin ruining the specimens or contaminating future DNA testing on them. She should be wearing gloves for sure.
@@MegaPerson012345 i was just thinking the same thing. She needs gloves on her filthy hands
if yyou're doing research most of the time yyyou need tactile feedback to know a couple of stuff i guess thats why people that repair old art also dont use gloves
The only thing I can be sure of is that this guy had an amazing dental plan.
Lol well they didn’t have 1,000 different candy companies and soda pop to erode their teeth at an alarming rate as today.
@@davidboinonen9613 also didn’t have toothpaste
@@camoeco3680 they might have used some natural substances to clean their teeth though
Amazing how teeth stay perfect without modern food and chemicals.
Lol... always amazes me with ancient bones... their teeth are mostly perfect
0:45 she's touching archaeological findings with bare hands. LOL
Its very likely a fake copy. So we can touch it
We cant handle fossils at all
@@psychoticdaizyproductions569 True, I doubt they would tape fragile bone pieces together the way the skull is composed.
So? Jackie McKinley is one of the UK's leading osteoarchaeologists. What's your specialty ?
That isn't actually the real thing. The first thing that is done after the specimens are cleaned up and photographed is they are recreated so they can do stuff like assemble all the pieces together. When you go to a museum those bones are not real, they are recreations of a real bone created for display, which is why they look like dirty old bones dug out of the ground and not clean and white.
It is real.. don't listen to these boobs
So it turns out that ancient humans also died and needed burying. Fascinating.
LOL yeah and they travelled, ate, slept, had children, got married, worked, traded and liked jewellery no less! Amazing, they were just like us! Hey wait a minute... you mean they were human too??? LOL
Lol
Shocking!
same shit, different wardrobe.
Egypt bruh.
This just in, guys... Ancient people could walk! Fascinating!
If only we had a time machine to solve all of our histories mysteries.
It could be because all humans originated from Europe ( white race) then turned to different races
@@lebanonchristian3951 everything has to be white
Now you've got be thinking that someone should name a TV show "History's Mysteries."
@@lebanonchristian3951 humans originated from africa
@@boneleg6952 stop lies
These skeletons were unearthed in 2002 in the town close to Stonehenge, Amesbury, about 4.5 km away. They were definitely not underneath Stonehenge. The older male is known as the Amesbury Archer.
Interesting. How do you know this?
It could be because all humans originated from Europe ( white race) then turned to different races
@@lebanonchristian3951 i have a slightly different speculation. I suspect that all currently existing human traits lead back to the same ancestors and that at as we moved to separate regions, certain genetic traits were lost to natural selection. That could be why there is a tribe of black people with naturally blonde hair.
@@MayBlake_Channel I agree. The words variety and ADAPTations are under used
@@lebanonchristian3951 lol you must be joking 🤣 😂.
In case others are interested, the bones of "The Boy with the Amber Necklace" have been carbon dated to 1,550 BC. The necklace is believed to have been forged from metals found only on the Mediterranean.
Exodus
That could cement the theory that they could have traveled in a space ship to Central Europe. And back!
Sometimes I wonder if the nephilim created Stonehenge
And built the giant colosseum and pyramids. Which would not have been so hard for 30 ft giants
@@paulaparker5597 probably, did you hear about the nephilim found in afghanistan by us soldiers on a rescue mission.
@Essag Ghim just watch this video and then you will know that it would be possible to this structure.
th-cam.com/video/vqM6NpTf3HM/w-d-xo.html
Don't be a fool and believe in such myths and theories. People believed in God's (Greek ones for example) because they had no other explanations for stuff like rain, storm, thunder and so on.
www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-apes/201801/why-do-people-believe-in-conspiracy-theories
Only because we dosn't know *exactly* how it was build doesn't mean we need to believe in Aliens or other mythical beings.
Edit: I know that I am one year too late.
@fuck google when you think that it was for no reason you are clearly not informed
Maybe their descendants.
I don't understand. You're telling me they just now found these remains? How is it that these remains have just now been found when in the early 1900s Stonehenge was actually rebuilt by the British government and archaeologists. Not many people realize but Britain actually went into the site of Stonehenge in the beginning of the 20th century and rebuilt it to as close as they thought it was at that time. As it stands now is not as it originally was when they found it. So why is it now that they are finding remains why didn't they find them then?
Chuck Finley it's not that it's fake so much as in the early 20th century around 1930 they tried to set it up in a manner consistent with what they thought it might originally look like. But how in the hell would these ass clowns have any idea what it was supposed to look like? It really is difficult and very trying to know how much of history is garbage.
Chris Fisher Thank you for bringing this up. I was going to comment on that too but was looking to see if someone already had. It is incredible to me that more people don't realise this and think that Stonehenge is in its original state.
They basically just stood the stones up, by mapping the ground and looking at the depressions in the soil with modern technology, we can see it was actually pretty close to the original. Obviously at the time they didn't know what it looked like but they got close.
If my memory serves me right, there's no burial right near the Stonehenge. Basically a circle of nothing underground it due to its supposed ritual use.
Chris Fisher I didn't know it was rebuilt :o Thanks for the info.
Ancient people also travelled a lot obviously! Do they think only modern people can travel??
They had to, actually, as staying in any one area for too long would use up it's resources.
Right?! I live in the age of the wheel and have hiked thousands of miles on foot. You don't think I'd do that if my life could be better?? I don't get the "lived and died in one place" logic.
They were Global Israelites you know !
@@briansass9106 they lived and died in the same place because they didn't have the free time like we do. They worked every day to survive. Everyone in this comment thread is biased by your own modern perception of life. Most people until semi modern times never went even 50 miles from where they were born. Sure there were traders, explorers and people in the military but they were the vast minority.
@@krebward still don't buy it. You're right that I do it for pleasure but war, famine, resources and even stories of gods have motivates countless people throughout time to migrate thousands of miles. Especially when trade came into play. I may concede to your "majority" point but MY point is that the findings shouldn't be surprising. Do you think a man learned to mine, smelt, and work gold out of ore in that same 50 mile radius?
Stone henge is having a blast this year! First the bouncy castle stone henge now this!
I didn’t know there where skeletons buried beneath Stonehenge. Always something new! So fascinating
Take a look at Naomi Etheridge's comment above.
Nomadic peoples traveled from North America to South America and then back again for trade. There are ancient trade routes to prove it. Man has always traveled for one reason or another.
I thought it was public knowledge that Stonehenge was dismantled excavated And reassembled over a 100 years ago.
Lee Johnson correct
Stonehenge is only one aspect of a very large complex. Archeologists have been digging the area for more than 15 yrs.
Lee Johnson
From 1901 to 1964, the majority of the stone circle was restored in a series of makeovers which have left it, in the words of one archaeologist, as 'a product of the 20th century heritage industry'. But the information is markedly absent from the guidebooks and info-phones used by tourists at the site. Coming in the wake of the news that the nearby Avebury stone circle was almost totally rebuilt in the 1920s, the revelation about Stonehenge has caused embarrassment among archaelogists. English Heritage, the guardian of the monument, is to rewrite the official guide, which dismisses the Henge's recent history in a few words. Dave Batchelor, English Heritage's senior archaeologist said he would personally rewrite the official guide. 'The detail was dropped in the Sixties', he admitted. 'But times have changed and we now believe this is an important piece of the Stonehenge story and must be told'.
Cambridge University archeological archivist and leading Stonehenge author Christopher Chippindale admitted: 'Not much of what we see at Stonehenge hasn't been touched in some way'. And historical research student Brian Edwards, who recently revealed that the nearby Avebury Monument had been totally rebuilt, has found rare pictures of Stonehenge being restored. He said: 'It has been as if Stonehenge had been historically cleansed'. 'For too long people have been kept in the dark over the Stonehenge restoration work. I am astonished by how few people know about it. It is wonderful the guide book is going to tell the full story in the future.'
A million visitors a year are awe-struck as they look back in time into another age and marvel at the primitive technology and muscle-power which must have been employed transporting the huge monoliths and raising them on Salisbury Plain. They gasp as they are told about this strangely spiritual site.... mankind's first computer, its standing stones and precise lintels, lining up magically and mysteriously with the heavens above and the solstice suns.
But now, as if to head off a potential great archaeological controversy - and following interest displayed by historical researcher Brian Edwards and a local newspaper, the brochures will be re-written, to include the 'forgotten years'. The years when teams of navvies sat aboard the greatest cranes in the British Empire to hoist stones upright; drag leaning trilithons into position, replace fallen lintels which once sat atop the huge sarsens. As Mr Edwards - the erstwhile enfant terrible of British archaeology following revelations that nearby Avebury was a total 20s and 30s rebuild by marmalade millionaire Alexander Keiller - says: 'What we have been looking at is a 20th Century landscape, which is reminiscent of what Stonehenge MIGHT have been like thousands of years ago. It has been created by the heritage industry and is NOT the creation of prehistoric people. What we saw at the Millennium is less than 50 years old.'
In archaeological terms the re-writing of the guidebooks is dynamite. English Heritage run Stonehenge on behalf of the nation, and an English Heritage insider revealed: 'Dark forces were at work in the 70s, when a decision was taken to drop the information about the restorations Now that is about to change.'
The Restoration and Rebuild
The first restoration of Stonehenge was launched 100 years ago this year.
And, in 1901, as the builders went to work, The Times letters column was full of bucolic missives of complaint. But the first stage of 'restoration' thundered ahead regardless and the style guru of the day, John Ruskin, released the maxim which was to outlive him.... 'Restoration is a lie,' he stormed. Nevertheless the Stonehenge makeover was to gather momentum and more work was carried out in 1919, 1920, 1958, 1959 and 1964. Christopher Chippindale, curator at the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology and Anthropology, and author of Stonehenge Complete, admits: 'Nearly all the stones have been moved in some way and are standing in concrete.'
A stone was straightened and set in concrete in 1901, six further stones in 1919 and 1920, three more in 1959 and four in 1964. There was also the excavation of the Altar stone and re-erection of the Trilithon in 1958.
The guide book 'Stonehenge and Neighbouring Monuments' , and the audio tour of the Henge omit any comprehensive mention of the rebuilding in the 20th Century. Only on page 18 is there a slight reference...'A number of the leaning and fallen stones have been straightened and re-erected.' But even that official guide book does contain clues to the large scale restoration, which was not deemed worth a full entry.
Why does John Constable's 1835 painting of the Henge on pages 18 and 19 look so vastly different from the latter-day pristine photograph across pages 28 and 29? REASON: A lot of restoration work had taken place in between the two images being recorded. And, during long hot summers it would be possible - if one could get near to the stones - to see the turf peeling back to reveal the concrete boots into which the majority of the stones are now set. A dead give-away, but difficult to spot now as proximity to the Henge is limited.
Our pictures clearly show the rebuilding in progress. Some were discovered by Mr Chippendale and were used in a revised edition of his book. Many of those have since been lost. Others were found by Mr Edwards who unearthed guide books from the time when Stonehenge was not ashamed of its past and featured photographs and stories of the resorations.
'The news is sensational,' said Mr Edwards, a decorate student at the University of the West of England. 'Once I realised how much work had been carried out, I was amazed to discover that practically no-one outside of the henge know of its reconstruction in the last 100 years. I have always thought that if people are bothering to make a trip to Stonehenge, from home or abroad, then the least they should expect is a true story.
England gosh darn did a sneak on the other countries! (Again...)
@@surferxblood bruh! When u write a comment. YOU WRITE A COMMENT.
That is an exceptional set of teeth.
Bandicoot. I looked at them several times over, now that my teeth are falling. You would think that they would pause for you to evaluate them. No, but they showed the top of the scull over and over with all that surgical tape all over it.
@@claudiosaltara8847, I was amazed at the sight of, close to prefect teeth, in an era of no awareness of dental care. I paused the area on full screen and checked it out. I'm sending this to my dentist, see what his take is. May be we ought to go to Stone Hedge, for at least a cleaning.
No proccessed sugars and high fructose corn syrup!
@@bandicoot5412 Well, I can explain this, its because we eat a lot of processed foods. If you look at remote African or American tribes the all have perfect teeth. Because they don't eat all the junk you barely have to chew.
@@bandicoot5412 One was an old man; one was a young man. I take it that these teeth were from the young man. In fact, they say as much, 'the old man next to him made the gold jewellery & he was the apprentice..'.
“I believe judging by this tiny piece of paper found the corpse the guy was a writer. He probably even wrote the Bible”
Which one?
Just a thought, Stonehenge has been found to have phenomenal acoustic properties. Maybe this male was not a talented gold worker, but one honored for his beautiful vocal skills.
Who said that the bones aren't there before the stones?
Stonehenge was built around 2500 BCE , the neolithic period. The remains are middle - late Bronze Age of 1200 BCE.
@@alanmacification The skeletons of those in the video were stated as having come there 4,500 years ago.. that would be 6500 BCE.. According to the animation, there are bones buried under Stonehenge, and they also mentioned that the wheel hadn't been discovered by pre-historic Britons.. but yet Stonehenge megalith was made.. rudimentary tools.. Something isn't right about the timeline, or this video or both..
@@alanmacification I don't understand...
@@LimiTLesSGaming9mm Stonehenge does date to c 2500 bce- well, 2300 actually based on some findings. These bones are from ppl who died 4000 years ago as they mention, around a similar time. These are not the only remains to have been found here though. Additional people from Wales were buried and the site also contains numerous instances of cremated remains.
@@ursaltydog....4000 years ago is not 6500bce in the modern western calendar
People traveled thousands of years ago. That's how Hawaii got inhabited and Australia and America. The thought that people didn't get on a boat and go places is dumb
Just Shocking. Lol
It woukd be fascinating to go back in time and experience first hand what Stone Henge was used for
ROCK concerts :P
That could cement the theory that they could have traveled in a space ship to Central Europe. And back!
They could have been visited by ancient aliens.
Shocking?nothing found under stonhenge would be shock ing.Surprised you did'nt find a dragon
Fascinating. I was lucky enough to have the opportunity to visit Stonehenge on one of my many trips to England. It's a beautiful country and incredibly rich in history. I'd urge anyone with an interest in history to visit England. Apart from Canada which is my home, England would be my choice as a place to live.
Her belief that Stonehenge was a multi-cultural hub and market makes no sense to me. If someone drops dead at the mall, those standing around don't dig a hole and bury them right there. Seems more like a place where they brought (and possibly sacrificed) people that were "outsiders". Am I right, or am I right? 🤔
That would make better sense. But keep in mind it was rebuilt there only within the last 100 years. Maybe it was built over an older sacrificial mound. We will never know the truth because they make money off the lie. And just keep adding to it to tell whatever new historical lesson they choose to make up
@@DarthakaLordvader and Jezabel-in-Hell - No, no, you have misconstrued the information above. The stones are on the original site and Stephanie Mullins has watched all the documentaries revealing the extent of the community involved with Stonehenge. There were other structures built in wood that remnants of the wood left in the ground can now tell us.
@@ClariceAust the fact is those stones have been moved. Hoisted with crains realigned set in with concrete footings. What you are looking at is as it has been call "an archaeologist conception" of what it originally looked like. In fact reconstruction of that place has been done a number of times
@@DarthakaLordvader I don't think it's that conspiratorial. The standing stones were re-erected and placed in concrete footings. the lintels were hoisted on top. Prior to this, from the angle of the remaining stones it could easily have been determined how the stones originally stood; archeologists were consulted and on site. There were two concentric circles, the outer ring with the taller stones. Lintels were on top.
@@ClariceAust the fact is they don't really know what it looked like and in the very early 1900 when they first started to move the stones around they didn't have special equipment or satellite imagery to reconstruct it. They wanted to build something to attract tourism. At that time ancient ruins all over the world were getting plundered. This site was no different. If anything it was worse because of the many reconstructions it has undergone
I find it hard to believe humans didn’t have the wheel at this time in history. They would have been made of wood so none of them would have survived. If you can make such intricate Jewlery and weapons is it really that hard to invent the wheel?
In 4000 years, they’ll find skeletons of fat people and empty Doritos bags.
A fat skeleton? 🤔
@@jeaniebird999 well, we do gain the evidence of being fat
@@psychoticdaizyproductions569
Yes, to the trained eye, the bones will show the weight they had to bear.
jeaniebird : lol 😄
Imagine looking like Pennywise next to a dude that never brushed a day in his life.
So how come they didnt find the remains when Stonehenge was disassembled in the early 19 hundreds and reassembled hush hush style?
"Thats is not my job" said guys that dissamble that stone 😂
Novel Nouvel that’s probably more accurate then you think
@@novelnouvel 😂😂😂
New sonar technology
I WAS WONDERING THE SAME THING...; INTERESTING THEY DIDNT FIND THEM...
The first shopping mall, interesting theory. :D
I’m really curious to see if we will ever discover the true secret and story behind Stonehenge . Beautiful place, been there beforem
Did you feel any special energy? I'm asking this because it is known as being one of the vortexes of high frequency energy magnetic field on planet Earth.
I recently watched a documentary on YT about young women circa this era making long journeys usually by themselves around Europe. They were welcome wherever they went. It was hypothesized that they might have been healers. Utterly fascinating.
i love history !
imagine researching something you know nothing about then handle human remains with bare hands lol
Contaminated now.
Always interesting
Absolutely amazing science! What an awesome time we live in. Too bad, there so many people that only watch reality ish television.
City of the Dead. Not surprising. This isn't "blowing up history". We've known this for decades now.
Stone was usually reserved for the dead. Wood for the living (Woodhenge is nearby). This is why we use gravestones to this day. I remember when they found all this out. This must be an older documentary.
Yes... But what did the neurones inside the bones think ? !
The architectural Stonehenge feat is a local public testimony of greater Knowlege. ... but there's more in the minds of the conceptors the the eye meets !
The Arkaim - Göbekli Tepe (Karatepe) - Pommelte Triangle and surprising Vatican connection reveal incredible et absolutely precise distance relationships with one another, bearing GPS precision. But the Vatican - Stonehege, even more !
Not only do the measurements but underlying coherence, and Golden mathematical logic binds all the elements into a mind boggling scenario, concluding on an implicit continent wide pentagon figure.
This is one of many such untold wonders, characterized by its geometry, magic, precision and underlying meaning.
If however, sound arithmetic is not your cup of tea, try nonetheless a venture beyond the geometry and discover... the magic, precision and underlying meaning of this triangle and associated logic.
And the question is : Who, when, how and why ?
th-cam.com/video/0XWCjMq8YiE/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/play/PLRL9KpTd4hssr370Kb3npnr7nA-Zraq7O.html
How are human remains shocking? They are all over the planet. Or is the revelation shocking? Then put a full stop after the word ‘shocking’.
From 1901 to 1964, the majority of the stone circle was restored in a series of makeovers which have left it, in the words of one archaeologist, as 'a product of the 20th century heritage industry'. But the information is markedly absent from the guidebooks and info-phones used by tourists at the site. Coming in the wake of the news that the nearby Avebury stone circle was almost totally rebuilt in the 1920s, the revelation about Stonehenge has caused embarrassment among archaelogists. English Heritage, the guardian of the monument, is to rewrite the official guide, which dismisses the Henge's recent history in a few words. Dave Batchelor, English Heritage's senior archaeologist said he would personally rewrite the official guide. 'The detail was dropped in the Sixties', he admitted. 'But times have changed and we now believe this is an important piece of the Stonehenge story and must be told'.
Cambridge University archeological archivist and leading Stonehenge author Christopher Chippindale admitted: 'Not much of what we see at Stonehenge hasn't been touched in some way'. And historical research student Brian Edwards, who recently revealed that the nearby Avebury Monument had been totally rebuilt, has found rare pictures of Stonehenge being restored. He said: 'It has been as if Stonehenge had been historically cleansed'. 'For too long people have been kept in the dark over the Stonehenge restoration work. I am astonished by how few people know about it. It is wonderful the guide book is going to tell the full story in the future.'
A million visitors a year are awe-struck as they look back in time into another age and marvel at the primitive technology and muscle-power which must have been employed transporting the huge monoliths and raising them on Salisbury Plain. They gasp as they are told about this strangely spiritual site.... mankind's first computer, its standing stones and precise lintels, lining up magically and mysteriously with the heavens above and the solstice suns.
But now, as if to head off a potential great archaeological controversy - and following interest displayed by historical researcher Brian Edwards and a local newspaper, the brochures will be re-written, to include the 'forgotten years'. The years when teams of navvies sat aboard the greatest cranes in the British Empire to hoist stones upright; drag leaning trilithons into position, replace fallen lintels which once sat atop the huge sarsens. As Mr Edwards - the erstwhile enfant terrible of British archaeology following revelations that nearby Avebury was a total 20s and 30s rebuild by marmalade millionaire Alexander Keiller - says: 'What we have been looking at is a 20th Century landscape, which is reminiscent of what Stonehenge MIGHT have been like thousands of years ago. It has been created by the heritage industry and is NOT the creation of prehistoric people. What we saw at the Millennium is less than 50 years old.'
In archaeological terms the re-writing of the guidebooks is dynamite. English Heritage run Stonehenge on behalf of the nation, and an English Heritage insider revealed: 'Dark forces were at work in the 70s, when a decision was taken to drop the information about the restorations Now that is about to change.'
The Restoration and Rebuild
The first restoration of Stonehenge was launched 100 years ago this year.
And, in 1901, as the builders went to work, The Times letters column was full of bucolic missives of complaint. But the first stage of 'restoration' thundered ahead regardless and the style guru of the day, John Ruskin, released the maxim which was to outlive him.... 'Restoration is a lie,' he stormed. Nevertheless the Stonehenge makeover was to gather momentum and more work was carried out in 1919, 1920, 1958, 1959 and 1964. Christopher Chippindale, curator at the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology and Anthropology, and author of Stonehenge Complete, admits: 'Nearly all the stones have been moved in some way and are standing in concrete.'
A stone was straightened and set in concrete in 1901, six further stones in 1919 and 1920, three more in 1959 and four in 1964. There was also the excavation of the Altar stone and re-erection of the Trilithon in 1958.
The guide book 'Stonehenge and Neighbouring Monuments' , and the audio tour of the Henge omit any comprehensive mention of the rebuilding in the 20th Century. Only on page 18 is there a slight reference...'A number of the leaning and fallen stones have been straightened and re-erected.' But even that official guide book does contain clues to the large scale restoration, which was not deemed worth a full entry.
Why does John Constable's 1835 painting of the Henge on pages 18 and 19 look so vastly different from the latter-day pristine photograph across pages 28 and 29? REASON: A lot of restoration work had taken place in between the two images being recorded. And, during long hot summers it would be possible - if one could get near to the stones - to see the turf peeling back to reveal the concrete boots into which the majority of the stones are now set. A dead give-away, but difficult to spot now as proximity to the Henge is limited.
Our pictures clearly show the rebuilding in progress. Some were discovered by Mr Chippendale and were used in a revised edition of his book. Many of those have since been lost. Others were found by Mr Edwards who unearthed guide books from the time when Stonehenge was not ashamed of its past and featured photographs and stories of the resorations.
'The news is sensational,' said Mr Edwards, a decorate student at the University of the West of England. 'Once I realised how much work had been carried out, I was amazed to discover that practically no-one outside of the henge know of its reconstruction in the last 100 years. I have always thought that if people are bothering to make a trip to Stonehenge, from home or abroad, then the least they should expect is a true story.'
Thank you very much for information
Skeleton has had enough of ghost and it’s grief, wanting only to rest in the dark eternal sleep.
The earth is a graveyard.
Guys those are not real bones they're replicas, which is why she showed the picture of the real one on the laptop.
(edit: well after further debate I believe I may have been incorrect and they may in fact be real bones) Never be Afraid to Change your Mind!
Good to see Jackie.
Presented per usual with melodrama, intrigue and thunderous score. History programmes need a new formula.
The woman is clueless. The ancients were working metals gold etc for thousands of years. Just look at Ireland.
Would you care to site a source for that claim?
When did she say anything to the contrary? They've been there for 4500 years.
@@yamiyomizuki One example.
LIMERICK
Ancient mining and smelting equipment and materials was uncovered in a bog near the popular Irish city.
Thought to be several thousand years old and sizeable in scale, the discovery prompted speculation that there could be more gold hidden in the region.
www.irishpost.com/life-style/do-you-live-near-one-of-irelands-hidden-gold-hotspots-150649
I think someone is jealous..
@@thegroove2000 Still haven't proven her wrong... "several thousand years old" meaning ~3000+ years. Again, they're 4500 years old.
Some far off time will come when someone discovers our primitive grave yards and think what could this be? People dressed up in boxes, and nobody gets the same clothes, cause of death, or even the same casket. Some are even cremated and placed in urns in grave sites. It's all how someone interprets and perceives the situation.
Hope dontmope Holy Moly, I’ve been thinking the same thing for several years now! Some future archeologists are going to score big on Aretha Franklins casket! Also what will they think of the coffin sizes of the morbidly obese? Will the skeletal remains somehow reveal that a person was obese? Cosmetic Implants! They’ll find implants in the coffins. That’ll be a head scratcher for sure!
The thumbnail made this look like an old kitchen nighmares clip and I was *really* very confused when I read the title
I feel SHOCKED i tell you! Shocked! lol
LMFAO LOL
SPLAT!
Of course it's expected that a rock would squashed someone - duh!
ITS PERFECT JUST THE WAY IT IS !!!!!!!
That laptop looks bloody new too me!!! Experts come out.... ;-)
wow i'm so shocked people travelled before the invention of the wheel
Given how long we've been here there's probably bones underneath all of our feet. 👍
But what did the bones think ? !
The architectural Stonehenge feat is a local public testimony of greater Knowlege. ... but there's more in the minds of the conceptors the the eye meets !
The Arkaim - Göbekli Tepe (Karatepe) - Pommelte Triangle and surprising Vatican connection reveal incredible et absolutely precise distance relationships with one another, bearing GPS precision. But the Vatican - Stonehege, even more !
Not only do the measurements but underlying coherence, and Golden mathematical logic binds all the elements into a mind boggling scenario, concluding on an implicit continent wide pentagon figure.
This is one of many such untold wonders, characterized by its geometry, magic, precision and underlying meaning.
If however, sound arithmetic is not your cup of tea, try nonetheless a venture beyond the geometry and discover... the magic, precision and underlying meaning of this triangle and associated logic.
And the question is : Who, when, how and why ?
th-cam.com/video/0XWCjMq8YiE/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/play/PLRL9KpTd4hssr370Kb3npnr7nA-Zraq7O.html
How long have we been here?
What about the other 2 skeletons? Do those contradict the findings, or is there another reason that they weren't described at all?
Thank you.
Stonehenge was originally built in Pembrokeshire, Wales, before it was taken apart and transported some 180 miles to Wiltshire, England.
She is basically retired Nico Robin.
Looks like Brook is with her, too
😂
It was a sacrificial altar.
Doesnt solve how we made it. Also, its a celestial map, so what did space have to do with the sacrifices.
Mike Rodriguez Aliens, or advanced beings, probably arrived and made the monument. The Humana then made pagan sacrifices in attempts to summon/appease these "gods".
@@Americansikkunt agreed. Case closed
Mike Rodriguez shite! go search on here about the guy building his own stonehenge! romans used concrete yet it wasn’t til recently that we (modern humans) tried to recreate it. the recipe was lost to us for a long time. the same goes for a lot of other things.
th-cam.com/video/-K7q20VzwVs/w-d-xo.html
saying ‘it’s got to be aliens’ is incredibly ignorant of how smart they actually were.
and to say that pagan worship gods = really they’re aliens is as stupid as you can get. the current cult religions are no different, they still worship the sky daddy’s only now, they were monotheistic not polytheistic. different things are sacrificed though to the new aliens huh?
The Brits like to ignore the signs of cannibalism.
Jackie is a professional. I saw her perform extraordinary excavations during her appearances with Time Team. It would be a honor to work with and learn from a professor with her knowledge and skills...and if I recall she has a very appealing, charming and humorous side to her.....not just all business. Much like Dr. Lucy Worsley. Wonderful ladies.
The skeleton: “Hey, get off of me!”
all the debate about Brexit and migrants and suddenly this video appears????
This is not the first video about British multi culture so no, it means nothing.
Guys... its a 3D model of the skeleton so she can actually work with it, and touch it... stay in school kids.
@@llamaliammm kiss meh
Actually this would be the real skeleton and since it was found already contaminated buried in the ground, they are not looking for anything to test specifically in the bones. They can be touched and some may choose to use gloves but it is not necessary. ‘Stay in school kids’, could say that for you.
@@stephsmanicshenanigans8017 thanks maybe with patience ill be on your level Mam
Mike Rodriguez good luck! I’m obsessed with learning so you’re going to have to be on top of it
@@stephsmanicshenanigans8017 Dont worry i brought a ladder.
The giants looking at us like
“Why are they praying to our broken chairs ?”
The Gerber baby food commercial at the beginning of this video highlighted a farm in the San Luis Valley, Colorado. I lived in the valley for many years, graduated high school there, and my daughter was born there. Too cool! (Not sure if everyone sees the same commercials in videos.)
I live there now! Small world!!
@@neverforget3520 Very cool! I attended school in Fort Garland. ☺️
Okay, confused, Click-bait ?? The Narrator continually indicates that there are bodies buried under the stones, Animations as well. BUT the Archaeologist never mentions such thing ... In the case of Each body and grave she discussed was found in The Region, or nearby. But NEVER did she discuss and bodies found under Stonehenge.
1:20 in is where they say under
The title said ... beneath stonehenge
There was a documentary on the bodies of stonehenge back in 2010 or '11 i think? It aired on Channel 4 and they discussed the finding of bodies within and around at specific points of the henge, if that helps? The team also try to replicate the moving of a single stone and the possibility that the river was diverted to flow from the stone henge to the wood henge about 3 miles or something away from stoneboi. I think it had Tony Robinson and his time team investigate. I honestly only vaguely remember it, but if you're interested in the bodies underneath,why and how the henge came to b; look it up! It's gotta be somewhere on TH-cam or Google at least. ☺
@@Zoe-Zaliae I vaguely remember that too!
I don't know why scientists are so shocked when they find out ancient people do the exact same things we do. Like travel for instants. Were they not the same type of human? We haven't change in a couple hundred thousand years.
Wait, didn't they "fix" up Stonehenge before it was a tourist attraction?
I Just realized they could have moved some important details that may help solve this case
So, tell us, how did you obtain permits to disturb the historical site and what premise you claimed.
Stonehenge is overrated imho. Leedskalin made an entire rock musuem, dismantled it, and then moved the stones just so he can reassemble it by himself. Oh wow people knew about the solar system put up a few rocks.
Why is she handling those bones without gloves on?
Why shouldn't she?
Not all ancient organic items require gloves.
Where is the rest of the show?
These guys certainly got about.
These results challenge what we think we know about the habits of our ancient relatives.
I find it puzzling that they don't think humans would migrate at all, literally a large majority of animals migrate every year; humans back then didn't have to rely on having enough money for a plane ticket, they'd just walk.
Some people died in the vicinity and were either buried or cremated. Who would have thought it. Shocking!
So after all these hundreds of years it turns out Stonehenge was just a burial ground.
I can't find any articles on the two skeletons with gold near their jaws. Anyone have links?
We’re the only animal that buries the dead. It was a cultural trait picked up thousands of years ago. I guess this could be considered shocking
Elephants bury their dead
Did you just assume the gender of those skeletons?!
Paleontologists are able to tell the gender of old bones. (It may be from the mitochondrial pattern of the remains; I'm not quite sure.) Also, the pelvis would be different from males and females; that little thing called excruciating childbirth.
@@ClariceAust lol. I completely understand that, I have a masters degree in epidemiology. You can tell the gender of a person from just one cell. I'm just being sarcastic because today in America, some people think they can change their gender and that we shouldn't assume their gender, rather we should ask what pronouns they prefer.
@@alaatakache2212 In that case, lucky for yourself and your colleagues that things were more straightforward in times now past; makes your job much easier? :)
Just goes to show how much we really don’t know ancient people where so much more developed and connected than we think
The greater hinge and other hinges across the UK have many burial sites. Besides religious uses, sacrafice and burial were a tradition to the ancient people who used the hinges
Burials or Murdered? Also, Stonehenge is missing some stones.
@L C. Different ages and both buried next to each other. Suppose they could have been marked graves and buried years apart. Maybe they were important people and just had the same metalwork rather than the makers of the gold. If they have sacrificial wounds then guess it was murder. They have lots of sacrificed bog bodies in Ireland from around this time. Archaeologists make some right crap up though, half the time they don’t know anymore than us and it’s mere speculation, especially around these eras.
Stonehenge was a portal to another world/dimension.
I like this theory more, it's more fun.
They're just discovering humans apparently migrate just like every single animal on Earth regardless of technology, so it's gonna take awhile to get them to hypothesis interdimensional portals.
Eh... only in Dave Duncan's the Great Game. You have to do a jig in the nude for it to work properly....
Stonehenge has been rebuilt during the 20 century some stones realigned and set in concrete.
Jackie, the Amesbury Archer dig had the same gold items like what was in the mouth, but they were listed as hair ornaments or earrings.??
Can we have something more Scientific? This is child's play.
ruman hemains
Take care and God loves you.
I will fart for your sins.
So strange.
I was gonna make a skeleton joke but i didn’t have the back bone for it.
I don't know much but I know that everybody farts and that says enough
The one who
smelt it delt it......
"DOORKNOB!"
De paus van de Lilith Kerk, if those scientists had such down to earth intelligence they wouldn’t have job.
My only problem with this discovery is you have to ta
mper with Stonehenge in order to find fossils understone here. You guys do it, saying it's for science, but the truth is sometimes. Somethings just need to be let left alone. I figured sooner or later, someone would try to tear it apart to try to figure it out. That's the whole part of history, leaving it intact. trucks and things like that. Tearing up the ground.digging,not good.
james drayton Why leave it alone when there’s new things to be learned
RIGHT!! !PEOPLE JUST INVADE SACRED SHIT THAT THEY HAVE NO RIGHT DISTURBING IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE OR NOT.
Archaeologists are selfish. Very very selfish.
They should stop digging graves, and leave them for the future generations to discover.
There are after all only a finite number of sites to be discovered. And coming generations should also be allowed to relish in the feeling of discovery.
براہمداغ Then what if the coming generation discovers every unknown archeological sites? What then? Should they also be condemned for not leaving any more sites for the next generation that comes after them? That’s the most flawed argument against archeology I have ever heard. Archeology is done for the sake of knowledge, not for the thrill of being the one to discover something. That’s an incredibly dumb and selfish conclusion.
Stonehenge has already been tampered with, cause the way it stands is not how it originally was. Think it was in the 70s, SH was moved. Theres pictures of this happening.
This is very, very, very interesting. I think we are just beginning to get a glimpse of the history that surrounded Stonehenge.
Looks like turns out that the mistery of stonehenge is no more than a memorial site. 😁