And it’s a forever tear - it can’t be fixed. Even if they “say” they worked it out, there’s always going to be that one proverbial pot on the stove that bubbles to the top forever - it never runs dry, it never runs low and it never gets shut off. It’ll be there until everyone involved has gone to their grave.
I don’t know - my wife is one of six daughters, and when their mother went to the nursing home my wife was the only one of them who went to see her even though they all lived with 15 miles of the nursing home, my wife was the only one who was still working and my wife was the only one who still had young kids at home. My wife feels like they all just dumped it on her lap. I really think it depends on the situation and the family dynamics.
The stock was in her grandfather’s name not her father. That’s the point. Her father’s estate only included HIS share of the stock. I think that’s why JJ is asking her these questions as to what made her feel entitled to ALL of this money. .
@@PartyOf8PleaseMy mom was in a similar situation with my grandma although she had some of her siblings also living in town. It got to the point my grandma couldn’t be left alone, and my mom had a full time job. I was driving in from two hours out of town whenever I was off work to sit with my grandma while my mom’s brothers and sister were not helping. But then my uncle’s wife had the nerve to blame my mom when my grandmother passed because she was there with her but unable to revive her.
@anndeecosita3586 technically they can't prove if the stocks are in the grandfathers name or her father's name as they had the same name and didn't have middle name or junior on the stocks so at that point it would be up to the judge
These lines of questioning are funny but I feel the daughter has the right to the money if it was in her father's name regardless of how she got along with him. That's the law in their state. So it's a lesson to us all. Have a will so as to be able to dictate the distribution of your life 'sweats' when you're gone.
Here’s another good rule: Don’t try to save it all for your kids. You shouldn’t waste your money, but you shouldn’t live like you don’t have a dime to your name, either. Unless you really don’t have a dime to your name.
@@PartyOf8Please Yea, it happens to us all lmao. I've had to delete a comment or even unlike a comment before as well. That's what happens when the case is uploaded in parts. I hope you had a wonderful New Years celebration:).
if the stocks were the grandfather's stocks, why weren't they divided between his children when he died in 1975? why didn't they come up until the son died? maybe the next part will answer
According to the testimony the attorney the family hired missed it while accounting for his estate. If granddaddy died in the 70s it should not be difficult to look at when the stock and purchased and make an educated decision on who bought it.
It's not hers. The stocks were the grandfathers. All my stocks, credit cards, lines of credit, have my First Middle and Last name on them as per my birth certificate. As did my dads when he passed, and as my brother does. If the stocks were her fathers they would have included his middle name. The plaintiff's father had no middle name the same as the stocks.
If you’re naive enough to think its that cut and dry, you may want to research what a “living trust” is, lest you want to state to claim all your assets when you die lol
@DIDYOUSEETHAT172 how did the defendants father get the stocks ? There is no way she would be able to get that info without him giving it to his daughter no? If the stocks were passed on to the son wouldn't it go to the daughter if he had no will?
@@G0dismabestfrenWhere did you get that the defendant’s daughter got the information from him? He didn’t. She said she was contacted by an attorney or company or whatever after her father died. Instead of clarifying whether this was in her father’s name or her grandfather’s, she took the full value instead of only taking what would have been her father’s portion. Granddaddy didn’t have a will either.
My wife always says "work and get your own stuff, so that when relatives die, you don't bother anyone, and no one bothers you about a deceased person's stuff that THEY worked for." 🤞🏾 Families tear each other apart for someone else's things.. 🇿🇦 Johannesburg, South Africa
My brother did nothing to help with our parents.... during their life, and with the house once they had both passed. They were 46 and 52 when they adopted me. My brother was 9 years older. He move out and I took care of them in their home. Painted, did the yard work, took them to appointments when they couldn't drive, made sure they got to church functions. When I married, I took care of them. After my father passed, my mother was in her home alone until she broke her hip. She then came to live with me and my second husband. We took care of her until she passed away. My parents were always adamant that everything would be split 50/50 between my brother and I. I made sure that happened. He is still bitter that his natural parents gave him up for adoption, even though our parents gave us the best life ever. Sad.
The question in this case is not whether the daughter or the aunts should inherit the father's stocks, the question being asked in this case is whether the stocks belonged to the father or the grandfather. It appears that the stocks belonged to the grandfather and therefore should have been a part of the aunts/father's inheritance (it should have been split amongst them). The third party that was holding onto the stock contacted the daughter about the stocks since the father and grandfather shared the same name, but that doesn't mean the stocks belonged solely to the father. I don't think the aunts are being greedy. If the stocks are a part of the grandfather's original inheritance then they are entitled to it.
Thank you. It seems like a lot of people are not connecting the dots and saying “it was in her dad’s name so she gets it”. The aunts are saying the stock belonged to THEIR father not hers therefore she would legally only be entitled to her father’s share what was inherited from grandpa. So if they are greedy for suing she has to be also for acceptance of the full amount.
@@anndeecosita3586that's a false equivalence to say that the daughter is greedy for accepting what may be her portion. The aunts already received a potential first part to begin with. Now they want to go after the daughter for her portion too.
Ridiculous aunts. The money doesn't go sideways. You already got your cut when your father passed. Why are you now trying to get more???????? Shameful aunts.
You got a bad selfish daughter who legally wil most probably be getting the money while the aunt that looked after him gets nothing. The aunt looked after him for 3 years when he had dementia but when you're diagnozed it's usually too late to do a valid will, emphasis on valid.
I'm sure the aunt cleaned out his home since she was there (according to her) and sold it everything, stuffing her own pockets. Even if the house was "torn down", the property still had value, however minor. Where are the proceeds from that?
@@broeheemed32 In the 3rd ep we're told he was an addict for 10 years prior. For a house to be torn down it has to be really, really bad. I very much doubt he had anything of value left, being an addict he probably sold off whateber item he may have had if any in that kind of environment, probably unkempt too. So I disagree with the stuffing of pockets statement. I don't see what he could have had of value there. However I'm surprised JJ didn't ask about the land where the house stood.
I hate these cases I’m glad I only have 2 brothers and I know we won’t be fighting each other over who gets what and how much.. The defendant shouldn’t even be here it’s amazing how money gets people motivated to get off their ass and put their hands out for their cut.
The aunts are claiming the stock was in THEIR father’s name not the defendant’s father’s name. If that’s the case the defendant isn’t legally entitled to all of this money. Just her father’s share but she took it ALL.
You're doing a fantastic job! Just a quick off-topic question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
If the Defendants father had dementia for his last three years of his life, he was likely in a nursing home that Medicaid paid for. If the state had been aware he had stock, he would’ve been required to cash it out and pay for two months of his care. This was a small windfall for his daughter.
JJ going off her rocker a little on this one. The documents show the defendant's father owned the stock. She's the only living heir. No will. Case closed.
You didn't care for your dad when he was alive, but u care for his money when he died. She doesn't deserve a penny if for 3 years she could not visit him even 1ce. She deserves nothing
People can have early onset dementia. Alzheimer’s is a type of dementia but not all dementia are classified as Alzheimer’s. Dementia is an umbrella term. My aunt has frontotemporal dementia. Her friends constantly say she has Alzheimer’s. She does not. I correct them and explain that she was tested for Alzheimer’s. That is not what she has.
Interesting logic that I don’t agree with, if I cared for my sibling in our older years, I wouldn’t expect a cent for that from their inheritance, I would do it out of love and expect nothing in return. I would want their children to receive what’s rightfully theirs. Greedy people.
I think the Aunt Judith should receive the money as she was the ONLY one who took care of him during the time he was sick. The aunt that saw him 5 times doesn't deserve anything and the daughter doesn't either, i don't care that she is his daughter. She didn't even know his age when he died, she didn't see her father when he was sick, she tried to initially paint him out to being difficult to make herself look good and then changed her tuned. The daughter never took care of her sick father but she wants his money. People are here are disgusting.
I see the point but daughter seems greedy but I wouldn’t hunt her down about it. The aunts look very well put together and I’m sure they don’t need it.
As you probably already know, they explain a potential reason in the next episode. ;) My first thought was alcohol. Wernicke-Korsakoff, but they didn't specify to which addiction he was afflicted.
Early onset dementia at 56 yrs old... God bless his heart.....😢😢😢😢😢
At 53, he died at 56
That's what I said ....she said 3 years so he was 53 when he was diagnosed....that's so sad...
My great uncle had advanced dementia in his early 50s we don’t know what happened or caused it. Unfortunately he wasn’t living with us or family
I was thinking the same thing 😢
Seeing a family tear each other apart over a deceased relative is so sad
And it’s a forever tear - it can’t be fixed. Even if they “say” they worked it out, there’s always going to be that one proverbial pot on the stove that bubbles to the top forever - it never runs dry, it never runs low and it never gets shut off. It’ll be there until everyone involved has gone to their grave.
It's over money not the relative
Over not a significant amount of money! Have siblings is not always a blessing
They don't get along anyway, this is not tearing anything apart l they weren't close for many years at this point
@@reewang7271 your idea of a significant amount of money is different than my idea of a significant amount of money.
She’s his only daughter. The money goes to her , regardless of how many times she visited him
Who cares who visited him, doesn't mean the aunts deserve his inheritance. If he wanted to leave his estate to them he shoulve had a will
The daughter could face time him every day. I agree the visiting him aspect is irrelevant
I don’t know - my wife is one of six daughters, and when their mother went to the nursing home my wife was the only one of them who went to see her even though they all lived with 15 miles of the nursing home, my wife was the only one who was still working and my wife was the only one who still had young kids at home. My wife feels like they all just dumped it on her lap.
I really think it depends on the situation and the family dynamics.
The stock was in her grandfather’s name not her father. That’s the point. Her father’s estate only included HIS share of the stock. I think that’s why JJ is asking her these questions as to what made her feel entitled to ALL of this money. .
@@PartyOf8PleaseMy mom was in a similar situation with my grandma although she had some of her siblings also living in town. It got to the point my grandma couldn’t be left alone, and my mom had a full time job. I was driving in from two hours out of town whenever I was off work to sit with my grandma while my mom’s brothers and sister were not helping. But then my uncle’s wife had the nerve to blame my mom when my grandmother passed because she was there with her but unable to revive her.
@anndeecosita3586 technically they can't prove if the stocks are in the grandfathers name or her father's name as they had the same name and didn't have middle name or junior on the stocks so at that point it would be up to the judge
These lines of questioning are funny but I feel the daughter has the right to the money if it was in her father's name regardless of how she got along with him. That's the law in their state. So it's a lesson to us all. Have a will so as to be able to dictate the distribution of your life 'sweats' when you're gone.
Here’s another good rule: Don’t try to save it all for your kids. You shouldn’t waste your money, but you shouldn’t live like you don’t have a dime to your name, either. Unless you really don’t have a dime to your name.
It wasn’t in her father’s name. It was in her grandfather’s name.
@@anndeecosita3586technically it wasn't in either man's full name.
Just because they visited him when he was in a home, doesn't mean they're entitled to anything.
right
I think she was putting the story together so she understood what was going on
The aunts are just greedy.
They took care of him. I don’t blame them! Taking care of a person with dementia is not easy!
@@PartyOf8Pleasehow is it all 3? The daughter, defendant had a right here.
@@PartyOf8Please No problem!
@
I posted before I heard the whole story. Whoops!
@@PartyOf8Please Yea, it happens to us all lmao. I've had to delete a comment or even unlike a comment before as well. That's what happens when the case is uploaded in parts. I hope you had a wonderful New Years celebration:).
if the stocks were the grandfather's stocks, why weren't they divided between his children when he died in 1975? why didn't they come up until the son died? maybe the next part will answer
Right? We’ve not heard something … let’s hope it’s coming!
According to the testimony the attorney the family hired missed it while accounting for his estate. If granddaddy died in the 70s it should not be difficult to look at when the stock and purchased and make an educated decision on who bought it.
@@anndeecosita3586you’re absolutely correct.
She’s the daughter she gets the money. This line of questioning is ridiculous.
Oh get over it! It makes for good tv!
It's not hers. The stocks were the grandfathers. All my stocks, credit cards, lines of credit, have my First Middle and Last name on them as per my birth certificate. As did my dads when he passed, and as my brother does. If the stocks were her fathers they would have included his middle name. The plaintiff's father had no middle name the same as the stocks.
If you’re naive enough to think its that cut and dry, you may want to research what a “living trust” is, lest you want to state to claim all your assets when you die lol
@DIDYOUSEETHAT172 how did the defendants father get the stocks ? There is no way she would be able to get that info without him giving it to his daughter no? If the stocks were passed on to the son wouldn't it go to the daughter if he had no will?
@@G0dismabestfrenWhere did you get that the defendant’s daughter got the information from him? He didn’t. She said she was contacted by an attorney or company or whatever after her father died. Instead of clarifying whether this was in her father’s name or her grandfather’s, she took the full value instead of only taking what would have been her father’s portion. Granddaddy didn’t have a will either.
“Maybe!” 😂😂
Maybe…is such a good cliff hanger 😂😂
56 is far too young to pass away and to experience dementia in his early 50's is awful.
My wife always says "work and get your own stuff, so that when relatives die, you don't bother anyone, and no one bothers you about a deceased person's stuff that THEY worked for." 🤞🏾
Families tear each other apart for someone else's things..
🇿🇦 Johannesburg, South Africa
My brother did nothing to help with our parents.... during their life, and with the house once they had both passed. They were 46 and 52 when they adopted me. My brother was 9 years older. He move out and I took care of them in their home. Painted, did the yard work, took them to appointments when they couldn't drive, made sure they got to church functions. When I married, I took care of them. After my father passed, my mother was in her home alone until she broke her hip. She then came to live with me and my second husband. We took care of her until she passed away. My parents were always adamant that everything would be split 50/50 between my brother and I. I made sure that happened. He is still bitter that his natural parents gave him up for adoption, even though our parents gave us the best life ever. Sad.
The question in this case is not whether the daughter or the aunts should inherit the father's stocks, the question being asked in this case is whether the stocks belonged to the father or the grandfather. It appears that the stocks belonged to the grandfather and therefore should have been a part of the aunts/father's inheritance (it should have been split amongst them). The third party that was holding onto the stock contacted the daughter about the stocks since the father and grandfather shared the same name, but that doesn't mean the stocks belonged solely to the father. I don't think the aunts are being greedy. If the stocks are a part of the grandfather's original inheritance then they are entitled to it.
Thank you. It seems like a lot of people are not connecting the dots and saying “it was in her dad’s name so she gets it”. The aunts are saying the stock belonged to THEIR father not hers therefore she would legally only be entitled to her father’s share what was inherited from grandpa. So if they are greedy for suing she has to be also for acceptance of the full amount.
@@anndeecosita3586that's a false equivalence to say that the daughter is greedy for accepting what may be her portion. The aunts already received a potential first part to begin with. Now they want to go after the daughter for her portion too.
Dementia at 56 that is so sad, he was so young
What strange questions from Judge Judy!
The defendant doesn’t have to answer these personal questions
You don’t answer the questions being presented to you, then you can kiss the case goodbye.
Oh but she does. JJ decides what’s relevant and what’s not.
Over $10,000…ridiculous.
Judge Judy kind of have a point if everybody got $10,000 when everybody's daddy died then why is they mad at her cuz she got $10 I don't understand
Oh wow she said maybe. LOL, The defendant about to be ticked off in the next part
I wonder how the plaintiffs would feel if upon either’s death their sibling fought their children for money?
Ridiculous aunts. The money doesn't go sideways. You already got your cut when your father passed. Why are you now trying to get more???????? Shameful aunts.
This is friggin awful. Your family member passes and all you care about is what he’s done with his money. God I hate humanity.
Look at that sarcastic look on her face
Fighting over pennies is crazy work 😑
That's why wills are so important
You got a bad selfish daughter who legally wil most probably be getting the money while the aunt that looked after him gets nothing. The aunt looked after him for 3 years when he had dementia but when you're diagnozed it's usually too late to do a valid will, emphasis on valid.
Doesn’t mean she deserved the money. Daughter could just as well have face timed him daily but who knows
I'm sure the aunt cleaned out his home since she was there (according to her) and sold it everything, stuffing her own pockets. Even if the house was "torn down", the property still had value, however minor. Where are the proceeds from that?
Exactly
@@broeheemed32 In the 3rd ep we're told he was an addict for 10 years prior. For a house to be torn down it has to be really, really bad. I very much doubt he had anything of value left, being an addict he probably sold off whateber item he may have had if any in that kind of environment, probably unkempt too. So I disagree with the stuffing of pockets statement. I don't see what he could have had of value there. However I'm surprised JJ didn't ask about the land where the house stood.
This case is TEDIUS
She actually looks good for 46
What is wrong with the aunts. That money goes to his dayghter! Not them.
I hate these cases I’m glad I only have 2 brothers and I know we won’t be fighting each other over who gets what and how much..
The defendant shouldn’t even be here it’s amazing how money gets people motivated to get off their ass and put their hands out for their cut.
She looks great for 46
Imagine having to deal with the defendant's attitude day and night. Gross.
The aunts are claiming the stock was in THEIR father’s name not the defendant’s father’s name. If that’s the case the defendant isn’t legally entitled to all of this money. Just her father’s share but she took it ALL.
Petty Aunts. Let her have her dad's stock. Seriously
The stock belonged to the AUNTS dad. NOT the nieces dad.
Leave the girl alone!!! SMH
You're doing a fantastic job! Just a quick off-topic question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
If the Defendants father had dementia for his last three years of his life, he was likely in a nursing home that Medicaid paid for. If the state had been aware he had stock, he would’ve been required to cash it out and pay for two months of his care. This was a small windfall for his daughter.
Sad case
Very. This time of year really hits it home.
Why people always fighting over deaf left😢 this woman did not even care about her father.
Here we go 🚶♀️
😂😂😂
JJ going off her rocker a little on this one. The documents show the defendant's father owned the stock. She's the only living heir. No will. Case closed.
The niece looks like her aunt
You didn't care for your dad when he was alive, but u care for his money when he died. She doesn't deserve a penny if for 3 years she could not visit him even 1ce. She deserves nothing
So the stocks are the grandfather’s stock. It should be split three ways.
Those two plaintiffs are clearly money hungry and that's all they care about
My guess is she wants a share of the estate to support her 18 year old daughter who already has her own child. My goodness.
Are you a lawyer? Judge judy knows what she was doing better.
@@tessparel608 I don't need to be lawyer to make guesses on a TH-cam video. Freedom you know?
@ I don’t need to be a lawyer to make guesses Karen. Thanks for your input though.
The aunt needed to say early onset Alzheimer's.
People can have early onset dementia. Alzheimer’s is a type of dementia but not all dementia are classified as Alzheimer’s. Dementia is an umbrella term. My aunt has frontotemporal dementia. Her friends constantly say she has Alzheimer’s. She does not. I correct them and explain that she was tested for Alzheimer’s. That is not what she has.
He was a good man but you only saw him less than 10 times as an adult🥴. Chile speak yo truth, he ain’t here no more. Why were yall so distant?
Interesting logic that I don’t agree with, if I cared for my sibling in our older years, I wouldn’t expect a cent for that from their inheritance, I would do it out of love and expect nothing in return. I would want their children to receive what’s rightfully theirs. Greedy people.
The Aunts got 10 grand when their dad died. The neice got 10 when her father then passed. Those aunts being very greedy
The daughter here has all rights.. but her attitude, oh man 🤷🤦
I think the Aunt Judith should receive the money as she was the ONLY one who took care of him during the time he was sick. The aunt that saw him 5 times doesn't deserve anything and the daughter doesn't either, i don't care that she is his daughter. She didn't even know his age when he died, she didn't see her father when he was sick, she tried to initially paint him out to being difficult to make herself look good and then changed her tuned. The daughter never took care of her sick father but she wants his money. People are here are disgusting.
There is something about the defendant just screams, untrustworthy.
I see the point but daughter seems greedy but I wouldn’t hunt her down about it. The aunts look very well put together and I’m sure they don’t need it.
Defendant just seems to have an attitude for no reason ?
Defendant knows nothing about her dad
I'm not a fan of the defendant.
She was never close to her father wow
DEMENTIA AT 57??? Even at 67 that's bad. Doctor here, don't need your replies to 'edumicate me'.
As you probably already know, they explain a potential reason in the next episode. ;) My first thought was alcohol. Wernicke-Korsakoff, but they didn't specify to which addiction he was afflicted.
One of her aunts at least have real her but the niece ain't fooling no one with that wig. 😆
I think jj is trying to look at from a moral vs a legal standpoint.
These two heathen plaintiffs getting on my nerves. Money hungry!!
Why did she get loud, jj didnt say it correctly lol
Where is part three?
Back bby!
Excuse my language but this is a damn shame
Just a 411 to anyone. You DO NOT need a lawyer or any company to be able to collect from Unclaimed. Just contact them directly.
The niece is fine
Wow
Where is Part 3?
This is so gross. Family fighting over a few hundred dollars. How the greed is so disgusting
A few hundred dollars is a lot to some*
JJ is out of line with her questioning, this is purely an entertainment episode, Judy is wrong with this one. 😊
Part 3 th-cam.com/video/N1k4INclBXU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=oB4puQxNfCbepmld
Crap daughter, better sisters.