I'm so grateful that Hubble is still highly functional after 30 years! It continues to capture the beauty and wonder of the universe and has captured the imagination and hearts of millions of people. ❤
In order for certain new technology to be expressed, or to be released, there has to be a willingness to receive it. And this requires both the change in the collective consciousness but it also requires that there are certain scientists who are willing to question what most scientists are currently not questioning, including materialism. Now, just as a concrete example here, you have the whole concept of free energy. This can be explained actually in terms of what is currently known by quantum physics. You have observations made by quantum physicists in bubble chambers, that you can have a state where there are no particles, suddenly one particle appears, divides itself into several particles, they collide again and then disappear. There have been some scientists who have been willing to speculate that, beyond what can be observed even at the subatomic level, there must be some kind of energy field, some call it a quantum field, some call it a ground state, whatever they call it, but it has basically been proven by quantum physics, that there is some state beyond the physical material realm. And in that state there is energy. And that energy can then enter the material realm and become physical matter. If you take this and put it together with a big bang, you can see that, is it actually logical that all of the matter and all of the energy that is now in this huge universe was compressed into something called a singularity? Whatever that may be. Is this really logical? Obviously, all of the matchup could not fit in there. But could the energy actually fit into a single point? Is it not just as logical to say that there was an event where energy from a different realm entered the material frequency spectrum. And this means that all of the matter that you see in the world today is actually created from energy. This was proven by Einstein. And that energy must have come from somewhere, and what has now been proven for those who are willing to see it by quantum physics, is that that energy came from another realm. It entered the material world, the physical realm from another realm. Well, is that not free energy? Is it not thereby proven that the entire world is created by free energy? So does that not mean it is also possible that technology could be created, that would be able to, so to speak, channel the energy from a different realm into the material realm, where it could then be used to perform physical work or at least create electricity that could power machines that perform physical work. This is perfectly in line with what has already been discovered. See, what you have right now is, you have a state of technology, which is a reflection of the collective consciousness and the collective consciousness does not really fully accept the existence of another realm. That is why as we have said humankind has become a closed circle, a closed system subject to the second law of thermodynamics. That is why the technology you have today, the energy sources you have today, you think that the only way to provide energy is to either burn some kind of fuel, or split the atom, and free the energy that is already in the material realm. But this is simply a certain mindset that is based on an incomplete understanding of how the world works. As I said, quantum physics has already proven that the world is created by energy from another realm, and therefore, there is naturally much more energy in that realm and it is a matter of raising our view of the world, our understanding of the world, raising the collective consciousness until we can grasp what that other realm is like, and therefore be able to receive the technology that can make use of the energy that is there. It may be not so constructive to talk about free energy, but it is free in a sense that there is no cost, there is nothing that needs to be burned or consumed in the material realm in order to harness this energy and therefore, we might call it a different name and many different names could be suggested.
To give fans and viewers a perspective, would it be possible to turn Hubble around and point it at the earth. Publish a few images of earth taken at max resolution/magnification.
I don't think that would work It's optimized for taking in teeny tiny amounts of light and generating images. I think pointing at the earth would be kind of like trying to zoom in on an ant with binoculars.
The only perspective here is that people are using internet for commenting and asking stupid questions without spending the same amount of time to make some research... Hubble has 57 meters focal length..It would be like looking grand canyon from a straw....Secondary the brightness of the earth would "roast" its optics and sensors the moment it would turn them towards us...And moreover the focal length combined with its orbiting speed would only produse the bluriest images you can ever imagine...
Agreed. It is created by combining Hubble's image(s) and data on star positions & distances from the Gaia space telescope to give you a realistic, & scientifically correct, 3D fly through. Very cool. There was another one released last week (I think) of the Eagle Nebula
That's what I was wondering. It looks like a planetary nebula caused by a supernova but the object at the centre looks more like a normal star than it does a remnant. Ok, bit of research. It looks like it's a Wolf-Rayet (WR) star. "A separate group of stars with WR spectra are the central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPNe), post-asymptotic giant branch stars that were similar to the Sun while on the main sequence, but have now ceased fusion and shed their atmospheres to reveal a bare carbon-oxygen core."
If you watch the previous video unveiling the 30th anniversary image release (the "cosmic reef") there is explanation of this region & the creation of this 3D "fly-through" th-cam.com/video/caLc3hIMApQ/w-d-xo.html
No doubt this is impresive... but 30 years is a very long time for science. Why don’t we have 1000x more powerful telescope by now? No Hubble 2.0 instead of incremental improvements to an aging (yet awesome) telescope?
If we take care of earth and find a way to destroy plastic and grow more nature without anyone cutting it and without wasting water, our earth might be clean and beautiful like this
Crickey, if you want genuine appreciation musically of these images, check out Eric Whitacre's Deep Field using images from Hubble. Here's the link th-cam.com/video/yDiD8F9ItX0/w-d-xo.html Watch on the biggest screen you have with headphones plunged into the device you have (ie. not ambient sound). Prepare to have everything blown apart!
I'm so grateful that Hubble is still highly functional after 30 years! It continues to capture the beauty and wonder of the universe and has captured the imagination and hearts of millions of people. ❤
It is first time that shed tears to a science picture.
just breathtakingly beautiful
I love Hubble it is just such a cool Telescope that took amazing images!
Hubble is awesome man... Speechless
Wow, Hubble forever
In order for certain new technology to be expressed, or to be released, there has to be a willingness to receive it. And this requires both the change in the collective consciousness but it also requires that there are certain scientists who are willing to question what most scientists are currently not questioning, including materialism. Now, just as a concrete example here, you have the whole concept of free energy. This can be explained actually in terms of what is currently known by quantum physics. You have observations made by quantum physicists in bubble chambers, that you can have a state where there are no particles, suddenly one particle appears, divides itself into several particles, they collide again and then disappear. There have been some scientists who have been willing to speculate that, beyond what can be observed even at the subatomic level, there must be some kind of energy field, some call it a quantum field, some call it a ground state, whatever they call it, but it has basically been proven by quantum physics, that there is some state beyond the physical material realm. And in that state there is energy. And that energy can then enter the material realm and become physical matter. If you take this and put it together with a big bang, you can see that, is it actually logical that all of the matter and all of the energy that is now in this huge universe was compressed into something called a singularity? Whatever that may be. Is this really logical? Obviously, all of the matchup could not fit in there. But could the energy actually fit into a single point? Is it not just as logical to say that there was an event where energy from a different realm entered the material frequency spectrum. And this means that all of the matter that you see in the world today is actually created from energy. This was proven by Einstein.
And that energy must have come from somewhere, and what has now been proven for those who are willing to see it by quantum physics, is that that energy came from another realm. It entered the material world, the physical realm from another realm. Well, is that not free energy? Is it not thereby proven that the entire world is created by free energy? So does that not mean it is also possible that technology could be created, that would be able to, so to speak, channel the energy from a different realm into the material realm, where it could then be used to perform physical work or at least create electricity that could power machines that perform physical work. This is perfectly in line with what has already been discovered. See, what you have right now is, you have a state of technology, which is a reflection of the collective consciousness and the collective consciousness does not really fully accept the existence of another realm. That is why as we have said humankind has become a closed circle, a closed system subject to the second law of thermodynamics. That is why the technology you have today, the energy sources you have today, you think that the only way to provide energy is to either burn some kind of fuel, or split the atom, and free the energy that is already in the material realm. But this is simply a certain mindset that is based on an incomplete understanding of how the world works. As I said, quantum physics has already proven that the world is created by energy from another realm, and therefore, there is naturally much more energy in that realm and it is a matter of raising our view of the world, our understanding of the world, raising the collective consciousness until we can grasp what that other realm is like, and therefore be able to receive the technology that can make use of the energy that is there.
It may be not so constructive to talk about free energy, but it is free in a sense that there is no cost, there is nothing that needs to be burned or consumed in the material realm in order to harness this energy and therefore, we might call it a different name and many different names could be suggested.
What a time to be alive
This is purely amazing...
great video
I absolutely love it !
Amazing! I wonder if we could visit any of those places!
(Mon 11 Jan 2021 1437)
This is true space art.🤩
Are you a txt fan ?
Yes, I love TXT🤗
@@AfterMJYJ your favourite is younjun...
Mine too
@@brijendrapoonia526 Oh, you're MOA, too. Nice to meet you on the space telescope channel🌠😇
@@AfterMJYJ yeah 😊😊
at what distance form the sun do comets start showing their tails?
I LOVE SPACE
So nice
This video is awesome 🇺🇸👑💕
Great vid!
Marvelous
is the 3d representation realistic or made up just to give us the idea? i mean the conversion from 2d image into 3d space respects distances etc?
To give fans and viewers a perspective, would it be possible to turn Hubble around and point it at the earth.
Publish a few images of earth taken at max resolution/magnification.
I don't think that would work It's optimized for taking in teeny tiny amounts of light and generating images. I think pointing at the earth would be kind of like trying to zoom in on an ant with binoculars.
The only perspective here is that people are using internet for commenting and asking stupid questions without spending the same amount of time to make some research...
Hubble has 57 meters focal length..It would be like looking grand canyon from a straw....Secondary the brightness of the earth would "roast" its optics and sensors the moment it would turn them towards us...And moreover the focal length combined with its orbiting speed would only produse the bluriest images you can ever imagine...
Величайший телескоп всех времён 😊
Mind boggling.
2021 GN10 📸📷
Parallax is pretty cool
Where can i found the long music background?
Anyone found long version of the song? Or anything similar?
thank you :)
"And OH! what a feeling, when my soul went through the ceiling," and onward up to Heaven I did ride". John Prine lyrics.
Is this a real telescope footage
Yes and no, It's a computer simulation of the data from the telescope. Regular telescopes don't do 3d. That's added with the computer
Agreed. It is created by combining Hubble's image(s) and data on star positions & distances from the Gaia space telescope to give you a realistic, & scientifically correct, 3D fly through. Very cool.
There was another one released last week (I think) of the Eagle Nebula
@@tabularasa0606 okay thank you
All i can say is WOW
Is that real or animated ?
Wow!❤️
Muito legal 👍
Is this a supernova remnant or some other type of object?
That's what I was wondering. It looks like a planetary nebula caused by a supernova but the object at the centre looks more like a normal star than it does a remnant.
Ok, bit of research. It looks like it's a Wolf-Rayet (WR) star.
"A separate group of stars with WR spectra are the central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPNe), post-asymptotic giant branch stars that were similar to the Sun while on the main sequence, but have now ceased fusion and shed their atmospheres to reveal a bare carbon-oxygen core."
@@sandrock190380 thanks Astro!
If you watch the previous video unveiling the 30th anniversary image release (the "cosmic reef") there is explanation of this region & the creation of this 3D "fly-through" th-cam.com/video/caLc3hIMApQ/w-d-xo.html
Is this real or cgi?
yes
Thank you for the CGI 😏
They had knowledge of making fantastic thing before 30y.if they create with now technology 🦿🦾what it will be.................... tremendous👏👏👏👏
No doubt this is impresive... but 30 years is a very long time for science. Why don’t we have 1000x more powerful telescope by now? No Hubble 2.0 instead of incremental improvements to an aging (yet awesome) telescope?
james webb space telescope... eventually
Makes me wonder what will happen if the Universe ends
Is that even real??
Cadê o Borges e o Daddy?
If we take care of earth and find a way to destroy plastic and grow more nature without anyone cutting it and without wasting water, our earth might be clean and beautiful like this
Let me know when we get to heaven.
Is this really true?🤔🙄
LIFE ON OUR PLANET AS ADAPTED TO THE CLIMATE CONDITIONS , OTHER LIFE FORMS WILL OBVIOUSLY DO THE SAME .
1 st commenter
Crickey, if you want genuine appreciation musically of these images, check out Eric Whitacre's Deep Field using images from Hubble. Here's the link th-cam.com/video/yDiD8F9ItX0/w-d-xo.html
Watch on the biggest screen you have with headphones plunged into the device you have (ie. not ambient sound). Prepare to have everything blown apart!
Waw
Small you Tuber Sapporo me gyse🙏🙏🙏
This look like a cartoon lol
The awake box respectively time because deposit separately blink against a foamy turtle. ashamed, responsible writer
edit
This video is awesome 🇺🇸💕👑