These nebulae are where stars and almost certainly planetary systems too are forming so I expect it would be like very early on in our solar system's history - think chaotic and messy and deadly with a supermassive, superluminous star or few sending huge amounts of radiation blistering through the nebulae and systems within being maelstroms of whirling debris taking shape into new worlds but regularly bombarded and glowing hot from their formations. With suns that are unstable, still flaring, spinning far faster than our sedate yellow dwarf and thus with more star spots (sunspots) and with strong, active, variable T-Tauri type stellar (solar) winds. Think lots of impacts, lots of surfaces glowing red hot or seas of lava and on surfaces of newly born worlds and in their meteor-storm filled skies, vast clouds of dust coalescing and sometimes crashing together or fragmenting apart; falling inwards or being driven outwards from their orbits and generally very volatile conditions. Not great for life - yet. Once the stars and planetary systems here have settled down though, when orbits stabilise and worlds have fully formed and the debris clouds dispersed - asteroids and comets hopefully settled and organised in their belts and the most superluminous (& dangerous) stars have exploded and spread their precious new-forged elements like gold, uranium and metals around; then in a mere few hundred million years, maybe, who knows?
@@Astrostevo These stars are so massive and so energetic that I would not put it past them to nurture a planet sized rock as distant from the newborn star as is the theoretical oort cloud is to the sun Life is tenacious. .it adapts..to often unthinkable conditions. There could be life long adapted even to such nearly unimaginable conditions. Wouldn't bet against it
A question, but first, this is overwhelming! Great gratitude to this excellent team. I'm an SFF author attempting to understand interstellar travel. What speed is the "camera" moving in this video, such that stars actually fly past, Star Trek-style? Thank you!
Thanks for your answer, @FINDLAY GARDENER. However, I'm looking for a fact fight against my lifetime of skepticism about that effect. I may be struggling with my planet-based bias, but it seems to me that, regardless of how fast you went, stars wouldn't look like scuba diving through bioluminescent particles at night, which I've done, and during which you can't help but imagine being aboard a UFP ship during warp speed flight. I love the effect, but it seems to me that stars are simply too far apart to create it, regardless of the speed of the traveler. Am I wrong?
@@aliasmat But how can virtualisation of non visible spectrum give a correct picture of how it looks to the human eye. Is this what I would see if I was in a planet near enough to see it? And can I find the real image anywhere?
Its just like looking into a ctscan of a foetus or xray of the heart. Going by that definition of "real" image, we should only see either complete darkness or blood
If we were "close enough", still we couldn't see the whole extent naked-eyed either not only because of the surrounding massive dust layers but also due to our relative position/scale & time (spacetime) - a parable would be that we can draw a RIGHT-angle triangle consisting of 359 degree on earth's surface but only limited to 180 degree if done on a piece of paper. Another factor is that is located 160,000 light years from us, which means now at this point of time, it may no longer exist as per the visual we are getting that actually show its appearance 163,000 years ago
Forgive me on my part, but are these actual photographs or artist conceptions. To me, and this is where my stupidity is showing, the 3D in these just blows my mind. I know this sounds so ridiculous...
@R. M. Amaral Machado Avila-Canario You are not stupid. The clip is a 3D visualization using real photographs and scannings, so it's a bit of both. It's not a camera recording (it would take millions of years to fly through a nebula like that with a spaceship as it's many light-years across). You can read more in the description below the video =)
At 1 PM EDT today, April 24, 2020, join two astronomers for a LIVE discussion of the incredible image and this 3D visualization. The Hubble Space Telescope 30th Anniversary Image Unveiling th-cam.com/video/c5vYIWOKF_o/w-d-xo.html
@Be Positive The nebula is a real object, but the clip is a 3D visualization using real photographs and scannings, so it's a bit of both. It's not a camera recording (it would take millions of years to fly through it like that with a spaceship).
![Cosmic Reef: NGC 2014 & NGC 2020 [Ultra HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WoFQTYUSi_U/mqdefault.jpg)
My uncle composed the music to this. Joseph DePasquale. He’s so talented.
Wow 😮❤️
Awesome
Prove it bitch
@@9iineClips uncalled for, unnecessary, maybe a little sunlight would do you some good basement dweller?
Great :) !
Wonderful! A description from an expert about the nebula shown is needed.
Watch at 1 PM EDT today - expert commentary just for you - th-cam.com/video/c5vYIWOKF_o/w-d-xo.html
@@hubblespacetelescope May I watch too?
I think hubbles should be live and free in youtube for every human being..
I felt so good so complete seeing this and such beauty to the eyes thank you hubba tele ❤️✝️🌎🙏
HAPPY BIRTHDAY HUBBLE.....30 YEARS
I have no idea how habitable this nebula star systems would be, but it would have been amazing to live there. I know, "The grass is always greener."
These nebulae are where stars and almost certainly planetary systems too are forming so I expect it would be like very early on in our solar system's history - think chaotic and messy and deadly with a supermassive, superluminous star or few sending huge amounts of radiation blistering through the nebulae and systems within being maelstroms of whirling debris taking shape into new worlds but regularly bombarded and glowing hot from their formations. With suns that are unstable, still flaring, spinning far faster than our sedate yellow dwarf and thus with more star spots (sunspots) and with strong, active, variable T-Tauri type stellar (solar) winds. Think lots of impacts, lots of surfaces glowing red hot or seas of lava and on surfaces of newly born worlds and in their meteor-storm filled skies, vast clouds of dust coalescing and sometimes crashing together or fragmenting apart; falling inwards or being driven outwards from their orbits and generally very volatile conditions. Not great for life - yet. Once the stars and planetary systems here have settled down though, when orbits stabilise and worlds have fully formed and the debris clouds dispersed - asteroids and comets hopefully settled and organised in their belts and the most superluminous (& dangerous) stars have exploded and spread their precious new-forged elements like gold, uranium and metals around; then in a mere few hundred million years, maybe, who knows?
I wish people could live in one too without issues to do so.
@@Astrostevo These stars are so massive and so energetic that I would not put it past them to nurture a planet sized rock as distant from the newborn star as is the theoretical oort cloud is to the sun
Life is tenacious. .it adapts..to often unthinkable conditions. There could be life long adapted even to such nearly unimaginable conditions. Wouldn't bet against it
A question, but first, this is overwhelming! Great gratitude to this excellent team. I'm an SFF author attempting to understand interstellar travel. What speed is the "camera" moving in this video, such that stars actually fly past, Star Trek-style?
Thank you!
Thanks for your answer, @FINDLAY GARDENER. However, I'm looking for a fact fight against my lifetime of skepticism about that effect.
I may be struggling with my planet-based bias, but it seems to me that, regardless of how fast you went, stars wouldn't look like scuba diving through bioluminescent particles at night, which I've done, and during which you can't help but imagine being aboard a UFP ship during warp speed flight. I love the effect, but it seems to me that stars are simply too far apart to create it, regardless of the speed of the traveler. Am I wrong?
Great stuff 👍
Very nice thanks for you 🌹👍
Incredible image
Splendid! Oh if we could visit that place!
(Mon 11 Jan 2021 1447)
HAPPY 30TH ANNIVERSARY!!
Where can I get the song?? 😍😍😍
Outstanding
Respect to cameraman who risked his life flying in deep space and making this video
Todays Astronomy Picture of the Day!
So cool!
Happy birthday 🎂
С днюшкой :3
If only my 30 year old telescope performed this well.
Is this a real image or a virtual image?
Both combined, based on data on non-visible spectrums as well eg infrared
@@aliasmat But how can virtualisation of non visible spectrum give a correct picture of how it looks to the human eye. Is this what I would see if I was in a planet near enough to see it? And can I find the real image anywhere?
Its just like looking into a ctscan of a foetus or xray of the heart. Going by that definition of "real" image, we should only see either complete darkness or blood
@@aliasmat So we have no idea how these celestial bodies would look if we were close enough to see them?
If we were "close enough", still we couldn't see the whole extent naked-eyed either not only because of the surrounding massive dust layers but also due to our relative position/scale & time (spacetime) - a parable would be that we can draw a RIGHT-angle triangle consisting of 359 degree on earth's surface but only limited to 180 degree if done on a piece of paper.
Another factor is that is located 160,000 light years from us, which means now at this point of time, it may no longer exist as per the visual we are getting that actually show its appearance 163,000 years ago
Forgive me on my part, but are these actual photographs or artist conceptions. To me, and this is where my stupidity is showing, the 3D in these just blows my mind. I know this sounds so ridiculous...
@R. M. Amaral Machado Avila-Canario You are not stupid. The clip is a 3D visualization using real photographs and scannings, so it's a bit of both. It's not a camera recording (it would take millions of years to fly through a nebula like that with a spaceship as it's many light-years across). You can read more in the description below the video =)
What a sight
Nice
Har har Mahadev..🙏🙏🙏
At 1 PM EDT today, April 24, 2020, join two astronomers for a LIVE discussion of the incredible image and this 3D visualization. The Hubble Space Telescope 30th Anniversary Image Unveiling th-cam.com/video/c5vYIWOKF_o/w-d-xo.html
Is this Graphics or real?
Real. There was a BBC documentary on the telescope this week. This is the latest pictures by it this week.
@@WeAreWatchingU Superb, Thank you
@Be Positive The nebula is a real object, but the clip is a 3D visualization using real photographs and scannings, so it's a bit of both. It's not a camera recording (it would take millions of years to fly through it like that with a spaceship).
لا إله إلا الله محمد رسول الله
Wow, be careful or else Paramount studios will sue you for use of copyrighted material of the "ribbon" from StarTrek "Generations"
I'm pretty sure the judge would agree: this nebula came first. : )
If that created by a coincidence ; Then I worship coincidence .
sorry, looks fake