SOME MEN HAVE A UTERUS?! Douglas Murray, Bret Weinstein, Eric Weinstein, Sam Harris

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ค. 2024
  • #douglasmurray #maajidnawaz #samharris #bretweinstein #ericweinstein #europe #immigration #refugee #immigrants #muslim #islam #islamophobia #exmuslim #exmuslimlive #exmuslimsameer #debate #muslims #israel #israelpalestineconflict #hamas #isis #islamic #politics #cnn #fox #terrorism #palestine #socialjustice #antifascist #leftist #liberal
    Full discussion here: • Will Islam Destroy Us?...
    Welcome to the Pangburn Universe, governed by the laws of good faith & helpfulness.

ความคิดเห็น • 273

  • @Pangburn
    @Pangburn  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    If you enjoyed this clip, drop a like on the video and consider subscribing.
    Watch all 6 Douglas Murray Pangburn debates here: th-cam.com/video/mEsk3tPpLs0/w-d-xo.html
    If you want to support our goal to bring freedom of speech to the world, please consider signing up as a channel member. www.youtube.com/@Pangburn/membership
    If you need a VPN service, we've secured a sweet deal! $ 83% off! piavpn.com/Pangburn
    Using this VPN service helps support our ability to bring you new content!

    • @alexanderwhite298
      @alexanderwhite298 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So the video is not good there was not anything of deep understanding or of questioning. It is a mass of criticism without substance as to why there is criticism. The European enlightenment came to be because of weapons being used and colonization. The scientific method is not questioned it's the philosophical methods that are questioned. Where only the western philosophy works is a form of dogmatic ideology. When asked and criticized on what is wrong with the system is not to come up with a question that asks what are better ones. The answer is simple: it's to change and adapt to be better than the past.
      So in conclusion this video was nothing more than westerns saying my methods are better because we have the power.

    • @emmalouie1663
      @emmalouie1663 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where are the women?

    • @yuleassagai1684
      @yuleassagai1684 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@emmalouie1663 at home

    • @randyross5630
      @randyross5630 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Forethought: Autopsy Data shows 1 in 2500 Males have Wombs and Upper Vaginas... Why, well let me explain, they were Pseudo Male Hermaphrodites at Birth, and than right after Birth they Sewn up their Ambiguous Genitals, and generally speaking called it a Day, and 2-3 Days Later the Baby is out of Incubator and off to the Parents, with often the Parents not even knowing any of this... But than You'd Say, But Randy? There is generally between 1 in 1200 to 1 in 2000 people born as Pseudo Male Hermaphrodites (everything but Ovaries) with Ambiguous Genitals why than 1 in 2500 for Autopsy Data, and it's simple, some Atrophy, and some are Removed due to later Complication of having a partly Atrophied Organ inside someone, although the Operations are Generally done under the guise of Appendicitis and the patient generally doesn't know... So the Statistics fit with each other... If someone is not injecting this into the Conversion than they are Being Dishonest and are Propaganda! I am Out of Here, No End Thoughts Coming, these people speaking are Bigots on this Subject...

    • @ShonMardani
      @ShonMardani 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All these men are talking about how Muslims do not like women, just take your wives there and ask them about their experience with Muslim man.

  • @sofly7634
    @sofly7634 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    A government that can make you believe absurdities
    Can make you commit atrocities

  • @SillyTube9
    @SillyTube9 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

    The positivity that Maajid associates with American Muslim attitudes towards gays versus the negative attitudes in the U.K. is not a function of any more wisdom on the part of American Muslims, though. That’s a product of numbers. Islam always PRETENDS at generosity of spirit, and kindness towards women and gays, when it is a minority in the population, but the INSTANT it becomes a majority, or even a minority with a significant power base, it starts trying to take away other people’s liberty.

    • @adamt5622
      @adamt5622 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As seen in Hamtramck, Michigan - where liberals celebrated the election of a Muslim-majority council, who then decided to exclude LGBTQ+ flags from city property.

    • @lizparker8431
      @lizparker8431 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Spot on; that’s exactly how it works.

    • @jkkjeldsen8249
      @jkkjeldsen8249 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Precisely.

    • @adamt5622
      @adamt5622 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      FU
      YT

    • @whoahorseywhoa4685
      @whoahorseywhoa4685 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@adamt5622it’s true

  • @scotmacc
    @scotmacc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    Our countries are tired because our governments are eating each other alive. We also allow sworn enemies to waltz into our communities by the million. The real pain is to come.

    • @jabronisauce6833
      @jabronisauce6833 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s the plan lmfao the countries aren’t at odds they’re all in it together in replacing us lmfao

    • @Despiser25
      @Despiser25 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Bill isnt even due yet. At some point it will come due and it will be an amount that can never be repaid. 34T is Americans operational debt not the real national debt.

    • @stephentumlin8613
      @stephentumlin8613 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And you’re a racist or xenophobic if you don’t want people who OPENLY hate you into your country by the millions. To even pretend like they’ll give us any sympathy is beyond naive. It’s frankly suicidal.

  • @julioramirez8768
    @julioramirez8768 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love how the rest of the stage is keenly listening. They are not jumping to reply emotionally. This is the type of intelligence discourse needed.

    • @dukecity7688
      @dukecity7688 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's because they all basically agree w each other. There's no opposition.

  • @kerrylawson7515
    @kerrylawson7515 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Weinstein forgets that McCarthy was right.

  • @LusciousTwinkle
    @LusciousTwinkle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    im so happy to get a video like this as soon as I turned on YT!!!

  • @Knight192
    @Knight192 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    who picked out those uncomfortable chairs and placed them so close together? some euro-trash designer needs to be fired

    • @gregbatchelor9205
      @gregbatchelor9205 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Who decided to put Bret next to Sam? I'm sure they both appreciated that 😆

    • @ameliaannhouck2670
      @ameliaannhouck2670 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      EURO TRASH WHO ELSE?

  • @kylec1411
    @kylec1411 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Douglas is such a funny dude lol love him

  • @fiorenzaattanasio4796
    @fiorenzaattanasio4796 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I love Douglas Murray he speaks for me always

    • @tolotolo2380
      @tolotolo2380 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I suggest that you come out of the closet

  • @gertfrobe8148
    @gertfrobe8148 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Someone ask sam about his trump derangement

  • @EndlessMtns
    @EndlessMtns 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Social justice is doublespeak for justifying socialism.

    • @Lucas-hb1uq
      @Lucas-hb1uq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is socialism and what is social justice and how justice at all levels is negative?

    • @MrHellweasel
      @MrHellweasel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Lucas-hb1uq "Justice is the ethical, philosophical idea that people are to be treated impartially, fairly, properly, and reasonably'. Seems like a fair definition. Social justice is an oxymoron. It presents itself as being just by prefering one group of people over another. Justice by discrimination, justice by wealth distribution (stealing), etc. It's the most ridiculous term I have heard in the last decade. Prime example in the US is affirmative action. "You are black or latino? You get admitted to uni. White or even worse, Asian? GTFO." I have yet to see how that is just.

    • @____uncompetative
      @____uncompetative 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Lucas-hb1uqSocial Justice, Diversity Equity and Inclusion, Ecosocialism, the modern etymological overloaded semantic interpretation of the word "Woke" don't need to be touched as you can get by with "Identity Politics".

    • @AtZero138
      @AtZero138 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My opinion, that a human being wants to Stand for... Something,
      Fellowship and belong, a Defender,
      Even the true hardcore extremist... Choose a side, who can judge another for Patriotism, Faith, somehow commune together, create organization etc,,

    • @Lucas-hb1uq
      @Lucas-hb1uq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrHellweasel No. justice is not a philosophy or an idea, it’s a point to reach. This is something the Conservative Party used to say they were for. Basic freedom to do what you want and be who you want to be without threat of government intervention yet now they are all about big government telling someone what to do.

  • @daves2955
    @daves2955 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    Science will win.

    • @ernimuja6991
      @ernimuja6991 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      By whom? At one point the Islamic world had science and then it's social order decayed and it shunned science. I have a feeling the same is happening in the west, so someone else will have to take up the mantle of meritocracy, empiricism and objectivity.

    • @togawearer2799
      @togawearer2799 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ernimuja6991 Well, there is a kinda hope that education is the key. Turkey is a good example, Iran is another. Whatever the self imposed theocracies do, they can't outpace their population's thirst for knowledge.

    • @togawearer2799
      @togawearer2799 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ernimuja6991 and don't forgive what the western world is doing as education..The curriculum of religious education has been circumnavigated because of religious hurtitudes...

    • @southern-samurai
      @southern-samurai 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which science? The science they pushed on us during the pandemic? Or perhaps the climate science they lie about?

    • @Renato404
      @Renato404 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ernimuja6991what a terrifying prospect

  • @johnwalsh7256
    @johnwalsh7256 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What a pantheon of great 👍 minds.

  • @bigpicture3
    @bigpicture3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The "build your house on a rock for a foundation", parable applies to the human reasoning process. This requires reflection on the question: "Who and What am I"??? Because if I understand this (most fundamental of understandings) about MYSELF, I will also know it about EVERY OTHER INDIVIDUAL on the Planet. The "Know Thyself" thing. After all society is a collection of individuals that (1) are very "diverse", and (2) requires a semblance of "unity" at the same time. Some balance of "assertiveness" and "accommodation" at the same time. Don't expect me to accommodate your feelings, because you want to avoid the "self reflection" of knowing "Who and What you are". Don't try to create a world of ideas in which you are comfortable, and everyone else is dismissed. That is JUST NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. So the "Know Thyself" is as central to the present human condition as it was in ancient times. The insanity that is arising today, is the individuals and groups that are trying to reshape "cultural thinking and practices" into a society in which they are "COMFORTABLE" (by not requiring SELF EXAMINATION) and to hell with everyone else. They (everyone else) and their perspectives don't have to be accommodated.

  • @kurt2612
    @kurt2612 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Strange thought out of nowhere.... am I wrong for thinking this?... are there more problems with respect to crime, corruption and moral decay as more people are crammed into a city? It appears (on paper) that poverty, crime and corruption run rampant in cities where the population is high per square mile. Is there something to this or am I just crazy?

    • @adriennedunne1748
      @adriennedunne1748 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No you're right. When there's a preponderance of creatures with a fallen nature, all the evils are concentrated. You're dead right

    • @HonestDogAL
      @HonestDogAL 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think crime happens most often anywhere the "have-nots" are in close proximity to the "haves".
      Note that people with enough $ to do so, are moving out of urban areas and adjacent suburbs.

    • @christinegagnon7516
      @christinegagnon7516 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also, that concept seems to be born out in various animal experiments too. Interesting stuff. Always comes back to fundamental questions about the underlying nature of socially oriented creatures.

    • @kurt2612
      @kurt2612 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@christinegagnon7516 well said.

    • @Despiser25
      @Despiser25 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just like rats when enclosed.

  • @peacewarrior1175
    @peacewarrior1175 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Word salad really pisses me off (yes, we know how intellectual you are) - that said, there are some clear and beautifully spoken truths here

  • @bardsley88
    @bardsley88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where can we get the full video? Thanks

  • @Traderbear
    @Traderbear 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Omg 😱 eating a box of crayons hoping to shite out a rainbow 🌈 lol

  • @johnroberts3824
    @johnroberts3824 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't have a uterus, but sometimes I rent one.

  • @purugigi
    @purugigi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Song at the end?

  • @helenablavatsky9136
    @helenablavatsky9136 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Those chairs seem too small.

  • @ZeeAmy
    @ZeeAmy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @thetortureneverstops
    @thetortureneverstops 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THE president of the United States. Which one are you referring to here? Current or former?

    • @jabronisauce6833
      @jabronisauce6833 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Obviously not Trump lmfaoooo

  • @hjonm9730
    @hjonm9730 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Must immediately know Majid's tailor's name. Here is a man who knows how to dress.

    • @juanzulu1318
      @juanzulu1318 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      True. A fine dude and dandy. 👍

  • @walterstockhecker5579
    @walterstockhecker5579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Should probably call it Enlightenment Minus

  • @lonewolf18650
    @lonewolf18650 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The gov took mens balls. Question: if i made laws to strip all your liberty away and to put you at a disadvantage in all facets of life would you fight for me

  • @Whatif623
    @Whatif623 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Team Vogue, believe me, I bought both 😅

  • @forbaldo1
    @forbaldo1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    2 senators per state is a good thing its like if I the little old aussie was in this discussion and the others said Don we will be quiet for 1 minute say what your big thoughts are and its mandated . shhh australia is the same coppy cats

  • @Divocwax
    @Divocwax 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So this, is what learned men nowadays look like. It took me ten minutes Google time to figure out what a Pangburn is. I had thought it was a made up word describing a specific type of anxiety. And the inbuilt dictionary which came with Firefox marked the word as an error. Turns out it's a mans name. Wiki did not have an entry for this Travis Pangburn. What does that say?

    • @AtZero138
      @AtZero138 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All words are made up...
      Sorry I had to...
      I find it interesting though...
      Cheers from Southern California

  • @liordagan9342
    @liordagan9342 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't know if it's because they have a uterus, but a lot of married men sure look pregnant.

  • @markp4967
    @markp4967 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    most men of the last two generations have uteruses (uteri?)
    The men from my Generation and the Generations before me do NOT

  • @DarenMiller-qj7bu
    @DarenMiller-qj7bu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why do people dumb it down to be religion vs science?

    • @kylemenos
      @kylemenos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's the ideas of a group with a infallibility complex Vs the ideas of the individual that demands reason. That's how it can be interpreted as religion vs science. you can see this in Woke vs realist also. collective vs singular.

    • @steveschatz6256
      @steveschatz6256 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One group says they have the answers in book. The other group says they dont know everything yet.

  • @Yaarrr
    @Yaarrr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the name of the Australian guy here? I seem to remember him having a viral exchange with an Asian woman who said he was speaking over her

  • @feldspar1333
    @feldspar1333 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Before the Weinsteins had lost their minds….

  • @dissonantiacognitiva7438
    @dissonantiacognitiva7438 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sams last point was stupid, "not by human evil but by bad ideas"
    Bad ideas thrive with evil people

    • @miamihoser
      @miamihoser 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sam Harris is not as impressive as those he’s surrounded by…ever.

    • @chrisrigby7495
      @chrisrigby7495 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sam's point, I think, is that the jihadist believes he/she is perpetrating a righteous act, not an evil one, and that only to someone not indoctrinated in jihad is the 'bad idea' (ideology) indistinguishable from evil.

    • @dissonantiacognitiva7438
      @dissonantiacognitiva7438 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chrisrigby7495 and its still naive, because some people are evil
      The idea is just an excuse
      And the worst evil people are the ones who believe they are evil things in the name of good

  • @daylinlott5723
    @daylinlott5723 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Trans men, yes. Or, next, will it be 'unscientific ' to want any kind of equality for ourselves?

  • @wuteva34
    @wuteva34 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Unfortunately,, I have to find myself in agreement with the white supremacist gay man.

  • @jmulk77
    @jmulk77 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    soft hands

  • @shaunrobjohn7712
    @shaunrobjohn7712 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jamal you looked at wounded then whitish a great thing , it not about being rap being destructive, all music should be enjoyed and make you think , but I’ve enjoyed your outlook thank you. ❤

  • @katking6820
    @katking6820 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pangburn owes $$$$$$$$

  • @mademoiselledusfonctionell1609
    @mademoiselledusfonctionell1609 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are, after all, degrees in hell. Richard Dawkins himself said
    that Christianity is the bulwark against something far worse.
    And I don't allude to wokeness (which, unlike that far worse,
    would probably disappear of itself within a couple of decades
    even if we did not actively try to put a brake to it).

  • @mikeford1273
    @mikeford1273 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I believe the Jewish people of whom I am immensely proud funded the enlightenment!

    • @whoahorseywhoa4685
      @whoahorseywhoa4685 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      how so

    • @alexanderwhite298
      @alexanderwhite298 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Pretty sure they were wandering around Europe at the time struggling just to survive because of tradition.

    • @mmr2840
      @mmr2840 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Israel ths apogy of jewish enlightenment! Enlightenment based on myths and fables ! Enlightenment built next to dimona nuclear reactor! Enlightenment massacring, slaughtering and displacing people and building the only apartheid democracy in ths middle east!

    • @nigelsheppard625
      @nigelsheppard625 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Jewish people? They used a tax? Are we talking Polish or Ukrainian peasants? Yemenite spice merchants? Hassidic scholars?

    • @mikeford1273
      @mikeford1273 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @nigelsheppard625 usually Moneylenders, remember the Catholic Church forbade usuary unless sanctioned by The Church so many borrowers went elsewhere, Jews, for far better rates.. ! So Jewish finance paid for a huge amount of stuff, armour, paintings,ships etc. So yes, they paid for everything..

  • @lsyne1870
    @lsyne1870 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What "enlightenment" are they talking about specifically?

    • @zeenuf00
      @zeenuf00 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Go away.

    • @mysikind8076
      @mysikind8076 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zeenuf00 No! 😩

  • @MrS-pe6sd
    @MrS-pe6sd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Has Sam been getting treatment for his TDS.

  • @dandavidson6097
    @dandavidson6097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    What is a woman?

    • @ReasonAboveEverything
      @ReasonAboveEverything 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The other half of procreational human binary. Adult human female. Also known as the people without Y khromosome.

    • @njoyingtube1
      @njoyingtube1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      My Mother was one . as are my daughters / granddaughters/sister . and my Wife

    • @BillHicks420
      @BillHicks420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      /watch?v=T4F6GVLBVcQ&t=633s

    • @togawearer2799
      @togawearer2799 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@njoyingtube1 What about you uncle?

    • @njoyingtube1
      @njoyingtube1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@togawearer2799 A one of the ALPHABETICALLY CHALLENGED . have you considered leaving you're safe place under the bridge , retaining a MANager then you can STOP HANDLING YOURSELF IN THE DARK . SHALOM SHERETZ .

  • @davidrandell2224
    @davidrandell2224 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Serious fools. Laugh.

  • @n0w3lly90
    @n0w3lly90 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ash Sarkar, Maajid is speaking of (literally a communist)

  • @karlyoung1713
    @karlyoung1713 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You could be one of them doug..

  • @smhollanshead
    @smhollanshead 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could it be that war is the greatest generator of innovation? Without war innovation stagnates?

  • @scottrussell5866
    @scottrussell5866 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bret Weinstein is an odd voice, publishing/broadcasting views that question covid vaccines, promoting the use of an antiparasitic alternative, and arguing that HIV does not cause AIDS on the Joe Rogan podcast. So while he defends Enlightenment science (as a biologist) he seems to delve into unreason from time to time. In the panel discussion, he promotes the western scientific “tool kit,” but on Rogan, he promotes what appears to be misinformation.

  • @antheachristinering3423
    @antheachristinering3423 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They are getting nowhere without realising that what we are heading for is the second coming of Christ . Gos is allowing us to fall for the lies of satan ....abd all the rime He srands there waiting for us to come to Him before He returns in judgment!! Read the book of Revelation.... all fore told in the book of Daniel.
    We shall not get out of this without Christ's second coming to rescue the Jewush people and judge all who reject His Salvation !!

  • @BuFFoTheArtClown
    @BuFFoTheArtClown 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The enlightenment was killed with Emmanuel Kant. The last philosopher to actually hold a torch of reason from the enlightenment era was Ayn Rand.
    Objectivism gives the proper scientific guide for human flourishing and advancement.

  • @TheCAPTAINDESTROYER
    @TheCAPTAINDESTROYER 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    God, I miss the debonair, easy quick wit and glorious articulation of the Hitch. His breadth and scope. Sam Harris, for example….i doubt he knows what humour is.

    • @m.p.7075
      @m.p.7075 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He's been making a bit of a joke of himself for a year or two now with the OTT trump stuff.

    • @Vancanste
      @Vancanste 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Um you have to be pretty damn blind to not see Trump as egregious. Don’t let ur tribalism overrule your ligic.

  • @ready1fire1aim1
    @ready1fire1aim1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Contradictory: *impossible to be true.*
    Non-contradictory: *possible to be true.*
    ❌️Contradictory Theology (knowing good), Mathematics and Physics (functions; limit built into every operation)❌️:
    1. The Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character are the exact same character (knowing good).
    2. Zero is not fundamental and nonzero numbers are fundamental (Newton/Einstein calculus).
    3. 0D is not locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are locally real (Newton/Einstein geometry).
    ⬆️ this is what we're all taught. Materialist/Empiricist version of reality.⬆️
    ✅️Non-contradictory Theology (knowing good from evil), Mathematics and Physics (relations defined by constraints; limit is a separate operation)✅️:
    1. The Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character are polar opposite characters (knowing good from evil).
    2. Zero is fundamental and nonzero numbers are not fundamental (Leibniz calculus).
    3. 0D is locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are not locally real (Leibniz physics).
    ⬆️ this is what quantum physics proved a year ago. If the Bible doesn't match Calculus and Geometry then you're doing it wrong. Realist version of reality.⬆️
    [🦄Materialism/Empiricism💩 version of Religion]:
    Interpreting the Bible with the Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character as the exact same character generates near 70,000 contradictions (see reason project) and requires heavy apologetics. A Bible interpretation which includes near 70,000 contradictions (impossible to be true) is what a snake-oil salesman would sell you. 🐍
    [🦤Materialism/Empiricism💩 version of Science]:
    The standard model of physics is Einstein's 3+1 space-time, which are considered locally real, where 0 is considered not locally real...been that way since Newton for zero vs nonzero numbers.
    Problem is...quantum physics proved the observable universe (1D, 2D, 3D and 4D) is actually not locally real...and that was over a year ago.
    (Yes, Leibniz was correct after all.) 🦧
    [Layman's terminology of locally real vs not locally real]:
    locally real = more real (Leibniz said "necessary")
    not locally real = less real (Leibniz said "contingent")
    [Closing arguments]:
    The Materialism/Empiricism package contains within itself all the contradictions, false dichotomies, paradoxes and literally "life's biggest questions". It's been a year why is everyone still using Logic, Calculus and Geometry that is contradictory at the most fundamental level? Legitimate question 🙋.
    If both Religion and Science removed their "Materialist/Empiricist-perspective shades 👓" (contradictory for a year) and put on their "Realist-perspective shades 👓" (non-contradictory for a year) they would not only cease to argue...they'd agree with each other (world first 🪙).

    • @ready1fire1aim1
      @ready1fire1aim1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      [Infinity and zero, theology, soul]:
      in·fin·i·ty
      MATHEMATICS
      a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number (symbol ∞).
      (In counting numbers 0 is the subject where positive integers "1, 2, 3 and 4 etc" are the objects).
      What is the meaning of zero in Webster's dictionary?
      a. : the arithmetical symbol 0 or 0̸ denoting the absence of all magnitude or quantity.
      b. : additive identity. specifically : the number between the set of all negative numbers and the set of all positive numbers.
      Zero is the most important number in mathematics and is both a real and an imaginary number with a horizon through it.
      Zero-dimensional space is the greatest dimension in physics and is both a real and an imaginary dimension with an event horizon through it.
      Isn't⚡God⚡supposed to be outside of space (1D, 2D, 3D) and time (4D)?
      Well, 0D is outside of space and time:
      0D (not-natural) = dimensionless and timeless
      1D, 2D, 3D (natural) = spatial dimensions
      4D (natural) = temporal dimension
      Read Leibniz's Monadology 📖 and consider that the Monad is the zero-dimensional space binding our quarks together with the strong force (it is). The other side of the Monad is Monos (Alone) and this side is Monas (Singularity) and there's an event horizon between them. So El/Elohim or Theos/Logos etc pick your language.
      Quarks are dimensionless (no size) and timeless (not-natural). The two main quark spin configs two-down, one-up (subatomic to neutron) and two-up, one-down (subatomic to proton) could easily be construed as the male (upward facing trinity) and female (downward facing trinity) image that Elohim made us in during Genesis 1.
      Quarks (no spatial extension) experience all 3 fundamental forces plus have a fractional electric charge⚡and that's why protons and neutrons (spatial extension) have electrons orbiting around them.
      In Geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions. This holds true with it being impossible for atomic protons and neutrons (spatial extension) to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks (no spatial extension).
      "Something (spatial extension) from Nothing (no spatial extension)".
      A) The postulated soul, 👻, has
      1. no spatial extension
      2. zero size
      3. exact location only
      B) Quarks are mass with no size measured in Megaelectron Volts. Mass with no size is a unique equation in that it has no spatial extension.
      Conclusion: A and B are the same thing.

    • @ready1fire1aim1
      @ready1fire1aim1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      [Important point 👉 (dont forget)]:
      0D (zero) is different from 1D-10D (nonzero) because 0D is a not-natural dimension whereas 1D-10D are natural dimensions.
      0D monad (Creator event horizon)
      1D, 2D, 3D are spatial (space) dimensions
      1D line
      2D width
      3D height
      4D, 5D, 6D are temporal (time) dimensions
      4D length
      5D breadth
      6D depth
      7D, 8D, 9D are spectral (energy) dimensions
      7D continuous
      8D emission
      9D absorption
      10D black hole (Destroyer event horizon)
      It is impossible for anything 1D-9D to approach 0D or 10D due to their event horizons. 10D contains a placeholder 0 (not locally real) for its event horizon. Only 0D is locally real on this side.
      The other side of the event horizon at the zero-of yourself (near horizon) is God.
      The other side of the event horizon of a black hole (far horizon) is not God.
      Anything we know about black holes (Destroyer) we know the opposite of that is true for monads (Creator), and we know some crazy sci-fi stuff about black holes.
      It's a mirror universe with 0D at the center. This side (Elohim; Singularity) is contingent and less real (the natural dimensions anyway) and the other side (El; Alone) is necessary and more real (pretty sure the entirety of the other side remains locally real).
      The zero-of ourselves (more real 👻) was made by the Holy Trinity (Deity; possessive; God's) in Genesis 1 which should not be confused with the Unholy Trinity (Deity; plural; gods) in Genesis 2-3 who messes with the 1D, 2D, 3D parts of us (less real 🤷‍♂️).
      Elohim was "syncretized" to just mean El during the Babylonian captivity. To avoid this simply use the Latin, "unsyncretized", counterpart Deity for possessive (God's) and plural (gods) context. (Septuagint and Vulgate use Post-Babylonian captivity "syncretized" meaning of Elohim so mistranslate as Theos and Deus, respectively).
      Gen 2-3 introduces the placeholder Elohim (not locally real) and their blind, foolish chief running amok. Plurality of bad guy that 'are' each other and 'are not' God.
      Nephilim are sons of the false Elohim associated with Yahweh (the BAAL, or LORD, of the gods).

    • @ready1fire1aim1
      @ready1fire1aim1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      [Monad in philosophy/cosmogony]:
      Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the sum "I am" of all things.
      The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both.
      The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the Monad as an *elementary particle.*
      It had a *geometric counterpart,* which was debated and discussed contemporaneously by the same groups of people.
      [In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's *Monad,* from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of *the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together* using the strong nuclear force]:
      1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the strong force.
      2) Interconnectedness: Leibniz's monads are interconnected, each reflecting the entire universe from its own perspective. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together.
      3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions.
      4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the strong nuclear force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter.
      5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz.
      6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics.
      7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions.
      [Monad in mathematics, science and technology]:
      Monad (biology), a historical term for a simple unicellular organism
      Monad (category theory), a construction in category theory
      Monad (functional programming), functional programming constructs that capture various notions of computation
      Monad (homological algebra), a 3-term complex
      Monad (nonstandard analysis), the set of points infinitesimally close to a given point

    • @ready1fire1aim1
      @ready1fire1aim1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Some first follow the true Savior but then turn away to worship a dead man." - the revelation of Peter
      THE WORLD RULER TRIES TO KILL ME
      And then a voice of the world ruler came to the angels: “I am god and there is no other god but me.” But I laughed joyfully when I examined his conceit. But he went on to say, “Who is the human?”
      And the entire host of his angels who had seen Adam and his dwelling were laughing at his smallness. And thus did their thought come to be removed outside the majesty of the heavens, away from the human of truth, whose name they saw, since he is in a small dwelling place. They are foolish and senseless in their empty thought, namely, their laughter, and it was contagion for them.
      The whole greatness of the fatherhood of the spirit was at rest in its places. And I was with him, since I have a thought of a single emanation from the eternal ones and the unknowable ones, undefiled and immeasurable. I placed the small thought in the world, having disturbed them and frightened the whole multitude of the angels and their ruler. And I was visiting them all with fire and flame because of my thought.
      And everything pertaining to them was brought about because of me. And there came about a disturbance and a fight around the seraphim and cherubim, since their glory will fade, and there was confusion around Adonaios on both sides and around their dwelling, up to the world ruler and the one who said, “Let us seize him.” Others again said, “The plan will certainly not materialize.” For Adonaios knows me because of hope. And I was in the mouths of lions. And as for the plan that they devised about me to release their error and their senselessness, I did not succumb to them as they had planned. And I was not afflicted at all.
      Those who were there punished me, yet I did not die in reality but in appearance, in order that I not be put to shame by them because these are my kinsfolk. I removed the shame from me, and I did not become fainthearted in the face of what happened to me at their hands. I was about to succumb to fear, and I suffered merely according to their sight and thought so that no word might ever be found to speak about them.
      For my death, which they think happened, happened to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. Their thoughts did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me.
      It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the rulers and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance.

  • @troyskiles3163
    @troyskiles3163 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How is religion unreason ?

    • @johans7119
      @johans7119 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      In every way. It literally relies on faith, not evidence.

    • @ReasonAboveEverything
      @ReasonAboveEverything 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It makes a claim you have to just believe.

    • @alexanderwhite298
      @alexanderwhite298 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's dogmatic.

    • @togawearer2799
      @togawearer2799 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Pick up a dictionary and read the definition of the word.. It helps if you understand the words you speak.

    • @ShonMardani
      @ShonMardani 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The only visible religion and science are the fake ones.

  • @miku5773
    @miku5773 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The enligthment started with spinoza ... seems pretty jewish to me

  • @millergre
    @millergre 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Dunning Kruger panel.

  • @artsamuel2907
    @artsamuel2907 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Douglas Murray is an expert as to if men has uterus.

    • @bobsmith5441
      @bobsmith5441 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Most sensible adults are

    • @MrHellweasel
      @MrHellweasel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      One does not need to be a biologist to know that, just like one does not need to be a physicist to understand gravity.

  • @TheCAPTAINDESTROYER
    @TheCAPTAINDESTROYER 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Sam Harris does a wonderful impression of a boring robot. Hitchens dead. Sagan dead. Harris alive. Life’s just not fair! 😂

    • @jabronisauce6833
      @jabronisauce6833 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Them two both died at the age of 62. Just a weird fact.

    • @jeffrey19771000
      @jeffrey19771000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do miss Hitchens 😢

  • @magdalenerose924
    @magdalenerose924 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why are there no women in this conversation?

  • @franfranfrancis
    @franfranfrancis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why are the chairs so close together?? Not appropriate

  • @MottiShneor
    @MottiShneor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Round the end of this video, I see that the "beacons of Enlightenment" are indeed arrogant enough to be blind to their doctrine's (accumulating) failures and its futility "for the long run". And the need to give up broken assumptions. It is not "Enlightenment Plus". It rather is NOT ENLIGHTENMENT AT ALL. It is Enligtenement-minus. I'm sorry these learned and good and civilized people, are on their way to extinction.

  • @murrayreed2881
    @murrayreed2881 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Call me a philistine but what is this "Enlightnment" ,exscuse the spelling.For goodness sake .You have to live to think,once you have food,shelter and water your doing better then most.This bloke's enlightment was his goverment ben. had a gutfull of whingers.grow up ands support yourself

    • @juanzulu1318
      @juanzulu1318 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you had ever worked with people from the middle or far east and experienced there way of thinking you would know. It is so normal to us that we forget it. But in contrast to other societies enlightened way of thinking really shines.

  • @miyojewoltsnasonth2159
    @miyojewoltsnasonth2159 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .
    *SOME MEN HAVE A UTERUS?! Douglas Murray, Bret Weinstein, Eric Weinstein, Sam Harris?*
    .
    Yeah, I had to click on this one.

    • @____uncompetative
      @____uncompetative 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As they have a Y chromosome they are male:
      medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/persistent-mullerian-duct-syndrome/

  • @leegrant7333
    @leegrant7333 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    pangburn scrapes the bottom of the shit barrel

  • @muntuthompson9177
    @muntuthompson9177 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    fools!

  • @ShonMardani
    @ShonMardani 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All these men are talking about how Muslims do not like women, just take your wives there and ask them about their experience with Muslim man.

  • @muntuthompson9177
    @muntuthompson9177 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks erik for your brlliants not this five others foo;s so self important

  • @muntuthompson9177
    @muntuthompson9177 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    murray thinks ;iike hitler danger!

    • @AtZero138
      @AtZero138 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Socialist, Vegan?..

  • @muntuthompson9177
    @muntuthompson9177 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sorry erik you look sad because of the horribleness murray and friends are spuing!

  • @krisowy79
    @krisowy79 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Climate change crisis, ecological devastation and 6th mass extinction event, wealth inequality at historic levels and young generations barely getting buy while working 70h a week, raising fascism in USA and war in Europe and you guys are focusing your intellects on important issues - who has a pee pee and who has a wee wee😂🤣🤦

    • @MottiShneor
      @MottiShneor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      piling more and more lies, won't usually persuade the learned and knowledgable. There's no climate-change-crisis, no "ecological devastation", no mass-extinction-event, no wealth-inequality at any historic level whatsoever, "young generation" are rotting of wealth and too-much free time, they're not working 70h a week because they're not working at all and don't even remember what "working" means. Raising Fascism is maybe a problem - with you and your likes, there's no "War in Europe" unless you count Russia as Europe - and in that case, that's the smallest and weakest war event of the last century.
      And the most obvious thing is the hysterical tone you try to induce on your readers, which only makes your words even less valuable.