What Did Jeffrey Epstein Want With Stephen Hawking? - Eric Weinstein
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- Chris and Eric Weinstein discuss the most recent Jeffery Epstein files. What did Jeffrey Epstein want from Stephen Hawking according to Eric Weinstein? Why did Eric Weinstein think Jeffrey Epstein was interested in physics? What is the power of understanding physics according to Eric Weinstein?
Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period from Shopify at www.shopify.co... (automatically applied at checkout)
Get access to every episode 10 hours before TH-cam by subscribing for free on Spotify - spoti.fi/2LSimPn or Apple Podcasts - apple.co/2MNqIgw
Get my free Reading List of 100 life-changing books here - chriswillx.com...
Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic here - neutonic.com/m...
-
Get in touch in the comments below or head to...
Instagram: / chriswillx
Twitter: / chriswillx
Email: chriswillx.com...
Hello you savages. Watch the full episode with Eric here: th-cam.com/video/p_swB_KS8Hw/w-d-xo.html! Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period from Shopify at www.shopify.com/modernwisdom
Delayed gratification might be good for us but bloody hell mate you make it difficult with some of these clips.
Thank you! When Eric speaks I listen
please interview Bret Weinstein next :)
Would have been better if you had just released it, we watch everything you make but drip feeding clips to hype seems pointless and annoying, after I’ve listed to all the clips because it all I can get them I listen to the whole episode and have skip 9 minutes I’ve already heard, I get it l, it’s better for your view count because it artificially adds multiple views to the same content but it’s annoying and feels shitty from a follower point of view
Don’t release the episode. This 8 minutes and 56 seconds sample was a hard watch as it is.
What’s so odd to me is the sheer quantity of people complaining about his “dramatic, performative pauses”. Where I come from, saying nothing when you’re formulating a thought is way better than filling in the silence with words like “umm”, “ahh”, “sooo”, “you know”, and my all time favorite, “like”. From a public speaking standpoint he is tremendous. Not sure if people just aren’t familiar with good public speakers in this society of real housewives and child politicians or what.
Exactly this! I totally agree
I’ve done public speaking and studied it prior, and yes; pausing to allow for reflection, pondering, or digestion of ideas, or questions etc and making eye contact with your audience is important in maintaining their engagement and anticipation.
Ah, the results of a neverending flashy stream of 300 MPH have-it-right-now 30 second average "shorts" or clips on these platforms, scrolling one straight in to the next. Constant noise, movement and stimulation becomes a pacifier. People have been so systematically conditioned, or socially engineered to have such short attention spans so much now that it makes them feel uncomfortable to slow it down, stop and reflect within a discussion like these fine gentlemen do.
I notice the difference in the medical field. Getting someone’s vital signs now (I still take blood pressure manually), vs 20 years ago is vastly different. People’s eye movements are frequent, they can’t just sit and look at the wall or the floor, they don’t know where to look, they don’t know what to do with their hands without their phone, they don’t know what to do in general when there’s a few seconds of no talking, or if there’s a few seconds of silence in general. They either have to be moving, talking or they have to get out their phone. It’s moderately infuriating.
Agreed. It’s understating things to say he’s thoughtful but he’s just thoughtful
It’s bizarre how certain critiques are infectious. Talking about him in this way is like a trend of some sort
Granted I will say he’s not great at packaging and delivering a point which is to say he’s not great at simplifying what he’s talking about. But he’s sooooo much better than he used to be …I assume he’s aware of this.
It was nice of Eric to interview Chris 😂
Chris ain't better that's why he know so much
Not even two minutes in and already had a feeling how this interview was gonna go so I checked the comments and now I won't bother with the video.
lol he doesn’t know either
@Lydynthmn it really was a waste of time
Mr House of Lords 🤦 our science pop stars are useless to humanity but tell everyone else we are stupid. And will watch us die over that elite accreditation and the But he was a friend of mine and a colleague shit 🗑️
Did hawking create a wormhole for Epstein to escape jail and travel to a Parallel island 😅
😂😂😂
No he bought underage girls with cash so it wouldn't be traced.
Island wasn't just for sex was a hospitial for extreme rich doing stuff that's illegal human testing type stuff brain transplant type attempts
I for one didnt believe JE would off himself. To me that was a made up story to supposedly get people to forget about him.. Yeah, he could be elsewhere in the world for all we know. The media lies about everything.
Think about mythology, book of enoch, greek Prometheus, perhaps they lay in waiting for the right energy to release them to fullfill the end of days.
He did a total Jesse Ventura: “Why don’t you tell me?!” Seriously LOL!
It's the Socratic Method, not the Ventura Method
@@oddthequiet4868
True. The Ventura method is to lie about being a Navy SEAL, which this guy has not done.
Down in the Baja
Read that in Ventura's voice...
wish Williamson had said: Because I'm the one interviewing you.
Eric, our interest in J E and why people are still talking about him is precisely because we know he could not have accomplished what he had in a vacuum. We know there are people "above" him that "permitted" his lifestyle. That is why we are curious to the nature of anybody that had association with him, financial or otherwise. And we KNOW the kind and calibre of some of the people he has "entertained". And we are suspicious. And I think that is the appropriate vibe.
…& E’s not the only one. At best he was a C- student in his construct.
“We”…
Most people are ignorant
And yet the vast majority are not ready to know the truth, or even not want to know the truth. The ignorant masses are only focussed on J.E. island and his "events" and are completely enthralled by it. A great diversion if ever there was one. I for one want to know the powerful people behind J.E., what their 'intentions' are and 'why'.
Is it still the same (((people))) Jesus called out years ago or is it another family or tribe I wonder. 🤔
Either way, those behind the curtain are still there because all the fools are focussed on J.E. immoral acts.
I think his point is that enough people aren't asking about the people behind Epstein, the people that created the construct called Jeffrey Epstein .
If Chris genuinely wants answers he should interview Whitney Web b. But he'd better be prepared for what he learns.
The better question is what did Stephen Hawking want from Jeffrey Epstein.
Its not a better question, we know what they wanted from Epstein, degeneracy and secual encounters that he could provide. Epsteins reasons and handlers aren't being discussed enough because they also own the media
Women. Hawking was a notorious horndog.
@@vortex_1336little women apparently
Funding
Laptop dance
The question is: What did Hawking want with Epstein.
Girls or money.
We often forget that Epstein was a rich lister, with an island, very charming and fun to hang out with.
Pretty much everyone wanted to hangout with Jeffrey Epstein, so why not the most famous physicist on the planet?
It was only after some allegations came out against him in the early 2000s that he was involved in sex trafficking that his popularity took a hit but many still stuck by him cos, remember, many just thought they were allegations brought against him by his "enemies" who were jealous of him and his money.
Of course, as more evidence came out, it became a different story.
So really, there is no question why Hawking wouldn't want to hang out with Epstein.
Everyone famous enough and rich enough did at one point.
Or both
Both were spies
Probably just Steven Hawking's autograph and maybe conversations with a very famous physicist. How hard is it to believe Steven Hawking's has millions of fans. That's just a fact.
He has no idea. He’s gaslighting you into the ground.
Anyone else thought their internet connection was buffering?
Twice. 😆
more than twice
This
lol OH the drama. Just needed a little music.
It would have been edited, but CW is just trying to eats viewer minutes with this crap.
This guy is so good at letting the other think through everything. Like a great parenting lol
Let them think the answers are their idea 👍
This reminds me of the Episode in Parks & Rec where Ron Swanson is interrogated by city officials regarding something that happened with Leslie Knopp, and to be a hostile witness, he answers every question with a question.
that was a crazy episode
😂😂😂😂😂
It’s a power play
Funny cause EVERY interview of this guy is like that, EVERY 1...
It’s crazy how a simple question turned into something completely different
So excited for round 2. The last time Eric was on was absolutely mesmerizing - can’t wait
I think this is his third appearance.
Eric Weisnstein gets the "unclear on the concept award." Epstein had no interest or ability, whatsoever, in theoretical physics. Rather he collected prominent people, and insinuated himself into elite institutions, to burnish his image of brilliance and invincibility. In turn, that's what he peddled to his "VIP johns," and to the naive girls he scammed.
He fooled too! Don’t feel bad. I thought he had something to say as well but then I looked behind the curtain.
Although i agree Eric could write a masterclass at redirecting lightning, he does answer the question: why was epstien interested in physicists? Physics is power more then money or infinity stones. With all due respect I'm having a diffucult time seeing where people are confused here. He fumfers but answers the question and asks the deeper question: Who was behind JE and why do they* want to manipulate the field?
Thanks for having Eric on Chris, love your guys chemistry.
I can only think that all the criticisms in this comments section are because they don't want to admit how much went over their heads. What a challenging interviewee, and yes, great chemistry between them. GREAT moment when Eric just said "hm" with a slight nod, and then penetrating stare for 6 whole seconds. Too many people thing if they're not being spoonfed, there's nothing nutritious to be had.
"fumfer"--never heard that before but love it. I will use it from time to time while tipping my proverbial cap to you.
no man, heres how that should have gone. '' bit surprised hawking was on his list'' eric, '' well he seemed to gather any notable person (including eric himself.) in any field, for future connections or possible compromising'' there how long did that take you to read, do you have time to watch eric doing social verbal wheelies over and over. talk is cheap sucka's
Totally with you here... I see Eric's point clearly... and can see exactly why he posits the questions to the questions... its his way of saying "Do you want to go down a useless tangent that will produce no results or insight.... or do you want to stop studying string theory (or the conversational equivalent of it) and think of this MORE relevant question that gets you to your answer much more efficiently and directly. I honestly believe that Eric W. is a great litmus test for those who can think critically and those who are trying very hard but it is mostly going over their capability to understand the larger concept and frame of reference. I see this quite often. What happens to me when I watch an Eric W back and forth is I am half the time baffled at the questions given him as if the interviewer shouldn't be so daft at getting to the meat of the problem... OR Eric asks an even better question that makes me realized I have also been looking at the wrong portion of the problem. It sharpens one's ability to get past the noise to the most applicable part of the issue at hand.
Makes sense.
This guy is so GUARDED with answers. In fact, he usually turns the subject around by asking a question to the host instead. It gives the impression that he is the host.
it gives the impression that hes hiding something
@@petetony310 He is hiding something. He knows, or suspects things he can't say or they would come after him, so he's giving us the cryptic clues to work it out for ourselves.
He needs to tell us without telling us. We need to read between the lines.
Jeffrey wanted Stephen to build him a Death Star.
The Lolita Star?
It already exists. Just ask the residents of Maui, Chile and Paradise California?
CERN and the quantum physics collider has changed everything
The simplest explanation is Epstein, when not conning people or raping girls, loved watching Nova and a part of him believed he could’ve been a scientist, but his life is too busy with other things.
If he was inviting jazz musicians to the island, it would also be reasonable to guess he loved jazz and believed if he took saxophone lessons he’d be one of the greats. Not every explanation about Epstein needs to fit a Bond villain character arc.
Bingo, I knew the guy and he was extremely boring. There is no conspiracy other than he managed to acquire an island where famous people didn't have to worry about the papparazi when they partied. There was no cabal or big secret, his parties had thousands of attendess..but people want a 'list' lol.
The reason why people are suspicious is because Epstein paid people to cover-up allegations of Hawking having sex with minors, which means that he was somehow afraid of that allegation leading back to him. That doesn't mean Hawking is guilty, but it also makes him rather suspicious.
Ur saying epstein didn't abuse underage girls ?@stoneneils
So tell more. Was he a friend to the girls?@@stoneneils
@RandomYTCommenter ready it wrong I imagine mb
Never seen someone not answer a question so hard
That’s all he does on any of the podcasts I’ve seen him on.
Dude would make a great politician😂
There’s a major difference between someone who is avoiding a question and someone who is using the Socratic method. He ultimately does answer the question, but he very wisely starts by asking the interviewer to give his answers first. If nothing else, he at least clarified the question before answering it. And it is also true that the answer basically is, “We don’t actually know the answer, but we can speculate as to what the answer might be. We can also perhaps find a way to ask a better question.”
Limitless power in the form of travel. They talk about time travel on the web. Epstein was looking for limitless power. That was his answer. I love that he builds up to the answer; he wants you to think. That’s what a good teacher does/
He can't. Some of what he knows may require a security clearance. Legally you can't say anything, but you can ask questions and talk about surrounding topics until the audience comes to their own conclusions.
The common denominator between entertainers, politicians, and academics is that they all socialize with each other. Chris Tucker can introduce you to Jay-Z who can in turn introduce you to Obama. Why does Hawking have to be interesting beyond who he knows?
Indeed. An awesome guest.
bingo. Just another name dropping piece. Enroute to compromising the kings and queens one must play many pawns.
This isn’t cryptic, he simply doesn’t want to answer the question, he knows something but he bypasses the question with questions on physics and the power there of. 😅
The Elite Breeding Program was totally swept away.. the NM Ranch, the student recuts from MIT, Harvard and other Ivy League Universities.. where are all the children??? This went on for years..
All the haters in the comments. Eric had the distinction of being the first person to have figured out Epstein, years before the docs dropped. Guy deserves respect.
Pretty sure he figured it out because I told him.
He always knew because they are both Mossad
@@pinnitt if so he did a pretty bad job shutting up. Not every Jew is a Zionist and not every Zionist is an operative.
He didn't figure out epstein. Certainly wasnt the first. Per his own recollection he had an interaction that he found extremely strange and off putting and thought he might be a "construct".
@@pinnittthis
I lose patience really quickly with people who answer every question with "well what do you think?" coupled with an affected smug smile, in an attempt to appear wise and profound.
Weinstein is very full of very hot air.
He has a unique way.
But guess what?
We NEED different styles of communication.
@@stephj9378 Do we, really? Guess what, you say? Well thankyou for your profound words of wisdom. I see why you like Weinstein's patronising, cringe inducing delivery.
Its not about JE... Its about the 6 degrees of JE.
Not only Stephen Hawking. Many scientists went to the island. Former head of media lab, some recent female Nobel laureates… and yes, they saw the girls and kept their mouths shut
No one talks about the breeding program in place at Zorro ranch he had, the trafficking was low level in comparison to what was really happening
Sounds like he's trying to distance himself from being on that island.
Epstein teleported out of that jail.
@@Ladle66he used the pedos to destroy the pedos
bahaha that's it! He saw the future and with the help of hawkins and others he wormholed his way out!! That probably explains why the cameras were on the fritz!!
I never thought he was dead anyways.
Isn’t it interesting how the establishment either makes a person a criminal by piling up charges or accusing them of trafficking underage girls?
It’s the intellectual cheerleader effect. You gain credibility by interfacing with hawking that you can leverage socially with others. Epstein wasn’t interested in Hawking per se. The people Epstein was interested in were interested in Hawking
At 5:45 minutes, finally someone is asking the right question.
After living through Covid, I think everyone needs to be very aware of the political clout saying "Trust the Science" has. Having an instantly recognizable scientist in your pocket is an obvious political advantage.
The Eye of Horus on the can staring at the camera, not even trying to hide it
Are you Egyptian? What's significant about the 👁️?
next.....lmnt?
it's a long story@@dco1019
a set for each guy
long story@@dco1019
Nowadays people are so numb and intoxicated with massive loads of content everywhere, that they forget to use their brains. A lot of people commented that Eric was a master in the art of saying nothing and expected some answers. He already did people! In his podcast! He spoke his mind to whoever wanted to hear it. He received death threats due to that. He knows the answers to the questions he is given here. But he can't say them, for whatever reason. He may even want to protect his family and close ones. He wants us to make thought exercises and to talk as much as possible between ourselves and, then maybe, one day, someone will reach the right answer.
Bingo!
Giving us the right questions
5 months late but I sincerely appreciate this comment.
Absolutely! He knows, or suspects something, but can't say it.
I think the frustration tho is all of us have questions and theories (we’re not short on those) but we’re looking for ANSWERS.
I’ve never heard anyone, until now, bring up the fact that there was someone that controlled Jeff Epstein. That is the person or persons that we should really be concerned about
Annnnd that would most likely be the Mossad...or at the very least, a Mossad/CIA joint effort. Do you see the power that you would have over a nation's foreign and domestic policy making if you have explosive, career-ending blackmail materials involving a good many of the people responsible for crafting and voting on those policies? Let's take that a step further and say that you have those same kind of materials on people that have very valuable insider information about the stock market? Do you see the economic potential in using the threat of releasing those materials to attain insider stock information? Now, look at alllllll the people Epstein had associations with and all the people that were reportedly regulars on his "Lolita Express" and on his island. Do you see the power in leveraging that kind of threat? Now, consider the idea that the weilder isn't really "Epstein," but the Mossad and possibly CIA as well...
Really? I've always thought of him as just the face or even member of a much bigger entity behind him.
@@dboi4952 U are right. I don’t know what I was thinking. Of course he was just a pawn being used by very powerful people that we never hear about. I’m sure he was just one of the many people that were being used by the elites nefarious and disgusting acts
Eric Weinstein does that annoying socratic thing where he never answers questions ...
IKR?? That damn Socrates, making people do some work to get understanding instead of spoonfeeding them like every other so-called genius.
@@j3ffn4v4rr0 It may well make for a great teacher maybe not such a great interviewee.
I love the answering questions with questions. It makes the interviewer work for his answer.
Eric is the only waiter who brings nothing to the table.
Epstien simply put influential people together to attract them to his events. People puff up near other people of influence. If they want to appear smart they puff up next to people known for their intellect. Not my original idea. Neurobiologist Dr. Andrew Huberman’s. Makes sense
I worked at the SSC for General Dynamics in 1991 thru the contract termination. The reason it was shut down was due to mismanagement of funds by people in charge. It was also because those writing the checks had no idea what benefits were possible. Or what benefits could/would be developed just by attempting to achieve what CERN has. SSC would have done it decades earlier, imo. Those are the reasons.
Chris , Have yall discused CERN ?
In depth at all ?
Reading thru the comments. ‘Performative’ must be the knew buzzword to describe whatever it is that Eric and his type are.
it's lazy and annoying... and guessing there are a lot of precocious community college kids here
I don't think JE was interested in Hawking. I think whoever was behind JE was interested in him and wanted JE to get close to learn something that Hawking wouldn't talk about to the public
That’s exactly what Eric Weinstein said
My guess is physicists are good at Quantitative Mathematics, what use is that to Epstein? Helping him write software that can help him predict and analyze market trends..
what are the banks current "hot shots" Quants.. aka, Quantitative Analysts.
So given this was in the 90's, he would have been part of an early pack of banks trying to forecast stocks to buy and sell, and when.
Because how did Epstein make money?
Stock Market.
I love how Eric played one work meeting dropping papers off at Epstein’s office into three years of podcast material
😂😂😂
Wow... That is spot on. I have heard the story so often and heard it retreaded too often that it has taken on fantastical elements
To kill,steal, and destroy / comes unfortunately in many packages 📦
Eric showing all the expressions of someone who is lying and /or manipulating on the go.
I feel like he’s being cautious and getting us the info by deduction of questions and answers
Eric Weinstein needs to be cancelled. He is full of himself and absolutely useless
Epstein was a high school physics teacher, and he also craved prestige for obvious reasons, so to me that's the link.
I thought he was a math teacher. Did he teach physics also?
Those who have figured this out have been shown to be the most successful and influential.
Eric is one of my favorite guests on any podcast. Glad to see him again
Your Mind Control is showing through....
@@getl0st get lost!
if you asked this guy what time it is, he'd ask you what time you thought it was and then go into obscure descriptions of how to build a watch
Haha at the 1:28 mark it seems like Weinstein is frozen or the internet is buffering.
This was a lot darker than expected.
I assume Effrey Jeppstein didn't die. He phase shifted.
Not an auspicious start. Replying to questions with questions, asking what you thought was terrible about it when you hadn't.....he seems really up himself and no way am I going to watch the podcast. Have enjoyed many others though and look forward to more.
You’re asking the question incorrectly. Ask why S Hawking was interested in Epstein.
I almost didn’t watch this because of the comments, but I took a chance and I can say for certain that he clearly answered it.
The relationship is physics. Why physics? He said when you understand physics or you can control those that understand it, you control the world. Why? Because those that can harness the power of physics can make nuclear bombs, travel space, control resources, etc.
Weinstein is like the parent who’s listening to their kids complain about math homework, knowing the answer the whole time, but waiting for their kid to figure it out. 😂
Is this a new interview? I love your interviews with Eric!
Yes. I think he posts the full one Monday
you link to all your comercials, but no link to full interview? wrong priorities
The answer is free energy
Many of us are just waiting for others to catch up. Nobody is brave enough to talk to the normies. Except Eric.
Maybe you hold leverage over physicists because you want them to work on a project of yours…
Please Eric, open the Portal back up and put 5% of your time toward finding the right people and pressing on the right questions to get real answers! No one else seems willing or able!
I have a great friend that is absolutely brilliant. Like a legitimate genius. He is the head of cyber security for an energy company.
He talks like this, where he thinks hes answering a question, but said a whole lot of what sounds like nonsense. After all my years, I think its a filter problem, in how they see the world, and rationalize it into words.
You can’t take out a city with a little physics. You take out a city with a little physics + a lot of engineering and labor. For my money, the engineers and mechanics (not quantum mechanics) that deserve most of the credit for nuclear energy.
Just answer the question.
I thought Eric was being interviewed?
I like Eric. I dont understand why anyone can dislike him! What is there to hate? He is intelligent and kind and full of stories and interesting bits of information! And he is kindly n decent! ❤ Eric Weinstein!
never gets to the heart of the question ... always "turns things around" ... pretends to know stuff hes not saying
He’s a natural philosopher.
Eric Weinstein is so arrogant and such a control freak his hard to listen to.
I think you guys overthinking it. If an investor (broader sense, might be a state..) want to invest long term in tech, then bet in fields which potentially having very unexpected, long term tech impact. It is like Softbank betting on software (all software, whole field). Bio, Chem is a little old, crowded, Physics potentially has a lot of steam in it. Quantum, Materials-Semiconductors is already crowded, what do you bet on what no one used for tech yet? Far end f particle physics, cosmology, gravitation is on potential field that may have huge impact without people betting on it.
Eric is brilliant as a Socratic interlocutor. I love these conversations. Thank you gentlemen.
Interlocutor
I’m picking up a “Cosmic Giggle” vibe from this “Eric” character. 🥳🤪🥳
Say more.
Who, What, When,Where,Why are Erics standard responses to Chris's questions.
I was interested in Stephen Hawking, does that mean I was interested in Limitless power?
Limitless?? SATORU GOJO MENTIONED 🗣🗣🗣💯💯💯RAAAAH WHAT THE FUCK IS A WORLD CUTTING DISMANTLE ♾️♾️
That depends: If you’re just interested in his work, that’s probably fine.
But if you’re trying to lure him into an international blackmail racket alongside many other powerful people. Then that’s a bit dodgy.
@@andybrice2711 Agreed, yet impossible to ever know now.
yes. yes it does.
They were nerding out a bit much…..if the question is what would Epstein (and the intel networks he works for) want with Stephen Hawking it might not be about understanding or possessing Hawking’s knowledge
They want to blackmail leading scientists so that they will support different agendas that they push
So whether you have a preventable pandemic or you’re wanting the world to obsess about the climate so that you can restructure society….if renowned scientists are in sync with the narrative/propaganda, it’s useful
So the real question is what other leading scientists are blackmailed?
Why is the man being interviewed turning the questions back on the interviewer?
Stephen Hawking wasn't real, change my mind
Well there’s a conspiracy theory I haven’t heard yet. Are you trolling? Or is there a reason you believe that?
Yawn
Epstein fed on the famous's weaknesses. The name cache of Stephen Hawking would legitimize Epstein to a lot of very rich and powerful people not currently in Epstein's video recording files. Epstein was a fool, and he died for it. The best thing to do is to simply let it go. Eric speaking in circles is a survival instinct many people should learn when speaking about things like this, especially in public.
Eric and his abundance of caution. But a radical heart! Can never go wrong speaking with him or his brother for that matter.
This is awful did Eric not say earlier that Jeff was a construct, he never made a trade it was all a front? 😂😂😂
The club house king, here to draw out a 2 min at most answer into a cryptically theatrical 10 min meme
Jeffrey Epstein's interest in Stephen Hawking seemed to stem from his fascination with the world of science and his desire to associate with prominent figures in various fields. Epstein was known for hosting scientific conferences and gatherings at his private island, where he invited renowned scientists, including Hawking. It's believed that Epstein sought to gain prestige and credibility by being in the company of these influential individuals, despite his lack of a formal scientific background.
Name dropping. Epstein just wanted to have the name as a talking point.
"See how important I am. I met Stephen Hawking."
Epstein traded in influence peddling and used celebrities of all stripes to make his parties attractive. I think 90% of the people on Epstein's list are free and clear with the only problem being guilt by association. I do not understand anything in detail, but I find the topic Stephan Hawking is the expert on fascinating.
Hawking was old news in physics. The science had moved past him years ago. Footnote: when Einstein died Mossad showed up at his house and took everything. They gathered his notes with everything else and drove off with them in a truck. I'm serious. "After Albert Einstein died in 1955, Israeli officials came to clean out his office at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton."
Perspective change of neutronic and water bottle on frame swap between Eric and Chris is so confusing
Dude right? Wtf lol i know i just smoked but im not THAT high
So why was he there = no answer
Power out of Vibrations to Move something is the big thing.
Stephen Hawking strikes me as the type of guy who would be pretty easy to just take somewhere.
😂😂😂 goated comment
6:16 i disagree. If anything he was interested in getting powerful people and minds in compromising positions in order to assert leverage over them.
That’s what he’s saying. J w was a currency trader publicly. Satirical metaphor he’s a currency trader but what’s the currency.
It’s really intriguing when I think I do some bad shit. These guys are multi dimensional
Hawking had ALS for a shockingly long amount of time. This was specifically an interest in genetics, not physics. With all the power players behind the ice bucket challenge, it’s guaranteed there’s something very key regarding ALS and Hawking’s ability to last.
I hear your ice bucket analogy and maybe. Certainly his ALS was his great challenge in life and he did well comparatively.
If this segment is the best bit you can find to trail this interview, I think I’ll give it a miss.
I think why he asks the interviewer questions is ; he doesn't want to say something that is obvious for him or common sense but instead he wants to pull the answer out of you .
Eric is role playing as Mr. Miyagi again, although he did get out a few statements like "why don't we care about physics anymore" that seem reasonable.
Is it some kind of preview? Where can I watch the whole thing?
Just answer the freaking question???
Science don't know shite about gravity or the speed of light.
Let's say public science. Non-public science is probably 150 - 300 years ahead of public science.
@@HerrLoeblich Let's not .
@@jamesparker4471well that's the point of an offer. you can also refuse ;-)
What happened to “Eric’s the most boring podcast guest ever” comment? It had like a 100 replies. Someone needs to filter the comments. Why?
Yep i end the conversation right there when someone pauses like that
To me its someone trying to bully and control
Glen beck went pretty in depth into the connection between Epstein and genetics and the sciences.
@5:00, ok, Eric, if we can't imagine what is was that interested JE then how do we imagine who is the organizer behind the construct?
The most simple answer to the question of what J Epstein wanted with physics is: If he got a sense for where physics was going in the future, he would know where to move his money to take advantage of that opportunity. It could be more than that though.
Or, Hawking was a person of influence, and when you are a leverage broker with no morals, you will take whatever you can to obtain more leverage. Hanging out with who the world thinks is a top science mind, gives u cred u can leverage.
@@brentjohnson9210 That too!