One-Shot Charix | MTG Standard🦀 | Against the Odds

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 108

  • @Liteyears11
    @Liteyears11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    37:00
    The opponent is so baffled by the combo that they didn't think to sac their food to survive the hit

  • @septianputra2496
    @septianputra2496 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    "Attention, a giant enemy crab is approaching."
    *Laughter sounds*
    --The opponents' last words

  • @marymccleary8757
    @marymccleary8757 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    No matter how much audio editing technology improves, please never lose the creaks of Seth leaning back in his chair when things go really well... or really badly.

  • @ebonezra8073
    @ebonezra8073 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Let's be honest here, the real reason to have the crab is to draw out all their removal so your Setessan Champion/Ooze can clean house.

  • @jerzane5617
    @jerzane5617 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I may have to turn my WG auras into this. I love the spice!
    At 4:21 Seth reveals this is actually modern and it’s been on Arena this whole time ;)

    • @ScornfulEg0tist
      @ScornfulEg0tist 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Seth here in the future future past future client league

  • @MrPluron7
    @MrPluron7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    19:00 why not flash in the solid footing?

    • @uucue
      @uucue 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm sure it was just a punt. It's not the kind of card you'd expect to have flash

  • @jacobh4077
    @jacobh4077 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    That thumbnail is hilarious, well done!

  • @arpitdesai7736
    @arpitdesai7736 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I'm shocked there is no Felidar Retreat in this pile, as the 2nd ability on there gives team vigilance

    • @hurrdurrrderp
      @hurrdurrrderp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It can be just UW deck then probably

    • @willgary8792
      @willgary8792 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@hurrdurrrderp the green cards generate almost all the card draw

  • @aaronscott7467
    @aaronscott7467 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think the reason charix is a magnet for removal is because he's a hard to kill body that you can easily stack enchantments on, which is a real concern in an enchantress shell.

  • @TheCrackler
    @TheCrackler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The game I enjoyed the most is yall's strong thumbnail game :)

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you like it :)

  • @SkorianDnb
    @SkorianDnb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    No one expects the crabby inquisition

  • @ChaosForce08
    @ChaosForce08 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    In terms of removal, I think Pacifism or Banishing Light would be better. I get that Heliod's Pilgrim can't fetch BL, but it's a much better removal spell. As I'm not sure what activated ability you care about, Pacifism seems more of a strict upgrade if you still wanted a fetchable option.

  • @bjarkov12
    @bjarkov12 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Crab kills! Nevermind the missed lethals :)
    I somehow feel crabless enchantress is better, but i appreciate that is beside the point

  • @SPEL858
    @SPEL858 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You could have included a single dryad of the elesean grove to help the crabs ability be more relevant. Plus it being an enchantment works for the deck too

  • @liviomolina4465
    @liviomolina4465 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think mirror shield could fit into this deck. It helps against removal, deathtouch and would give solid footing more power.

  • @otisnt5718
    @otisnt5718 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That warrior deck looked sweet.

  • @rustyshovel9064
    @rustyshovel9064 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love how the thumbnail is a massive island size crab smiling holding a knife

  • @TheBigGSN5
    @TheBigGSN5 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    In Soviet Russia, crab hits you for massive damage!

  • @AricHaldan0782
    @AricHaldan0782 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    12:35 I think you should have just swung in with pilgrim. If they block it you can recast the aura from the graveyard to draw 3, if they don't you draw a card from it hitting.
    19:13 why not respond by casting solid footing ?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Hmm, casting Solid Footing probably would have been better than getting it Duressed, wouldn't it ;)

    • @eduardovitalchaves
      @eduardovitalchaves 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MTGGoldfish Also at 28:08, you could destroy the equipment before blockers, right? That way you should get rid off that pesky creature :D

    • @steviekris2717
      @steviekris2717 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eduardovitalchaves Ya lot of missed plays in this video, it still had indestructible so it woulda just made him discard a card.

  • @FlawlessRhythmGG
    @FlawlessRhythmGG 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I always like running Kenrith's Transformation in my standard enchantress decks. At least in the sideboard. It's usually better than pacifism.

  • @winssports4830
    @winssports4830 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Solid footing is an underrated card. I build a Pauper Bogles deck around it using of course the 8 Bogles a bunch of auras that pump toughness and Lagonna-band Trailblazer and the other creature is the one Mana flying vigilance angel. It's hilarious.

  • @brianlinden3042
    @brianlinden3042 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've had some luck with just a mono-blue tempo deck with Charix. There's no need to mess around with trying to give Charix backbone when you've got nothing but islands. Early game you're looking to mutate a sea-dasher octopus onto a Merfolk Windrobber or Fae of Wishes, and draw cards while countering stuff and/or bouncing stuff with a Brazen Borrower. Then you get Charix down and give him flying with either a Wingspan Mentor or one Cliffhaven Kitesail that you have in the sideboard to grab with the Fae of Wishes. Best of all, since all the rest of your stuff is flyers, the Wingspan Mentor isn't a completely dead card, even if you don't have Charix.

  • @rmyancey
    @rmyancey 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Been playing this deck for a few weeks since LegenVd put a video out on this combo so there is a little awareness about Charix out there.

  • @brumpbotungus8425
    @brumpbotungus8425 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rousing read would be good in this deck I think? You can pitch the sentinel's eyes to the yard and then escape it back out. Makes Charix grow wings.

  • @NatesiKness
    @NatesiKness 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The moment I saw that the card needed vigilance for Solid Footing to turn on, I knew this was going to be an absolute pile and my body became ready

  • @Fahrenheart
    @Fahrenheart 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This looks like a *really really* good Theros limited deck.

  • @petersmythe6484
    @petersmythe6484 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel this deck helps define the term "jank them out".

  • @ThunderousChemQ27
    @ThunderousChemQ27 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the reasoning behind Nahiri's Binding over Banishing Light?

  • @oliviauzquiano7392
    @oliviauzquiano7392 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    46:44 didn't know thieves' guild enforcer had landfall

    • @christopherwoodbury7520
      @christopherwoodbury7520 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rogues are basically just temporarily animated lands. From dust to dust and all that.

  • @godtiermtg
    @godtiermtg 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe I’m just blind, but didn’t both of the enchantresses have trample at 14:00, giving you lethal damage on board?

  • @troublemaker9899
    @troublemaker9899 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video taught me that Boggles is a good deck with Setessan Champion.

  • @randym5824
    @randym5824 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A pretty good deck plus a crab.

  • @Omnicrom
    @Omnicrom 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love me an ooze with staggering insight.

  • @Yig_al_Gaib4242
    @Yig_al_Gaib4242 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if you add a few of the MDFC that has fling on its speed side? I know that is adding another color, but the card functions as another lab if need be and it could be another win-con.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The problem is that even though Solid Footing makes Charix deal damage equal to its power it doesn't actually change its power, so we'd only be Flinging it for one or two damage :(

    • @Yig_al_Gaib4242
      @Yig_al_Gaib4242 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MTGGoldfish Even if you activated Charix’s ability?

  • @raducsanyi-vo919
    @raducsanyi-vo919 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could I get the video splash art alone so i can use it as a wallpaper

  • @Evyon25121
    @Evyon25121 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not Banishing Light over Nahiri's Binding?

  • @quantumstuntmonkey7293
    @quantumstuntmonkey7293 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love this. Needs a “flying” enchantment to fly over the deathtouch.

    • @Aperson-62
      @Aperson-62 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Since he's playing Green he could play Eutropia, the Twice-Favored to give Charix flying until end of turn whenever an Enchantment enters the battlefield.

    • @DraconicArts
      @DraconicArts 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      He should use the hexproof and anti deathtouch shield from theros

  • @User__Not__Found
    @User__Not__Found 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how 99.99999999% of the wins here were like "We didnt crab them, but"... lol

  • @trainerthatroc
    @trainerthatroc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ALL HAIL THE CRAB!

  • @colinthornton3806
    @colinthornton3806 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you had the 11/12 and 10/11 setessan Champs in match one when your opponent was at 15 why not just swing it? Am I missing something or was that lethal

  • @ayties5113
    @ayties5113 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I play a Mono Green Standart Deck. I play 2 Planeswalker and 4 Instants, the rest are creatures. The Instants are all Ram Trough . Maybe it might here too. If the Crab has Trample and the Vigilance Bonus it would pierce out of nowhere for surprise.

  • @egarran
    @egarran 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why did OP scoop so fast in the first duel?

  • @gothco
    @gothco 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    No one expects the Crustacean Inquisition

  • @atk8r
    @atk8r 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    But why not protect your creatures in response to the targeting? See that happen a few times where you could have fizzled abilities

  • @magicsnaffo3661
    @magicsnaffo3661 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    always good to see an against the odds in standard, next I want the song of creation combo deck!

    • @ich3730
      @ich3730 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      man i was so hyped for that card

  • @pedrobianchi2412
    @pedrobianchi2412 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which set are those Islands from??? 😍

    • @fizzywizzy0
      @fizzywizzy0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pretty sure those are the "euro lands"

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They are Euro promos.

  • @YGORetroRewind
    @YGORetroRewind 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    CRAB BATTLE!

  • @TsahayluFa
    @TsahayluFa 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Come for the Charix-Combo stay for Setessan-tron.

  • @taylorjones1641
    @taylorjones1641 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the thumbnail a tonberry reference? Please tell me it is.

  • @danbarto8876
    @danbarto8876 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You know, Seth never once used charix's second ability. A 5/14 vigilance would still be a reasonable beater.

    • @kingfuzzy2
      @kingfuzzy2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      absoposilutly

  • @shizo66
    @shizo66 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hsould have let him attack with maul and pop it on the attack. This makes me wanna try abzan enchantress just no crab go maximum valuetown

  • @caleb7882
    @caleb7882 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You wouldn’t believe how fast I clicked that beautiful thumbnail

  • @antoninjanku3358
    @antoninjanku3358 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this deck the reason that I'll start playing arena again?

  • @mutantmoth
    @mutantmoth 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Scooping to Charix definitely counts.

  • @trunkinthefront3326
    @trunkinthefront3326 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much does he smoke?

  • @MasterCrvo
    @MasterCrvo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The lands floods

  • @christopherbryan160
    @christopherbryan160 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolute jank. I love it.

  • @Darchias
    @Darchias 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    In game 2 match 2, you should have dropped Charix. A 0-17 blocks a double-striking Warrior. Second Maul means that you were dead regardless, but I think you forgot that crab makes an excellent blocker.

  • @TheSlickmicks
    @TheSlickmicks 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did he say for modern...?

  • @kaszael
    @kaszael 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't think Solid Footing is coded properly on Arena. It should only make the creature assign combat damage with its toughness, NOT change its power to match its toughness. Unless it's just a display bug. If your 2/19 Charix (which shows 19/19) gets destroyed by Shatter the Sky, does it draw you a card? It shouldn't but the "19/19" suggests it would.
    Edit: it seems it changes the power only when it's attacking, which it still shouldn't as at no point does the actual power of the creature change.

  • @roninnder
    @roninnder 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    “Please no embercleave, embercleave gets us hard.” 😂

  • @amamozart93
    @amamozart93 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cards like Frogify and Mystic Subdual might solve the removal issue

  • @briankennedy4141
    @briankennedy4141 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    CRAB BATTLE

  • @ransomekelley2177
    @ransomekelley2177 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So I have this new deck called big red deck wins. With ugin and yirado with ironcrag fleat

  • @elizabethbauer3798
    @elizabethbauer3798 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It bothers me so much in game 2 of Match 5 when he has 4 blue sources, 2 white, and 1 green and he fabled passage's for an island while thinking out loud "we have a green source" like bruh the deck is base GW

  • @adamglass5714
    @adamglass5714 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ironic the first time he gets the combo off its on the charix background map

  • @bigbuffguy9589
    @bigbuffguy9589 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If your removal is bad, just play Banishing Light. You're playing white, so it's not like there are no good options.

  • @jenius00
    @jenius00 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kinda seems like maybe just replace Cherix with All That Glimmers.

  • @MMarcuzzo
    @MMarcuzzo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Setessan champion is the card here

  • @ethan2670
    @ethan2670 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Galaxy brain play, bottom the sentinels eyes to go get the sentinels eyes with the pilgrim

  • @sonsofsparda22
    @sonsofsparda22 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Move to historic for high alert

  • @MakiMaki.
    @MakiMaki. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Since I'm new to the channel and this is the second of SaffronOlive's videos I've ever seen, here's an honest question: Is this permanently squeaky/grating way of talking an act or is it just the way he speaks? (Don't want to be mean, just curious.^^)

  • @jackpabich763
    @jackpabich763 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does anyone else feel like these matches aren't in order? Idk why, but it just seems like the video is contradicting itself in some places. Regardless, it's a sweet janky deck with a lot of fun to it!

  • @romanodead0092
    @romanodead0092 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    damn im early today.. you dont get the 5th 1st comment everyday :D

  • @the1bmc1
    @the1bmc1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    i really dont like the highlight at the start of the video. it show the highest point. why should we watch the rest if it dosent get better than that

  • @hurrdurrrderp
    @hurrdurrrderp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "No one expects it"
    But I did.
    'Cause it was in first 10 seconds of video already

  • @Mirvana
    @Mirvana 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A Crab-Aura deck's name should be PINCH-antress

  • @davidsabotta6528
    @davidsabotta6528 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Today on ATO, is Bant Boggles still a deck if you waste 4 slots on a fat crab?

  • @alexandersepa3037
    @alexandersepa3037 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    this fucking boss

  • @danielquigley2695
    @danielquigley2695 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Worst case of crabs ever!

    • @danielquigley2695
      @danielquigley2695 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Game 5 is what ever jank player lives for.

  • @maximem.ste-marie3578
    @maximem.ste-marie3578 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    "solid footing is the most important card in our deck"
    because if you have Solid footing but no Charix, you will win the game (rolling eyes)

  • @josecisneros7730
    @josecisneros7730 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have no interest in standard, I’m only here for charix

  • @stephenhousman6975
    @stephenhousman6975 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait I thought midrange decks are suppose to be good against combo decks. Well this is relatively weak against aggro.

  • @HokaMagic
    @HokaMagic 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alseid, Seth, Alseid. NOT ELSID

  • @JocoBreRbC
    @JocoBreRbC 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rip headphone users

  • @SladeWeston
    @SladeWeston 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry man. Couldn't watch this one. I appreciate that you want to pull of your silly combo but come on. You "missed" lethal so many time. It's not an impressive combo win if you could have killed him three turns earlier by just attacking with your 23 power worth of tramplers.

  • @fabtuba215
    @fabtuba215 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This does'nt look an against the odds deck
    You should play more modern or others formats instead of standard❤