32:00 Request a rentension hearing, which is a right of due process? Lawyer did a good job of summarizing and elaborating, but dropped the ball. SCoTUS can't rule a right be requested.
No they determine if it's constitutional. Anyone can read the constitution. What you think those that write and pass the bills should be the ones that determine if they are constitutional? 😅
1:22:30 The State argues laws should not change because they have existed for 200 years. Slavery was law for much longer. Now, they've renamed slaves as citizens
![A New World Order: The Shifting Geopolitical Landscape [Recorded Live at NOW Austin]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U3gC8St7nKU/mqdefault.jpg)
This is very important for justice
1:20:30 Presumptions unstated cannot be refuted
32:00 Request a rentension hearing, which is a right of due process?
Lawyer did a good job of summarizing and elaborating, but dropped the ball. SCoTUS can't rule a right be requested.
No they determine if it's constitutional. Anyone can read the constitution. What you think those that write and pass the bills should be the ones that determine if they are constitutional? 😅
1:22:30 The State argues laws should not change because they have existed for 200 years.
Slavery was law for much longer.
Now, they've renamed slaves as citizens
1:34:20 The case had conflicting conclusions of law, but you should conclude with what I have determined to be correct because I say so😂
55:35 "yes your honor" he didn't deny the existance of Kangaroo Courts...he agreed they exist