Bravo mate, first romanian professional reviewer. Good lighting, good colour, nice format, good-looking setup! Decebal e mandru! ❤ All my respect for you! Keep up! 🫡
Not sure what camera you use, but determining the sharpness difference in two GM lenses would require a 50MP sensor at least, maybe even the 61MP sensor of the a7rv. Any less and the lens sharpness will be finer than the pixel resolution and you won't be able to tell the difference. If you see differences it is more likely to be the effect of a slight focus miss. in the corners you may be able to see differences on lower MP sensors Great video! thank you
I own the 1.2 but it’s heavy. I tried it to shoot veil shots and the last wedding I did and i think it’s uncomfortable trying to hold the veil with one hand and the camera and lens with the other. For this reason I would prefer the 1.4 version.
Hi, I think both options are great and there will always be people saying the 1.2 is better while others will swear by the 1.4. The truth is somewhere in between, but without a doubt the 1.4 is the better value, being cheaper & more compact, to a greater degree that it is optically inferior compared to the 1.2. I am not a very strong individual ,therefore, I prefer the 1.4 as well & I never expected this lens to be released after the 1.2, had I known I probably would have waited for the 1.4 instead. For those who shoot video hand held without a doubt the 1.4 is the way to go, cheers.
I am Between .... 1,2 will give better results but 1,4 is more ergonomic....more apropiate for videos and gimbal (video handheld more weight will steady better) and 1,4 same 67mm same size like 20 - 24 and 35 so ....HELP!!!!
Great detailed comparison. I ordered both and will see if the weight of the f1.2 is more than I want to deal with. That's really the primary decider for me, as they're so close otherwise.
@@fluxcapacitor3273 They’re sooo close. I was soo tempted to keep the f1.2, just because it was the 1.2 but I went with the f1.4. I found it a hair sharper and the weight difference was noticeable. If you can get past the ‘Fomo’, the f1.4 is the better buy in my opinion. And I felt I would opt to carry it more because of the weight. But I debated a lot on this one.
@@SilatShootershooting both at the same aperture you found the 1.4 sharper? I’ve bought the 1.2 already but I’m seriously debating sending it back for the 1.4. I don’t care about the price just want the lens that produces better images..
@@Svoboda1234 they're sooooo close. I found the f1.4GM a hair sharper but the bokeh was definitely better on the f1.2GM. In both cases,you really have to 'look' for it. Otherwise the images blindly were interchangeable. If I shot indoor sports I would have gone with the f1.2. But I carry and travel with my 50mm and the weight difference was enough of a difference in favor of the 1.4GM. Can't go wrong with either.
I’ve never come across one that was, all my ones are Thailand except my 135 which is made in China. It should be normal after all Sony is a Japanese company. As far as I know a great part of their products are manufactured in Thailand now as they moved production from China, but also in Japan of course.
Hi, thanks for that. From my experience it requires long exposure to sunlight so that the camera lens will act like a magnifying glass. Otherwise taking video/photographs of the sun won’t yield any damage, thanks👍
Bravo mate, first romanian professional reviewer. Good lighting, good colour, nice format, good-looking setup!
Decebal e mandru! ❤
All my respect for you! Keep up! 🫡
Thanks, your feedback and compliments are greatly appreciated 👊✌️
Getting mine 50 1.4 in the mail today actually! Very excited!
Congratulations, 🥳 you will love it.
Very nice, detailed, and unbiased review! It's so rare these days!
Thanks👌
Not sure what camera you use, but determining the sharpness difference in two GM lenses would require a 50MP sensor at least, maybe even the 61MP sensor of the a7rv. Any less and the lens sharpness will be finer than the pixel resolution and you won't be able to tell the difference. If you see differences it is more likely to be the effect of a slight focus miss. in the corners you may be able to see differences on lower MP sensors
Great video! thank you
take in mind Lorin
very nice technical review! great job!
Thanks! 👍
I own the 1.2 but it’s heavy. I tried it to shoot veil shots and the last wedding I did and i think it’s uncomfortable trying to hold the veil with one hand and the camera and lens with the other. For this reason I would prefer the 1.4 version.
Hi, I think both options are great and there will always be people saying the 1.2 is better while others will swear by the 1.4. The truth is somewhere in between, but without a doubt the 1.4 is the better value, being cheaper & more compact, to a greater degree that it is optically inferior compared to the 1.2. I am not a very strong individual ,therefore, I prefer the 1.4 as well & I never expected this lens to be released after the 1.2, had I known I probably would have waited for the 1.4 instead. For those who shoot video hand held without a doubt the 1.4 is the way to go, cheers.
I am Between .... 1,2 will give better results but 1,4 is more ergonomic....more apropiate for videos and gimbal (video handheld more weight will steady better) and 1,4 same 67mm same size like 20 - 24 and 35 so ....HELP!!!!
The final comment about using a gimbal is a really important detail to point out.
Good with my 1.4. Especially since I’m not professional. I couldn’t justify a jump of .2 in aperture
I have 1.2 & I love it.
Me2
Great detailed comparison. I ordered both and will see if the weight of the f1.2 is more than I want to deal with. That's really the primary decider for me, as they're so close otherwise.
what's your final decision? what was your findings on both?
@@fluxcapacitor3273 They’re sooo close. I was soo tempted to keep the f1.2, just because it was the 1.2 but I went with the f1.4. I found it a hair sharper and the weight difference was noticeable. If you can get past the ‘Fomo’, the f1.4 is the better buy in my opinion. And I felt I would opt to carry it more because of the weight. But I debated a lot on this one.
@@SilatShootershooting both at the same aperture you found the 1.4 sharper? I’ve bought the 1.2 already but I’m seriously debating sending it back for the 1.4. I don’t care about the price just want the lens that produces better images..
@@Svoboda1234 they're sooooo close. I found the f1.4GM a hair sharper but the bokeh was definitely better on the f1.2GM. In both cases,you really have to 'look' for it. Otherwise the images blindly were interchangeable. If I shot indoor sports I would have gone with the f1.2. But I carry and travel with my 50mm and the weight difference was enough of a difference in favor of the 1.4GM. Can't go wrong with either.
@@SilatShooter thanks for the input. I think I’ll just have to buy the 1.4 too and do a side by side
The 50mm 1.4 gm feels like my 24mm 1.4 gm. Very light and forget its there.
Yeah, it’s impressive how close to the 1.2 it is and yet so compact, truly amazing piece of glass.
@@florinG yes the 1.2 is just a hair faster, and bokeh is just a tad more bokelicious.
Great video. Thank you!
Thanks👍
Great review and 👍
A great review. I've watched other reviews of the same lenses, but this one's the best.
Thanks mate, appreciate it 👌
Thanks that helped me decide👍
Glad I could help
I went for F1.2 and going to keep the lens on my camera for one whole week. Then will see the result 🙂
Good choice, I’m sure you’ll love it 👍
1:51: 1.4 has MFD 1.41 not 1.1
Great video thank you
Thanks for watching!👍
My 50mm f1.4GM is made in Japan 😅 is that normal?
I’ve never come across one that was, all my ones are Thailand except my 135 which is made in China. It should be normal after all Sony is a Japanese company. As far as I know a great part of their products are manufactured in Thailand now as they moved production from China, but also in Japan of course.
I going to buy a used
F/1.2
You’ll love it ✌️
Awesome
Thanks 👍
Good
Thanks 👍
✌...
The f1. 2 seems better but heavier 😅
They’re both great probably the 1.4 better for video. I was struggling to get the 1.2 balanced on the gimbal 😅.
@@florinG on what gimbal? did you balance it in the end?
Everyone seems to complain about its weight but it’s lighter then both the Cannon and Nikon’s 1.2’s.
Of course.. 50mm f1.2 very good…
direct sunshine can kill or give damage yo camera sensor
Hi, thanks for that. From my experience it requires long exposure to sunlight so that the camera lens will act like a magnifying glass. Otherwise taking video/photographs of the sun won’t yield any damage, thanks👍
A GM lens, with such a proper price tag, and made in a communist power, not aceptable Sony, that’s a big NO THANKS
Relax! Look around you, everything is made in China.
I’m sure they’re really broken up about your wacked stance
I am confused about ur comment, i think ur IQ is higher than a hamster.