she quite clearly has been heavily prepped for the interview, she answers every question instantly, without any time to think about what she is about to say.
Pathological liars are like this. You can clearly hear her contradict herself numerous times. Even if you were to confront those contradictions they often deny they said that despite evidence.
I've surely never done it but 41,000 divided by 720 (2yrs) is about 50ish emails a day. That's not too far fetched when you break it down. She's so quick to respond.. is she even listening to him or just saying no no no to everything. "No I never sent an email" a minute later "maybe 10 emails" "No I never sent him a letter" a minute later "yeah one email" "We only met 2 or 3 times" but you went to one of his shows, told him the reindeer story you were "friends" and you wrote him 10 emails, responded on his Twitter a dozen times and wrote him a letter... doesn't add up because that's a LOT after meeting someone 3 times. Richard Gadd clearly has emotional issues but she's also clearly a liar and I believe she went overboard & potentially was a stalker!
I think it’s still far fetched because she wasn’t getting replies to her average of 50 emails a day and the other half of the day she was around him in real life and didn’t need to email 😅
2 things I found ironic. 1. She mentions she never been to his house yet in the show he pulled open a drawer and saw multiple phones so he knew about that. 2. In the show she tells him to “get a job” just like later in the interview Just peculiar
I can’t get enough of this woman. She’s an incredible liar and actress. Not even the tiniest slip in her mask. Like she’s so good she’s making me question if this WAS all a hoax.
Idk farther in when he starts to really put some pressure on hee, she really starts slipping up and getting frustrated and caught up in her own contradictions
That pub was Amy Winehouses local n Kelly Osbourne has said that the pub would let them have everything for free, drinks, food, they even had keys to the pub. So the Hollyarms or whatever it is called gave away free drinks & food. So another lie by Fiona.
Why didn't Piers research her criminal history. Thats pretty easy to find out. She said she's never been convicted and jailed of any crime. Why didn't Piers do his research BEFORE the interview and he could have told her she's lying if that were the case. This is a very bad interview.
I know nothing of the Netflix series so this is all new to me. I find her very clear & articulate indeed…. Very calm too…. She’s emphatic. Imagine if she is lying brilliant convincing performance.
People of her mental state are confident. They can lie convincingly and live in denial. They can suck you in easily. They are dangerous. Articulously has nothing to do with it.
She's exactly like he describes her... 😮 she seems angry for the fact he was raped because she was so in love that she never imagined that he was suffering her abuse that much... 😢
Don’t believe her. And she would have hundred percent watched the show. The way she knew all there ages and even piers. She’s been digging for info again.
She hasnt seen it and knows little about it but keeps referencing things and saying oh someone told me and a friend's daighter did watch it and tell me this happened etc
She has got sociological issues, which was pointed out, and Mr Gadd did feel.sorry for her and kept the friendship going, sooo she's not gonna back down now😂
Oh look another female trying to defend the indefensible with "whataboutme" "but men...." literally neither of them are ok but stop trying to deflect from women taking accountability for once in your whole gender.
She says that she essentially barely knew him, talked to him only a handful of times, basically just knew him as a barman that she bantered with...but: - She admits she went to one comedy show. Why would she do that for a random barman that served her a handful of times? - Why would she be messaging a random barman that occasionally serves her, like at all, unless you considered them as your friend? - She immediately tries to paint Gadd out as crazy, deranged, deluded, liar etc...but if you barely know the guy, and you're insistent you're not 'Martha'...then how would you know? How can you possibly make that judgement if you barely knew this man? - She constantly tries to insult Gadd's character even though she says she barely knew him? Suddenly she thinks she's 'slept with way more people' than him? How could you even know that or make that assessment if you barely knew the guy? She attacks him saying to "get a real job" as though he hasn't made millions as an actor and comedian...and she's very interested in the money, outright asking how much he's made from this whole thing. - There are loads of inconsistencies in everything she says, and she's quick to defend and word vomit a bunch of irrelevant information the moment Piers tries to essentially call her out on her inconsistencies. - No normal person has 6 different emails and more than 3 phones.
It’s SO like ‘Martha’ to be coming forward!!! She hasn’t changed 😂 you KNOW she watched the show. She’s lying. Also, Fiona is even smarter than she’s portrayed to be. This makes her a better liar, and much more dangerous. Update: after watching the whole interview and paying full attention, she’s not smart and she’s a terrible liar. But still dangerous. lol.
You can just tell she's lying by her body language also she's talking so much extra stuff instead of being direct; which is another tactic a liar will use to twist the fault.
She also can’t concede ANYTHING which is always a red flag. ‘I didn’t speak to him. He interrupted me, which is rude’ ‘I haven’t seen the actress’, ‘I don’t drink alcohol’, ‘it would be impossible to look through a window’ (wtf?) ‘the actress doesn’t even sound Scottish’… Uber- denial on overdrive.
her previous name is Muir, you can google articles that have been written about her and what she did to people in the past. especially, check what she did to Laura Wray. Also, in two instances she said about the emails and voicemails, "even if that was true", means that is true. SHE DID SEND THAT WHOLE EMAILS AND VOICEMAILS. the fact she answers rapidly, the fact she tweets a lot that I couldn't scroll to her past years tweets, the fact that she tweets a "stranger/ someone she didn't know well" 18 tweets, one letter, 10 messages, met him 6 times, went to his comedy show once (if at all, because she tweeted recommending people to go watch him) means she liked his shows, the fact he knows about her babyreindeer, the fact that they got into jokes of "the curtains", the fact she told Piers "no" for the question of "do you challenge Gadd for the number of emails", and the fact she was running from the idea of "doing the lie detector" TELLS SHE'S LYING
Well the actress did a damn good job of portrayingher. I can't believe a word that comes out of her mouth. How did she manage to get a degree when she throws out childish retorts when faced with an uncomfortable question? Imagine if she had got into parliament!
I’ve dealt with psychopaths twice in my life and this woman acts exactly like them, masters at lying right off the bet as they were doing their whole life…
Richard Gadd has said the real Martha never went to prison as he didn’t want to subject a mentally ill person to prison, so I don’t know Piers is asking if that bit happened because it’s public knowledge it didn’t.
She changed her story a lot. She says she never emailed him. Then she said well we were friends so it was banter. Then she says again she never contacted him then says well it wasn’t 41,000. She says she never went to one of his shows, but then says well I might have went to one. Ma’am, she needs to get her story together smh
"we were friends" to "my impression was he was all out for himself, wanted to control that bar, very inarticulate, very full of himself" then why would you become friends? Then she goes back to saying that they were never friends? uh huh.
If the actress portrayed her so well (i havent watched it) then it must mean that Gadd spent a LOT of time with her (by being stalked). How else could they be so similar 🤔
"My non-existent boyfriend is a lawyer oh wait, he's not. Neither of us are.... "I could never send 40,000 emails but I CAN find the time to post 40,000 facebook messages a day"..... 6 email addresses.... "Martha the sequel"? hmmmm. Also WHY can't such a "highly intelligent", A-grade law student spell / type a single coherent tweet / email / text? sadly, people like Fiona / Martha create so many new stories that they forget the truth and believe only what they want to hear.
How did Piers allowed himself to get into this interview without fact-proofing, at least a background check, at least public record ones. Piers has disappointed me so much, what is the porpoise here? Extremely poor journalism
@@juliejohnson5908I rather believe no one without proof. They are both a bit delulu. I wouldn't be surprised for them to be in cahoots for fame. He's done his movie, coming up next will be Martha's movie, both making millions on the back of their reputation. These people's brain don't work normally 🤣
@@aussies30 do you think she didn't? The tweets are still there. She just basically outed herself. She's contradicting herself. Did we watch the same interview? 🤯
She just keeps lying. Fist she says she only met him 2 or 3 times, barely knew him.. then later she sent him 10 emails. Who sends a stranger 10 emails. She is sooooo full of shit. Sent from moi iPhone
The fact she lied about Facebook and watching the show. There’s pictures of her watching the show on Facebook and she was posting about the interview for weeks until it happened and is still talking about it…. Like what…
She constantly contradicts herself. She said near the beginning of the interview that the reason she had emailed him 18 times and saw his show was that they were friends, even though at the beginning, she claimed she only met him two or three times. Then around 46 minutes she says they weren’t friends at all. But somehow he knew about the baby reindeer toy that she had as a child? That isn’t the kind of thing you tell a general acquaintance. The things she says about her childhood also match what is in the show, but she claims they weren’t friends, so how would he know those things? It’s also very strange that she claims the thing about hanging her curtains was a joke. If so, the things she said to him were creepy. She uses narcissistic tactics, like claiming that her so-called current lawyer boyfriend, and all of the professionals she knows, think the whole thing is crazy. Narcissists do this to try to bring more credibility to what they’re saying. She has multiple phones and 5-6 email addresses, which is downright bizarre. She has changed her name. She accuses anyone who’s had a problem with her of being crazy. She claims at the start that it’s obvious the show isn’t about her, because none of the things referenced match her behaviour towards him, and then continues for the next half hour to talk about suing him and Netflix because they made the show about her. she keeps claiming to know nothing about the show, but seems to know intricate details about it while claiming it’s something that other people have told her. She’s making things up on the fly and clearly isn’t concerned about consistency. It would be interesting to see her defamation claim go to court because they would tear shreds off her arguments. She also seems unsure whether or not she sent 41,000 emails, which means that she sent a hell of a lot. It’s quite strange that she would claim all of these things on Camera when they are so easily provable.
What about the person that Martha stalked before him?. The one with the disabled child he was framed for abusing ....Was that made up? If so then what else was made up?
She knows a lot about the actors and interviewer down to his age and his own convictions and where the actor is from but hasn’t watched the show. She knew from the title baby reindeer but only saw him about 3 times?
Is there any listening going on in this interview? They're LITERALLY both talking over each other, desperate to respond. SO horribly done but very eye opening. She's nuts
![Piers Morgan (Baby Reindeer Discussion) On Lorraine [14.05.2024]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JqjqtdThnV0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Piers Morgan (Baby Reindeer Discussion) On Lorraine [14.05.2024]](/img/tr.png)
Can we just give a shout out to Jessica Gunning for how well she played as Martha ❤
She is nuts and will now make a fortune
Sent from my iPhone
wel playyd
Sent from my iphoen
😂😂😂😂😂 sent from my iPhone 👏👏👏
Iphone
this comment is amazing
She said “I’ve never seen Martha” (the actress) then immediately talks about her hair color and age 😂
They showed her the clip…
Aye she got the colour wrong but
No she was talking about the well known actress
she quite clearly has been heavily prepped for the interview, she answers every question instantly, without any time to think about what she is about to say.
Or Maybe... Just Maybe ... He did exagerate the story to be more dramatical! Its never all black and all White...
A sociopath is like a chameleon. Always knows what to say so that appear in good light or as the victim.
@GLENC0C0 i Said a Little.... I mean we dont ever know for sure...
This is what pathological liars do. Lies come so easily to them, just rolls off the tongue.
Pathological liars are like this. You can clearly hear her contradict herself numerous times. Even if you were to confront those contradictions they often deny they said that despite evidence.
"Are you challenging him to reveal his evidence" "Noooo!" @54:38
"i don't know many people with 6 e-mail addresses"
"you don't know many people thennn"
LMAOOOO
Why would you regret going into the bar so much if you barely knew him..
Sent from my iPhone
😂😂😂😂 sent from I phone
Omg the rapid face change at 18:39 when he responded to her comment is wild!!
“Well, I don’t mean to flatter you or not flatter you…”
“🤣😐🤨😠”
Watch out Piers, you will be her next target. 🎯
Fiona, show us your iphone!
she doesnt have an iphone?
She immediately knew she was a year younger than Piers. Thats creepy. Shows the extent of prep shes done.
How many relationships ? More than Richard Gadd. Weird answer and then backed down .
I've surely never done it but 41,000 divided by 720 (2yrs) is about 50ish emails a day. That's not too far fetched when you break it down.
She's so quick to respond.. is she even listening to him or just saying no no no to everything.
"No I never sent an email" a minute later "maybe 10 emails"
"No I never sent him a letter" a minute later "yeah one email"
"We only met 2 or 3 times" but you went to one of his shows, told him the reindeer story you were "friends" and you wrote him 10 emails, responded on his Twitter a dozen times and wrote him a letter... doesn't add up because that's a LOT after meeting someone 3 times.
Richard Gadd clearly has emotional issues but she's also clearly a liar and I believe she went overboard & potentially was a stalker!
I think it’s still far fetched because she wasn’t getting replies to her average of 50 emails a day and the other half of the day she was around him in real life and didn’t need to email 😅
2 things I found ironic. 1. She mentions she never been to his house yet in the show he pulled open a drawer and saw multiple phones so he knew about that.
2. In the show she tells him to “get a job” just like later in the interview
Just peculiar
This woman scares me
Sent from my Xiaomi
😂😂
So she didn't watch this but there was alleged assault at the canal
I can’t get enough of this woman. She’s an incredible liar and actress. Not even the tiniest slip in her mask. Like she’s so good she’s making me question if this WAS all a hoax.
Idk farther in when he starts to really put some pressure on hee, she really starts slipping up and getting frustrated and caught up in her own contradictions
Everything aside, the court room scene is extremely emotional and heartbreaking, especially after knowing what reindeer meant to her. :(
34:43 never watched anything of Piers Morgan's before this but he seems to be a talented and effective interviewer (when he lets people speak)
indeed
She looks exactly like the actress! LOL I think she did it. She probably believes her own lies also.
Wow she sounds just like Martha lol
First she said she met him only 3 times then said 5 to 6 she’s definitely lying and did everything he said 🤣🤣
That pub was Amy Winehouses local n Kelly Osbourne has said that the pub would let them have everything for free, drinks, food, they even had keys to the pub. So the Hollyarms or whatever it is called gave away free drinks & food. So another lie by Fiona.
Baby Reindeer Season 2 ?
can’t get over her gasping
And her ‘mmmmmm mmhmmmmmm’’s😑
I just can't get through this because of my dislike for Piers Morgan.
Why didn't Piers research her criminal history. Thats pretty easy to find out. She said she's never been convicted and jailed of any crime. Why didn't Piers do his research BEFORE the interview and he could have told her she's lying if that were the case. This is a very bad interview.
I know nothing of the Netflix series so this is all new to me.
I find her very clear & articulate indeed…. Very calm too…. She’s emphatic.
Imagine if she is lying brilliant convincing performance.
Martha?
Is it...? oh love... I feel for you. It's not. It's REALLY NOT.
People of her mental state are confident. They can lie convincingly and live in denial. They can suck you in easily. They are dangerous. Articulously has nothing to do with it.
0 emails, then 1 email, then 10 emails.
That's a Susan Boyal moment right there - and not in a good way
She's exactly like he describes her... 😮 she seems angry for the fact he was raped because she was so in love that she never imagined that he was suffering her abuse that much... 😢
So the fact that she doesn’t drink alcohol is also true then
She definetly did th8s. Ppl who believe her clearly are off their rockers
“Mmmm” “mmmmm”
You can tell she has had to explain herself most of her life.
Sent from myy iPhone
Don’t believe her. And she would have hundred percent watched the show. The way she knew all there ages and even piers. She’s been digging for info again.
30:02 killed me 😂
She hasnt seen it and knows little about it but keeps referencing things and saying oh someone told me and a friend's daighter did watch it and tell me this happened etc
She has got sociological issues, which was pointed out, and Mr Gadd did feel.sorry for her and kept the friendship going, sooo she's not gonna back down now😂
Wouldn’t be nice to see in the Next SAW horror movie Fiona having a lesson?🤪😢🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
If it's true it can all be proven via paper trail. It's that simple
I watched the show and I left feeling bad for Martha, after watching this I feel bad for Fiona. I wish her the best and I hope she gets some peace.
Josh says he is mrs reindeer
I can understand 2 emails. Work and Friends/family life. but 6 emails
She sounds like she believes all the lies as they’re coming out of her mouth. Exactly as the character was portrayed.
She says exactly what Martha would say though 😅😂
Why is everyone obsessing with Fiona and not talking about the rape and the rapist
Oh look another female trying to defend the indefensible with "whataboutme" "but men...." literally neither of them are ok but stop trying to deflect from women taking accountability for once in your whole gender.
Isn’t it still an unidentified person
fr
Netflix protects the man
@@booksteaphd1613 no, richard wants to protect the man, he didn't even want y'all to know about fiona.
Pierce shouldn't have given her the water
Sent from my iPhone
Thats the best comment and also scary a bit
😂
Lol
How did you spell iPhone correctly but not Piers 😂
She says that she essentially barely knew him, talked to him only a handful of times, basically just knew him as a barman that she bantered with...but:
- She admits she went to one comedy show. Why would she do that for a random barman that served her a handful of times?
- Why would she be messaging a random barman that occasionally serves her, like at all, unless you considered them as your friend?
- She immediately tries to paint Gadd out as crazy, deranged, deluded, liar etc...but if you barely know the guy, and you're insistent you're not 'Martha'...then how would you know? How can you possibly make that judgement if you barely knew this man?
- She constantly tries to insult Gadd's character even though she says she barely knew him? Suddenly she thinks she's 'slept with way more people' than him? How could you even know that or make that assessment if you barely knew the guy? She attacks him saying to "get a real job" as though he hasn't made millions as an actor and comedian...and she's very interested in the money, outright asking how much he's made from this whole thing.
- There are loads of inconsistencies in everything she says, and she's quick to defend and word vomit a bunch of irrelevant information the moment Piers tries to essentially call her out on her inconsistencies.
- No normal person has 6 different emails and more than 3 phones.
👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏
That summarizes very well
lol I have a ton of emails but I never remember my passwords so I make a new one
Now she will stalk Piers 😂😂
That what I was thinking
I’m 58, a year younger than you….. Piers: 😳
One can only hope haha
Seems like she already did.
Already has it seems. Knew his age lol
"was he ever your friend"
she goes: NO
later....
"10 emails is a lot for someone we don't know"
she goes: "but we were all friends"
"I have 4 or 6 phones im not sure" also " I have a photographic memory"
Maybe the best comment here
Wonder where she sent the one letter she acknowledges sending if she didn’t know where he lived…
It said it was sent to the comedy club
She sent it recorded delivery to the theatre
She knew Piers exact age ! She is such a stalker
i thought that was suss too LMAO
I thought I was the only who caught that lol😂
Knows where the actors live, knows the in relationships they’re in…. She knows everything 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I just went to see a comedian tonight and looked him up. I don't see anything wrong with that.
Martha didn’t act crazy enough in the show, Fiona is actually nuts
I think it's because it tries to show the way the protagonist saw her
You can see her mask slipping as the interview progresses.
It’s SO like ‘Martha’ to be coming forward!!! She hasn’t changed 😂 you KNOW she watched the show. She’s lying. Also, Fiona is even smarter than she’s portrayed to be. This makes her a better liar, and much more dangerous.
Update: after watching the whole interview and paying full attention, she’s not smart and she’s a terrible liar. But still dangerous. lol.
Was just about to ask which of all the inconsistencies made you think her smart when I read the edit😭
You can just tell she's lying by her body language also she's talking so much extra stuff instead of being direct; which is another tactic a liar will use to twist the fault.
I fully agree with u!
She also can’t concede ANYTHING which is always a red flag. ‘I didn’t speak to him. He interrupted me, which is rude’ ‘I haven’t seen the actress’, ‘I don’t drink alcohol’, ‘it would be impossible to look through a window’ (wtf?) ‘the actress doesn’t even sound Scottish’… Uber- denial on overdrive.
Yep, little white lies and a really long example of one..
@@susandeoliveiraShe said it would be impossible to look through a window on the 7th floor, which is fairly accurate.
@@badofcheese Oh ok. That makes more sense.
Well Fiona, as you advised I made up my own mind and I can't believe a word you said.
Fiona about Jessica - the actress who plays her: She doesn’t even sound Scottish! Piers: No! She’s English. She’s an actress ….. 😅😂 22:01
Also she had said before that the actress was from Glasgow! hahah
Sent from my Iphone
@@sceptrus oh yeah well remembered hahaha! Snt from my iphne
Piers refers to them as both being Scottish before this
@@MrEminemhe means her and the character I thought
her previous name is Muir, you can google articles that have been written about her and what she did to people in the past. especially, check what she did to Laura Wray. Also, in two instances she said about the emails and voicemails, "even if that was true", means that is true. SHE DID SEND THAT WHOLE EMAILS AND VOICEMAILS. the fact she answers rapidly, the fact she tweets a lot that I couldn't scroll to her past years tweets, the fact that she tweets a "stranger/ someone she didn't know well" 18 tweets, one letter, 10 messages, met him 6 times, went to his comedy show once (if at all, because she tweeted recommending people to go watch him) means she liked his shows, the fact he knows about her babyreindeer, the fact that they got into jokes of "the curtains", the fact she told Piers "no" for the question of "do you challenge Gadd for the number of emails", and the fact she was running from the idea of "doing the lie detector" TELLS SHE'S LYING
She put herself forward as being this person. This is another way for her to get attention
If it wasn't her why would Richard Gadd not just come out and say so?
And trying to squeeze some money 💰 into her pocket the conniving woman.
8:58 I’ve never seen the actress, proceed to say where the actress is from, her hair color, her age.
It’s the pause before she remembered to look like she was thinking about the court dates. It’s a massive act and it’s very obvious
my man gave her water… big mistake.
Sent from my iPhone
😂
I love how she immediately answered yes to being in love with him and then changed her answer to no.😂😂😂
I though that but watching it back I think she said piers
She said "piers....come on..." Not "yes..come on". Would've been amazing if she had said yes though haha
Well the actress did a damn good job of portrayingher. I can't believe a word that comes out of her mouth. How did she manage to get a degree when she throws out childish retorts when faced with an uncomfortable question? Imagine if she had got into parliament!
Have you seen college students nowadays? A bunch of childish degenerates. So I'd say it's quite believable
Omg lying through her teeth, it’s awkward to watch. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
This whole thing is so sad. There are so many walking wounded in this world. I feel for both of them.
I literally just looked at myself in the mirror and thought. I have done crazy things. Not close to this extent but anyway...
I'm jumping on the bandwagon. Because we want drama to deter from our own shortcomings.
I feel more bad for him. He was stalked and assaulted.
I’ve dealt with psychopaths twice in my life and this woman acts exactly like them, masters at lying right off the bet as they were doing their whole life…
Right!
Richard Gadd has said the real Martha never went to prison as he didn’t want to subject a mentally ill person to prison, so I don’t know Piers is asking if that bit happened because it’s public knowledge it didn’t.
He's probably trying to gauge her reactions to what he knows is fiction
@@tamzinnnn Another woman defending a psycho woman. How suprising....
this woman has lost contact with reality........and cannot comprehend that stuff can be tracked down and proved
In the beginning she said she met him 2 or 3 times, then at the end she says 5 or 6😂
She changed her story a lot. She says she never emailed him. Then she said well we were friends so it was banter. Then she says again she never contacted him then says well it wasn’t 41,000. She says she never went to one of his shows, but then says well I might have went to one.
Ma’am, she needs to get her story together smh
"we were friends" to "my impression was he was all out for himself, wanted to control that bar, very inarticulate, very full of himself" then why would you become friends? Then she goes back to saying that they were never friends? uh huh.
She’s sat outside piers home now !
Sent from my iPhone
If the actress portrayed her so well (i havent watched it) then it must mean that Gadd spent a LOT of time with her (by being stalked). How else could they be so similar 🤔
It's as though she is making a veiled threat to Piers noting how much she knows about HIM...be careful Mr Morgan
"My non-existent boyfriend is a lawyer oh wait, he's not. Neither of us are.... "I could never send 40,000 emails but I CAN find the time to post 40,000 facebook messages a day"..... 6 email addresses.... "Martha the sequel"? hmmmm. Also WHY can't such a "highly intelligent", A-grade law student spell / type a single coherent tweet / email / text? sadly, people like Fiona / Martha create so many new stories that they forget the truth and believe only what they want to hear.
The production/casting crews over at "Celeb Big Brother" and "I'm a Celeb..." will be foaming at the mouth over this interview!
I had to pause the video to look if anyone commented that she started to count in her head if the numbers were right 😂
same here!🤣
Me too!😂
I she says she doesnt get how someone could send 4100 emails, but she posts on her facebook 30 times a day 😅
Not her eye roll of working out the court dates 😂
Her drinking water confirmed it
Omg yes tell tale sign of body language she lies so she drinks
How did Piers allowed himself to get into this interview without fact-proofing, at least a background check, at least public record ones. Piers has disappointed me so much, what is the porpoise here? Extremely poor journalism
@@juliejohnson5908I rather believe no one without proof. They are both a bit delulu. I wouldn't be surprised for them to be in cahoots for fame. He's done his movie, coming up next will be Martha's movie, both making millions on the back of their reputation. These people's brain don't work normally 🤣
@@juliejohnson5908 have you seen the emails? How do you know? Or are you just parroting back a narrative?
Piers Morgan fact checking ?! He isn't a journalist never has been.
@@aussies30 do you think she didn't? The tweets are still there. She just basically outed herself. She's contradicting herself. Did we watch the same interview? 🤯
Because it's not a trial. It's an interview
"I have a photographic memory"
"I don't remember"
She just keeps lying. Fist she says she only met him 2 or 3 times, barely knew him.. then later she sent him 10 emails. Who sends a stranger 10 emails. She is sooooo full of shit.
Sent from moi iPhone
The fact she lied about Facebook and watching the show.
There’s pictures of her watching the show on Facebook and she was posting about the interview for weeks until it happened and is still talking about it…. Like what…
The weird noise she makes under her breath is creepy.
Look at her manipulating the opportunity to try and get attention from him still.
Sent from iPhone
She constantly contradicts herself. She said near the beginning of the interview that the reason she had emailed him 18 times and saw his show was that they were friends, even though at the beginning, she claimed she only met him two or three times. Then around 46 minutes she says they weren’t friends at all. But somehow he knew about the baby reindeer toy that she had as a child? That isn’t the kind of thing you tell a general acquaintance. The things she says about her childhood also match what is in the show, but she claims they weren’t friends, so how would he know those things? It’s also very strange that she claims the thing about hanging her curtains was a joke. If so, the things she said to him were creepy.
She uses narcissistic tactics, like claiming that her so-called current lawyer boyfriend, and all of the professionals she knows, think the whole thing is crazy. Narcissists do this to try to bring more credibility to what they’re saying.
She has multiple phones and 5-6 email addresses, which is downright bizarre. She has changed her name. She accuses anyone who’s had a problem with her of being crazy. She claims at the start that it’s obvious the show isn’t about her, because none of the things referenced match her behaviour towards him, and then continues for the next half hour to talk about suing him and Netflix because they made the show about her.
she keeps claiming to know nothing about the show, but seems to know intricate details about it while claiming it’s something that other people have told her. She’s making things up on the fly and clearly isn’t concerned about consistency. It would be interesting to see her defamation claim go to court because they would tear shreds off her arguments. She also seems unsure whether or not she sent 41,000 emails, which means that she sent a hell of a lot. It’s quite strange that she would claim all of these things on Camera when they are so easily provable.
She also says “untrue facts”…facts are true, love 😂
😂, thanks for your intake and analysis. 👏
The knowledge of a childhood toy really drives it home for me.
Why were there so many spelling mistakes in ur emails, Fiona ? That’s the question that intrigues me .
What about the person that Martha stalked before him?. The one with the disabled child he was framed for abusing ....Was that made up? If so then what else was made up?
She’s still on Facebook. Still posting
She knows a lot about the actors and interviewer down to his age and his own convictions and where the actor is from but hasn’t watched the show.
She knew from the title baby reindeer but only saw him about 3 times?
Open mouth Inhale gasp count=scale broken.
Whether she’s “Martha” or not, she’s still got some problems
Is there any listening going on in this interview? They're LITERALLY both talking over each other, desperate to respond. SO horribly done but very eye opening. She's nuts
She is not particularly bright. Does she get the concept of an actor
Right off the bat when she said I'm a year younger than YOU... agghhhhhh