How to 'Get Started' with Dux-Soup

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 11

  • @theeightiesarebackofficial
    @theeightiesarebackofficial 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should also create short videos for each topics. Like less than 3mins for each of them. It will be easier to get back to something we forgot.😀

    • @DuxSoup
      @DuxSoup  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the feedback!
      The Dux-Soup website has a Knowledge base full of questions and support documents to help you use the tool. support.dux-soup.com/
      If you can't find what you're looking for, or would like to know more about a topic we haven't covered do let us know: info@dux-soup.com

  • @DebraAJason
    @DebraAJason 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do those statistics come from on your "Why Automate?" slide and are these numbers up to date (I ask because as of May 2022, LI has more than 830 million members)?

    • @DuxSoup
      @DuxSoup  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Debra, the figures change regularly. To take a look at the latest numbers go to about.linkedin.com/.

    • @DebraAJason
      @DebraAJason 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DuxSoup Yes, I know they change a lot. That’s where I got that 830 million statistic. I’m curious about the other stats that you have on that slide as I don’t see them on “about LinkedIn”

    • @DuxSoup
      @DuxSoup  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Debra,
      The slides are intended to give a high level view that we are dealing with a platform on a huge scale, rather than a detailed analysis, since figures do vary. The data comes from various sources. Take a look at these articles if you'd like to see more of the detail... www.omnicoreagency.com/linkedin-statistics/ and blog.hootsuite.com/linkedin-statistics-business/#:~:text=16.2%25%20of%20US%20LinkedIn%20users,in%20to%20the%20platform%20daily. findstack.com/linkedin-statistics/

    • @DebraAJason
      @DebraAJason 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DuxSoup Thanks!

    • @Mikepickn
      @Mikepickn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      830 million is definitely more than the 700million they said so they were in fact correct