Its funny how the house and property really look nothing like the real thing. And in real life the property was a lot more secluded. The gate on this property appears to be very close to what seems like a fairly main road. The real Cielo house required driving up a very long narrow road from the main road. That road is still there but has more neighbors than Sharon and Roman had back then.
On it now stands a huge mansion occupied by producer of Full House, Jeff Franklin. The real house at the end of Cielo drive was situated on a hill at Benedict Canyon, overlooking Los Angeles.
@@angienoexiste I’m well aware the original Tate house (actually Altobelli house) was torn down years ago. My comment is comparing that original house where the crimes occurred versus the property and house used in the movie. Yes the one used in the movie is suitable for the purpose of the plot. I was simply pointing out the significant difference, and that the movie version doesn’t quite show how isolated the original house was.
And if they did that, without any real neighbors, there's no end to the movie, which is intended as historical fantasy not documentary-like recreation.
@@justinmj6586 I’m not saying they should have been more accurate. I was just commenting on how I find the difference interesting. That said, in real life they actually did have neighbors, homes the Manson crew had to drive/walk past in order to get to the property and back, similar to Rick Dalton’s house in the movie. Neighbors were reported to have heard gunshots, and there were reports of excessive dog barking, and the sound of voices yelling for help.
To the complainers: It's makes no budgetary sense to totally re-create the Tate house for the 4 ppl who care that much. It makes no plot sense to this particular movie to have the house as isolated as the actual Tate house. The movie depends heavily on Tate and DiCaprio being reasonably seen adjacent neighbors.
This isn't Sharon Tate's house. Her house was torn down in 1993 and it's at the end of Cielo Drive. This is just the nothing/random house that Tarantino used for that movie about her. It's also in some video game, too. But this is NOT Sharon Tate/Roman Polanski's home where she, Jay Sebring, Voytek Frykowski and Abigail Folger were murdered. Waste of time.
It’s a real movie inspired by true events, retold within a fictional narrative and outcome. Also, it’s a very real neighborhood in Los Angeles. Studio City in the Valley to be more exact.
![[안방1열 풀캠4K] 베이비몬스터 'FOREVER' (BABYMONSTER FullCam)│@SBS Inkigayo 240707](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_2HL-ogzzBU/mqdefault.jpg)
Its the house from once upon time in Hollywood
You picked up on that huh?
Cielo drive 10050 in fiction. ❤❤❤❤
It's not the Sharon Tate house. Not even close. It is a movie house. But I love the movie.
Somebody please call Scott Michaels
It's sad seeing apart of history being removed but not forgotten
Its funny how the house and property really look nothing like the real thing. And in real life the property was a lot more secluded. The gate on this property appears to be very close to what seems like a fairly main road. The real Cielo house required driving up a very long narrow road from the main road. That road is still there but has more neighbors than Sharon and Roman had back then.
On it now stands a huge mansion occupied by producer of Full House, Jeff Franklin. The real house at the end of Cielo drive was situated on a hill at Benedict Canyon, overlooking Los Angeles.
tbf the real house has been demolished and this road is slightly similar, enough for the audience to get the impression of cielo drive
@@angienoexiste I’m well aware the original Tate house (actually Altobelli house) was torn down years ago. My comment is comparing that original house where the crimes occurred versus the property and house used in the movie. Yes the one used in the movie is suitable for the purpose of the plot. I was simply pointing out the significant difference, and that the movie version doesn’t quite show how isolated the original house was.
And if they did that, without any real neighbors, there's no end to the movie, which is intended as historical fantasy not documentary-like recreation.
@@justinmj6586 I’m not saying they should have been more accurate. I was just commenting on how I find the difference interesting. That said, in real life they actually did have neighbors, homes the Manson crew had to drive/walk past in order to get to the property and back, similar to Rick Dalton’s house in the movie. Neighbors were reported to have heard gunshots, and there were reports of excessive dog barking, and the sound of voices yelling for help.
To the complainers:
It's makes no budgetary sense to totally re-create the Tate house for the 4 ppl who care that much.
It makes no plot sense to this particular movie to have the house as isolated as the actual Tate house. The movie depends heavily on Tate and DiCaprio being reasonably seen adjacent neighbors.
Where is part 2?
real house was torn down long time ago
1993
@@IanP1963 It was actually 1994 the house was torn down.
this is the movie house, not the real location on cielo
This isn't Sharon Tate's house. Her house was torn down in 1993 and it's at the end of Cielo Drive. This is just the nothing/random house that Tarantino used for that movie about her. It's also in some video game, too. But this is NOT Sharon Tate/Roman Polanski's home where she, Jay Sebring, Voytek Frykowski and Abigail Folger were murdered. Waste of time.
Hence it says the ‘Sharon Tate’ house
It's not the house!
She’s showing them the house from the movie not the actual cielo drive location
Thanks Capt. Obvious.
Waste of time? It was used in the movie. Some actually find movie locations interesing.
Wow
Interesting
Fake movie fake neighborhood.
It’s a real movie inspired by true events, retold within a fictional narrative and outcome. Also, it’s a very real neighborhood in Los Angeles. Studio City in the Valley to be more exact.
Who is this woman talking ???
Possibly the owner.
What??(??🤔 Her house was torn down
It’s the filming location for once upon a Time in Hollywood. It’s not the real house
Not this house but the real Sharon Tate house in 1994.
Does, Trent Reznor still own this house ?
this isnt the real house, its the movie house
Trent Reznor hasn’t had anything to do with the original property (which this is not) for decades.