There is a common saying in arabic : "arabic is the key to knowledge". If anyone wants to learn arabic. Dr. Imran Hamza is an amazing teacher who teaches for free. His videos are on TH-cam.
((ذلك فضل الله يؤتيه من يشاء والله ذو الفضل العظيم......)) ((......That is the bounty of Allah which He gives to whom He wills, and Allah is the possessor of great bounty)) (57:21)
Abdulhakim Ganya akhee it’s from the sunnah to make dua for the individual you’re praising by saying ‘Allahuma barik’ oh Allah increase him& bless him in that which amazes you.
Overall, the lecture was balanced. I appreciate the attempt to be objective during the main part of the lecture. Unfortunately, a few statements were made at the end which were problematic. Imam Malik was known for staying in Madinah. I'm pretty sure he travelled less than Abu Hanifa. Also, the speaker repeated the same silly claim that many hadith biased people have stated about Abu Hanifa - that he is weak in hadith. This stems from people not knowing Hanafi usul. There are several usul based reasons why Hanafi rulings differ from the opinions of other schools on some issues. One of the major reasons is that in the Hanafi school, a solitary hadith can't restrict the meaning of a mutawattir text, such as the Quran or a mutawattir hadith. This results in the Hanafi school not relying on solitary hadiths that some of the other schools rely on. This is why, to give one example, the Hanafis say prayer is valid without reciting the Fatiha, because the hadith that says there is no prayer without the Fatiha isn't mutawattir. And there is a Quranic ayah that says, "Recite what is easy for your from the Quran." The mutawattir Quran is a stronger evidence than a solitary hadith. So while the Hanafi school says we should recite the fatiha because of the hadith, and it is sinful not to recite it, they also say that the fatiha isn't a pillar of the prayer, because the Quran tells us we can recite whatever is easy for us, which has been interpreted to mean at least one ayah of Quran. This is a brief example of how Hanafis deal with hadiths differently than some of the other schools. They know the hadith, they just weigh it differently. So to say Abu Hanifa was unaware of the hadiths on the topic is a lie. If you look in the Hanafi texts, the hadiths that critics of the school claim Abu Hanifa didn't know are dealt with. The speaker in the video openly admitted he didn't know much about the Hanafi school, and he only studied one text, Mukhatasar al-Qudoori (and I'm skeptical that he studied it thoroughly, cover to cover), so it is no surprise that he is ignorant of many of these facts. This requires a deeper study of the school to understand properly, something he hasn't taken the time to do. And the Hanafi school has a distinct method for authenticating hadiths that is different from the Shafi'i methodology popularized in mustalaha al-hadith texts such as al-Bayquniyya and Nukhbatul Fikr. This is another reason for the difference of opinion that you sometimes see when comparing the Hanafi school to others. In summary, Abu Hanifa knew the relevant hadiths that serve as the basis for fiqh rulings, however, he often dealt with them differently than the other madhabs. This slander that he was weak in hadith is an ahl al-Hadith bias that came about largely due to people not understanding Hanafi usul. If you study Hanafi fiqh and usul in more depth, you will see how they address all of the hadiths that critics claim they are ignorant of.
Slm I will request the Sheikh to take this statement back that Abu Hanifa was dhaeef in Hadith. I can accept if he said that hadith was not what he engaged with like how say Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanba didl. However he was a thiqa. You can read alilal al-sagheer of Imam Tirmizi where Imam Tirmizi quotes Imam Abu Hanifa to tadheef of a person. If he himself was not a thiqa and week in hadith why would he quote him as ref. The reality is Abu Hanifa was too strict in narrating hadith therefore we have very few ahadith narrated from him. You might not list him as a muhaddith as you would list Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal but you cannot say he was dhaeef in hadith. If he engaged with hadith and he made mistakes then what the sheikh said would be correct.
Mashallah great talk. Just one point, Ustaad you mentioned Imam Abu Hanifa Rahimullah was weak in Hadith. However, mine and your understanding of someone being 'weak' in hadith is very different from what the Masters of hadith in the salaf termed as 'weak'. Your failure to define this and to clarify this point is to do injustice to the Imam. Many of the Salafi brothers, swear at Imam Abu Hanifa and falsely claim he only new 5 hadith. Hence after your excellent talk, i'm sad to see that you didn't clarify this point.
All those who criticized Imam Abu Hanifa came after him. What did his contemporaries say about him? Was he muhadith? Was he a pharmacist who store medicine or was a doctor who has very few medications but knew what every medicine could treat?
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته ، Three from The Salaf that prayed all night: .Abu Rayhaan رضي الله عنه .Ajradah Al-Amiyyah رحمها الله تعالى .The Servant Of Ali Ibn Bakkaar رحمهما الله تعالى (Might be much more والله اعلم)
Asalaamu alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakaatuhu ustadh. You mentioned you have covered sharh us sunnah muzani... where can I find these videos as I'm trying to complete the 10 books in the 10 classes you told us to master. Thanks
An entire lecture of praising the imam and all people can see is the dhaeef part. Really sad. Maybe ustadh didn't word it the way you wanted it that doesn't make this speech any less good
This brother is not qualify to do class on madhab he is strongly against or knows about. Abu hanafi was not weak in Hadith, people knew more Hadith like imam Maliki. Giving the time of Kufa Hadith was fabricated that’s why his madhab take Hadith differently than the other madhab. There is many other reason as well
As salaamu alaikum akhi Hasan wa Ramadan mubarak aydan. Abdur Rahman studied as a youth in a Hanafi Islamic school in the UK. This is referenced from his biography video.
so whats the purpose of these, to teach the students about the madhahib so they can pull people away from them to the "haqq" of salafiyyah???? seems like thats whats up
Praying behind any Muslim is permissible unless they have committed Kufr. Imām Muslim was not a Muqallid, nor a Mujtahid Mutlaq, he was of Ahlul Hadith, and would weigh up the views of the Mujtahideen before taking a view. Imām al-Bukhari رحمه الله & Imam Abu Dawūd رحمه الله however were both Mujtahideen Mutlaq. Following an Imām in his Usul to organise your Fiqh approach is fine, and not condemned. To take every single view of an Imām or Madhab is haram for the Mujtahideen & the Students of Knowledge who can weigh up evidences. For the lay people - i.e. us - we have no Madhab. Our Madhab is of the Mufti we are asking a fatwa from. To properly be upon a Madhab, you need to be at a certain level of knowledge, which most Madhab followers are not at. Imām Ibn al-Qayyim رحمه الله said: "Indeed the comnon person cannot have a madhab (school of jurisprudential thought), even if he thinks he does. Rather the common person has no madhab at all, because the madhab will be for the one who is able to research to a certain level & understand evidence...and knows the ruling & sayings of his Imām. As for the one who is unable to do any of that, but merely says 'I am a Shafi'ī' or 'I am a Hanbalī' etc. Then he does not become that just by saying so, just as would be the case if he said 'I am a religious scholar' or 'I am a scholar of grammar', then he does not become that just by saying so." - I'lām ul-Muwaqqi'een, 4/261
Ustadh said studying via one of the 4 Madhā'hib is actually a good & very easy way to gain Fiqh of the Deen. Did you even watch the videos before this one? (They are called Introduction to Fiqh). He simply stated how it is not harām (so he does not condemn it as you mistakenly assume) and at the same time, it is not obligatory (as some Madhab fanaticists falsely claim).
@@zain5929 Of course he did the Tabien/Tabi Tabien were his teachers including Jaffar As Sadiqq thats where he took from. What did you think that Abu Hanifa pulled the knowledge out of his pocket? But if by your statement your implying that this is evidence for us, also, not to follow a mathab then by the same reasoning you should not read Bukhari, Muslim or Ibn Kathir, or Ibn Qayyum because the Prophet (saas) and Abu Hanifa didn't take form those imams nor read their compilations (for obvious reasons). So be consistent with your logic. Don't forget, that not following a mathab is a mathab. Also remember that just because you claim to be a Salafi doesn't make you a Salafi.
Ahki u shouldn’t even be following an imaam. Your methodology is already flawed. If that man was RasulAllah s.a.w then gladly follow him. The methodology of the the HAQ is to follow the correct authentic accurate teachings with authentic tic contextual evidences not to blindfoldely follow one specific Imaam!
wow - ustadh i advise you to ignore the social media drama and keep producing gems like this
There is a common saying in arabic : "arabic is the key to knowledge".
If anyone wants to learn arabic.
Dr. Imran Hamza is an amazing teacher who teaches for free.
His videos are on TH-cam.
Always amazed at his recollection of books and their authors in multitudes
I can hardly finish a small treatise... But these books are monsters
You can do it dear brother. Don't give up. May Allah give us strength.
((ذلك فضل الله يؤتيه من يشاء والله ذو الفضل العظيم......))
((......That is the bounty of Allah which He gives to whom He wills, and Allah is the possessor of great bounty)) (57:21)
Abdulhakim Ganya akhee it’s from the sunnah to make dua for the individual you’re praising by saying ‘Allahuma barik’ oh Allah increase him& bless him in that which amazes you.
Overall, the lecture was balanced. I appreciate the attempt to be objective during the main part of the lecture. Unfortunately, a few statements were made at the end which were problematic.
Imam Malik was known for staying in Madinah. I'm pretty sure he travelled less than Abu Hanifa.
Also, the speaker repeated the same silly claim that many hadith biased people have stated about Abu Hanifa - that he is weak in hadith. This stems from people not knowing Hanafi usul. There are several usul based reasons why Hanafi rulings differ from the opinions of other schools on some issues. One of the major reasons is that in the Hanafi school, a solitary hadith can't restrict the meaning of a mutawattir text, such as the Quran or a mutawattir hadith. This results in the Hanafi school not relying on solitary hadiths that some of the other schools rely on.
This is why, to give one example, the Hanafis say prayer is valid without reciting the Fatiha, because the hadith that says there is no prayer without the Fatiha isn't mutawattir. And there is a Quranic ayah that says, "Recite what is easy for your from the Quran." The mutawattir Quran is a stronger evidence than a solitary hadith. So while the Hanafi school says we should recite the fatiha because of the hadith, and it is sinful not to recite it, they also say that the fatiha isn't a pillar of the prayer, because the Quran tells us we can recite whatever is easy for us, which has been interpreted to mean at least one ayah of Quran.
This is a brief example of how Hanafis deal with hadiths differently than some of the other schools. They know the hadith, they just weigh it differently. So to say Abu Hanifa was unaware of the hadiths on the topic is a lie.
If you look in the Hanafi texts, the hadiths that critics of the school claim Abu Hanifa didn't know are dealt with. The speaker in the video openly admitted he didn't know much about the Hanafi school, and he only studied one text, Mukhatasar al-Qudoori (and I'm skeptical that he studied it thoroughly, cover to cover), so it is no surprise that he is ignorant of many of these facts. This requires a deeper study of the school to understand properly, something he hasn't taken the time to do.
And the Hanafi school has a distinct method for authenticating hadiths that is different from the Shafi'i methodology popularized in mustalaha al-hadith texts such as al-Bayquniyya and Nukhbatul Fikr. This is another reason for the difference of opinion that you sometimes see when comparing the Hanafi school to others.
In summary, Abu Hanifa knew the relevant hadiths that serve as the basis for fiqh rulings, however, he often dealt with them differently than the other madhabs. This slander that he was weak in hadith is an ahl al-Hadith bias that came about largely due to people not understanding Hanafi usul. If you study Hanafi fiqh and usul in more depth, you will see how they address all of the hadiths that critics claim they are ignorant of.
Beautiful lecture
May Allah bless u ya ustadh.
ibnu Zooootaaaaaaa! In all serious Jazakallah khair sheikh .. this is so beneficial!
I guess it has made us remember the name lol
I love the way he pronounces the names 2.
very intensive for me. enjoyed the ending. nice and relaxed
بارك الله فيك شيخ جزاك الله خيرا
May Allah bless you, ustadh, Jazak-Allahu khair
Slm
I will request the Sheikh to take this statement back that Abu Hanifa was dhaeef in Hadith.
I can accept if he said that hadith was not what he engaged with like how say Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanba didl.
However he was a thiqa. You can read alilal al-sagheer of Imam Tirmizi where Imam Tirmizi quotes Imam Abu Hanifa to tadheef of a person. If he himself was not a thiqa and week in hadith why would he quote him as ref.
The reality is Abu Hanifa was too strict in narrating hadith therefore we have very few ahadith narrated from him. You might not list him as a muhaddith as you would list Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal but you cannot say he was dhaeef in hadith. If he engaged with hadith and he made mistakes then what the sheikh said would be correct.
Look at what his major student, Abu Yusuf said about him in Hadith. He was strong in fiqh but weak in Hadith. This is معروف
It’s so funny when Salafis say it so proudly “Abu Hanifa was weak in Hadith”. If Abu Hanifa is weak then who the hell was exactly strong?
@@ThePlugTrading where dud he say that. In which book did you read? Please let me know
Mashallah great talk. Just one point, Ustaad you mentioned Imam Abu Hanifa Rahimullah was weak in Hadith. However, mine and your understanding of someone being 'weak' in hadith is very different from what the Masters of hadith in the salaf termed as 'weak'. Your failure to define this and to clarify this point is to do injustice to the Imam.
Many of the Salafi brothers, swear at Imam Abu Hanifa and falsely claim he only new 5 hadith. Hence after your excellent talk, i'm sad to see that you didn't clarify this point.
All those who criticized Imam Abu Hanifa came after him. What did his contemporaries say about him? Was he muhadith? Was he a pharmacist who store medicine or was a doctor who has very few medications but knew what every medicine could treat?
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته ،
Three from The Salaf that prayed all night:
.Abu Rayhaan رضي الله عنه
.Ajradah Al-Amiyyah رحمها الله تعالى
.The Servant Of Ali Ibn Bakkaar رحمهما الله تعالى
(Might be much more والله اعلم)
Asalaamu alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakaatuhu ustadh. You mentioned you have covered sharh us sunnah muzani... where can I find these videos as I'm trying to complete the 10 books in the 10 classes you told us to master. Thanks
As Salaamu Alaikum. What are the 10 books the Ustadh has mentioned?
An entire lecture of praising the imam and all people can see is the dhaeef part. Really sad. Maybe ustadh didn't word it the way you wanted it that doesn't make this speech any less good
Assalamu alaykoem wa rahmatullah wa barakatuh is there a way to contact ustadh abdurrahman hassan barrakallahufikoem
This brother is not qualify to do class on madhab he is strongly against or knows about. Abu hanafi was not weak in Hadith, people knew more Hadith like imam Maliki. Giving the time of Kufa Hadith was fabricated that’s why his madhab take Hadith differently than the other madhab. There is many other reason as well
As salaamu alaikum akhi Hasan wa Ramadan mubarak aydan.
Abdur Rahman studied as a youth in a Hanafi Islamic school in the UK. This is referenced from his biography video.
Chiberia walikum salaam rahmattullah shakuran JazakAllah Khairan his opinion is bias based on the video it’s not accurate
هل الكتاب السير بفتح السين وسكون الياء او بكسر السين وفتح الياء؟
Sin kasra ya fatha
Why don’t followers of imam Abu hanifa do raful dain
Strangers it’s not mandatory and there is a Hadith to support hanafi position
And imam malik and ahlul madinah at the time of imam malik
Also ahlul kufa including sufyan at thawri
All imams have their the evidence which proves their point
so whats the purpose of these, to teach the students about the madhahib so they can pull people away from them to the "haqq" of salafiyyah???? seems like thats whats up
If we are wrong why you pray behind us. Don't try to confuse the ignorant people. Even imam Muslim and many others follow imam
Imam Abu hanifah didn't follow an imam
Praying behind any Muslim is permissible unless they have committed Kufr. Imām Muslim was not a Muqallid, nor a Mujtahid Mutlaq, he was of Ahlul Hadith, and would weigh up the views of the Mujtahideen before taking a view. Imām al-Bukhari رحمه الله & Imam Abu Dawūd رحمه الله however were both Mujtahideen Mutlaq. Following an Imām in his Usul to organise your Fiqh approach is fine, and not condemned. To take every single view of an Imām or Madhab is haram for the Mujtahideen & the Students of Knowledge who can weigh up evidences. For the lay people - i.e. us - we have no Madhab. Our Madhab is of the Mufti we are asking a fatwa from. To properly be upon a Madhab, you need to be at a certain level of knowledge, which most Madhab followers are not at.
Imām Ibn al-Qayyim رحمه الله said:
"Indeed the comnon person cannot have a madhab (school of jurisprudential thought), even if he thinks he does. Rather the common person has no madhab at all, because the madhab will be for the one who is able to research to a certain level & understand evidence...and knows the ruling & sayings of his Imām. As for the one who is unable to do any of that, but merely says 'I am a Shafi'ī' or 'I am a Hanbalī' etc. Then he does not become that just by saying so, just as would be the case if he said 'I am a religious scholar' or 'I am a scholar of grammar', then he does not become that just by saying so."
- I'lām ul-Muwaqqi'een, 4/261
Ustadh said studying via one of the 4 Madhā'hib is actually a good & very easy way to gain Fiqh of the Deen. Did you even watch the videos before this one? (They are called Introduction to Fiqh). He simply stated how it is not harām (so he does not condemn it as you mistakenly assume) and at the same time, it is not obligatory (as some Madhab fanaticists falsely claim).
@@zain5929
Of course he did the Tabien/Tabi Tabien were his teachers including Jaffar As Sadiqq thats where he took from. What did you think that Abu Hanifa pulled the knowledge out of his pocket?
But if by your statement your implying that this is evidence for us, also, not to follow a mathab then by the same reasoning you should not read Bukhari, Muslim or Ibn Kathir, or Ibn Qayyum because the Prophet (saas) and Abu Hanifa didn't take form those imams nor read their compilations (for obvious reasons).
So be consistent with your logic.
Don't forget, that not following a mathab is a mathab.
Also remember that just because you claim to be a Salafi doesn't make you a Salafi.
Imams including imam bukhari never condemned people who followed imams
Brother listen to the talk again he did not condemn anyone to follow imams.
@@karimshah8535 Neither did Rasimuddin condemn Ustadh Abdur Rahman
@@أبوشغل Read his other comment
Ahki u shouldn’t even be following an imaam. Your methodology is already flawed. If that man was RasulAllah s.a.w then gladly follow him. The methodology of the the HAQ is to follow the correct authentic accurate teachings with authentic tic contextual evidences not to blindfoldely follow one specific Imaam!
@@khoshalpashtoonmal1845 That's not how the madhabs work. They are different methodations of getting to a fatwa conclusion in Fiqh issues.