More to our Junk DNA than meets the eye | Jay W. SHIN | TEDxKobe

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
  • ジェイ・ウー・シン:ジャンクDNAはこれまで考えられていた以上に意味がある
    高校の科学の授業で、はじめてDNAやRNAの神秘に触れたJay W. SHIN。現在は理化学研究所が中心となってゲノムを解析する国際研究コンソーシアム「FANTOMプロジェクト」のリーダーとして活躍する。DNAのうち、遺伝子として有用性が確認されていなかった、98%近い領域の機能解明を目指す研究を通して、身近な問題にも気付きを与えてくれる。 Jay W. SHIN was first inspired by the mystery of biology in a science class when he was a high school student. Now, he is a leader of the FANTOM Project, an international consortium, where RIKEN is playing a central role to analyze the human genome. He gives us insights surrounding new discoveries through the functional analysis of 98% of DNA that has been recognized as ‘junk'. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx

ความคิดเห็น • 44

  • @tinlieu4696
    @tinlieu4696 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Best your team and efforts. Look forward to hearing more discoveries.

  • @davidsierra5312
    @davidsierra5312 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    That's God DNA that we all have inside. Search here on TH-cam for a video call nurse dies and God show her energy and DNA.

  • @ajaymandani4146
    @ajaymandani4146 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    is it possible that we have some kind of superpower that we don't know about :)

    • @cornhq
      @cornhq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes meditate on a daily basis and you will find that your mind is an extremely powerful entity.

  • @dontmatterrr
    @dontmatterrr ปีที่แล้ว +12

    God is located in our junk dna. 🙏

    • @loveforever17
      @loveforever17 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A NDE experiencer mentioned this.

    • @mcmanustony
      @mcmanustony ปีที่แล้ว

      Did that sound good in your head?

    • @BEAUBARDO
      @BEAUBARDO ปีที่แล้ว

  • @gregvisioninfosoft
    @gregvisioninfosoft ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For those who are aware of the Sumarian clay tablet story of 'The Book of Enki' this adds a small insight.

  • @victimofharassment7435
    @victimofharassment7435 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @miraclewade4466
    @miraclewade4466 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool

  • @TheSwordfish009
    @TheSwordfish009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    when in doubt... call it junk.

  • @gorritas1234
    @gorritas1234 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Human beings have the ability to correct/heal itself through the energy we were created with, the genome and it’s language we operate from has the power to correct and rewrite whatever we need to be better, to heal, to understand more, it all comes down to realizing what is in you, how to use it, with a catch, it operates out of believe, our creator has endowed us with this ability/power, unfortunately people focus on the wrong areas in their life and get not to enjoy the full spectrum of this life, other beings long to have a physical body only few get to experience this, it’s a privilege to experience this, the richest you’ll ever get to be in this physical world, enjoy it, learn from it and above all explore, the infinite is waiting for you to discover it!!! Want to learn more, reach out to me,,, thanks!!

  • @tljbrandt9035
    @tljbrandt9035 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All life's answers

  • @tukushtacos2518
    @tukushtacos2518 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I felt the same when i first heard it too, i felt like since we didn't understand it that the ego of science decided to call it junk instead of saying we're not advanced enough to know yet

    • @mcmanustony
      @mcmanustony ปีที่แล้ว

      The narrative is wrong. It has NOTHING to do with "ego". The speaker claims that non coding DNA was dismissed as "junk". This is false. Large amounts of ncDNA have been known for decades on end to be functional- telomeres and centromeres for example, there are many many more.
      Much of the rest is transcribed into products with no function. Other regions- 14,000 of them- are remnants of genes that were functional in ancestor species- the gluo-gene for example. Some mammals synthesis vitamin C. Humans do not- despite having the relevant gene. It is junk.
      The human genome is largely junk- and the efforts of scientists like the speaker have only enlarged the functional part by a fraction of a percentage.

    • @TheSwordfish009
      @TheSwordfish009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      when in doubt... call it junk

  • @Ivan_Lopez1
    @Ivan_Lopez1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    R.I.P. Kobe

  • @notavailable4891
    @notavailable4891 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remember when we called it junk because evolution predicts there should be junk? Then when it turned out it wasn't junk, it was okay cos evolution predicts there should be no junk? That was pretty silly.
    Isn't there a word for a theory which is able to predict mutually contradictory things?

  • @km-gn7hm
    @km-gn7hm ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't know that 97% of human genome information was still unknown.
    I wonder if the 97% of unexplained DNA information has the effect of gene expression due to the environment.
    If all the parts called junk DNA could be elucidated, it would be very useful for people's health.

  • @runewolf77
    @runewolf77 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yup. It's RNA!

  • @7DarkAngel
    @7DarkAngel 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What would happen if all or most of the DNA was coded ?

    • @zioslayerbear8592
      @zioslayerbear8592 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I wonder if they allready are ?
      And the only way to acces the information is true psykadelics ?!

    • @livinginthespirit407
      @livinginthespirit407 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Indoctrinates into T of E believism would shrug it off and continue to defend their theory as if their lives depended upon it.

    • @mcmanustony
      @mcmanustony ปีที่แล้ว

      @@livinginthespirit407 you appear not to have the faintest clue what you're talking about. What's that like?

    • @livinginthespirit407
      @livinginthespirit407 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mcmanustony I wouldn't know, perhaps you can enlighten me on how that feels for you. The atheistically driven Dawkinsian peddling of false and pseudoscientific propaganda that DNA was 98 % worthless evolutionary leftover junk has been exposed as a lie which hindered honest science in this area for decades. If you were willing, maybe you could learn something from this.

    • @mcmanustony
      @mcmanustony ปีที่แล้ว

      @@livinginthespirit407 "I wouldn't know, "- you should. You are here bumping your gums about evolutionary biology of which you have zero knowledge.

  • @dariusas204
    @dariusas204 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is God.

  • @gregvisioninfosoft
    @gregvisioninfosoft ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No part of the magnificant biological body is 'junk'. Its merely not understood. We know so little about all of the magic that causes us to exist.

  • @brandoncorrie472
    @brandoncorrie472 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm worried that you will simply overlook the significance of a non-coding rna simply because you can't observe anything detectable by your tools/senses. Sure it will get you part of the way, but I'm afraid it will lead to naive solutions because capitalism.

  • @rockynrobynbrand
    @rockynrobynbrand ปีที่แล้ว