Dravidianism & Dravidian politics explained in 6 minutes | David Frawley ji

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 มี.ค. 2021
  • Dravidianism & Dravidian politics explained in 6 minutes | David Frawley ji | The Festival of Bharat - Season 4
    SUPPORT US IN SECONDS
    www.citti.net/donate
    MORE CONTENT
    Browse The Festival of Bharat's TH-cam channel for more exciting content including exceptional talks on India by inspiring subject matter experts, artistes, scholars, change makers and public figures.
    All of our content is available at no cost, and with no premium subscriptions required. You can help us spread the word as far and wide as possible by sharing our videos, and subscribing to our channel at / thefestivalofbharat
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    Like us on Facebook @ / festivalbharat
    Follow us on Twitter @ / festivalbharat
    Join us on Instagram @ / festivalofbharat
    FULL VIDEOS
    Full versions of our videos are typically published on the @Citti Media channel a few weeks after the shorter cuts are published on this channel.
    #Dravidianism #Dravidian #Politics #India #History

ความคิดเห็น • 84

  • @crazycockatiel2982
    @crazycockatiel2982 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Dravidian is not Separatism it's against Social Injustice its against Self irrespect in the name of 4 Varna's it supports Feminism.

    • @venki3deditor
      @venki3deditor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      If we name the movement in other ways, they would support it. 'Dravidian' name is irritating for them.

    • @vanshstalin7917
      @vanshstalin7917 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dravidan movement is a christain funded movement led by Justice party

    • @venki3deditor
      @venki3deditor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vanshstalin7917 yeah maybe it's a myth but true

    • @spdude7267
      @spdude7267 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It is a separatist movement. Dravidians have asked a separate homeland from themselves during independence movements.

    • @GwyyshsbakIzjsbsbszjzjzjhh
      @GwyyshsbakIzjsbsbszjzjzjhh 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@spdude7267So what? Dravidians weren't Indians before. What is today Pakistan is a more legitimate part of India than this so called Dravida Nadu

  • @SantoshK.Mangalore
    @SantoshK.Mangalore 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    As always David Frawley gives us his best understanding of Indian historical truths.
    To cover a big topic in just 6 minutes is marvelous.

    • @odmizac
      @odmizac ปีที่แล้ว

      When you mix raisins with turd it's still turd .....

  • @rashmipriyadas1112
    @rashmipriyadas1112 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    🙏🏻🙏🏻Lots of respect..

  • @Saravanakandhanviews
    @Saravanakandhanviews ปีที่แล้ว +4

    4:20 Chola Dynasty🔥

  • @omnandita12
    @omnandita12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Oh my God bless you......this is needed. We must relearn our past properly

  • @indiacrazyfacts2574
    @indiacrazyfacts2574 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Right

  • @anupamab3
    @anupamab3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent!!!!!!!!!

  • @Saravanakandhanviews
    @Saravanakandhanviews ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Tamilnadu small state with moderate population. But 2nd largest GDP contributor only reason Dravidian party rule

    • @Thegamer-zd9el
      @Thegamer-zd9el 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Tamil Nadu is 2nd richest state in India not because of Dravidian parties but in spite of them.

    • @pruthvirajtarade5137
      @pruthvirajtarade5137 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No it's due to availablity of port

    • @user-hr4rj5mo2n
      @user-hr4rj5mo2n หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because of Coastal region and nature

  • @MrNalin1234
    @MrNalin1234 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good 👍

  • @nabajyotisikdar5785
    @nabajyotisikdar5785 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Subha Mastu ! Well said Dr, Frawley Sir !

  • @OLskewL
    @OLskewL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    There's a difference between no evidence, little evidence, and substantial evidence...but to be so quick to call something that has it's evidences inbetween 'little' and 'substantial' a 'myth' is actually quite 'telling' of the opposition's agenda as well.
    Very interesting. Everything the man explained could also be used to to support the narrative. I suppose you must question which paradigm you're in when you look at the evidences.

  • @Ashutosh0020
    @Ashutosh0020 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fully Agree, We should allow foreign powers to divide us, We are Hindus and Indian, that's all,

    • @patrick3504
      @patrick3504 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Hindu?? What hindu, kshatriya, behmana, shudra, vaishya?? Which one??

  • @TheKakamuka
    @TheKakamuka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @Samyu_N
    @Samyu_N ปีที่แล้ว +8

    All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident - German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer.
    Some people say "Aryan and Dravidian race is a complete hoax", but India have two distinct major linguistic group namely Indo-Aryan [Indo-European] and Dravidian Language group, namely Sanskrit and Tamil. Even though the word Dravidian coined only in later days, since it is used to represent a Distinct linguistic group. We say it as Aryan and Dravidian races namely Aryans and Ancient Tamils. So "Aryan and Dravidian race is NOT a hoax"
    In recent decades, the idea of an Aryan migration into India has been disputed by Indian scholars, who claim Indigenous Aryans scenarios [Only because they do NOT want to be identified as OUTSIDERS to India]. However, these alternate scenarios are rooted in traditional and religious views on Indian history and identity and are universally rejected in mainstream scholars.
    It is a UNIVERSALLY accepted scientific fact that "R1A1 DNA originates in EUROPE, not in India". R1a1 often called the Aryan gene has been linked to a number of tribes that had originated in the Caucasus region. Hittites who went to Babylon, Mittani that went to Turkey, Hyskos who went to Egypt, Italics, Dorians and others especially Aryas who went to ancient Iran and then to Afghanistan and India.
    There is NO evidence that the gene originated in ancient India and spread westwards. However, in India, people try to change the genetic origin of the Aryan-speakers in an upside down position [In Reverse Order].
    The country Name Iran itself means "Land of the Aryans" and Iranshahr. The very close relation between Iranian and Indo-Aryan groups has never been doubted. They share linguistic features to such a degree that Indo-Iranian is generally described as a distinct subgroup of Indo-European. The term Arya has been used by the Iranian people, as well as by the rulers and emperors of Iran, from the time of the Avesta.
    The well-attested Indo-Iranian languages are Vedic Sanskrit, Avestan and Old Persian. Sanskrit and Avestan are very closely related languages with exact grammatical principles and numerous cognates [Blood Relative]. You can find words which are exactly identical, like Sanskrit/Avestan naman (name), ushtra (camel) etc.
    The list of Vedic Sanskrit gods are - Indra, Varuna, Mitra, Soma, Rudra, Vishnu & Agni.
    The list of Mittani [Syria] gods are - Indra, Varuna, Mitra and Nasatyas (Ashvins)
    This proves that Vedic Sanskrit gods are similar to that of Mittani [Syria] gods. And Mittani language being older than Sanskrit proves that Rigveda originated in Syria / Iran and then moved to India.
    Language, literature, epics & poems evolves every century. In Vedic/Hindu literature, Asuras (Ahuras) are bad guys while Devas are heroes. In Zoroastrian/Persian literature, Ahuras (Asuras) are heroes while Daevas are the villains.
    When the Vedic Aryans moved further, they arrived in the Indian subcontinent they were faced by the native Dravidians, Dravidians that got conquered were placed as low caste in Vedic Aryan society. The Vedic Aryans continued to call their enemy as “Asuras", but the description of the Asuras changed to Dravidians (i e. present day south-Indians) with dark skin, large facial hair etc.
    This is another proof for Rigveda evolving in Syria / Iran [Persia] and moved to Indian sub-continent. Initially Asuras (Ahuras) were referring to Zoroastrian/Persian and in later days Asuras were used to refer Dravidians.
    We have all the proofs for Aryan invasion in Rig Veda itself. Dasyus were the people who lived in India when the Aryans arrived here. They were having a dark-skin and flat noses. Battles depicted in the R̥gveda are directly referring to Aryans migrating into India which is native land of dark skinned people Dravidians. Rig Veda - Dasa: 54 hymns and 63 verses and Dasyus: 65 hymns, 80 verses. The accounts of conflict between the Aryans and the Dasas and Dasyus are acknowledged in Rig Veda.
    Rig Veda describes that Dasas and Dasyus were people who do not perform sacrifices. Aryans had to fight with these people for land. The Aryans defeated them and did not treat them well. The Aryan chief who overpowered Dasyus were called dasyuhatya (slaughter of the dasyus) this is repeatedly mentioned in the Rig Veda.
    Read the following to know more on this same subject
    Aryan by Birth - Upper Caste Fair Skin NORTH Indian (Brahmin, Kshatriyas & Vaisyas)
    Dravidian by Birth - Lower caste Dark Skin Sudras & Paraiahs / Panchamas (Dalits / Tribes)
    Across the globe White people feel they are superior and enslave black people. That is the case in Africa and America too. Even in India even though we Indians had very old civilization then the British. The British people who came here for TRADE enslaved Indians. Same thing happened in Ancient India. Even though Dravidians had a OLDER Civilization, Aryans made them as Sudhras claiming white people are superior and black people are inferior.
    People living in Indian Sub-continent who are ALL fair in complexion have mostly Steppe land R1A1 genes in their DNA these people are basically Aryans. More than caste it is the Skin color which decides whether someone is Aryan or Dravidians. People living in Indian Sub-continent who are Dark in complexion have mostly South Asian Hunter Gatherer genes in their DNA these people are Dravidian [Tamils] basically.
    Tamils means all Sudras & Paraiahs / Panchamas (Dalits / Tribes) lived/living across Indian sub - continent. Even today, you can see dark skinned and pale dark-skinned people living across India in all places, they were all Tamils only in ancient India. "Justice H N Nagamohan Das Commission panel" says, Indian Vedic philosophy lead to social inequality and caste system, All these happened because of Brahmins, Upanishads, Manusrmiti, and epics like Mahabharata and Ramayana...” the commission said in its July 2020 report, which the BJP government formally accepted.
    The panel report also says that people belonging to Dravidian race resided in North India once upon a time. “Many foreign invaders such as ARYANS, Persians, Greeks, Huns, Turks, Mongolians, Europeans etc came and fought against local people. The rulers who won the war developed relations with local women and consequently emerged mixed races”
    About Kasthriyas, who ever had the courage and willpower conquered the land, for them even if they are from lower caste, Brhamins did NOT had any choice. So, Brahmins accepted who ever won the war as Kasthriyas except Muslim. Kasthriya Kings always married fair and good looking girls. So, Kasthriyas community have a mix of Upper caste and lower caste DNAs in them.
    Read the following facts about DNA Studies.
    Why R1A1 DNA originates in EUROPE, but not in India. why it is it not found or too less in percentage among South Indians ?
    Why M haplogroups DNA is NOT found in Upper caste Aryans or North Indians ? If found why so less ?
    If you have read Vedas there are lots and lots of mention about Horses, then why HORSES are not native to INDIA ?
    If Aryans lived in India 5,000 years back means, then why there were NO Horse seals in Harappan IVC sites ?
    Why copper hoard culture found only with Aryans, but not with Dravidians ?
    Why antenna swords found in Sinauli - India which belongs to BMAC - Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex ?
    Haplo M is found among 60% of modern day Indians. It is in every person from South. But here’s the main catch ! It’s only found in depressed classes of northern and tribal peoples of northern India. But, almost to zero to 1-4% among Higher caste Aryans or North Indians.
    Just like R1A1 not found in south in the same way south’s M groups are not found among R1A1 peoples of north.
    So, it is proved beyond doubt that "ALL upper caste Fair Skin North Indians are ALL ARYANS, and all lower caste Dark Skin Sudras & Paraiahs / Panchamas (Dalits / Tribes) are all Dravidians"

    • @amitmishra4709
      @amitmishra4709 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You are wrong and unaware about most aspects. Just remember don't spread this new division methodology.

    • @amitmishra4709
      @amitmishra4709 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Refer video of subramaniam swamy to rectify yourself

    • @Samyu_N
      @Samyu_N ปีที่แล้ว

      @@amitmishra4709 Only Subramaniam Swamy has to Rectify himself after reading the following OVERWHELMING PROOFS ..... Read
      The country Name Iran itself means "Land of the Aryans" and Iranshahr. The very close relation between Iranian and Indo-Aryan groups has never been doubted. They share linguistic features to such a degree that Indo-Iranian is generally described as a distinct subgroup of Indo-European. The term Arya has been used by the Iranian people, as well as by the rulers and emperors of Iran, from the time of the Avesta.
      The well-attested Indo-Iranian languages are Vedic Sanskrit, Avestan and Old Persian. Sanskrit and Avestan are very closely related languages with exact grammatical principles and numerous cognates [Blood Relative]. You can find words which are exactly identical, like Sanskrit/Avestan naman (name), ushtra (camel) etc.
      Language, literature, epics & poems evolves every century. In Vedic/Hindu literature, Asuras (Ahuras) are bad guys while Devas are heroes. In Zoroastrian/Persian literature, Ahuras (Asuras) are heroes while Daevas are the villains.
      When the Vedic Aryans moved further, they arrived in the Indian subcontinent they were faced by the native Dravidians, Dravidians that got conquered were placed as low caste in Vedic Aryan society. The Vedic Aryans continued to call the enemy as “Asuras", but the description of the Asuras changed to Dravidians (i e. present day south-Indians) with dark skin, large facial hair etc.
      This itself is a proof that Rigveda evolved in Persia i.e. present day Iran and moved to Indian sub-continent. Initially Asuras (Ahuras) were referring to Zoroastrian/Persian and in later days Asuras were used to refer Dravidians.
      We have all the proofs for Aryan invasion in Rig Veda itself. Dasyus were the people who lived in India when the Aryans arrived here. They were having a dark-skin and flat noses. Battles depicted in the R̥gveda are directly referring to Aryans migrating into India which is native land of dark skinned people Dravidians. Rig Veda - Dasa: 54 hymns and 63 verses and Dasyus: 65 hymns, 80 verses. The accounts of conflict between the Aryans and the Dasas and Dasyus are acknowledged in Rig Veda.
      Rig Veda describes that Dasas and Dasyus were people who do not perform sacrifices. Aryans had to fight with these people for land. The Aryans defeated them and did not treat them well. The Aryan chief who overpowered Dasyus were called dasyuhatya (slaughter of the dasyus) this is repeatedly mentioned in the Rig Veda.

    • @amitmishra4709
      @amitmishra4709 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Samyu_N north also have dark people and mix variety and Vedas will not tell you everything. If for a instance it is right. Doing politics with this type of division is also wrong. And if Asura were there.. then why so much of temples there in south why people worship then. Why taking English like mother tongue but feeling bad in taking Hindi . Double standards will be not tolerated.

    • @theindiangenius1602
      @theindiangenius1602 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​​​@@Samyu_N brother i am obc yadav or ahir i am shudra does north indian shudra are also Dravidian?? and the ancient language such as Pali which Buddha speak how did it originated??
      Why did south people has 20-30 percent Aryan genes
      Also it is proven that Dravidian came from Iran to India and engage with the first migrant people that come from Africa 70k year ago so why did then the people in India Valley region black if they were mix of Dravidian and native Indians

  • @porchelviramr4404
    @porchelviramr4404 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @great_ape6633
    @great_ape6633 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    NEW MEMBER FOR BJP, HOW MUCH DID HE RECEIVE FROM AMITSHAH?

  • @ghosthunter8664
    @ghosthunter8664 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    ,🙂💞

  • @nurulalrakib1083
    @nurulalrakib1083 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    তারা নিজেদের স্বাধীন করতে না পারলে, ভারতের কেন্দ্রীয় শাসন তাদের হাতে থাকে উচিত।

  • @Guitarista1992
    @Guitarista1992 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The Dravidian Model is about inclusive growth for all sections of society. Look at Tamil Nadu's Gross Enrolment Ratio, Doctor:Patient Ratio, Per Capita Income, Multidimensional poverty and compare it with other States. Then you'll know what the Dravidian Model stands for growth on the principles of equality and self-respect.

    • @Pawrfectjellybelly
      @Pawrfectjellybelly 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      But now it is used as seperatist criteria dividing north and south and denying union of india

  • @vigneshsubramanian2511
    @vigneshsubramanian2511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    It still largely prevails through South Indian cinema especially in Tamil industry. Politics rule Tamil film world and so actors like Vijay still spout out Dravidian nationalist messages. Even Rajini at one point did that, but he has stopped after he became spiritual.

    • @starrynight43451
      @starrynight43451 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can u suggest any movies

    • @vigneshsubramanian2511
      @vigneshsubramanian2511 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@starrynight43451 Watch Baba. It's a great movie and one of the least hinduphobic movies I've seen from India. There are sadly very few authentic pro Hindu flicks and Baba is one of them.

    • @2sangillis
      @2sangillis 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol what r u even saying

  • @ramakrishnansubbiyan1764
    @ramakrishnansubbiyan1764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Mr. Respect table sir.. learn 🇮🇳India👍.. It's million years culture... Not
    European.
    Your 👣people
    You must came Tamil nadu
    It's all about spritual💯 yes
    Chola.. Yes I like love you truth no one 👪✋stop..
    We are original 🕉️Hindus
    Nature🌿🍃 Israel🇮🇱
    Jewish✡️️ people👣 more
    Living South.. Kerala..
    Ma dras. 🥭Man+ go
    Strength💪 அம் + மா
    AM + MA
    MA+There
    We're is 💯💪 MA? Mother=MAthere.. 👉🥭💪

    • @DarkKnight-ly3qu
      @DarkKnight-ly3qu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      All the Hindus are one..whether from South or from North...please stay United
      Jay Shree Ram

    • @ramakrishnansubbiyan1764
      @ramakrishnansubbiyan1764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DarkKnight-ly3qu I 👨‍🍳❤agree👍....

    • @pxrkhali3363
      @pxrkhali3363 ปีที่แล้ว

      My friend did your keyboard have a stroke?

    • @kanamalai3146
      @kanamalai3146 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      dont forget, Name of india history is just 76 year.

  • @vaibhavkrupakar240
    @vaibhavkrupakar240 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Original aryans are from europe but that theory made no sense hence it became central asia

  • @rajendraraut841
    @rajendraraut841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Free tempals 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

    • @gohul19
      @gohul19 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You want free Tempons? Why? Can't you buy that in department stores? 🥴🤔

    • @siddhu5472
      @siddhu5472 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gohul19 he might have said free temples...

  • @yasminbiju231
    @yasminbiju231 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My daughter who was Aryan by skin colour became Dravidian after Sun exposure 😢

    • @plazmagaming2182
      @plazmagaming2182 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Are you dumb or something? You must be some sort of troll...

  • @vkhandelwal
    @vkhandelwal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lion,no

  • @beetlejuiceapril
    @beetlejuiceapril 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Funny to see these jokers discussing and portraying Dravidianism in bad light …….. Dravidianism is beyond their understanding…..😅😅😂😂😂

  • @tamilnetworks780
    @tamilnetworks780 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

  • @gadheroo
    @gadheroo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    You should change the name of your channel to 'Festival of sufferers of white saviour syndrome'. Can you seriosuly not find any non Indians who are not white????

    • @SantoshK.Mangalore
      @SantoshK.Mangalore 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      David Frawley has been an Indologist most probably since before you were born. He has studied Sanskrit and is a respected scholar. He stood against the Hegemony of the leftist who maliciously altered our true history. Truth is independent on ethnicity or colour of the skin.

    • @SantoshK.Mangalore
      @SantoshK.Mangalore 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Suggest you start your own channel and then see how you fare.

    • @indianmilitary
      @indianmilitary 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      gadheroo - There are white people who are more hindu than brown skinned hindus born in India. So, we should classify such white people as insiders and westernized hindus living in India as outsiders

    • @SantoshK.Mangalore
      @SantoshK.Mangalore 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Nationalist Socialist Party of India There are two tribal groups in Madhya Pradesh who have a DNA structure having an uncanny resemblance to a Brahmin community.

    •  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Nationalist Socialist Party of India in vedic era (except during last 1000 years)...someone's Varan depends on his profession.
      So you can easily guess who they are!!

  • @rajdeepvijayaraj4243
    @rajdeepvijayaraj4243 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hat saaley