How To Read Research Papers Effectively | Prof. David Stuckler
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มิ.ย. 2024
- In today's video I will be sharing the proven methods for reading scientific articles quickly and effectively. If you've beens struggling with your academic reading than this video will be a life saver!
📝Click the link to apply for a free 1-to-1 accelerator session: www.stucklerconsulting.com/
✨Join our Facebook group for exclusive live streams:
/ 961543657994330
Timestamps:
00:00 - Intro
01:01 - Understand your why
01:53 - The “bird’s-eye view” method
03:13 - The “swoop” method
04:43 - The “street view” method
06:01 - Understand that not all papers are written well
06:58 - What to do if you are still struggling
07:37 - Take a break
07:50 - The “rubber duck” method
👨🎓How to get top people in your field to invest in you and find effective mentors: pCNKZQyMgS...
📋How to write a systematic review:
• Video
🚀Follow me on IG for motivation:
/ fasttrackgrad - บันเทิง
i want to cry when you said it is ok to not really understand the reviews, don't fall into imposter syndrome, because I felt lost reading them sometimes :((
00:01 Learn the triple pass method to read a scientific article.
01:17 Understanding the purpose and goal of reading research papers is crucial.
02:25 Novices focus on verbatim details, experts read for the gist
03:43 Avoid reading research papers linearly from start to finish
04:58 Deeply analyzing research papers is crucial for effective understanding.
06:04 Reading research papers can be frustrating due to complex writing and lack of editing
07:21 Effective reading saves time and improves focus
08:35 Use the rubber duck method to simplify writing for better understanding
Crafted by Merlin AI.
i am amazed by your `start with why` mindset!! this is what we need to do in the first place but uni rarely teach
Thank you for this topic. I was searching for just this information for starting my YT channel summarizing research papers in the project management field.
You are such a great educator. Thank you very much.
Thank you! Amazingly useful information! ❤
Thanks for this really helpful video giving clear or concise strategies: what to see/take and what to ignore - time saver!!!
Perfect! I'll be showing my students asap!
1. know your way
2. birds-eye view
3. swoop
4. streets view
5. feynman method
Thank you for this much needed video.
Loved, thank you!
Thank you, Prof. Today I'm stuck, and your video suddenly appears on my YT, your video always helps me.
Triple pass. Excellent. Thanks
Thank you, quite helpful
Thanks very much sir actually i was very confuse to write a paper but because of your information i got a ideas god bless you sir
excellent, very encouraging
Wonderful tis. Thank you. 🙏🙏🙏
Practical advise, thank you
Excellent presentation....👍
Excellent advice. Thankyou so much
pleased to hear you got value from the training! let me know how you get on with applying the triple-pass to your reading
Thank you Prof...It's really helpful
Pleased to hear you’re getting value from it. Definitely join my Fb group FastTrackGrad for more training and support
Awesone video 👍🏽👍🏽
Your great Prof thank you and thanks TH-cam i can reach you
You are the best
I really like it
This saved my life ..😭
Thanks a lot for this. Recently I have been trying to read AI papers, and been doing linear reads (cause I thought that's what you're supposed to do.) Read a few, but I realized it's not sustainable. This on the other hand looks really applicable, I'll try that and hopefully it goes better. Thanks again!
You're welcome! Glad you found the video useful. Feel free to join my FB group if you need more support.
Is there any pros of undergraduate student reading article and trying to publish their articles? (I'm aiming for med and also some another path if first one doesn't go well).
This boy is genius
Thank you
Some paper are really a piece of torture indeed 😂
All well and good prof., but how do you know where "to swoop in"? Thanks
you have to define your 'why' - what do you need to extract? is it the theories used? the methods? various findings? that will determine where to look
Thank you Sir! @@profdavidstuckler
I did not understand the last method, what do I do in rubber duck method exactly? thank you
just keep it so simple a rubber duck could understand
How do I start writing a literature review of of a problem statement like"a study case on why there is an increase in default loans in savings and credits cooperative societies?
@@constancelecha6746 hey Constance - join my Fb group and let’s chat there directly. First step is to decide if you’re doing a systematic review or a traditional one, and then create a search strategy to define boundaries of what is in and out of your search
@@constancelecha6746 hey Constance definitely join my FB group so we can be in direct contact more easily - also just sent you an email :)
Preliminary Assessment:
Determine the reason for engaging with the article: Is it for reference, supporting an argument, conducting a systematic review, or critiquing?
Evaluate its relevance to your current task or research.
Three Reading Strategies:
1.Bird's Eye View:
-Quickly survey the content to ascertain its purpose and relevance.
-Assess if a detailed read is necessary to fulfill your objectives.
-Experts often aim to grasp the main points swiftly.
-Identify your purpose for reading and focus on extracting essential information.
2. Swoop Method:
-Dive deeper into the core arguments and debates during a second pass.
-Be discerning and efficient, focusing on crucial details rather than reading every word.
3. Street View Method:
-Engage deeply with the material when necessary, such as during peer review or when extracting specific information.
-Consider printing and highlighting relevant sections for deeper analysis.
Additional Advice:
-Recognize well-written papers to enhance your own writing skills.
-Emulate effective writing by employing the Rubber Duck Method: Simplify and clarify your writing by explaining it as if to a layperson, removing technical jargon.
I have a question: This method is only advisable though if you are reading peer reviewed papers, right? Intuitively I'd say this is enabling confirmation bias, isnt it? If one paper answers your "why", how many more to you scan until you are convinced you are not reading something "insular"? And when is it time to stop and think wether the conclusion they came to is based on appropriate methods?
If your ‘why’ is to perform a lit review, you’d follow our FastTrack method to read multiple papers until reaching ‘saturation’. Your search strategy would also be designed to avoid biases like confirmation bias, among others.
Definitely check out the lit review vid as it sounds like that is what you are trying to implement
Thank you for clarification, I'll definitively do that!
👍🏽
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
You are the best