i want to cry when you said it is ok to not really understand the reviews, don't fall into imposter syndrome, because I felt lost reading them sometimes :((
Preliminary Assessment: Determine the reason for engaging with the article: Is it for reference, supporting an argument, conducting a systematic review, or critiquing? Evaluate its relevance to your current task or research. Three Reading Strategies: 1.Bird's Eye View: -Quickly survey the content to ascertain its purpose and relevance. -Assess if a detailed read is necessary to fulfill your objectives. -Experts often aim to grasp the main points swiftly. -Identify your purpose for reading and focus on extracting essential information. 2. Swoop Method: -Dive deeper into the core arguments and debates during a second pass. -Be discerning and efficient, focusing on crucial details rather than reading every word. 3. Street View Method: -Engage deeply with the material when necessary, such as during peer review or when extracting specific information. -Consider printing and highlighting relevant sections for deeper analysis. Additional Advice: -Recognize well-written papers to enhance your own writing skills. -Emulate effective writing by employing the Rubber Duck Method: Simplify and clarify your writing by explaining it as if to a layperson, removing technical jargon.
00:01 Learn the triple pass method to read a scientific article. 01:17 Understanding the purpose and goal of reading research papers is crucial. 02:25 Novices focus on verbatim details, experts read for the gist 03:43 Avoid reading research papers linearly from start to finish 04:58 Deeply analyzing research papers is crucial for effective understanding. 06:04 Reading research papers can be frustrating due to complex writing and lack of editing 07:21 Effective reading saves time and improves focus 08:35 Use the rubber duck method to simplify writing for better understanding Crafted by Merlin AI.
I think a lot of people would and want to do this already and are aware this is more efficient. The reason they don't is: What if someone asks them "Did you read the entire paper?" If they say "no" their "credibility will go down". They also feel like they are doing something wrong and they should read every single sentence otherwise they are just faking it etc. At least that's what I feel.
Exactly that's what I feel... When reading just the main thing i feel that the person who wrote the rest of the part also did for some reason and may be the important point can lie in the part which I am escaping
You are super engaging. I thoroughly enjoyed watching/listening to you. I learned and was comforted. Intelligent and compassionate delivery. Thank you!
Pleased to hear you found it helpful! Definitely join my fb group if you’re getting value from our training. We have more longer form masterclasses and live workshops where you can even submit your questions and research for our direct feedback
Thank you for this topic. I was searching for just this information for starting my YT channel summarizing research papers in the project management field.
Pleased to hear you found it helpful! Definitely join my fb group if you’re getting value from our training. We have more longer form masterclasses and live workshops where you can even submit your questions and research for our direct feedback
Thank you for the tips. I am writing my proposal to as a requirement for my application for Doctrate. This is very helpful as English is my second language.
Thanks a lot for this. Recently I have been trying to read AI papers, and been doing linear reads (cause I thought that's what you're supposed to do.) Read a few, but I realized it's not sustainable. This on the other hand looks really applicable, I'll try that and hopefully it goes better. Thanks again!
Have you checked out scispace ? Our more recent AI reading video shares a very helpful tool which will save a ton of time on these poorly written tomes
Pleased to hear you found it helpful! Definitely join my fb group if you’re getting value from our training. We have more longer form masterclasses and live workshops
You’d want to set up a search strategy, with carefully crafted keywords. Googlescholar typically, and there are ways to get access. Join my fb group for more direct support
I have a question: This method is only advisable though if you are reading peer reviewed papers, right? Intuitively I'd say this is enabling confirmation bias, isnt it? If one paper answers your "why", how many more to you scan until you are convinced you are not reading something "insular"? And when is it time to stop and think wether the conclusion they came to is based on appropriate methods?
If your ‘why’ is to perform a lit review, you’d follow our FastTrack method to read multiple papers until reaching ‘saturation’. Your search strategy would also be designed to avoid biases like confirmation bias, among others. Definitely check out the lit review vid as it sounds like that is what you are trying to implement
How do I start writing a literature review of of a problem statement like"a study case on why there is an increase in default loans in savings and credits cooperative societies?
@@constancelecha6746 hey Constance - join my Fb group and let’s chat there directly. First step is to decide if you’re doing a systematic review or a traditional one, and then create a search strategy to define boundaries of what is in and out of your search
Is there any pros of undergraduate student reading article and trying to publish their articles? (I'm aiming for med and also some another path if first one doesn't go well).
"Why do universities not teach you this stuff?" Because they expect you to learn how to do this in high school, and high school expects you to learn how to do it at university.
![[MV] A leap of faith...ความเชื่อใจครั้งสุดท้าย (From "Petrichor the series")](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U1piZH2CNXA/mqdefault.jpg)
i want to cry when you said it is ok to not really understand the reviews, don't fall into imposter syndrome, because I felt lost reading them sometimes :((
Preliminary Assessment:
Determine the reason for engaging with the article: Is it for reference, supporting an argument, conducting a systematic review, or critiquing?
Evaluate its relevance to your current task or research.
Three Reading Strategies:
1.Bird's Eye View:
-Quickly survey the content to ascertain its purpose and relevance.
-Assess if a detailed read is necessary to fulfill your objectives.
-Experts often aim to grasp the main points swiftly.
-Identify your purpose for reading and focus on extracting essential information.
2. Swoop Method:
-Dive deeper into the core arguments and debates during a second pass.
-Be discerning and efficient, focusing on crucial details rather than reading every word.
3. Street View Method:
-Engage deeply with the material when necessary, such as during peer review or when extracting specific information.
-Consider printing and highlighting relevant sections for deeper analysis.
Additional Advice:
-Recognize well-written papers to enhance your own writing skills.
-Emulate effective writing by employing the Rubber Duck Method: Simplify and clarify your writing by explaining it as if to a layperson, removing technical jargon.
Sorry, I'm too late to realize you did summerise it
Thank you so much for summarizing this.
00:01 Learn the triple pass method to read a scientific article.
01:17 Understanding the purpose and goal of reading research papers is crucial.
02:25 Novices focus on verbatim details, experts read for the gist
03:43 Avoid reading research papers linearly from start to finish
04:58 Deeply analyzing research papers is crucial for effective understanding.
06:04 Reading research papers can be frustrating due to complex writing and lack of editing
07:21 Effective reading saves time and improves focus
08:35 Use the rubber duck method to simplify writing for better understanding
Crafted by Merlin AI.
I think a lot of people would and want to do this already and are aware this is more efficient. The reason they don't is: What if someone asks them "Did you read the entire paper?" If they say "no" their "credibility will go down". They also feel like they are doing something wrong and they should read every single sentence otherwise they are just faking it etc. At least that's what I feel.
Exactly that's what I feel... When reading just the main thing i feel that the person who wrote the rest of the part also did for some reason and may be the important point can lie in the part which I am escaping
i am amazed by your `start with why` mindset!! this is what we need to do in the first place but uni rarely teach
You are super engaging. I thoroughly enjoyed watching/listening to you. I learned and was comforted. Intelligent and compassionate delivery. Thank you!
Pleased to hear you found it helpful! Definitely join my fb group if you’re getting value from our training. We have more longer form masterclasses and live workshops where you can even submit your questions and research for our direct feedback
You are such a great educator. Thank you very much.
Thank you for this topic. I was searching for just this information for starting my YT channel summarizing research papers in the project management field.
Interesting guidance on how to read Research Papers effectively. Thanks for connecting.
Awesome video Prof. David! Any advice for systematic reviews ?
have you seen our step by step course? we have a whole playlist on systematic reviews on my channel and in my fb group! 😊
Thanks for this really helpful video giving clear or concise strategies: what to see/take and what to ignore - time saver!!!
Oh my! I needed this. Just to know I’m not alone! ❤
Perfect! I'll be showing my students asap!
One of the best and more useful video that i have ever watched! Thank you prof!
Pleased to hear you found it helpful! Definitely join my fb group if you’re getting value from our training. We have more longer form masterclasses and live workshops where you can even submit your questions and research for our direct feedback
Wonderful video! I wish I watched this video when I first started grad school (I already graduated 10+ years ago)
Thank you! Amazingly useful information! ❤
Thank you.
Thanks very much sir actually i was very confuse to write a paper but because of your information i got a ideas god bless you sir
Thank you for the tips. I am writing my proposal to as a requirement for my application for Doctrate. This is very helpful as English is my second language.
Hey me too can we have connections
Thank you, Prof. Today I'm stuck, and your video suddenly appears on my YT, your video always helps me.
This saved my life ..😭
Thanks a lot for this. Recently I have been trying to read AI papers, and been doing linear reads (cause I thought that's what you're supposed to do.) Read a few, but I realized it's not sustainable. This on the other hand looks really applicable, I'll try that and hopefully it goes better. Thanks again!
You're welcome! Glad you found the video useful. Feel free to join my FB group if you need more support.
Academic articles in english is killing my interest to actually learning and enjoying reading. Feels like staring at a blank paper
Have you checked out scispace ? Our more recent AI reading video shares a very helpful tool which will save a ton of time on these poorly written tomes
Triple pass. Excellent. Thanks
This boy is genius
Excellent advice. Thankyou so much
pleased to hear you got value from the training! let me know how you get on with applying the triple-pass to your reading
Your great Prof thank you and thanks TH-cam i can reach you
Excellent presentation....👍
Thank you so much
Pleased to hear you found it helpful! Definitely join my fb group if you’re getting value from our training. We have more longer form masterclasses and live workshops
My struggle is where to find papers to read most of them comes with price which is weird.
You’d want to set up a search strategy, with carefully crafted keywords.
Googlescholar typically, and there are ways to get access. Join my fb group for more direct support
How do you know what to “swoop” from the article ?
You need to have a clear plan for your paper or you’ll be reading aimlessly
This helped me a lot
Loved, thank you!
Thank you for this much needed video.
excellent, very encouraging
Practical advise, thank you
Saved my life♥️
Thank you Prof...It's really helpful
Pleased to hear you’re getting value from it. Definitely join my Fb group FastTrackGrad for more training and support
The rubber duck’s not a thing, I talk in my head when debugging, but I will talk aloud when it gets complex, if I’m tired, or I just need to focus.
All well and good prof., but how do you know where "to swoop in"? Thanks
you have to define your 'why' - what do you need to extract? is it the theories used? the methods? various findings? that will determine where to look
Thank you Sir! @@profdavidstuckler
I have a question: This method is only advisable though if you are reading peer reviewed papers, right? Intuitively I'd say this is enabling confirmation bias, isnt it? If one paper answers your "why", how many more to you scan until you are convinced you are not reading something "insular"? And when is it time to stop and think wether the conclusion they came to is based on appropriate methods?
If your ‘why’ is to perform a lit review, you’d follow our FastTrack method to read multiple papers until reaching ‘saturation’. Your search strategy would also be designed to avoid biases like confirmation bias, among others.
Definitely check out the lit review vid as it sounds like that is what you are trying to implement
Thank you for clarification, I'll definitively do that!
Wonderful tis. Thank you. 🙏🙏🙏
1. know your way
2. birds-eye view
3. swoop
4. streets view
5. feynman method
Awesone video 👍🏽👍🏽
Some paper are really a piece of torture indeed 😂
I really like it
I did not understand the last method, what do I do in rubber duck method exactly? thank you
just keep it so simple a rubber duck could understand
How do I start writing a literature review of of a problem statement like"a study case on why there is an increase in default loans in savings and credits cooperative societies?
@@constancelecha6746 hey Constance - join my Fb group and let’s chat there directly. First step is to decide if you’re doing a systematic review or a traditional one, and then create a search strategy to define boundaries of what is in and out of your search
@@constancelecha6746 hey Constance definitely join my FB group so we can be in direct contact more easily - also just sent you an email :)
Is there any pros of undergraduate student reading article and trying to publish their articles? (I'm aiming for med and also some another path if first one doesn't go well).
You are the best
The problem with this approach is that the person will not be able to differentiate between key ideas (Like Times square in New York vs London) 😅
His method is exactly how I surf the web.
Thank you, quite helpful
"Why do universities not teach you this stuff?"
Because they expect you to learn how to do this in high school, and high school expects you to learn how to do it at university.
Thank you
👍🏽
❤❤❤12/7/2024
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
No training Professor 😅
You are the best