If it got to tribunal, they would be asked to testify under oath. Would you want to risk lying under oath knowing there may be another party who could tell the truth? It’s a criminal offence.
@@Employment_with_Amythat’s when people claim that the other party is LYING. “Under oath” means nothing unless you have EVIDENCE, because people can and do lie, constantly.
Oh how I wish HR knew what we think of them and their fake job.
Not sure how they can be "absolutely screwed" unless there's some evidence of that conversation having happened.
If it got to tribunal, they would be asked to testify under oath. Would you want to risk lying under oath knowing there may be another party who could tell the truth? It’s a criminal offence.
@@Employment_with_Amythat’s when people claim that the other party is LYING.
“Under oath” means nothing unless you have EVIDENCE, because people can and do lie, constantly.