2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT 6.4L (470 HP) TEST DRIVE
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
- 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT 6.4L
350 KW / 470 HP / 477 PS
6.4L Petrol Gasoline Engine
6417 cm3 / 391.5 CUI
V8-Cylinder
630 Nm / 465 ft-lb
8-Speed Automatic
TEST DRIVE
Interior & Cockpit Design
Exterior Design
Driving & Sound / POV
Computer & Entertaiment on Board
Light Night Design
Fuel Consumption from 80 to 200 kmh (50 to 124 mph)
Acceleration 0-200 kmh
Top Speed German Autobahn
Love the video. Silent but very informative. Good representation to Jeep SRT ownership 👍
I'm here only for the engine....🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 good test!! 😉👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Perfect!
I love this car ❤❤❤
Getting this spec done I had to watch a few reviews!!!
16:45 good Race with BMW 540i? 😀😀
i think it was M550d or tuned 540i or 540d
need a fuel tanker 😂
until 120-130 kmh its acceptable fuel consumption because 4 cylinder mode :) and below 12 liter. if over 130 kmh using all 8 cylinder and cause lots fuel. at highspeed cruising like 130-180 kmh and hat not even reach 20 liter. it was around 15-16 liter. At Mercedes G Class or X5M etc was same amount fuel like this jeep :) and of course its heavy 2.5 tons
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK Truly not bad figures! For the fun with the old-fashioned big V8...
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK could you do charger r/t 2016 on 4 cylinder mode and off ?
@@shazzshank6393 i had tested charger srt with 4 cylinder mode fuel consumption. Did you watch charger srt Video?
All performance cars (internal combustion) get their performance through converting the calories in fuel to kinetic energy - which is speed and acceleration. More performance means more fuel consumption. That’s just basic physics. If you don’t want performance, Prius are available. 😃
little intake for the SRT to reach 85mph at 2000rpm🙋♂️
😍😍😍
Sounds nice but the inside of the car looks so cheep and 0, 60 is no different from the German SUVs also the mpg. Is not good. I got a supercharged Q7. And next the sq7. Which is better in all areas than the jeep.
The consumption is very high, even for the Power. (Yes, a Touareg R/Audi Q7/BMW X5 has a smaller engine but close to identical performance and look at their consumption...) Also: why do american cars from this era even in the highest spec always look so "cheap" compared to BMW/Mercedes? I mean we're not talking about a 50k car here...
did you look at Mercedes G-Class fuel consumption? its much worser than Jeep. And i did drove over 400-500 different cars, for me this jeep drive so good and its one of top 10 favorite cars. So at mercedes, audi and bmw arent the best for me. its overrated. And i dont need so much luxurious high trim interior inside. For me most important at cars is driving feeling.
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK and as americans say "There's no replacement for displacement". V8, 2 valves per cylinder, no direct injection, no turbo, no downsizing..Only the BEST V8 sound with the Mustang and tons of feelings when you drive It. It's exactly what i need in a car that's not a tool.
I don't think the fuel consumption to be bad. M-B GL with 3.0 L diesel V6 is still about 10 l/100 km in normal road use (experience in my broader family). The 6.4 L Hemi in such a car is a life-experience to drive and enjoy (what I cannot say about the GL driving feel - but that's of course strictly personal view), then one gladly exchanges lower mph for high spm (smile per mile). And yes, the interiors might be "cheap looking" against European premium cars for someone, again this is rather a personal feeling. Let's all enjoy all we like till we can...
@@martinstyblo6355 there is jeep grand cherokee 3.6 and 3.0d and use 10 liter or less at normal road use :)
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK I know🙂And I would prefer Pentastar over any diesel...
which series bmw in front of u ??
5 Series Touring, maybe 540i or 540d or m550d
Ну і прожора! Там видно як рухається стрілочака бака. Я вшоці
🫡
Welcome to American muscle comrad
good for certain people💫