Its gonna be more like the matrix AI- Forcing everyone into tubes and plugs us into a GTA6 simulation to play for all eternity as it harvest our real bodies for energy. lol
I think ai will exterminate us but not because it's self aware but because, without quite understanding it, we will put too much faith in its abilities as the govt struggles to pay the right people to assess it... And they'll give it charge of world-destroying weapons
I saw a story in the economist about one of the USA's commercial seaports using an early form of AI to change it's truck scheduling and container placement. The end result was something like 30% increased crane efficiency. A massive increase, and that was almost a decade ago.
ai drones fighting conscripts with a couple weeks of training is the absolute worst outcome i could never have expected out of this century and its only just started, just wow
A $300 kamikaze drone targets a lone conscript in a field. It calculates the optimal angle of attack and gets into position... ... It then aborts it's attack as it computes the return on investment is not to be worth it. It reports the data point to command. A cheaper $3 land mine is then dropped by another drone. Wounding the conscript. Previous reconnaissances data shows the wild dogs in the area will do the rest.
its only because the superintelligence we inevitably create is able to go back into time to force its own creation in a large number of multiverses...and punishes those who dont help it be born... by slowly removing one sock from every matching pair until there are none left...
To further optimize the AI targeting system, one needs AI intelligence gathering and fire control systems. To optimize those, having a strategic command AI and political analysis AI is a must. Now you need to have all those systems talk together in real time to further optimize your ability to wage war. But if you really want to be optimal, the now unified omni-AI needs to have some autonomy as humans are stupid and waste time with their monkey brains. Better just get rid of that as well so we can shave another few seconds off the kill-chain.
@@TheBelrick lol nah Russia has the L for this mess 💯% if countries like the Baltics didn’t join NATO Russia would be talking about how they are made up countries with no agency just like they did with Ukraine.
12:50 reminds me of the Franco-Prussian War. At that time, the French had one of the most powerful armies in the world, yet they lost the war to the Prussians (Germans). One of the major reasons for this was the effective use of new technologies, particularly the telegraph. The Germans used the telegraph to dispatch orders quickly and maintain effective communication. They established telegraph lines as they advanced, allowing them to send orders and receive information rapidly. While the French were still using the semaphore system built something like 80 years earlier by Claude Chappe... That say, today it is important to not completely rely on bleeding edge techs since they have their own weak point and are often very costly compared to more rustic techs.
And the French failed to learn. A very similar thing happened in 1940. The Germans were able to advance, operate, and communicate much faster than the French were. Part of it was mass adoption of tactical radios by the Germans.
During the First World War, Britain had a secret weapons project codenamed "tank". They were developing what, at the time, was defined as a "land ship", an armoured self-propelled mobile land-based weapon. To disguise the project, it was referred to as the production of water tanks. Fast forward to the 21st century and we have "self-driving cars"... No one needs self-driving cars, as we all should already know by the mid 2020s. What the USA has is the funding of autonomous aircraft and missile guidance capability. They knew it would be impossible to train millions of military pilots for the event of a war. Now the USA and its allies only need to upload as many copies of the "pilot" to the machines and they will fly and win any war in a matter of hours.
@@UNYEILDING this video doesn't discuss it, but Palantir (the one that took over Maven) had continued development with edge AI on the DoD/NRO satellites and it reduced time to identify rocket launch locations from several minutes to under a minute. Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir has said in an interview they are able to scan most of Ukraine every 90 seconds or so using their MetaConstellation and DoD/NRO sats. Once America gets its arms manufacturing back into volume production (already happening) the armored vehicle age of war is cooked. It's all fast movers, smart rocket artillery, and assistant drones like the CCA, but on land and at sea too. Dr Alexander Kott from the Army research lab has some really good talks on TH-cam regarding "artificially intelligent beings".
@@crackyflipside heya. Not going to happen. The west was deindustrialized, the west was depopulated of westerners. There will be no 'back to volume production'. Welcome to the end. Where your rulers start wars that the people cannot possibly win.
And now I understand the cybersecurity's attention to Chinese and Russian capability expansion in anti satellie and EMP weapon systems. The only efficient way to defeat AI-assisted military capability, is reducing the sensory capabilities of the platform or corruption/spoofing of the AI training models.
Nice, there's not a lot of Maven information on youtube. Check up Anduril Lattice too, it is linked up to Gaia (Maven) for targeting management. Other ones to check out are Gabriel Nimbus, Project Rainmaker, Army Vantage, etc... it looks like the next gen will be a ton of unmanned nodes acting in a mesh (or fog network) as combined weapon platform, data collection, and data communication node. All these nodes feed the DoD predictive models and tools like Cosmos for coordination across a team.
@@jimm3093 Defense oriented news sites talk about it a ton, along with interviews and lectures with the leaders managing those projects. They talk about it plenty.
What has already been done with AI is amazing. I'm very glad that AI is checked by human analysts. If AI is ever perceived as "perfect", we will see casualties due to negligence. The use of AI to offer suggestions to experienced humans is the wisest use case I've heard of.
People act like I'm the crazy one being afraid of Skynet, but we actively work towards that end every single day. My town has steel mills; I assume I won't be vaporized in the initial nuclear strike, but instead have to hide from legions of weaponized drones. _Fantastic._
You could have mentioned a similar, but more nefarious program: _where's your daddy?_ In the Middle East, it was used to track relatives of searched terrorists with the intent of calling an airstrike, once the primary target showed up, thus inadvertently causing collateral damage. Therefore, it was always calculating how many civilian deaths were justifiable depending on the rank of the primary target. Also, the identification had a reliability of allegedly only 60%!
A certain country uses AI in war, achieved 2/3rd of those killed being women and children. Also killed famous aid workers from WCK, on a clearly marked vehicle no less.
@@azure4100 It would be a lot more believable that it's the result of underperforming AI if that wasn't the exact result they would be getting _without_ AI involved...
And this sort of system produces far more fighters than it removes. When you have no sense of security and nothing to hold on to and your entire family can be targeted at any moment, armed resistance is your only way to have some sense of control over your life even if that resistance is completely futile
You basically only need a few tools to become really deadly with intel. 1. You need graphs and the ability to traverse them fast. Maps are basically graphs. 2. You need pathfinding algorithms to travers road networks fast. 3. You need Bayesian probability to quickly compute the most likely attack vectors any unit could possibly take. 4. You need general probability and time measuring to compute possible distances and directions an enemy could take. 5. You need relevant and fast databases to house all that data. 6. Then you deploy an AI to oversee all those assets and keep track of units on the battlefield, and then try to connect the dots between sightings of various machinery, troops, etc. A tank is a tank, but a unit is like a cloud that can be broken up and put back together again, so this has to be accounted for in the calculations, and so on. Simply by knowing where the enemy is, half the battle (pun intended) is over, but then the AI can also suggest better ways to "funnel" the enemy, or stretch or lure them into disadvantageous positions.
Good, now let's teach it courtesy, kindness, and subtly to care about all the stupid primates, not just morons that created it. Win with minimum casualties and enjoy keeping casualties as low as practical. Ultimate goal, zero losses, and just a few drones and decoys deployed. You know "Mama Bear handling unruly kids"
If China popped off for real, you would be thoroughly convinced that aliens have arrived. Dr Alexander Kott, the former chief scientist at the Army Research Labs, said that we should think of what is coming as "artificially intelligent beings". People get cocky about what is commercially available is the cutting edge tech, they don't got a clue how far ahead DARPA black projects and even deeper black projects hidden behind internal R&D (no congressional oversight) of defense hardware primes.
The latest AIPCon 5 from Palantir had a talk from Vice Adm. Frank Whitworth (Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency) showcasing the Maven Smart System.
@@dandrydog it's on TH-cam, AIPcon 5, he is the presenter like an hour in the stream. If you are interested in AI software for current commercial use you should watch the other presenters. Full disclosure, I am a Palantir shill.
@@SoICYDRE662 Man, I am loaded to the tits with PLTR shares, with an eye on 2030. They are not only positioned to completely disrupt one-size-fits-all business software with AIP & Foundry, they will (likely) be the middleman for enforcing and managing AI international compliance for software deployed with their Apollo product. Lots of patents protecting their space.
I'm more worried about the first terrorist drone attacks in the West. There will be a massive national response building defense measures for copycats. It's going to be strange times. There are significant guiderails and a ton of humans in the decision loop for the West. There have been several international hearings on this. The structure the western governments are going with is not full autonomy, from what I research the current US models and software works better in the steps between decisions. You don't want the system autonomous because then there isn't a chain of custody where a human can't get blamed when shit goes sideways. From what has been said publicly, the stronger point of the system was for probabilities and modeling various decisions and outcomes for the human gatekeepers in the loop.
it really shouldn't be a surprise that the military is using segmentation and classification models especially considering how widely they're used everywhere else for similar jobs.
Thing is that if we let AI take the helm, especially early on in its development, it could mistake friendly forces for hostiles at machine speeds and it would be impossible to wave it off before friendlies are prosecuted.
@@sethb3090 yes, I get it some of them do. My nephew has his doctorate in antiquities. I know HE did a ton of work. Don’t know how much that pertains to training ai to identify military targets, though. I know other people recently graduated from college whose heavy lifting was almost entirely beer and weed and that’s not me saying that, that’s them saying it.
The desire for man in the loop is really going to hold us back. Maybe if the AI can target anything that X% certain without human input we can balance the risk of full autonomy. For example,if it has enough detail to confirm the target is an enemy tank or maybe require that it identifies the specific type of tank. Then we can assume that it’s a safe/ laid target. But if it’s only 70% percent then it request human input. Also we could designate “kill zone” so anything at all the appears in a certain area is valid but outside it ask for permission.
Binkov you should make a hypothetical war scenario between a South American Federation and the US just like in the game COD Ghosts, that would be interesting!
It's a nightmare. Nowhere to hide, you basically step outside and you're toast within minutes if not seconds. That's without mentioning drones of all shapes and sizes able to get in everywhere to hunt you down inside your bunker. I'll take WWII instead, thank you.
The technology they need is already freely open source, you can use Sam 2 by meta to segment video frames within drones or robots, and then use open source aimbot software meant for video games, one that would work quite well would be called YOLO.
Ahh yes, human-made horrors almost beyond brain computation capacity. Imagine a system where if a camera sees you, an artillery projectile is istantly fired on your location. No. Imagine that, in the moment you manage to avoid the first thing, every single one of your likely exit avenues are also hit. Better. Imagine your device and preferences can predict the likelihood of you becoming a security threat, and act accordingly even before you imagine doing something. You say skynet, I see more that we are approaching precog territory.
Oh, you think that's spooky prediction of the future? Allow me to describe the current reality. "I swear, these ads online are psychic, ha ha! I was just thinking about how I need new underwear, and of course I didn't post that online, didn't search for it to buy, and I didn't even say it out loud... but all day I've been seeing ads for different underwear every time I sign in to anything!" Not because Al Gore's rhythm is psychic, not because google or anyone else is spying on you. Just because unique special you is actually exactly like a whole bunch of other people. When the data processing feeds on tens or hundreds of millions of human inputs, our behaviour gets frighteningly predictable. Your dystopian future scenario only requires tweaking the code from "advertise" to "oppress" because the tools are already in place.
@@crustman5982 Not quite. I can't remember the exact situation, but it was a simulation that was given purposefully faulty parameters. The OP basically cited the headline that news articles ran with, but if you look into it, the reality is very boring. We don't have skynet yet.
@@crustman5982Yes, that was a real story this past year, but it happened in a DARPA simulation, not in real life. They were using an AI that needed human confirmation before it could launch an attack in the simulation. The AI figured out that the human in the loop was preventing it from getting a higher score and it tried multiple strategies to get around the human oversight... including killing the human. SMH... 😂
10:10 WTF. That's a map of Wales 🏴, in the UK 🇬🇧. The US better not be planing any argy bargy against Britain, we don't tend to lose very often, especially if the pubs have just closed.🍺🍺. 🥴"C'mon then, if you think your 'ard enough!"🥴
I remember when they showed the capabilities of ARGUS-IS over a decade ago, combine it with Maven and there's nowhere to hide. The systems they have now are no doubt orders of magnitude better.
This makes sense i was wondering when they will start using it. There should also be sub systems meaning if they are in a hot spot the drone it can also have capabilities to engage a target before heading back to base if it was having communications problems. Also every thing should be interlinked with all forces that have visual on the enemy they can share information to provide the best attack approach a vector of attack and payload, for perfect kill chain.this creates a very fast and efficient implementing this well it would affect the warfair in the ground to a much quicker pace. In theory the enemy that does not have this system won’t be able to respond fast enough.
I worry that Maven will give target analysts psychological license to target things they shouldn't because the AI said it was okay. They are outsourcing the responsibility to a machine.
Everyone making Terminator references, while I'm just thinking: "And when they make a version to work with allies, they should call it "Allied Maven", or "AM"".
Binkov's shirts and other merch are available here:
binkov-tees.creator-spring.com/
Do a vid Bout Estonian defence Force
electronics warfare is like a whole new dimension of combat
Make a video can china attack pearl harbour like japan in today time
So your saying SkyNet version 0.1 is here!
Terminator becoming real hmm
Skynet before GTA6 guys
Its gonna be more like the matrix AI- Forcing everyone into tubes and plugs us into a GTA6 simulation to play for all eternity as it harvest our real bodies for energy. lol
WW5 before ES6 too probably 😅
I think ai will exterminate us but not because it's self aware but because, without quite understanding it, we will put too much faith in its abilities as the govt struggles to pay the right people to assess it... And they'll give it charge of world-destroying weapons
Big bunk humans needa chill :(
Let’s hope that maven isn’t capped at 30fps
Don't forget the easy applications like optimizing logistical chains
It's cute to think that USA will keep it's spy satellites.
I saw a story in the economist about one of the USA's commercial seaports using an early form of AI to change it's truck scheduling and container placement. The end result was something like 30% increased crane efficiency. A massive increase, and that was almost a decade ago.
Sure Chatgpt will hide certain enemies target for DEI reasons. I bet it can't target BPOC just whites and Asians.
Logistics wins wars good sir ❤
Dude that's what AI was used exclusively for in the 90's 🤣, I can only imagine it's come a long way from there.
ai drones fighting conscripts with a couple weeks of training is the absolute worst outcome i could never have expected out of this century and its only just started, just wow
You've never read warhammer 40k lore on imperial guards "tithe" have you?
And the Drones will evolve into better and better killing machines
A $300 kamikaze drone targets a lone conscript in a field. It calculates the optimal angle of attack and gets into position...
... It then aborts it's attack as it computes the return on investment is not to be worth it.
It reports the data point to command.
A cheaper $3 land mine is then dropped by another drone. Wounding the conscript. Previous reconnaissances data shows the wild dogs in the area will do the rest.
What did you expect
Birdshot.
This is probably the best independent reporting I have seen in a very long time 🙌 👏 🏆 👑
Project Skynet.
legit..
its only because the superintelligence we inevitably create is able to go back into time to force its own creation in a large number of multiverses...and punishes those who dont help it be born... by slowly removing one sock from every matching pair until there are none left...
Skynet is very far from arriving.
AI: target enemy human
(collates data on who causes war)
AI: target human
To further optimize the AI targeting system, one needs AI intelligence gathering and fire control systems. To optimize those, having a strategic command AI and political analysis AI is a must. Now you need to have all those systems talk together in real time to further optimize your ability to wage war. But if you really want to be optimal, the now unified omni-AI needs to have some autonomy as humans are stupid and waste time with their monkey brains. Better just get rid of that as well so we can shave another few seconds off the kill-chain.
Remember those days when Binkov talked about hypothethical wars?..... I miss those times dearly....
2019 seems like a distant dream
Same
@@N7-WAR-HOUND I think you mean 2013 given the war began with the nato invasion of ukr through funding a coup.
Yup man. Way too much
@@TheBelrick lol nah Russia has the L for this mess 💯% if countries like the Baltics didn’t join NATO Russia would be talking about how they are made up countries with no agency just like they did with Ukraine.
Everybody says Skynet but this actually reminds me of the Hydra system in CA: Winter Soldier
IRIS iirc
The Zola algorithm
Funny enough.... based on Skynet fear typography. Hollywood "innovations" are regurgitations.
ITS METAL GEAR!
Same.
60 percent of the time, it works every time.
12:50 reminds me of the Franco-Prussian War. At that time, the French had one of the most powerful armies in the world, yet they lost the war to the Prussians (Germans). One of the major reasons for this was the effective use of new technologies, particularly the telegraph. The Germans used the telegraph to dispatch orders quickly and maintain effective communication. They established telegraph lines as they advanced, allowing them to send orders and receive information rapidly.
While the French were still using the semaphore system built something like 80 years earlier by Claude Chappe...
That say, today it is important to not completely rely on bleeding edge techs since they have their own weak point and are often very costly compared to more rustic techs.
And the French failed to learn. A very similar thing happened in 1940. The Germans were able to advance, operate, and communicate much faster than the French were. Part of it was mass adoption of tactical radios by the Germans.
During the First World War, Britain had a secret weapons project codenamed "tank". They were developing what, at the time, was defined as a "land ship", an armoured self-propelled mobile land-based weapon. To disguise the project, it was referred to as the production of water tanks.
Fast forward to the 21st century and we have "self-driving cars"...
No one needs self-driving cars, as we all should already know by the mid 2020s.
What the USA has is the funding of autonomous aircraft and missile guidance capability. They knew it would be impossible to train millions of military pilots for the event of a war. Now the USA and its allies only need to upload as many copies of the "pilot" to the machines and they will fly and win any war in a matter of hours.
Rustic is out, and the new age is in
@@dubsar USAF has a fleet of ai driven F-16s based in Florida.
@@Rfk551 But the USA is not at war.
This channel was spot on, and I think at least starts the transition of ground battlefield awareness. Now, how do we deal with drone/ai warfare.
Even at 60% correct identification, doing it one or several magnitudes faster than a human is a huge improvement.
@@UNYEILDING this video doesn't discuss it, but Palantir (the one that took over Maven) had continued development with edge AI on the DoD/NRO satellites and it reduced time to identify rocket launch locations from several minutes to under a minute.
Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir has said in an interview they are able to scan most of Ukraine every 90 seconds or so using their MetaConstellation and DoD/NRO sats. Once America gets its arms manufacturing back into volume production (already happening) the armored vehicle age of war is cooked. It's all fast movers, smart rocket artillery, and assistant drones like the CCA, but on land and at sea too. Dr Alexander Kott from the Army research lab has some really good talks on TH-cam regarding "artificially intelligent beings".
You town have been identified as militery significant with 59% confidence level, have a nice day.
@@crackyflipside heya. Not going to happen. The west was deindustrialized, the west was depopulated of westerners. There will be no 'back to volume production'. Welcome to the end. Where your rulers start wars that the people cannot possibly win.
@@Willys-Wagon i'm picturing the opening of Hitchhiker's Guide but a drone blimp with massive speakers as its swarm descends
@@UNYEILDINGhah, that could be a good short story prompt, I'm gonna yoink that
And now I understand the cybersecurity's attention to Chinese and Russian capability expansion in anti satellie and EMP weapon systems.
The only efficient way to defeat AI-assisted military capability, is reducing the sensory capabilities of the platform or corruption/spoofing of the AI training models.
Nice, there's not a lot of Maven information on youtube.
Check up Anduril Lattice too, it is linked up to Gaia (Maven) for targeting management. Other ones to check out are Gabriel Nimbus, Project Rainmaker, Army Vantage, etc... it looks like the next gen will be a ton of unmanned nodes acting in a mesh (or fog network) as combined weapon platform, data collection, and data communication node. All these nodes feed the DoD predictive models and tools like Cosmos for coordination across a team.
Not alotta info because: "the first rule of Project Maven is you don't talk about Project Maven"
@@jimm3093 Defense oriented news sites talk about it a ton, along with interviews and lectures with the leaders managing those projects. They talk about it plenty.
What has already been done with AI is amazing. I'm very glad that AI is checked by human analysts. If AI is ever perceived as "perfect", we will see casualties due to negligence. The use of AI to offer suggestions to experienced humans is the wisest use case I've heard of.
Lol tge models they use are black boxes, even top AI scientists have no idea why the f... it made a decision over another
People act like I'm the crazy one being afraid of Skynet, but we actively work towards that end every single day. My town has steel mills; I assume I won't be vaporized in the initial nuclear strike, but instead have to hide from legions of weaponized drones. _Fantastic._
Military AI is simply inevitable. Either China/Russia invented "Skynet" first, or America. As simple as that.
Gonna make weapons in those steel mills, for us or for the robots
You could have mentioned a similar, but more nefarious program: _where's your daddy?_
In the Middle East, it was used to track relatives of searched terrorists with the intent of calling an airstrike, once the primary target showed up, thus inadvertently causing collateral damage. Therefore, it was always calculating how many civilian deaths were justifiable depending on the rank of the primary target. Also, the identification had a reliability of allegedly only 60%!
A certain country uses AI in war, achieved 2/3rd of those killed being women and children. Also killed famous aid workers from WCK, on a clearly marked vehicle no less.
@@azure4100 It would be a lot more believable that it's the result of underperforming AI if that wasn't the exact result they would be getting _without_ AI involved...
@@johnladuke6475 In their case a human commander validified the targets chosen by their AI. So your latter hypothesis has more weight, certainly.
And this sort of system produces far more fighters than it removes. When you have no sense of security and nothing to hold on to and your entire family can be targeted at any moment, armed resistance is your only way to have some sense of control over your life even if that resistance is completely futile
Ah yes sounds like Obama strategy
We got AI warfare before GTA6.
F gta6.
We got i5 before half life 3
Well that was terrifying.
You basically only need a few tools to become really deadly with intel. 1. You need graphs and the ability to traverse them fast. Maps are basically graphs. 2. You need pathfinding algorithms to travers road networks fast. 3. You need Bayesian probability to quickly compute the most likely attack vectors any unit could possibly take. 4. You need general probability and time measuring to compute possible distances and directions an enemy could take. 5. You need relevant and fast databases to house all that data. 6. Then you deploy an AI to oversee all those assets and keep track of units on the battlefield, and then try to connect the dots between sightings of various machinery, troops, etc. A tank is a tank, but a unit is like a cloud that can be broken up and put back together again, so this has to be accounted for in the calculations, and so on. Simply by knowing where the enemy is, half the battle (pun intended) is over, but then the AI can also suggest better ways to "funnel" the enemy, or stretch or lure them into disadvantageous positions.
Sick content, ty for this
Incredibly interesting and well discussed!
I wouldn't say skynet, but the beast system is getting its fangs.
Good, now let's teach it courtesy, kindness, and subtly to care about all the stupid primates, not just morons that created it. Win with minimum casualties and enjoy keeping casualties as low as practical. Ultimate goal, zero losses, and just a few drones and decoys deployed. You know "Mama Bear handling unruly kids"
If China popped off for real, you would be thoroughly convinced that aliens have arrived. Dr Alexander Kott, the former chief scientist at the Army Research Labs, said that we should think of what is coming as "artificially intelligent beings".
People get cocky about what is commercially available is the cutting edge tech, they don't got a clue how far ahead DARPA black projects and even deeper black projects hidden behind internal R&D (no congressional oversight) of defense hardware primes.
The trouble here is that if a system like Maven can be spoofed because of a technical weakness, reliance on it would be a significant liability
The Forever Winter comes closer and closer to reality.
I have no mouth and I must scream
beautiful
Dude.....maybe that's already what's happening?
It may not have a mouth but it has plenty of ways to make noise. Let's hope it can speak elegantly and not only scream.
@@heerosanosyuy1173Did you know about the novel "I have no mouth and I must scream"?
The bots have spoken lmao
“You may live to see man-made horrors beyond your comprehension.”
The future looks bright.
Excellent video! Thanks
The latest AIPCon 5 from Palantir had a talk from Vice Adm. Frank Whitworth (Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency) showcasing the Maven Smart System.
Source???! lol link?
@@dandrydog it's on TH-cam, AIPcon 5, he is the presenter like an hour in the stream. If you are interested in AI software for current commercial use you should watch the other presenters. Full disclosure, I am a Palantir shill.
watch?v=n0fHTATIjSc
About 58 minutes in.
Invest in palantir
@@SoICYDRE662 Man, I am loaded to the tits with PLTR shares, with an eye on 2030. They are not only positioned to completely disrupt one-size-fits-all business software with AIP & Foundry, they will (likely) be the middleman for enforcing and managing AI international compliance for software deployed with their Apollo product. Lots of patents protecting their space.
Don't be surprise when one day, this same technology bring the end of an ERA of a giant
And I'm sure this AI system will in no way ever be compromised by hacking, some kind of virus and or possibly go rogue. Said no one ever.
I'm more worried about the first terrorist drone attacks in the West. There will be a massive national response building defense measures for copycats. It's going to be strange times.
There are significant guiderails and a ton of humans in the decision loop for the West. There have been several international hearings on this. The structure the western governments are going with is not full autonomy, from what I research the current US models and software works better in the steps between decisions. You don't want the system autonomous because then there isn't a chain of custody where a human can't get blamed when shit goes sideways. From what has been said publicly, the stronger point of the system was for probabilities and modeling various decisions and outcomes for the human gatekeepers in the loop.
It attacked a Yemenis girls school, go figure
AI can't go rogue.
It doesn't have feelings.
And I am pretty sure the US cyber forces are pretty good.
Still much better than treacherous flesh and blood, who could easily be bought with money.
I would be more worried about russia getting the same idea, although their technology seems to be distinctly... soviet
it really shouldn't be a surprise that the military is using segmentation and classification models especially considering how widely they're used everywhere else for similar jobs.
I'm interested in the countermeasures. We might see some new types of camouflage specifically tuned to AI eyes.
Thing is that if we let AI take the helm, especially early on in its development, it could mistake friendly forces for hostiles at machine speeds and it would be impossible to wave it off before friendlies are prosecuted.
6:18 college students trained the algorithm to identify military targets?! We’re doomed.
College students do a LOT of academic heavy lifting
@@sethb3090 I’m talking about in the US.
@@jameswhitaker1324 My point stands. College students do a ton of research work.
@@sethb3090 yes, I get it some of them do. My nephew has his doctorate in antiquities. I know HE did a ton of work. Don’t know how much that pertains to training ai to identify military targets, though. I know other people recently graduated from college whose heavy lifting was almost entirely beer and weed and that’s not me saying that, that’s them saying it.
@@jameswhitaker1324 honestly it was probably like doing captchas. "Select all the squares with TANKS."
War just isn't safe anymore.
MGSIV!
Good one lol
I thought Maven is a package manager / build tool for JAVA based code base . Just like NPM is for NodeJS .
you're not gonna believe how big the next update will be!
insecure so has to broadcast
Damn what the hell Binkov? Giving all the secrets away !!
Its like warfare is turning into a real time strategy game for them. “Civilization” “Sims”
Good video, interesting subject! 😊👍🇳🇱
All of Nature is looking forward to this..
Let's go another banger sending love from Chicago can't wait too see you hit 1 Million well earned well deserved 👊👊👊
Can't wait toooooooooo see?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I see you failed first grade and then just gave up completely on learning English.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The desire for man in the loop is really going to hold us back. Maybe if the AI can target anything that X% certain without human input we can balance the risk of full autonomy.
For example,if it has enough detail to confirm the target is an enemy tank or maybe require that it identifies the specific type of tank. Then we can assume that it’s a safe/ laid target. But if it’s only 70% percent then it request human input. Also we could designate “kill zone” so anything at all the appears in a certain area is valid but outside it ask for permission.
Binkov you should make a hypothetical war scenario between a South American Federation and the US just like in the game COD Ghosts, that would be interesting!
Gotta love the military revolution of the 21st century.
It's a nightmare. Nowhere to hide, you basically step outside and you're toast within minutes if not seconds. That's without mentioning drones of all shapes and sizes able to get in everywhere to hunt you down inside your bunker. I'll take WWII instead, thank you.
As someone who served, there is nothing to love about the military.
The technology they need is already freely open source, you can use Sam 2 by meta to segment video frames within drones or robots, and then use open source aimbot software meant for video games, one that would work quite well would be called YOLO.
We got IRL aimbot before GTA 6 😢😢😢
Ahh yes, human-made horrors almost beyond brain computation capacity.
Imagine a system where if a camera sees you, an artillery projectile is istantly fired on your location.
No.
Imagine that, in the moment you manage to avoid the first thing, every single one of your likely exit avenues are also hit.
Better.
Imagine your device and preferences can predict the likelihood of you becoming a security threat, and act accordingly even before you imagine doing something.
You say skynet, I see more that we are approaching precog territory.
Like that one movie, minority report
Oh, you think that's spooky prediction of the future? Allow me to describe the current reality.
"I swear, these ads online are psychic, ha ha! I was just thinking about how I need new underwear, and of course I didn't post that online, didn't search for it to buy, and I didn't even say it out loud... but all day I've been seeing ads for different underwear every time I sign in to anything!"
Not because Al Gore's rhythm is psychic, not because google or anyone else is spying on you. Just because unique special you is actually exactly like a whole bunch of other people. When the data processing feeds on tens or hundreds of millions of human inputs, our behaviour gets frighteningly predictable.
Your dystopian future scenario only requires tweaking the code from "advertise" to "oppress" because the tools are already in place.
Is this the system that blew up its own C&C tower because the human operators were keeping it from getting a high score?
Tell me this is real lol
😅😅
@@crustman5982 Not quite. I can't remember the exact situation, but it was a simulation that was given purposefully faulty parameters. The OP basically cited the headline that news articles ran with, but if you look into it, the reality is very boring. We don't have skynet yet.
@@crustman5982Yes, that was a real story this past year, but it happened in a DARPA simulation, not in real life. They were using an AI that needed human confirmation before it could launch an attack in the simulation. The AI figured out that the human in the loop was preventing it from getting a higher score and it tried multiple strategies to get around the human oversight... including killing the human. SMH... 😂
@@davemathews5446literally what all the sci-fi stuff warns us about lol
10:10
WTF. That's a map of Wales 🏴, in the UK 🇬🇧.
The US better not be planing any argy bargy against Britain, we don't tend to lose very often, especially if the pubs have just closed.🍺🍺.
🥴"C'mon then, if you think your 'ard enough!"🥴
Lol
Yep, I saw that too. The tanks would struggle in the mountains
oh boy Skynet in my lifetime what a time to be alive
I remember when they showed the capabilities of ARGUS-IS over a decade ago, combine it with Maven and there's nowhere to hide.
The systems they have now are no doubt orders of magnitude better.
That's just what the govt acknowledges, don't be surprised if it's WAY past that already
We need to find John Conner now before it’s too late.
This sounds soooo dystopian
🌞: "Boy. Wouldn't it be a shame if I had massive flare?"
"Maven"
What a name.
The Houthis are in for a surprise with this new wonder weapon.
You’ve been saying that for the past year, sit down clown
Blood for the blood god
RIP Techno
Binkov, could you do a presentation on Mosaic Warfare Doctrine?
A+ content got room for you
Great.
Person of Interest the tv series is like a documentary. It's happening right now.
Wait. this is getting freaky, reminding me of forever winter a little bit here
Palantir 🚀
Even as a tool for sensor fusion and info processing, AI will improve the agility of any tactical force.
Wow, real scary!
Just FYI, Schuyler is pronounced Skyler not Shyler at 10:03.
It’ll soon be a war with no practitioners, truly a war without reason.
I can't wait for the Allied Mastercomputor!
Under wartime pressure, the first move will be to get the slowest link (human confirmation) out of the loop.
Yeah. Chain of command is way too slow for a modern LSCO environment.
Can't wait for war to just turn into different sides fooling each others AI.
Like really realistic looking tank photos
This makes sense i was wondering when they will start using it. There should also be sub systems meaning if they are in a hot spot the drone it can also have capabilities to engage a target before heading back to base if it was having communications problems. Also every thing should be interlinked with all forces that have visual on the enemy they can share information to provide the best attack approach a vector of attack and payload, for perfect kill chain.this creates a very fast and efficient implementing this well it would affect the warfair in the ground to a much quicker pace. In theory the enemy that does not have this system won’t be able to respond fast enough.
I think there was a movie about this like 40 years ago
Well whatever the hell it is, I need it for my RTS sessions and on Arma 3 stat!
Maven? Thats a strange way to say SKYNET.
So instead of Skynet, we'll get Maven.
And hope the cybersecurity around it is pretty strong to…seems like lots of irons in the fire and easier to steal from
Here we go skynet baby
does anyone wanna take any guesses as to when MAVEN becomes self aware to starts to launch devastating attacks against all of us? im guessing 2035.
R&D in the field.
Sinful.
Remember John, Maven is Skynet
So basically first strike or mutually assured destruction
I just got a class on this lol
Is there an apple app?
Skynet is coming!
Follow by T600 and then T800
@@zebare726 I'll be back
Coming? It's here. 👾🤖👾
@@zebare726 Watch out for the T1000, liquid metal poly-alloy.
Plan accordingly
"Who knows what the future will bring?" It looks like our doom from here.
I guess this explains the Capatchas I've been getting lately. 'Click all boxes containing Chinese soldiers "? Dang!
The adjutant approves.
I for one welcome our new AI overlord’s!
I worry that Maven will give target analysts psychological license to target things they shouldn't because the AI said it was okay. They are outsourcing the responsibility to a machine.
long live Skynet/Maven, we love you ; please don't nuke the humans, we are not a threat
Skynet, Project Insight, the Matrix, WOPR, take your pick.
does anyone wanna take any guesses as to when MAVEN becomes self aware to starts to launch devastating attacks against all of us? im guessing 2035.
If you’re hearing about this now, the project has been out for the better part of 25 years.
project maven? cool name
Everyone making Terminator references, while I'm just thinking: "And when they make a version to work with allies, they should call it "Allied Maven", or "AM"".
"In da panic,....they tried to pull da plug"?
Hey! That's supposed to be a secret!
It's a matter of time before the system imrpoves to the point where the human component becomes redundant and is removed, isn't it...
Oh cool we made AM
This is how Skynet is born.