Stay better informed ground.news/caspian and access world-wide perspectives on global developments. Subscribe for 40% off unlimited access through my link.
Why America and the west has the right to say what is order and what is not and any nation wants economical independence they invade it , sanction it or make a coup ? White people do you have a revelation from God that he told you what is good and bad? Say something 😊
Well it's time for the BRICS- New World Order to come up with a default reserve currency or simply go back to gold as the reserve. It will be too chaotic for each country to trade in their respective currencies with the daily change in exchange rates.
All big corps are just a cohort of centralised system working together, and any damage to one can have a dangerous ripple effect on every other one. I learned a long time ago to not trust corporations. Most of my money is in the stock market and my businesses. I keep only what I need to spend in my checking account.
Ironically, these are the conditions in which life-changing money is made by those who remain calm, patient, and take controlled risks. Volatility goes both ways. The banks are in a big crisis. The market looks very shaky. The bigger the red candles, the bigger the green ones. I have made over $280k in the last 14 months by investing through my FA.
I completely understand where you’re coming from. When I started collaborating with Annette Marie Holt, a fiduciary financial counselor, I really felt the advantages of having that expert guidance. It’s like navigating a boat through turbulent waters; having an experienced captain can make all the difference.
@@kamilhorvat8290 that's only correct asnwer, Russian oil is sold cheaply and we are buying refined from India, as sanctions intended (reduce profit without removing it from market)
Yeah, I dont think China needed to be included in this collusion. China isnt getting Russian military technology these days, they have better. China and India are Russias only export markets for quantities of oil.
Yeah but China buys like 70% of it. Don't confuse the BRICS with the CRINKs. Many of us in the BRICS dislike dictatorships as well. Russia and China only pretend to be part of the undeveloped world in order to gather sympathy. But India and Brazil, who actually represent the undeveloped world, are democracies.
@@ibk9987 China buys the vast majority of it. Don't confuse the BRICS with the CRINKs. Many of us in the BRICS dislike dictatorships as well. Russia and China only pretend to be part of the undeveloped world in order to gather sympathy. But India and Brazil, who actually represent the undeveloped world, are democracies, and we are neutral.
@@eliasloozen7948Mongolia is actually very much a friend of the West though, as well as to South Korea and Japan. They're also very much wary of China and want to keep their independence
Do you think Mongolia has the power to oppose China and Russia? Mongolia has a huge territory with only 3.5 million inhabitants and with $20.3 billion GDP. To put it in perspective in 2012 Russia alone was spending $48.2 billion on military only... not to mention Mongolia is landlocked by Russia and China. So I think Mongolia has no say if these Super powers decide to use it's land for transporting goods of any type.
Cold war was Capitalism vs Communism fighting for the 3rd world. This is the non democratic Neo-liberalist and newly emerged world powers vs the democratic Ultra-liberalist neo-colonial establishment. And this time the third world is being replaced by very vocal and more autonomous Global South emerging powers; and it has mostly already chosen a side.
@@noobymooby-ty8gh well, as they say, since the roman empire, "vis pacem, para bellum". Basically, peace is the time you use to prepare for the next war.
This video is wild. It paints these 4 as unique countries that are tired of US hegemony when it’s the majority of the world that thinks this way. When you bully and sanction more than 1/3 of the world, what do you expect?
True. Most of those countries still side with america because as of now it is still the egemon of the world. But rest assured that when the time is ripe they will take a slice out of the falling giant
The alignment of the Asian continent is the greatest American blunder of the century. They had so many chances to avoid this. Now a truly nightmare scenario is manifesting before our eyes. BRICs holds over 60% of the world’s population between them. The West is screwed
Mongul empire was the first empire in which women were largely participated in managing the territories. Even many of their council members were women. It was largely because men were always fighting. So inside the empire everything was ok and soft and in peace. But it was hell outside the main land. Does it remind you of a contemporary empire? Oh yeah, US!
We live in the 21th century version of the pre ww1 era. Multipolarism, multiple powers signing alliances and heading for a head first collision, the only ingredient missing in the powder keg is the match, a 21th century franz ferdinand. Hoping Im dead wrong.
You are not, i am guessing major war will start after 2035 to 2040 as that is the year most countries in the world will face demography collapse which in turn cause economy collapse. In this decade most countries are preparing for that war.
Multipolarism is a Russian fantasy. The don't have the economic strength to seriously challenge the American order, and the idea that they would be more than a junior partner to the Chinese is delusional. It's like the British thinking they would be a major player after WW2.
You mean "Powder Keg", not cake, which sounds delicious. The thing is, despite the internet all of human history/knowledge available instantly to everyone, humans are flawed and will still repeat history's greatest mistakes. And those of us who study history can do little about seeing it unfold again. Kinda like us american voters about to elect a Führer.
You're saying that those four nation historically hated and invaded each other, implying this as a weakness of their alliance, I can say the same about the West historically hated one an other and their wars talks louder than words.
Good point, the west has had a chance to reorganize their powers after multiple wars. They no longer divided about land, reparations and who has what. The east has never had this, petty land grab, after petty land grab with no real winner has left them all jaded and power is still divided.. They are in it for their own befits. Meanwhile, the west's allies are losing money helping each other... *Their actions speak louder than words, I agree!*
Two things. 1. Did not mention India's support to Russia. Mentioned Iran, China and North Korea only. I’m sure there are others, again, not mentioned. 2. Said, Iran, China and North Korea support, so many, is first in a long time. Not true. The U.S., the U.K., France, Et Al. routinely support Israel with weapons, intelligence, diplomatic cover and money.
India support what benefits them strategically and economically. They still has good relations with both the west and Russia. In short, India is neutral.
India doesn't support Russia's *special operation* and has multiple times said directly to stop w@r but it just buys cheap oil, since it has good relations with Russia and that same oil goes to Europe. Which basically helps to stabilize global oil prices, since Venezuela and Iran also has many sanctions, so you can't buy oil from them. Basically it's beneficial for both sides, this way, oil prices still remains manageable and Russia is only earning enough that it can continue it's oil extraction. If India were to support Russia openly and send weapons or military personnels, then you can say India is taking side but as of now, it's just balancing both according to its own benefits.
The U.S. stance with Israel doesn't help the U.S.' s position in the world. Add to that the U.S.'s own bad foreign policies and the outlook isn't good for U.S. hegemony.
That’s because both sides of the American political isle are funded by AIPAC. Zionists. They will support Israel till the end of time unless this is dealt with.
America has invented the technologies you are using right now. American has created the world order that has led to the most peaceful and prosperous era in the history.
Idk what's the point of droning of historical conflicts in these kind of videos. Those "conflicts" in the past means nothing, US and Britain warred before, France and Britain warred before, and let's not even talk about Germany and Japan not too long ago. It's irrelevant.
@@Rubber10lol. So when we say that Apple is a business empire, we don't necessarily mean that they have physically conquered territories. You know that...right?
People who think imperialists like Russia and China are part of the developing world, and that aggressively expansionist autocracies have any true interest in the equality of nations besides getting more power for themselves, are either bad faith autocrat enablers or straight up stupid. Autocrats only cry for a "multipolar world" because the free world rules and they wish they weren't prevented from oppressing others. Russia and China just play nice with you now because they have no choice and need allies. If China and Russia ruled the world you'd see what true unipolarity looks like, because they control everyone they can. The USA and the EU rule the world but they let everyone they can be free, that's not unipolarity at all.
I heard professor Marandi take on why russia and iran didn't sign the defense treaty thing yet and he said, they were not even close allies till the Ukraine war that we pushed them together just like we did china and russia...
Persia has a long history of wanting to stand alone. They are, after all an ancient civilization with a fairly unique identity. That had always meant quite a bit of friction with the Russian Empire and the Soviets. I honestly don't think the Kremlin is in the habit of wanting to rely on Tehran for ANYTHING. Doing so is probably a sign of weakness in Moscow. That said, it certainly has emboldened Tehran - which is not good for anyone. HIstory shows that when Persia gets greedy, the entire region usually ends up going up in flames. Ironically, the one thing Persia could do that would be partially welcomed by all sides, would be to handle the situation in Afghanistan. Would it make the West nervous? Sure. But, no one likes the Taliban.
@@Robespierre-lIwhen it's russia and it's friends helping each other I notice you people love saying "it's weak for Moscow to "rely" on Tehran or Beijing, but when it's America and its friends or allies it's called "strategic cooperation" what a biased joke
8:46 this is propaganda. Spheres of influence mean completely different things to these countries. What do you mean by "China casting a net over Taiwan" because it means something completely different from the relationship between Russia and the Post Soviet states. Under the One China policy that the US adopted,the question of China reunifying with Taiwan by force wasn't even in the discussion. Its so convenient for these western "analysts" to omit decades and decades of continuous provocation and disrespect for already established treaties designed to make everyone live together in peace, and make blanket statements twisting the intentions of their rivals turning them to foes.
I know right. I hate how much empty rhetoric there is in these videos contain. "they possess the power to tip the world off its axis", what does that mean? It's like me saying that I have the power do send ripples down the fabric of the universe. In concrete terms what exactly do you think these four dictators have the power to do?
What makes all of us, here in the West laugh is that we live, rent free in the heads of these despot lunatic leaders........24/7..... 365 days a year!!😂😅
@@user-jt3dw6vv4x then the US will switch support to Pakistan in that case, i find it hard to believe that India and Pakistan would be allies in such a global conflict. Logic dictates that NATO would pressure one of the sides to join them. In any case they would exploit this weakness in relations.
@@gabor-zsoltbenedek9420they are welcome to but pakistan is a dumpster fire , US would do itself no favors and technically they do sent military aid to Pakistan to.this day for " counter terrorism " , isn't that ironic ?
At 4:09 this video shows a complete distortion of reality. The post World War II order did not mean that Russia had to become subservient or obedient United States unilaterally. Instead, the United States claimed that there would be United Nations and that China and Russia would have veto any actions by the west that would be adverse to those two powers. That was in recognition that they were equally important partners in the world and their sovereignty could be protected by votes at United Nations the US has actually circumvented the postwar world order, which is to go only through the United Nations for all the kind of activity that are going on. At the time of the gulf wars, we still believed that we needed you and authorization to militarily go in to Iraq. US officials won that approval from the United Nations, including nations like Russia and China, but since then United States unilaterally broke the world order when it bombed unilaterally Serbia against the objections of China and Russia. During that Serbian conflict, a Chinese embassy was destroyed in Serbia killing approximately as I recollect 12 Chinese nationals, so the criminal against the world order wasn’t Russia or China. The crime again with that attack on Serbia by President Clinton without you and approval or authorization. Also was an attack that made no sense. It was an attack on a civilian society, destroying all of its electrical power, grids, and civilian infrastructure, and you knew the actual time was a Islamic terrorist organization that the Serbian people were fighting. And the effect of what we did LA gain foothold inside the country. And the solution we had was that we then invited the UN to come in and police the country. So this narrator has a narrow focus that ignores the responsibility of the United States for destroying the post World War II world order, which gave no hegemony to the United States. And now the nations like Russia and China will act in their own unilateral interest just like the United States did when it broke the world war post World War III in the actions against Serbia.
Thats horrific but I'd like to remind you before that conflict, Russia interjected itself militarily after Afghanistan refused to become a Communist vassal for the USSR in 1979... West is still innocent for we did not set the precedent, good luck though, we aren't afraid to become the savages you claim us to be.
@ It’s not an argument. It’s simply the facts. The United States has itself unilaterally withdrawn from any necessity to get permission from the United Nations to go to war. This is not a small issue is we asked the whole world to come to this organization with the premise that would bring world peace and the subs in that we would all be that principle. But how many boys are we engaged in since then without any success I might add. in Iraq we killed 1.5 million people come including 500,000 children in the vein and hopeless effort to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. We needed the feeding ground for Isis in the whole world was a threat of that organization. Colin Powell‘s famous speech very held at the vile of anthrax at the United Nations should be a constant reminder that in that era was the last time we ever thought we needed to consult with the world and get a joint agreement that this is a worthy cause. Since then we’re back to completely unilaterally almost every war without you and approval. We seek selective approval from smaller organizations likeNATO. So we created the New World order and then we abandoned it ourselves. What does that tell you?
I plan to retire at 62 in another country outside the US that is free, safe and very cheap with a high quality of life. I could fully just rely on only my SS if I wanted to when that times arrives but I'll also have at least one pension, a 403 (b) and a very prolific lnvestment account with my Abby Joseph Cohen my FA. Retiring comfortably in the US these days is almost impossible.
I went from no money to lnvest with to busting my A** off on Uber eats for four months to raise about $20k to start trading with Abby Joseph Cohen. I am at $128k right now and LOVING that you have to bring this up here
Abby Joseph Cohen Services has really set the standard for others to follow, we love her here in Canada 🇨🇦 as she has been really helpful and changed lots of life's
At a global scale, an order where similarly powerful countries with differences can come together is preferrable to a centralized order where one power obviously dictates what their other "allies" "should" do.
Sure, because when there was parity between England and France and Spain and Portugal and the Netherlands, that had a great outcome for every other country in the world.
The alignment of the Asian continent is the greatest American blunder of the century. They had so many chances to avoid this. Now a truly nightmare scenario is manifesting before our eyes. BRICs holds over 60% of the world’s population between them. The West is screwed
@@TheRebelAllianceAreTerrorists I never said that "95% of the world's population is in the US", don't twist my words. I said that Putin's regime doesn't represent the entire world.
@@TheRebelAllianceAreTerrorists TH-cam deleted my comment, but what I meant to say is that you're twisting my words. I NEVER said that most of the world population is in the US. I just said that Putin doesn't speak for the entire world, and that the world does not revolve around him.
Definitely not. China is the leading competitive economic power and they are ALL about globalism. Have you not noticed what they have done since they turned their back on communist economic policies in their 1993 economic reform? They have become wealthy again BECAUSE of how they fully embraced global capitalism and exploited every opportunity it gave them. There is no major power in the world that does not engage with the reality of global capitalism. There's no alternate economic system being proposed. There are only a handful of reactionary political movements that are pushing protectionism again. BUt these are populist movements and they are ALL in the West Think again. It's not an easy subject to wrap your head around, but you'll get there.
Except Russia wants to expand to their former soviet glory which can only happen through military imperial expansion. Same with china with taiwan and other regions. They are not anti globalist, they just want to be in charge themselves
Ah, nothing like a bit of cross-continental teamwork to prep us for World War 3: The Sequel Nobody Asked For. With all these alliances, it feels less like geopolitics and more like a dystopian Avengers crossover. Guess we’re all just extras in this new blockbuster…
It really does, doesnt it? Plus the possible a.i. Takeover in 20-30 years from now, doesnt paints a nice picture for the future. Atleast weed is now legal in germany. High into the end. Have fun brothers and sisters evrywhere. Maybe peace and love in a second hippy era will save us🤗.
Honestly, the only country that could benefit from ww3 is the US. From their perspective they can see it as the only way out of its own decadent decent into global irrelevance. But I think they'll lose. They can go out with a bang or a whimper. Time will tell. I hope it's a whimper.
Indian oil imports from Russia have been dropping fast in the last 3 months. The new sections seem to be taking effect. Russian exports have dropped 30% from 12 months ago
Dude China's economy is 5 times India's economy....China literally shares physical land borders with Russia...India doesn't....China-Russia have energy pipelines....India-Russia have no connecting energy pipelines and all their trade largely go through the old Suez Canal route..
Quote: America IS a bully. They can invade Iraq and no consequences. Russia invades Ukraine (with far better reasoning) and the west tries to destroy them. This suits America, and Britain, Europe as to strengthens their weapons industry. As they say "war is good for business"
Ukraine gave up nuclear arms to guarantee it would not be invaded by russia, there was no such thing in Iraq. Russia plans to annex and incorporate the country into its federal apparatus, this was not the case in iraq The United states was retentively successful in conquering the land, quickly. this was not the case in Ukraine. Quote: *No one has ever forced a country to join NATO. Russia handles all of that for them.*
@lubu4u312 really. You obviously haven't read enough of Nulands engagement into Ukraine for the US state department. Thank goodness she's now gone. Bit Nato have meddled all through the far eastern Europe and beyond looking for an enemy and total hegemony. I'm fact I would reckon IF Russia did absorb Ukraine, and i don't think that's the intent, then it would be in a far better condition and state than Iraq and UK left Iraq. Yes Saddam ruled with an iron first, but Iraq is now but a mess of conflicting militia with Iran the largest supporter. You see Nato never wanted peace, and that's proven, as now they get their population to ensure mass military spend ups to fight a new bogey man. Why would anyone want to join Nato...... perhaps they have that right, but history does mean something and it's nieve to ignore it.
@@lubu4u312 Russia never planned to take any territory from Ukraine. Even Crimea would've stayed with them, had they not tried to take over Russian naval base, stationed there. Russia just has no other choice now. Since Ukraine refuses to peace talk, the only choice is to advance until they surrender. They love to claim how they got attacked "unprovoked", but at the same time, in the countless interviews they gave, they admit that they DID provoke Russia. I can explain what they tried to achieve and how. It's not a short story, but if you realy care, stay with me. Ukraine was always split to WEST and EAST, each with polar opposite political views and cultures. Even the language was different. A lot of westerners couldn't speak Russian and their Ukrainian sounded more like Polish, while easterners spoke "surzhik" (a mix of Russian and Ukrainian, but neither). Westerners were pro EU, while easterners pro Russian. They could barely understand each other, despite living in the same country. Some Ukrainian oligarchs decided to take it upon themselves to UNITE the country, so through a collaboration with foreign agents they caused a coup. Then they started to FORCE a new ideology on everyone. Since the new ideology was 99% pro West, easterners rebeled. It turned into a civil war. Since the now so-called "separatists" were pro Russian and had roots in Russia, there's no way Russia wouldn't say something about it. Russia spent years trying to convince Ukraine to do things differently, through diplomacy, but Ukraine had none of that. They wanted to unite the country, and they wanted it NOW. Even if this meant that half the country needs to be forced to accept the new ways and be prosecuted or k*lled if they disagree. Since Ukraine had an overwhelming support of the global West, they even thought that they can take over the Russian naval base in Crimea. Crimea was always a shared territory. It wasn't just Ukrainian. Maybe Ukraine did that to bootlick NATO, maybe it was a dirrect request/order from the US, or they were just fools, who knows? The fact is that they gave up on being NEUTRAL. When you say that Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons to preserve peace, that was only a part of that agreement. Ukraine had to stay neutral, but it sided with NATO. It doesn't matter that much if some other EU coutnry joins NATO, but Ukraine, Kazahstan or Belarus absolutely can not do that. It will shift the weight on the global power scales, endangering the peace and stability. It's dangerous to Russia. It's not Russia's whim, despite what your propaganda says. Despite what this channel says. Russia operates with surgical percision, trying not to harm civilians as much as possible. Ukrainians are allowed to visit their beloved, if they end up as prisoners of war. In the areas that Russia protected, new schools are being built, new roads, infrastructure. Things that Ukraine never did properly for its eastern part. Yet Ukraine drops shells on parks and beaches and generaly acts like a terrorist group. At the very start of the civilian war, back when Russia was even GIVING MONEY to Ukraine to help rebuild after the revolution, Kiev decided to launch missiles from the plane, targeting civilians in the east of Ukraine. There was another instance, where they m*ssacared unarrmed easter Ukrainian people in Odessa's trade union house. There are videos of it, look it up. It's just nuts. Your media won't show you theese thigns. They want you to hate Russia. I hope this reaches you and doesn't get blocked -_-
@@lubu4u312 How about now? Ukraine is threatening russia with nuclear usage? Russia plans to annex ukraine? Stop reading so much buzzfeed. USA was relatively quick to defeat Iraq because Iraq was severely weakened by the gulf war. Moreover ukraine has massive fundings as well as arms given to them by USA and EU. You saw what happened in Vietnam with you guys right? That was literally just 3 countries against you but you guys still lost. Russia has been dealing with the problem of being surrounded by nato allies. That's why they took such step
You can't compare Iraq to Ukraine. Iraq was a genocidal and totalitarian dictatorship under Saddam Hussein who launched "speshul milituhree operashuns" against Kuwait and Iran. "Iraq under the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party saw severe violations of human rights. Secret police, state terrorism, torture, mass murder, genocide, ethnic cleansing, rape, deportations, extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, assassinations, chemical warfare, and the destruction of the Mesopotamian marshes were some of the methods Saddam Hussein and the country's Ba'athist government used to maintain control. Saddam committed crimes of aggression during the Iran-Iraq War and the Gulf War, which violated the Charter of the United Nations. " (From Wikipedia) You CANNOT call America a "bully" when you're fanboying over dictatorships such as Putin's Russia and Saddam's Iraq and try to make them look like the good guys
I know that woman (Maria Angelina Alexander) If you were born and raised in new York you'd know too, she's my family's Broker for 3yrs till now and a very good one if you asked me. No doubt she is the one that helped you get where you are!!!!
“ to portray USA as a bully” Meanwhile trying to portray China as a bull. How many wars china started in the past 40 years? How many wars USA started in the past 40 years?
Maybe pro west is the right way objectively. When you have an imperialist war monger in Russia and China bullying its neighbors too. Like you can’t honestly think Russia and China are the good guys in any sense comparatively. The west is messed up and needs to improve but at least we aren’t as bad as these guys
its part of the western propaganda and marketing. they hide their identity, they dont clearly pick a side and they pretend to be objective. yt is full of channels like this.
western prosperity and comfort has made many of its citizens into idiotic zombies who know nothing about the world and are susceptible to propaganda from dictatorships.
It's not a coincidence. These people are bombarded with kremlin backed propaganda. All American right wing media is peddling pro kremlin and anti NATO bs and just last month it turned they were paid like 100k per episode or something ridiculous, by russian shell companies. Same with far left/tankie accounts, that also do a fair share of soviet revisionism. And yeah, when I was 20 I believed in even dumber stuff, zo I can't blame youngsters and boomers for falling for it. Alongside with uneducated right wingers trashy people who probably didn't finish highschool. This is the demographics. Oh and Musk supporters, not sure what kind of demographics that is.
Yes. If they trash talked any of those governments the way they do their own here, their life would take a painful turn real fast. People take democracy for granted, they won't know what they have until they have lost it, then the lamenting will come.
The alignment of the Asian continent is the greatest American blunder of the century. They had so many chances to avoid this. Now a truly nightmare scenario is manifesting before our eyes. BRICs holds over 60% of the world’s population between them. The West is screwed
Why? I'm glad our global nonsense is ending. You think we all like forever wars and watching trash be handed our wealth? America turning isolationist is the best thing for everyone, no more global police bs.
Well, they'll *tell* him he can join and then they'll take major advantage of him because he's an idiot. Their main goal is less American influence. If Trump becomes president then they basically have a dumbass whose policies amount to "I want America to have less influence too!"
@@Popovich16 if they win geo politics they wont stay allies because they dont realy like each other it just usa and west has been a vermene in this world who tried to shape world into globalism all other nations sence it unless there polticians have been filled with puppets they want mutlipolar world which is safer for small nation in africa and south america who doesnt like west culture world is just realy weird iran or china winning is bad i dont about china poltics they dont seem to have intrest inshaping other internal affairs but who knows but still i fills bit wired they are more business dealrs of infulence for now but best thing would usa gets strong west changes east get stronger no world war happens cause of taiwane and multipolar world happens and stays in stalemate
You mean other that that they are all oppressive authoritarian dictatorships with territorial expansion planned for the future? I dunno, that seems like a non-insignificant thing to have in common.
It`s the "Revolutiopn problem" isn`t it? It`s very easy with an oppressive force giving you no room looming above you to say "screw that guy we`re teaming up!" but as soon as you get a little bit of power you now suddenly have to deal with the fact that aside from hating the big guy on top, you don`t have that much in common...
well in ww2 big guy was hitler, russia and uk who are eternal rivals united about hatred of that guy despite having nothing in common and esablished current world order.
If you think about it, all of the pastic crap we buy originally comes from Russia. The Chinese plastic is made from Russian oil, possibly assembled in North Korea, then shipped on Norwegian freighters, which are registered in the Marshall Islands. What a wonderful world this could have been...
@@atillahanartagan2248 Persians, Azeri, Kurds, Baloch, Lur, Laks, Bakhtiari, Tadjiks, Afghans and many many more. The Iranian civilization is much more than just Persian. Cheers! You two my friend!
You are mistaken. Many do not dislike the West. Instead, they love the West, especially what it once stood for. What they actually dislike are dysfunctional and destructive Western governments.
the people that live in the west and realize and admit that the west is the cancer of the world are the only ones that have dignity in the west. the rest are trash that enjoy the loot.
It's not about creating an anti-American world order. It's about creating a world order of development and cooperation. Of course it can be anti-American but only if the USA will continue fighting against cooperation and dialogue
"world order of dEvELoPmEnT aNd cOoPeRatIoN" >North Korea >Russia >China >Iran I don't know about you but these 4 are all dictatorships, and the only one that even slightly appears to not want to violently conquer it's neighbors via military means s is China. And they (specifically referring to Russia, North Korea and Iran) represent anything but development and cooperation bro...
Like how russia is developing and cooperating in ukraine? Or how they did i chechnya. Maybe its closer to how china is developing and cooperating minority populations. And north korea... you get the point
@@nuhardusnytitdigivafflan8511 fr troub thinks a world order of authoritarian and totalitarian dictatorships is a world order of "dEvElOpMeNT aND cOoPErAtiOn" when those nations represent the total opposites of that
"development and cooperation" So called "wOrLd OrDer Of dEvEloPmEnT aNd cOoPerAtIoN" being only made out of authoritarian/totalitarian dictatorships that only pursue their own agendas, which represent the total opposite of those ideals. Get outta here, I highly doubt you would want to live under Putin's jackboot, let alone Kim Jong Un's.
None of them would try to develop others. In my ignorant idea, there would be the day, with technology high enough in 5 or next decade, people around the world would shift into fewer locations and forming large communities. Not just because of war, economic, demography, but also because of the climate change also shift into another new pacing period. There might be no country like this world map any more. So, in my opinion, NATO, or BRICS are the solutions.
Those old enough remember the Soviet Bloc, which was impressive in scale, involving not only present-day Russia but also many other countries that are now independent and pursuing their own interests. Yet, it ultimately failed. The union of states with structural issues is merely the combination of corruption and ineptitude; if you tie together 10 sinking boats they will all sink, they won't float. Russia and China are both on paths of decline-not only due to internal decay but also because of failing policies and even demographic crises. While obstacles to American power exist, it’s unlikely that mere hatred or anti-Americanism would significantly impede the U.S. when pressured. America is uniquely positioned as a unified federation with the rare ability to feed its population, sustain energy needs, produce fertilizers, and more. America can survive independently, while China cannot even meet its own food needs.
half of the americans are junkies, usa sells weapons to other countries while china sells infrastructure and goods, usa economy is based on corruption, debt and infinite money printing while china's economy is based on production, usa has the highest debt without any intention to pay it of. historically and purely number wise usa is in decline. propaganda cannot beat the numbers.
The problem with "enemy of my enemy" logic is that it's often the only thing uniting certain groups and thus tends to fall apart at the first speed bump. Ideologically, they have nothing in common other than "the USA is on top and I want to be on top instead". An alliance where all members want to be the top dog will constantly work against itself
The alignment of the Asian continent is the greatest American blunder of the century. They had so chances to avoid this. Now a truly nightmare scenario is manifesting before our eyes. BRICs holds over 60% of the world’s population between them. The West is screwed
Bingo.....the Multipolar angle that China is pushing for is only to gain allies against the West......China still has ambition of claiming Russian territory long term......but first they want to cooperate with Russia to get the bigger problem out the way which is the US.......
@ameyas7726 I don't think anyone in the western world is really arguing over who the global power is. If you're referring to France retaining direct control over the NATO forces it contributes, which is the only thing I can think of that you might be referring to, that hardly makes a difference as they are still part of NATO and regularly participate in joint military exercises with other NATO Nations. Naturally, sovereign Nations will pursue policies that will most benefit its own constituents but being that the Western world is fairly united in terms of morals, principles, and goals, the competition for "top dog" is barely relevant and if anything makes the alliance stronger. Meanwhile, with this anti-American alliance, sure there's cooperation for a temporary common goal but there's a good argument to be made that ultimately the support really only benefits the selfish goals of individual Nations. Think about it, if Russia wins in Ukraine, then China and Russia gain power in that NATO's credibility is reduced and it's a win-win for them both. If Russia loses in Ukraine, then China still wins because a (theoretically) powerful and bellicose Nation on their border takes a MASSIVE hit to their power and credibility and loses sway over many, if not all, of the Central Asian nations they've historically held sway over, leaving a China that hasn't been weakened by war and sanctions to step into the power vacuum and take Russia's place as the hegemon, growing their sphere of influence. Which as anyone knows, has been China's main goal for at least the last 20 years
USA has left reasons to hate her, but if the alternative is a world ruled by China and Russia... With this geopolitical situation plus climate change this century looks very bad...
@@daksans6764 Yeah bro being ruled by Russia where you get arrested for holding blank signs, having an entire cult of personality around Putin, where freedom of speech is non-existent and no social media platforms are allowed because "muh foreign terrorist agents" is TOTALLY better than living in the flawed democracy of America where you can vote, you can say whatever you want and there aren't personality cults around the "glorious leader". Great logic, buddy.
If China and Russia do get this powerful one day, do you think there won't be an equivalent of a "civil rights movement" in these countries? When people get rich they would demand more freedom.
I'm skeptical about the cohesiveness of NATO. European interests are increasingly divergent from US foreign policy. US-led sanctions against Russia and China harms European countries while it benefits the US. A direct NATO-Russia war brings destruction and catastrophe to Europe and Asia, while the US survives unscathed because these wars are waged on European soil and not on the US mainland. This must be an acute realization in Europe. If not yet, then I hope it they start to think about whether NATO is a force for peace or war, and whether they really want to be caught up in this type of dangerous alliance complexes that is reminiscent of 20th century militaristic "diplomacy".
extra note: All four of these countries are dictatorships that have no regard for the well-being of their own people And sadly, the comment section of this video is flooded by their keyboard warrior/bot divisions.
All countries know that difference. Just leftwing radicals screaming bullocks. But those 4 countries seem to have a hard time with free speech and wellbeing of their populations
Unlike the others, China has a large population of rich people. I don’t think they want to risk losing this by becoming a pariah state. Who will buy their stuff at high prices?
@karolisbareika8306 That argument isn't really relevant. Especially considering the OECD includes those G7 nations and it dwarfs BRICS. To only focus on the G7, is to only focus on the top 7 of a 38 nation economic alliance.
@daksans6764 Funny, that's your retort. After I pointed out, G7 is just the top 7 of the OECD. There is no dispute. BRICS is not even comparable to the OECD economic block.
I googled PAX and it means PEACE, so I'm confused by the term PAX AMERICANA. Let's see--Vietnam, Yugoslavia / Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, South America (just too many to list individually) and now Israel-Hamas-Lebanon, and of course, Ukraine. You understand my confusion?
vietnam-> chinese and communist were massacaring people there afganistan-> taliban gave shelter to bin laden after 9/11 iraq-> saddam did try to make nukes once and israel f$ucked his plan but bush is son of a wh0re for lying about WMD Syria-> US entered syria after 2014 sept, after !S!S became threat, before that it was weapon business South America-> I dont know much about it Israel-> you must support right side, besides hezbulla and hamas are not government they are terr0rist organization or military wing Russia-> well it was russia who attacked first and US is selling weapons not actively on war with Russia
As an Indian, I think I prefer that. We should and need to focus on ourselves and our interests. It is not in our interest to fall into Russian or American or Chinese wars.
The aim is multipolarity not an "anti-American word order". A number of major and regional powers that have had their interests under attack by the west under US leadership for some time, have a common interest in opposing the US obsession with global domination. These countries also have conflicting and divergent interests too. These powers respect the differences in each other's interests and avoid the use of war or force in dealing with these conflicts. For example Iran and Russia have common interests in Syria but conflicting interests over Israel or Islam within Russia, but they do business and avoid conflict. China and India have tensions over border disputes, but work together over BRICS issues. Conflict is contained to a minimal level by various devices such as not using fire arms in border skirmishes. The ultimate aim is the restoration of some global BALANCE OF POWER such as existed in the Cold War, so that one power, The USA does not go mad with the power imbalance and start attacking with military force any state that opposes its local domination over their region. It is to restore peace to the world by ending the "Monopolar" period during which the US and its allies resorted eagerly to military force in pursuit of their self-interests and were systematically destabilising and destroying the world bit by bit.
China doesn't like or want multipolarity, China would prefer to be the only dominant superpower alongside USA for the long run untill eventually it becomes the number dominant superpower in the world. This "multipolarity" bullshit only comes from Putin's Russia wich China is considering a junior partner.
@@nocrtname inequality is the greatest it’s ever been in human history. There are more poor people compared to the elites than there’s ever been. Just because people are getting buy & have smart phones doesn’t mean the world is thriving.
@@catadoxas The global reduction in military spending due to the US' role in preventing annexation by foreign military conquest (none in the past 80 years, globally) has allowed additional funding into R&D, as well as healthcare, infrastructure, and education. This funding, historically, would have gone into defense spending.
To be an order, it would imply having the power to tell those who don't want to be in that order to do what they want. That order might never come to be. What you were looking for is the word anti-American alliance or anti-western alliance. Aslong it would be just Iran, China, Russia and North Korea i would not be too concerned. More important might be the BRICS economic treaties, if they would change in ways that would allow Russia to avoid sanctions and also keep trade and ressources from western nations. Russia is already trying to influence BRICs memebers to challange the petro dollar, but sofar i don't see anything happening besides the wishes from Russia.
The alignment of the Asian continent is the greatest American blunder of the century. They had so chances to avoid this. Now a truly nightmare scenario is manifesting before our eyes. BRICs holds over 60% of the world’s population between them. The West is screwed
the greek ships transport the russian oil and gas under usa sanctions and europe is still buying. according to western media propaganda yes russia has the biggest problem of the world, but according to numbers its business as usual.
im proud i was born in the west. i also had a friend here in the west and one night he took his dog out for a walk and he never came back, he was shot in the head from behind by a cop because he was just running next to the dog. after that the cop got a promotion and obviously no court about the murder. living in the west is amazing.
any REPORTER should UNDERSTAND and fully describe TERM - BEING IMPARTIAL ... Something that this reporter is MISSING, look at US/UK actions around the World
"Side eye" is a good description. Reading through some of the comments, people seem to think that living in a dictatorship or theocracy is better than living in a democratic nation.
You really gonna pretend the facade of "democracy" didn't fall of in the last year? People have been beaten, imprisoned, censored, lost their jobs. For the grand crime of calling out that one criminal state for what they are doing. I can't even name the state or the crime here because my comment will be hidden.
Russia had pro-Western rhetoric until 2007, at which time NATO began to expand at least twice. why? Russia did not threaten anyone then and was friendly with the entire West. The West ignored all of Putin’s warnings and here we are. the whole reason is the West’s disrespect for Russian interests, and their interests contradict Western interests, but either you respect this or you are at enmity.
@@GokhanYlmaz-eg7jf You're saying "expand", implying that NATO was militarily invading other nations. *cough cough* No, that was not the case. As about the "Russia did not threaten anyone" part, that's also not true since Russia invaded some of it's neighbors before that (specifically Chechnya and Georgia) Plus when you join NATO, you don't get foreign tanks in your streets, you join voluntarily, signing paperwork and what not. While in order to join the likes of Russia, you get foreign tanks in your streets. Do with that information as you will.
the funniest of all is finland for example that believes that russia who is neighbor is more likely to throw nuclear bombs to them rather than usa. yes im so stupid as an american to fill my borders and my air with radioactivity... the lack of common sense in the west is amazing.
As an Indian don't count India in quad for god's sake. Most Indians hate the west and its imperialistic policies. Indians love Russia and the border conflict with china was resolved a few days ago around the time of Brics Sumit in Kazan. India will never ever ally with the west
I'm Indian and all I can say is that QUAD or not we're never going to go against Russia lol. The best possible case for the West would be Indian staying slightly pro-Western but still neutral nonetheless. But this is the best case for the West. We on the other hand would choose whatever is the best case for us.
You don't know what you are talking about Australia is under the queen of UK and India is not a partner of USA at the level of UK or even Brazil or Germany
Meanwhile list of countries in NATO - Albania, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States
if you compare the populations and the economies you will be disappointed. nato is consumer economies full on debt that will collapse if the producer stops the trade. 8 billion total population and nato may be max 600-700m.
An important missing point here is that people, either in the West or outside of it, don't need to support one side, don't have to decide between West and the "alternative coalition". While the non-Western emerging powers violate the human rights of their own citizens much more than the West, the Western democracies turned remarkably authoritarian in the past decades, and the situation has never been as nice as it's pictured in the propaganda. Most Western states are racist and hate the poor. And especially today, Western governments crack down on free speech and political rights of citizens shamelessly, and they use totalitarian surveillance towards these aims. Regarding the international affairs, the West does violent crimes, mass murders all the time, out of greediness, with the aim of subjugating and exploiting people. Outside of the West, only Russia does the same, only Russia started an imperialist war. So I think no matter if I live in the West or outside of it, I can't support either side with clean conscience; instead, an ethical decision is to stand against imperialism, violence, murder and chauvinism consistently. For example, for me it's clear that in the Ukrainian war the Ukrainian people, in the Palestinian g*n*c*d* the Palestinian people deserve my sympathy, because they are the ones who are the target of violent imperialist aggression. It's really crazy when I see both Western and non-Western people siding with the big power blocks instead, and supporting Russia against Ukraine simply because the US is the common enemy. I think people should really come up with their own positions on these matters, instead of cheering their favourite governments uncritically.
Can i ask you why is "west" talked about like its just one country when its many countries included in the west and for example when usa have invaded a countries many of these countries was not involved? Your right and peoples opinion wherever they are in the world do not matter at all. You cant even make small decisions for your own daily life , you just have to do what the boss says.
im not russian and i dont support russia but you label the war in ukraine imperialist based on what? which other countries has russia expressed its intention to invade? the reason of the war has been announced officially and its the aggression of usa building military bases next to the russian borders. only from the fact that usa is indeed doing that then objectively the war is based on defense. when soviet union tried to install missiles in cuba , usa almost started a war and did not allow them to do it. wasnt usa back them defending itself? why in the exact same situation russia is not doing the same?
Stay better informed ground.news/caspian and access world-wide perspectives on global developments. Subscribe for 40% off unlimited access through my link.
Why America and the west has the right to say what is order and what is not and any nation wants economical independence they invade it , sanction it or make a coup ? White people do you have a revelation from God that he told you what is good and bad? Say something 😊
There are rumours from Israeli sources that you are an azeri on Applebaums payroll. Hopefully you can refute it...
@@mayabergsdottir9622it is true Azerbaijan are white Western worshippers he does not say America is an empire
Title of the video should be "The making of the modern axis of evil"
@@BurnTheKremlin says the white man
Well it's time for the BRICS- New World Order to come up with a default reserve currency or simply go back to gold as the reserve. It will be too chaotic for each country to trade in their respective currencies with the daily change in exchange rates.
All big corps are just a cohort of centralised system working together, and any damage to one can have a dangerous ripple effect on every other one. I learned a long time ago to not trust corporations. Most of my money is in the stock market and my businesses. I keep only what I need to spend in my checking account.
Ironically, these are the conditions in which life-changing money is made by those who remain calm, patient, and take controlled risks. Volatility goes both ways. The banks are in a big crisis. The market looks very shaky. The bigger the red candles, the bigger the green ones. I have made over $280k in the last 14 months by investing through my FA.
@@hasede-lg9hj How can I reach this adviser of yours? because I'm seeking for a more effective investment approach on my savings
How can I reach this adviser of yours? because I'm seeking for a more effective investment approach on my savings
I completely understand where you’re coming from. When I started collaborating with Annette Marie Holt, a fiduciary financial counselor, I really felt the advantages of having that expert guidance. It’s like navigating a boat through turbulent waters; having an experienced captain can make all the difference.
What about EU's purchasing of Russian oil and India's refined Russian oil.....????
What about it? I don't see anything wrong.
Are you a resident of EU?
@@Happy-xi9hl it makes EU lose money, to serve USA interests
@@Happy-xi9hldoesn’t that go against the sanctions hahah
Europeans will always do things like that.
The rest of the Russian oil buyers are not mentioned 😅
Would Have to Mention Europe as Well
Sorry, money is more important than your stupid showdowns.😂
Not important for the narrative
Oil is a commodity, therefore it doesn't really matter who buys it from who. What matters is global supply and demand only .
@@kamilhorvat8290 that's only correct asnwer, Russian oil is sold cheaply and we are buying refined from India, as sanctions intended (reduce profit without removing it from market)
CHINA is not the only country BUYING OIL and ARMS from RUSSIA. Several other countries, like INDIA, are doing the SAME.
Europe.
Yeah, I dont think China needed to be included in this collusion. China isnt getting Russian military technology these days, they have better. China and India are Russias only export markets for quantities of oil.
Yeah but China buys like 70% of it. Don't confuse the BRICS with the CRINKs. Many of us in the BRICS dislike dictatorships as well. Russia and China only pretend to be part of the undeveloped world in order to gather sympathy. But India and Brazil, who actually represent the undeveloped world, are democracies.
@@ncs9753 Much less since the 2022 invasion. And the decline in natural gas imports are worse for Russia than oil. Down like 90%.
@@ibk9987 China buys the vast majority of it. Don't confuse the BRICS with the CRINKs. Many of us in the BRICS dislike dictatorships as well. Russia and China only pretend to be part of the undeveloped world in order to gather sympathy. But India and Brazil, who actually represent the undeveloped world, are democracies, and we are neutral.
"Runs solely through their own territory" - Shows a path through Mongolia, lol
Mongolia probably bought off with a gastap with profitable pricing 😉
Mongolia has no access to the sea, they just get bonuses from both countries
@@eliasloozen7948Mongolia is actually very much a friend of the West though, as well as to South Korea and Japan. They're also very much wary of China and want to keep their independence
Mongolia is Finlandized. They're never gonna go against their larger neighbours to any great extent.
Do you think Mongolia has the power to oppose China and Russia? Mongolia has a huge territory with only 3.5 million inhabitants and with $20.3 billion GDP. To put it in perspective in 2012 Russia alone was spending $48.2 billion on military only... not to mention Mongolia is landlocked by Russia and China. So I think Mongolia has no say if these Super powers decide to use it's land for transporting goods of any type.
The cold war never went away, it just got Luke warm 🫣
The fact that Nato exists n continued to expand the Cold War would never end obviously
Cold war was Capitalism vs Communism fighting for the 3rd world.
This is the non democratic Neo-liberalist and newly emerged world powers vs the democratic Ultra-liberalist neo-colonial establishment. And this time the third world is being replaced by very vocal and more autonomous Global South emerging powers; and it has mostly already chosen a side.
Its more that it got resurrected for profit.
So every interwar period is basically just a cold war?
@@noobymooby-ty8gh well, as they say, since the roman empire, "vis pacem, para bellum". Basically, peace is the time you use to prepare for the next war.
This video is wild. It paints these 4 as unique countries that are tired of US hegemony when it’s the majority of the world that thinks this way. When you bully and sanction more than 1/3 of the world, what do you expect?
Sanctions is not a Crime 🇺🇦🇺🇸🇺🇦🇺🇸🇺🇦🇺🇸
Invading is not a crime @@SpanishUkrainianGuy
@@SpanishUkrainianGuy your kind isn't the brightest
@@SpanishUkrainianGuyyour brain had been sanctioned?
True. Most of those countries still side with america because as of now it is still the egemon of the world. But rest assured that when the time is ripe they will take a slice out of the falling giant
We bringing back the mongol empire with this one
The boys are back in town.
The alignment of the Asian continent is the greatest American blunder of the century. They had so many chances to avoid this. Now a truly nightmare scenario is manifesting before our eyes. BRICs holds over 60% of the world’s population between them. The West is screwed
Irredentism, so hot right now
Mongul empire was the first empire in which women were largely participated in managing the territories. Even many of their council members were women. It was largely because men were always fighting.
So inside the empire everything was ok and soft and in peace. But it was hell outside the main land. Does it remind you of a contemporary empire? Oh yeah, US!
Me and the boys riding through the steppes while bumping “In Praise of Genghis Khan”
Anti American or Anti Western?
It's pretty much the same since EU lobotomites are getting their opinion made in Washington.
Anti NATO unilateralism
same things
Anti Axis of evil
🇮🇱🇺🇸🇬🇧
The European states are pretty much vassals of the US, it's natural to refer to a block by it's leader name.
We live in the 21th century version of the pre ww1 era. Multipolarism, multiple powers signing alliances and heading for a head first collision, the only ingredient missing in the powder keg is the match, a 21th century franz ferdinand. Hoping Im dead wrong.
I wonder how Austria manages to start world war 3, I wonder if they are allowed to perform a hattrick !
You are not, i am guessing major war will start after 2035 to 2040 as that is the year most countries in the world will face demography collapse which in turn cause economy collapse.
In this decade most countries are preparing for that war.
@@delveling hum, I mean it clearly wont be austria that starts it, it was just a comparison. Also, Austria didnt start WW2 even if Hitler is Austrian.
Multipolarism is a Russian fantasy. The don't have the economic strength to seriously challenge the American order, and the idea that they would be more than a junior partner to the Chinese is delusional. It's like the British thinking they would be a major player after WW2.
You mean "Powder Keg", not cake, which sounds delicious. The thing is, despite the internet all of human history/knowledge available instantly to everyone, humans are flawed and will still repeat history's greatest mistakes. And those of us who study history can do little about seeing it unfold again. Kinda like us american voters about to elect a Führer.
You're saying that those four nation historically hated and invaded each other, implying this as a weakness of their alliance, I can say the same about the West historically hated one an other and their wars talks louder than words.
The problem is that china disrespect indian borders today, not 80 years ago.
Good point, the west has had a chance to reorganize their powers after multiple wars. They no longer divided about land, reparations and who has what.
The east has never had this, petty land grab, after petty land grab with no real winner has left them all jaded and power is still divided.. They are in it for their own befits. Meanwhile, the west's allies are losing money helping each other... *Their actions speak louder than words, I agree!*
France and Britain staring to each other...
It's more of the ol saying: the enemy of my enemy is my friend
We are supposed to pretend like Germany and Japan have always been best buddies with the USA 😂 and haven't been occupied since WW2
Two things.
1. Did not mention India's support to Russia.
Mentioned Iran, China and North Korea only.
I’m sure there are others, again, not mentioned.
2. Said, Iran, China and North Korea support, so many, is first in a long time.
Not true. The U.S., the U.K., France, Et Al. routinely support Israel with weapons, intelligence, diplomatic cover and money.
Modi showed far more support to the west than it did Russia and China. They even suspect him selling intel to western intel agencies.
India support what benefits them strategically and economically. They still has good relations with both the west and Russia. In short, India is neutral.
Europe's support to Russia by purchasing Oil
India doesn't support Russia's *special operation* and has multiple times said directly to stop w@r but it just buys cheap oil, since it has good relations with Russia and that same oil goes to Europe. Which basically helps to stabilize global oil prices, since Venezuela and Iran also has many sanctions, so you can't buy oil from them.
Basically it's beneficial for both sides, this way, oil prices still remains manageable and Russia is only earning enough that it can continue it's oil extraction. If India were to support Russia openly and send weapons or military personnels, then you can say India is taking side but as of now, it's just balancing both according to its own benefits.
@@amirkhusairiabdulmajid1623not really, india is far more pro western these days than they are pro russian
The U.S. stance with Israel doesn't help the U.S.' s position in the world. Add to that the U.S.'s own bad foreign policies and the outlook isn't good for U.S. hegemony.
That’s because both sides of the American political isle are funded by AIPAC. Zionists. They will support Israel till the end of time unless this is dealt with.
Actually the usa supports israel because it's literally the middle east shield against Iran
Every foreign policy is bad for someone.
what should be its stance? forget Israel and let muslims butcher jews?
Let's not forget how china and Mexico are now working together now more then even
They are welcome in my country, providing us jobs unlike Amerikkka.
@@axrdeardidoyeah there are no free lunches buddy
@tomasfuzetadaponte6160 but there is such a thing as fair trade, something the US isn't capable of
Free trade isn’t free
@@tomasfuzetadaponte6160Mexico is getting more help from China then America would ever give them.
"... to portray America as a bully,..." and what is America, if not a bully??
America has invented the technologies you are using right now. American has created the world order that has led to the most peaceful and prosperous era in the history.
Me when I conveniently forget that Russia seized Crimea through an invasion and that China regularly bullies non-chinese ships in the South China Sea:
@@YaSunny0409 they also invaded Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam.
@@YaSunny0409peaceful as in right now?
A genocider
Idk what's the point of droning of historical conflicts in these kind of videos. Those "conflicts" in the past means nothing, US and Britain warred before, France and Britain warred before, and let's not even talk about Germany and Japan not too long ago. It's irrelevant.
Is it ? Is history irrelevant ?
You have a lot to learn.
Similar to before ww2
Just on a larger scale
And nuclear weapons are everywhere
We're getting closer to World War 3 no matter what would be the election results in the US next week. 😅😅😅
The difference is, international Zio'nism doesn't have the world's manufacturing capacity.
Ironically it is the nukes that have prevented a 3rd worldwar, or until it will be the cause.
@@AnarchyEnsueswtf is international Zionism? Zionism is about the nation of Israel living in the land of Israel.
@@AnarchyEnsues They also acquired the latest Space Laser Technology, they stole it from aliens I think.
Only America can make that much of anti-American "friends" 😂
They hate US cause They aint US
The picture of the alternative order looks like the biggest nightmare of all US movies since the beginning of Hollywood 😅
American empire is collapsing
Good.
@@daksans6764 "American empire" is such a dumb buzzword. The "American empire" died in 1946 when the Philippines gained independence.
@@Rubber10lol. So when we say that Apple is a business empire, we don't necessarily mean that they have physically conquered territories. You know that...right?
People who think imperialists like Russia and China are part of the developing world, and that aggressively expansionist autocracies have any true interest in the equality of nations besides getting more power for themselves, are either bad faith autocrat enablers or straight up stupid. Autocrats only cry for a "multipolar world" because the free world rules and they wish they weren't prevented from oppressing others. Russia and China just play nice with you now because they have no choice and need allies. If China and Russia ruled the world you'd see what true unipolarity looks like, because they control everyone they can. The USA and the EU rule the world but they let everyone they can be free, that's not unipolarity at all.
I heard professor Marandi take on why russia and iran didn't sign the defense treaty thing yet and he said, they were not even close allies till the Ukraine war that we pushed them together just like we did china and russia...
"we pushed them"? putin decided to attack and pushed himself to pariahs like Iran and North Korea
Persia has a long history of wanting to stand alone. They are, after all an ancient civilization with a fairly unique identity. That had always meant quite a bit of friction with the Russian Empire and the Soviets.
I honestly don't think the Kremlin is in the habit of wanting to rely on Tehran for ANYTHING. Doing so is probably a sign of weakness in Moscow.
That said, it certainly has emboldened Tehran - which is not good for anyone. HIstory shows that when Persia gets greedy, the entire region usually ends up going up in flames.
Ironically, the one thing Persia could do that would be partially welcomed by all sides, would be to handle the situation in Afghanistan. Would it make the West nervous? Sure. But, no one likes the Taliban.
@@lettuceha3368 not true. Iran and russia were close allies since 2016 when both started supporting Assad in Syria
@ true they were allies but not close allies like they are now prof. Marandi said
@@Robespierre-lIwhen it's russia and it's friends helping each other I notice you people love saying "it's weak for Moscow to "rely" on Tehran or Beijing, but when it's America and its friends or allies it's called "strategic cooperation" what a biased joke
8:46 this is propaganda. Spheres of influence mean completely different things to these countries. What do you mean by "China casting a net over Taiwan" because it means something completely different from the relationship between Russia and the Post Soviet states. Under the One China policy that the US adopted,the question of China reunifying with Taiwan by force wasn't even in the discussion. Its so convenient for these western "analysts" to omit decades and decades of continuous provocation and disrespect for already established treaties designed to make everyone live together in peace, and make blanket statements twisting the intentions of their rivals turning them to foes.
Whaaaaat? This channel is propaganda ?
Ohhh I get it now China will peacefully liberate Taiwan like Russia did to Crimea
I know right. I hate how much empty rhetoric there is in these videos contain. "they possess the power to tip the world off its axis", what does that mean? It's like me saying that I have the power do send ripples down the fabric of the universe. In concrete terms what exactly do you think these four dictators have the power to do?
What makes all of us, here in the West laugh is that we live, rent free in the heads of these despot lunatic leaders........24/7..... 365 days a year!!😂😅
The channel:🇦🇿
The content:🇷🇺🇨🇳🇮🇷🇰🇵
The Langauge: 🇬🇧🇺🇸
The Audience: 🇮🇳
Audience: Crying "India India"
_Obsessed with India_
_can't sleep without crying/complaining about India once a day_
i don't understand why they like to be humiliated on the internet every single day 😢@@SimhaArya-zu7vo
1.5?bn rakeshh 👳🏿♀️👳🏿♀️👳🏿♀️
Good summary
Mr. Worldwide
India, Singapore and some other nations are on both camps.
They are on their own side !
They're neutral but India ought to ditch the US for their own good imo
Both are profiteering from both sides but would go with the US if forced to choose or in all out war.
@@user-jt3dw6vv4x then the US will switch support to Pakistan in that case, i find it hard to believe that India and Pakistan would be allies in such a global conflict. Logic dictates that NATO would pressure one of the sides to join them. In any case they would exploit this weakness in relations.
@@gabor-zsoltbenedek9420they are welcome to but pakistan is a dumpster fire , US would do itself no favors and technically they do sent military aid to Pakistan to.this day for " counter terrorism " , isn't that ironic ?
At 4:09 this video shows a complete distortion of reality. The post World War II order did not mean that Russia had to become subservient or obedient United States unilaterally. Instead, the United States claimed that there would be United Nations and that China and Russia would have veto any actions by the west that would be adverse to those two powers. That was in recognition that they were equally important partners in the world and their sovereignty could be protected by votes at United Nations the US has actually circumvented the postwar world order, which is to go only through the United Nations for all the kind of activity that are going on. At the time of the gulf wars, we still believed that we needed you and authorization to militarily go in to Iraq. US officials won that approval from the United Nations, including nations like Russia and China, but since then United States unilaterally broke the world order when it bombed unilaterally Serbia against the objections of China and Russia. During that Serbian conflict, a Chinese embassy was destroyed in Serbia killing approximately as I recollect 12 Chinese nationals, so the criminal against the world order wasn’t Russia or China. The crime again with that attack on Serbia by President Clinton without you and approval or authorization. Also was an attack that made no sense. It was an attack on a civilian society, destroying all of its electrical power, grids, and civilian infrastructure, and you knew the actual time was a Islamic terrorist organization that the Serbian people were fighting. And the effect of what we did LA gain foothold inside the country. And the solution we had was that we then invited the UN to come in and police the country. So this narrator has a narrow focus that ignores the responsibility of the United States for destroying the post World War II world order, which gave no hegemony to the United States. And now the nations like Russia and China will act in their own unilateral interest just like the United States did when it broke the world war post World War III in the actions against Serbia.
Thats horrific but I'd like to remind you before that conflict, Russia interjected itself militarily after Afghanistan refused to become a Communist vassal for the USSR in 1979...
West is still innocent for we did not set the precedent, good luck though, we aren't afraid to become the savages you claim us to be.
@ Russia is not ussr.
@@douglasdeltondo7852At this point, I'm not sure that argument has any merit beyond semantics.
"Against Serbia" lmao. You freaks expose yourselves all the time.
@ It’s not an argument. It’s simply the facts. The United States has itself unilaterally withdrawn from any necessity to get permission from the United Nations to go to war. This is not a small issue is we asked the whole world to come to this organization with the premise that would bring world peace and the subs in that we would all be that principle. But how many boys are we engaged in since then without any success I might add. in Iraq we killed 1.5 million people come including 500,000 children in the vein and hopeless effort to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. We needed the feeding ground for Isis in the whole world was a threat of that organization. Colin Powell‘s famous speech very held at the vile of anthrax at the United Nations should be a constant reminder that in that era was the last time we ever thought we needed to consult with the world and get a joint agreement that this is a worthy cause. Since then we’re back to completely unilaterally almost every war without you and approval. We seek selective approval from smaller organizations likeNATO. So we created the New World order and then we abandoned it ourselves. What does that tell you?
I plan to retire at 62 in another country outside the US that is free, safe and very cheap with a high quality of life. I could fully just rely on only my SS if I wanted to when that times arrives but I'll also have at least one pension, a 403 (b) and a very prolific lnvestment account with my Abby Joseph Cohen my FA. Retiring comfortably in the US these days is almost impossible.
I went from no money to lnvest with to busting my A** off on Uber eats for four months to raise about $20k to start trading with Abby Joseph Cohen. I am at $128k right now and LOVING that you have to bring this up here
How can i reach this Abby Joseph Cohen, if you don't mind me asking? I've known her by her reputation at Goldman Sachs
@@KhristyDrysdaleWell her name is 'ABBY JOSEPH COHEN SERVICES'. Just research the name. You'd find her details to set up an appointment.
Abby Joseph Cohen Services has really set the standard for others to follow, we love her here in Canada 🇨🇦 as she has been really helpful and changed lots of life's
The very first time we tried, we invested $7000 and after a week, we received $9500. That really helped us a lot to pay up our bills.
At a global scale, an order where similarly powerful countries with differences can come together is preferrable to a centralized order where one power obviously dictates what their other "allies" "should" do.
Right. Coz that didnt lead to a world war before 1914
If you think the Russians would be anything but a junior to the Chinese in the long term you are very much mistaken.
Sure, because when there was parity between England and France and Spain and Portugal and the Netherlands, that had a great outcome for every other country in the world.
The alignment of the Asian continent is the greatest American blunder of the century. They had so many chances to avoid this. Now a truly nightmare scenario is manifesting before our eyes. BRICs holds over 60% of the world’s population between them. The West is screwed
@@nocrtname Sounds like a European problem.
The World Is Tired Of America's Economic Sanctions ... 💯%
ah yes putin's wannabe imperial dictatorship totally speaks for and represents the entire world bro
@@RandomUser6002 95% of the worlds population isn't in the US. Russia is only 1.77% of that.
@@TheRebelAllianceAreTerrorists I never said that "95% of the world's population is in the US", don't twist my words. I said that Putin's regime doesn't represent the entire world.
True
@@TheRebelAllianceAreTerrorists TH-cam deleted my comment, but what I meant to say is that you're twisting my words. I NEVER said that most of the world population is in the US.
I just said that Putin doesn't speak for the entire world, and that the world does not revolve around him.
Anti american? Nah, more like anti globalist. Regular citizens of Russia, India and China has more common with a regular american then you think.
Definitely not. China is the leading competitive economic power and they are ALL about globalism. Have you not noticed what they have done since they turned their back on communist economic policies in their 1993 economic reform? They have become wealthy again BECAUSE of how they fully embraced global capitalism and exploited every opportunity it gave them.
There is no major power in the world that does not engage with the reality of global capitalism. There's no alternate economic system being proposed. There are only a handful of reactionary political movements that are pushing protectionism again. BUt these are populist movements and they are ALL in the West
Think again. It's not an easy subject to wrap your head around, but you'll get there.
Except Russia wants to expand to their former soviet glory which can only happen through military imperial expansion. Same with china with taiwan and other regions. They are not anti globalist, they just want to be in charge themselves
It's time for the US to learn some humility .
Makes me wonder how much closer Israel and Ukraine will become in reaction to Iran's increasing involvement with this new Axis.
Ah, nothing like a bit of cross-continental teamwork to prep us for World War 3: The Sequel Nobody Asked For. With all these alliances, it feels less like geopolitics and more like a dystopian Avengers crossover. Guess we’re all just extras in this new blockbuster…
See you there bro!
It really does, doesnt it? Plus the possible a.i. Takeover in 20-30 years from now, doesnt paints a nice picture for the future. Atleast weed is now legal in germany. High into the end. Have fun brothers and sisters evrywhere. Maybe peace and love in a second hippy era will save us🤗.
@@HedgehogZone We will fight, high af but we will fight.
Absolutely! That's what people don't want to realize.
Honestly, the only country that could benefit from ww3 is the US. From their perspective they can see it as the only way out of its own decadent decent into global irrelevance. But I think they'll lose. They can go out with a bang or a whimper. Time will tell. I hope it's a whimper.
India gets more oil from Russia than China does
And what about the EU they still get oil from Russia
Indian oil imports from Russia have been dropping fast in the last 3 months. The new sections seem to be taking effect. Russian exports have dropped 30% from 12 months ago
Not true
China is the largest Importer
Then it's the EU(yes EU still buys oil DIRECTLY)
That is literally just false information. China is the largest consumer of Russian oil and then the EU.
Dude China's economy is 5 times India's economy....China literally shares physical land borders with Russia...India doesn't....China-Russia have energy pipelines....India-Russia have no connecting energy pipelines and all their trade largely go through the old Suez Canal route..
Quote: America IS a bully. They can invade Iraq and no consequences. Russia invades Ukraine (with far better reasoning) and the west tries to destroy them.
This suits America, and Britain, Europe as to strengthens their weapons industry. As they say "war is good for business"
Ukraine gave up nuclear arms to guarantee it would not be invaded by russia, there was no such thing in Iraq.
Russia plans to annex and incorporate the country into its federal apparatus, this was not the case in iraq
The United states was retentively successful in conquering the land, quickly. this was not the case in Ukraine.
Quote: *No one has ever forced a country to join NATO. Russia handles all of that for them.*
@lubu4u312 really.
You obviously haven't read enough of Nulands engagement into Ukraine for the US state department. Thank goodness she's now gone.
Bit Nato have meddled all through the far eastern Europe and beyond looking for an enemy and total hegemony.
I'm fact I would reckon IF Russia did absorb Ukraine, and i don't think that's the intent, then it would be in a far better condition and state than Iraq and UK left Iraq.
Yes Saddam ruled with an iron first, but Iraq is now but a mess of conflicting militia with Iran the largest supporter.
You see Nato never wanted peace, and that's proven, as now they get their population to ensure mass military spend ups to fight a new bogey man.
Why would anyone want to join Nato...... perhaps they have that right, but history does mean something and it's nieve to ignore it.
@@lubu4u312 Russia never planned to take any territory from Ukraine. Even Crimea would've stayed with them, had they not tried to take over Russian naval base, stationed there. Russia just has no other choice now. Since Ukraine refuses to peace talk, the only choice is to advance until they surrender.
They love to claim how they got attacked "unprovoked", but at the same time, in the countless interviews they gave, they admit that they DID provoke Russia. I can explain what they tried to achieve and how. It's not a short story, but if you realy care, stay with me.
Ukraine was always split to WEST and EAST, each with polar opposite political views and cultures. Even the language was different. A lot of westerners couldn't speak Russian and their Ukrainian sounded more like Polish, while easterners spoke "surzhik" (a mix of Russian and Ukrainian, but neither). Westerners were pro EU, while easterners pro Russian. They could barely understand each other, despite living in the same country. Some Ukrainian oligarchs decided to take it upon themselves to UNITE the country, so through a collaboration with foreign agents they caused a coup. Then they started to FORCE a new ideology on everyone. Since the new ideology was 99% pro West, easterners rebeled. It turned into a civil war. Since the now so-called "separatists" were pro Russian and had roots in Russia, there's no way Russia wouldn't say something about it. Russia spent years trying to convince Ukraine to do things differently, through diplomacy, but Ukraine had none of that. They wanted to unite the country, and they wanted it NOW. Even if this meant that half the country needs to be forced to accept the new ways and be prosecuted or k*lled if they disagree. Since Ukraine had an overwhelming support of the global West, they even thought that they can take over the Russian naval base in Crimea. Crimea was always a shared territory. It wasn't just Ukrainian. Maybe Ukraine did that to bootlick NATO, maybe it was a dirrect request/order from the US, or they were just fools, who knows? The fact is that they gave up on being NEUTRAL. When you say that Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons to preserve peace, that was only a part of that agreement. Ukraine had to stay neutral, but it sided with NATO. It doesn't matter that much if some other EU coutnry joins NATO, but Ukraine, Kazahstan or Belarus absolutely can not do that. It will shift the weight on the global power scales, endangering the peace and stability. It's dangerous to Russia.
It's not Russia's whim, despite what your propaganda says. Despite what this channel says. Russia operates with surgical percision, trying not to harm civilians as much as possible. Ukrainians are allowed to visit their beloved, if they end up as prisoners of war. In the areas that Russia protected, new schools are being built, new roads, infrastructure. Things that Ukraine never did properly for its eastern part. Yet Ukraine drops shells on parks and beaches and generaly acts like a terrorist group. At the very start of the civilian war, back when Russia was even GIVING MONEY to Ukraine to help rebuild after the revolution, Kiev decided to launch missiles from the plane, targeting civilians in the east of Ukraine. There was another instance, where they m*ssacared unarrmed easter Ukrainian people in Odessa's trade union house. There are videos of it, look it up. It's just nuts. Your media won't show you theese thigns. They want you to hate Russia. I hope this reaches you and doesn't get blocked -_-
@@lubu4u312
How about now?
Ukraine is threatening russia with nuclear usage?
Russia plans to annex ukraine? Stop reading so much buzzfeed.
USA was relatively quick to defeat Iraq because Iraq was severely weakened by the gulf war.
Moreover ukraine has massive fundings as well as arms given to them by USA and EU. You saw what happened in Vietnam with you guys right? That was literally just 3 countries against you but you guys still lost.
Russia has been dealing with the problem of being surrounded by nato allies. That's why they took such step
You can't compare Iraq to Ukraine.
Iraq was a genocidal and totalitarian dictatorship under Saddam Hussein who launched "speshul milituhree operashuns" against Kuwait and Iran.
"Iraq under the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party saw severe violations of human rights. Secret police, state terrorism, torture, mass murder, genocide, ethnic cleansing, rape, deportations, extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, assassinations, chemical warfare, and the destruction of the Mesopotamian marshes were some of the methods Saddam Hussein and the country's Ba'athist government used to maintain control. Saddam committed crimes of aggression during the Iran-Iraq War and the Gulf War, which violated the Charter of the United Nations. "
(From Wikipedia)
You CANNOT call America a "bully" when you're fanboying over dictatorships such as Putin's Russia and Saddam's Iraq and try to make them look like the good guys
damn the photos of putin, khameini, kim and xi when placed in a circle, looks like sharingan
Well sharingan just literally means spiral eyes
we're cooked if Putin unlocks the mangekyou 😭
@@ramansinghal5181 They got the secrets of the sharingan before Laden was taken out by Uchiha team six
@@JS-bp7bu 😂
@@JS-bp7bu 😂
*I'm glad you made this video,* it reminds me of my transformation from a nobody to good home, $89k biweekly and a good daughter full of love..
Please how ?
It's Maria Angelina Alexander doing she's changed my life. A BROKER- like her is what you need.
$356K monthly is something you should feel differently about....
Lovely! I enjoyed it like I enjoy a $100k monthly around the turn!!!
I know that woman (Maria Angelina Alexander)
If you were born and raised in new York you'd know too, she's my family's Broker for 3yrs till now and a very good one if you asked me. No doubt she is the one that helped you get where you are!!!!
Multipolarity rising
when you cant hide truth anymore, you start by watering it down.
History has proven that these kinds of alliances "under the circumstances" do not go well.
Agreed, 4 countries with different views, cultures and ambitions. Dont see this going further than russias and germanys "alliance" duriing ww2
“ to portray USA as a bully” Meanwhile trying to portray China as a bull. How many wars china started in the past 40 years? How many wars USA started in the past 40 years?
This channel is pure propaganda
Ukraine once scammed china in a very very big program right before this war started. China already showed the mercy by deciding not to join the war
usa is always fighting against terrorists lol
china hasn't had the ability to start wars. you are a fool if you think they won't when they are able.
CaspianReport has become less and less a geopolitical analysis and more and more a pro-west narrative maker -- just saying it, not picking a side.
Real
Maybe pro west is the right way objectively. When you have an imperialist war monger in Russia and China bullying its neighbors too. Like you can’t honestly think Russia and China are the good guys in any sense comparatively. The west is messed up and needs to improve but at least we aren’t as bad as these guys
Always has been
That's a silly reaction. And you are most definitely "picking a side" with that comment.
its part of the western propaganda and marketing. they hide their identity, they dont clearly pick a side and they pretend to be objective. yt is full of channels like this.
Americans did this to themselves.
I personally are fed up with USA and its warmongering around the world.
warmongering?
yeah bro it's totally America that invaded Ukraine, buddy.
The fact that there are people in the West cheering this is terrifying.
western prosperity and comfort has made many of its citizens into idiotic zombies who know nothing about the world and are susceptible to propaganda from dictatorships.
It's not a coincidence. These people are bombarded with kremlin backed propaganda. All American right wing media is peddling pro kremlin and anti NATO bs and just last month it turned they were paid like 100k per episode or something ridiculous, by russian shell companies. Same with far left/tankie accounts, that also do a fair share of soviet revisionism. And yeah, when I was 20 I believed in even dumber stuff, zo I can't blame youngsters and boomers for falling for it. Alongside with uneducated right wingers trashy people who probably didn't finish highschool. This is the demographics. Oh and Musk supporters, not sure what kind of demographics that is.
Yes. If they trash talked any of those governments the way they do their own here, their life would take a painful turn real fast. People take democracy for granted, they won't know what they have until they have lost it, then the lamenting will come.
The alignment of the Asian continent is the greatest American blunder of the century. They had so many chances to avoid this. Now a truly nightmare scenario is manifesting before our eyes. BRICs holds over 60% of the world’s population between them. The West is screwed
Why? I'm glad our global nonsense is ending. You think we all like forever wars and watching trash be handed our wealth?
America turning isolationist is the best thing for everyone, no more global police bs.
All my bros hate Omerica
Don't forget, if Trump wind next week, the United States will be joining this Axis.
Lol, you think? That would be wyld :D
Well, they'll *tell* him he can join and then they'll take major advantage of him because he's an idiot. Their main goal is less American influence. If Trump becomes president then they basically have a dumbass whose policies amount to "I want America to have less influence too!"
That is nonsense. Dude is clearly anti China.
United States joining the Axis against the united states is such a big brain play only the United States could do
Trump will destroy the Chinese economy
based, let's freaking go
Down with the Gay American Empire
Weird you say that in English. I doing think you get what happens after
@@Popovich16 what happens is that America stops importing gay sex, feminism, and diversity across the planet, which is awesome.
@@Popovich16 if they win geo politics they wont stay allies because they dont realy like each other it just usa and west has been a vermene in this world who tried to shape world into globalism all other nations sence it unless there polticians have been filled with puppets they want mutlipolar world which is safer for small nation in africa and south america who doesnt like west culture world is just realy weird iran or china winning is bad i dont about china poltics they dont seem to have intrest inshaping other internal affairs but who knows but still i fills bit wired they are more business dealrs of infulence for now but best thing would usa gets strong west changes east get stronger no world war happens cause of taiwane and multipolar world happens and stays in stalemate
@@Popovich16 nothing much, actually. People mostly want to be left to their devices.
The world is fed up with the US.
If you look closely, those 4 countries have nothing in common, American push them together!
You mean other that that they are all oppressive authoritarian dictatorships with territorial expansion planned for the future? I dunno, that seems like a non-insignificant thing to have in common.
Almost how russia pushed 80% of europe into a military alliance that opposes russia.
Funny how it be sometimes
Sweden and Finland are not in NATO in your maps.
TLDR: Mongolian Empire 2.0
Didn't they conquered all of them except north korea
When
Ironically with Mongolia being squashed in the middle and having no influence at all.
Mongolia is not a real Mongolia, but a pure Mongolia with a golden family in Inner Mongolia, China.
It`s the "Revolutiopn problem" isn`t it? It`s very easy with an oppressive force giving you no room looming above you to say "screw that guy we`re teaming up!" but as soon as you get a little bit of power you now suddenly have to deal with the fact that aside from hating the big guy on top, you don`t have that much in common...
well in ww2 big guy was hitler, russia and uk who are eternal rivals united about hatred of that guy despite having nothing in common and esablished current world order.
Maybe American being the main barrier in these 4 spaces is part of the problem. Why aren't any of these people standing up for themselves?
If you think about it, all of the pastic crap we buy originally comes from Russia. The Chinese plastic is made from Russian oil, possibly assembled in North Korea, then shipped on Norwegian freighters, which are registered in the Marshall Islands.
What a wonderful world this could have been...
The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy. No more, no less.
Thanks for your content My very Love from Iran may peace come every where
Peace and Love from New York state backwoods
@@ALIREZA.B-td4wr Don't be so naive. He wants iranian Azerbajdzjan to separate from Iran. Which wont never happen ofc
@@mayabergsdottir9622 Regards from London, Dream on Persian empire!!!
@@atillahanartagan2248 Persians, Azeri, Kurds, Baloch, Lur, Laks, Bakhtiari, Tadjiks, Afghans and many many more. The Iranian civilization is much more than just Persian. Cheers! You two my friend!
@@mayabergsdottir9622 Turks ruled iranains for part of seljuk ottoman dynasties
All the anti-western westerners screeching in the comments. The irony is palpable.
this guy is azaerbaijani, not everyone is western here
You are mistaken.
Many do not dislike the West. Instead, they love the West, especially what it once stood for. What they actually dislike are dysfunctional and destructive Western governments.
the people that live in the west and realize and admit that the west is the cancer of the world are the only ones that have dignity in the west. the rest are trash that enjoy the loot.
It's not about creating an anti-American world order. It's about creating a world order of development and cooperation. Of course it can be anti-American but only if the USA will continue fighting against cooperation and dialogue
"world order of dEvELoPmEnT aNd cOoPeRatIoN"
>North Korea
>Russia
>China
>Iran
I don't know about you but these 4 are all dictatorships, and the only one that even slightly appears to not want to violently conquer it's neighbors via military means s is China.
And they (specifically referring to Russia, North Korea and Iran) represent anything but development and cooperation bro...
Like how russia is developing and cooperating in ukraine? Or how they did i chechnya.
Maybe its closer to how china is developing and cooperating minority populations.
And north korea... you get the point
@@nuhardusnytitdigivafflan8511 fr
troub thinks a world order of authoritarian and totalitarian dictatorships is a world order of "dEvElOpMeNT aND cOoPErAtiOn" when those nations represent the total opposites of that
"development and cooperation"
So called "wOrLd OrDer Of dEvEloPmEnT aNd cOoPerAtIoN" being only made out of authoritarian/totalitarian dictatorships that only pursue their own agendas, which represent the total opposite of those ideals.
Get outta here, I highly doubt you would want to live under Putin's jackboot, let alone Kim Jong Un's.
BRICS is the future
None of them would try to develop others. In my ignorant idea, there would be the day, with technology high enough in 5 or next decade, people around the world would shift into fewer locations and forming large communities. Not just because of war, economic, demography, but also because of the climate change also shift into another new pacing period. There might be no country like this world map any more. So, in my opinion, NATO, or BRICS are the solutions.
Nope
Brazil and India are the future. Russia is a dying empire. China is a declining nation, and South Africa is already a failed state
BRICS is a joke 😂😂😂
Ok guy named "Ayush", whatever you say. 🤣
This channel is always salty for some reason. 🤷🏻♂️
Those old enough remember the Soviet Bloc, which was impressive in scale, involving not only present-day Russia but also many other countries that are now independent and pursuing their own interests. Yet, it ultimately failed. The union of states with structural issues is merely the combination of corruption and ineptitude; if you tie together 10 sinking boats they will all sink, they won't float.
Russia and China are both on paths of decline-not only due to internal decay but also because of failing policies and even demographic crises. While obstacles to American power exist, it’s unlikely that mere hatred or anti-Americanism would significantly impede the U.S. when pressured. America is uniquely positioned as a unified federation with the rare ability to feed its population, sustain energy needs, produce fertilizers, and more. America can survive independently, while China cannot even meet its own food needs.
half of the americans are junkies, usa sells weapons to other countries while china sells infrastructure and goods, usa economy is based on corruption, debt and infinite money printing while china's economy is based on production, usa has the highest debt without any intention to pay it of. historically and purely number wise usa is in decline. propaganda cannot beat the numbers.
All the dictators get along well what a surprise 😂
Lol they weren’t calling Putin a dictator in the 2000s when he was friendly with the west now you expect us to believe he is 😂
The problem with "enemy of my enemy" logic is that it's often the only thing uniting certain groups and thus tends to fall apart at the first speed bump. Ideologically, they have nothing in common other than "the USA is on top and I want to be on top instead". An alliance where all members want to be the top dog will constantly work against itself
The alignment of the Asian continent is the greatest American blunder of the century. They had so chances to avoid this. Now a truly nightmare scenario is manifesting before our eyes. BRICs holds over 60% of the world’s population between them. The West is screwed
Bingo.....the Multipolar angle that China is pushing for is only to gain allies against the West......China still has ambition of claiming Russian territory long term......but first they want to cooperate with Russia to get the bigger problem out the way which is the US.......
Only china is capable of being the top dog with russia coming in second
The same logic can be applied to the Western US-EU alliance....the Europeans don't exactly agree on the "top" position..
@ameyas7726 I don't think anyone in the western world is really arguing over who the global power is. If you're referring to France retaining direct control over the NATO forces it contributes, which is the only thing I can think of that you might be referring to, that hardly makes a difference as they are still part of NATO and regularly participate in joint military exercises with other NATO Nations. Naturally, sovereign Nations will pursue policies that will most benefit its own constituents but being that the Western world is fairly united in terms of morals, principles, and goals, the competition for "top dog" is barely relevant and if anything makes the alliance stronger.
Meanwhile, with this anti-American alliance, sure there's cooperation for a temporary common goal but there's a good argument to be made that ultimately the support really only benefits the selfish goals of individual Nations. Think about it, if Russia wins in Ukraine, then China and Russia gain power in that NATO's credibility is reduced and it's a win-win for them both. If Russia loses in Ukraine, then China still wins because a (theoretically) powerful and bellicose Nation on their border takes a MASSIVE hit to their power and credibility and loses sway over many, if not all, of the Central Asian nations they've historically held sway over, leaving a China that hasn't been weakened by war and sanctions to step into the power vacuum and take Russia's place as the hegemon, growing their sphere of influence. Which as anyone knows, has been China's main goal for at least the last 20 years
The Four Horsemen of geopolitics!
USA has left reasons to hate her, but if the alternative is a world ruled by China and Russia... With this geopolitical situation plus climate change this century looks very bad...
Alternative is still better than American hegemony
@@daksans6764 Yeah bro being ruled by Russia where you get arrested for holding blank signs, having an entire cult of personality around Putin, where freedom of speech is non-existent and no social media platforms are allowed because "muh foreign terrorist agents" is TOTALLY better than living in the flawed democracy of America where you can vote, you can say whatever you want and there aren't personality cults around the "glorious leader".
Great logic, buddy.
If China and Russia do get this powerful one day, do you think there won't be an equivalent of a "civil rights movement" in these countries? When people get rich they would demand more freedom.
the world is not working with the usa mindset that someone has to rule the world. no other country has that mindset.
I'm skeptical about the cohesiveness of NATO. European interests are increasingly divergent from US foreign policy. US-led sanctions against Russia and China harms European countries while it benefits the US. A direct NATO-Russia war brings destruction and catastrophe to Europe and Asia, while the US survives unscathed because these wars are waged on European soil and not on the US mainland. This must be an acute realization in Europe. If not yet, then I hope it they start to think about whether NATO is a force for peace or war, and whether they really want to be caught up in this type of dangerous alliance complexes that is reminiscent of 20th century militaristic "diplomacy".
0:27 Russia has used Israeli weapons in its war against Ukraine too 😉.
How many countries are in Nato supplying Ukraine? More than 50 so what is the point
The point is, the NATO is FAILING.
the video is about an anti-American alliance of small-dick Asian totalitarians. what's the point of your comment?
More than 50 countries couldn't supply nearly as much shells to Ukraine as one North Korea to Russia
Americans are really upset at this video.
"Shared hatred creates a fragile alliance, at best."
Disagree
let me take your stuff, and imma play as a victim coalition
Both iran and china where invaded or had their goverment couped vy western countries unprovoked
@@Galomortalbr both tibet and kurdistan were invaded, whats your point ?
@@louisthomas3368 that you are a god damn hypocrite
@@Galomortalbr philippines also had a dictatorship organized by usa.
Note: All four these countries know the difference between a man and a woman.
true, but they also don't know something.....their place
I think they do. Thats why their standing up.@@leejackson3268
@@leejackson3268 they know their place and they want to take it back from the Western freeloaders😊
extra note: All four of these countries are dictatorships that have no regard for the well-being of their own people
And sadly, the comment section of this video is flooded by their keyboard warrior/bot divisions.
All countries know that difference. Just leftwing radicals screaming bullocks.
But those 4 countries seem to have a hard time with free speech and wellbeing of their populations
Wishful thinking 😄
Good journalism,Very good…. Non bias
Unlike the others, China has a large population of rich people. I don’t think they want to risk losing this by becoming a pariah state. Who will buy their stuff at high prices?
You will regardless
富人不能控制中国，权利只属于共产党
i dont think the chinese care about the 300m of usa when there is 6 more billion people to sell. just lol.
Caspian Report ❌
Copium Report ✅
😂
True, wanted to hear more about BRICS and how it's shitting on the G7's GDP by 5.5%.
@karolisbareika8306 That argument isn't really relevant. Especially considering the OECD includes those G7 nations and it dwarfs BRICS.
To only focus on the G7, is to only focus on the top 7 of a 38 nation economic alliance.
So why do you have 13 plus comments on this channel if it’s “copium”?
@@KSmithwick1989G7 is weak
@daksans6764 Funny, that's your retort. After I pointed out, G7 is just the top 7 of the OECD. There is no dispute. BRICS is not even comparable to the OECD economic block.
I googled PAX and it means PEACE, so I'm confused by the term PAX AMERICANA. Let's see--Vietnam, Yugoslavia / Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, South America (just too many to list individually) and now Israel-Hamas-Lebanon, and of course, Ukraine. You understand my confusion?
vietnam-> chinese and communist were massacaring people there
afganistan-> taliban gave shelter to bin laden after 9/11
iraq-> saddam did try to make nukes once and israel f$ucked his plan but bush is son of a wh0re for lying about WMD
Syria-> US entered syria after 2014 sept, after !S!S became threat, before that it was weapon business
South America-> I dont know much about it
Israel-> you must support right side, besides hezbulla and hamas are not government they are terr0rist organization or military wing
Russia-> well it was russia who attacked first and US is selling weapons not actively on war with Russia
The majority of those wars weren't started by the Americans.
it means relative peace. there is no such thing as peace between nations.
In this context it means a geopolitical order, not necessarily peace.
Excellent world report ! Thank you so much . 75 in California
Interesting you didn't manage to mention India, which is buying Russian oil and selling to the EU. Plus BRICS summit as well.
oh no country with 1.3 billion people is looking for cheap oil,
oh no
As an Indian, I think I prefer that. We should and need to focus on ourselves and our interests. It is not in our interest to fall into Russian or American or Chinese wars.
love the videos!
The aim is multipolarity not an "anti-American word order". A number of major and regional powers that have had their interests under attack by the west under US leadership for some time, have a common interest in opposing the US obsession with global domination. These countries also have conflicting and divergent interests too. These powers respect the differences in each other's interests and avoid the use of war or force in dealing with these conflicts. For example Iran and Russia have common interests in Syria but conflicting interests over Israel or Islam within Russia, but they do business and avoid conflict. China and India have tensions over border disputes, but work together over BRICS issues. Conflict is contained to a minimal level by various devices such as not using fire arms in border skirmishes. The ultimate aim is the restoration of some global BALANCE OF POWER such as existed in the Cold War, so that one power, The USA does not go mad with the power imbalance and start attacking with military force any state that opposes its local domination over their region. It is to restore peace to the world by ending the "Monopolar" period during which the US and its allies resorted eagerly to military force in pursuit of their self-interests and were systematically destabilising and destroying the world bit by bit.
China doesn't like or want multipolarity, China would prefer to be the only dominant superpower alongside USA for the long run untill eventually it becomes the number dominant superpower in the world. This "multipolarity" bullshit only comes from Putin's Russia wich China is considering a junior partner.
This is a misguided aim. The world is currently more stable and prosperous than it has been in all of human history.
@@nocrtname inequality is the greatest it’s ever been in human history. There are more poor people compared to the elites than there’s ever been. Just because people are getting buy & have smart phones doesn’t mean the world is thriving.
@@nocrtname yeah, not because of the US but because of science and technology
@@catadoxas The global reduction in military spending due to the US' role in preventing annexation by foreign military conquest (none in the past 80 years, globally) has allowed additional funding into R&D, as well as healthcare, infrastructure, and education. This funding, historically, would have gone into defense spending.
What will countries like Pakistan and Turkiye do? Who have ties with both USA and China/Russia?
To be an order, it would imply having the power to tell those who don't want to be in that order to do what they want.
That order might never come to be. What you were looking for is the word anti-American alliance or anti-western alliance.
Aslong it would be just Iran, China, Russia and North Korea i would not be too concerned. More important might be the BRICS economic treaties, if they would change in ways that would allow Russia to avoid sanctions and also keep trade and ressources from western nations. Russia is already trying to influence BRICs memebers to challange the petro dollar, but sofar i don't see anything happening besides the wishes from Russia.
Indeed. Nothing is happening. th-cam.com/video/3pHr5yzLEHA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=UXhS4Q956l-lKjXz
The alignment of the Asian continent is the greatest American blunder of the century. They had so chances to avoid this. Now a truly nightmare scenario is manifesting before our eyes. BRICs holds over 60% of the world’s population between them. The West is screwed
the greek ships transport the russian oil and gas under usa sanctions and europe is still buying. according to western media propaganda yes russia has the biggest problem of the world, but according to numbers its business as usual.
This alliance is made up of the last nations you would want to be born in.
west？
Funny thing is life in those nations are better than the west
Nah, I’d still prefer China to Afghanistan. North Korea is shit though.
@@qinghaoxia7276 No, buddy. The "east".
im proud i was born in the west. i also had a friend here in the west and one night he took his dog out for a walk and he never came back, he was shot in the head from behind by a cop because he was just running next to the dog. after that the cop got a promotion and obviously no court about the murder.
living in the west is amazing.
well done America !
Yes the soviets were bad but the collapse of the USSR was horrible. There was no one to keep the USA in check.
any REPORTER should UNDERSTAND and fully describe TERM - BEING IMPARTIAL ... Something that this reporter is MISSING, look at US/UK actions around the World
How did u not mention BRICS
"Side eye" is a good description.
Reading through some of the comments, people seem to think that living in a dictatorship or theocracy is better than living in a democratic nation.
You really gonna pretend the facade of "democracy" didn't fall of in the last year? People have been beaten, imprisoned, censored, lost their jobs. For the grand crime of calling out that one criminal state for what they are doing. I can't even name the state or the crime here because my comment will be hidden.
We don't live in a democracy. That's just a veneer. It's an oligarchy.
What's the difference?
You believe 🇺🇸 is democratic? 😂😂😂😂 oligarchies are worse than autocracies. Clueless westoids
You believe 🇺🇸 is democratic? 😂😂😂😂 oligarchies are worse than autocracies. Clueless westoids
Four horsemen of the apocalypse right there... A different world is on the way... Be prepared.
Yep the world needs to get more deft at diplomacy. This war business is not liked by anyone
Funny that when USA and the West are just terrorist states
Russian disinformation trolling here illustrates the obvious: that a post-American order would be hell on earth.
Silence, westoid.
Nice opinion. Unfortunately, your mom is a successful enterpreneur on OF.
shut up zogbot
is this russia in the room with us? or go back to trump.... orange man bad 😅
Anything is batter than current American order of mass degeneracy and corporate greed.
THIS is what we should have avoided since the beggining. We needed Russia to still being european. Now we're alone.
Correct
Russia had pro-Western rhetoric until 2007, at which time NATO began to expand at least twice. why? Russia did not threaten anyone then and was friendly with the entire West. The West ignored all of Putin’s warnings and here we are. the whole reason is the West’s disrespect for Russian interests, and their interests contradict Western interests, but either you respect this or you are at enmity.
@ shut p
@@GokhanYlmaz-eg7jf You're saying "expand", implying that NATO was militarily invading other nations.
*cough cough*
No, that was not the case.
As about the "Russia did not threaten anyone" part, that's also not true since Russia invaded some of it's neighbors before that (specifically Chechnya and Georgia)
Plus when you join NATO, you don't get foreign tanks in your streets, you join voluntarily, signing paperwork and what not.
While in order to join the likes of Russia, you get foreign tanks in your streets. Do with that information as you will.
the funniest of all is finland for example that believes that russia who is neighbor is more likely to throw nuclear bombs to them rather than usa. yes im so stupid as an american to fill my borders and my air with radioactivity... the lack of common sense in the west is amazing.
Thank GOD, the U.S is getting the test of its own medicine.
These countries will do what they do best, blame each other for their own problems.
west？
This “friendship” between an Islamic state and the “infidels” of Russia and Asia is interesting.
QUAD of Russia, China, Iran, North Korea Vs QUAD of US, Japan, India, Australia
As an Indian don't count India in quad for god's sake. Most Indians hate the west and its imperialistic policies. Indians love Russia and the border conflict with china was resolved a few days ago around the time of Brics Sumit in Kazan. India will never ever ally with the west
I'm Indian and all I can say is that QUAD or not we're never going to go against Russia lol. The best possible case for the West would be Indian staying slightly pro-Western but still neutral nonetheless. But this is the best case for the West. We on the other hand would choose whatever is the best case for us.
You don't know what you are talking about Australia is under the queen of UK and India is not a partner of USA at the level of UK or even Brazil or Germany
India is shaping up to be a huge thorn in QUAD lol
@@learningisfun5163
More like Brazil. We are definitely not like UK or Germany. Washington dictates Germans and British foreign policy
Meanwhile list of countries in NATO - Albania, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States
They will fight & die for US?
if you compare the populations and the economies you will be disappointed. nato is consumer economies full on debt that will collapse if the producer stops the trade. 8 billion total population and nato may be max 600-700m.
Long story short. Not all the baddies get along.
An important missing point here is that people, either in the West or outside of it, don't need to support one side, don't have to decide between West and the "alternative coalition". While the non-Western emerging powers violate the human rights of their own citizens much more than the West, the Western democracies turned remarkably authoritarian in the past decades, and the situation has never been as nice as it's pictured in the propaganda. Most Western states are racist and hate the poor. And especially today, Western governments crack down on free speech and political rights of citizens shamelessly, and they use totalitarian surveillance towards these aims. Regarding the international affairs, the West does violent crimes, mass murders all the time, out of greediness, with the aim of subjugating and exploiting people. Outside of the West, only Russia does the same, only Russia started an imperialist war. So I think no matter if I live in the West or outside of it, I can't support either side with clean conscience; instead, an ethical decision is to stand against imperialism, violence, murder and chauvinism consistently. For example, for me it's clear that in the Ukrainian war the Ukrainian people, in the Palestinian g*n*c*d* the Palestinian people deserve my sympathy, because they are the ones who are the target of violent imperialist aggression. It's really crazy when I see both Western and non-Western people siding with the big power blocks instead, and supporting Russia against Ukraine simply because the US is the common enemy. I think people should really come up with their own positions on these matters, instead of cheering their favourite governments uncritically.
Can i ask you why is "west" talked about like its just one country when its many countries included in the west and for example when usa have invaded a countries many of these countries was not involved? Your right and peoples opinion wherever they are in the world do not matter at all. You cant even make small decisions for your own daily life , you just have to do what the boss says.
Basef
im not russian and i dont support russia but you label the war in ukraine imperialist based on what? which other countries has russia expressed its intention to invade? the reason of the war has been announced officially and its the aggression of usa building military bases next to the russian borders. only from the fact that usa is indeed doing that then objectively the war is based on defense. when soviet union tried to install missiles in cuba , usa almost started a war and did not allow them to do it. wasnt usa back them defending itself? why in the exact same situation russia is not doing the same?