I bought the object140 instead of T-55AM-1. Here is what i can say about Object140 on my experience. I don't own T-55AM-1 and some of the points are my opinions/experiences so please dont lynch me. Under the pros/cons list i'll put my own opinion of the Object140. Object140 Pros: -good apcbc with 290mm pen and about1000m/s flight speed on all types of ammuniton (apds is higher ofc). Heat is decent. apds is above average in terms of penetration. -stabilizer. (in 8.3BR its worth a mention) -Decent armor that is sligtly better than the one on T-55A due to ufp being in higher angle and slightly beefier armor in turret. Side armor can be trolly due to the "boat" like shape wich makes it slightly better than T-55 side armor. - 17round firststage and can safely carry about 30 rounds. (atleast works for me) Secondary stowages are smaller in profile compared to T-55's -low profile. -14.5mm on the roof. -better turret rotation speed than T-55's. -mobiility or specifically to mention dynamics. Decent Power to weight ratio of 16.1hp/t and top speed of 54km/h. -versitality. -looks cool and is unique vehicle. -fun to play. -BR 8.3 enables you to have good lineups and is overall relatively enjoyable BR. -In maximum down tier extremely nasty beast. In down tiers amror is good and your apcbc is nuking people. -good sight zooms compared to some russian vehicles. Also the sight field of view is pleasant unlike french tanks of the same BR. -commander sight. -rangefinder. (added later because i forgot) And the cons: - 1second Longer reload than T-55's and slower rate of fire compared to other medium tanks of same br. -Mobility here as well. Poor reverse speed that is 8.1km/h (typical russian), bit slow in off road, lack of neutralsteering. (not a major problem) -Side armor is only 20mm at the lower parts and behind of the idler wheel so even small exposure can result in penetretion. Even the upper part is penetrated by auto cannons most of the time. -Hull roof is greatly vulnerable on the front due to it curving downwards to the ufp.( sligthly round parts in ufp's top-left and -right corners) -Turret armor is only at the lower parts. On upper parts of turret armor reduces drastically and cupolas are huge. -About third bigger 1st stage ammo stowage in size compared to T-55's.(exactly same spot and 17rounds) -gun is too low relative to your turret roof. Your turret roof is visible much before you are able to fire in a ridgeline/hulldown situtations. -poor depression and elevation angels compared to other nations.(normal russian stuff) -worse heat than T-55's. (execpt TO-55 its same heat) Also it lacks compared to other nations heat. -Its kinda expensive. -Same price as T-55AM-1 but worse in nearly all aspects. -not neccesarily good in any aspect.(execpt apcbc rounds) -Unique vehicle that is behind pay wall. i still say its bad thing even tough i wouldnt like it to be tech tree because imo its super fun RP/SL grinder. -Doesn't get commander fire control. -commander's optics have poor zoom. -On longer ranges gunner sight zoom feels bit too low. -BR 8.3 in uptiers your armor isn.t enough but bigger problem is mobility and reload rate. So i think that the object140 isn't bad vehicle by anymeans it's more about that it's not particularly good in anything else than its APCBC. Yes its fun vehicle to play and use for grinding SL/RP.(one of my favourites to be honest) But really for the 60e you SHOULD buy T-55AM-1 it's better in basically everything so you can make more consistent SL/RP gains. I still went and paid the 60e for the object140 and i say i don't regret it. Imo its more fun than any of the t-55's but not better. (i have tried all of them multiple times on my friends account) I'd say only selling point of the vehicle is the APCBC round and its uniqueness. Whole point of the object is that you can have devastating fire power with the APCBC (and mainly use it) but it requires a bit more aiming and isn't as viable always as sabot or heat rounds. I'm going to say it's NOT worth the 60e price tag for what you are getting. P.S: Sorry for writing a whole novel and thanks if you bothered to read all that.
@@mingxuanzhang98 I'm pretty sure they mean IF you're buying a prem, ofc tech tree has a better options. But they are right, the T-55AM-1 is pretty damn solid with the huge assortment of ammo and the composite armor at 8.7. And I wouldn't necessarily call the T-55A better anyways, maybe for their respective BRs but overall... No. The T-55AM-1 is literally an _upgraded_ T-55A with better pretty much everything. Better armor, better firepower thanks to missile, has LRF.
@@mingxuanzhang98 I agree with you T-55A is better even tough object140 has better APCBC and hull front is on better angle also the side armor (upper part) is bit better because of the "boat" shape.agree with you.
TH-camrs make this thing look like soviet bias incarnate, but in reality: 1. There are better options in techtree 2. there are better premiums to buy 3. It's just MID in its own BR, just look at the olifant in 8.3. High performing m111 dart, laser rangefinder and -10 gun depression.
" No Pixel Tank, Plane or Ship is worth 60 - 70 Dolleuros ! " . Also me at the next Sale " Oh it costs 50 % less and its War Thunder. The Game you always Play. So lets buy two for the Price of one. The Snail is watching you. Nice Vid M8
I'm honestly sad to see it as a prem cause there is one thing you forgot to mention about the tank and that is the fact the 100mm it has isn't the same as the D-10T variants on all the other Soviet 100mm tanks. It's longer barreled and has excellent velocity even on the APHE and the APDS has pretty damn good pen and velocity too. For a 100mm that APHE slaps.
It's THE APCBC round XD. I mainly shoot the aphe because it has good enough pen for nearly everything, absolutely violates tanks and has really good velocity for aphe. It is kinda sad object is premium because its unique but at the sametime i think its good that its not so i have fun SL printer.
@@nicholasholloway8743 unfortunately... I personally don't think it's worth $60. Maybe if it was cheaper I'd be fine with it as a prem, but it's just overshadowed by the much better T-55AM-1. And like he said in the vid it doesn't help that there's not much of a lineup for it at 8.3. Just kinda sad to see something new and unique compared to the rest of the russian tree be a prem. I just hope they'll add the T-62A as a tech tree tank someday, it's very similar and has the same gun and turret but on a production T-62 chassis.
I baught it because I was a huge World of tanks player, and the OBJ 140 was one of my favorite tank, so for me it was a no brainer to buy that tank. And I'm having a blast playing it, I love it, for me it was worth it.
Russian bias russia is handheld because russian bias by russian shit company and russian trash tanks can only be good in a videogame by a russian shit company🇷🇺🔫🇺🇦✊
I think this should've been added as a tech tree vehicle, rather than a premium.
I agree way to unique to be a premium
I bought the object140 instead of T-55AM-1. Here is what i can say about Object140 on my experience. I don't own T-55AM-1 and some of the points are my opinions/experiences so please dont lynch me. Under the pros/cons list i'll put my own opinion of the Object140.
Object140
Pros:
-good apcbc with 290mm pen and about1000m/s flight speed on all types of ammuniton (apds is higher ofc). Heat is decent. apds is above average in terms of penetration.
-stabilizer. (in 8.3BR its worth a mention)
-Decent armor that is sligtly better than the one on T-55A due to ufp being in higher angle and slightly beefier armor in turret. Side armor can be trolly due to the "boat" like shape wich makes it slightly better than T-55 side armor.
- 17round firststage and can safely carry about 30 rounds. (atleast works for me) Secondary stowages are smaller in profile compared to T-55's
-low profile.
-14.5mm on the roof.
-better turret rotation speed than T-55's.
-mobiility or specifically to mention dynamics. Decent Power to weight ratio of 16.1hp/t and top speed of 54km/h.
-versitality.
-looks cool and is unique vehicle.
-fun to play.
-BR 8.3 enables you to have good lineups and is overall relatively enjoyable BR.
-In maximum down tier extremely nasty beast. In down tiers amror is good and your apcbc is nuking people.
-good sight zooms compared to some russian vehicles. Also the sight field of view is pleasant unlike french tanks of the same BR.
-commander sight.
-rangefinder. (added later because i forgot)
And the cons:
- 1second Longer reload than T-55's and slower rate of fire compared to other medium tanks of same br.
-Mobility here as well. Poor reverse speed that is 8.1km/h (typical russian), bit slow in off road, lack of neutralsteering. (not a major problem)
-Side armor is only 20mm at the lower parts and behind of the idler wheel so even small exposure can result in penetretion. Even the upper part is penetrated by auto cannons most of the time.
-Hull roof is greatly vulnerable on the front due to it curving downwards to the ufp.( sligthly round parts in ufp's top-left and -right corners)
-Turret armor is only at the lower parts. On upper parts of turret armor reduces drastically and cupolas are huge.
-About third bigger 1st stage ammo stowage in size compared to T-55's.(exactly same spot and 17rounds)
-gun is too low relative to your turret roof. Your turret roof is visible much before you are able to fire in a ridgeline/hulldown situtations.
-poor depression and elevation angels compared to other nations.(normal russian stuff)
-worse heat than T-55's. (execpt TO-55 its same heat) Also it lacks compared to other nations heat.
-Its kinda expensive.
-Same price as T-55AM-1 but worse in nearly all aspects.
-not neccesarily good in any aspect.(execpt apcbc rounds)
-Unique vehicle that is behind pay wall. i still say its bad thing even tough i wouldnt like it to be tech tree because imo its super fun RP/SL grinder.
-Doesn't get commander fire control.
-commander's optics have poor zoom.
-On longer ranges gunner sight zoom feels bit too low.
-BR 8.3 in uptiers your armor isn.t enough but bigger problem is mobility and reload rate.
So i think that the object140 isn't bad vehicle by anymeans it's more about that it's not particularly good in anything else than its APCBC. Yes its fun vehicle to play and use for grinding SL/RP.(one of my favourites to be honest) But really for the 60e you SHOULD buy T-55AM-1 it's better in basically everything so you can make more consistent SL/RP gains.
I still went and paid the 60e for the object140 and i say i don't regret it. Imo its more fun than any of the t-55's but not better. (i have tried all of them multiple times on my friends account) I'd say only selling point of the vehicle is the APCBC round and its uniqueness. Whole point of the object is that you can have devastating fire power with the APCBC (and mainly use it) but it requires a bit more aiming and isn't as viable always as sabot or heat rounds.
I'm going to say it's NOT worth the 60e price tag for what you are getting.
P.S:
Sorry for writing a whole novel and thanks if you bothered to read all that.
buy the t-55am-1 instead ngl
Not even T-55am-1, tech tree T-55A already better than it by every way.
@@mingxuanzhang98 I'm pretty sure they mean IF you're buying a prem, ofc tech tree has a better options. But they are right, the T-55AM-1 is pretty damn solid with the huge assortment of ammo and the composite armor at 8.7. And I wouldn't necessarily call the T-55A better anyways, maybe for their respective BRs but overall... No. The T-55AM-1 is literally an _upgraded_ T-55A with better pretty much everything. Better armor, better firepower thanks to missile, has LRF.
@@mingxuanzhang98 I agree with you T-55A is better even tough object140 has better APCBC and hull front is on better angle also the side armor (upper part) is bit better because of the "boat" shape.agree with you.
@@kanava6983 T-55A got better reload, apfsds, better gun handling, and better mobility.
@@RedVRCC If we only talking about the same BR.
TH-camrs make this thing look like soviet bias incarnate, but in reality:
1. There are better options in techtree
2. there are better premiums to buy
3. It's just MID in its own BR, just look at the olifant in 8.3. High performing m111 dart, laser rangefinder and -10 gun depression.
It indeed is mid af. But i think its fun to play because of the ap rounds.
Those 60 bucks are just to much, I wouldn't be surprised when the start selling top tier vehicles for 100 bucks
I think aussie and Canada it’s already $100
Swedish viggen is already 80 bucks sadly.
I love the new lag that gianjin added to the game. Makes the game so much better
Lol especially on console, random fps drops everywhere
I though its only my pc problem.
No at all. Just get the t55am1 during a sale
" No Pixel Tank, Plane or Ship is worth 60 - 70 Dolleuros ! " . Also me at the next Sale " Oh it costs 50 % less and its War Thunder. The Game you always Play. So lets buy two for the Price of one.
The Snail is watching you.
Nice Vid M8
Should have been a tech tree vehicle. Between T54s and T55A
8.5 sec reload at aced crew is crazy. Even the T-54 is 7.5
It's like a Object 435 but bigger, 0.3 of a BR lower, and has APHE....
this would pair well with my PT-76-57.
Like how many T55 variants are there already? Let's make another with little differences in potential and slap a new game price on it.
It is so good. Got a nuke running it and a t10m on the first match I played today.
I'm honestly sad to see it as a prem cause there is one thing you forgot to mention about the tank and that is the fact the 100mm it has isn't the same as the D-10T variants on all the other Soviet 100mm tanks. It's longer barreled and has excellent velocity even on the APHE and the APDS has pretty damn good pen and velocity too. For a 100mm that APHE slaps.
That's why they think it's worth 60$
It's THE APCBC round XD. I mainly shoot the aphe because it has good enough pen for nearly everything, absolutely violates tanks and has really good velocity for aphe.
It is kinda sad object is premium because its unique but at the sametime i think its good that its not so i have fun SL printer.
@@nicholasholloway8743 unfortunately... I personally don't think it's worth $60. Maybe if it was cheaper I'd be fine with it as a prem, but it's just overshadowed by the much better T-55AM-1. And like he said in the vid it doesn't help that there's not much of a lineup for it at 8.3. Just kinda sad to see something new and unique compared to the rest of the russian tree be a prem. I just hope they'll add the T-62A as a tech tree tank someday, it's very similar and has the same gun and turret but on a production T-62 chassis.
AM-1 with composite armor and LRF with APCBC, LRF, HEAT, and ATGM is way more worth the money than this. (opinion of a AM-1 user )
I baught it because I was a huge World of tanks player, and the OBJ 140 was one of my favorite tank, so for me it was a no brainer to buy that tank. And I'm having a blast playing it, I love it, for me it was worth it.
Yeah i bought it instantly. super fun to play even tough there is better tanks.
My official decision: Not buying it.
Holy sh- a youtuber that doesn't overhyper a straighup metal armor on russian tanks and doesn't call it "impossible to pen"
Russian bias russia is handheld because russian bias by russian shit company and russian trash tanks can only be good in a videogame by a russian shit company🇷🇺🔫🇺🇦✊
Tech tree T-55A already better than it by every way. Also T-55A meh is crazy.
Why in wt al t 54/55 and 62 have 100 mm insted of 200 mm
First