I believe I ordered it from import image part number D1010FE020. I don’t recall noticing much of a height difference. The part went in just like the original.
@ that’s the wrong mount. It should be D1010FE000-which has part number ST410224S040 on the rubber. The one u got is too tall and changes the angle of the drive shaft slightly, at worse. At best nothing is wrong.
@@RobHTech they sell the part I bought as the jdm version. Saying it is a bit stiffer than the version you referenced. It seems there is some conflicting information on the sellers websites.
@ yeah that’s why i triple checked. IIR has the wrong part number on the part itself. They also put some poor images, i guess yo hide that it’s not the actual JDM part. SMY sells the actual JDM one with the original part number on it
Thanks for this, getting ready to do the same install on my VB. Might be helpful to post those torque specs in your description for easy reference.
Three group N is taller. Does that matter? What’s the number and where did you order from?
I believe I ordered it from import image part number D1010FE020. I don’t recall noticing much of a height difference. The part went in just like the original.
@ that’s the wrong mount. It should be D1010FE000-which has part number ST410224S040 on the rubber. The one u got is too tall and changes the angle of the drive shaft slightly, at worse. At best nothing is wrong.
@@RobHTech they sell the part I bought as the jdm version. Saying it is a bit stiffer than the version you referenced. It seems there is some conflicting information on the sellers websites.
@ yeah that’s why i triple checked. IIR has the wrong part number on the part itself. They also put some poor images, i guess yo hide that it’s not the actual JDM part. SMY sells the actual JDM one with the original part number on it
@indecisivegarage2389 he's correct, group n is taller than the jdm sti group n transmission mount. ST410224S040 - that's the correct sku.