ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
My favourite chess opening against 1.d4: Budapest Gambit
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ค. 2022
- Big shoutout to @Chess Tube for the help with the analysis!
WATCH ME LIVE ► / alessiasanteramo
UPGRADE to Chess.com Premium (and support Alessia at the same time) ► www.chess.com/...
Follow me on Twitter ► / alessiasantera1
Follow me on Instagram ► / alessia_santeramo
#AlessiaSanteramo #Twitch #chess #chessopenings
*From being the funniest Chess Master to being the best teacher Chess Master now.*
I hope I'm still finny hihi
@@Alessia_Santeramo of course you still are! Come on! Keep it up!
I love the budapest gambit, and this a great explanation!
Glad it was helpful!
You explain this gambit very well Alessia. It added to my existing knowledge of it. Thank you and more power !
First time seeing your video. Excellent job. Very clear. Extremely organized. It is one of the best instructional videos on the Budapest gambit. Thank you.
You're growing fast and I'm all for it!
Really love the thumbnail! Well done Alessia.
Thank you :)
I play the Budapest gambit too.. most d4 players on Lower levels don't know the theory
The guide is good but the animations are what I'll remember most lol.
Very good indeed. It is a LOT of information but I will give it a try
Tremendous video! Now I want to visit Budapest, on the board and the streets
lol yep then send us some picture on Discord ;)
I like very much your explanations and your style
That video alone should have won you Chess Streamer of the Year.
Some of this went a bit too fast but this seems like a really cool opening. ❤ Would it work against lower rated players?
I think this would take about a week to internalize.
❤❤❤❤❤ thanks a lot for those vídeos!!
challenger to the throne of agadmator is here.
Woooo I take it :)
Alessia!!! Keep up the POG content. YEPJAM
Thank you ma'am ✨❤️
Alessia, do you smoke? I know it is not permitted during play now but it might appeal between rounds .. maybe during preparation.
Love the Budapest, and a fun video! I miss having the use of emotes here though to fully express myself :( alessiaHype
Very energenic,clear ,fast
My opponent plays Nf3 on move 2....
Very nice video. Great info here.
Glad you enjoyed it!
The video was really nice 🔥❤️
What if White plays 6. Be2 instead of 6. Nc3? Should Black take the pawn on e5 or first castle?
Always be Reti/raidy!
I LOVE YOU ALESSIA ☺😊 MUAHHH😘😚😙❤💓💖
😊❤
Superb
Thank you! Cheers!
Listen to this beautiful WFM she is the best chess streamer in my humble opinion ❤❤❤
Hey Alessia, this video has more than 250 likes, so where is the promised budapest gambit match ? 🙂
My favourite streamer YEPJAM
Awww
i was going to write a long comment on chess theory like alekhine, then i seen the name Budapest and remembered better times in romania trips where i never even knew what a chess piece was and decided instead to just write a note to say can i take some time off for holidays.
why do you always look here lol
Why do you always write there
I can also do this
In response to your latest reply to me i just want to say:
you are in my top 3 streamers whose name's begin with A
Thank you
YOu are also in the top 3 chatter whose name starts with H
@@Alessia_Santeramo I meant top 4 streamers whose name begins with A scuze
The problems:
1. The Budapest is not a gambit in the majority of lines
2. The Budapest is refuted, if the opponent knows some theory a draw is the most desirable outcome for black.
3. The Budapest is not commonly played at master level, therefore there are not many games for reference.
solution:
Play 3. ... Ne4, not 3. ... Ng4
1. It is an actual gambit, therefore it is not a scam
2. It is so rarely played that no one will know the theory
3. There are some master games, they all follow the same pattern but are rarely analyzed by people who don't play it because the games are just too old
4. Also there are cool traps, everyone knows the smothered mate in the standard budapest
Example for a cool line, this just leads to a sharp position, engine says white is very slightly better:
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e5 3. dxe5 Ne4 4. Nf3 b6 5. Qd5 Bb7 6. Qxb7 Nc6 7. Nd4 Bb4+ 8.
Nc3 O-O 9. Bd2 Nxf2 10. Kxf2 Qh4+
White will have to play extremely precise to not lose here.
Anyways, barely acceptable video, like! 👍
It's true that you won't see Magnus Carlsen playing the Budapest Gambit against super GMs because you're right, Black has better options than 2...e5 against 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4. But I know quite a few 2000 - 2200 rated players who get a lot of easy wins against players rated below 2000. That said I don't plan on using it in any serious games myself. However calling this a "barely acceptable video" seems way too harsh. I actually like this video and might use this gambit in a blitz or bullet game some time.
I feel like you missed the point of my comment. The budapest is a disgrace to all gambits, it is giving the ilusion of playing some risky opening when infact the majority of times, 4.Nf3 or 4.Bf4 will be played and this will result in the same positions over and over again.
The mainlines are also not very dynamic, if white wants to, they can shut down most counterplay rather easily, as a former Budapest player I can tell you, that playing it a few times in Blitz can be fun, but if you want a dynamic opening you are at the wrong place.
My suggestion of 3. ... Ne4 is not meant to be better but rather it is supposed to be more dynamic while also fulfilling the requirement of giving away material that real gambits have.
Statistically speaking, both openings are equally bad with a win rate of about 50% for white.
There are a plethora of traps in the Fajarowicz, while the "normal" Budapest has the rather famous smothered mate trap. It is understandable to me why Miss Santeramo likes to play it but the major downside is, simply put, you have to be stronger than your opponent with basically no chance for a win against equally strong opponents or even stronger opponents while the Fajarowicz is not only complicated but also very dynamic, white has to be relatively precise and watch out for tactical blows by black while the "normal" Budapest aims more towards a brute force way to break through whites defense.
My criticism towards the video is purely towards its content, the video itself is well-edited and because of respect towards the editor, I think the video is acceptable. Though my deep hatred of the Budapest prevails.
@@alekhinedefense8416I have no argument with you when you point out that objectively the Budapest is not good or that White has safe ways to decline it. When I relate that a number of 2000 - 2200 rated players I know win many easy victories against players rated below 2000 with the Budapest I am simply pointing out a pertinent fact.
@@Steveross2851 The point being what? People with higher ratings tend to beat people lower rated because they are stronger, the opening does not really matter. My problem is that this video gives a false image of the Budapest as a dynamic opening when, the majority of times, it isn't. It can become dynamic if black is a dynamic player but that goes for any opening. I don't understand why people want to play a fake gambit that leads to an equal position most of the time. There is nothing exciting about that and that, again, is completely fine with me. But this video sadly addresses the unbalanced lines unproportionally much compared to how often they arise. And even then I find that white has a seemingly more pleasant position just because they need to know one of many plans for white and they will be fine.
Glad you appreciated the editing work! Thanks for the visit
couldnt find the longest comment
uh oh
Ciao
Ciao, parli italiano?
@@Alessia_Santeramo Sapevo solo che eri italiano .. quindi ho provato a dire in italiano
@@Alessia_Santeramo A proposito, ho giocato con Alekhine, è davvero un buon giocatore.. Ho perso tutte le partite... Ma quelle sono state delle belle partite.
You are amazing and beautiful
It would be nice to have a repertoire in the case that white does not play 2.c4.
First Comment
Last reply
@@Alessia_Santeramo 😂🤪