Yeap. With the Defence orientation going back to what used to be, Swedish young are now first hand experiencing the stories they had heard from their parents and great parents :-)
Hold the trafic ! A Swedish Jas 39 is about to land on this road. Sweden should be the first country to have a road sign to say. Beware of incoming jets !!
Sweden may be the most associated country with road operations, because of jets made specifically to do it, but in the Cold War they were hardly the only ones. Several European countries did it, in both sides of the curtain. There is a video in YT of MiG-21s from some Warsaw Pact AF doing it on a grass field. In NATO times Germany trained together with their allies: th-cam.com/video/Qx7Meo7w-pY/w-d-xo.html
@@magoid Yes but only Sweden and Finland had ALL their operations from road bases during war or in case of hightened alert. Not only the air forces of Sweden and Finland did this but also all other of their military units were dispersed in case of war or hightened alert. Every unit was supposed to operate as guerilla units. Strike where it hurt the enemy the most and then quickly disperse and hide from enemies sight. The tactic wasn't meant to win the war but rather hurt the enemy as much as possible and above all, last as long as possible and let the enemy know that they could not take the whole country by a few strikes. It was meant to cost the enemy as much as possible.
Beautiful. Just beautiful!! (I've seen this up close and personal but with the predecessor Viggen. It's an experience to behold and remember, for sure. The closer the better. :) )
Long take-off, short landing with no weapons. They always cut the take-off roll so you can't actually see how long it takes. This was exposed in Finland when the Finns just let the cameras roll without cuts or edits.
@@hemligx-sson8202Once I witnessed a very short landing. About 20 m. Aero interested people call it a hard landing I am told. The plane was not operative afterwards. Needed large maintenance. The Airport is called Långholmen.
@@LRRPFco52 There is plenty of footage from airshows that proofs it. There is videos from the UK where F-18, F-16 & Gripen goes in and lands and take off after each other and the Gripen clearly was the shortest in each one.
@@zoom5024 Finland tested all this. You can watch F/A-18Cs in mil power taking off in shorter distance than 3 Gripen C/Ds, who were lightly loaded with EFTs and missiles. Any of the US teen fighters will leap off the runway way before a Gripen. The only way to get the Gripen down in take-off roll is to empty as much fuel as possible from it, strip it of any stores, and do it on a really cold day. Otherwise, its take-off performance is embarrassingly-anemic. (Me: Been around this business since the 1970s, decades of which were spent at the USAF Flight Test Center, so I’ve seen countless fighters take off and land over the past 50 years.)
Very nice footage and sound! The Gripen is perfect for road bases, with it's smaller size. Would be cool to experience seeing a road base landing/takeoff for real.
@@MegaGronis It's so cool! I did my time as a mechanic at F5 in Ljungbyhed, but we didn't go to any road bases. I guess I was a bit lazy, not choosing F10 wing with the mighty Viggens! But still, I got to fly with a Team 60 member (P-O) on my "muckarflygning" =)
I will see you soon at our air port at philippines we salute you jass 39 a cheaper low cost price and hypersonic advance fighter jets of the world!!!mabuhay
This is the fighter Canada needs. The F35 could never do this even with out a full weapons or fuel load. With the money we save buying the Gripen we could pave some of our remote gravel runways which would also help with SAR efforts in the north.
Whenever the pilot is hungry, he just lands on the road and orders hamburgers in the "drive through", eats in the parking space and then takes off to get back into the fight... :D
That's what they truly did at the begining after WW I,landing in meadows near farmers to have a snack.Problem,one day the Colonel could not re-start the engine, so he came back to the base by train,his parachute on the shoulder . After that it was strictly forbidden to do this!!!
There is a sandwich box in the cockpit, the jas fuel consumption is about 1/3 of many fighter jets. Viggen was better at low speed and short takeoffs, but had more drag in the air.
Heared that sound over my hometown, dident see any flight plane, but the sound at the beginning of the video is so similar. Might have been a JAS 39 Gripen. 🤩
Boa parceria Brasil-Suécia. Um grande salto para a FAB. Nossos antigos F5 modernizados equivalem aos F16 imagina o Gripen E nas mãos dos pilotos Brasileiros é como Neymar jogando futebol.
And hopefully your Brasilian pilots, who trains here in Sweden.....have picked up the Coolness of the Northmen! That would be a leathal combination! 😊😎😉😃🌞 💙💛💚💙💛💚💙💛💚💙💛💚
Probably they let the traffic through between landing and take off otherwise they would have redirected the traffic further down the road. I'd say waiting time maximum 20 minutes.
I wish there was a way to get a few dozen of these to the Ukrainians. This would be the perfect combat aircraft for the situation they are dealing with right now. It is high tech enough to compete with aircraft such as the Su-30 and Su-35. But is also cheap, doesn't require as much maintenance as other fighters and can operate from small air strips or even highways.
Try to do this with a F-35 or any other fancy fighter jet. They would probably need a couple of hours of service before they can be airborn again. Keep it simple is the right way to go.
@Donald Twitter We sweep our road bases as well, but they don't have to be 2.5 kilometres. :-) Also, Gripen will have a turn-around of 10 minutes between air-to-air missions (fueling/re-arming) and around 20 minutes for air-to-ground missions. Which is likely giving the SwAF better strike capability/oomph per hour than most others.
@@TheNybergCorporation And that was the general idea with "JAS" (H)unt (A)ttack and (S)urveillance . It wasn't build to be able to carrying hundreds of tons of bombs or fuel. When depleted they just land on any close "road base" and rearm and refuel and they are back to action. This is not a first strike weapon, more like fully defensive weapon. Out first strike weapon is called "Surströmming"
hey @AeroPresentation I always wanted to visit a Swedish Road base I live in Sweden and all but where do I find one? near stockholm if u know any near that
They choose among the two F-16 and this Gripen, budget can accomodate for 14 gripen which means the original 12 have an addtional of 2 more Gripen bringing a total of 14 gripen but F-16 also countered the offer with 12 F-16 plus an additional of 2 used/ second hand F-16 of the same amount of money but Philippine govt. decided to take the Gripen offer of 12 + 2 bringing a total of 14 brand new jets from Gripen.
Well that is not a problem since it uses the canard wings as an air brake, look at the video, as soon as the nose wheel touchdown, the wing tilts forward. STOL design.
Big fan of the Grippen and hope Canada goes with it. Like the road demo but these guys aren't going to landing on sunny cloudless days using VFR. How are you going to deal with night operations, limited visibility and snow and ice covered roads? Is there an IFR system for austere landing strips? This is a big deal for Canada.
The answer to night landings is the NILS system. These systems =NILS (and NINS) has been upgraded over the years and are now a part of Finnish fighter competition from SAAB. www.aviationtoday.com/2002/10/01/the-gripens-nato-ized-nins/ Gripen E landing in winter climate at Vidsel airbase close to the arctic circle (=Swedish area 51:-). www.saab.com/newsroom/stories/2020/april/cold-climate-test---harsh-weather-no-match-for-gripen-e
@@jorgenpersson662 Thanks for the info Jorgen. Canada is going to have to depend on austere landing strips to defend the north. Canada has a lot of territory way north of the Artic Circle. I don't doubt that the SAF has done the drills in the winter conditions but I'm talking Artic. Being able to land the Grippen on a road or ice landing strip in the Artic winter is a big plus as long as the plane doesn't freeze on the ground. The small foot print of the ground crew means that we could have these landing strips all over the place. The USAF is testing this concept with F22s and F15s as I write this but they are still tied to a small number of airports.
@@marvidjack Gripen system is especially made to functon in winter climate on dispersed small road landing strips. And you can just make landing strips on ice if you want... As you see in this video you only need tools from a single 20 ft container to be able to do most maintenence, even change the engine. th-cam.com/video/QyD0liioY8E/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=Saab Gripen fighters have a integrated navigations system that is as good as military GPS called NINS. You also have an integrated landing system called NILS. These two systems makes it possible for Gripen land on austere landingstrips even in bad weather, low visibility. www.aviationtoday.com/2002/10/01/the-gripens-nato-ized-nins/
A carrier has much broader landing strips and a wire to catch the plane. Most US carrier pilots would just refuse to set down on a public road (among trees!) like this, unless it was an emergency or they sat in a F-35.
Jag kan tänka mig att det inte direkt är lätt att få bra ljudinspelningar av reaplan, när motorn hamnar framför kameran så blåser den ju en enorm mängd luft mot mikrofonen vilket får ljudet att låta sämre.
Gripen ist ein völlig unterschätztes Flugzeug. C/D sind schon gut und E/F sind für jedes andere Flugzeug harte Gegner. Der Hauptvorteil von Gripen ist die leichte Wartung/Aufrüstung die fast überall durchgeführt werden kann. Ein Gripen ist bei Bedarf viel mehr in der Luft als andere Kampfflugzeuge die auf ihre Basen angewiesen sind. Und es ist ein kleines Flugzeug mit einem kleinen Radarquerschnitt. Spektakulär sind die Landungen auf Landstraßen definitiv, noch spannender ist es wenn Gripen dazu noch mit eigener Kraft rückwärts im Wald einparkt um wieder betankt und aufmunioniert zu werden. Dieses Flugzeug könnte in der Ukraine viel bewirken und ich bin mir ziemlich sicher das russischen Piloten der "Arsch auf Grundeis" geht wenn sie wissen das praktisch überall in der Ukraine Gripen auf sie lauern könnten.
Gripen JAS 39C/ D MS20 IS tje best for Phil. PAF.as.of now.this can be upgraded to MS21 W/ AESA.radar (PS-05/A Mark 5).we hope to receive this by 2023-2024.& by 2027 JAS 39 E/F -12 UNITS.
This is one of the operational advantages that characterize the Jas 39 and historically , because of the Cold War circumstance and the possibility of Sweden facing a total Bolshevik military invasion or the possibility of Sweden turning into a part of the nuclear war exchange in western europe theater of operations, the Swedish combat aircraft came with this specification as standard operational requirement . However, the DPRK AF conducted similar exercises on landing and taking off the heavier platforms mig 21- mig 29 as part of their AF operational tendency to utilize the public roads as temporary mobile air bases during the total war with DY united states in case the needs for emergency landing Or that the DY americans war machine succeed in destroying , overwhelming or disrupting the work of their air bases , in addition to the fact that the Chinese and Bolshevik combat aircrafts come standard with the capabilities of using and being operated from unpaved runways at least to give their front line combat aircrafts the capabilities to keep pace with the rapid advancement or the maneuver of the armored and motorized formations on the ground . However, this is an advantage that the other Western combat aircrafts do not possess, coupled with Jas39 simplicity to be service and maintained and its requirement for small service team of 5 persons lead by a single technician to service and prepare the Jas 39 during the intensive combat environment , So the Jas-39 remains superior to its Western counterparts in terms of its operational flexibility . But the Jas39 comes with very an unrealistic price for its : 1-category as light combat aircraft ( LCA ) sharing this class with CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder and Indian Tejas . 2- characteristics and technical specifications , 3-the structure flexibility for future expansion and growth without major redesigning , or how scalable the platform to host new hardware . 4- what it can offer on the modern battlefield , In the Light combat aircrafts (LCA) category there are Indian Tejas at about a third of the Jas39 price ( the 75 million DY american dollar price per tejas mk1A / mk2 Covering the costs of the long research and development stages of the platform in its two generations mk1 / mk2 , In addition to covering the production costs which include for example: the materials from which the structure is made especially especially the composite materials which make more than 75% of the materials used to construct the structure , components and devices , working hours for technician teams and workers..... etc. without ignoring the possibilities of lacking transparency between the parties involved in the project , but the indian army sites have another views droping the price to around 60 million DY americans dollar per unite and considering it very reasonable price in comparison with the very high prices the DY americans and swedish aviation manufacturers are offering India for the F21 / Jas39 platforms , and defending the awarded contract to HAL by saying that : the Indian Tejas still cheaper by 50% than the DY american F21 and about 30% than the swedish Jas39 and the full amount will be spend it inside India , Otherwise the Tejas mk1 still presented for domestic and export at 26 million DY american dollar per unit , although most of its components were locally develop while the upgrading program to the mk2 standard were conducted utilizing foreign technologies which are generally speaking off the shelf components and offered at much cheaper prices than financial resources dedicated for developing new technology from scratch ) . In the same time the design of Indian Tejas makes it a platform that can be scalable over the time , so that the technological and technical advantages and qualities that currently enjoys by the Jas39 will fade away over the time , for example the Wide Area Display (WAD) used by swedish platform Jas39 is the same as that used on Indian Tejas mk2 and perhaps from the same supplier . However, the Jas39 outperforms its Indian counterparts with the stability and expertise of industrial infrastructure, especially the aerospace industries and its complementary subsidiary industries, so SAAB can meet the commitments of construction and delivery rates steadily and spending time and resources on expanding the capabilities and roles of its platform by further developing the structure the hardware , software and other components of the aircrafts , On the hand the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) still struggling to organize the work of production lines and the indian Tejas comes with continuous delays . In my opinion after excluding the geopolitical considerations, the Chinese J10 family and bolsheviks mig35 a much better platforms in all aspects that play a major roles in enhancing the survivability and improving combat characteristics of the combat aircrafts , Beside both platforms situated in higher category as the medium weight multi role combat aircrafts which hinder any possible sale of those Chinese and Bolsheviks combat aircrafts to some parts of the world especially to the western hemisphere ( With the exception of Finland, which acquired during the Cold War MiG-21 and Mi-8 helicopters beside other weapon systems including air defence systems , radar systems ...etc , and the Nokia Corporation for Communications and Micro-Technology was one of the windows of the Bolshevik military-industrial complex and with it the Bolshevik war machine on the Western technology, it is strange that Sukhoi did not try to offer Su-35 on the Finish competition to replace the F/A-18 fighters ) . And in the same time with the larger and heavier platform comes standard extra capabilities like enhanced : flying characteristic , combat capabilities and potentials growth and expanding . and both platforms offered for between 30 - 35 milion DY american dollar when the swedish platform Jas39 are presented for 80 million DY americans dollar , which is a price close to the bolsheviks Su-35 aircraft which is real air superiority platform with great deep strike capabilities , make it a very flexible multi-roles platform comes and due to its large size comes with great potentials for future expansion and growth . While the limited technological advantages the Jas 39 possesses at this time for example : active & passive awareness systems , unified electronic warfare suits, and sensor fusion ....etc will be diminish over time when the Chinese and bolsheviks will develop their technologies or in near future when they will finish deploying their 5th gen combat aircrafts saturation their frontline squadrons with the stealthy combat aircrafts they will turn their attention to integrate those new technologies developed for the 5th gen platforms onboard existing ( 4 plus and 4 plus plus ) platforms as the 5th gen combat aircrafts were mostly stealthy platforms described as high-end niche quality platforms . This is why I do not think that it will be the workhorse of the air forces in both countries in times of peace , and it will be used economically , with a focus in traditional employment roles on conducting high-value tasks and duties , in addition to its use in combat simulation exercises , training , developing the employment principles and doctrine of the stealth aircrafts , same things for the operational preferences which is to large extent already a standard requirements in those Chinese and Bolsheviks platforms ... However for the time being and in comparison with the DY americans offered platforms I strongly believe the Jas 39 still suiting the defensive needs of the countries surrounding russia in addition to the countries of east and central europe especially when all those countries share with sweden the same strategic defense needs and requirements . Worth noting here that the south korean future fighter aircraft KAI KF-21 Boramae/Fighting Hawk (formerly known as KF-X) with its twin engines , very modern & stealthy design , very reasonable price , superior flying characteristics and advanced combat capabilities , will give the Jas 39 and the DY americans F16/21 and F/A 18 super hornet with its conventional designing very difficult time especially when it's being offered with transferring technologies and local manufacturing ,and the south korean platform with its open architect will be very scalable to accept third party hardwares , softwares and weapon systems . .... Always And Forever May GOD Bless The Un United States Of HM Shninasios .....
@@user-kw4jw4jd2o Regarding the subject of discussion the Jas39 , I wish if you waste your time on putting objective comment instead of this empty political statement , I am not an expert, and I do not claim this but for me my comment makes sense... If you have points you should put it in your comment instead of this empty generalizing . I call them BOLSHEVIKS because I WANT TO , and no one ask for your opinion , And if I live in a parallel world, it would be better to call China bolsheviks but I did not although it is govern by a communist party. But your President Putin calls the members of the military and intelligence establishments and the rest of the state apparatus comrades, a term taken from the miserable Soviet Union era, and do not forget the reinstall the red star as the emblem of the military establashment . And all the members of the first ranks of the Bolshevik leadership are children of the Bolshevik regime And if we exclude several aspects in the modern russia for examole including : 1- the pattern of economic activity. 2-the mechanism of directed and controlled elections, 3- the regulated freedom of opinion, 4 religious freedom, which is important for strategic reasons, then the current regime is a Bolshevik regime, but in a modern way . In the end, it is not a bad idea to support nostalgic feeling for the past if it is serving a purpose without losing sense with the needs and requirements of the present time , because it will give modern bolsheviks state a wider dimension at least to whom were considered as ideological allies and sphere of influence where I think the miserable communist ideology still have many supporters between many countries allows the intelligence services of the Bolsheviks to re-weave the bonds of their relations with the Bolshevik parties and movements around the world, especially \many strategic parts of the world whom which is important for the national security of the modern bolsheviks state like : eastern europe,or the warsaw pact countries and Central & south america ... ... Always And Forever May GOD Bless The Un United States Of HM Shnina ...
@@eagleeye6691 As for Gripen, he has extremely little chance of surviving in a battle with any modern Russian fighter ... In addition, Gripen is a very emergency one - on TH-cam you can easily find 5-10 crashes of this "masterpiece" .... with the death of the pilots. Poland and other countries of the former Warsaw Pact continue to support the ancient Su-22 and MiG-29, despite the lack of original parts for repair, due to their undeniable combat effectiveness. While the much newer F-16s are in endless repairs ... Russia, back in the early 90s, abandoned single-engine combat aircraft ... since the loss of a single engine is guaranteed to lead to the loss of an aircraft. Now, however, the development of two alternative single-engine fighters is already underway. mainly for export, but also for Russia with the possibility of a manned and unmanned version, with artificial intelligence. Although, in the USSR there were great single-engine fighters MiG-21 and MiG-23. $ 60 million is extremely expensive for Gripen !!! For the Russian Aerospace Forces, even significantly large, twin-engine aircraft (Su-30SM, Su-34, Su-35, Su-57 - the fifth generation !!!) are cheaper! The price of western aircraft is dominated by the corruption component ... Therefore, with the military budget 13 times !!! less than that of the United States, "poor" Russia is capable of destroying all NATO countries in a day .... But Putin is a GREAT HUMANIST! So live ... for now)))
@@user-kw4jw4jd2o Bullshit. There has only been one Gripen crash which caused the death of the pilot, and that was in Thailand. No pilots have died in the 30 years that Sweden has used the Gripen. Compared to older jets there have been extremely few crashes and deaths.
Kanatlarda silah yüklü değil,tam silah yükü ile böyle sert bir inişi başaramayacagı kanaatindeyim,ama yine de kısa yarıcaplı görevler için iyi bir uçak.Tek handikapı,motor dahil çogu bileşenleri İsveç in değil,ihracaatta sorun çıkma ihtimali var,g.korenin T50 si gibi.Her ülkeye serbestçe satamazsınız.
Detta bästa alternativ för Finland. Men amerikaner "tvingar" köpa sämre fighter.. Med leksaks vapen, som det gick år 1994,.. Först på 2000 talet bättre vapen under vingar, när kongressen i USA gick med
Using roadbases fits Finnish way of fighting as well. It’s like guerilla warfare with planes… The planes that requires a lot of support from bases will have problems in a fight with Russia since those bases will be gone day one of fighting…
@@jussihaila But Finland already have JASSM?? And how is the Finnish requirements on wartime support handled in that concept? Finland required more or less domestic support?
@@iananderson7883 On the contrary, she's far from nothing - which every blunt and diminishing comment of her kinda proves. However, in this context I totally agree with @AeroPresentation - here she's irrelevant. It's a great video of something even greater. And I actually think she approves by the way. Her freedom is based on certain things, and what we're watching here is one of them.
@@iananderson7883 we'll, that's the thing. You're the one making "jokes". On behalf of others. That's on you, not me. We can discuss the impact of Greta bit surely there's a better place for that. Let's appreciate the beauty of the Gripen here instead, shall we?
![Bas 90 - Air Base System 90, Swedish Air Force (1986) [english subtitles available]](/img/n.gif)
*My Grandfather and his parents immigrated from Sweden to the USA in 1903, he was a child.*
*I Welcome Sweden and the Gripen to NATO.*
thank you.
Respect 👍🏻 to the Swedish Air Force 🃏🤙🏻 !!!!
Look how it turns on a tight road. Wow! Even a regular car needs more space to make that turn 😂😂
Fantastiske JAS Gripen 👍🇸🇪
Translation: the amazing jas gripen
Great video. A JAS 39 Gripen on a road, it's so exotic for a French man! Thanks for sharing.
Thank you very much!
Many countries should take note of the gripens to learn how to make a great deadly and simple aircraft
Gripen stealth. Intruder can be flying right over it not knowing it’s there, parked in the woods anywhere near a regular road, ready to intercept.
Looks so nimble 🤩
Back to the good old days ;)
Yeap. With the Defence orientation going back to what used to be, Swedish young are now first hand experiencing the stories they had heard from their parents and great parents :-)
Hold the trafic ! A Swedish Jas 39 is about to land on this road. Sweden should be the first country to have a road sign to say. Beware of incoming jets !!
😄
Är det vid Ljungbyhed ?
Sweden may be the most associated country with road operations, because of jets made specifically to do it, but in the Cold War they were hardly the only ones. Several European countries did it, in both sides of the curtain. There is a video in YT of MiG-21s from some Warsaw Pact AF doing it on a grass field.
In NATO times Germany trained together with their allies: th-cam.com/video/Qx7Meo7w-pY/w-d-xo.html
NATO still does:
th-cam.com/video/FgYD8JPf5yA/w-d-xo.html
A-10s in Estonia
@@magoid Yes but only Sweden and Finland had ALL their operations from road bases during war or in case of hightened alert.
Not only the air forces of Sweden and Finland did this but also all other of their military units were dispersed in case of war or hightened alert.
Every unit was supposed to operate as guerilla units.
Strike where it hurt the enemy the most and then quickly disperse and hide from enemies sight.
The tactic wasn't meant to win the war but rather hurt the enemy as much as possible and above all, last as long as possible and let the enemy know that they could not take the whole country by a few strikes.
It was meant to cost the enemy as much as possible.
trevligt att se att väg baserna tränas på !
Beautiful. Just beautiful!! (I've seen this up close and personal but with the predecessor Viggen. It's an experience to behold and remember, for sure. The closer the better. :) )
Saknar Viggen. Den kunde backa!
Watching the top gun movie I figured it was hard taking off from a short runway. I guess that wasnt a swedish plane...
Perfect for our Swedish roads with its short take off and landning distance🙌👌
Long take-off, short landing with no weapons. They always cut the take-off roll so you can't actually see how long it takes. This was exposed in Finland when the Finns just let the cameras roll without cuts or edits.
Take off 500 meters and landning 600 meters.
@@hemligx-sson8202Once I witnessed a very short landing. About 20 m. Aero interested people call it a hard landing I am told. The plane was not operative afterwards. Needed large maintenance. The Airport is called Långholmen.
@@LRRPFco52 There is plenty of footage from airshows that proofs it. There is videos from the UK where F-18, F-16 & Gripen goes in and lands and take off after each other and the Gripen clearly was the shortest in each one.
@@zoom5024 Finland tested all this. You can watch F/A-18Cs in mil power taking off in shorter distance than 3 Gripen C/Ds, who were lightly loaded with EFTs and missiles. Any of the US teen fighters will leap off the runway way before a Gripen. The only way to get the Gripen down in take-off roll is to empty as much fuel as possible from it, strip it of any stores, and do it on a really cold day. Otherwise, its take-off performance is embarrassingly-anemic. (Me: Been around this business since the 1970s, decades of which were spent at the USAF Flight Test Center, so I’ve seen countless fighters take off and land over the past 50 years.)
Awesome jet, beautiful footage!
Thanks for sharing.
Thank you!
Häftigt! JAS 39 Gripen är ett fantastiskt vackert och smäckert flygplan.
I wish Norway had gone for these instead of the F-35s.
Very nice footage and sound! The Gripen is perfect for road bases, with it's smaller size. Would be cool to experience seeing a road base landing/takeoff for real.
Thank you!
What do you thinking?
We had many road bases in Sweden . Many!, Draken . Lansen .Viggen . I have seen them. Parking places for aircraft . We had a mighty air force !
you don't know nothing about the Swedish air force in the 60 70 and 80s . I know .
@@MegaGronis It's so cool! I did my time as a mechanic at F5 in Ljungbyhed, but we didn't go to any road bases. I guess I was a bit lazy, not choosing F10 wing with the mighty Viggens! But still, I got to fly with a Team 60 member (P-O) on my "muckarflygning" =)
With those hard landings it feels almost like it could land on a carrier
There are many air brakes on it. It could probably come to a full stop if it touched down at the very tip of the carrier strip.
There is a carrier version called Gripen Maritime if someone orders them.
I love this fighter very good capabilities overall... affordable for Phil.military!!!
Everyone's gangsta until they're tailgated by the fighter jet.
Som i gamla dagar: Hastighetsbegränsning upphör - fri fart!!!
Just what Canada needs to land on short airfields in our north (when we pave some)
I'd like to see one landing on a permafrost road
Canada vs russia final hockey
I will see you soon at our air port at philippines we salute you jass 39 a cheaper low cost price and hypersonic advance fighter jets of the world!!!mabuhay
Wow very portable, handy to fly and land within the jungle area.
This is the fighter Canada needs. The F35 could never do this even with out a full weapons or fuel load. With the money we save buying the Gripen we could pave some of our remote gravel runways which would also help with SAR efforts in the north.
Whenever the pilot is hungry, he just lands on the road and orders hamburgers in the "drive through", eats in the parking space and then takes off to get back into the fight... :D
It's amazing bro gripen is small but terrible pilot friendly too don't need a real runway even in highway they can land and take off too
That's what they truly did at the begining after WW I,landing in meadows near farmers to have a snack.Problem,one day the Colonel could not re-start the engine, so he came back to the base by train,his parachute on the shoulder .
After that it was strictly forbidden to do this!!!
r/dadjokes
There is a sandwich box in the cockpit, the jas fuel consumption is about 1/3 of many fighter jets. Viggen was better at low speed and short takeoffs, but had more drag in the air.
Other fighters: Needs a proper runway to take off and land properly
Gripen: hippity hoppity your road is now my property
Heared that sound over my hometown, dident see any flight plane, but the sound at the beginning of the video is so similar.
Might have been a JAS 39 Gripen. 🤩
Boa parceria Brasil-Suécia. Um grande salto para a FAB. Nossos antigos F5 modernizados equivalem aos F16 imagina o Gripen E nas mãos dos pilotos Brasileiros é como Neymar jogando futebol.
And hopefully your Brasilian pilots, who trains here in Sweden.....have picked up the Coolness of the Northmen!
That would be a leathal combination!
😊😎😉😃🌞
💙💛💚💙💛💚💙💛💚💙💛💚
You can see who done that, been there by the thumbs up, the rest is real concentrated, keep it up!
Nice to see, I have been to quite a few Bas 90 bases but only Hagshult, Färila and Vidsel during live exercise
Önskar jag hade fått avnjuta 37'or på vägbas...
Mönsterås
Riktigt snygg video! Skulle gärna varit där! :)
Tack! Ja det var enormt läckert!
The future fighter aircraft of the Philippines.
Matagal ng mayroon ang Thailand nito..kaya nothing to be celebrated. Common na sa ASEAN neighboooorsss...huli pa rin.
F16 yata pinili nang pinas.
And Brazil is already getting the first ones
On the road again... 👍
Vänta nu. Det är bara 70 på den vägsträckan! 🙂 /MickeP
Men där finns en fartkamera......
This is what Canada needs, plus a few straight roads/tooling stations, and it can monitor coast to coast to the north coast.
Very sad to hear that knowing Canada choose the F-35
You can land on ice and snow 🇸🇪
That was cool ! New technologies can change the world ...
Hopefully, the Philippines will choose this jet instead of the F-16
This base 90 system is the most important part of the Gripen system, via road bases you can make almost any fight a 2v1 in a short notice.
"What on earth is holding up traffic? -Sir it's fighter jets"
Landning utan övergångsbåge/Landing without transition arch?
I was there!
7:53 Trucks and cars have to wait for a while!
With a nice view! ;-)
Probably they let the traffic through between landing and take off otherwise they would have redirected the traffic further down the road. I'd say waiting time maximum 20 minutes.
How skilled the pilots need to be to land/take of with a fighter jet on a regular road?
I wish there was a way to get a few dozen of these to the Ukrainians. This would be the perfect combat aircraft for the situation they are dealing with right now. It is high tech enough to compete with aircraft such as the Su-30 and Su-35. But is also cheap, doesn't require as much maintenance as other fighters and can operate from small air strips or even highways.
I agree. Greetings from Kyiv!
Might still happen.
But it'll some time to train pilots and support crew to new platform.
Gripen💪
Try to do this with a F-35 or any other fancy fighter jet. They would probably need a couple of hours of service before they can be airborn again. Keep it simple is the right way to go.
Haha true :)
@Donald Twitter What about birds, elks, reindeer and big mosquitos that we have in Scandinavia ? Can they cope with those ?
@Donald Twitter We sweep our road bases as well, but they don't have to be 2.5 kilometres. :-)
Also, Gripen will have a turn-around of 10 minutes between air-to-air missions (fueling/re-arming) and around 20 minutes for air-to-ground missions.
Which is likely giving the SwAF better strike capability/oomph per hour than most others.
@@TheNybergCorporation And that was the general idea with "JAS" (H)unt (A)ttack and (S)urveillance . It wasn't build to be able to carrying hundreds of tons of bombs or fuel. When depleted they just land on any close "road base" and rearm and refuel and they are back to action. This is not a first strike weapon, more like fully defensive weapon. Out first strike weapon is called "Surströmming"
The F-35 and JAS-39 Gripen were explicitly designed and engineered to meet the requirements of their demands.
Nice ! :)
Thank you! Cheers!
This is the type MRF for the Philippine Air Force easy to maintain, easy to store and rugged, refuel, re arm take off and fight.
SAAB JAS - 39 GRIPEN E FIGHTER JET 🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪 💪🔥💪🔥
that road don't have to be a km long, that's amazing. like the PC24
@Donald Twitter really? Even full with ammunition?
hey @AeroPresentation I always wanted to visit a Swedish Road base I live in Sweden and all but where do I find one? near stockholm if u know any near that
I heard that the Philippines we're planning to buy a few of these beauties
Duterte have many enemys around the Islands.
Exakt three(3)!
Yes 12 Gripen was chosen instead of F-16.
@@angeldelrosario5125 Yes because there much cheaper and reliable
They choose among the two F-16 and this Gripen, budget can accomodate for 14 gripen which means the original 12 have an addtional of 2 more Gripen bringing a total of 14 gripen but F-16 also countered the offer with 12 F-16 plus an additional of 2 used/ second hand F-16 of the same amount of money but Philippine govt. decided to take the Gripen offer of 12 + 2 bringing a total of 14 brand new jets from Gripen.
@@angeldelrosario5125 Good choice!👍❤
The gripen is awsome. I don't know why more countries don't buy it.
Ljudet av frihet
💯
What if Philippines just buy has 39 gripen E rather than f-16D. Jas 39 has better radar system and maneurability than f16.
Vilken vägsträcka är det?
www.ttela.se/nyheter/regionalt/direkt-gripenplan-landar-p%C3%A5-riksv%C3%A4gen-1.49536192?fbclid=IwAR3WsqamCYdNz1Twz-e5667HWuQAlHa2bOm4qJfqoVBinxOut5aoWPMPmSI
Love to know the brake temps.
Well that is not a problem since it uses the canard wings as an air brake, look at the video, as soon as the nose wheel touchdown, the wing tilts forward. STOL design.
Can it land on real greasy road?
the Dutch should have bought this plane instead of the joint strike fighter , cheaper better and more support from the Sweden
Full EBK vid start och skarp gir precis när kärran lättat. Det är till att tänja på gränserna….
Fräckt som fasen, och är det några som behärskar detta så är det dessa gubbar!
Big fan of the Grippen and hope Canada goes with it. Like the road demo but these guys aren't going to landing on sunny cloudless days using VFR. How are you going to deal with night operations, limited visibility and snow and ice covered roads? Is there an IFR system for austere landing strips? This is a big deal for Canada.
I can't tell you how it is done, but make no mistake we get our share of crap weather!
The answer to night landings is the NILS system. These systems =NILS (and NINS) has been upgraded over the years and are now a part of Finnish fighter competition from SAAB.
www.aviationtoday.com/2002/10/01/the-gripens-nato-ized-nins/
Gripen E landing in winter climate at Vidsel airbase close to the arctic circle (=Swedish area 51:-).
www.saab.com/newsroom/stories/2020/april/cold-climate-test---harsh-weather-no-match-for-gripen-e
jas can land on the road in any condition. part of the training. also flying at 100 ft or lower!
@@jorgenpersson662 Thanks for the info Jorgen. Canada is going to have to depend on austere landing strips to defend the north. Canada has a lot of territory way north of the Artic Circle. I don't doubt that the SAF has done the drills in the winter conditions but I'm talking Artic. Being able to land the Grippen on a road or ice landing strip in the Artic winter is a big plus as long as the plane doesn't freeze on the ground. The small foot print of the ground crew means that we could have these landing strips all over the place. The USAF is testing this concept with F22s and F15s as I write this but they are still tied to a small number of airports.
@@marvidjack Gripen system is especially made to functon in winter climate on dispersed small road landing strips.
And you can just make landing strips on ice if you want...
As you see in this video you only need tools from a single 20 ft container to be able to do most maintenence, even change the engine.
th-cam.com/video/QyD0liioY8E/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=Saab
Gripen fighters have a integrated navigations system that is as good as military GPS called NINS.
You also have an integrated landing system called NILS.
These two systems makes it possible for Gripen land on austere landingstrips even in bad weather, low visibility.
www.aviationtoday.com/2002/10/01/the-gripens-nato-ized-nins/
A carrier has much broader landing strips and a wire to catch the plane. Most US carrier pilots would just refuse to set down on a public road (among trees!) like this, unless it was an emergency or they sat in a F-35.
Burkigt ljud, men schysst bild!
Jag kan tänka mig att det inte direkt är lätt att få bra ljudinspelningar av reaplan, när motorn hamnar framför kameran så blåser den ju en enorm mängd luft mot mikrofonen vilket får ljudet att låta sämre.
❤ ✈.......
🇧🇷👏
The future MRF of the Philippines
Bom dia. Belmonte BA
Come on Trudeau do your job, what are you waiting for?
Gripens must have powerful brakes
Gripen ist ein völlig unterschätztes Flugzeug. C/D sind schon gut und E/F sind für jedes andere Flugzeug harte Gegner. Der Hauptvorteil von Gripen ist die leichte Wartung/Aufrüstung die fast überall durchgeführt werden kann. Ein Gripen ist bei Bedarf viel mehr in der Luft als andere Kampfflugzeuge die auf ihre Basen angewiesen sind. Und es ist ein kleines Flugzeug mit einem kleinen Radarquerschnitt. Spektakulär sind die Landungen auf Landstraßen definitiv, noch spannender ist es wenn Gripen dazu noch mit eigener Kraft rückwärts im Wald einparkt um wieder betankt und aufmunioniert zu werden. Dieses Flugzeug könnte in der Ukraine viel bewirken und ich bin mir ziemlich sicher das russischen Piloten der "Arsch auf Grundeis" geht wenn sie wissen das praktisch überall in der Ukraine Gripen auf sie lauern könnten.
Any road anywhere.
Not any. But many places possible.
7:54 sorry drivers, we need a parking, enjoy a landscape
Sedan när började Fmv flyga utrustade med sprängkraft igen ?
Va ? Menar du extra tanken !!
@@carlbrink3964 haha näe inte den under kroppen 😂😂
@@emilahlgren2531 Vad menar du med att FMV flyger? ^^
Tror inte FMV flyger något xD
@@SonnyKnutson FMV flyger :)
That plane can land in a any street
Not really. Need a wide and straigt section
Gripen JAS 39C/ D MS20 IS tje best for Phil. PAF.as.of now.this can be upgraded to MS21 W/ AESA.radar (PS-05/A Mark 5).we hope to receive this by 2023-2024.& by 2027 JAS 39 E/F -12 UNITS.
Sepertinya jika satu engine diperbolehkan terbang pakai rudder /ada.
Ya memang kumis kucing bisa mencegah selebor..
Suitable for Indonesia air force
A Jas 39 could probably be able to start from an aircraft carrier without using a catapult and land without using a tailhook.
uh no!
Lift maybe, but not stop. The nimitz class which i belive is the biggest one is 330m.
There’s a carrier version called Gripen Maritime.
Agree..lift maybee but not stop
This is one of the operational advantages that characterize the Jas 39 and historically , because of the Cold War circumstance and the possibility of Sweden facing a total Bolshevik military invasion or the possibility of Sweden turning into a part of the nuclear war exchange in western europe theater of operations, the Swedish combat aircraft came with this specification as standard operational requirement .
However, the DPRK AF conducted similar exercises on landing and taking off the heavier platforms mig 21- mig 29 as part of their AF operational tendency to utilize the public roads as temporary mobile air bases during the total war with DY united states in case the needs for emergency landing Or that the DY americans war machine succeed in destroying , overwhelming or disrupting the work of their air bases ,
in addition to the fact that the Chinese and Bolshevik combat aircrafts come standard with the capabilities of using and being operated from unpaved runways at least to give their front line combat aircrafts the capabilities to keep pace with the rapid advancement or the maneuver of the armored and motorized formations on the ground .
However, this is an advantage that the other Western combat aircrafts do not possess, coupled with Jas39 simplicity to be service and maintained and its requirement for small service team of 5 persons lead by a single technician to service and prepare the Jas 39 during the intensive combat environment , So the Jas-39 remains superior to its Western counterparts in terms of its operational flexibility .
But the Jas39 comes with very an unrealistic price for its :
1-category as light combat aircraft ( LCA ) sharing this class with CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder and Indian Tejas .
2- characteristics and technical specifications ,
3-the structure flexibility for future expansion and growth without major redesigning , or how scalable the platform to host new hardware .
4- what it can offer on the modern battlefield ,
In the Light combat aircrafts (LCA) category there are Indian Tejas at about a third of the Jas39 price ( the 75 million DY american dollar price per tejas mk1A / mk2 Covering the costs of the long research and development stages of the platform in its two generations mk1 / mk2 , In addition to covering the production costs which include for example: the materials from which the structure is made especially especially the composite materials which make more than 75% of the materials used to construct the structure , components and devices , working hours for technician teams and workers..... etc. without ignoring the possibilities of lacking transparency between the parties involved in the project , but the indian army sites have another views droping the price to around 60 million DY americans dollar per unite and considering it very reasonable price in comparison with the very high prices the DY americans and swedish aviation manufacturers are offering India for the F21 / Jas39 platforms , and defending the awarded contract to HAL by saying that : the Indian Tejas still cheaper by 50% than the DY american F21 and about 30% than the swedish Jas39 and the full amount will be spend it inside India , Otherwise the Tejas mk1 still presented for domestic and export at 26 million DY american dollar per unit , although most of its components were locally develop while the upgrading program to the mk2 standard were conducted utilizing foreign technologies which are generally speaking off the shelf components and offered at much cheaper prices than financial resources dedicated for developing new technology from scratch ) .
In the same time the design of Indian Tejas makes it a platform that can be scalable over the time , so that the technological and technical advantages and qualities that currently enjoys by the Jas39 will fade away over the time , for example the Wide Area Display (WAD) used by swedish platform Jas39 is the same as that used on Indian Tejas mk2 and perhaps from the same supplier .
However, the Jas39 outperforms its Indian counterparts with the stability and expertise of industrial infrastructure, especially the aerospace industries and its complementary subsidiary industries, so SAAB can meet the commitments of construction and delivery rates steadily and spending time and resources on expanding the capabilities and roles of its platform by further developing the structure the hardware , software and other components of the aircrafts , On the hand the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) still struggling to organize the work of production lines and the indian Tejas comes with continuous delays .
In my opinion after excluding the geopolitical considerations, the Chinese J10 family and bolsheviks mig35 a much better platforms in all aspects that play a major roles in enhancing the survivability and improving combat characteristics of the combat aircrafts , Beside both platforms situated in higher category as the medium weight multi role combat aircrafts which hinder any possible sale of those Chinese and Bolsheviks combat aircrafts to some parts of the world especially to the western hemisphere ( With the exception of Finland, which acquired during the Cold War MiG-21 and Mi-8 helicopters beside other weapon systems including air defence systems , radar systems ...etc , and the Nokia Corporation for Communications and Micro-Technology was one of the windows of the Bolshevik military-industrial complex and with it the Bolshevik war machine on the Western technology, it is strange that Sukhoi did not try to offer Su-35 on the Finish competition to replace the F/A-18 fighters ) .
And in the same time with the larger and heavier platform comes standard extra capabilities like enhanced : flying characteristic , combat capabilities and potentials growth and expanding . and both platforms offered for between 30 - 35 milion DY american dollar when the swedish platform Jas39 are presented for 80 million DY americans dollar , which is a price close to the bolsheviks Su-35 aircraft which is real air superiority platform with great deep strike capabilities , make it a very flexible multi-roles platform comes and due to its large size comes with great potentials for future expansion and growth .
While the limited technological advantages the Jas 39 possesses at this time for example : active & passive awareness systems , unified electronic warfare suits, and sensor fusion ....etc will be diminish over time when the Chinese and bolsheviks will develop their technologies or in near future when they will finish deploying their 5th gen combat aircrafts saturation their frontline squadrons with the stealthy combat aircrafts they will turn their attention to integrate those new technologies developed for the 5th gen platforms onboard existing ( 4 plus and 4 plus plus ) platforms as the 5th gen combat aircrafts were mostly stealthy platforms described as high-end niche quality platforms .
This is why I do not think that it will be the workhorse of the air forces in both countries in times of peace , and it will be used economically , with a focus in traditional employment roles on conducting high-value tasks and duties , in addition to its use in combat simulation exercises , training , developing the employment principles and doctrine of the stealth aircrafts , same things for the operational preferences which is to large extent already a standard requirements in those Chinese and Bolsheviks platforms ...
However for the time being and in comparison with the DY americans offered platforms I strongly believe the Jas 39 still suiting the defensive needs of the countries surrounding russia in addition to the countries of east and central europe especially when all those countries share with sweden the same strategic defense needs and requirements .
Worth noting here that the south korean future fighter aircraft KAI KF-21 Boramae/Fighting Hawk (formerly known as KF-X) with its twin engines , very modern & stealthy design , very reasonable price , superior flying characteristics and advanced combat capabilities , will give the Jas 39 and the DY americans F16/21 and F/A 18 super hornet with its conventional designing very difficult time especially when it's being offered with transferring technologies and local manufacturing ,and the south korean platform with its open architect will be very scalable to accept third party hardwares , softwares and weapon systems .
.... Always And Forever May GOD Bless The Un United States Of HM Shninasios .....
You are from a parallel reality - the concept of BOLSHEVIK died 100 years ago.
Roughly the same nonsense in other arguments ...
@@user-kw4jw4jd2o Regarding the subject of discussion the Jas39 , I wish if you waste your time on putting objective comment instead of this empty political statement , I am not an expert, and I do not claim this but for me my comment makes sense...
If you have points you should put it in your comment instead of this empty generalizing .
I call them BOLSHEVIKS because I WANT TO , and no one ask for your opinion , And if I live in a parallel world, it would be better to call China bolsheviks but I did not although it is govern by a communist party.
But your President Putin calls the members of the military and intelligence establishments and the rest of the state apparatus comrades, a term taken from the miserable Soviet Union era, and do not forget the reinstall the red star as the emblem of the military establashment .
And all the members of the first ranks of the Bolshevik leadership are children of the Bolshevik regime
And if we exclude several aspects in the modern russia for examole including :
1- the pattern of economic activity.
2-the mechanism of directed and controlled elections,
3- the regulated freedom of opinion,
4 religious freedom, which is important for strategic reasons, then the current regime is a Bolshevik regime, but in a modern way .
In the end, it is not a bad idea to support nostalgic feeling for the past if it is serving a purpose without losing sense with the needs and requirements of the present time , because it will give modern bolsheviks state a wider dimension at least to whom were considered as ideological allies and sphere of influence where I think the miserable communist ideology still have many supporters between many countries allows the intelligence services of the Bolsheviks to re-weave the bonds of their relations with the Bolshevik parties and movements around the world, especially \many strategic parts of the world whom which is important for the national security of the modern bolsheviks state like : eastern europe,or the warsaw pact countries and Central & south america ...
... Always And Forever May GOD Bless The Un United States Of HM Shnina ...
@@eagleeye6691 As for Gripen, he has extremely little chance of surviving in a battle with any modern Russian fighter ... In addition, Gripen is a very emergency one - on TH-cam you can easily find 5-10 crashes of this "masterpiece" .... with the death of the pilots.
Poland and other countries of the former Warsaw Pact continue to support the ancient Su-22 and MiG-29, despite the lack of original parts for repair, due to their undeniable combat effectiveness. While the much newer F-16s are in endless repairs ...
Russia, back in the early 90s, abandoned single-engine combat aircraft ... since the loss of a single engine is guaranteed to lead to the loss of an aircraft.
Now, however, the development of two alternative single-engine fighters is already underway. mainly for export, but also for Russia with the possibility of a manned and unmanned version, with artificial intelligence.
Although, in the USSR there were great single-engine fighters MiG-21 and MiG-23.
$ 60 million is extremely expensive for Gripen !!! For the Russian Aerospace Forces, even significantly large, twin-engine aircraft (Su-30SM, Su-34, Su-35, Su-57 - the fifth generation !!!) are cheaper! The price of western aircraft is dominated by the corruption component ... Therefore, with the military budget 13 times !!! less than that of the United States, "poor" Russia is capable of destroying all NATO countries in a day ....
But Putin is a GREAT HUMANIST! So live ... for now)))
@@eagleeye6691 th-cam.com/video/eMEH6LG9_iQ/w-d-xo.html
@@user-kw4jw4jd2o Bullshit. There has only been one Gripen crash which caused the death of the pilot, and that was in Thailand. No pilots have died in the 30 years that Sweden has used the Gripen. Compared to older jets there have been extremely few crashes and deaths.
Land
Refuel
Rearm
Fika
Take off
=>10 minutes
En dammsugare till fika +3 minuter.
Terrible gripen saab jas-39 smart jet ng Sweden kahit highway mag- landing pwede.. ASAP agad deliver na dto filipinas pra AFP- PAF..
This is the only Saab I want
ดูเจ้าชายท่านยังสมใจเรือบรรทุกเครื่องบินอยู่ไหมฉันคิดว่าขนาดของฝูงบิน 35 เครื่องกำลังดี +40
Mungkin sebagai pemecah es di sayap..
Kanatlarda silah yüklü değil,tam silah yükü ile böyle sert bir inişi başaramayacagı kanaatindeyim,ama yine de kısa yarıcaplı görevler için iyi bir uçak.Tek handikapı,motor dahil çogu bileşenleri İsveç in değil,ihracaatta sorun çıkma ihtimali var,g.korenin T50 si gibi.Her ülkeye serbestçe satamazsınız.
Maximum range is 4000 km.
4:47
Sweet Swedes 💯👍🇳🇱 Ukraine; go for this magnificent plane 👏👏👏
ถือว่าจ่ายค่าเทอมนะพี่สี
Detta bästa alternativ för Finland. Men amerikaner "tvingar" köpa sämre fighter.. Med leksaks vapen, som det gick år 1994,.. Först på 2000 talet bättre vapen under vingar, när kongressen i USA gick med
In Germany that is impossible...
long straight sections of autobahns are designated as emergency airstrips
Could it i be Gripen?
Imagine nations with Gripens and Saab. Nobody would dare...
Naa, it’s a MiG 21…
Using roadbases fits Finnish way of fighting as well. It’s like guerilla warfare with planes… The planes that requires a lot of support from bases will have problems in a fight with Russia since those bases will be gone day one of fighting…
@@Mikeatthenet That's true. But Lockheed Martin is now offering 64 F-35A with weapons like JASSM-ER. Saab just can't beat that.
@@jussihaila But Finland already have JASSM?? And how is the Finnish requirements on wartime support handled in that concept? Finland required more or less domestic support?
Be aware of tictac out of the blue lol
Yg kedua untuk kencing manis
Bättre kan NI. Jag skäms!
Förklara.
Very cool. Swedes have been doing this for decades. I wonder what Greta thinks.
She is totally irrelevant
@@AeroPresentation I was just kidding. I know she is a nothing.
@@iananderson7883 On the contrary, she's far from nothing - which every blunt and diminishing comment of her kinda proves.
However, in this context I totally agree with @AeroPresentation - here she's irrelevant. It's a great video of something even greater. And I actually think she approves by the way. Her freedom is based on certain things, and what we're watching here is one of them.
@@jemakrol Jesus Christ I was just kidding lighten up a little bit. Sheesh. But quite honest she is nothing but a a joke.
@@iananderson7883 we'll, that's the thing. You're the one making "jokes". On behalf of others. That's on you, not me. We can discuss the impact of Greta bit surely there's a better place for that. Let's appreciate the beauty of the Gripen here instead, shall we?
ยากให้เปลืยนโฉมหน้ากรีพเพนหน้าเล็กกว่านี้ช่วงล่างใหม่เรียแหลมพับปีกได้ก็จะเป็นซูปเปอร็กรีฟเพนไปเลย😂😂😂ช่องอากาศใต้ปีกใหญ่เท่าเอฟสามห้า
If Pablo Escobar alive..hell buy this