shatru bodh bhi nahi hai mitr bodh bhi nahi hai ... aur jaise ke saath waisa karne ki icchha kabhi kabhi mitr se zyada hai lekin asal shatru ke saath organize hone ke prati udasinta hai varna hum dekh paate ke islam represents special kind of evil against which modism too will fall short ... yogi yogi yogi
Sir If you read BORI mahabharata you will when karna killed ghatotgacha lord krishna said about karna power that if karna had his kavach kundlas he would become invincible and if eklavya had his thumb he would seemed as second Parshurama ❤
And Krishna also said in van parva, there is no difference between Arjun and me, अर्जुन और कृष्ण में कोई अंतर नहीं है दोनों एक है कृष्ण कहते हैं तुम मुझसे अलग नहीं हो मैं तुमसे भिन्न नहीं हूंl
If so tell the what is correct by reference original Sanskrit texts when you found that? Do not quote leftist or communist written text for references.
Half baked knowledge. Karna was daan veer and gave up his kawach and Kundal knowing fully well who was taking it away from him. Please do not mix caste system / narrative to go against Eklavya or Karna. Amy Ganatra is a confused desi living in US and does not know everything.
सही विश्लेषण है 🎉🎉🎉
Very fine message
❤
🙂🙏🚩
shatru bodh bhi nahi hai mitr bodh bhi nahi hai ... aur jaise ke saath waisa karne ki icchha kabhi kabhi mitr se zyada hai lekin asal shatru ke saath organize hone ke prati udasinta hai varna hum dekh paate ke islam represents special kind of evil against which modism too will fall short ... yogi yogi yogi
Sir If you read BORI mahabharata you will when karna killed ghatotgacha lord krishna said about karna power that if karna had his kavach kundlas he would become invincible and if eklavya had his thumb he would seemed as second Parshurama ❤
And Krishna also said in van parva, there is no difference between Arjun and me,
अर्जुन और कृष्ण में कोई अंतर नहीं है दोनों एक है
कृष्ण कहते हैं
तुम मुझसे अलग नहीं हो मैं तुमसे भिन्न नहीं हूंl
Just SC victim cards artificially derived from epics
कर्ण के बारे में इससे गलत और भ्रमित व्याख्या हो ही नहीं सकती। This is completely absurd.
Ok neeli ande
Then please explain the right thing and provide resources below.
If so tell the what is correct by reference original Sanskrit texts when you found that? Do not quote leftist or communist written text for references.
real.mahabharat padhiya usma pta chalega ki Arjun kya tha akala dum par virath yudh mai sabko dhul chata di Arjun na
Arjun was the BEST
Half baked knowledge. Karna was daan veer and gave up his kawach and Kundal knowing fully well who was taking it away from him. Please do not mix caste system / narrative to go against Eklavya or Karna. Amy Ganatra is a confused desi living in US and does not know everything.
Vo Krishan ke viruddh adharm me saath khade the... Bs itna hi kaafi h
You may be right about Ami Ganatra but you are half right about Karna...
Just like james bond is the invincible , playboy hero of Ian Fleming , so is arjun pandey for vyasa ! 😁
U Rasc@l. Vyas is a Shaktyavesha avatar of lord krishna. Arjuna himself is nara from nara narayana avatar. @@jasonvoorheese666
@@jasonvoorheese666 You are calling the entire Mahabharata a lie. Watch TV a little less.