M1 Macbook Pro THE TRUTH About Video Editing Performance
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
- Testing out the new M1 Macbook Pro against the Mac Pro a Custom Built PC and a Dell XPS 17" Laptop. - Big thanks Storyblocks for Sponsoring this video: www.storyblock...
WATCH THIS VIDEO IN SPANISH ➡ • M1 Macbook Pro 13 BATA...
=============================
🎥 Gear I Use to Make Videos:
=============================
1. Sony FX3 ➡ geni.us/snefx3
2. Sony A1 ➡ geni.us/snea1
3. Favorite Prime Lens ➡ geni.us/sne50mm
4. Favorite Zoom Lens ➡ geni.us/SRNJ
5. Favorite Wide Angle Lens ➡ geni.us/sne20mm
6. Favorite Mic ➡ geni.us/HBlED
7. Complete Gear List ➡ geni.us/63wdV
=============================
💰 Best Deals for Camera Gear!
=============================
Amazon Top Deals ➡ geni.us/amzdeals
B&H Deal Zone ➡ bhpho.to/2JuarKS
=============================
🤓 Follow Me:
=============================
Twitter: / mondobytes
Instagram: / mondobytes
Facebook: / mondobytes
=============================
🎵 Music & SFX:
=============================
My go to for music + SFX: audiio.com/mon... get 70% (yes, 70%) off your first year of unlimited music + sound effects with my code MONDOBYTES
=============================
👕 Merchandise:
=============================
These are T-Shirt designs that I think look cool and love to wear, if you're interested in buying you can visit my store here ➡ teespring.com/...
=============================
📜 Affiliate Disclosure:
=============================
Some of the links used in the description will direct you to Amazon, as an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
=============================
#M1 #Apple #MacbookPro
Two things we can safely conclude:
1. M1 is an impressive piece of hardware;
2. Adobe doesn't care about you one tiny bit.
Adobe SUX, they've been snotty to Mac users for the last 20 years. They dragged their feet when OS-X came out, Photoshop was one of the last big apps to be ported. Ironically they had recently brought out In-Design, and got it ported first, way before Quark Express. Due to that In-Design overtook Quark. Adobe was very slow in the Intel transition as well.
I think they do it just takes time, yesterday i saw improved performance results on M1 with Premiere BETA
This video also prove that premiere rendereris absolute garbage
if adobe can't get premiere to run properly on x86 I think we should be thankful that adobe got premiere to run on m1 at all lol
@Nathaniel Walker by running properly i meant stability not like premiere can't run on a traditional x86 processor and the truth is premiere crashes a lot more than it should which in turn cause fustration for the user
In my experience Premiere isn’t optimised for Intel either.
💀💀🤣
Can confirm it runs like shit on AMD as well.
Premiere is optimised for online subscription licensing.
Premier is optimised for Adobe’s bottom line.
@@esphilee haha, best comment
Honestly I came here to see how the editing experience was and not how fast/slow exporting time is. I’ve read some reviews that the M1 MBP struggles dealing with a 4K timeline, dropping frames and gets slow. That’s what really matters before exporting.
I feel like this video also shows how much better Resolve is at exporting/rendering video as well.
Its honestly the way to go right now!
Damn I see you DaVinci Resolve
Only Davinici
Davinci is so unintuitive or am i wrong
Yo this video is crispy AF!
is it shot in 24p?
@@petrub27 24,5p
@@daviiid45 you good ?
THE SOUUUND
Yes
Premiere to M1: I'm gonna ruin you.
DaVinci to M1: Don't worry, I gotcha.
Adobe: Hey google, define “optimization.”
“I found this on the internet”.
“I don’t get it...”
Love the quality!
What about timeline snappiness and editing experience? Render times are important, but I missed your comments regarding the other aspect of a real editing process. Great video anyways!
Adobe Software just Looks so poor, other companies like blackmagic or serif labs already have optimized versions and Adobe as big software company didn’t even managed to get Photoshop optimized
Because they don’t have to do anything thanks to their subscription model.
They absolutely don’t give a fuck, the best exemple is the state of photoshop on the ipad... It’s pitiful.
Blackmagic gave optimized version, but they are half assed and full of bugs. Adobe doesn't but at least it works
@@strivold4922 lol what are you on about Adobe is full bugs and half backed codec as well. And alot of people experience problems becuase they do not have the right spec for the specific job. I.e not enough vram or system ram and they wonder why the software keeps crashing randomly. Have used premier and resolve I have less problem with resolve and when I di have problem with resolve I can easily identify the pro level.
@@zoetmoments5625 You apparently never used them extensively in a professional environment.
Premiere has its quirk, but in comparison to Resolve it's nothing. Resolve has years long reported bugs that Blackmagic never fixed. In that there is some project corruption bug that happens everytime you reload the project (and this has nothing to do with specs but how the software was architectured).
If you do basic editing and color grading Resolve is great, but if you push it it is extremely bugged and nearly unusable. Especially when you are using Fusion back and forth
I understand the importance of export times, but how is the editing experience? Were there too many dropped frames with the M1 chip to edit halfway efficiently? For me, I don't mind waiting 2 hours for a video to export (you know, most of the time), but if the editing experience is too laggy to work in a timely manner, that's the big dealbreaker for me.
Agree, export is coffee/break time, stuttering during editing kills me slowly
Same here. That was my biggest problem with the imac pro and the reason I got an mba m1. I've been editing on Resolve and find it much much snappier than the 10 core imac pro i use at work. It does start to struggle once the timeline gets busy if your timeline is 4K, but drop it down to 1080 and it runs as smooth as 480p, and then at the end I just flick it to 4K before export.
Gotta try FCP soon, it's been 6 years since I last used it so there's a learning curve.
@@AlumarsX Thanks for this. I'm running a fairly old Mac that was decent back in the day but now it's starting to struggle. I've been looking into PCs just because the higher end Macs are way expensive, but I'm intrigued by this new M1 Mac Mini. It's encouraging to hear that the editing experience is smooth, because yeah, I can deal with the longer export times if it will save me $3K.
@@derekhollenberg2643 Wait for the possibility of the M1X on the next Macbook Pro update which might be around spring/summer 2021 if you'll see yourself keeping it for a while.
I needed a computer now, so I jumped in, but if the following iterations keep getting noticeably faster, I'll just sell this and upgrade. For the moment though, I'm very happy with it.
@@AlumarsX Thanks again. It's going to be close in terms of how much longer I can hold out--but a Mac Mini plus a Macbook later next year may still be cheaper than other options, lol.
love the color grading, appreciate the time & energy - must been very time consuming to run all those test. well done
Haha thanks, this video took a VERY long time to make.
Nice video .I’m a Latino from California but I’m in Vegas . I shoot mainly canon . I’m going to get the r5 for 4K music videos . I edit premiere pro so will the dell XPS be able to handle top quality 4K or will playback end up choppy at times . Also is it smoother if I record into an atomos with r5 ?
Me: looking to buy cheapest M1 Mac mini
This guy: Cameras more expensive than my house, car, kids, soul, etc.
@Nathaniel Walker why?
@Nathaniel Walker what are your usage?
@Nathaniel Walker Does it not work for video editing?
Great vid! LOVE the slider shots! As a FCP boy I'm stoked for M1!
Where's the truth about editing? I just see exporting here.
I like the vid, but I agree. I wanna know if any frames are dropped when editing hi-res video / of any other issues *while* editing
This for sure
Armando - this is a great hands-on, real world use case demo! Too many TH-camrs are "geeking out" with the synthetic benchmarks, and while they are impressive numbers, this is real world. Too many people are talking out the concept of selling MacPros for M1 chip machines. Your video shows 2-important things; 1) MacPros are still viable, having a far wider use case that some what to present, and 2) proof that an M{x} chipset for MacPros will be amazing. My only hope is that Apple provides a physical upgrade path / program to swap-out for the M{x} chips.
I have the 16gb version MacBook Pro with Final Cut, DaVinci Resolve 17 and Avid installed. Avid isn't great (it never is on Mac) but the performance for both DaVinci and Final Cut is insane for a 13 inch MacBook.
That review looks like a Hollywood movie and underlines the expertise of the reviewer. Love it
This just proves, no matter what the case, a custom PC will get you the best value for your money, and you can game on it.
I'd love to see how you build a custom laptop for less.
actually that m1 MacBook got better score in FCPX than that 5k$ custom pc in any software. and since FCPX is far better than premiere pro for many people (it's hard to argue with that), that tiny laptop beats all those huge custom boxes of hardware in every way, even when it comes to price of hardware and software.
yea right? I'm gonna bring 22 lbs pc on my backpack then
Clearly you didnt get the video.... This little entry level laptop is cheaper than the rest ca compete and sometimes beat more expensive desktops... Can’t wait when apple releases m1 macs with discrete graphics card...
This ting is like less than 2k
Bruh you went all out on the cinematography for a review 😂 top class
I currently takes me about 24-36 hours on a good day where I can’t touch my laptop for anything else to export a Premiere Pro full 1080p timeline 20 min video so.... I’m okay with this to say the least.
Thank you so much for making this video. I was really on the fence about getting the M1. All the hype was starting to get to me, but I primarily edit 4k/6k raw in Premiere and DaVinci, so I was nervous... Glad I didn't pull the trigger and got to see your video first! Thanks again, Armando! Also, the b-roll in this video was SICK!
Please what computer do you use for your Editing @ 4/6k raw in premiere and Da Vinci??
Me that just wants to edit videos in 1080p/ 4K with 60fps : •___•
Damn, all the visuals and the cinematography of this video were amazing, Armando!
Thanks Ryan
Great video. However the one thing you didn't cover, that matters a lot, perhaps even more than export times is whether the machine can play back in real time. My own experiences with Final Cut Pro X are that it can play back any Sony A7s III 10bit 4:2:2 file and the same for Canon R5 - including the 8K IPB, which plays back incredibly smoothly. DaVinci Resolve does not play back the 8K file in real time, which is disappointing and I hope they fix that. But it does play back the R5's 4K HQ files very well, and also the A7s III files. Thanks for your work on this!
For someone who primarily uses final cut Pro X for multi cam edits would you recommend the laptop?
@@dsdhesi absolutely! It’s an unbelievably great video editing machine.
@@DavidSkok1 thanks for the recommendation 🙌
Most people are looking at these first Apple Silicon Macs wrong - these aren't Apple's powerhouse machines: they're simply the annual spec bump of the lowest end Apple computers with DCI-P3 displays, Wifi 6, and the new Apple Silicon M1 SoC.
They have the same limitations as the machines they replace - 16 GB RAM and two Thunderbolt ports.
These are the machines you give to a student or teacher or a lawyer or an accountant or a work-at-home information worker - folks who need a decently performing machine with decent build quality who don't want to lug around a huge powerhouse machine (or pay for one for that matter). They're still marketed at the same market segment, though they now have a vastly expanded compute power envelope.
The real powerhouses will probably come next year with the M1x (or whatever). Apple has yet to decide on an external memory interconnect and multichannel PCIe scheme, if they decide to move in that direction.
Other CPU and GPU vendors and OEM computer makers take notice - your businesses are now on limited life support. These new Apple Silicon models can compete speed-wise up through the mid-high tier of computer purchases, and if as I expect Apple sells a ton of these many will be to your bread and butter customers.
In fact, I suspect that Apple - once they recover their R&D costs - will be pushing the prices of these machines lower while still maintaining their margins - while competing computer makers will still have to pay Intel, AMD, Qualcomm, and nVidea for their expensive processors, whereas Apple's cost goes down the more they manufacture. Competing computer makers may soon be squeezed by Apple Silicon price/performance on one side and high component prices on the other. Expect them to be demanding lower processor prices from the above manufacturers so they can more readily compete, and processor manufacturers may have to comply because if OEM computer manufacturers go under or stop making competing models, the processor makers will see a diminishing customer base.
I believe the biggest costs for a chip fab are startup costs - no matter what processor vendors would like you to believe. Design and fab startup are _expensive_ - but once you start getting decent yields, the additional costs are silicon wafers and QA. The more of these units Apple can move, the lower the per unit cost and the better the profits.
So ... who should buy these M1 Macs?
If you're in the target demographic - the student, teacher, lawyer, accountant, or work-at-home information worker - this is the Mac for you.
If you're a heavy computer user like a creative and don't simply want a light and cheap computer with some additional video and sound editing capability for use on the go - I'd wait for the M1x (or whatever) next year. You'll probably kick yourself next year when the machines targeted at _you_ finally appear.
Lesson here: Use DaVinci Resolve 😆
Premiere does a lot of its rendering on the CPU so it does not require the whole frame to be loaded into GPU VRAM. In DaVinci resolve you need enough VRAM to render high resolutions, 8GB of VRAM from the GTX 2060 is no way near enough, you need more like 16-24GB VRAM. The reason that the M1 could render was that is has shared GPU memory, so it had access to more VRAM.
It's RTX 2060 not GTX.
I've been working on 4k and 6k projects in Davinci Resolve with an 8 GB GPU. Never had an issue. You don't need such a big GPU to work in Resolve unless you are working in 8k or more.
where the 1080p gang at? I'm joking
I appreciate the work you’ve done to produce this video. To see someone in your craft give a honest review is this was awesome to watch.
The shot from 1:04 - 1:20 blew me away! How did you get that so steady?
Slow motion
I've got the smaller 16gig version of the Macbook Pro M1, I'm using it for video editing and photography, and I'm pretty much satisfied with performance, and battery life is just awesome.
The pros use Arri Alexa and Red cameras and those files work great on Final Cut.
very interesting results and as always going the extra mile Armando ! hats off to you buddy !
Armando is the MKBHD of film gear reviews
Actually is this is the best video right now that helps you for your purchasing decision as a video editor. All other videos heavily focus on Final Cut Pro, an old version of DaVinci Resolve or don't mix up the video format and codecs. Good Job 👌🏽.
Heavily considering investing in learning Resolve in-depth. It just seems that with Resolve I can squeeze everything out of my custom PC
I just did the switch from premiere pro to davinci resolve, and It really wasn't as big of a jump as i thought it would be, and it is soooo much better at processing video! You should do it :)
I started by using FCPX but started learning Resolve when I purchased a BMPCC 6K. I really like Resolve better than Final Cut. The color grading tools in Resolve blow it right out of the water. The only thing that Final Cut has over it is access to more plugins transitions and drag/drop special effects that you can purchase. I’m sure that will change in time but you also have Fusion built into Resolve. Both are great tools and I use them both for different things. I do like Resolve more though.
@@robertfratacci thanks man!
Decent vid, but I don't get why most reviewers are obsessed with just export times. What about timeline performance while actually editing?! Scrubbing, dropped frames, smoothness, with a normal project with multi clips, transitions, maybe a lut etc?
Because export times is measurable, timeline performance is not because there’s thousands of variables. Codecs, frame rates, resolutions, VFX, Sound Design, Length, Color Grading, etc. Anyone one of those things can drastically throw off timeline performance.
Armando, thanks for this video. I appreciate the effort to give "real world" performance comparisons. It is illuminating to see the performance of industrial hardware when compared to pro-sumer gear in a likely work scenario. You definitely see the trade-offs that are being made between cost and processing time and how much these trade-offs are starting to shrink in some situations. This is exactly the type of review that is so valuable because it allows people to compare the benefits and drawbacks to a system and select the system that meets their particular needs/limitations. This video is a real contribution to the creative community. There is a difference between "fanboy" advertisements and critical review and you definitely are the in the camp of the latter.
Very well done video overall. I would like to point out a few things however.
1. Most people don’t buy a Mac with 2 TB of flash storage. It isn’t exactly fair to compare it to other computers at the $2,300 price tag because a huge chunk of that is just storage. 2 TB can be nice on the road but external storage is easy to do and a lot more affordable. For most users this would be a much lower cost computer and nowhere near the $2,300 in this video.
2. I understand there is a lot of excitement about the M1 but this is an entry level chip in an entry level computer and completely unrealistic to expect it to beat a desktop computer. The M1 GPU is very impressive for how little of power it uses and what it can do compared to other integrated graphics computers but it’s still integrated graphics vs a dedicated GPU. The M1 is the budget entry level Mac right now and never meant to be a high end system replacement. The upcoming Apple Silicon 16” MBP and iMac would be a lot more accurate to compare to these other computers.
3. The M1 has hardware decoding for some 10bit HEVC formats that not even a Nvidia 3090 can do right now. If anybody shoots with a DSLR using some more difficult to edit formats the M1 may actually be much faster. Some formats render faster and playback perfectly smooth on the M1 vs a 12 core Mac Pro. So it kind of depends of the type of footage. The higher compressed formats will see a huge advantage on the M1. The higher end formats like Raw that depend on brute force processing will not perform as well because this is an entry level chip.
4. What makes the M1 amazing is the battery power, low fan noise and low heat compared to other computers. It may render slower but everything it does it does just as well on battery power. In the field away from power that matters more to some people vs render speed on a desk. It can edit for half a day sitting at Starbucks just as well as it can on a desk plugged into power. This makes it more realistic as a field computer to check footage, organize media, assemble a rough cut and so forth. If one is on a long location project it can still render if need be to upload daily’s or client approvals. There are dozens of reasons to get a M1 over just render speed. It’s really about the balance of power and efficiency unlike anything Intel or AMD has in this entry level chip class and integrated graphics.
Offtopic: can i use macbook air m1 8gb/256ssd option for after effect?
You saved me from buying a new macbook with an M1 processor because I use premiere pro and I would be PISSED. I won't be updating until Adobe optimizes premiere for it. Thanks for this video!
Shiiiiiit my cuzzo is an Apple genius, and he almost sold me on an M1. Glad I stayed up all these hours. I use Adobe PP and would've been livid to find it not working.
Recently it’s working better
In other words, M2 is going to be a beast and I should wait for it.
And more expensive
I think there's a huge point people aren't paying attention to this is literally a laptop that can fit into almost any bag good luck lugging a mac pro or full tower pc with all your peripherals, I am thoroughly impressed.
I dont care about the exporting or rendering time. I care about the editing experience.
Edit in Premiere Pro, color in Resolve and export out of Resolve
Where do you do your audio mixing? Also Premiere? Because I recently had major trouble getting my sound settings from Premiere transferred to Resolve. Recently started thinking about just using Fairlight for audio mixing. Also how do you transfer your projects between Premiere Pro? Final Cut 7 XMLs?
@@LukasHauf I use audition for my audio and I haven't had any issues. And yes I use XML files. XML files are readable over multiple platforms, idk why Adobe calls them Final Cut XML files there just XML. Is your Premiere updated fully?
Why nut fully edit in resolve
@@user-dh5fp4gw1b you could but I prefer to edit in Premiere because I have custom windows and workflow that I've been using for years
@@tazistarfire thats pretty smart! Do you know if i can like move the tabs in resolve?? I was thinking about editing on my m1 and letting it playback on a 4k tv or reversed
Your chart design is the best I've seen!
DaVinci Resolve is Adobe's biggest competitor. You can be sure that Adobe is very concerned about not falling behind on the M1 platform. I've heard that a beta version of Premiere is going to be released before Christmas. That would suggest that a commercial version of Premiere adapted for the M1 could appear as early as Q1 or Q2 in 2021.
It’s not an editing benchmark, it’s an export benchmark
Man I’m so jealous of your desk setup👏👏👏👏. Great video just stumbled upon your channel. Just ordered the base model m1 pro. Can’t wait to pick it up tomorrow. 😬
I remember many years ago you started off Android fan boy. Good to see you have changed your mind and come around to Apple
I believe he uses both Android and iOS/Apple, as do I.
The cinematography is the best i've seen for a review, awesome work!
Nice comparison - I'm still reocking MBP 16" and will continue to do son until they come out with a pro M1 MB with a bigger screen. But it's very impressive to see this kind of performance from a fairly cheap MB. Exciting times!
Super useful video for me. I'm planning on switching from Windows to a Mac for my main editing computer, and I can basically switch it up and get a laptop for my main device and hopefully with the new M2 chip it will be great in Resolve for what I need to do for my work.
your test(!) is solely aimed at rendering which most editors dont worry about too much. Try instead the day to day task of scrolling the timeline and you will see a significant improvement wih the M1 chip vs expensive PC graphics cards.
Watch my next video coming in a few days 😉
Astonishing video! Thanks for running this superb tests 🙌🏻💥
Premiere is decent for a few very select workflows. I converted 10bit 4K footage 24-120fps from my a7siii and turned it into ProRes 4:4:4 HLG. I ended up exporting 4K 24fps HDR video for a music video. Surprisingly it did it fast about 15 minutes for a 5 minute HDR clip (obviously it won’t be in the range of real time rendering, it’s hdr and the bitrate is much higher than most reviewers test with). I’d love to see someone test a similar project on resolve and final cut as I have no experience on how well those programs handle HDR.
Premiere is buggy with simple things but surprisingly due to how old it’s legacy programming is, the support for obscure formats that aren’t h.264 and pro res is high. Final cut has speed, resolve has speed and color, and premiere while buggy has support for tons of formats.
Thank you so much considering a macbook for my new editing pc and was comparing vs the m2 base model
You have not tested other performances like Preview scrubbing and smoothness
watching this right now on my m1...the hype is real
Then the problem right now is that “some” softwares are not optimized yet for the M1
Very strange.. The M1 couldn't play my timeline without being choppy (3 gopro camera's) said it would take over 20 hours to render. My i9 Pc did it in under 30 minutes.
Super interesting results! Thanks for sharing Armando. Looking forward to the next iteration of 16” MacBook pros since I like to edit on the go. Also...B roll is on point!
Hey Armando. So good to see an unhyped review/test/comparison, call it what you will. Very interesting results. I guess what we’re all really waiting to see is how the Apple SOC architecture scales up to higher level hardware. Interesting times! Thanks.
Thanks, Armando! Very detailed and thorough (and great-looking!) video! Tiny little suggestion for your script/narration: it kept throwing me when you'd give the longest time for a test, then say "followed by" the next fastest, then "followed by" again. To me, it makes more sense to first say the fastest, which is then "followed by" the next fastest, etc. I understand you meant it either in terms of when you ran the tests or simply when you revealed the next result, but I think it's less confusing in timed tests if "followed by" means "next longest". Again, tiny nitpick...it didn't take really take away from the excellent video!
Make a comparison for hevc 10 bit 422 files to see what happens...
This is all great and everything but where’s our C70 video? Lol 😂
Seriously some of the best reviews on YT. Another fire one, Armando.
No testing with popular formats used by action cams, smartphones and Mirrorless. And no real world editing, just exporting. Also, the Puget spec build (it doesn't matter who built it if done correctly) was easily the best value. An equivalent Puget spec PC you're showing could be built in 2020 for less than £1,500 - I built a 3970x, 128GB RAM & 3090 for less than £3,600 that same year featuring mostly used hardware barring ram & GPU.
Unless a rapid turn over is required, which usually means videos that are less than 15 - 20 minutes (typically well under 15 minutes) then export really isn't what the majority need to know. Most want to know about reliability, real-time playback & scrubbing.
BTW the reason I mention playback, scrubbing & common media formats is because most watching a YT vid usually only have access to and/or a budget for hardware that uses such popular media which is known to be taxing on the system during the editing process.
What most people use/have; mirrorless like a Sony Alpha, a GoPro and a Samsung Galaxy Phone or iPhone whilst their budget to edit is typically under £2,000. Export times are a happy bonus. A buttery smooth editing experience is what's desired the most by any editor.
The reality is that Premiere is still the industry standard, even is their software is bloated and buggy. Until they optimize things on their end, these new M1 machines don't mean much for people who have to share project files with other professionals. If you don't have to bounce files to people for larger projects then just use FCP since it clearly runs best on Mac. Premiere is honestly kind of a pain, but only a fraction of video professionals currently use FCP for client work. Not saying this is a good thing, but it is reality for the time being.
would be nice to see how AVID compares, given it's industry standard software
So pretty much Apple works best if everything you own in your life is Apple too.
Im sticking with XPS 17... but strongly considering ditching premiere pro for good. It’s been nothing but problems for me lately.
I see a very different takeaway from the video. All Premiere Pro users... Maybe now is the time to consider learning Resolve.
This Video is amazing Armando. The highest quality video on M1 I've ever seen. Keep it up and thank you for your hard work.
Wow. Really Great info. I really appreciate you throwing hardcore work at these. I am currently editing some old 8mm taped footage and wish I could throw these 2-hour Videos at an M1. Sadly Apple store won't let me play.
Love the video , so I still edit and shoot in 1080p I have a the 2020 27 inch 5k IMac with i9 10 core and wanted to be more mobile how do you think the M1 macbook would do compared to that one ?
Damn that was a lot of work and appreciated! Still waiting on my M1 and can't wait to run it against my 2016 touch bar lol!
I like your jib shots! They look soo dope!. Thanks for video
Great. For video editing higher end desktops and laptops will have the edge. But that’s expected. But something for you to keep in mind is that the dell drops when not plugged in which is a bummer.
I want to say that im the big Egyptian fan for you , i learned from you how i can make dramatic lighting in my videos ❤ thanks Armando
Its important to remember that resolve is a universal app not a native app. AKA its ment to run on both rather than like final cut that uses additional features/optimized routes for better performance. As of right now I wouldn't suggest an m1 to anyone who needs the fastest time unless they use Final cut. It is cool to know that resolve will get faster as time goes on.
8:50 because VRAM (GPU memory) is extremely limited compared to our RAM (CPU memory)
the newbie in me is like "... I uhh... film on an iPhone 12 Pro" or "how's iMovie werqin?", but thank you for this video! The tests are very interesting!
Optimized for M1 or not, Adobe's render times as still abysmal.
Amazing production Armando, i'm so surprised!!!
Amazing review and amazing video quality!
My 16gb m1 was brought to its knees with a fusion title in the timeline. Even my wife laughed that a line of text completely stopped playback.
Apple fanboys will never encounter these issues
Perfect! One of the best videos on the topic! :)
So much professionalism in 12:00 mins video.
Ahha I felt bad about the cute and tiny little M1 among the giants fighting it’s way out without a heart attack exporting 12 k videos in 6 hours
What did you use for these Elite camera movements? Looks WAAAAY too precise to just be gimbal operated... Or maybe you’re just that good 🔥
As always, great content! The real winner? BlackMagic DaVinci Resolve.
Good thing I use resolve LOL. My employer just ordered me a new M1 pro for video editing
really good video, solid, well explain and finally beautiful (bonitos) B-Rolls... Gracias Armando
Please can you do comparison of 16 inch M1 Max 32 Core, 64 GB Ram, 1 TB SSD with 14 inch M1 Pro 16 core, 1 TB SSD. Interested how they compare for video editing and how they respond to thermals and battery life.
I love your camera movements.
Interesting to see the comparison for the very pro user - something not many others have done. Maybe one day I’ll get to that level, but I’m such a noob when it comes to video and I’m just trying to figure out what I gain with Final Cut Pro vs sticking it out with iMovie 😂
Excelente hermano! As always!! My take on this video has nothing to do with the M1 although I can only imagine what apple has for the future. My take away is these 2 things: 1. That Mac Pro config is just In a league of its own that 22k investment it’s paying off and 2. Those geniuses at Puget System know what the heck they are doing with their builds, 5 years old and it’s still can play in the Mac Pro playground!!! The geeky tech in me rejoices!!!
This is about exporting, which of course you also can do in batch overnight, so speed isn't that important, more important is the overall editing workflow and exchange with other software such as protools. I also need to work with Premiere and Avid as a posproduction studio so M1 is no option.
I am thinking about an M1 Mac to replace my pc desktop. Do some basic video editing, of videos filmed in either 1080/ 4 k at 30 FPS, from a GoPro. Not withstanding the fact I upgraded the graphics on the pc to a Nividia RTX 2060.
Good lighting.
I'm not getting your use of the expression "followed by" in this video. Something "follows" that which leads; you consistently refer to a slower machines as being "followed by" a faster machine? Huh?