Bakul's Charging Order Hearing: What SHOULD Have Happened!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 เม.ย. 2024
- Get our FREE Peace Keepers and Court Auditor courses here at peacekeepers.org.uk/
FREE Council Tax dispute challenge download here noc.peacekeepers.org.uk/
"Peace Keepers have been created to help secure a just and equitable existence., coming together to defend the peoples peace, to restore and preserve our inalienable rights, the highest standing in truth to be sovereign."
Nothing can be done to the prejudice of the people.
(Bill of Rights 1688)
Law is the people’s birth right.
(Act of Settlement 1700)
All are equal under the law.
No one is above the law.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
No one can knowingly impose their will upon any other without freewill.
Everybody has lawful excuse to the right of self defence.
---------------------------------
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
Allowance is made for "fair use" purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Not wise even to treat children in a disrespectful way.
Well done chaps, your course, talks and videos have been immensely helpful. i am preparing documents to call a solicitor to account for not upholding a court order. I would never have felt able to do this without your teachings.
And thank you Mark
Great stuff!
Respect ❤
Is there a procedure to call the judge to account? I would imagine there is....I guess you'll have to wait for the transcript, of course.
That is an excellent question as we have similar problems elsewhere with judges not doing their job properly. However you have to balance the independence of the judiciary with their adherence to the rule of law, the only written document is the United Nations Bangalore principles which is referenced in UK legislation but not explicitly incorporated Into law particular reference to the impartiality of a judge. The case with magistrates is much worse because unless they have been rude or guilty of a Herty feelings crime then there is not much you can do about them even if they are corrupt and inclusion with the council behind the scene Such as has been discovered in a particular UK jurisdiction which is presently being investigated
Yes and you will able to watch it nearly real time over the next 3 to 6 months :)
@@marchorn466 I would love to see these judges sued for how they think they can get away with anything they wish, Marc is probably the one person who can get these thugs into a higher court and start make an example of them and reestablish law, order and fairness , we can't continue to let these Dominic thugs rule over us
Cornwall Council have made me bankrupt because of ct .they now want me to go for public examination hearing.shall i keep ignoring them?got on this a bit to late to learn the best solution. Cheers
Never ignore anything because it will be presumed you consent to whatever is being claimed. If you disagree with the claim being made you need to respond rebuking it and the reasons why. Ignoring it will guarantee the Council get whatever they claim 👍🏻
Yes your honor, I would like to be addressed as "Your Highness" 🤴
i announced myself after being asked how would you like to be called by district judge robert idris talog davies " a friend " he replied "no i cannot do that " !!!! at the end of the battle in his court .he replied to both parties " i hope there will be a amicable resolution,as we do not want to go to war " !!!
@@honda4004
"A friend"...good one 👍
Sad that we have such psychopathic systems that just can't show any incling of love and compassion. Keep trying tho bro 👍
Another good one, I’m sorry things didn’t work out, but Ive have the same issues over the last 7 years they don’t listen so definitely don’t apply their minds, or they say we’re not here to listen to a argument. I will keep going until my questions are answered, well done again and please don’t give up.
If you think judges treat people like that, then you obviously haven't been to court.
I have been in court where the judges refused to give their name let alone inform you of the proceedings and your rights. And i have been in court where the magistrates left the court on several occasions.
If a judge fails to identify , then just walk out, because it is not a court of law, its an administrative court.
That is what we are evidencing and are starting to hold them to account - all we want is that they do their jobs properly :)
Sue the Judge under R v Felixstowe 1987 and ask for punitive damages (The Judge pays a fine for breaking the law)
@@tcrookes2803 Correct - first we have his order overturned = proof of breach of duty and then have proof to sue :) One step at a time - that suffices as primae face evidence for criminal charges... it is a game of chess!!!
🤣 crying with laughter that Judge Cohen said he'd seen thousands of liability orders when we struggle just to get one!
I'm dying to use that quote when the councils send their templated replies quoting rule 115 of the Magistrates Court Rules that they don't have to produce one!
Please refer to Judge Cohen I will say to them, he's seen thousands of them.
Perhaps he drums them out on the printer in his office in the back garden! Crying with laughter really.
I got Bradford Magastrates admit on recording that the council hires a court room with there own private judges and there own private prosecutors how can you beat that
If this was true then you would be able to FOI the council and the court to get a copy of the hire bill but you can’t because it isn’t
I'm awake 14 years, I also remember when people started repeating this claim and calling magistrates courts. Like anything the more youvreoeat something the more it is considered a truth. Same thing has happened here. The court staff are just repeating what they have heard and are not reliable as first hand witness testimony.
Get it in writing.
You will never receive this.
I am about 13 days short of an FOI that will provide the evidence!
I have an FOI coming soon and will post a video on it!
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 Which dictionary are you relying on that says a person isn't a man? Does the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 & Disabled Persons Act 1981 only apply to businesses?
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 An event is registered. Just what that event is.....? Creation of the legal person perhaps.
👍
May we please have a copy of the Leighton judgement?
Many thanks to you all.
You can. Get it on Balii
@marchorn466 Tip to avoid there deflection tactics when trying to assert their paperwork submitted as evidence is fraudulent; ... simply object stating for the record - this evidence is unfounded and non justiciable.
did you not spot it in the video?
@@marchorn466 On my 2nd viewing, I`ve missed it. Time stamp? .. My point simply is to make sure that critical issues and evidential failings are entered into the record.
@@Non-corpus-juris Sorry just reread your comment. dealt with by the documents not being court documents and no one has signed a statement to believe the information is true which is required for a claim = court failure of due diligence... But yes point taken :)
@@marchorn466 Cheers and thanks for the feed back; you legal & lawful work is on par with a Master at common law ;)
Could Bakul object to the fact the Barrister didn’t rebut his claim that the paperwork was incorrect prior to judgment? Or object in another way to force the correct process prior to judgment? Hopefully avoiding the need to appeal?
We will be giving the court the opportunity to correct the mistakes of its officers...
Marc, what do you mean that Barristers dont deal with evidence?
Council as they have no first hand knowledge of the evidence cannot deal with evidence... They are a neutral party as their obligations are to the rule of law, and they are officers of the court, and under those obligations must put the court with all relevant law which by definition includes dissenting opinions which may undermine their clients case or assist your case...
By definition a barrister or solicitor can speak on information passed to them by a third party. That is defined as hearsay and hearsay cannot be admitted as evidence in any court.