Warriors sadly does not hold its own compared to the CV90. The CV90 is the gold standard of IFV design and there is a reason why Ukraine wants their own factory to build these. The Swedish 40mm is powerful enough to defeat tanks in the flank and with 3P programmable ammo each rou d has 6 modes of attack. We have all seen the video from Ukraine how it took 2 Bradleys to overcome 1 T90. Well, Russia sends in 2 T90s whenever Ukraine deploys 1 CV90
In the end it doesn't matter HOW advanced a vehicle is. If the crew and military commanders are not competent enough it blows up just as quick as a BMP. We have seen this over and over again in Ukraine with top modern weapons being used the wrong way.
BAE had NOTHING to do with CV90s developement. CV90 was developed in the late 80´s and introduced in the early 90´s, Alvis Vickers bought Hägglund in 94, after CV90 was introduced. BAE showed up in 2004.
@@mattblack9069 thats not what he said. He said:" In 1985 the STRV 90 was a project group made up of representatives of the swedish armed forces, the swedish defense administration and contractors, including Hägglund and Bofors. These Contractors would be behind the CV90 build in future iterations. Hägglung would become part of BAE Systems and the project groups search for a new IFV, they finalised the design for a new vehicle that came from an air force concept" Hägglund was only bought by Alvis Vickers AFTER the CV90 was finalised and production orders were given by the swedish MOD. This was in 1994. BAE came 10 years later.
3:55 The CV90 currently comes with five different gun options: + CV9030: 30 mm Bushmaster II autocannon + CV9035: 35 mm Bushmaster III autocannon + CV9040: 40 mm Bofors autocannon + CV90105: 105 mm rifled CN 105 C2 + CV90120: 120 mm smooth bore CTG 120 L50 Sweden is the only country that bought the CV9040 and those are the ones that were given to Ukraine. The CV9030 was developed for Norway and is also used by Finland and Switzerland. It may seem a bit strange to reduce the caliber of the gun but it means there's room for far more shells so it can keep firing for longer. The CV9040 can carry 232 rounds, the CV9030 about 600. The CV9035 was developed for the Netherlands who wanted something in between. It is also used by Denmark and Estonia. Nobody has bought the CV90120 yet and I don't think the CV90105 is in sevice anywhere either.
@@tessjuel they choose the 9040 because tests showed tjat was necessary to punch through the armour of a russian tank (side and rear) the new version we have bought now is the same as delivered to the dutch, the 9035 but the ammo is much betyer now then prwviously. Also they prioritized short delivery times and the 9035 is a of the shelf version.
Did my basic training 89-90 with those 5 cv90 prototypes running around - they where very impressive, and so quick even in low temperatures and over a meter thick snow in Boden - Sweden ... We had the Bv206 with two system - chasing them around ..
this vehicle in one of its latest iterations beats the hell out of anything we are monkeying around with. If we had half a brain we would buy them but we all know how dim MOD procurement are, i am reasonably sure it is cheaper than our stuff.
The system is build to be modular and upgradable, that was a main requirement when the specified the order for the vehicle. Not only makes the CV90 fill a lot of different roles like AA, mortar, antitank (with 120mm canon) etc, but also you can upgrade one module at the time
The 105 and 120mm cannons variants need special reinforcements, basically it's own chassi. Still if you want a gun-carrier for 120mm smoothbore, a CV90 is cheap, light and fast compared to most MBTs. There is also scout-variant with a binocular periscope on an extendable mast, there is a design for field-ambulance version, for a resupply-carrier version (ammocarrier) but I don't think they have prototypes of the last ones. The time when CV90 truly shines is IF (nobody did this yet) you have a corps with a few of the 120mm, a bunch of the 40mm a bunch of the mortar versions, a few scouts with a drone-operator squad in the back. All using the same platform, the same spare parts, the same controls. OPERATING that unit becomes so much easier for the logistics crew than if you got completely different platforms for everything. Hägglunds other tracked platform, Beowulf, got versions with radars, with AA guns/missiles and headquarters-wehicles. Combine with the Archer platform for artillery support and you got a complete corps. Wish they would make a new version of old "Bandkanon" so artillery could be tracked too. If Sweden had 100M population instead of 10M you would see this in full deployment, but as it is now, we got to small wallet to play.
Its rly accurate, was a gunner in one of those back in 2000. The sights back then was awesome, and i suspect its alot better now in the newer versions.
6:40 The CV90 is fitted with cameras and a screen for the guys in the back to be able to look around the vehicle before disembarking. I had the chance to get inside one of our Dutch CV90's and the troops were there to answer questions and explain things. They're really awesome high tech machines. The commanders station was also really impressive with a full battle management suite.
Brazil is NOT a CV90 operator. Bae systems has send a CV90 MkIV to brazil to test and evaluate. The system you are looking for is called Iron Fist Active Protection System (APS) Cool gadget is that the cv90 mkiv has a onboard drone that can be launch from the cv and looking for targets and send information to the cv90
Did my time in the Swedish army around -98 so these were pretty new then. Can't imagine how much has happened with them since then. Going from 40 to 30mm is a mistake though. The 40 is nasty.
The video doesn't mention, that all CV90s can engage aerial targets. Comparing this with CRV-T and Warrior is ridiculous. Their 30mm isn't even stabilished.
All CV90 can engage aerial target, but are not optimized for it. There is the LvKv version, that have a integrated air defence radar for it, and better elevation for the cannon. Of course it uses the same cannon, but considering the 40 mm is a AA gun, that just makes sense.
There is a version of the CV90 called Mjölner (which is the name for Thor's Hammer) and it is a Mortar system. Check that out! Usually they travel together with the other Mechanized infantry (hence other CV90 variants). Could be worth a look! ;-)
Sweden sent the 9040c to Ukraine. That is, the latest in-service variant, not some older they found in a shed. The C variant does not have the ATGM in the turret though.
C is not really the latest version as it's a variant not a version. C is the variant designed for international use with extra features like air conditioning for hot climates and extra protection against improvised explosives. All the of those basic variants A, B and C are in use in Sweden and getting upgrades to new versions like C1 and C2 etc. So when Swedish military say they sent the latest version so could that be any of A, B or C. But there were only ever 50 C variants made so it couldn't have been all C sent. It's possible that the latest batch sent to Ukraine were C though as Sweden is getting new ones to replace the C.
CV90 is a great system. The modularity is essential, it is a LEGO vehicle that can be assembled into a wide range of versions. Main battle tank? Mechanized infantry transport? Mobile heavy artillery squad? Or missile squad? CV90 can do it.
on all these vehicles with armor that protects against 16mm armor piercing from the side and super duper ammo from the front etc. But what happens to all these attached paraphernalia for radars, optics for lasers boxes for armored robots etc after just after a normal brrrrt with a machine gun?
A correction, the CV 90 was originally for 8 troops but later they changed it to 7 since the urge for more equipment storage was needed. There is also 2 hatches over the troop inside at the length of the seats so they can have them open and observe the terrain. They have also variants ( Lvkv 90A-D) with the 40 mm m/70Bb that is for the variant that can fight for example helicopters with programmable air burst ammunition. It has an attached radar. There are heaps of versions from SPAAG, SPM, EWF, ARV, FOV, FCV and much more.
3:11 No todays version have not 30 years old, the first version of CV90 is that old. todays CV90´s is much much younger and newer models. based from the same model and concept. that´s a big difference.
The MKIV version has a "minimal hull" profile making it among the hardest to detect by human means. It also has anti-sensor technology in electrical and mechanical sense. Its mobility is unmatched by any IFV out there. Its scaleable and task-related capabilities are also unmatched. Firepower Is anything from 30 to 120mm. Its fully stabilized fire under an advanced fire control system all-day capability. It shoots hole on hole even on the move. Its electronic architecture meets the latest demands and is actually ahead of the curve. Based on the active and passive offensive and defensive systems running on graphic processors to be able to present net-centric situation awareness in real-time. A system that utilizes machine learning and AI. Add to that a drive train and active suspension making it. as the market known it as, the best IFV on the market and a friend to the mech. soldiers. Ajax is a new system that, with its prerequisite does not have the capabilities the CV90 have. Why did the UK go for General Dynamics prospect when they could have had the Swedish-developed SEP - a system based on the CV 90 but on steroids. As the UK defence ministry said then -"It's a too complicated system". It had hub engines, or a hybrid drive on more than one engine and anything the CV90 had. All easy to upgrade. It was so modular that you could reconfigure a wheeled vehicle to a tracked one. And the track record of Högglunds is spotless when it comes to product development, delivery and quality. My opinion is that the UK would have got a better deal going with the CV90 derivative.
CV90 also fits nicely on train wagon. Not all IFVs do. If you can't get the vehicle to the combat zone in time it does not matter how stellar the specs are.
The CV90 is far more mobile then the warrior. Less ground pressure from what I understand. So it can operate on ground that tanks just can't operate on, flanking them.
And was with any country, recent military progression is classified. so we don't know the current progress of any application or development of military equipment.
We are damn proud about our stuff. We have lots of stuff that is not public. They are surprise surprise like we call it. Since we are so few people on such a big surface we have arranged our military for it. Surprise surprise intruder. 👊
How does the active protection adapt to friendly soldiers nearby the vehicle? Or it does not take this into account? Like they are unlucky and the ones in the vehicle are lucky
Britain should have bought the CV-90 years ago, Which is developed by BAE . Instead of wasting millions on the Ajax ,who's developed has been a nightmare! Unfortunately, politics always takes president over what's actually best for our armed forces!
Having CV90 compared to AJAX is laughable at best. CV90 is world leading in mobility where the AJAX had issues backing up over 12 inch vertical at one point. CV90 Mk4 has adaptive suspension which means that it will adjust suspension to the conditions. All the troops in the CV90 have full situational awareness with monitors inside the compartment.
Its a another version in test progress. CV90 gonna change camoflage colour automatic depending on wheather and temp. In green alps green camo...over the top to snow alps getting white camo.
@@CombatReadyHQ its more like...u dont have to use colored camo net. Same CV90 could be use in desert as in wintersnow landscapes. No repaint. And adjust with ours in day. In nigth camo is black. And so on.
Just to be clear when you asked about anti air capabilities. Cv 90 are meant to act as part of the mechanazied battalions which consists of ceveral variants of the cv 90 and that includes a version that handles air threats. They fight worh our version of leopars tanks and they include other thing like mortars (built on cv 90), artilley (archers) and so on… cv 90 is NOT meant to fight without all parts in a mechanized battalion… You have a good video here showing how the battalion is equipted and will fight th-cam.com/video/JqrWo9-8bxI/w-d-xo.html&si=pYeSobBEL1BAyxWF
Glad they have good cameras obviously the Russians old tanks don’t they drive over every mine laid on top ground ! I don’t understand why they don’t just stick 360insta cams on top for drivers
The only issue is motor get heat up when using it several hours driving. Cooling system must be better. U cant start cv90 when its overheated. Exept that its the best INFW
Just started watching your video lately. You really need to research your facts a little. You stated the CV90 weights the same as a CVR(t). A CVR(t) weights a maximum of 10 tonnes. So you’re only 27 tonnes out.
I think you can ride the CV90 with an open hatch at the back and the soldiers provide cover for the CV90 and will also have situation awareness just before they dismount.
It would be nice if you could provide some reactions of those "shocked". Thank you. If it was only you being shocked I'll consider your title simple as click bait.
Tanks are being made redundant by drones in Ukraine. They are extremely expensive to build compared to drones. So the only way this tank can be of use today is if it has anti drone technology built in, which it does have to some degree. Be very interesting to see it perform in Ukraine.
you watched not the best and not the newest video, even if 3 months ago my guy... there are already much better out there, menntioning that UA got the CV9040C version, etc... and yes, even that version proved being the best IFV on the front ( take it like an info from the "3rd hand" as I am "here" and have frendos out there using them plus having a frend from Sweden serving on one of them aswell. )
Misleading Metadata or Thumbnails: Using the title, thumbnails, description to trick users into believing the content is something it is not. It did not shock the World.
I really don't like the "shocked the world" bs (I'm not shitting on you, just the creator of the original vid). But I suppose it's easier to put in a headline compared to "It was introduced and has seen upgrades that has made it more capable over time and has earned respect by several countries over decades of use".
Before the advent of drones either dropping grenades or kamikazing you, the CV90 was also used for mounted combat. The back of the vehicle has two hatches from which the soldiers can stand up and shoot from. Check out Skruffy Talez, a swesdish dude, with many videos about swedish armament and weapons, particularly with regard to Ukraine: www.youtube.com/@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone
It's good that Sweden joined NATO so late. Thanks to this, it is one of the few countries in the area that has not dismantled its arms industry.
Warriors sadly does not hold its own compared to the CV90. The CV90 is the gold standard of IFV design and there is a reason why Ukraine wants their own factory to build these. The Swedish 40mm is powerful enough to defeat tanks in the flank and with 3P programmable ammo each rou d has 6 modes of attack.
We have all seen the video from Ukraine how it took 2 Bradleys to overcome 1 T90. Well, Russia sends in 2 T90s whenever Ukraine deploys 1 CV90
All I know is that it makes me happy to be Swedish.
Finally some tax money put to good use.
REAL!
In the end it doesn't matter HOW advanced a vehicle is. If the crew and military commanders are not competent enough it blows up just as quick as a BMP. We have seen this over and over again in Ukraine with top modern weapons being used the wrong way.
CV-90 hast been at all successful in Ukraine. Every encounter it has been defeated either by simple RPG, FPV or artillery.
@@MS-wz9jm 🤣🤣🤣
Without doubt the best IFV in the world. CV,90 also has a AA, Mortar and AT variant.
Just amazing 😮
BAE had NOTHING to do with CV90s developement.
CV90 was developed in the late 80´s and introduced in the early 90´s, Alvis Vickers bought Hägglund in 94, after CV90 was introduced.
BAE showed up in 2004.
Have another listen, he said the consortium was later joined by BAE and became part of BAE systems.
@@mattblack9069 thats not what he said.
He said:" In 1985 the STRV 90 was a project group made up of representatives of the swedish armed forces, the swedish defense administration and contractors, including Hägglund and Bofors.
These Contractors would be behind the CV90 build in future iterations.
Hägglung would become part of BAE Systems and the project groups search for a new IFV, they finalised the design for a new vehicle that came from an air force concept"
Hägglund was only bought by Alvis Vickers AFTER the CV90 was finalised and production orders were given by the swedish MOD. This was in 1994. BAE came 10 years later.
@@zhufortheimpaler4041 Exactly, they became part of later.
Love the imfo my man 😎
Doesn't matter. We are ONE
3:55 The CV90 currently comes with five different gun options:
+ CV9030: 30 mm Bushmaster II autocannon
+ CV9035: 35 mm Bushmaster III autocannon
+ CV9040: 40 mm Bofors autocannon
+ CV90105: 105 mm rifled CN 105 C2
+ CV90120: 120 mm smooth bore CTG 120 L50
Sweden is the only country that bought the CV9040 and those are the ones that were given to Ukraine.
The CV9030 was developed for Norway and is also used by Finland and Switzerland. It may seem a bit strange to reduce the caliber of the gun but it means there's room for far more shells so it can keep firing for longer. The CV9040 can carry 232 rounds, the CV9030 about 600.
The CV9035 was developed for the Netherlands who wanted something in between. It is also used by Denmark and Estonia.
Nobody has bought the CV90120 yet and I don't think the CV90105 is in sevice anywhere either.
@@tessjuel they choose the 9040 because tests showed tjat was necessary to punch through the armour of a russian tank (side and rear) the new version we have bought now is the same as delivered to the dutch, the 9035 but the ammo is much betyer now then prwviously. Also they prioritized short delivery times and the 9035 is a of the shelf version.
Did my basic training 89-90 with those 5 cv90 prototypes running around - they where very impressive, and so quick even in low temperatures and over a meter thick snow in Boden - Sweden ... We had the Bv206 with two system - chasing them around ..
That was supposed to be a Tow2 system we chased the Cv90 with - spell check got me
I drove one in 2005-2006 IIRC in Boden. Best vehicle i have ever driven. It can go anywhere adn never get stuck.
this vehicle in one of its latest iterations beats the hell out of anything we are monkeying around with. If we had half a brain we would buy them but we all know how dim MOD procurement are, i am reasonably sure it is cheaper than our stuff.
The system is build to be modular and upgradable, that was a main requirement when the specified the order for the vehicle. Not only makes the CV90 fill a lot of different roles like AA, mortar, antitank (with 120mm canon) etc, but also you can upgrade one module at the time
The 105 and 120mm cannons variants need special reinforcements, basically it's own chassi. Still if you want a gun-carrier for 120mm smoothbore, a CV90 is cheap, light and fast compared to most MBTs. There is also scout-variant with a binocular periscope on an extendable mast, there is a design for field-ambulance version, for a resupply-carrier version (ammocarrier) but I don't think they have prototypes of the last ones. The time when CV90 truly shines is IF (nobody did this yet) you have a corps with a few of the 120mm, a bunch of the 40mm a bunch of the mortar versions, a few scouts with a drone-operator squad in the back. All using the same platform, the same spare parts, the same controls. OPERATING that unit becomes so much easier for the logistics crew than if you got completely different platforms for everything. Hägglunds other tracked platform, Beowulf, got versions with radars, with AA guns/missiles and headquarters-wehicles. Combine with the Archer platform for artillery support and you got a complete corps. Wish they would make a new version of old "Bandkanon" so artillery could be tracked too. If Sweden had 100M population instead of 10M you would see this in full deployment, but as it is now, we got to small wallet to play.
Its rly accurate, was a gunner in one of those back in 2000. The sights back then was awesome, and i suspect its alot better now in the newer versions.
6:40 The CV90 is fitted with cameras and a screen for the guys in the back to be able to look around the vehicle before disembarking. I had the chance to get inside one of our Dutch CV90's and the troops were there to answer questions and explain things. They're really awesome high tech machines. The commanders station was also really impressive with a full battle management suite.
There's an old video here on YT called "CV90 Mobility" where the Norwegian military compares the CV90 to the Bradley.
Next up, react to the "T Ghost - Invisible Tank". It's a prototype based on the CV90. It's pretty nifty. Can't wait to see your reaction 😉
+1 on that request!
You can see the CV 90 120 T Ghost, in few seconds this video.
Later this year I will start training with different versions of this vehicle ❤
Brazil is NOT a CV90 operator. Bae systems has send a CV90 MkIV to brazil to test and evaluate.
The system you are looking for is called Iron Fist Active Protection System (APS)
Cool gadget is that the cv90 mkiv has a onboard drone that can be launch from the cv and looking for targets and send information to the cv90
You didn't mention the best part: Reliability despite the conditions. It will never let you down.
Did my time in the Swedish army around -98 so these were pretty new then. Can't imagine how much has happened with them since then. Going from 40 to 30mm is a mistake though. The 40 is nasty.
Dude!! you need to check out CV90 Ghost!
Crazy Brits aren't using this
The video doesn't mention, that all CV90s can engage aerial targets.
Comparing this with CRV-T and Warrior is ridiculous. Their 30mm isn't even stabilished.
All CV90 can engage aerial target, but are not optimized for it. There is the LvKv version, that have a integrated air defence radar for it, and better elevation for the cannon. Of course it uses the same cannon, but considering the 40 mm is a AA gun, that just makes sense.
There is a version of the CV90 called Mjölner (which is the name for Thor's Hammer) and it is a Mortar system. Check that out! Usually they travel together with the other Mechanized infantry (hence other CV90 variants). Could be worth a look! ;-)
Sweden sent the 9040c to Ukraine. That is, the latest in-service variant, not some older they found in a shed. The C variant does not have the ATGM in the turret though.
C is not really the latest version as it's a variant not a version. C is the variant designed for international use with extra features like air conditioning for hot climates and extra protection against improvised explosives. All the of those basic variants A, B and C are in use in Sweden and getting upgrades to new versions like C1 and C2 etc. So when Swedish military say they sent the latest version so could that be any of A, B or C. But there were only ever 50 C variants made so it couldn't have been all C sent.
It's possible that the latest batch sent to Ukraine were C though as Sweden is getting new ones to replace the C.
CV90 is a great system. The modularity is essential, it is a LEGO vehicle that can be assembled into a wide range of versions.
Main battle tank? Mechanized infantry transport? Mobile heavy artillery squad? Or missile squad? CV90 can do it.
on all these vehicles with armor that protects against 16mm armor piercing from the side and super duper ammo from the front etc. But what happens to all these attached paraphernalia for radars, optics for lasers boxes for armored robots etc after just after a normal brrrrt with a machine gun?
A correction, the CV 90 was originally for 8 troops but later they changed it to 7 since the urge for more equipment storage was needed. There is also 2 hatches over the troop inside at the length of the seats so they can have them open and observe the terrain.
They have also variants ( Lvkv 90A-D) with the 40 mm m/70Bb that is for the variant that can fight for example helicopters with programmable air burst ammunition. It has an attached radar. There are heaps of versions from SPAAG, SPM, EWF, ARV, FOV, FCV and much more.
3:11 No todays version have not 30 years old, the first version of CV90 is that old. todays CV90´s is much much younger and newer models. based from the same model and concept. that´s a big difference.
Yes they’ve made huge improvements to it over the 30 years
"Thats...nice" 😂❤ (warmachine doing doughnuts while pointing cannon at you)
The MKIV version has a "minimal hull" profile making it among the hardest to detect by human means. It also has anti-sensor technology in electrical and mechanical sense. Its mobility is unmatched by any IFV out there. Its scaleable and task-related capabilities are also unmatched. Firepower Is anything from 30 to 120mm. Its fully stabilized fire under an advanced fire control system all-day capability. It shoots hole on hole even on the move. Its electronic architecture meets the latest demands and is actually ahead of the curve. Based on the active and passive offensive and defensive systems running on graphic processors to be able to present net-centric situation awareness in real-time. A system that utilizes machine learning and AI. Add to that a drive train and active suspension making it. as the market known it as, the best IFV on the market and a friend to the mech. soldiers. Ajax is a new system that, with its prerequisite does not have the capabilities the CV90 have. Why did the UK go for General Dynamics prospect when they could have had the Swedish-developed SEP - a system based on the CV 90 but on steroids. As the UK defence ministry said then -"It's a too complicated system". It had hub engines, or a hybrid drive on more than one engine and anything the CV90 had. All easy to upgrade. It was so modular that you could reconfigure a wheeled vehicle to a tracked one. And the track record of Högglunds is spotless when it comes to product development, delivery and quality. My opinion is that the UK would have got a better deal going with the CV90 derivative.
CV90 also fits nicely on train wagon. Not all IFVs do. If you can't get the vehicle to the combat zone in time it does not matter how stellar the specs are.
Lynx KF41 ?
The CV90 is far more mobile then the warrior.
Less ground pressure from what I understand.
So it can operate on ground that tanks just can't operate on, flanking them.
The CV90,s greatest strength is its reliability.Awesome Combat vehicle.
And was with any country, recent military progression is classified. so we don't know the current progress of any application or development of military equipment.
every thing seems to shock the world on youtube
😂😂😂😂
We are damn proud about our stuff. We have lots of stuff that is not public. They are surprise surprise like we call it. Since we are so few people on such a big surface we have arranged our military for it. Surprise surprise intruder. 👊
How does the active protection adapt to friendly soldiers nearby the vehicle?
Or it does not take this into account? Like they are unlucky and the ones in the vehicle are lucky
What I love about this PLATFORM is how versatile and customizable it is. It's like configuring your new car or PC.
I love all swedish made weapons, so well designed, thought Tru and simple looking sexy shit 😂
Britain should have bought the CV-90 years ago, Which is developed by BAE . Instead of wasting millions on the Ajax ,who's developed has been a nightmare! Unfortunately, politics always takes president over what's actually best for our armed forces!
Having CV90 compared to AJAX is laughable at best. CV90 is world leading in mobility where the AJAX had issues backing up over 12 inch vertical at one point. CV90 Mk4 has adaptive suspension which means that it will adjust suspension to the conditions. All the troops in the CV90 have full situational awareness with monitors inside the compartment.
Its a another version in test progress. CV90 gonna change camoflage colour automatic depending on wheather and temp. In green alps green camo...over the top to snow alps getting white camo.
That’s a great idea especially with the terrain and environment in that area of the Sweden, Denmark and Norway
@@CombatReadyHQ its more like...u dont have to use colored camo net. Same CV90 could be use in desert as in wintersnow landscapes. No repaint. And adjust with ours in day. In nigth camo is black. And so on.
We produce quality over quantity.
The canon versions are 25, 30, 40 and 120mm if not misstaken.
But everything other than the original 40 mm is heresy, and should not be accepted.
The turret is placed off centre of the chassis, because that the power pack is slightly to the right.
They counter balance each other.
Uk should by cv90 instead of the junk uk have
Greetings from Sweden 💪✌️
Maybe have a look at the experimental version called "Ghost". It's quite fun. And the "Barracuda" camouflage system.
the platform is 40 years old - the old IED protection sucked badly...they need something new
the misile can look on to heli also but not planes
Just to be clear when you asked about anti air capabilities. Cv 90 are meant to act as part of the mechanazied battalions which consists of ceveral variants of the cv 90 and that includes a version that handles air threats. They fight worh our version of leopars tanks and they include other thing like mortars (built on cv 90), artilley (archers) and so on… cv 90 is NOT meant to fight without all parts in a mechanized battalion… You have a good video here showing how the battalion is equipted and will fight th-cam.com/video/JqrWo9-8bxI/w-d-xo.html&si=pYeSobBEL1BAyxWF
Vikings are woken.. cells everywhere
Glad they have good cameras obviously the Russians old tanks don’t they drive over every mine laid on top ground ! I don’t understand why they don’t just stick 360insta cams on top for drivers
The only issue is motor get heat up when using it several hours driving. Cooling system must be better. U cant start cv90 when its overheated. Exept that its the best INFW
It must be fixed with the new version right? It has a new Engine etc..
@@Gurupimp10 yea
Been a driver for years in Swedish army and we never had this problem on our CV90s.
It has a Scania engine and they are very reliable.
@@petter5721 its big dif driving in sweden few ours in week for som training verses in real warfare driving in ukraine. So..👍
They all burn.
Should scrap AJAX and buy CV90
Just started watching your video lately. You really need to research your facts a little. You stated the CV90 weights the same as a CVR(t). A CVR(t) weights a maximum of 10 tonnes. So you’re only 27 tonnes out.
I think you can ride the CV90 with an open hatch at the back and the soldiers provide cover for the CV90 and will also have situation awareness just before they dismount.
It would be nice if you could provide some reactions of those "shocked". Thank you.
If it was only you being shocked I'll consider your title simple as click bait.
Vovchansk there is a reason. why ukraine rolled in and took it )
Swedisch steeel ⚔
Swedish armsindustry are top notch
Tanks are being made redundant by drones in Ukraine. They are extremely expensive to build compared to drones. So the only way this tank can be of use today is if it has anti drone technology built in, which it does have to some degree. Be very interesting to see it perform in Ukraine.
CV90 is what you brits should have invested in, instead of the Ajax money pit..🧐😉
you watched not the best and not the newest video, even if 3 months ago my guy...
there are already much better out there, menntioning that UA got the CV9040C version, etc... and yes, even that version proved being the best IFV on the front ( take it like an info from the "3rd hand" as I am "here" and have frendos out there using them plus having a frend from Sweden serving on one of them aswell. )
CV 90 is made and designed in Sweden! Not British.
I know this thing is pretty powerful in War Thunder 😁😁😁
Those are AT not AA
Yes I saw, thank you 🙏👍
@@CombatReadyHQ I wrote that before watching the whole video, shame on me :D
AJAX 🤣
haha, all purpose cleaner :)
english.. speak to me?
Misleading Metadata or Thumbnails: Using the title, thumbnails, description to trick users into believing the content is something it is not.
It did not shock the World.
I really don't like the "shocked the world" bs (I'm not shitting on you, just the creator of the original vid). But I suppose it's easier to put in a headline compared to "It was introduced and has seen upgrades that has made it more capable over time and has earned respect by several countries over decades of use".
Very plain...im not shocked.
nothing a £99 drone made in China couldn't stop in its tracks
Duh... asymmetrical warfare is nothing new.
CV90 is one old ass vehicle.
Before the advent of drones either dropping grenades or kamikazing you, the CV90 was also used for mounted combat. The back of the vehicle has two hatches from which the soldiers can stand up and shoot from. Check out Skruffy Talez, a swesdish dude, with many videos about swedish armament and weapons, particularly with regard to Ukraine: www.youtube.com/@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone
Lynx KF41 vs CV 90MK4 ?
stop reacting
Why??