i beg to differ they failed miserably in their counter offensive in their own land -- SUPPORTED BY 50 military powers of the world they have failed to liberate even one kilometer of land annExed by Russia ---- OVERRATED
oh Swedish mechanics are there together with communications specialist and all other types of military. Those communications specialist are the ones that got 2x Iskandar missile on their heads in Poltava military school. News agencies were pretending it was women and children getting hit (and that most likely could have happened but they were not the target).
Denmark just placed an order for 115 CV9035 MK IIIC and together with Sweden is financing production of new CV90 of the same model for Ukraine. It has ATGM missiles to fight even MBT's at long distances.
@@NotUnymous Not sure who is paying for what but I've read that 230 CV9035 Mk IIIC will be built for Ukraine, 50 in Sweden and 180 in The Netherlands. The NL production line is still under construction so it might take a while to get started but when it is up and running it will be possible to produce them much faster.
@@bjornSE Production times are about te same in both facilities, but the one in Örnsköldsvik is already occupied to a large extent with the order from Czechia and Slovakia.
@@NotUnymousenviron 230 véhicules de la configuration CV9035 MKIII. En plus de ses ifv's, l'Ukraine a signé un contrat avec BEA system pour produire sur son territoire environ 1000 véhicules de ce type (même configuration que mentionné plus haut) afin de remplacer l'ensemble de la flotte de BMP. Les usines qui produiront ses véhicules en Ukraine sont supposé être ouvertes d'ici 2025. En plus des CV, l'Ukraine va également produire sur son territoire des KF41 Lynx en partenariat avec Rheinmetall afin de remplacer complètement les marders reçu et créer une flotte plus importante. Le premier véhicule de se type est supposé sortir des usines d'ici Décembre de cette année, selon le PDG de Rheinmetall lui-même.
As a South African...I'm proud to see the world and countrys coming together to support Ukraine...may God bless every country that sent help and thank you to all for sending ....Slava 💪
My impartial opinion is the CV90 is he best, purely because it's a very recent design which includes far more modern elements has a better main weapon, but to say the Bradley was being designed as far back as the 1960s it's a fantastic vehicle. Part of its brilliance is in its versatility and ease of adding modern weapons, targeting systems and armour tylored for specific missions. It's like the F16of the ground.
If the Ukrainian military had all the tech that the US military had the war would have been over a long time ago. They adapt and overcome. They have to learn so many different types of weapons systems so fast as their life depends on it. If your country was invaded you would want all and any weapons too. Ukraine needs all the support. Money is money it's printed. Lives cannot be printed.
Money is in fact not just printable. Ever wonder why you spend 100$+ on groceries per person each week? Governments cannot just print money without increasing economic output, otherwise you are just going into deficit and causing massive inflation
That clip about the Marders is at least a year old, since Ukraine's received 140 of them by now. The fact that we've barely seen them or the CV90's is a sign that Ukraine is keeping its best IFV's safe for when offensive and counteroffensive opportunities present themselves, like in Kursk.
There has not been much mobile warfare since last year. Those are usefull in raids like kursk... but if they are used for trench warfare, they will be stationary primary targets. Lets hope Ukraine will do some more actions like in the north. in the east they need modern artillerie and digging tools.
The 120 is good but its a tank as it loses the infantry carrying capacity. The beauty of the CV90 series is the modularity and how it can be so many different things, but I think the CV90 MK IV with the 35 mm would be more appropriate and useful in more situations. Wouldn't mind them having both types, but given limited resources I would focus the IFVs as IFVs and tanks as tanks and have Leopard 2s and Abrams on one side and CV90s and Bradleys on the other.
I have to agree with@@AlexAnteroLammikko . 8 out of 10 times an IFV is the better tool for the job. And in the remaining 20% of cases you‘re way better off using a proper MBT. There are uses for vehicles like the CV90120, but they are limited to the situations in which an IFV is insufficient but a proper MBT isn’t available. With proper planning this is typically either the case in very small militaries that cannot justify a separate tank platform or in expeditionary forces that cannot justify the logistics footprint of a proper MBT. Neither is applicable to Ukraine‘s situation. Thus it’s better to spend the available resources on MBTs and IFVs.
@@RichelieuUnlimited arguably having a low cost fire support platform with the same supply train as your IFV's you can get more vehicles on the same budget with less support personnel. Yet to see anyone bet real money that it will work though.
There is only a few prototypes and no one have them on order Ukrain won't see any of them, but they should get som cv90lvkv to help counter drones and heli.
I have been following this since Sweden and the Netherlands gifted all of those CV90s to Ukraine. What’s certain is that Ukraine has kept the CV90 in more of a supporting role, for medivacs and similar tasks. Meanwhile, the Bradley has been sent on numerous missions and used more regularly. The CV90 has been involved in some missions, but nothing compared to the Bradley. Originally Ukraine only got 50 cv90’s so it makes sense for them to use them more carefully. 🇸🇪🦅🇺🇦
Imagine how many people who have lost their lives in this war. And still the Politicians talk the same B Sh*t instead of actually doing something. Scale up the production and let Ukraine point out what they need and then give it to them.
good timing because the US had a LOT of Bradleys and didn't need them anymore. As much as this whole drama can be "good" in any way. Weras the german army was tragically underfunded and underequpipped for decades.
During the cold war the west-german Bundeswehr owned more than 2,000 Marders, today most of them are sold all over the world or scrapped. 120 Marder were delivered to Ukraine so far, but there are probably not much left in the stocks.
the Bundeswehr wasnt/isnt underfunded/underequipped, as we know now for certain the russian army was/is a paper tiger which couldnt compete with NATO forces on any level ... Ukraine had only a small fraction of what NATO has and still gets only a tiny fraction of what NATO spends on its own forces, yet it still manages to fight the russian army with favorable odds/casualty ratios and now even went to invade russia itself after years of conflict. So stop this nonsense of NATO/Germany being underfunded / underequipped, this never was the case since the end of the cold war. This new arms race among NATO members is a fearmongering scam just serving the arms industry and absolutely goes beyond what anyone would need to secure NATO. You have to be really terrible at math to look at the numbers and claim that NATO hasnt enough / wouldnt invest enough in its military. If we were smart we wouldnt have to increase our own military spending at all, simply directing a portion of that spending directly to Ukraine (rather then only giving the old stuff we replace) would fully cover what is needed to defeat russia and that investment would still be far less then what we spend right now.
The Marder were also already in the phase out at the Bundeswehr. It is also being phased out in other armies, where they are replaced by Lynx, Puma or CV90. The Bradley is still in use in the US though and the replacement project is still in the early development stage. Btw, the Marder was already due to being replaced in the 1990s with a planned Marder 2 heavy IFV. That was then cancelled after the cold war ended. So it is that old, but still much better than the Russian crap.
The best thing about the Bradley is not only that its a good vehicle, but its available in big numbers. the Marder is also good and well armored for an older IFV but sadly will never be supplied in big numbers. The CV90 is amazing, but also lacks in numbers sadly.
A lot of brilliant mechanical engineers I graduated with at the University of California at Davis went to work for FMC: the Farm Machinery Corooration who designed and built the Bradley Fighting Vehicle.
Le CV90 est vraiment super !C'est dommage que aucun CV90 105 et 120 on été envoyer ainsi que la version obusier de 155mm. Mais c'est déjà super et c'est un des meilleurs IFV. Dommage que l'on a très peut de vidéo de se véhicule au combat.
No gun-version of the CV90 was ever put into production. The lack of videos and footage is due to the Ukrainians honouring the direct request to not show off Swedish materiel in use.
They are definitely propping the Bradley up a bit, but the results speak for themselves. We don't see turrets flying into orbit and the crews survive everytime they lose one of these.
My heart goes out to anyone involved in that conflict. Russian, Ukrainian, anyone. I don’t want this to turn out to be a wider conflict, and I certainly would like this conflict to stop period, but sadly I think we are mere months away from it.
Of the 3 Western IFV's, in the configurations Ukraine currently has, the M2A2SA+BRAT is the best followed by Marder. If the CV90 were basically anything other than the 40mm variant they have, it'd be the best but having to reload every ~21 rounds is just a pain in the ass...
I disagree with the criticism regarding the 40mm cannon’s limited rounds. While it may have fewer rounds loaded, I’d much rather have a weapon that packs a punch than one that merely irritates the enemy. Take the Puma, for example. It's an impressive machine, but its 30mm cannon, though capable, won’t do much more than temporarily obscure the enemy’s vision. it won’t deliver a knockout blow. Both vehicles are effective, but they serve different purposes based on their armament. Moreover, I’m pleased that Ukraine received the CV9040C. It’s one of the few early 2000s variants that boasts excellent protection and armor, with added mine protection and robust frontal and side defenses. Ultimately, debating which vehicle is superior is akin to arguing which caliber is better. 5.56mm or 7.62mm. Both have their merits, depending on the context and the mission requirements. 🇸🇪🦅🇺🇦
Evan, how big guns do boars in Ukraine usually have...? Don't be silly Pvt. Conskriptovich, boars doesn't have guns... *Bofors 40/L70: BOOMBOOMBOOMBOOM!cllingclangkaclang!* ...Evan... i... do not thin.. that.. was a.. boahhhrghhhh...💀
*Первый сюжет было очень волнительно, когда бойцов ВСУ зажали в окопе. И как радостно было видеть как к ним спешит на помощь Бредли и прикрывает их огнем. Слава Украине! С уважением из Казахстана*
To say that the Bradley was “truly battle proven” by Ukrainians is a stretch. Bradleys destroyed more vehicles in Desert Storm than any other armored vehicle. More than Abrams, Challengers, Warriors, AMX-30s, etc. The Bradleys then were less advance than the ones Ukraine was given. No piece of American tech given to Ukraine needed to be “tested and proven” by Ukrainians.
It is true - but same time not true. As one man said that the fight of the Coalition against the Iraq Army was a fight of a proffessionel heavy weight boxer against a 12 year old bully. It is proven that in desert storm more US soldiers died trough friendly fire. So actually it is true that the real test is right now Ukraine - because the Russian have equipment that is sometimes UP to Date. So now the Bradley truly had to show his worth and it looks like he is doing fine.
The Bradley and Abrams are Cold War era vehicles meant to fight the Soviets in a European war. This is that European war, with the piss-poor descendants of the soviets. Kinda makes sense that the desert wars/coin conflicts aren't the right area to prove a vehicle not meant for that environment or conflict. However it is well proven in the combat it has seen under the American flag, as you noted. Just leaving this "both sides ya'll" here
To be honest and fair. The US fought an enemy wich wasnt even near the technology of the US The Iraqi neither had Night Vision, drone scouting or even automated turrets. You cant really compare this
Europe must creat the EAF..European Armed Forces,and uniformize(if it's even a word..) the equipment and machinery..Europeans,Europe is al we've got..let's keepit ours and strong.
Americans spent approximately $300 MILLION PER DAY during its military involvement in Afghanistan over a span of about 20 years. This figure is derived from estimates that total U.S. spending in Afghanistan exceeded $2 trillion by the time of the withdrawal in 2021. This means that the West does not want Ukraine to win...
Hi. Any reports on problems with these western IFV, do not think every thing is "happy days and red roses"!. Some rumours actually say that there is equipment out there that is crap and the UA forces only use it for transport duties. Brgds and keep on the hard work.
There are no lack of videos of Bradleys in combat but almost zero footage of cv90 or marder. Did the swedes and germans prohibit combat footage of those platforms?
He was nt selling tanks they are armoured personnel carriers that have had all weapons taken off including smoke discharges. If you had done your due diligence you would know that.
Man muss sich fragen, warum die Bradleybesatzung die Panzerbesatzung, nachdem der Kampfpanzer unbrauchbar geschossen war, nicht mit dem MG bekämpft hat? Es sollten ja auch Infanteristen an Bord sein, die das übernehmen solten.
It’s an excellent avf but they are still slowly losing ground unfortunately. I think that the war will end by negotiation and Ukraine losing the Russian speaking part of Ukraine to Russia. Just being honest.
There's one caveat here: there are insofar lots of publicised M1A2 Bradely battlefield videos, one Marder video from Kursk Oblast and none of the CV9040. Of course that is what I have watched and can recollect off the top of my head, but that is in pretty good comformity with reality. I wonder if the CV9040 is not seen performing missions on the battlefield due to logistical issues or some political constraints.
No, the CV90 hasn’t seen as much combat action as the Bradley. While it has been involved in some missions, it hasn’t been deployed as frequently. The reason Ukraine has chosen this approach is likely due to the CV90's greater value and more advanced technology. They are preserving these vehicles for strategic purposes. Additionally, it’s important to remember that Ukraine initially received only 50 CV90s, so their limited numbers make them even more valuable. In contrast, the Bradley has been available in greater numbers, which may explain why it’s seen more extensive use in combat.
![Counteroffensive operation of Azov recon. Mission to liberate the forests of Luhansk region [+ENG]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A03NSa-zJYU/mqdefault.jpg)
A good tool can fix anything but not without a good mechanic. Those Ukrainian soldiers have talent. Got my respect.
i beg to differ -- NATO is in control
Yes. Respect. Good people to have on your side.
i beg to differ they failed miserably in their counter offensive in their own land -- SUPPORTED BY 50 military powers of the world they have failed to liberate even one kilometer of land annExed by Russia ---- OVERRATED
oh Swedish mechanics are there together with communications specialist and all other types of military. Those communications specialist are the ones that got 2x Iskandar missile on their heads in Poltava military school. News agencies were pretending it was women and children getting hit (and that most likely could have happened but they were not the target).
Was not the whole Idea of an M-4 Sherman to be a Tank that a country boy can fire drive and fix?
Denmark just placed an order for 115 CV9035 MK IIIC and together with Sweden is financing production of new CV90 of the same model for Ukraine. It has ATGM missiles to fight even MBT's at long distances.
Great News! Do you know how many CV90s Sweden and Denmark are gifting to Ukraine?
@@NotUnymous Not sure who is paying for what but I've read that 230 CV9035 Mk IIIC will be built for Ukraine, 50 in Sweden and 180 in The Netherlands. The NL production line is still under construction so it might take a while to get started but when it is up and running it will be possible to produce them much faster.
@@bjornSE Production times are about te same in both facilities, but the one in Örnsköldsvik is already occupied to a large extent with the order from Czechia and Slovakia.
@@NotUnymousenviron 230 véhicules de la configuration CV9035 MKIII. En plus de ses ifv's, l'Ukraine a signé un contrat avec BEA system pour produire sur son territoire environ 1000 véhicules de ce type (même configuration que mentionné plus haut) afin de remplacer l'ensemble de la flotte de BMP. Les usines qui produiront ses véhicules en Ukraine sont supposé être ouvertes d'ici 2025. En plus des CV, l'Ukraine va également produire sur son territoire des KF41 Lynx en partenariat avec Rheinmetall afin de remplacer complètement les marders reçu et créer une flotte plus importante. Le premier véhicule de se type est supposé sortir des usines d'ici Décembre de cette année, selon le PDG de Rheinmetall lui-même.
is it a game changer? lol
Oldie but Goldie ! Marder - our beloved Iron Boar
In Ukraine 🇺🇦 they've fought together with the American Donated Strykers...
Proud Swedish taxpayer here. Glad to see money well spent.
Well the CV90 get some well deserved battle experience. Will benefit in further development
Proud GERMAN taxpayer here. Glad to see money well spent.
@@guebay-k5y третий год, а могло бы уже все закончится, если бы меркельша не обнималась, а шольц был бы смелее
You should be.. , and the most effective coins ever spent on security of Swedish defence…👍
@@guebay-k5y🇩🇪🤝🏻🇺🇦
Great report. Western infantry fighting vehicles save Ukrainian lives.
Well it helps the Ukraines, but like everythings else it can also get killed
Ukraine is running out of soldiers. They are literally arresting Ukrainians around EU and deporting them back to Ukraine to force them to fight.
Ага. Именно поэтому у вас бойцы тцк гребут свежую свинину на улице
As a South African...I'm proud to see the world and countrys coming together to support Ukraine...may God bless every country that sent help and thank you to all for sending ....Slava 💪
I'm not sure which Western IFV is the best, but I can see that the Ukrainians love their Bradleys and it makes me proud, as an American! 🇺🇸❤️🇺🇦
My impartial opinion is the CV90 is he best, purely because it's a very recent design which includes far more modern elements has a better main weapon, but to say the Bradley was being designed as far back as the 1960s it's a fantastic vehicle. Part of its brilliance is in its versatility and ease of adding modern weapons, targeting systems and armour tylored for specific missions. It's like the F16of the ground.
The Canadian LAV 3 has been marked as one of the best in the world, better in some cases than what the US has!
If the Ukrainian military had all the tech that the US military had the war would have been over a long time ago. They adapt and overcome. They have to learn so many different types of weapons systems so fast as their life depends on it. If your country was invaded you would want all and any weapons too. Ukraine needs all the support. Money is money it's printed. Lives cannot be printed.
For the F-16 Ukraine has make there Training 3 years earlyer
Money is in fact not just printable. Ever wonder why you spend 100$+ on groceries per person each week? Governments cannot just print money without increasing economic output, otherwise you are just going into deficit and causing massive inflation
They print 541 million per day...@@jaxastro3072
@@jaxastro3072 541 million printed a day
@@jaxastro3072 Yeah, well the US intend to raise inflation anyway, as the only way they can minimize their massive debt
That clip about the Marders is at least a year old, since Ukraine's received 140 of them by now.
The fact that we've barely seen them or the CV90's is a sign that Ukraine is keeping its best IFV's safe for when offensive and counteroffensive opportunities present themselves, like in Kursk.
There has not been much mobile warfare since last year. Those are usefull in raids like kursk... but if they are used for trench warfare, they will be stationary primary targets. Lets hope Ukraine will do some more actions like in the north. in the east they need modern artillerie and digging tools.
Even trenches need supplying @@tyrson2445
The Marders are favored by special forces do to more compact and have excellent traction in mud and snow, could be why we don't see those as much.
All scrap metal now.
The reason you haven't seen any CV 90 footage is because the Swedish government requested that they don't publish any footage of it in combat...
It's so awesome to see these Bradley crews really own it on the Battlefield - The kit is giving them confidence which means they'll push on.
Granpa Bradley still kicking
IIRC Marders are even older.
Ukraine is now full of destroyed Bradleys.
The Marder is ancient compared to the Bradley but it is still more than a match for anything Ru has. The Bradley and CV-90 are overkill.
Old dog on the field
@@jacksonteller1337yeah especially when looking at the BMP and BTR. Both are amphibious and as a result the armour is paper thin.
Hopefully some " CV90120MkIV " will make their way to Ukraine. Would be very interesting to see the latest design in action...
The 120 is good but its a tank as it loses the infantry carrying capacity. The beauty of the CV90 series is the modularity and how it can be so many different things, but I think the CV90 MK IV with the 35 mm would be more appropriate and useful in more situations. Wouldn't mind them having both types, but given limited resources I would focus the IFVs as IFVs and tanks as tanks and have Leopard 2s and Abrams on one side and CV90s and Bradleys on the other.
Not sure if it will make any difference, but no doubt, Ukraine needs more IFV´s and tanks.
I have to agree with@@AlexAnteroLammikko . 8 out of 10 times an IFV is the better tool for the job. And in the remaining 20% of cases you‘re way better off using a proper MBT. There are uses for vehicles like the CV90120, but they are limited to the situations in which an IFV is insufficient but a proper MBT isn’t available. With proper planning this is typically either the case in very small militaries that cannot justify a separate tank platform or in expeditionary forces that cannot justify the logistics footprint of a proper MBT. Neither is applicable to Ukraine‘s situation. Thus it’s better to spend the available resources on MBTs and IFVs.
@@RichelieuUnlimited arguably having a low cost fire support platform with the same supply train as your IFV's you can get more vehicles on the same budget with less support personnel. Yet to see anyone bet real money that it will work though.
There is only a few prototypes and no one have them on order Ukrain won't see any of them, but they should get som cv90lvkv to help counter drones and heli.
Slava Ukraini! ✊
В чем слава то?
Good job les gars, gloire à l'Ukraine ✌✌✌
В чем слава то?
@@MrBonako SLAVA ROSSII🥰
CV90❤❤❤❤
Its a good and relatively new IFV
@@Pz.history the best
I have been following this since Sweden and the Netherlands gifted all of those CV90s to Ukraine.
What’s certain is that Ukraine has kept the CV90 in more of a supporting role, for medivacs and similar tasks. Meanwhile, the Bradley has been sent on numerous missions and used more regularly.
The CV90 has been involved in some missions, but nothing compared to the Bradley.
Originally Ukraine only got 50 cv90’s so it makes sense for them to use them more carefully. 🇸🇪🦅🇺🇦
WE BELIEVE IN UKRAINE!
🫡🇺🇸🤝🏻🇺🇦
Imagine how many people who have lost their lives in this war. And still the Politicians talk the same B Sh*t instead of actually doing something. Scale up the production and let Ukraine point out what they need and then give it to them.
@@Pz.historyEuropeans need to learn to stop warring against each other every 20 years.
PATETIC!
Marder ❤️🇺🇦🫶🇩🇪
Slava Ukraine 💙💛✌️💯🤝🔱🔰🔱👍💖💖💖💖💖
Fleissiger unterstützer 🤗
👍🇺🇦✌️
В чем слава Украины?
SLAVA KOKAINE!
CV90 Best there is !
Rather Ukrainians in Sudzha than Russians in Bucha.
Slava Ukraini !!!
good timing because the US had a LOT of Bradleys and didn't need them anymore.
As much as this whole drama can be "good" in any way.
Weras the german army was tragically underfunded and underequpipped for decades.
During the cold war the west-german Bundeswehr owned more than 2,000 Marders, today most of them are sold all over the world or scrapped. 120 Marder were delivered to Ukraine so far, but there are probably not much left in the stocks.
the Bundeswehr wasnt/isnt underfunded/underequipped, as we know now for certain the russian army was/is a paper tiger which couldnt compete with NATO forces on any level ... Ukraine had only a small fraction of what NATO has and still gets only a tiny fraction of what NATO spends on its own forces, yet it still manages to fight the russian army with favorable odds/casualty ratios and now even went to invade russia itself after years of conflict.
So stop this nonsense of NATO/Germany being underfunded / underequipped, this never was the case since the end of the cold war. This new arms race among NATO members is a fearmongering scam just serving the arms industry and absolutely goes beyond what anyone would need to secure NATO. You have to be really terrible at math to look at the numbers and claim that NATO hasnt enough / wouldnt invest enough in its military.
If we were smart we wouldnt have to increase our own military spending at all, simply directing a portion of that spending directly to Ukraine (rather then only giving the old stuff we replace) would fully cover what is needed to defeat russia and that investment would still be far less then what we spend right now.
Not only the German Army. Pretty much every european country have made budget cut in their defense forces
The Marder were also already in the phase out at the Bundeswehr. It is also being phased out in other armies, where they are replaced by Lynx, Puma or CV90. The Bradley is still in use in the US though and the replacement project is still in the early development stage.
Btw, the Marder was already due to being replaced in the 1990s with a planned Marder 2 heavy IFV. That was then cancelled after the cold war ended. So it is that old, but still much better than the Russian crap.
Bradley ifv are Effective in Ukraine!
I hope you will get more CV90's. And Gripens. ✈
And You are. To Eastern front, bggg
The Bradley is one of the best tanks out there!
And it's not even a tank...smfh
@@AndyWoohoo666 oh it’s a tank.
🇩🇪🤝🏻🇺🇦
The best thing about the Bradley is not only that its a good vehicle, but its available in big numbers. the Marder is also good and well armored for an older IFV but sadly will never be supplied in big numbers. The CV90 is amazing, but also lacks in numbers sadly.
A lot of brilliant mechanical engineers I graduated with at the University of California at Davis went to work for FMC: the Farm Machinery Corooration who designed and built the Bradley Fighting Vehicle.
God Bless Ukraine🙌
SLAVA UKRAINI!!!
Le CV90 est vraiment super !C'est dommage que aucun CV90 105 et 120 on été envoyer ainsi que la version obusier de 155mm. Mais c'est déjà super et c'est un des meilleurs IFV. Dommage que l'on a très peut de vidéo de se véhicule au combat.
No gun-version of the CV90 was ever put into production.
The lack of videos and footage is due to the Ukrainians honouring the direct request to not show off Swedish materiel in use.
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
They are definitely propping the Bradley up a bit, but the results speak for themselves. We don't see turrets flying into orbit and the crews survive everytime they lose one of these.
Long live Ukraine.
Outstanding coverage bravo subscribed
Come on the uk surely the warrior could do a job over there especially since they are being retired and scrapped
💛💙💛💙
Great, thanks 👍
Marder is btw not that bad at all
Nope, dont understand why some people ( do guess alot of them not from the military) hate it
nope 😅@@Pz.history
My heart goes out to anyone involved in that conflict. Russian, Ukrainian, anyone. I don’t want this to turn out to be a wider conflict, and I certainly would like this conflict to stop period, but sadly I think we are mere months away from it.
🇩🇪❤️🇺🇦
Glória a Ucrânia Vitória aos heróis
Будущие экспонаты парка Патриот. Привозите еще.
Nice coordination.
From Indonesia ❤
слава україні хай Бог береже все українське військо на полі бою.
Slava Ukraina! 🇮🇪🍺👍🇺🇦
🇺🇦💪🇺🇦❤️🇺🇦💪🇺🇦
Very good vid !=8)
Of the 3 Western IFV's, in the configurations Ukraine currently has, the M2A2SA+BRAT is the best followed by Marder.
If the CV90 were basically anything other than the 40mm variant they have, it'd be the best but having to reload every ~21 rounds is just a pain in the ass...
Well it comes with a range unequaled by other IFVs.
Clueless.
I disagree with the criticism regarding the 40mm cannon’s limited rounds. While it may have fewer rounds loaded, I’d much rather have a weapon that packs a punch than one that merely irritates the enemy. Take the Puma, for example. It's an impressive machine, but its 30mm cannon, though capable, won’t do much more than temporarily obscure the enemy’s vision. it won’t deliver a knockout blow. Both vehicles are effective, but they serve different purposes based on their armament.
Moreover, I’m pleased that Ukraine received the CV9040C. It’s one of the few early 2000s variants that boasts excellent protection and armor, with added mine protection and robust frontal and side defenses.
Ultimately, debating which vehicle is superior is akin to arguing which caliber is better. 5.56mm or 7.62mm. Both have their merits, depending on the context and the mission requirements. 🇸🇪🦅🇺🇦
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦
Complete with a shroud to break up heat signature . . . . Evan, what is the wild boar over there? I dunno Pvt Conscriptovich, but lets go get it!
Evan, how big guns do boars in Ukraine usually have...?
Don't be silly Pvt. Conskriptovich, boars doesn't have guns...
*Bofors 40/L70: BOOMBOOMBOOMBOOM!cllingclangkaclang!*
...Evan... i... do not thin.. that.. was a.. boahhhrghhhh...💀
Slava Ukraini !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SLAVA UKRAINI!!!!!!!
55,000 Sherman tanks later..Thank you Detroit and Chicago. The Crew makes the Tank.
There are very little video of the cv90 in Ukraine.
Slava Ukrainii💙💛
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 😊
Another one for the utube algorithm
Thank you, US of America!
Пояснице слава! Попрошайки
*Первый сюжет было очень волнительно, когда бойцов ВСУ зажали в окопе. И как радостно было видеть как к ним спешит на помощь Бредли и прикрывает их огнем. Слава Украине! С уважением из Казахстана*
To say that the Bradley was “truly battle proven” by Ukrainians is a stretch. Bradleys destroyed more vehicles in Desert Storm than any other armored vehicle. More than Abrams, Challengers, Warriors, AMX-30s, etc. The Bradleys then were less advance than the ones Ukraine was given. No piece of American tech given to Ukraine needed to be “tested and proven” by Ukrainians.
While you are right, you can say that Moskals are a harder enemy than Iraqia, who really did not have much fight in them.
It is true - but same time not true. As one man said that the fight of the Coalition against the Iraq Army was a fight of a proffessionel heavy weight boxer against a 12 year old bully. It is proven that in desert storm more US soldiers died trough friendly fire. So actually it is true that the real test is right now Ukraine - because the Russian have equipment that is sometimes UP to Date. So now the Bradley truly had to show his worth and it looks like he is doing fine.
The Bradley and Abrams are Cold War era vehicles meant to fight the Soviets in a European war. This is that European war, with the piss-poor descendants of the soviets. Kinda makes sense that the desert wars/coin conflicts aren't the right area to prove a vehicle not meant for that environment or conflict. However it is well proven in the combat it has seen under the American flag, as you noted. Just leaving this "both sides ya'll" here
switchblade drone ,GLmRs etc. There is a lot to be tested on the battlefield and they failed
To be honest and fair.
The US fought an enemy wich wasnt even near the technology of the US
The Iraqi neither had Night Vision, drone scouting or even automated turrets.
You cant really compare this
Europe must creat the EAF..European Armed Forces,and uniformize(if it's even a word..) the equipment and machinery..Europeans,Europe is al we've got..let's keepit ours and strong.
ขอให้พระคุ้มครองทหารยูเครนและพันธมิตรยูเครนทุกๆนายครับ❤❤❤🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦❤️❤️🙏🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🙏❤️❤️❤️ ไม่อยากให้ท่านออกไปประทะโดยตรงกับรัสเซียเลย อยากให้ท่านใช้กามิกาเซ่ ปืนใหญ่ ขีปนาวุธ ส่งไปแทนเพื่อรักษากำลังพลของเรา❤️❤️🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦❤️🙏🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🙏❤️❤️❤️
Дуже гарно зроблено.
Добре представлено.
чудово Країну можна врятувати..
Please make a report on the leopard 1a5
Bushmaster is psychological terror for the one who is attacked
Since when does this channel use AI text to speech?
Think of the great cars built by Russia and that’s what their tanks are vs western cars/tanks. There really isn’t a comparison
Well even the T-72 still killes
RU Bodycount: 616k, 1300+ recently
. . . .. .. . . .. .
2.4M+ RU casualties thus far
2,401,880+ to be exact. . ... . . .
. .
wia:1.801.410+
(Minusrus)
What kind of hallucinogenic are you on?
RU Bodycount: 620k, 1300+ recently
. .. . . .. .
2.4M+ RU casualties thus far
2,470,400 to be exact. . ..
. .
wia:1,852,800+
(Minusrus)
Americans spent approximately $300 MILLION PER DAY during its military involvement in Afghanistan over a span of about 20 years. This figure is derived from estimates that total U.S. spending in Afghanistan exceeded $2 trillion by the time of the withdrawal in 2021. This means that the West does not want Ukraine to win...
Why use AI voice?
The new GTS Boxer will soon take over.
Hi. Any reports on problems with these western IFV, do not think every thing is "happy days and red roses"!. Some rumours actually say that there is equipment out there that is crap and the UA forces only use it for transport duties. Brgds and keep on the hard work.
The 2nd Engagement Winter video is like War Thunder, Russia bias
finally being used whet they made for
Zelensky should make a request for the CV90120, it's a Light Tank based on the CV90 IFV and is armed a 120mm main gun.
It has not gone into serial production so it would take time. These days the armament is not on the shelf either.
@@LLiivveeeevviiLL you do understand what "Request" means right?
@@evilfingers4302 It appears to mean "a meaningless act"
@@LLiivveeeevviiLL
an act of asking politely or formally for something
They do have a 57mm Version...
0:06 Why does that look like our new M110 Booker IFV???
What I get from this vid is that any vehicle from the west is way ahead of anything that the Russians have.
There are no lack of videos of Bradleys in combat but almost zero footage of cv90 or marder. Did the swedes and germans prohibit combat footage of those platforms?
I think so, yes.
There are I think 3 or 4 combat missions I have seen the cv90 on. There Maybe a lot more who knows?
Did anyone notice the orb float by at 1:33?🤔wtf
It was a drone
I think the Russians have decided which Western IFV is the best. Which one requires a response from a T-90?
He was nt selling tanks they are armoured personnel carriers that have had all weapons taken off including smoke discharges.
If you had done your due diligence you would know that.
Man muss sich fragen, warum die Bradleybesatzung die Panzerbesatzung, nachdem der Kampfpanzer unbrauchbar geschossen war, nicht mit dem MG bekämpft hat? Es sollten ja auch Infanteristen an Bord sein, die das übernehmen solten.
RU Bodycount: 621k, 1200+ recently
. .. . . .. .
2.4M+ RU casualties thus far
2,470,400 to be exact. . , , .,.,,, , , ..., ..
. .
wia:1,852,800+
(Minusrus)
I don't like tanks. They are sitting ducks for aerial vehicles like drones, helicopters and fighter jets.
My respect for Ukrainians!
Well you still need them, when you fight against a real Army
Only 2% of all cv90 in Ukraine have been destroyd, 25% of the bradly and 13% of the marder
If all is going so well why is Ukraine loosing ground, all over the front lines?
10 hours politic is better as 10 years of war...and this war with DU Ammo is not the best choice for the future...
Bradley wasn't battle proven in the gulf war, Iraq and Afghanistan?
Bradley TH-cam time 9min. Marder and CV90 3min. Why Bradley had more time?
why Ukrainians not using mesh ?
hard+soft, two of them. also on a doors and windows.
and why ruzzians are vell comuflage when Ukrainians not ?
They dont need to, these vehicles can take hits.
Do Russia have something even close to the CV90?
Nope, the coming Kurganets-25 is modular but it has trial issues.
What does " indirect fire from 7km. Away" even mean ? I dont understand 🤔
Basically they use the CV90 as artillery by shooting portée, it's not the purpose of the gun and it's further then normal action for the gun.
❤❤❤
It’s an excellent avf but they are still slowly losing ground unfortunately.
I think that the war will end by negotiation and Ukraine losing the Russian speaking part of Ukraine to Russia.
Just being honest.
There's one caveat here: there are insofar lots of publicised M1A2 Bradely battlefield videos, one Marder video from Kursk Oblast and none of the CV9040. Of course that is what I have watched and can recollect off the top of my head, but that is in pretty good comformity with reality. I wonder if the CV9040 is not seen performing missions on the battlefield due to logistical issues or some political constraints.
No, the CV90 hasn’t seen as much combat action as the Bradley. While it has been involved in some missions, it hasn’t been deployed as frequently. The reason Ukraine has chosen this approach is likely due to the CV90's greater value and more advanced technology. They are preserving these vehicles for strategic purposes.
Additionally, it’s important to remember that Ukraine initially received only 50 CV90s, so their limited numbers make them even more valuable. In contrast, the Bradley has been available in greater numbers, which may explain why it’s seen more extensive use in combat.
@@2.Cuzzzz Ah, that's quite a reasonable explanation. Thatnks!