Japanese AEGIS Destroyers: More Than Arleigh Burke Copies

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @yangyu9990
    @yangyu9990 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Great deep dive video!
    Thanks for all your hard work, always manage to learn something in every video.
    One of the best military analysis channels around.

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks Yang Yu. I am flattered!

  • @gyasiansa3358
    @gyasiansa3358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    This guy just brings out good contents just Like H.I. Sutton and so unbiased. Keep up the good work Eurasian Naval insight ✌️✌️

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thanks, friend

    • @TimothyOakes
      @TimothyOakes ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sutton is in a league of his own.

  • @JD-dm1uj
    @JD-dm1uj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    The JMSDF is the top three surface navy in world, IMO, vice Russia. When it comes to submarines, completely different story! Absolutely loved this video, awesome job! 🇯🇵

  • @fiftycal1
    @fiftycal1 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    The Japanese have effectively been forced to build a modern military - including AEGIS Destroyers. They have three threats to consider: Russian and Chinese Naval Military Power - additionally North Korea 🇰🇵 has often launched ballistic missiles that have landed in Japan’s EEZ.

  • @JamesSavik
    @JamesSavik ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The Japanese are brilliant engineers and shipwrights. It's no surprise at all that the JMSDF is professional and powerful.

  • @gyzq
    @gyzq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Comparing to JAXA's Hayabusa2 asteroid sample-return mission, developing a cruise missle will be like a park walk.

  • @flo4710
    @flo4710 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome video!😊❤

  • @kqckeforyou4433
    @kqckeforyou4433 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    There i remember wasn't there Work on a surface launched version of the ASM-3 because that would be a small but an effectiv upgrade. i think there called XSSM

  • @dyong888
    @dyong888 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So it looks like the Maya class are comparable to the Type 055 Destroyers. It might not have the S and X band radars I'm not sure. But the CEC is impressive. I'm guessing the 055 and perhaps the new Chinese Frigates will also have something similar?

  • @commanderaat5001
    @commanderaat5001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    For a country that had no army or navy, Japan sure had a powerful Warship that most real navy of a country cannot compete. Especially their destroyer. Honestly, if my country purchased 3 of them from Japan, that's already enough to rival in the entire region lol

    • @fatdoi003
      @fatdoi003 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      their neighbour S Korea navy is nothing to laugh at as well..... but compared to Chinese navy is still a long way to go..

  • @FahrurRoziqin
    @FahrurRoziqin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    they have root of technology already, have some of the Key technology in Asia, so, it's easy to just build i think

    • @georgedang449
      @georgedang449 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some key technology, not all. Significant components still have to be imported, and are beholden to countries that produced them. They're not China, with complete supply chain in house. Argentina found that out the hard way during the Falklands war.

    • @alexlo7708
      @alexlo7708 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most Japan tech are US direcly used tech. I was stunt when I saw Japan PC in'80 which it had boost up with Japanese language screen and I found later that it is MS DOS version that juat translate to japanese words.

    • @NationChosenByGod
      @NationChosenByGod ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexlo7708 They invented the Aegis and Aesa radar which the US wanted to collaborate with them.

    • @alexlo7708
      @alexlo7708 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NationChosenByGod No , Aegis or Aesa radar were 1st invented by Soviets or US. The earlier type was SCANFAR which had deployed on US warships. Soviet warships in the same period can be seen equipped with the same type of radar.
      I'd therefore say that early Aegis was PESA radar ,not Aesa. And Japan transceiver in its 1st Aesa airborne radar has very low power that it cannot challenge conventional wave tube radar one. That's why the US didn't abruptly deploy its own Aesa until high-power high-frequency semiconductor fabrication are matured enough. So, Japan was just a result of failure trying on its F2 fighter.

    • @NationChosenByGod
      @NationChosenByGod ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alexlo7708 No the Aegis and Aesa was invented by Japan.

  • @Glorymoon97
    @Glorymoon97 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I've always liked Japan. They've done more for us than Europe has.

    • @oberstleutnant787
      @oberstleutnant787 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only like Japense porno movies and their female AV stars.

    • @cosmoray9750
      @cosmoray9750 ปีที่แล้ว

      8 former Navy officers imprisoned by Qatar accused of spying on emirate’s super-secret submarine programme.
      Allegedly spying for Israel arrested in Qatar

    • @tylersoto7465
      @tylersoto7465 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True, Nintendo, Mitsubishi, playstation and super Mario bros says it all

  • @jesusdiaz3776
    @jesusdiaz3776 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    "We don't need an army. Look at Japan, they don't have armed forces and are a great country" HAHAHAHAHA, Well, let me tell you...

  • @jeffryb
    @jeffryb ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Well done videos, very PLAN leaning, but every source has an angle.

  • @timothyshiu2263
    @timothyshiu2263 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Churchill said who rule the sea is who rule the world.
    Now, the drone says who rule the drone is who rule the war.
    Destroyer, aircraft carrier, etc is equivalent to castle. And the drone is the equivalent to cannon.

  • @bigman23DOTS
    @bigman23DOTS ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is a lot at stake these vessels are very capable at defending themselves and their home lands from missile attacks!

  • @oklahoma1232
    @oklahoma1232 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Yamato was their flagship & Abe should have joined it !

    • @cholodelrosari0543
      @cholodelrosari0543 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Imagine they made another type of aegis destroyers with hypersonic missiles then they named it 'Yamato'

  • @zenki4666
    @zenki4666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    2nd comment
    A self defense force with 2 de facto aircraft carriers !

    • @kqckeforyou4433
      @kqckeforyou4433 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well it makes sense to have even if because there an Island Nation

  • @ph11p3540
    @ph11p3540 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love the look of most of the Japanese SDF navy ships. Akagi, Kongo, Atago, Maya, Hyuga to the flat topped Hyuga and Izumo class destroyers. 2nd most powerful navy in the world yet it's all hamstrung buy it's military constitution.

  • @outbacktrek
    @outbacktrek 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

  • @musa7010
    @musa7010 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    JMSDF Aged destroyer is super best 😂

  • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
    @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well they did name of their new carriers Kaga,

  • @koonsiang0345
    @koonsiang0345 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If there is anything learnt from the Ukraine war is whether any conflict can be sustained after an initial engagement. Supplies, repairs and even replacements. At this moment I dot see how Japan can continue after losing some ships.

  • @jasonsmith1143
    @jasonsmith1143 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    love they still used WW2 IJN name for their new ship
    Atago, Maya, Kongo 💪💪💪💪👍👍👍

    • @kristoffermangila
      @kristoffermangila ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh yeah, how about the Royal Navy... take for example the upcoming Type 26 frigates, the City-class. Almost all of the names of the ship being built are from the Town-class light cruisers of the 1930's, like Glasgow and Belfast.

  • @jonaspete
    @jonaspete ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nippon no tameni!

  • @warrenpuckett4203
    @warrenpuckett4203 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is quantity VS quality. Toyota vs FAW type of doing business.

  • @eslima70
    @eslima70 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Muito bom.

  • @jus4getLovv
    @jus4getLovv ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Japan need to handle China! So they know what they’re dealing with!

  • @kalui96
    @kalui96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    ニッポンを元気に!

    • @changchadchanamdong2668
      @changchadchanamdong2668 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They are in a tight position. Being a lapdog of USA and problems with china too.

  • @theredbar-cross8515
    @theredbar-cross8515 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Like the Americans, the Japanese lack a cutting-edge hypersonic anti-ship missile. Their AEGIS is also of questionable effectiveness against stealth aircraft.
    Still though, their fleet could be the decisive factor in a Sino-American naval war over Taiwan.

    • @davout5775
      @davout5775 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      America leads the development of hypersonic missiles and they are by far head and shoulders above the rest in terms of testing. There is no evidence to support the claims of the Chinese and Russians to have such weapons and considering the latests testing of hypersonic weapons in China missed the target by over 30km it is very safe to say that China has a lot of work to do before actually developing a hypersonic weapon.
      As for the effectiveness of the AEGIS system against stealth jets, there are some pretty big advantages that the Americans have over the others. First the nation have been working on stealth technology for half a century. If there is a nation in the world that can develop a system to protect against stealth jets it is the US. And to be honest J-20 is not exactly the stealthiest jet out there. It is no where near the sophistication of F-22 or F-35. J-20 is slightly better than the stealthiest 4th gen jet at best.

    • @georgedang449
      @georgedang449 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@davout5775 We're far behind China in hypersonic missiles.

    • @davout5775
      @davout5775 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@georgedang449 Like how? China to this day don't have any hypersonic missiles that are also maneuverable. None! Not even a single one! They claim they have but just like the Russians it is only claims. They do not have the technical means to produce such missiles and they don't have the advanced communications infrastructure as well. You can't make hypersonic missiles without addressing the problems and they clealry haven't

    • @georgedang449
      @georgedang449 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@davout5775 Oh man, you're a decade out of date. Been living under a rock?

    • @davout5775
      @davout5775 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@georgedang449 Prove me wrong then bot

  • @miguellines5907
    @miguellines5907 ปีที่แล้ว

    It seems to me that japan nowaday is not good at building or making stuff at large size. Most of current japanese good quality product were smaller size. While it does not has the ability, the last thing it can do is to copy.

  • @akvendetta381
    @akvendetta381 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Russian and Chinese Navy Nothing much to Japanese Navy. Japan Navy are More Powerful.

    • @32JGMV
      @32JGMV ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sure 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @tonton7568
      @tonton7568 ปีที่แล้ว

      just like saying the taliban army are nothing much to american army. Taliban are more powerful

    • @burgermeister6199
      @burgermeister6199 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonton7568 civilians are the only reason that the Taliban is still around. Its hard to find the Taliban when they just blend in with the civilian population. The Taliban is not more powerful they are just good at hiding and taking advantage of the civilians and making them hate western freedom. You are promoting people that do not care about human rights and are just as bad as the CCP

    • @koonsiang0345
      @koonsiang0345 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonton7568 Or the Ukrainian Army is superior to the Russians

    • @bluelivesmatter3600
      @bluelivesmatter3600 ปีที่แล้ว

      Go away clown 😂

  • @balongride3169
    @balongride3169 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Top 5 List of most powerful destroyer in the world
    1. Russia
    2. China
    3. USA
    4. UK
    5. Japan

    • @SeanSoraghan
      @SeanSoraghan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia no 1 u joking ?