It’s interesting that the generative AI used by the remove tool is different than the generative AI used by generative fill. I didn’t know there was no resolution constraint on the generative AI used by the remove like there is with generative fill.
Hmm. It seems companies like Adobe and Topaz are working to get people comfortable with credit consumption, while not really tracking just how many credits they are actually consuming. There may be some surprises on the credit card at some point.
Love your training videos. FYI - I use the latest version of Beta Photoshop - AI Gen sucks more than it did last year. It's highly prudish - I can't make it finish the side of an arm, as an example.
I found both generative fill and the remove tool to be unusable in this new version and had to go back to PS 2024. The difference in output from each version was staggering, it's like they just went backwards to an earlier, more primitive version
I have read that to generate one AI image (not sure what size) takes the electricity equivalent of charging a phone (not sure what size). Question: can users give unused credits to other users?
I really enjoy the new distractions removal tool for wires and cables. But I was disappointed because I thought it would remove fence wire automatically and easily. It does not do it. Nothing happens even after using all of the options available
Surprise! If you open Creative Cloud, search for ... "credits" ... you will, of course, see the info you seek. It's in typical Adobespeak, tons of claims and distraction but it does eventually get to the point. Looks like 500 a month for my Photographer Plan.
Open up the Creative Cloud App to the Home page, and in the upper right corner there is a little blue pie-chart sort of symbol. That's your Account button. Click that and a box should pop up showing your monthly credits and what you've used so far. Note that at this time, there is no charge for going over your limit, and you can keep generating after they're all gone. That is sure to change, so be sure and keep up to date...
Thank goodness Adobe has come out with Content Credentials - they are ramping up the ability for the viewer to discern AI generated or assisted imagery - as much of the public wants more and more real stuff to see.
Nice info, but I am now completely confused. AI costs to use? Its there in my subscription of PS that I've had for over a year now, and I've used a bit here and there, but nothing has prompted me to pay extra for it, so I don't understand. Sry
Isn't Photoshop Beta excluded? They say, "Features that do not deduct any credits for generations - for a limited time and may change: Adobe Photoshop - Generative Workspace (beta)"
Thanks for the video. But bring an utterly toxic company is actually what most people seem to be talking about when it comes to Adobe these days, and long may it continue. My wish for Santa is that they get pasted by a revamped Apple Photos, for instance, in 2025. They’ve long had it coming.
I was editing some photos with military officers, and I used the AI Generation to replace a plain white wall background with a USA flag behind them. Got some great results with Photoshop 2024, but in the middle of editing the job, Photoshop upgraded to 2025 and WOW, it's like Adobe has no idea what an American flag looks like!! They were absolutely horrid!! After re-trying many different descriptions with the retry button, I finally gave up and had to resort to finding a good flag photo and just used the, "Replace background" option and chose that file. The new 2025 Ai version is in my opinion, a major step backwards! It rarely gives good results. Very disappointing. Sometimes the results are truly awful, and I've wasted much time getting no usable results, but I bet Adobe still counts them against me. IMO I have rejected more than I have had usable results, especially in the 2025 version! Might be time to really see what Affinity can do for me. So tired of the subscription rip-offs and now they want to bill me for Ai generations that re unusable!!
🚨 ⚠ The MOST used word in this video "credit / credits" ... this here tells you where Adobe's focus is these days. Adobe should be ashamed of themselves, we are already paying big $ for our subscription.
What's all this about 'credits'? Is Adobe charging our credit card when we use Generative AI? This in addition for the subscription they charge for the Photographer's package? How long has this been going on? A big percent of the time, it comes back that I failed to comply with community standards, was I charged for that? IF my 80 year old Mother's arm got in the picture and Adobe decided it needed to be censored, I may never use Generative AI ever again. Maybe this would be the ideal time to make the switch to ACDSee.
You get credits when you subscribe, look it up. You use them up as you do power intensive computation outside your PC. Yes I think you should switch to ACDSee.
$10 a month is not in your income range? That's what I pay for Photoshop, Lightroom (that I never use) Camera RAW and Bridge. One of the best deals around.
I have no idea exactly how time-consuming it is for you to whip up a presentation like this on a subject so familiar to you, probably not a lot. But from my end there isn't a wasted word. It's remarkable in a media space full of presenters shoveling filler. I can stop and forward/back and replay statements in this and just get a ton out of it, and it's a complete whole. Pithy applies here, you are Mr. Pith.
Why don't we skip all the boring human creativity once and for all. 'Hi, I am your Adobe Super AI Pet - Shall we make your shot perfect together? - Yes, I thought so..' Now Duocell Dennis only have to push one single slider on a scale from 10 to 100 (Credits) and add a few instructions. '100' even comes with support: - 'IF you want me to add something differenct, Buster - then at least spell the instructions correctly!' ... What?! ... You are banned and blocked for a week, your credits have been removed!
I can help you come in off the ledge. Scenario: You are a kid working for pay in some shop for $22 an hour, and they tell you at 9am they want that pic of that road in those sandstone cliffs to be 4x the size by 9:30 for a meeting, you go do as was described herein, and you are a hero. They are going to cover it with type for an ad. They, not knowing any better, love it and can loaf about working on your own art for a couple hours. Grinding away at image area replacement is a labor of love for some few images, but often it's just busywork.
@@johnsmith1474 ;O) Your good explanation is waisted on me, John. I quit the Adobe syndicate for more than a year ago after having found out how clever the free! Darktable is and how good the one time cheap Affinity Photo works - both without AI. To be honest, the noise reduction in Darktable is nothing to write about, so I initially run my noisy keepers through DxO PureRAW n (this is where AI shines) and work in Darktable on the perfect DNGs.
Love your videos always Deke. Love the ability to upscale the AI to a decent res, Any other new features? I mean old style enhancements, maybe some new "Just do it" features; repairing obvious glitches and bugs in the software that've been there for years? What about them introducing some new features, now that graphics card technology has become super-powerful … ? 1. "Live Liquify"? How about a feature where liquefy can be used to work within the image frame, rather than having to go into a dialog? The old reason this couldn't happen, was that live adjustment layers and floating blended layers ABOVE the liquefy layer you are working on, made it too complicated to render. With new graphics card technology, it will now definitely be possible. Anyone that actually worked with AI, knows that 99 times out of 100, editing has to happen on the rendering. Features like this would help greatly
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
I have attended many of your courses when there were Photoshop World conventions. You were my favorite instructor there.
I’m interested in the resolution flexible workspace. Please review and explain how that works and your thoughts on whether it’s ready for prime time
Did Adobe stop updating photoshop on the iPad?
always exciting when we get a new photoshop deke 💪
It’s interesting that the generative AI used by the remove tool is different than the generative AI used by generative fill. I didn’t know there was no resolution constraint on the generative AI used by the remove like there is with generative fill.
Thanks, I enjoy your presentation. I wonder if the AI denoise feature in the Details panel of LR , requires credits?
Hmm. It seems companies like Adobe and Topaz are working to get people comfortable with credit consumption, while not really tracking just how many credits they are actually consuming.
There may be some surprises on the credit card at some point.
Yes, Deke, please cover the Generative Workspace, currently in beta. Thanks.
Love your training videos. FYI - I use the latest version of Beta Photoshop - AI Gen sucks more than it did last year. It's highly prudish - I can't make it finish the side of an arm, as an example.
I found both generative fill and the remove tool to be unusable in this new version and had to go back to PS 2024. The difference in output from each version was staggering, it's like they just went backwards to an earlier, more primitive version
I agree!! Can you really roll back?
I have read that to generate one AI image (not sure what size) takes the electricity equivalent of charging a phone (not sure what size). Question: can users give unused credits to other users?
I really enjoy the new distractions removal tool for wires and cables. But I was disappointed because I thought it would remove fence wire automatically and easily. It does not do it. Nothing happens even after using all of the options available
How do we check how many credits we have, or used when AI is run?
Surprise! If you open Creative Cloud, search for ... "credits" ... you will, of course, see the info you seek. It's in typical Adobespeak, tons of claims and distraction but it does eventually get to the point. Looks like 500 a month for my Photographer Plan.
Open up the Creative Cloud App to the Home page, and in the upper right corner there is a little blue pie-chart sort of symbol. That's your Account button. Click that and a box should pop up showing your monthly credits and what you've used so far. Note that at this time, there is no charge for going over your limit, and you can keep generating after they're all gone. That is sure to change, so be sure and keep up to date...
Thank goodness Adobe has come out with Content Credentials - they are ramping up the ability for the viewer to discern AI generated or assisted imagery - as much of the public wants more and more real stuff to see.
8:45 what about needles?
Nice info, but I am now completely confused. AI costs to use? Its there in my subscription of PS that I've had for over a year now, and I've used a bit here and there, but nothing has prompted me to pay extra for it, so I don't understand. Sry
Thanks Deke
Amazing. 🤩
Isn't Photoshop Beta excluded? They say, "Features that do not deduct any credits for generations - for a limited time and may change: Adobe Photoshop - Generative Workspace (beta)"
outstand sir👌
Thanks for the video. But bring an utterly toxic company is actually what most people seem to be talking about when it comes to Adobe these days, and long may it continue. My wish for Santa is that they get pasted by a revamped Apple Photos, for instance, in 2025. They’ve long had it coming.
I was editing some photos with military officers, and I used the AI Generation to replace a plain white wall background with a USA flag behind them. Got some great results with Photoshop 2024, but in the middle of editing the job, Photoshop upgraded to 2025 and WOW, it's like Adobe has no idea what an American flag looks like!! They were absolutely horrid!! After re-trying many different descriptions with the retry button, I finally gave up and had to resort to finding a good flag photo and just used the, "Replace background" option and chose that file. The new 2025 Ai version is in my opinion, a major step backwards! It rarely gives good results. Very disappointing. Sometimes the results are truly awful, and I've wasted much time getting no usable results, but I bet Adobe still counts them against me. IMO I have rejected more than I have had usable results, especially in the 2025 version! Might be time to really see what Affinity can do for me. So tired of the subscription rip-offs and now they want to bill me for Ai generations that re unusable!!
Wait Bro Say Whaaaaa is this credit system pulling off those of us that have paid for full Adobe monthly membership$?!?
🚨 ⚠ The MOST used word in this video "credit / credits" ... this here tells you where Adobe's focus is these days. Adobe should be ashamed of themselves, we are already paying big $ for our subscription.
Who's going to pay for the electricity??
Is Midjourney free nowadays?
what a terrible path to go down
What's all this about 'credits'? Is Adobe charging our credit card when we use Generative AI? This in addition for the subscription they charge for the Photographer's package?
How long has this been going on? A big percent of the time, it comes back that I failed to comply with community standards, was I charged for that? IF my 80 year old Mother's arm got in the picture and Adobe decided it needed to be censored, I may never use Generative AI ever again.
Maybe this would be the ideal time to make the switch to ACDSee.
As does Topaz Labs!
You get credits when you subscribe, look it up. You use them up as you do power intensive computation outside your PC. Yes I think you should switch to ACDSee.
Deke's demo are excellent, but the price of Adobe CC is not in my income range.
Poverty is hell...
$10 a month is not in your income range? That's what I pay for Photoshop, Lightroom (that I never use) Camera RAW and Bridge. One of the best deals around.
I have no idea exactly how time-consuming it is for you to whip up a presentation like this on a subject so familiar to you, probably not a lot. But from my end there isn't a wasted word. It's remarkable in a media space full of presenters shoveling filler. I can stop and forward/back and replay statements in this and just get a ton out of it, and it's a complete whole. Pithy applies here, you are Mr. Pith.
you still use Adobe??? lol
It's pretty good when you use the GenP version. 😂
Why don't we skip all the boring human creativity once and for all.
'Hi, I am your Adobe Super AI Pet - Shall we make your shot perfect together? - Yes, I thought so..'
Now Duocell Dennis only have to push one single slider on a scale from 10 to 100 (Credits) and add a few instructions. '100' even comes with support: - 'IF you want me to add something differenct, Buster - then at least spell the instructions correctly!' ... What?! ... You are banned and blocked for a week, your credits have been removed!
I can help you come in off the ledge. Scenario: You are a kid working for pay in some shop for $22 an hour, and they tell you at 9am they want that pic of that road in those sandstone cliffs to be 4x the size by 9:30 for a meeting, you go do as was described herein, and you are a hero. They are going to cover it with type for an ad. They, not knowing any better, love it and can loaf about working on your own art for a couple hours. Grinding away at image area replacement is a labor of love for some few images, but often it's just busywork.
@@johnsmith1474 ;O) Your good explanation is waisted on me, John. I quit the Adobe syndicate for more than a year ago after having found out how clever the free! Darktable is and how good the one time cheap Affinity Photo works - both without AI. To be honest, the noise reduction in Darktable is nothing to write about, so I initially run my noisy keepers through DxO PureRAW n (this is where AI shines) and work in Darktable on the perfect DNGs.
Love your videos always Deke. Love the ability to upscale the AI to a decent res, Any other new features? I mean old style enhancements, maybe some new "Just do it" features; repairing obvious glitches and bugs in the software that've been there for years? What about them introducing some new features, now that graphics card technology has become super-powerful … ?
1. "Live Liquify"? How about a feature where liquefy can be used to work within the image frame, rather than having to go into a dialog? The old reason this couldn't happen, was that live adjustment layers and floating blended layers ABOVE the liquefy layer you are working on, made it too complicated to render. With new graphics card technology, it will now definitely be possible.
Anyone that actually worked with AI, knows that 99 times out of 100, editing has to happen on the rendering. Features like this would help greatly
got halfway through "What No One Is Talking About" and all I see is what everyone is talking about