DISGUSTING Things From My Theology Degree
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 พ.ค. 2024
- To support me on Patreon (thank you): / alexoc
To donate to my PayPal (thank you): www.paypal.me/cosmicskeptic
To purchase Cosmic Skeptic merchandise: cosmicskeptic.teemill.com/
To anybody who supports (or even considers supporting) my channel monetarily, thank you. I am naturally grateful for any engagement with my work, but it is specifically people like you that allow me to do what I do, and to do so whilst avoiding sponsorship.
-------------------------------------VIDEO NOTES-------------------------------------
Having just finished my first year studying philosophy and theology at Oxford University, I decided to compile some of the ideas of two key thinkers from the syllabus that I find troubling.
-------------------------------------------LINKS--------------------------------------------
New Merchandise: cosmicskeptic.teemill.com/
Upcoming events: cosmicskeptic.com/events/
Athanasius, On The Incarnation (read online): www.copticchurch.net/topics/th...
Anselm, Cur Deus Homo (read online): en.wikisource.org/wiki/Cur_De...
Article I wrote on studying theology as an atheist: www.premierchristianity.com/B...
University reading list: cosmicskeptic.com/oxfordreadi...
----------------------------------------CONNECT-----------------------------------------
My Website/Blog: www.cosmicskeptic.com
SOCIAL LINKS:
Twitter: / cosmicskeptic
Facebook: / cosmicskeptic
Instagram: / cosmicskeptic
Snapchat: cosmicskeptic
---------------------------------------CONTACT------------------------------------------
Business email: cosmicskeptic@gmail.com
Or send me something:
Alex O'Connor
Po Box 1610
OXFORD
OX4 9LL
ENGLAND
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Playoffs DAY 2 // PRX vs G2 | EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/T5j2XVcDFs0/mqdefault.jpg)
This video was voted for by my supporters on Patreon, who also had early access to this video.
To learn more about supporting the channel, click here: www.patreon.com/CosmicSkeptic
It's great to have you back looking forward to this summer 😀
Hi, Alex. Did your course include anything on how people in Biblical times conceived of heaven/paradise? I think it’s interesting to consider that the everyday life for many of us - in the UK, at least - far surpasses any ancient notion of heaven: we have antibiotics, rapid transportation, food from around the world in arm’s reach, and Radio 4.
Can you update the reading list on your website please? Thank you in advance
More of this content please. Fascinating stuff.
He should do a video on this guy th-cam.com/video/o2v0Nxge4e0/w-d-xo.html
When you want to prove your point so much that you get a degree in what you criticize the most
@@MaxGrassfed I feel you too
Admirable to say the least.
Or, it's just a primary interest and the TH-cam videos are just a byproduct of that interest.
Emanuele Aurora: "When you want to prove your point so much that you get a degree in what you criticize the most"
It is the mark of an intelligent mind to be able to entertain an idea without accepting it. There are many people who are highly qualified in the field of theology who criticise it.
Let's get a degree... you know... just for the laughs Xd
Atheists often get criticized for not taking the deep theological positions of theists seriously. But when you read this stuff as an outsider, it really does sound like Tolkien deciding why one wizard is more powerful than another and why you have to take a boat to get to Valinor
Having studied theology before reaching the conclusion that Atheism makes more sense I find that many attack the lowest common denominator and tend to emphasise that Evangelical Protestantism is "true Christianity" so I kind of agree about theologians not being taken seriously.
There are core issues that take down theism, but often the nuances and questioning of what things really mean is treated like it doesn't exist. Just like the town drunk outside church yelling isn't representative of the Scientific objections to theism and Christianity in particuler
@@jasonmullinder You shouldn't muddle science together with theism....the 2 do not mix.
@@discoverrealityclover9620 I wasn't and you should make some effort to know what people are talking about before insinuating you know what they think and how they approach topics
@@jasonmullinder i spoke so clearly, it must be the reader's fault.
Your statement *clearly* mixes science with religion when you talk about *scientific* objections to *theism*
@@dozog I wasn't talking about scientific objections, I was talking about failing to differentiate between a range of people that hold similar opinions
I took a couple of theology courses in college. IIRC all of my professors happened to be religious, but one of them said as he was getting his theology degree he asked a lot of his professors if getting their theology degree strengthened or weakened their faith. It was about a 50/50 split according to him!
I feel like ot depends on your previous beliefs.. Or may be how smart you are ahaha
50/50+- not to bad when most attend biased-
When I went to a conservative Christian college one of the professors lamented that a lot of people lost faith after moving on to seminary, which in the US is like Bible graduate school. He then told us, "Only get as much education as you can keep sanctified." Imagine having to tell people to keep themselves ignorant so the indoctrination doesn't wear off.
@@luf.7648
Do we lose what we never had? Imagine for a moment you were the creator of the universe and everything in it would you be losing sleep over what people thought about you when you know they are totally dependent upon you for “…every breath they take…”?
Second year BTH student here. Started studying theology to understand my athiest friend's questions about Christianity. Thought it would strengthen my faith and I'd be able to answer him more clearly. Boy was I wrong.
When I finish my degree I will definitely ask my professors if they are theists or not because holy shit I don't know how more than half of them could be with what I have studied.
"If you disagree with somebody you ought to be able to state their case better than they can, and at that point you've earned the right to disagree with them. Otherwise you should just stay quiet." (Charlie Munger). Alex is doing an awesome job here.
Delusional. The rhetoric Alex is using is shot through with connotations and framings that are aimed at persuading the listener subliminally to regard the terms of the arguments in a more ridiculous or unworthy light. Beginning with the actually video title. This dilutes the substance of the terms, which you can only appreciate if you approach it with a charitable reading.
And *that* is what sophistry really is.
As someone who doesn't believe in Original Sin but is interested in questions of what past and present human communities have believed and why, I feel nauseated by this sort of pseudo-intellectual approach with its liberal bias to somehow take offence and look contemptuously at the various imaginative ways humans have tried to express and reason out the metaphysics behind the human condition.
@@thescholiast5118how did you manage to say literally nothing despite using so many words
@@thescholiast5118 Sounds like you're the only pseudo-intellectual here. Good job on saying absolutely nothing.
Yeah, I disagree and I ain't shutting up
@@AquarianAngel @me-qn6bh nah, he's definitely saying something worth saying, especially when the majority of O'Connors audience could take a position purely on the basis of this video.
As a kid I did want to die because I knew that if you die as a child you’ll automatically go to heaven.
I want to die regardless
@@windmillwilly teen edgelord
same
@@rag.animations Ok weirdly adamant atheist
I think it depends if you're at the age of accountability I would normally would say around 12 depends but the more you know the more u are accountable for.
What I learned from theology:
1. Pick the conclusion you want.
2. Build your argument around that.
The end.
Like a politician
Well, that's what everyone does, including atheists. It's just that not everyone is explicit about it.
@Anish Poddar, An atheist has no need to judge a good deed on something else than its good nature and effect. No need to question the moral or ethical beliefs of the deed doer.
This also means there's no need for an atheist to go into lengthy discussions about the merits and justification of good deeds. Just do it and walk away in peace.
@@cacauldr I wasn't specifically about doing good deeds. People want certain things for themselves, and they build systems of morality to justify taking actions to get what they want. Everybody does this.
Also, you seem to be assuming that certain deeds have an inherently "good" nature. That requires some basic underlying anthropocentric assumptions about human worth.
@Donald Trump Are you talking to me? Yes, my mind is open to evidence and reason.
I think the concept of Original Sin is attractive because it speaks to that part of man which realizes that we can never fully live up to our ideals.
@@user-wi5gv8gs3e You need to stop watching The History Channel
As usual Christianity have co-opted.
Karma. Good karma/bad karma is intended as lessons in growth, not a fearful punishment.
Christianity has often chosen whip rather than reward.
@@user-wi5gv8gs3e Sure you do
@@justanotherhappyhumanist8832 why not? It's cool to study history, I dont have the patience for it 😭
@@user-wi5gv8gs3e I've heard pretty much everything in the bible is plagiarized from platonists and stuff
Hi Alex, thank you for your video and your excellent interviews. I think that there are some issues with your critiques of Athanasius. I believe the problem lies in looking at early eastern church figures like Athanasius through much later western theological debates (fact vs myth, inherited guilt, the nature of death, Hell). So here are a couple of points.
1) Athanasius very likely didn't believe in the literal factuality of the garden story. On the Incarnation is the second half of a 2 part work. In the first half, Contra Gentiles, he refers to the garden story as a myth (or words to that effect. I can't recall at the moment, but I remember being surprised when I read it.) And this wasn't really an issue for the early fathers. It is now since people started taking the Bible as a science textbook, but very few people read that way in the early church. Some took it literally. Most of the big names didn't though, like Origen, Irenaeus, Gregory of Nyssa, and Basil of Caesurea. Christians and Pagans alike were trained to read allegorically, which is very foreign to our modern approach to texts. Orgien, for example, sees Scripture as having layers. Sometimes there is a literal layer, sometimes not. But we should always read spiritually with a Christocentric approach.
2) Athanasius didn't believe in original sin in the way you describe it. The prevailing metaphor for sin in the early church and still in the eastern church is that of inherited disease, not inherited legal culpability for Adam's sin. We are born into a fallen world with a predisposition to sin, but we are only responsible once we actually sin. We are not guilty for people's sins that preceded us. Augustine invented that doctrine in the 400s because of a mistranslation of Romans 5 from Greek into Latin (Augustine never learned Greek). But in the eastern church it never was taught because they could read the original Greek. And when other theologians heard about it they were shocked and distured by its break with traditional doctrine.
3) I think Athanasius uses legal metaphors to describe God's penalty of death, but I think he thinks of it in a more organic way. Death is not an arbitrarily decided legal punishment by God. God in his nature is Life, Being, Joy, Love, etc... To choose to turn away from God is thus to approach death and suffering. There is a natural, intrinsic order to the world. It's not ad hoc.
4) Surprisingly, Athanasius very possibly didn't believe in an eternal Hell. While there certainly are places where he describes punishment for the wicked, there are numerous places were he says that all humanity will be ultimately saved. Thus (though it is debateable) his view is God's use of punishment is temporal, remedial, and redemptive. And again, for the early theologians, this wasn't an issue like it was to become later. The scholar Illaria Ramelli documents how numerous early church figures were explicitly or implicitly universalist. For example, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Athanasius, St. Anthony, Gregory of Nyssa, Gregory Nazianzus, Ambrose, John Chrysostom, and others. Origen was explicitly a universalist, and Athanasius was a big fan of Origen.
5) The reason Athanasius comments about Christians being eager for death is because of how contrary it is to our human nature. It is a given that we all fear death. We flee it, ignore it, and bemoan it. We are born Death's slaves. But, if Christ rose from the dead, we can have a confident hope that we also will rise. Athanasius is making a startlingly anthropological observation. Christians don't fear death anymore, and this is really really weird. His explanation is that this only makes sense because of the Resurrection and the good news that spread after it.
Wow, amazing knowledge here thanks, i dont think he bothers to read his comments
Top tier comment and important point.
I always thought of the bible etc. as a way to formulate the workings of human experience. So this was really amazing to read. I think I would agree with Athanasius on some matters and I'm actually quite bewildered of how much your comment differs from the perspective presented.
Crazy how some information can make or break the output of interpretations
Thank you for this comment. Very educational! From what I recall from my studies, Origen proposed three ways that you can interpret a text : 1) the literal way (the event happened as described), 2) the alegorical (the event is a metaphor for sth else) and 3) the spiritual way.
Thank you so much for this. We are waiting for your TH-cam channel.
I was looking for a measured response like this, wow, as others have stated, we are looking forward to your TH-cam channel, I've subscribed just incase you post something
The ad that played before this video was a guy with a whiteboard yelling at me not to go to college.
Just thought you'd ought to know.
Excellent advice! I wish someone would have told me how hellish (so to speak) college is before I went.
If you go, at this point, you deserve the debt you will be saddled with.
Sounds more interesting than my add for an amusement/water park 900 miles from my house.
@Scooters Videos I'm not american , but even I know trump was a rich arsehole almost his whole life.
I don't get ads. Now I feel left out.
Well done for getting to Oxford. It’s no mean feat. The workload is crushing to many but well worth the effort. Stay strong. Wish you success.
The nice thing about having an Oxford degree is "so would you like a job, then?"
fantastic- from a 69 year old atheist organist ( perfect to listen to during the sermon:)
keep them coming. You should do one for each of the seasons , and major feast days. And ones on the less well know feasts such as Feast of the circumcision and Feast of fools.
Thank You for your perspective I appreciate you and your views 👍
awesome vid, thanks! My take is that I read it like a warning. If you lie, even just the tiniest bit, it will play out as guilt in the arena of your subconscious, you can't escape it. And when it unravels, or anything happens really, on some plane you know you're guilty and thus on some level want to take the blame. If you don't take the blame you'll suffer (Crime and Punishment), and if you do you'll have to be punished which is to suffer. It's a warning of how things always seem to play out in the clash between reality and human consciousness, inevitably. Unfortunately the churches have been shit at updating the scriptures to read with modern language, it's a sin in itself - pride.
"I have nothing but respect for the way theology tortures my University."
That's what I first heard when you said that you respect how it is TAUGHT IN your University. I was briefly confused.
Me too!
I cant help but ask, why on earth would you subject yourself to studying theology?
@@djhogan65 to argue against thiest doctrine and thinking, its important to understand theology and thiest thinking.
This young man is one of a new generation of athiest thinkers and biblical challengers. Christopher Hitchens would be delight to know athiest like this young man were going where he went.
@@davidvarley1812 for your average atheist just reading the bible and listening would be enough but good enough isn’t what the dedicated do
Me too
Fun History Fact: During the 4th century, Athanasius competed in three consecutive Olympic games and took the Gold medal every time. For... mental gymnastics!
Sounds like an athletic guy
hey holy koolaid cool to see you here use to watch your videos :) love em
I enjoyed his performance in the Theological Rhythmic Dance.
This is obviously Fake News (or Fake History). As a Christian, Athanasius would never have participated in pagan games.
@@pouncerlion4022 I think his performance in Synchronized Sophistry was even better.
I always enjoy what you post!
It feels so good to watch a video that doesn't have music in it. Wow I didn't realize how many videos have music in them Until right now.
Regarding “Original Sin”:
In the late 17th century, Puritan kids in New England were reading Benjamin's Harris’ 1690 _New England Primer_ which taught “In Adam’s fall, We sinned all.”
Meanwhile in China the kids were reading the Confucian-based 三字經 _Three Character Classic_ (dating from the 13th century):
人之初 People at birth,
性本善 Are naturally good.
性相近 Their natures are similar,
習相遠 Their habits make them
different.
Yes, couldn't be more different, could it?
People are not naturally good. It takes training to get any good out of any good.
Would mind posting your email ? Best wishes
@Lex Bright Raven idk where you seen those cause I only see children tormenting other children when they are crying.
@@lucas4177 those kids must be particularly cruel lol.
This thinking was central to my doubts as a child in church. There was just something clearly unfair and nonsensical about how God and hell worked. The adults around me only ever answered things like “It’s not for us to understand.” “It’s arrogant for us to judge God’s plan according to our own logic.” or “It doesn’t matter if you like it or not. That’s not how it works.”
I couldn’t put it into words as a kid certainly though. Thanks your awesome content Alex.
unfair ? how do you know it is unfair ? what is fair in your opinion ? what side of this is fair ? th-cam.com/video/e5QWRQJKWIo/w-d-xo.html
@@travelsouthafrica5048 Well for one thing you go to hell for thought crimes. So a lot of good and virtuous people would be in hell which is awfully strange.
Yes I can relate. But even if it were all true, it is still a disgusting abhorrent system.
I couldn't agree more & I remember like it was yesterday sitting in Sunday School & thinking this just doesn't make sense it doesn't ring true. And honestly as silly as it sounds what pushed me over the edge back then was discovering that they practiced animal sacrifice, burnt offerings. Which God had ordained. For me it was "Thank you, I'll get my coat"
@@J._-_-._-._-._-._-._-._-._S999 good and virtuous people ? according to what standard do you judge that they are "good" and 'virtuous' ?
allow me to explain your predicament here
th-cam.com/video/YNY1khF5WKE/w-d-xo.html
Beautifully reasoned. Great stuff
I am so sad i only just found this video, its now 3 years old so i am hoping you made more about to gp have a look. I have learned so much from this Thank you so much.
Want to hear more about your degree? Absolutely!
I agree
Dude : you don't know any of these! you're not a scholar, how can you say that!
Alex : *actually gets a major in theology*
No he didn't. No one... literally NO ONE... can get a theology degree and literally be wrong on virtually every single statement.
He does not have a degree yet. He has 1 year of school under his belt and he is processing. If he is "wrong" about the works, please give specific points and refences to counter examples. Just be carefull your evidence does not contratict itself within the same work.
One does not need a "degree" in theology to understand theology. "Theology" is the study of God. Like assholes and opinions, everybody has one about God. If you don't like CosmicSkeptic's opinion, move on.
@@SeaScoutDan is this specific enough for you. Literally every single point he started out with, he got wrong.
Catholicism isn't "Christianity"or even more than half of the Christians in the world.
How do you "KNOW" Genesis is a conglomerate of myths and plagiarisms?
Unsubstantiated claims and assertions, are just that... unsubstantiated claims and assertions.
Wrong. Infants and children all go to heaven, until they reach the age of accountability. Then they must make atonement for their own sins.
Hell. God doesn't send anyone to hell. He lets you send yourself to hell. But he affords you the means of staying out of hell, by accepting Jesus. And do you expect God to permit anyone who rejects Jesus into Heaven. No sin can enter into Heaven.
It's not a dilemma of God's creation. He gave Adam and Eve one restriction.... do not eat from the tree of knowledge OF GOOD AND EVIL (I notice you conveniently failed to mention the tree of knowledge was referring to knowledge of good and evil). Its a matter of Adam and Eve's disobedience.
I stopped watching at this point because I just couldn't stomach any further mischaracterization
@@dashlamb9318 I neither like nor dislike his opinions about God. I just want him to acknowledge that they ARE opinions ONLY and not state them as facts, as he so often is apt to do, all while getting virtually every single point wrong.
Incredible summation my friend. Cheers.
Thank you so much for this video 🙏
I'm a Theology student at Cambridge and literally just studied original sin. Your treatment of these ideas is really insightful!
I'm in highschool and interested in these kinda stuff. Is the degree worth it ? How's it going ?
@@kontoru22 open your bible and pray.
Don’t go to a college and get taught by a liberal theology professor who doesn’t know God.
What's you thoughts on it?
@@calebknieper bruh i was raised a muslim
@@calebknieper Your Bible was written by men, 2000+ years ago and is based off of older religions by yet more scientifically illiterate males who were trying to make sense of things like lightening, thunder death, etc. and tried explaining it as various things such as a “god’s anger” or “disapproval”, but how do you know it’s truly the word of any god? There is no real compelling evidence that any of it is true, it is only something you can believe based on faith/ hope.
Back 2000-4000 years ago, almost nobody could read and owning a book was beyond their ability to afford. They had to trust the guy who could read it and if he was a dishonest man, an indoctrinated one and/or an excessively controlling man, how trustworthy could those kinds of men’s teachings be? The “ chain of custody” on the veracity of the scriptures being the true word of any god, over that many generations of religious men, is completely broken and it’s highly unreliable. Think of the standards of evidence that are demanded in a Court of Law! This level of generational verbal telling of stories about what a god’s expectations for us are, told by wannabe leaders, and then later in time written down and then rewritten in different versions ( yes, the Bible has Versions!), how could this be considered to be reliable? We’ve all heard of the Telephone game.
Ask yourselves, why would a supposedly intelligent God choose to communicate such important information to us in this flawed and unreliable manner? The obvious answer is, that it is all man made and built upon by generations of men who wanted control and power in their societies. It’s simple common sense.
New religions have sprouted up in my lifetime alone and will possibly be the new dominant religions of the masses in the future. Men like Joseph Smith, L. Ron Hubbard, David MisCavige, they can’t seem to help themselves, because it’s such a lucrative and easy power grab for them. This has been happening since the dawn of mankind.
In the King James Version of the Bible, for one example, it has 613 commandments, supposedly by a god. Wouldn’t you think there would we be at least one of those commandments that says something to the effect of, “ thou shall not ever rape a child”? There isn’t any mention of it. According to the Bible, if you rape a young women, it is only a crime against the girl’s father - the Bronze Age men of that time felt that a daughter was her father’s property and so he was due some compensation because she was a bartering piece of his property back then.
We are more moral than the Bible nowadays, thank goodness.
thank GOD for another video finally ... Oh wait
Praise jesus
Amen brother!
Hallelujah 🙏👏
Thank SCIENCE*
@@seaweedglob science damn you, you beat me to it
I really enjoyed that. Thank you, Alex.
Thank-you for sharing your education and insights. I've been a skeptic from an early age. As a child, nary a prayer of mine was ever answered, lol! l soon cottoned on that no one was listening, ha ha! Seriously though, I appreciate any shared thoughts on this subject of a higher being, religion, etc.. It is not something that I can talk about with those I know as freely as I would like, as it could possibly cause some distress and discomfort to those who do hold religious views. It is refreshing to listen to you, a pure pleasure, thanks again!
I wish it was that simple.@@isatq2133
Brilliant video, I think it's essential to learn about the things you would generally argue against. Like you've previously mentioned about admitting your own biases so that you can compensate for them.
@Trolltician Oh dear, your logic seems to be severely lacking here but I imagine with such a name, you're a bit dim anyway.
@Trolltician I'd say it's more accurate than sad but this will be the last reply because honestly, you're not worth any further effort.
@@IanD-ut4dy it’s actually quite sad.
As a Christian, Alex is by far my favourite Religious critic. Him actually being familiar with Theology makes his criticism all the more potent and worth considering.
Same here.. though I don't like his spontaneus pessemistic Hitchen-ism that reeks of personal resentment and constant "life is pain" compulsions
It's great, when he gets things right. But his treatment of Athanasius is absurd and missed all of his point - let alone the fact his misunderstanding of Genesis 1-2 (let alone the rest of "the Fall" up to the flood). He didn't even mention the most oft quoted statement from Athanasius - "God became man so that man might become God".
I dislike Anselm's atonement anyway soo I have nothing to say on that lol
Thank you for having a brilliant mind open to challenge. I'm a Christian that has grappled with is exact issue and have never made peace with it. I love who Jesus was but the who savior thing.. not so much.
he is a snotnosed kid , Barth Ehrman is much much better and Gary Habermas is great if you like the opposite opinion which is the right one obviously
@@travelsouthafrica5048 "he is a snotnosed kid"... "the opposite opinion which is the right one obviously"
I was raised with all of this, even studied at seminary, and recently left it all once I could no longer paper over the contradictions and Cruelty of this theology.
Initially I was going to call out some pretty major omissions in your overview, but then I realized: your larger points are valid and important. I want to highlight, for example, your comment regarding children growing up desiring death: these teachings taught me, from as early as I can remember, that death is something to be both yearned for but also impossibly afraid of (since we're told that it's so easy to condemn ourselves to hell).
Also, your closing point about the sophistry required to navigate these theological jumbles is spot on.
Thanks Alex my faith has been strengthened.
Hi CosmicSkeptic, random internet Christian here. Love your content! And please don’t, because I’m a Christian, interpret what I’m saying as “oh look a Christian just trying to LOOK LIKE he loves his enemies like he’s told to do.” I genuinely really enjoy your videos. They have been inspiring me to do proper research into the whole theism vs atheism debate but also to question and look into the validity behind my own beliefs, which I think we all must do! Enjoyed your debate with a Frank Turek a couple years ago too, considering doing a masters in apologetics myself :) Keep researching and I would personally say let’s be committed to the pursuit of truth. Wishing you all the best
I enjoyed your comment
I am an atheist and I like your comment
Like your mindset.
@@missingsig I think we all must judge our own beliefs at some point. Self-awareness prevents ignorance and delusion! :)
Genuine question: how are you still Christian?
I was tormented with the idea that I deserved to go to hell as a child and it filled me with self loathing that I still struggle with today. Even now, I feel like I'm so vile that I deserve to be among worst of the worst in hell. I consciously remind myself that this is irrational, but the feeling still lingers. He's right about that being one of the most cruel things you could tell a child. The one good thing to come of it is that I haven't indoctrinated my own child.
have you considered that perhaps its not that you "deserve" to go to hell, it is a case that hell is our DEFAULT destination?
Sounds horrible doesn't it? yep, we ARE drowning. and yet call the God that offers us a life saving jacket and YANK us out of the water at the end of days evil is a mystery to me.
Thats why the GOSPEL (the Good NEWS) is such good news.
Seek God. and Trust in Jesus.
@@kaizze8777 Of course I don't deserve to go to hell, literally no one deserves to go there. It's our default position because God decided it should be that way even for good people. Reframe it however you want, God made Hell with the intention of having good people sent there for failure to credulously grovel.
In your analogy, God is the one who threw me out to drown. He's threatening me with eternal torture if I don't do what he wants. That's abusive, emotionally, psychologically, and physically. Further, it destroys morality by endorsing vicarious redemption. It says you don't have to take responsibility for your wrongs because an innocent person was tortured to death for you. The despot may demand on penalty of eternal anguish that I must accept this. I will not. It's an abomination.
The actual traditional view is simply that hell is the presence of God. Ultimately though we are quite sinful, but what you are describing is despair, not repentence which isn't good for obvious reasons. As hell is the presence of God then it simply depends upon if you have attempted to move towards God through working with him (synergeia). Salvation is thusly a process were you become more and more like God without becoming God.
It's not about going there because you're "failing". The whole point is that as long as one has faith, you will be saved. So what does that mean? That you must have a strong intellectual belief to go to heaven? No of course not. Faith is in this sense not an intellectual belief, faith is putting one's trust in God and working together with him. You may recognize that you are a sinner and that you should improve, but you do not sit there and grovel in your sins. You fall down, dust yourself off and continue.
If anything, despair is almost what hell is in many ways.
@@callefolin To say "the traditional view" is misleading because there are many different traditions and some definitely include an eternal hell of anguish. There are also different traditions on heaven, salvation, repentance, etc. To claim only yours is correct is to commit a clear no true Scotsman fancy. The only way to determine the correct view of things is for God to show up and provide a demonstration, but we all know that isn't happening. You can't just brush away other people's religious traditions by saying they aren't THE traditional view. I really don't need the religious to continue condescending to me about how I don't actually understand anything because I wasn't brought up with their version of the "real" Christianity.
What I'm describing is psychological abuse perpetuated against a child by otherwise good people who were corrupted by religion. Repentance was obviously part of my indoctrination as well, but that part wasn't relevant to the comment. It's not like all our church services centered on us bewailing the existence of hell. Children don't always take away only the message you want them to take away. They wanted me to feel happy that Jesus had come to save us and so we didn't need to fear hell anymore. I highly doubt their intention was that I should focus on the part of the doctrine that said its inherently what I deserve.
I know people don't go there for failing. That's part of the horror of it all. Simply by being a human, I'm condemned because my very biology makes it literally impossible to meet God's demands. You hit the nail on the head. "As long as one has faith, you will be saved." It isn't about being a good person, bettering the world, helping your fellow man, a person can do all that and God still decides they're worthy of hell. Reverse wise, a person can be a monster, raping and murdering, defrauding and stealing, manipulating and lying, then find faith at the end and God finds them deserving of heaven. It rather destroys the idea of moral accountability, particularly in the only life that we actually know we have.
I know you meant hell is the absence of god, but the fact that you twice wrote that it's the presence of God gave me a real chuckle. In a lot of ways, I think the eternal presence of god would be hell for some people.
@@kaizze8777 Lmao, I don't the religious hoard who actually are like can, from this comment onward, claim they *aren't* mentally depraved lunatic cultists.
Very thought provoking! Thank you
Sorry to hear that.
Nice video, thanks. Interesting that so much thought goes into a bronze age myth.
Everyone poops.
Everyone sins.
Sins = poops.
- My Theology PhD
...lol, exactly!
Yeah except that's sadly not how a conclusion works
Lynx rufus woooosh
@@plants_before_people5329 - That's OK. It makes as much sense as theological logic.
@@spinav8r guess you're right about that, lol
It's goning to be nice when we can eventually quote "secular theologist Alex O'Conner". 🤣
@Rawlings There are rational Alex O'Connor fans, having fun discussions. And then there are you Alex Jones fans...
@Rawlings I think you're confusing us with the fake liberals who pretend to be atheist... you'll find them under virtue signaling videos.
@Rawlings
The fact that you throw around insults and generalizations make it harder to take you seriously.
@@stylis666
You may be free to go against your conscience, but that doesn't mean your conscience doesn't start bothering you after choosing to do so.
So how free are you really to go against your conscience?
Wow... Rawlings here has an ego the size of Darth Dawkins. Good to know that the whole 'humility thing that Christians claim is so important is so strongly represented among apologists, right?
Just fascinating.
More of this sort of thing.
Would greatly appreciate anything on the English mystics.
I really believe the quickest way to become an atheist is to learn about world religions and to study theology teachings. I once was asked by a couple of JW (they always seem to travel in pairs) why I was an atheist, hadn’t I read the Bible? My response dumb founded them, “it was reading the Bible that helped me become an atheist.” “Really” was their response. They said they would pray for me. I found their response amusing. So far their prays have had no affect. I wish I had had your questions to ask Jehovah Witness back then, perhaps it could have lead to a more interesting and extended dialog, but then, not likely.
JWs have their own book, anyway.
1 Church believes ignorance to be a virtue.
Is that so everywhere in the Ecumenical Church? Is it still the case?
Have alternative societies were fallen into the same error? Like Communism, for instance, no?
2 Tree of knowledge means scientific knowledge, according to you? The full name is the Tree of knowledge good and evil". Maybe that allegory you provided wasn't what the Bible meant. If Christian Church is inherently opposite to science, why than Christians studied Aristotle?
3 Establishing the death penalty for eating from the three. Was there any other way for God to provide an autonomous creature with the ability to become God? Was it just an arbitrary decision, or a necessity?
4 First people never existed? Why is it because evolution is collective? But, was there a non-human ape who had born the first fully human?
@@catholicmilitaryassociationthey don't. They made their own translation however.
Jehovahs are not Christians ☦️
yeah but you ignore those 3 odd bad ones and religion suddenly is a very wholesome thing. its not the fault of religion that we took the 3 least usefull and made them so popular that we mixup religion with abrahameic madness.
god is the antagonist and the protagonist of the story so he makes a problem and fixes it and wants praise for fixing the shit that he broke in the first place.
God is a dumbass , I guess.
God is basically me tbh
Sounds like Trump.
I think that this is pretty profound and I pretty much agree. Suffering might be a precondition for sentience. That sounds pretty true to me. So god is to blame for our suffering, true. I remember when my daughter was born, I realized that I had to take responsibility for everything, since I helped bring her into this world. I never expected praise from her, but I yearned for her love, freely given. At least this metaphor works for me.
@@animealpha4795 He's a drama queen.
It's interesting to learn the process by which, Man created God.
Check out my content
Did you tried "Sapiens: A brief history of humankind" by Yuval Harari?
@Rawlings The same way J.R.R. Tolkien created Lord of the Rings.
Earth created humans, then humans used intuition to create the GODS. Then humans used science to create A.I. How long before we have an anti A.I. Jesus waging a holy war? The gods will battle! 😀
Rawlings bc we make him up, so he exists bc people believe it
I enjoyed this immensely. Thank you. I commend Alice Walker's the colour purple to you.
as someone whos gone to catholic school her whole life, this is incredibly thought provoking
Follower Of Duck, may I be the second Follower Of Duck?
Sir Follower of Duck, may i be the third Follower of Duck?
This guy's a moron. Don't abandon God.
@@phithegamer5787 So because you think he's moron, all his arguments are dismissed?
@@user-wi5gv8gs3e I stopped reading the moment you mentioned annunaki. Get help please
There seems to be a correlation between an education in philosophy and ruffled hair.
Not all people with ruffled hair study philosophy - but all people who study philosophy have ruffled hair.
There certainly is correlation, but is there causation?
Do you have a study showing a correlation between an education in philosophy and ruffled hair?
It's due to the brain boiling inside the head.
It's because they do not let you study philosophy unless you have ruffled hair
I swear: everytime I hear the word entail, I think back to the debate you had with Mohammed Hijab where you asked, "If P entails Q, and P is necessary, is Q necessary" to which he replies, "no" then "it does not have to be." One of the funniest moments of that event
He didn't just say no, he followed by saying "it doesn't have to". So at least be honest. You're proud about a strawman?
That's the funniest moment.
@@Lifeistransitory1 can you give me an example where the statement I quoted is not true?
I kinda laughed at Ineffable right there. Indeed, under what circumstances does it not have to? And besides, how "It doesn't have to" differ from "No" when the question is about matters of necessity?
@@LilVukie
Because Hijab said "its doesn't have to be" You on the other-hand limited Hijabs response to "No".
You do see the difference?
@@AR15ORIGINAL
Keep laughing..the laugh is on you.
That's right its about the necessity of the necessary existent thing. How is what entails also necessary related to the misquote of Hijab.
Comedian.
The forbidden fruit is specifically the knowledge of good and evil, once you realize that evil exists you are doomed.
Well delivered… excellent
To be fair. alex could make a video about arranging his sock draw and i would still watch it.
*drawer
Maybe he should, so you can learn how to spell the damn word...
@@llort147 rude!
@@Leviathan123456 yeah, people suck 😞
You mean a video about arranging the contents of his sock drawer, don't you? :)
It's innacurate to say that the New Testament hadn't been compiled and canonised by the time Athanasius as a broad consensus was already firmly established by the 2nd century, which is evidenced in the Muratorian Canon (yes there are differences in dating) and the decisive response against Marcion's Canon. This was possible because a canon was already liturgically in place (this necessitates compilation) with which one could base ones theological judgements. Yes, certain books had an uncertain status till much later e.g. shepherd of Hermas, Revelation...
Thus Athanasius is not creating a canon in 367, but merely restating the existing Church practice.
Some his writings point to other views of hell such as annihilationism etc. Not only does he not mention that the Saint had different views but it seams the Bible it self does. And he goes over none of them. Just the one he wants a rouse from which is the most extreme case of ECT. And none of the sub views in it.
Yes Anthanasius simply states in his 39th festal letter of the 27 works (NT). This simply shows us that the canon had been formed by 367, because that is the first listing we have.
Impressive. I’m glad Oxford still teaches Theology rather than the cop out Religious Studies, as you are still required to think. For the sake of brevity, I’d suggest an existentialist approach viz the dilemmas described by Athanasius and Anselm are internal conflicts we can all recognize, just as reading Dante is an inner rather than an outer journey. Great work and strength to your efforts.
How is Religious Studies a cop-out?
One of the most evil things about this concept of original sin meant that parents who suffered the tragedy of losing a baby before it could be baptised had to believe that that baby would go to hell until the church invented the udea of limbo, a sort of bleak nowhere.
well i don’t know about catholics, but most non-denominational christians believe in a “free grace when acceptance is impossible” sort of approach, as those who cannot understand the idea of salvation cannot accept the grace of God and are therefore saved through grace because they are not denying the salvation of God.
No, because as far as I know there has always been the belief that babies or children up to a certain age, I think 7 not sure, do not go to hell if they die, they go straight to heaven.
@@madelynhernandez7453 never heard of that. where in the book is this dlc?
@@madelynhernandez7453 The traditional teaching of the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Church is that unbaptized babies go to hell. Now, this is not based on scripture (not even in the slightest), but it is their 'apostolic tradition.'
it comes from saint augustin, however you can disagree on that , protestant do
God: On the day of you eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you will die.
Adam: What does 'die' mean?
God: Oh... err.... It's like... the process of death. Die, dying, dead... y'know? Death.
Adam: What does 'death' mean?
God: Oh right... Of course. Well, it hasn't been invented yet. But I can tell you that death - is not good.
Adam: What does good mean?
God: Oh... right... errrr... Its like... the exact opposite of bad...
Adam: What does 'bad' mean?
God: Err...... It's like, when something... really... um... shit happens... like....
Adam: Like death?
God: Yes! Exactly! Like death.
Adam: So what is death again?
God: Um... Hey... why don't you go and talk to that snake over there...
Complete nonsense from you. If anyone invented something, it's you!
Danyael You're not very bright, are you? 😅
@@llort147
What's that supposed to mean?
pathetic understanding
what God means you will die. is that you are not longer immortal and not welcome in the garden bcoz the garden is like heaven. sin do not belong in heaven. sadly ur poor understanding is laughable
Look forward to watching you dissect Mohammad Hijabs snake oil array.
Didn't you mean MooHamMad Shitjab?
PJ oh golly your racism is showing 😬
ooooh your passive-aggressive hard-on for Christianity is showing.
He had round 1 wrt his determinism and got flattened. He'll have to do better....
Any one of you atheists interested to debate on the existence of God?
Great video, I thought it was fascinating and disturbing, I like it
Thanks that was great!
I found myself silent clasping for a second when you said you finished your first year. I’m happy for you! And in Oxford no less.
I saw CosmicSceptic on the street of Oxford week or two ago. He looked like a normal person... just going about doing regular people stuff!
Didn't dare to approach and now regretting it a bit.
Anyway you are awesome CosmicSceptic!
Yes people do things that people do, amazing but true.
This reminds me of one very special evening when I saw Peter Rabbit... At first glance, I thought he was just a regular rabbit, doing regular rabbit things.. eating clover, with an “ear” on his surroundings. I asked “hey, are you a regular rabbit, doing normal rabbit things like eating clover in the evening?” He glanced at me, turned, and released a few droppings. I knew at that moment that this was no regular rabbit! I thought of asking him some important rabbit questions that only Peter rabbit would know.. But I was so afraid he would think me rude; or worse, particularly insipid for imposing my rabbit queries on perhaps the most famous Peter of all time. I think of that day every time I am forced to eat a salad. Or have a loose stool.
@@marklandis5794 loose stools? easily fixed with a good quality screwdriver and the liberal application of glue.
Maybe he is a normal person!?
Mark - Very good! HAHAHA.
I'm a former Anglican priest, and trained in Oxford. It was an experience that was both wonderful and ghastly. I'm the last person in the world to defend the Church, but I think you give an incomplete picture here in a few places - particularly the nuances of the differences in the concept of Original Sin between Eastern and Western traditions. (Briefly and crudely, the Eastern tradition takes a less personal and more cosmic view.)
Can you expand on this? Your prospective as an former priest is probably very unique. I’d also like to know how and why you left your position if you want to talk about it.
(I’m Giovanni, I’m 27, Italian, atheist, but I love this subject)
In the East, original sin is rejected, but they understand that we are sinners because we are born into a sinful world. Kids learn to steal, be selfish, etc. This is consistent with Athanasius.
Homie who made the video is applying later theological categories onto the text. He doesn’t really put forward a theory of original sin (although based on what he writes, if someone described it to him I think he’d accept it wholeheartedly) but rather sees sin and death as powers at work in the human race. After sin enters the world, death does as well, and it affects all who are touched by the power of sin. So it’s not about inherited guilt (that’s a category developed about 100 years later by Augustine) but about these powers that are at work in our bones
I grew up (Syrisc) Orthodox Christian, and some of the things mentioned (especially from Athanasius) were taught to me without dilution
I believe in hell, I've been to gary indiana.
I believe in hell, it was called:
"Grave of the Fireflies"
"Starwars Sequel Trilogy"
"Steven Universe"
Yatter Yatter Yatter...
can't be that bad, can it? have you been to Newark, NJ?
I've heard about Gary. I think it has most amount of crime in the US?
“Hell is other people” - Sartre
I live in Arizona. Hell is real!
"For God is not the author of confusion..."
Confusion seems to have been the author of God.
:D
.....
:D :D :D
@@OctyabrAprelya yes, but just as we leave aside shoes that are small or worn-out religion, too, should be treated as such.
@Joshua K
What are you confused about? Would you like me to explain it to you?
@@j0hncon5tantine What are you not confused about? Do you think you really have explanations?
@Emily Barclay Thanks, I am aware of that :D This is, in fact, exactly my point.
@@OctyabrAprelya is this like a flat earth thing. Like they said, earth must be flat, cuz I haven't seen the other side
All kinds of f*cked up. Great work, thanks.
To your point at 8:45, I remember thinking the same as a child. I figured if Heaven existed and was the best thing ever then why was everyone in our church not just killing themselves right now? I also figured that it was better to do it sooner than later cuz being a kid I would be a shoe-in for Heaven. Related to that, I was also terrified of dying of old age. I knew that when people got old their brains stopped working and they couldn’t remember things or think properly. In most media spirits are shown as how the person was when they died, so I was scared of being stuck as senile for all eternity basically.
as a child....your position is certainly that of a child. Anyone aware of heaven is likely to have heard of the commandments, one of which is 'you shall not kill', including yourself. Heaven in the Christian sense is intellectual enlightenment, not senility. Check Boethius and Aquinas.
@@philcoppa "Heaven in the Christian sense is intellectual enlightenment, not senility." Sorry, but we disagree on that one. And quoting two Christian men doesn't change that. I have a brain that works.
@@philcoppa even if they shouldn’t Jill themselves, the mentality would definitely rally you against safety and self preservation, which isn’t a great idea to teach children.
I think suicide is frowned upon and considered a bad thing since life is God's gift so you taking your life away is rejecting God's gift so why should you be given free pass to Heaven that way.
@@B30pt87 Actually in theory, heaven is great. For Christians it means immortality, the lack of death, sickness and decay, reunion with loved ones, and endless access to knowledge and the universe. It is enlightenment in the sense that only will there be spiritual closeness with their Creator but also unlocking the secrets of knowledge that men know nothing about. We only just found out about many things in science, and there is much more yet to be discovered. And before you say, science/knowledge and religion do not mix please remember that the reason many are literate today is because of religion especially during the years of the Reformation, and that MUCH of the information that scientists study and utilize today, that are taught in schools, were contributed by religious people who believed in the God of the Bible. There are brilliant aethists but there are also brilliant theists, and belief in God or a diety does not equal dumb.
I envy your studies in Oxford, slightly. All the best for you! Hope you'll find everything you are looking for!
I'm curious, are most students that study theology with you atheists, or at least agnostics as well just like you or are you just a rare example?
My friend and roommate at uni studied Theology and said that the majority were Catholics or otherwise Christian, a couple of people of other religions and then a couple of atheists / agnostics. Don't know what it's like in Alex's class but that's what she experienced.
@@katie6384 Interesting. I would've assumed that there would be more atheists since this generation becomes more atheistic overall. Cool to know tho!
I study theology and it's mostly Christians :/ they seems to be the only people interested in talking about god
@@JohnCena8351 Yeah I would have thought that as well, although I think Catholic priests are strongly encouraged to take degrees in Theology, and maybe Christian ministers as well so maybe that explains the disproportionate demographic breakdown.
@@katie6384 Interestingly, Charles Darwin had a degree in Christian theology.
I've happened upon Anselm before and had Christians have all sorts of negative reactions to his philosophies. In the stuff you describe, it really comes across as him attempting to erase worry and unnecessary fear for what is "Beyond".
Great video
The reading lists are really helpful - please keep posting them as you continue on your course. Whilst I live and think on the opposite end of the religious/theological spectrum, I appreciate the articulate and intelligent way that you express what you've studied. Good luck with your studies in the future!
As a person who's lived in a Catholic environment (I'm atheist btw) all his life, the first theory seemed pretty normal to me having been exposed to that for 20 years hahaha
Wow that's a trip, I grew up as a Christian but not Catholic, I don't remember original sin being talked about really
@@heedmydemands Original Sin was probably the first thing we were taught... in MIDDLE SCHOOL in Eastern Europe (Orthodox Christians...). My catholic friends know about it too, but it could be a local thing(Romania)... curious
@@joanabug4479 yeah that's interesting. Like I was told the Adam and Eve story and Eve was tempted by the serpent and ate of the tree of knowledge but it wasn't made a big deal. I don't remember more being said about it than that story. We were all assumed sinners, I just thought it was because no one is perfect not that we were guilty when we were born
Catholics don't go as hard at this "hereditary sin" thing as protestants do though. As a chaplaine once told me (I'm also from a Catholic background), one of the main central differences between catholics and protestants is that catholics believe that due to Jesus dying for our sins, humans are now born without sin and can thereby be happy. Directly after the sacrament of penance they are actually viewed as completely free of sin. Protestants on the other hand believe that humans are still born with sin and thereby need to spend their lifes doing penance constantly and will always remain sinners. Martin Luther was rejected by many catholic theologians not only because he disagreed with the sale of indulgences but also because his theology was too bleak for them.
Of course, I still think that catholic theology is still horrific, though. It's just not as bad in that regard.
I was raised Catholic and we were taught about original sin all the time. I thought it was pretty normal for a Christian upbringing. I didn't take it to mean that we're all inherently evil, just that we are imperfect and we all desire to do things that God does not want us to do. I really don't think it's that big of a deal or DISGUSTING as the title of this video suggests. As an atheist now I can still accept the theory behind it. Human beings are flawed and do immoral things to each other that's the reality of life whether you put a religious spin on it or not.
Brilliant video
'total corruption' sounds like Calvin. Not all Christians agree. Original sin merely means sin goes back to the origin, it's not something we commit. It is something we suffer from - darkness in the intellect, weakness in the will. We are not as bright as we might be and we don't have a lot of willpower.
Thank you, Alex, for explaining Anselm's theology with such clarity. Good luck with your exams.
5:41
*_Alex:_*_ Have you ever heard..._
*_My brain:_*_ the tragedy of Darth Plagueis the Wise?_
*_Alex:_*_ of anything more cruel and disgusting?_
Yes.
This. This.
As an atheist, I feel studying religion is important to learn to avoid it in the "should we never let this happen again" thinking like we study any holocaust. Religion as a whole seems to create so much brain and mental damage to its victims. It gets you to act harm to yourself all the while telling you it is your fault and you deserve it.
How? Explain your point further please and continue on with your research, I think it will be very fruitful for you!
I hope you also study communism just as closely, considering all the bloodshed that system, firmly rooted in atheism, has caused.
yes. but at the same time it has created much peace, justice, forgiveness, beauty, art, advancement throughout the ages and to this day still is a profound source of hope, love, strength and compassion for millions of people...
belief, in the widest sense of the word, has driven humanity since the very beginning.
let's keep studying religion critically, let's uncover its flaws, dangers and the damage that has been wrought through it - but just going "religion = bad" is an unjust distortion of the truth.
Thank you thinking about Athanasius and your atheistic view was really fun! I can´t wait for university!
Why God creates man ?
th-cam.com/video/CdXcjZLI-88/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Mp9nO1iU-aBGporR
“It’s a tough sport” 🤣🤣
Wow, wasn't expecting you here! Lol.
Always nice to see random channels you love appear in other channels you love.
Love the channel . This kind of content is really important. Provides context to a lot of the wider themes discussed on the channel. Fair play man
Sixteen years of Catholic education. My problem was that I used the gift that God gave me, the gift of Reason. When I asked Why? I was told to just believe. I had many of the questions he raised but I never got answers. The only thing I did get a big dose of was Guilt. Guilt for everything, even a passing thought was enough to send me to eternal damnation. After watching a huge number of videos of NDEs I realize that it is going to be OK. Do your best, correct your mistakes and love as many people as possible.
"Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth; and God has placed in the human heart a desire to know the truth-in a word, to know himself-so that, by knowing and loving God, men and women may also come to the fullness of truth about themselves" - Pope John Paul II in his encyclical, Fides et Ratio.
Those who did not engage your rational questions did wrong. The Church however embraces reason. A resource I'd recommend is Catholic Answers - they engage arguments with reason and really dive into the "why." I especially recommend Jimmy Akin and Trent Horn. The answers to your questions are out there my friend. The people who refused to engage your questions or at least point you in the right direction are not representative of Catholicism. Take care.
Alex, I loved the clarity of your discussion of a complex topic. Whatever directions you take in your studies at Oxford and after (whether in academia or not, I can see you will be a life-long learner) people are always going to benefit from having conversations with you.
The more I learn about this stuff, the more I can’t believe I actually believed it.
then stop wasting your energy, if its consuming so much of you, oh there's a new religion,YOU.
@@Fish-vs6jf enjoying Cosmic Skeptic videos is a waste of energy?? Nahhh.
Well said, friend.
@@Fish-vs6jf go flop around on the ground like a fish out of water.
Me too. ...Me too.
I’m a theology student at Charles University, thank you very much for posting your reading list
Such well selected and nicely presented commentaries. I so appreciate your demeanor and temperament in this video as well-a gently suave modesty that conveys sincere respect for the audience and compassion for those who’ve been brutalized through the ages by spiritual narcissism and other abuses. Speaking of which, I’m excited to see there’s a video on Jordan Peterson. I certainly hope you’re keeping a sufficiently hedonic balance to your intellectual and worldly life to stay afloat. I would assume no less.
Thanks 🙏🏽
Your channel randomly came up on my feed. I have a Master of Divinity built around the pursuit of a PhD, but alas, life happened.
I've been looking for educated, erudite, non-reactive unbelieving fellow travelers in unbelief. I found your analysis spot on, a clear systematic dismantling of the logical and illogical fallacies that buttress "faith," an enterprise that is either brutish and cruel or absolutely unnecessary.
I look forward to further engagement!
This is like Mark Wahlberg's character in The Other Guys learning ballet just to make fun of ballerinos
Not at all. When people perform ballet, it hurts nobody. When Christians use their theology to create laws and social policy, it has consequences for everyone, so it is important to point out their "facts" are not facts at all.
I understood the reference, and I appreciated it as an Other Guys fan. 😀
If, on the other hand, he was to criticize Christianity while not being in possession of all the facts, you would accuse him of not being qualified to argue. You can't have it both ways. What the hell is a ballerino?
@@tcrown3333 A male ballerina? Lol Idk
Dude that reference is hilarity. Underrated
Thanks for the catch up and respect for the torture you put yourself through with this BS
12:00 The compensation here sounds like thermodynamics lol.
There's always some energy loss, always a little bit of "debt" to repay into any system.
Years ago I came across Dr. David Neill Klotz and his book , in German published titeled as: "Das aramäische Vaterunser"
and in a larger outlining " Der Prophet, der aus der Wüste kam". I can highly recommend both of them.
This was yet another one of your GREAT videos, where you so eloquently, intelligently and honestly share with us all your knowledge. You didn't have to, yet you did share that with us, so thank you. Which makes me even more sad seeing the comment section filled with either christian apologetics or people who totally missed the point of the video and just make silly jokes...
That’s what you would see, as the comment section is and will be censored.
It's like eternally thanking god for putting out the fire that HE purposely started in the first place.
As an atheist, you are not qualified or capable of being a competent theologian. I will be praying for you.
Well theres a few presuppositions that are had in order to make this assertion.
The first, and most self indulgent one is that IF there is a god that created all of existance, and ascribes all meaning including moral meanings(entertain the premise for argument) then it makes no sense to think you, a portion of the created existance, has a right to tell the creator how to do things, or what should be considered right, or wrong. At the end of the day, your one person out of countless generations, with limited experience in your own life, let alone the knowledge it would entail to be the literall source of everything.
The second thing is more a prospect to do with doctrine we have now.
And that is that its stated in the video that we were made to be immortal, and happy. Which is just wrong.
Pretty much all of christian doctrine says the primary purpous of our creation was that we were supposed to share in agency with god over creation, and to be someone, and something to talk to/have a meaningful relationship with.
The fall of man is the result of humans abandoning that purpous to pursue purposes of our own design.
In light of that it makes a little more sense that there would be a toll for sin.
After all if a computer stopped working properly, and you couldn't have it fixed, youed probably throw it away. Or at least scrap it for parts.
The computer was created to fulfill a purpousand now cannot do so.
@@barryallen2123 as a athiest he is perfectly capable of being a theologian. Unlike his Christian colleagues he is untainted by doctrine. Try praying for the weak and unfeed of this world and not a well educated young man.
Hell is a discussionpoint even within christianity
@@anthonypolonkay2681 But we aren't computers, why did he then give us "free will" to make our own choices and already knew what our choices would be to purposely accuse us of not doing what he asked us to do?... I see it this way. I'm god, I create billions of humans and I put them in an insignificant rock within a vast univers and I tell them: I'm your creator, I give you the ability to choose, I want you all to love me and worship me... but if you decide no to do so I will subjugate you all to an eternal existence of torture and suffering... but I'm an old loving god, by the way. I created this whole reality, but I will get offended if you don't go to church every week and worship me... THAT'S WAY TOO SADISTIC AND CHILDISH
I'm literally nothing compared to the entire univers, yet he seems to get too overly offended if I don't do what he tells me to do (and I don't kill, I always try to be honest, I'd say I'm a very loving friend and family member... so what's the point?) xd that's ridiculous.
I read Theology under C.K. Barrett at Durham (from Michaelmas 1978 through the end of Trinity Term 1981- I matriculated after 2 years in Bedfordshire doing my A-Levels as an American agnostic born in Hollywood CA-all my tutors & professors read Theology at either Oxford or Cambridge so your video ‘brings me back’ …
You of course are still an ‘undergraduate at Oxford’ so any over-generalisations can easily be forgiven - for example one would be hard-press’d to make Athanasius of Alexandria a 3rd century bishop (he was born c. 293 CE but was active as a writing theologian in the first half of the 4th century - a little like calling Rossini & Schubert ‘18th century composers…’ !!!
Athanasius’ contribution to ‘Pauline Christian Orthodoxy’ of course cannot be denied but one would have to stretch your mind back to the time of Bishop Iranaeus of Lyons (active c. 160-180 CE) to see the actual formation of ‘Orthodox Pauline Christianity’ which in his writings lay out a good chunk of what beliefs & tenets of the ‘Pauline Christian Churches’ had to contend with-mainly as a reaction to the forceful effect of (the arch Pauline) Marcion the wealthy ship-owning son of the Bishop of Sinope who in July 144 CE address’d a council of presbuteroi in Rome arguing many of the points later written down in his infamous anti Semitic book ‘Contradictions’ (‘Antitheses’) -wherein YHWH the sole postExilic clan-god of the Jews was regarded as an evil Demiurge who created this imperfect & filthy world quite apart from the ‘higher God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ’ having found it necessary violently to ‘cut out any Jewish Tanakh references in Paul’s letters’ -and also proposed a ‘list of books that were divinely inspir’d to be read in the churches’ which did not include the Old Testament at all…
So when Iranaeus began to compile ‘Adversus Haereses’ & his own version of ‘The Didache of the Apostles’ he was in fact laying down the groundwork for later Pauline Christian Orthodoxy which was nearly 100 years later taken up by Athanasius & other bishops after him…
There are a number of other clarifications of fact that I could discuss here but this post is already too long for most of your viewers -the vast majority of whom (to judge from some of their wildly jejune comments) seem to suffer from a sort of collective Attention Deficit Syndrome !!! LoL
Well done. You're freeing so many of unnecessary guilt and fear.
Ehmm, not necessary, as you see religion is mainly the embodiment of attitude from masses in each certain societal group. Formed up from their shared values, norm, and law in how to understand their relation with the spirituality, environment, and society by each member. So the core that makes unnecessary guilt and fear will always still be there, because it's within shared socially-constructed consciousness on societal limitation and responsibility, religion is just one of many enforcement for such.
@@williemherbert1456 Huh. That’s interesting, can you tell me more about this topic?
@@williemherbert1456 Whatever. One layer of fear and guilt gone makes for a big difference.
the "guilt and fear" you're talking about is man's understanding and acknowledgement that he is flawed in nature. What man does with that understanding is completely up to him. It is not meant to scare or harm, it gives man a sense of humility and a desire to be and do better. No amount of literary or historical analysis and debate can simply "free" people of their nature. It can quiet the mind for a while and set people on a different path for a long time, sure, but that feeling will always be recurrent, because it is the free will granted to us in our creation that allows us to use our flawed nature for either good or for bad.
@@katalinhorvath655 Well said!
Alex. thank you for the video. The more I read, the more I learn I have to read, and at 48 I still love to learn. That is why I love your channel. You are a man learned beyond your years. Thank you.
Dude, how are you?
Dude, I'm great.
@@CosmicSkeptic
Ay what's with your hair mate?
Good stuff. Good work, stout fellow. Keep up the good fight.
As a believer I found this interesting, makes me want to read more theology.
Well done! Great insight. I appreciate you.
Also, Congrats on graduating, ma dude!
"The tree of knowlede; forbidden, naturally, since the church considers ignorance to be a virtue"
Beautifully said.
@XY ZW fine. I'll bite the bullet. What does it refer to? And what was its purpose other than ultimately punishing every human to ever come for something god knew in advance?
I am not a biblical scholar but from what i know the tree of knowledge was a metaphor for not to play god. As in deciding who lives and dies etc. Also knowledge is said to be one of the gifts of the holy spirit. I have never heard any catholic accademic endorse the view that ignorance was a virtue.
cbren my question is: how does eating an apple give anyone the power to decide who lives and who dies?
@@ValoPlay724 as i said its a metaphor. Prior to reading and writing people learned via stories via the oral tradition.
cbren that is not taught is any church establishment, nor does it make much sense.
Excellent