Can I still use the QM method if I start with an arbitrary DNF rather than a sum of minterms? I could expand any DNF to a sum of minterms, but that might be exponentially explosive, and exorbitant if the number of variables is large.
do you mean with don't cares? In those cases the first steps are exactly the same, treat the don't cares as minterms. Then when you get to the prime implicant chart, don't include the don't cares.
Thanks! Very well laid out explanation and thanks for also covering Petrick's method.
Man, you have done a hell of a job. You are not only good, but surpass anybody's expectations. YOU ARE DE BEST!!!
That was a really complete lecture about Q-M method that also included Q-m with dont cares, I appreciate the effort for making this video.
Great explanation, covering all the hidden stuff which always happens to be after reading basic rules.
Last-minute Saver .....Awesome keep uploading
You are a very talented tutor, great lecture thx.
Excellent explanation ❤️❤️👍
Thanks. I was finally able to understand McCluskey's method thanks to your explanation.
Excellent rendition
thank you sir a lot. There is a midterm tomorrow and your tutorial has wide range of covarege of the concept. Thank you a lot one more time.
Much more clear compared to the textbook. This is why word choice is real important for instruction
Finally understood it! Thanks so much!
amazing thank you, 9 years later
Thanks for the clarity
Thanks! your lecture gave me a lot of help!
+Dae Young KIM Glad to help!
Is there any videos in your,channel about simple automatics (calculating the parameters of the regulators like pi and pid )
23:28 isn't 6,7 missing? 6 is 110, 7 is 111, they differ only in the LSB, so it would be 11-
nvm, just as i hit send you uncovered it
i salute you sir
Thank you so much!!!!
Thanks for the help, really god explanation
Wow, A God explanation!!
이걸 보게 될 줄이야.
Can I still use the QM method if I start with an arbitrary DNF rather than a sum of minterms? I could expand any DNF to a sum of minterms, but that might be exponentially explosive, and exorbitant if the number of variables is large.
How to do it with undefined cases
do you mean with don't cares? In those cases the first steps are exactly the same, treat the don't cares as minterms. Then when you get to the prime implicant chart, don't include the don't cares.
@@rickycastles1510 thanks this is really helpful ❤❤
Mr Ricky Castles ... very good movie ...
tANKS !**!
der hammer