The T-90m Is A Controversial Addition To War Thunder That Disappoints

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @atlasrowe864
    @atlasrowe864 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Everyone over hyped the T90m meanwhile the 2a7 and Strv 122B+ just quietly slipped by and started taking over the game.

  • @wotwott2319
    @wotwott2319 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "one shot on the lower front plate taking out the entire crew" has been my experience with all russian mbts honestly. I dunno why the armor only works when I'm not the one using it.

    • @ishitrealbad3039
      @ishitrealbad3039 ปีที่แล้ว

      has also my go too for fighting most NATO tanks.

  • @MareWT
    @MareWT ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Strv 122B+ and Leo 2A7AV are better in every way than T-90M.
    Faster, small weakspots, better reverse, survivable etc etc.
    I reliably one tapped T-90Ms quite a few times but sometimes Strv can take more than 4 rounds to kill because that one crew member won't die no matter what and then when he replenishes crew or finishes repair snaps back and kills you with pretty good APFSDS. DM53 is even better

    • @dankaloww1067
      @dankaloww1067 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Strv 122B+ weak point is smaller not really for the Leopard 2A7V. Since upper glacis is quite easy to hit and its an instant 1 shot if done right.
      T-90M is a good addition. I don't know why people complain so much, (Its almost like they're projecting the notion that Russia should always be weak and none competitive)
      Maybe its a one sided world view of no Duality.

    • @zeffy._440
      @zeffy._440 ปีที่แล้ว

      I usually one shot both the 2A7V and Strv122B+ their weakpoints are massive frontlly speaking

    • @M0LOCK
      @M0LOCK ปีที่แล้ว

      Both STRV and 2A7 have much more weakspots than the T90M or even the BVM...and stop with the "muh reverse" bs,just find better terrain mf

  • @ghostpcab
    @ghostpcab ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just wait to they add the t-80bvm 2023 i bet people be upset about that as well and it has a 12 mph rev speed

  • @YupItsMack
    @YupItsMack ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When i was playing this in the Dev Server, it honestly felt like a great contender to the BVM, but when the live server came out, the nerfed the "armor quality" so now it just feels like a slower (and somehow weaker) BVM that makes you think you can play aggro, but the second you do, you get bitch slapped

  • @topbanana.2627
    @topbanana.2627 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey whats the tank sight you use in the first clip? Thanks

    • @ChipsAhoyMcCoy
      @ChipsAhoyMcCoy  ปีที่แล้ว

      Here's all the mods that I use. th-cam.com/video/UXpOl01RuyM/w-d-xo.html

    • @topbanana.2627
      @topbanana.2627 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh shit thanks@@ChipsAhoyMcCoy

  • @namkhanhng1802
    @namkhanhng1802 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That sight looks good, where do you get it?

    • @ChipsAhoyMcCoy
      @ChipsAhoyMcCoy  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Here are all of the mods that I use for WT. th-cam.com/video/UXpOl01RuyM/w-d-xo.html

  • @thril1677
    @thril1677 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    link 4 custom sight?

    • @ChipsAhoyMcCoy
      @ChipsAhoyMcCoy  ปีที่แล้ว

      Here is all of the mods that I use. th-cam.com/video/UXpOl01RuyM/w-d-xo.html

  • @wifi_soldier5076
    @wifi_soldier5076 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the T-90 Burlak will be the real game changer. The better 125mm used on the T-14 Armata and a hard kill active protection system.

    • @TheKaMeLRo
      @TheKaMeLRo ปีที่แล้ว +2

      no, I think T-80 Burlak , there is a photo of it

    • @krzysztof3813
      @krzysztof3813 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Burlak is an turret that can be mounted on any MBT it's not only for t80

    • @wifi_soldier5076
      @wifi_soldier5076 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @krzysztof3813 all the photos of it are on the T-72/T-90 you can tell by the wheels.

  • @ishitrealbad3039
    @ishitrealbad3039 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it's a cool tank but i don't see myself grinding for it and using it, considering that the BVM is just flat out better.
    I'm a russian main, and not being able to reverse like with the T72 has gotten me killed A LOT.

  • @temong0long054
    @temong0long054 ปีที่แล้ว

    The crazy thing is that it was supposed to have APS but due to sanctions and lack of the necessary resources they fortunately weren't able to. So helicopter and ATGM users have fun pounding that armor.

  • @ipletikosicr
    @ipletikosicr ปีที่แล้ว

    that sight looks nice, does anyone know where can I download it from?

    • @ChipsAhoyMcCoy
      @ChipsAhoyMcCoy  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Here's all of the mods that I use. th-cam.com/video/UXpOl01RuyM/w-d-xo.html

    • @ipletikosicr
      @ipletikosicr ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ChipsAhoyMcCoy thank you very much!

  • @jackwalters5506
    @jackwalters5506 ปีที่แล้ว

    The reason its top speed is the same because that is determined by the transmission, which has not changed from the previous models(Russia is allergic to reverse speed)

    • @ChipsAhoyMcCoy
      @ChipsAhoyMcCoy  ปีที่แล้ว

      From what I've heard the reverse speed is low so that they can get more torque which allows the tank to get itself out of ditches and whatnot without assistance from other vehicles.

  • @petermikus2363
    @petermikus2363 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Honestly yeah i hear everyone complaining how op this thing is but the leo and strv are much stronger id say.
    The way they did the spall liners this update though is bullshit

    • @ChipsAhoyMcCoy
      @ChipsAhoyMcCoy  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've had 3BM60 get eaten by the armor on the lower front plate of the new STRV 122B+.

  • @dmitry8676
    @dmitry8676 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gaijin belives that Merkava 4 doesnt have spall liners and doesnt deserve reload buff yeeaaaahh

    • @prussia4428
      @prussia4428 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually I’m pretty sure they up for open and free sources (not classified ) for merkava spall liners so if you have any unclassified documents

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain ปีที่แล้ว

      @@prussia4428people have been providing like 20+ sources for the Abrams DU armor, DU round, spall liner, and M829A3’s anti-ERA tip but no dice. Gaijin really showing their Russian Bias right now

    • @prussia4428
      @prussia4428 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Iden_in_the_Rain yeah, in the dev blog it seems like they’re willing to give the merkava spall liners but nothing to the abrams which is why they t Abrams reload

    • @mmneaapro596
      @mmneaapro596 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Iden_in_the_Rain the thing is
      RedEffect did a video about that abrams problem
      and in the documents provided which was sourcing from another document
      it was said only 5 experimental abrams were made with DU

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mmneaapro596 the thing is that RedEffect made the exact same mistake as Gaijin and didn’t look at the amended license barely half a year later that allowed for unlimited DU hulls. RedEffect barely did any research seeing how the amended document was already on the forums for several weeks at the time of the videos release

  • @erebus9702
    @erebus9702 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice vid! :) thanks for making content

  • @billlhooo6485
    @billlhooo6485 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah gaijin believe that Abram tank didn't have hull armor lol.

    • @ChipsAhoyMcCoy
      @ChipsAhoyMcCoy  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm putting off my SepV2 review in the hopes that Gaijin will eventually fix it.

    • @prussia4428
      @prussia4428 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ChipsAhoyMcCoymaybe they’ll fix it by Christmas?

    • @zeffy._440
      @zeffy._440 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gaijin is right that it never had DU front hull armor the evidence US mains gave literally proved it

  • @TheAngriestGamer.
    @TheAngriestGamer. ปีที่แล้ว

    im am both supprised and glad it didnt get the DU 3bm59 like most of us feared. it would not be fun to fight this already unkillable BS mobile with something that has 150mm more pen than 3bm60

  • @ricardoricardoricardoricardo
    @ricardoricardoricardoricardo ปีที่แล้ว

    I have it and feel Im handicaping myself playing it over the BVM. Still 80% wr tho.

  • @Mr.DalekLK
    @Mr.DalekLK ปีที่แล้ว

    Because in the real world, the T 90M is a big disappointment

  • @user-ds7px5em2e
    @user-ds7px5em2e ปีที่แล้ว

    Man it's ridiculous how the wt community complains about Russian mbts saying they are Biased, have you ever played with the t80? It's the most ridiculous shit in the game, it's literally a walking bomb, you can shoot anywhere frontally and it will automatically be obliterated, the other day I shot 4~5 into the side of a leo2a7 and it didn't kill him, how? just how? I was about 100 meters away, as a Soviet player with more than 1000 games in the top USSR I can say that the t80bvm is complete rubbish with the current apfsds. And frontally he is worse than Leo, currently the most prominent tank.

    • @ChipsAhoyMcCoy
      @ChipsAhoyMcCoy  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounding like you're having a skill issue my guy.

  • @XnarozX
    @XnarozX 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its a terrible vehicle, garbage mobility and reload, bvm is still much better but now both arent great compared to 2a7v

  • @thegermanempire489
    @thegermanempire489 ปีที่แล้ว

    they should have just made the 2023 version a upgrade or added it, its the one with a better reverse speed, i think its the T-90MS i believe

    • @pilotmanpaul
      @pilotmanpaul ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's just the T-90M Obr 2023 and no, it does not have better reverse speed. There's no information that backs it up nor confirms such a thing.