Because Switzerland only came in 5th place in televote while being 1st in jury's ranking. Then, it would be up to the number of points that the 4 remaining countries get and if one of them eventually take 1st place.
Yeah but if you are good with maths then you can already tell that no country would be able to pass them by the time it’s the last two countries being announced
This system is kind of unfair for the second and third places because they basically never get the opportunity to be at the top and hope for a victory. Last year it was so exciting to see Käärijä getting 376 points and this year as well I was so happy when Baby Lasagna received his points but with these systems we wouldn't have enjoyed these moments at all because the winners would have already been standing at the top with a colossal number of points and we would have been stressed out whether the televote winner could have surpassed that
Interesting. For me this system gives more attention to the top televote acts. Since we know that they were very sucessfull when there are only 10 or 5 countries left. I think for example for Silvester from Lithuania it would have felt more exiting for him to see that he got in top ten of televote instead of just hearing a two digit number while still many countries to come
@@esc_gabThis! With the current system the jury heavy countries get all the spotlight. They get it during the presentation of the juryvotes, and they get it during the presentation of the televotes, while the countries with low jury scores but high televotes don‘t get the spotlight they deserve. Best moments with the old system included Poland 2016 and Denmark 2018, when they got low jury points but then had that huge FU-moment towards the juries as they got their televotes
@@radeq1710 Yes exactly. You said tele is better than the jury, but the televote had Israel 2nd, and thanks to the jury they did not win, because they ranked them 12th
Looking back, I think the new system, announcing the score according the final of Jury vote, make it a bit more tense' so I am good with the current system. Mind you, you calculate at every point how many points are "left" because the total points, according the current system from the televote are : (number of participate countries+1)*58. Where 58 is the sum of all number between 1 to 8 , plus 10 , plus12.
Malin Åkerman: 0 points to the United Kingdom. 4 points to Norway. 5 points to Austria. 11 points to Spain. 12 points to Slovenia. 13 points to Portugal. 18 points to Germany. 19 points to Georgia. Petra Mede: 20 points to Luxembourg. 28 points to Latvia. 31 points to Finland. 32 points to Serbia. 33 points to Estonia. 44 points to Cyprus. 49 points to Sweden.
Actually according to this system, it's 16 points to Luxembourg, 76 points to Armenia, 82 points to Greece, 103 points to Italy, 129 points to Ireland, 220 points to Switzerland, 225 points to France, 297 points to Ukraine, 311 to Israel and 329 to Croatia. Overall: Luxembourg 99 points (the same position) Armenia 177 points (the same position) Greece 123 points (the same position) Italy 267 points (the same position) Ireland 271 points (the same position) Israel 363 points (the same position) France 443 points (the same position) Ukraine 443 points (the same position)/more points from televote then France Croatia 539 points (the same poistion) Switzerland 585 points (the same position)
the EBU refusing to upload Iolanda’s final performance until it was already too late because she had Palestinian symbols on her nails was going to do that
I imagine there would have been a lot of palpable ohhhhh's in the crowd when Switzerland had their points awarded as "early" as 5th place, like you could be forgiven for assuming they'd be leapfrogged.
@@Shinoroit was pretty boring ngl. Vocals aren't everything. I think I have like 10 or more songs from this year in my playlist and France isn't one of them.
@@Shinoro YOU just said it. A SONG contest, not a voice contest. I'm not saying the song is bad, neither is the performance as a whole. But it's not worthy of winning.
Wait... so we have: 1956 - 2008 only jury voting; 2009 - 2015 old voting system where juryvote and televote are merged; 2016 - 2018 old/modern voting system where countries who received the least televote would be announced first during televote; 2019 - NOW modern voting system where where countries who received the least juryvote vould be announced first during televote I didn't know abt the 2016 - 2018 era tho.
2009-2012 jury and televotes and combined together to get a single result for a country 2013-2015 jury and televotes are averaged together to get a single result for a country (I honestly still don’t get it that much)
This is wrong. In 2016-2018 we didn't have the votes of the rest of the world. So, Italy would have 267 instead of 268, France and Ukraine would have the same amount of points 443 instead of 445 and 453, but still the same positions. Greece would have 123 points, Luxembourg 99, Armenia 178, Switzerland 585, Ireland 271, Croatia 539 and Israel 363. All countries would stay in the same positions but with less amount of points.
I do not include the rest of the world and people complain. I include the rest of the world and people complain. Moral of the story: Nothing's ever right for people.
True, there was no Rest of the World vote before 2023. However, if they'd decided to announce the 2024 public vote results from the lowest placed public score to the highest placed public score, they'd have still had the Rest of the World vote this year, so the finalist public vote totals would have been exactly the same as were announced on the night; just a different order.
nah the song was incredibly mid im sorry. nothing bad to say about it but it doesnt stand out in any way. the only reason the public vote was so high is because of the completely insane marketing campaign it had, including but not limited to nyc billboards and embassies calling up their citizens to vote, as well as it being promoted as an epic way to own the libs among the general public
The song is literally the most boring shit for 2 minutes and at the last minute Eden tries to catch our attention by showing off her voice... ofc she's got a good voice but if the song is bad then I'm sorry but u can't expect anything better. Glad the juries didn't just see the voice quality and rated the actual song. It isn't even bad it's just plain boring
![[Part 1] ทารกน้อยถูกทิ้ง👶 หญิงชราเก็บขวดขายเลี้ยงดูเขาจนโต #โลกการละคร](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nPTDvFCExks/mqdefault.jpg)
One of the few years during which this system would be epic
Why
Because Switzerland only came in 5th place in televote while being 1st in jury's ranking. Then, it would be up to the number of points that the 4 remaining countries get and if one of them eventually take 1st place.
Yeah but if you are good with maths then you can already tell that no country would be able to pass them by the time it’s the last two countries being announced
2018 was pretty epic
This would've been exciting too
How did Greece not get top 7
This system is kind of unfair for the second and third places because they basically never get the opportunity to be at the top and hope for a victory. Last year it was so exciting to see Käärijä getting 376 points and this year as well I was so happy when Baby Lasagna received his points but with these systems we wouldn't have enjoyed these moments at all because the winners would have already been standing at the top with a colossal number of points and we would have been stressed out whether the televote winner could have surpassed that
Interesting. For me this system gives more attention to the top televote acts. Since we know that they were very sucessfull when there are only 10 or 5 countries left. I think for example for Silvester from Lithuania it would have felt more exiting for him to see that he got in top ten of televote instead of just hearing a two digit number while still many countries to come
@@esc_gabThis! With the current system the jury heavy countries get all the spotlight. They get it during the presentation of the juryvotes, and they get it during the presentation of the televotes, while the countries with low jury scores but high televotes don‘t get the spotlight they deserve. Best moments with the old system included Poland 2016 and Denmark 2018, when they got low jury points but then had that huge FU-moment towards the juries as they got their televotes
Thanks you jurys again.....
yeah, jury >> tele
Yep, thanks jury! Switzerland was the best and luckily the juries knew it was and made it win!!❤️🇨🇭
@@radeq1710 so you'd rather have Israel 2nd place? Interesting.
@@beniesc1504 what you mean? israel was 2nd in tele
@@radeq1710 Yes exactly. You said tele is better than the jury, but the televote had Israel 2nd, and thanks to the jury they did not win, because they ranked them 12th
Looking back, I think the new system, announcing the score according the final of Jury vote, make it a bit more tense' so I am good with the current system. Mind you, you calculate at every point how many points are "left" because the total points, according the current system from the televote are : (number of participate countries+1)*58. Where 58 is the sum of all number between 1 to 8 , plus 10 , plus12.
As a swiss i think i would have died with this system 😅
Malin Åkerman: 0 points to the United Kingdom.
4 points to Norway.
5 points to Austria.
11 points to Spain.
12 points to Slovenia.
13 points to Portugal.
18 points to Germany.
19 points to Georgia.
Petra Mede: 20 points to Luxembourg.
28 points to Latvia.
31 points to Finland.
32 points to Serbia.
33 points to Estonia.
44 points to Cyprus.
49 points to Sweden.
Actually according to this system, it's 16 points to Luxembourg, 76 points to Armenia, 82 points to Greece, 103 points to Italy, 129 points to Ireland, 220 points to Switzerland, 225 points to France, 297 points to Ukraine, 311 to Israel and 329 to Croatia.
Overall: Luxembourg 99 points (the same position)
Armenia 177 points (the same position)
Greece 123 points (the same position)
Italy 267 points (the same position)
Ireland 271 points (the same position)
Israel 363 points (the same position)
France 443 points (the same position)
Ukraine 443 points (the same position)/more points from televote then France
Croatia 539 points (the same poistion)
Switzerland 585 points (the same position)
Thank u juries ❤
Well the ending would have been tense but the bottom 10-15 with all these low points would have been a slog to get through wouldn't it?
Do it with older system
ARMENIA and France and Greece 💋🇦🇲♥️😍😍😍😍😍😍😍♥️
👇
I expected Portugal would've received more points from voters
😮i expected that too
With that avarage song, o don't think so
the EBU refusing to upload Iolanda’s final performance until it was already too late because she had Palestinian symbols on her nails was going to do that
Portugal's song was awful
@user-oy9xr5xu6h no, awful songs are Finnish, Slovenian, Spanish, Estonian, and Norwegian songs. Portuguese song was so 👍👍
My winner France ❤
i kind of dont understand how old system was working, does it work that just they read who got the least to most points?
Yea
Просто сначала показывали баллы от 0 до самого большого, а не начиная с последнего места жюри, как это придумали в 2019 году.
It's really not a different system. Very much a pointless video.
@@felixsteinauer They just announce the points differently, it's good for the ones that preferred it like that
@@felixsteinaueryou’re clearly not a Eurovision geek like the rest of us 😂
I imagine there would have been a lot of palpable ohhhhh's in the crowd when Switzerland had their points awarded as "early" as 5th place, like you could be forgiven for assuming they'd be leapfrogged.
Eurovision does not deserve this masterpiece.
babe we don't know what song you're talking about
@@adamatemymuffin9783Slimane's one. The song, the vocals, all was perfect. But this tv show is so corrupted. It's so pathetic tbh.
@@Shinoroit was pretty boring ngl. Vocals aren't everything. I think I have like 10 or more songs from this year in my playlist and France isn't one of them.
@@salle2149 vocals are everything, you guys just want more and more with scene effects, lights,...
It's a song contest. Not a scene show one's.
@@Shinoro YOU just said it. A SONG contest, not a voice contest. I'm not saying the song is bad, neither is the performance as a whole. But it's not worthy of winning.
How did you do it?
With PowerPoint
@@escvalerio Ok thanks
France 🇫🇷
This was way less predictable actually
Wait... so we have:
1956 - 2008 only jury voting;
2009 - 2015 old voting system where juryvote and televote are merged;
2016 - 2018 old/modern voting system where countries who received the least televote would be announced first during televote;
2019 - NOW modern voting system where where countries who received the least juryvote vould be announced first during televote
I didn't know abt the 2016 - 2018 era tho.
2009-2012 jury and televotes and combined together to get a single result for a country
2013-2015 jury and televotes are averaged together to get a single result for a country (I honestly still don’t get it that much)
I believe 1998-2008 was televoting only with a few exceptions
@@sherb217 It was in 2009 that televote and juries had both 50% power each. Before that year juries were more powerful.
@@JoshuaTag en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_at_the_Eurovision_Song_Contest
what is the difference?
They do NOT like Norway
OMG Croatia lost again 😭😭😭😭😭
It was the best song sorry.
what's the purpose of this video? we live in the present, not in the past.
dude it just shows why the new system is way better
This is wrong. In 2016-2018 we didn't have the votes of the rest of the world. So, Italy would have 267 instead of 268, France and Ukraine would have the same amount of points 443 instead of 445 and 453, but still the same positions. Greece would have 123 points, Luxembourg 99, Armenia 178, Switzerland 585, Ireland 271, Croatia 539 and Israel 363. All countries would stay in the same positions but with less amount of points.
I do not include the rest of the world and people complain. I include the rest of the world and people complain.
Moral of the story: Nothing's ever right for people.
True, there was no Rest of the World vote before 2023. However, if they'd decided to announce the 2024 public vote results from the lowest placed public score to the highest placed public score, they'd have still had the Rest of the World vote this year, so the finalist public vote totals would have been exactly the same as were announced on the night; just a different order.
Por contest litlle yo lithle Is dying
Israel should have gone higher than that! The jury should be out of the voting system and we should allow the public to vote only!
womp womp
nah the song was incredibly mid im sorry. nothing bad to say about it but it doesnt stand out in any way. the only reason the public vote was so high is because of the completely insane marketing campaign it had, including but not limited to nyc billboards and embassies calling up their citizens to vote, as well as it being promoted as an epic way to own the libs among the general public
The song is literally the most boring shit for 2 minutes and at the last minute Eden tries to catch our attention by showing off her voice... ofc she's got a good voice but if the song is bad then I'm sorry but u can't expect anything better. Glad the juries didn't just see the voice quality and rated the actual song. It isn't even bad it's just plain boring
no
No.