Josh Pate On College Football's Biggest WHAT-IF's In 2024 - Part 2 (Late Kick Cut)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 มิ.ย. 2024
- College Football teams are in summer workouts with fall camp around the corner and all eyes on the upcoming 2024 season, and on Late Kick Live Ep 525 Josh Pate discussed the biggest what-ifs the sport has to answer this fall. What if the SEC chews itself up? Could Alabama, UGA, Texas, Ole Miss, Tennessee, and others beat up on each other so bad no clear teams emerge? What if we see TWO undefeated G5 teams? What if Michigan gets high-level QB play this season? Let us know what you think in the comments below and be sure to SUBSCRIBE to the channel and CLICK THE BELL for notifications as we bring you multiple live shows per week!
#CollegeFootball #LateKick #JoshPate
SUBSCRIBE to Late Kick Podcast: link.chtbl.com/LateKick
Twitter: / latekickjosh
Instagram: / latekickjosh - กีฬา
Keep the show free - SUBSCRIBE to the channel and LIKE the video! - JP
As a Pac-10 guy who saw the Pac repeatedly cannibalize itself, with its five best teams all going 2-2 against each other many a season, I say... enjoy the chaos if you're the SEC.
that won’t happen. some of the schedules are too easy for that to happen. Pac-12 was its best in its final year and many years have had the top offense in the country out of any conference
Pretty sure the SEC is used to it
Bad comparison: 7th graders vs Varsity team. The PAC12 is/was weak at the line of scrimmage.
@@veryinteresting591so if a bunch of elite varsity teams all play each other then…..
@@veryinteresting591 Utah and Stanford would like a word with you.
Josh you better be at that Texas @ Michigan game, that's definitely gonna be one of the best games all year
Biggest non con for sure😊
Ehhh prob not . If this was past year sure but Michigan will be nowhere close to elite. Texas will win by 10+
THE CAMPBELL CAMELS. I never thought I'd hear Josh mention them on this show.
Michigan is extremely undervalued. This team will look like the 2021 team, mid but functional offense with a game managing average QB1 and the defense will win most if not all their games. They will lose to OSU but beat Texas and Oregon at home. They ain't winning it, but will get into playoffs.
Ohio state fan here. I think texas will be the proving ground early on. But i also see that defense allowing the offense to grow and develop early on
Don't be surprised if and when the Online and QB loses 3 games this year. Then the socalled fans will be making excuses as to why Michigan took a step back. Michigan won't take a step back because they are a development program it takes 3 to 10 plus years there. Just check there history. It took Jim 9 years and the last 3 to win a championship
@@clarencewalder2985as long as Ryan Day is coaching OSU will be soft and lose to Michigan. Mark my words Michigan beats OSU in the shoe and plants the block M on the 50 again.
the deciding factor will be who has the biggest tv audience
As an fsu fan we already learned this last year. Your record doesn’t matter worth a damn it’s all about quality wins and losses. In which we didn’t have enough quality wins so we got left out
If you know how to watch football, you can easily tell the difference between two teams who have 3 losses each. Too many casuals have opinions on this stuff and it creates this crazy casual echo chamber where you get analysis like "Michigan's defense can't get any better after Hutch and Ojabo leave!" And then it does. For 2 years straight. And probably will again for a 3rd straight year.
I say no only because I think McDonald and definitely Minter are both gonna NFL coaches for a long time, not to say I think Wink wasn’t an excellent hire
@@MarkyMark1221wink is overrated and No NFL team wanted him at the time.
They still have the interior D linemen and Will Johnson, Michigan will still be elite defensively
@clarencewalder2985 Wink literally designed the system that Macdonald and Minter were running.
I think people are overlooking Jack Tuttle as QB for Michigan. He's played behind Penix Jr. and McCarthy and is ready to shine in his last year. He didn't play in the Spring Game but I think he'll be the starter. Michigan will be good but if they beat Texas early on... could be great.
Finally somebody said this about michigan. Everyone just assumes they're going to be weak at QB, but what if they're not? There's a reason they didn't even pursue a QB in the portal. Most see it as the only real question mark on what looks like a loaded team otherwise, especially on defense.
With even just solid QB play, there's no reason to think this season won't just be a continuation of what we've been seeing the past few years.
So many rumblings about Michigan's QB situation, but not a peep about the situation in ohio? Every poll has them at least top 3 and their QB options are a transfer that was going to lose the starting job at K state, a true freshman, or a guy that lost the position battle to mccord last year. I'd argue they're in worse shape at the position than michigan
Agreed 👍🏾 💯
Their ceiling is 9-3
Alex is having the same doubts that milroe had last year‼️and imo he will show the country that he’s a great qb just like milroe did
Not a lot of qbs have the skill sets of a milroe or an orji so be glad he’s michigan starting qb he’s going to give defenses hell in the big 10💯🤝‼️
lol
if michigan gets good qb play i think this team may even be better than the natty team IMO considering the fact that the defense has 4 potential 1st rounders 2 of which being projected top 5 and the offense having a top 5 RB in the country and the best TE
lol
Please talk about the U20 team vs Japan absolutely embarrassing. Japan blew team USA out and I’m pretty sure we had zero 3 stars in that game where did they recruit this staff and players please Josh make a video on this
You could narrow it down by who plays Vanderbilt. That's a start.
IF the SEC's best teams were 10-2, and other conferences had 12-0 or 11-1, the committee would look at who beat their November cupcake by the most points and put them in the final 12.
I can tell you no more than one person in each conference is going to go 12-0 and maybe one other going 11-1 so that still leaves up other spots for other teams. I’m tired of seeing people say “SEC bias” even though we have the best team in the country Georgia and now 4 top ten teams
Long live the camels. God tier hats!🐫
Why would the committee put 2 undefeated g5 teams in? They have already made it clear going undefeated in the power 5 doesn't matter. So they are not gonna waste their time
Take it back to a point based algorithm like the bcs, but with 12 teams. Takes the subjective out of it. Keep conference champ bids, 1 G5 autobid, then at large based on the numbers.
Lowkey a good idea
It’s subjective because who decides the algorithm
@@jdtheguitartist you use well defined data points. I’m sure there’s a way to make it as objective as possible.
This is just historic mis-remembering... the BCS was NEVER just point based algorithims........ Thats not how the rankings were calculated. From 1998-2001 it was 50% computers and 50% human polls, from 2002-2013 it was 33% computers and 67% human polls. FYI theres a reason why this was changed in 2001 (cuz Nebraska got ANNHILIATED by #4 CU in the B12 title by 38 and yet still made the championship over them and a PAC Champ #2 Oregon) - also this historical fact completely destroys the narrative that the CFP was created because the 2011 selection.
What human and computer polls were used also changed 6 times during the lifetime of this system. Which is also why its incredibly sus that media talks about how legitimate the CFP was in reference to BCS composite rankings of the last decade - The BCS formula changed so much, so what "BCS rankings" were actually used to legitimize the CFP?
Somehow all of yall forgot that the BCS had insane levels of controversy leading to major polls like the AP refusing to be associated with them, and other sponsors literally getting convicted by the FBI for corruption. Like jesus christ talk about some revisionist history acting like this never happened.....
@@Gillespie28 “well defined” care to give an example?
What if georgia loses to both clemson and georgia tech and then loses the sec championship game. Now theirs 1 spot left for grabs and it's between them and a 2 loss acc team. Should uga get the nod?
You need to give more context in 21 or this year?
They make more money so yes.
LMAO! UGA is not losing to Georgia Tech!
Michigan had a super experienced team last year. Defensively the could do whatever they wanted. Expect a fall back.
Thank you!!! The expanded playoff was a pure money play and had absolutely nothing to do with football
Has to do with more teams playing for a Natty it’s common sense lol
Texas vs Georgia rematch In the sec championship, Tennessee and ole miss are the other two sec teams both with two losses
Should have used the BCS system with a 4 team playoff. 12 is overboard
How about f*ck no.... The BCS was total garbage.... theres a reason that institution got sued by the federal government twice for corruption.....
I like SIX. given the elite SEC BIG - almost needs SEC/B1G champs get byes and SEC/B1G2 get home v next best two. Who really thinks ACC/XII champ would be favored over B/S #2? BTB OSU/MI if both 11-0 pointless. That game BTB - then an immediate playoff game for loser - really rough. They’ll move OSU MI - in a few years. Catching either team after BTB games in successive weeks a big edge for any playoff team - particularly one that didn’t play in a championship game like ND or SEC/B1G3.
@@markmajkowski9545 6 would at least be reasonable. Anymore than that is pointless.
I’m rooting for Oregon St or Wash St going undefeated
We already know who they favor when it comes to a SEC team vs an undefeated one🤦🏼♂️
They found a reason to remove Florida State. For any group of 5 team to get in things have to go perfect, good schedule, and stay healthy. i can't see multiple teams pulling that off.
I think, to borrow a phrase from RGIII, that we'll see an Orji in the end zone a lot of times this year.
I'll also add that if Orji is a strength for the team, and Michigan runs the table in the B1G again, beating TTDS again en route, maybe more than once if they meet in the conf. title game and/or the playoff, and wins another national title, TTDS will say goodnight to Ryan Day.
If that happens and if the Buckeyes lose they could certainly decide to fire Coach Day. Personally I’d call it a mistake to fire someone who is delivering what he’s delivered to the program, but it could happen. Rivalries as we know can carry an inordinate amount of weight and pressure.
RTR
@skipgumphrey9579 there's no way Day survives if they drop a 4th straight. Especially since expectations in Columbus are skyhigh (more so than usual), and they believe all kinds of nonsense about michigan only winning because of signs and they're going to take a huge step back this year.
I think Ryan Day is gone if OSU loses to Michigan for the 4th straight time. I would be laughing at that, but I think the OSU fanbase needs to feel safe as a "big dog" with Oregon, Washington and USC coming into the conference. If they lose to Michigan a 4th straight time, their confidence and morale will be shattered. And I will laugh. (Note: TCU fan.)
@@scottd1903if Jim can survive Michigan and be 0 and 5 against Ohio/urban Myer and not get fired but then rebound and finish with 3 straight wins plus a Natty then Day won't get fired either he only 1 and 3. Losing 3 straight but Jim lose ,5 straight and plus postpone one year. Yes Ohio State standards of winning are higher than Michigan
@@clarencewalder2985 harbaugh inherited a 5 win (and 7 the year before that) team that had only beat ohio once in over a decade. Day inherited a 13 win team that had been a top 3 program for the better part of a decade. I think it's safe to assume harbaugh had a bit more leeway than Day has. Most ohio fans think this season will be a disappointment if they don't win thr NC let alone the B10. I just don't see how he survives if Michigan wins again, unless they meet in the playoffs of B10 title game and ohio beats them there.
G5 schools need to have a minimum of 2 P4 teams on their schedule.
Might as well let the G5 have their own playoffs
Josh makes a great point that i've been making... the more you expand it, the more people will bitch about being the first or second team out even if it's a 96 team playoff. it's stupid
More teams getting a shot at competing for a Natty is the point. Not teams complaining about not getting in. Who cares
Why Tulsa getting hate 😂
The SEC has no room to complain if an undefeated G5 gets in over a 3 loss SEC team when they play FCS teams in November. If we're not supposed to count G5 wins, they certainly can't count fcs wins, especially when every other conference is playing the toughest part of their schedule at the end of the season.
Amen... and hardly ever play true non conference road games
Its not even about that....... Do you have any idea the amount of G5 teams that have been insanely shafted over the last 5 decades in favor of lower ranked P5 teams.
2011 - 3 G5 teams ranked in the Top 14 in the nation - ZERO G5 teams made BCS bowls, which by the bylaws of the selection process should have been impossible. The Orange bowl that season featured #16 Clemson vs #23 West Virginia......
1998 #7 Tulane went undefeated and didnt even make a major bowl.
2008 - the only undefeated teams in the league were in the G5 and both had Top 10 wins. ZERO G5 teams made a title. 3 G5 teams ranked in the top 10, yet only 1 made a major bowl.
1971-1974 Toledo holds the 3rd longest win streak of all time - 3 seasons undefeated - they made ZERO bowl games despite being ranked in the Top 15 by AP every season and being a FBS Division 1 team.
The P5 has at least 30 YEARS of recompense to make up for before we even entertain the idea that the G5 somehow owes the P5 for something.....
Michigan is such a sleeper, I cannot remember the last time the previous champ was written off so easily.
Not a sleeper but it won't surprise many if they make playoffs or miss out on it. A new coaching staff,new QB new online wr a RB that hit or miss. Not enough depth AND most Michigan fans think they reload but they rebuild and develop and it takes up to ,3 to 10 years to complete with other elite teams. And that was with a great Michigan coach Jim who had a losing record against other elite teams
If Michigan gets solid QB play they will make the playoffs and be the team nobody wants to see in their path because to beat them you will have to win a rock fight from start to finish that could wear down any team who beats them heading into the next round.
When we got the BCS we got 1 vs 2 Then it started with the cries that 3 or 4 is just as good. Then came the 4 team playoff then it started again with 5 or 6 should have got in. Now with the 12 team playoff number 12 will be left out and the cries will start again this season. Some will cry no matter what is done.
I dont think you ever watched the BCS, cuz if you did youd know that the take was never 3 or 4 is just as good. Bruh there were multiple seasons of 5+ UNDEFEATED TEAMS in the BCS..... There are teams in the BCS era that received multiple #1 polls that didnt even rank in the Top 6 by BCS rankings.
An 8 team playoff was submitted in the middle of the BCS; 5 YEARS before the CFP even existed!
You dont know wtf youre talking about....
@@MattBuild4 lol
@@charlesmims5863 Contending teams in the BCS era:
1998 - Tennesse, FSU, Arizona, Ohio State, Wisconsin, Tulane
1999 - FSU, Virginia Tech, Marshall
2000 - Oklahoma, FSU, Miami, Washington
2001 -Miamia, Nebraska, Colorado, Oregon
2002 - Ohio State, Miami
2003 - LSU, Oklahoma, USC, Michigan, Miami Ohio
2004 - USC, Oklahoma, Auburn, Utah, Boise State, Louisville
2005 - USC, Texas
2006 - Florida, Ohio State, Boise State, Michigan, Louisville
2007 - LSU, Ohio State, USC, Georgia, West Virginia, Kansas, Oklahoma
2008 - Florida, Oklahoma, Utah, Boise State, USC, Oregon, Texas, Penn State
2009 - Alabama, Texas, TCU, Boise State, Cincinatti
2010 - Auburn, Oregon, TCU
2011 - LSU, Alabama, Oklahoma State, Stanford, Boise State
2012 - Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oregon
2013 - FSU, Auburn, Michigan State
Go ahead and give an at large to Notre Dame every year so that’s one less group of 5 every year.
Go Blue! 〽️🏆
G5 team - needs 3 P4 wins - to even qualify - and ONE needs a 10 FPI. Walkover game for the 5 seed. Needs to be a Play In v #12
Oh thats funny, are you gonna pay the G5 back for how many times GARBAGE P5 teams magically took their spots from major bowls? Its not even close.... Your debt is about 40 YEARS LONG AT THIS POINT.....
Oh your upset a G5 team may be underranked vs #12? DO YOU NOT REMEBER WHAT HAPPEND IN 2010 and 2011?
Boise State ranked #6 in the country, with a 12-1 record, and 4 Top 25 wins including over the ACC Champion in OOC. They ranked #2 in offense, #2 in defense and #1 in MOV. Insane god tier stats - 48ppg, 11papg, nearly 40 point margin of victory per game!. This team DIDNT EVEN MAKE A FREAKING BOWL GAME... Do you know who did? 8-5 UNRANKED P5 Champion Uconn.
BSU beat top 20 teams by DOUBLE what Uconn scored on average per game! 5 LOWER ranked P5 teams made a major bowl over BSU.
And it wasnt the only time. In 2011 - THE SAME BS HAPPENED. BSU went #6, TCU went #12, UH went #14 - all winning 12+ games. That year the Orange bowl was #16 Clemson vs #23 WV. The G5 didnt even get a single team in major bowls somehow......
YALL OWE THE G5 SO GOD DAM MUCH before you even consider making this bs argument.....
@@MattBuild4 Every playoff team beat 3 P5’s and one rated 10 FPI. Playing G5 teams doesn’t really wear down teams either. G5 FRESH against beat up P5 team - possible. Ranking bias RIFE with overestimating fewest losses-P5-too. No one watches G5-and to qualify for the Natty - you have to play a Natty norm. ACC BXII have been exceedingly weak. Six teams PLENTY. Boise COULD play 3 P4 teams - Liberty too- and doesn’t. Heck they should all be on the Road-what GREAT G5 team - Playoff ready - can’t beat 3 even middling P5 teams - on the Road. G5 gets a playoff Walkover if goes to highest ranked - who plays NO P4 teams. AFRAID? Play THREE during the season - not some bowl game after P4 team plays 9 P4 physical games - and G4 - ZERO.
@@markmajkowski9545 I mean Boise literally plays Oregon, Oregon State, Washington State, Georgia Southern and Porttand State in OOC this year.
Would you they play vandy, Arkansas and Florida?
Id think their current schedule is tougher than that.
@@markmajkowski9545 "Play THREE during the season - not some bowl game after P4 team plays 9 P4 physical games - and G4 - ZERO."
I mean this is not an argument to use against Boise State, because they historically routinely get screwed in bowl selection and thus dont play P5 teams in bowls. However they consistently schedule P5 team in OOC.
Last 10 years they have played;:
- at Michigan State
- vs Washington
- at Ole Miss
- at Colorado
- vs Washington
- at Virginia
- vs Washington State
- at UCLA
- at Washington State
- vs Virginia
- at Oklahoma State
- at FSU
- at BYU
- at UCF
- vs Oklahoma State
- at Oregon State
- at Washington
- vs UCF
These are all OOC games notice how 12 of the 18 are on the road.
This year they play Oregon, Oregon State, and Washington State.
Next year they play Washington State and ND both on the road.
The year after that they play Oregon, Cincinnati and Michigan State.
You really chose the wrong team in your argument. BSU is the only program that dgaf and will schedule anyone anytime anywhere. They have 20 years of evidence doing this.
@@MattBuild4We don’t agree. Plainly. But good chance 12 is G5 top team and plays 5 - also good chance that 5 is the “better” B1G/SEC #2 team as seems ACC/XII getting byes. That should give some indicator of G4 “deservingness”. Feels like Liberty v OR - type of repeat - but we shall see. I’d guess #5 by 13-21 Vegas odds. Decision made. Frankly 5/6 seeds IF BIG/SEC runners up very bad draws. The BBall “play ins” were DESIGNED so low seeds get at least a shot. Decision already made. I still say G5 should have a play in. BIG/SEC 2’s likely better than ACC/XII Champ. And SIX teams plenty. Frankly, BIG/SEC teams might PREFER to tie for 2nd lose tiebreak. Rest than play the top team in SEC/BIG and get a home game as a 7/8 seed which will be less wear and tear than the Conf Championship maybe lose then still be 7/8 seed. That extra game just extra punishment and tougher to win that and then 3 playoffs than winning 4 playoff games.
Everybody knows ESPN/Fox will dictate playoff teams based on ratings not records. Remember FSU 13-0 Conference champions
Eh that really doesn’t make sense
1. Fox doesn’t have the rights to the CFP
2. FSU is still under the ESPN banner
The reality is the committee has no logic and consistently when comes to choosing teams one year it’s the most deserving teams the next year it’s the best teams. Me personally I like that it’s going to 12 teams with auto bids other than that it should just be like the BCS top 2
does the best g5 team have to be the 12 seed? What if there is a g5 team that is in the top 10 before the playoff seeding is announced?
Not technically, but they likely will be even if they are ranked higher by AP.
3:50 it’s more likely they feels cheated by a g5 team ranked 17th getting in over a 11 or 12 ranked sec team
you saw Liberty go 12-0 with 3 spots next to dead last in SOS and then get spanked by 10-2 Oregon. if the team ain’t from the AAC or MW, don’t even bother adding them to the equation.
this is also why they need to break off the P5 immediately
You dont want to play this game....... Do you have any idea the amount of G5 teams that outranked P5 teams during the BCS yet got shafted out of major bowls?
And its not even close...... 2010 #7 Boise State missed a BCS bowl despite outranking 5 P5 teams that made it over them, including teams THEY LITERALLY BEAT THAT SEASON..... They put an UNRANKED P5 champion in over that team in 2010. Thats 1 team in 1 season - this BS happened to that 1 program 5 FREAKING TIMES!
@@GoatedAtNFS "this is also why they need to break off the P5 immediately"
Ok go ahead...... but just so you know doing this means you will get absolutely throated by the G5 in federal anti-trust lawsuits. And you better believe they got some serious receipts for the last 80 years.....
The MWC literally submitted an 8 team playoff back in 2009... YALL CHOOSE to not support this because you wanted to maintain a monopoly on BCS bowls - this eventually led to a $2.7 BILLION federal case against the league.
There is no contractual evidence that P5 vs G5 actually exists, its the very reason the CFP had to specify "so called P5" when talking about FSU's claims - because this terminology literally doesnt exist on paper. So in the eyes of a court youd be cutting 80 teams based on feelings - good luck with that.
Josh… did you see Liberty’s bowl game? I don’t care if they’re 25-0. They’ll get slaughtered by any Power 4 team.
Anyone who thought this wasn't about money are just not bright. I've got some real estate for them in Pyongyang. With that in mind, the committee will lean heavily towards getting in as many SEC and B10 teams as possible.
What if So Carolina wins 9 games ?
its not subconscious p4 teams are better then g5 which is why their different things. So if utsa beats Texas and goes undefeated then they should get the spot no question. If utsa and boise somehow both win then the one who ends up with the better win gets in the playoff
If both go undefeated then they both make it, otherwise youd have teams make the playoffs who literally lost to these teams...... That s very clearly a problem.
You're thinking too much! Liberty, Memphis, maybe Tulane could make the playoffs
Talk about a missed opportunity for an on the nose college mascot, Campbell Tomato Cans instead of being the Camels. I suppose that would be detrimental to their branding 😁😁
WHAT IF 12-1 MI loses to 12-1 OSU in B1G and 12-1 TX wins SEC 12-1 GA beats 12-1 ACC Champ 12-1 Clemson will Head to Head MI >TX and GA over CL get them a higher seed?
The committee will take the teams that travel
10-12 wins gets you in easily. 9wins you’ll need help
What if Kentucky wins the sec championship
What if OSU loses again to Michigan. Does Ryan Day flee the state or the whole country? Questions to be answered.
He will be gone
Well if Jim can survive and 0 and 5 start and Michigan fans loving him no matter what then Day probably will survive 1 and 4 start even though Ohio State value winning more than Michigan
"What If" the NCAA vacates Michigan's Natty?
The real G5 question is 13-0 Liberty vs 11-2 Boise State losses to Oregon and OSU
Thats easy - Liberty. They go undefeated they make it its that simple. Based on history BSU could go undefeated and beat their opponent by 100 a game and they wont make it (the fact that they have more undefeated seasons than major bowl appearances illustrates this point extremely well).
Boise is really hype because they have a bunch of unknowns and historically this is the exact same way 2008 started, which coincidentally is also the last time they played Oregon in Autzen and slaughtered a Top 10 Oregon. But, its a huge and ridiculous ask for this team to replicate that roster - they literally had 14 future NFL draft picks and a Top 10 All time college QB. I dont see it.
Imo its more than likely Liberty or texas State who makes it on an undefeated season or a one loss Memphis. The MWC will cannibalize itself. there will be some upsets but expect similar outcomes for record of last season as the MWC OOC is yoked af again this season - the projected top 4 teams in the MWC play Michigan, Oregon, Utah and Texas all on the road.
@@MattBuild4 It will be really interesting to see how the committee handles G5 teams. I really hope a 13-0 Liberty team doesn’t get slaughtered in the CFP when a 1-2 loss Boise or Memphis etc could put up a better fight
@@scottyclayton2501 I dont like that though... If you go undefeated you deserve to make it. Its that simple. I think there can be arguments for an additional G5 team - like if Boise beats Oregon, but loses to like Washington State or something but goes 12-1. Liberty should still make it, but realistically if Oregon isnt overrated, the G5 team would literally have beaten a playoff team, so thats where we can run into controversy.
This could also happen for Memphis, Frenso State, App State or UTSA.
Plus dont dog a team for their first major bowl appearance ever. They didnt have the talent or schemes to win, but its also a learning experience. 2024 shouldnt define that university.
@@MattBuild4Their just has to be some regulation for scheduling you can’t schedule UMass 13 times and expect a playoff bid over elite 1-2 loss teams. Every team should play pretty even schedules so then you truly are what your record says. It sucks to leave out undefeated teams because the players don’t pick the schedule but if Liberty had a low tier Big Ten team like Indiana I would be a lot more gracious towards them but since they joined CUSA they have either had trouble making good schedules or just don’t try, either way I don’t blame them because it worked last year
@@MattBuild4 Also Liberty’s bad schedule (literally ranked dead last by ESPN) only got them to number 23 which happened to be the highest when 2 loss Tulane got up to 16 so maybe their is no reason for me to worry because 23 happened to be the highest G5 in 2023
they must cheat or they will take their ball and go home. and this is still good for the sport?
CAN a G5 team beat a top 10 team in the country? YES.... Will it happen very often? NO.
Please Josh, you and uncle lou..the kiss of death if you pick michigan to start winning 😅
Yea let’s put undefeated G5 teams in the Big 10 and SEC how many wins do they have? This is a joke it’s a free ride to the playoffs because they play nobody? They shouldn’t even be able to go to the playoffs
If I recall the last time a undefeated G5 team played a B10 champion it wasn't the G5 team who lost....... B10? More like little b!tch since 2010......
And for the SEC - the University of Tulane has more SEC Conference titles than 50% of the teams that exist in that conference, which really makes you wonder how tf the bottom half of that conference gets treated like gods for doing jack sh!t nothing for 120 years........
Quality loss is loser talk