i mean...i feel it's gonna be the same as fallout 76 in a sense...it starts off being trash and all that at launch, but with enough time and with "DLC" expansion updates being rolled out, it'll become...decent enough...i mean, it won't be a masterpiece, but it'll at least be decent enough to play while only losing a fraction of your sanity and dignity compared to during launch.
This is not a bad idea at all as I am involved in a project that does actually this from the first day . Players ideas are directly implemented into the game system , yet it's nothing like refactoring and fixing-bugs when the game is already made - this is totally opposite approach and also players act like testers not like the creators.
I recently went back to GTA, and the only problem with it for me is the controls. Obvi it came out 3 generations ago. If it had a more modern feel to the controls, I would continue playing it because everything else is great on it. They've definitely made enough money on the online portion of that game to update the controls if they aren't gonna release gta 6
The most hilarious thing about this whole debacle is the fact that they touted this incredible open world that was more advanced than any other open world in gaming and 8 months later we're watching them moving in baby steps towards the standard reached by GTA III 23 years ago.
I love how the Lighting and shadows load depending on the camera and can't even keep up. Like, they can't do the thing Carmack and Silverman figured out in the 90's.
@@dracoflame3921 the multiplayer comes at 2023 at the earliest, and id assume it would be balanced differently so they're just nerfing stuff cause they wanted to
Dang, they should have just called it: Cyberpunk 2077: Early Access. People might have been more forgiving about the bugs. To me it feels like a AAA Early Access title.
That's exactly what I was thinking. For Christ's sake fallout 76 has less bugs than this game and they both came out with the same amount of broken and are similar ages. To me it just seems like the devs still weren't ready to make a game as big as this, they either needed more experienced people or just more people in general.
I tried to argue with people that were rushed by corporate and impatient people. Their argument for being whiny about it was that they kept pushing back the date.
When this game was released, People talks trash to me for saying I was going to wait to buy it. Said I’d get it for maybe $20 less a year after release. I got it for $10 at Best Buy this week.
@@CheesyCharlie I applaud you sir, I bought it end of July on steam and where I live it was like $6 or something, nada. And I actually really enjoyed the story, the music. Sure it has it's problems, but I'd have been happy paying $15 or so for it in its current state.
It's crazy that this game has been out for this long, and they're still adding things like "cars will go around you". Rock Star are probably pissing themselves laughing.
Rockstar already create this type of games from 90ish maybe.. until now, so they had many experience and time spends on this genre, in other hand cd first time jump into this kind of games, witcher not count, because it's different era
Tbh that was half the reason it kept me playing, I treated the game as basically a “how cool can I make clearing out this area look” simulator, and the parkour/jump aspect was a big part of that.
This game is shaping up to be a good game, eventually. Sadly it seems like that won't be until around when the game was suppose to be released - two years. Truly a triple A early access.
I'm still sad there's no factions part of this game. Like, sure there's the gangs but for the most part...You're on your own. You can't join and work up through Arasaka, or Millitech, or even MaxTac. I feel like that could have been super cool options for the ending, if you have the loyalty of, say, MaxTac and you'd be able to genuinely seige Arasaka Tower with their support. Fallout New Vegas style support from factions would add a really interesting twist to this game, so I'm sad it's not part of it.
I remember when they made it seem like you would be able to join a gang and your experience in the world would totally change based on it. They really gaped everyone and put it in dry.
@@lance1506 Mercenary role and a faction role can exist in the same game lol. Like, V basically joins the Aldecaldos if you help Panam. They just didnt make it explicit or give any faction benefits. So, its likely that they just didnt have the time to flesh out the faction/gang system.
They also said that wearing different types of clothing would influence your street rep and get different reactions from people/gangs depending on where you were in the city and what clothes you had on. Now all clothes are the same (just an armour value) and you just try to find something half decent looking with 3/4 mod slots.
I really hope that this ends up like another No Man's Sky situation, where it started out horrible but later on would become essentially what they promised if not better in some ways than what they promised. Considering the fact that CD Projekt Red actually apologized, and the new DLC, I have hope that will be the case and they can rebuild their reputation.
@@randomloverofcheese I have to disagree with you there. The side missions are pretty solid and though the gameplay is definitely not the best(excluding bugs), it’s not absolutely horrendous. I personally don’t like many leveling mechanics in games but that’s more so personal opinion and pet peeve. At least it’s not like fallout 76 where they didn’t even include the most basic human NPC’s, and don’t have nearly as many bugs as 76 despite the memes (feel like the only reason 76 got a pass on some things is because of Bethesda’s reputation of bugs and “it’s a feature not a bug” meme). So it’s not THAT bad, and can definitely be reworked so long as the CD Projekt Red team actually works on the game and put devotion into it. Even if it takes years like No Man’s Sky did, it’s definitely doable, especially when compared to the number of people Hello Games has to CD Project Red.
Semi apologized. In their apologies they still showed signs of deflecting and negating. At time of release they officially said that "the finished game[at that point] was still better than anything shown previously in promo trailers." paraphrasing here from memory.
@@Thefootqueen Fallout 76 basically is No Man's Sky as well at this point. Bethesda really improved the game, the dialogue trees are arguably better than Fallout 4
@@Humanaut. 1) Fair but they didn’t have to apologize at all, and frankly it is better than nothing. I’d rather have a half-baked apology than nothing at all. If it was any other company we would receive no apology. 2) Saying something is finished when it isn’t is honestly just business. Scummy business yeah but you can’t go out and say “oh no, it’s a buggy mess.” Especially when other companies you are working with and the platforms you work on are expecting it to be completed. Plus they didn’t have many options as it was, especially with the massive hype train and how angry people were getting because they kept delaying the game. Doesn’t excuse it at all just saying not many other options, the most they could do was attempt to lower people’s expectations, problem is price tags set expectations.
@@austindailey29 I think they are capable, speaking as a dev myself, it really comes down to how the project is managed. My guess is the project managers wanted to get this out the door without proper testing(unit tests, integration tests, functional tests and acceptance testing). Without feedback from testing teams, the devs wouldn’t be be keen to things like map zoom changes for user convenience. At this point the public is pretty much the test team.
@@RalfBelmont I'm not saying they are competent or incompetent. From my point of view as a software developer, a lot of factors like management, funding and deadlines come into play. I could for example want to put in a really great feature into a project, however all that needs to be approved by project managers and needs to be funded. Else I'd just be doing it on my own time not getting paid for the work. We basically focus on the main features first then have minor re-adjustments later. Things like game breaking bugs could even be swept under the rug because it just "works" most of the time, and therefore a project manager could just say "it's good enough we should just push for our release deadline." I also don't want to rag on managers that much, there's a good number that are great at it. But I'm willing to bet this game was poorly managed.
Imagine some rando who’s completely ignorant to the complexities of game development/debugging dismissing your hundreds of hours of work. I feel more sympathy for them then some douchebag complaining about their third world game problem.
just like in skyrim and fallout 4 when you have cloaking armor, the npc's are like "where did they go?" while looking you straight in the eye. weirdly oblivion got this right, if you have enchanted armor that cloaks you, the npc's run around confused not aware of where you are. there should be a global flag set to tell the AI to ignore the player, and disable head tracking whenever your invisible, they would probably have to set this for every type of npc in the game, so idk maybe they just haven't gotten around to it since they had dozens of other things to fix?
@@ContentPlugs If you’re invisible, then light does pass through you. That’s how it works. You can only see things because of light, and if you see through something it’s because the light doesn’t scatter towards your eyes. If you have a shadow… then the light hitting you bounces off of you… which means you are visible. Why would the light all around you pass through you, except for the light above you from the sun? No light rays should bounce off of you, so you should not have a shadow. It’s like shining a flashlight on glass… why would you see a shadow on the other side of the light pases through it.
@@stuckylar I worded it weird but it defends on how the invisibility would work. I.e camouflage or whatever the case may be. Assuming it’s cyberpunk the light would reflect off some kind of material
I get the impression Cyberpunk really saved allot of gamers from a wave of post-covid buggy games. The massive number of games that seem to have been delayed shows that it has at least taught developers an important lesson that last minute patching only goes so far.
@@johanndaart7326 They made those money only thanks to Witcher 3. That was foundation for the whole Cyberpunk hype. Their next game will not sell so many copies before launch. That's sure.
@@johanndaart7326 Yes and no. Getting pulled from the playstation store HURT CDPR and upset their investors in a big way. Remember that investors and big companies don't focus on initial box sales anymore. They want infinitely recurrent revenue so even if CP2077 sold a lot of units initially they missed out on planned revenue for later in the year. Other companies don't want to make that mistake. Now I think the gameplan is to overhype and overpromise, but not so much that the stock price goes down on release.
Having the minimap rendering connected to the actual geometry rendered on-screen is the most glaring indicator of how jank their implementation is. I mean, FFS, we had games with functional minimaps 30 cocking years ago. I myself implemented a labyrinth-like game with a minimap on my 2nd year in college, after 8-10 OpenGL lectures.
rendered to actual geometry only really makes sense for procedurally generated games. they should just remake the entire minimap in .vector /illustrator than just update the position over the vector depending on the players x,z position. would take them less than a week id reckon,you could probably do it in a day of 2-3
@@sginrummy88 Once you've got a level designed, you can just run a virtual camera over it from above. That's a basic full world map, then you just sync the minimap position to the player position. Skim the camera through at any "level" and repeat. To get the stylized map they've got here, either manual tracing over the top of that full world image (it doesn't take as long as you think) or you can use laplace algorithms to detect edges. The reason realtime geometry is used here, is that the minimap will never need to be updated again; anything new added will be automatically added. It seems like the developers have always struggled with numbers/skillsets of their developers, so it is more of an efficiency choice rather than any technical reason.
@@sginrummy88 You could do this by making multiple image slices vertically of the map, and based on your z change what shows on minimap. There are a lot of simple ways to work around the issue.
@@TheIndieGamesNL I dont understand why they cant do that? it seems so fucking obvious. I know nothing about coding or game development but surely the map is just an image that tracks where you are? not an actual representation of the ingame world?
There is only one thing I really wanna see changed and that's max ammo. I hate not having enough ammo to just run around and shoot. If I can hold over 6k cans of fucking soda I can hold over 6k rounds of assault rifle ammo.
as someone who has been in real life battle and run out of ammo I fully agree with you :) never too much ammo!!! and on top of that we are talking rounds like you point out and a soda can is heavier than most bullets.
@Archer Cillian yeah, there was a few times I looked at my ammo and realized that the risk vs reward wasnt worth it. I been working on a gunslinger build that makes me dangerous with almost every weapon. With that when im in a fight and run out of ammo, I can use the enemies with no issues and still dishing out alot of damage
@Archer Cillian "not just rely on one gun" You like that, good. I hate it. When I find a gun I like I want to use only that gun. It should be an option, with a perk or something. As a developer you shouldn't stifle players freedom!
@@Kazeromaru you are eithere invisible or not invisible. You could be different grades of cloaked, but he said you will become completely cloaked and invisible. Mostly in videogames if you are supposed to be invisible, they make an outline of some sort to help the player see which weapons or items they are currently using. If the player in this clip is just as "invisible" as it is portrayed, the AI is obviously even worse, as they dont care to do anything with the floating plasma person in front of them.
@@Kazeromaru you don't shimmer when you go invisible. Light doesn't bounce off of you, but just ignores you and goes through you (you become air). By shimmer, if you meant the hologram kind of hands and gun that you saw in the FPV, that's just for the player's reference, the in game world doesn't see it.
You were talking about how a bunch of bugs had been fixed while on screen the most interesting shadow mishap was happening. It's mesmerizing. Great recap though! Thanks for explaining all the changes.
That’s a tall order. Hello Games was a new IP coming from a studio that flooded during NMS development that stuck with their game to become one of the more beloved IPs out there. CDPR has the opposite problem. They’re riding off the massive success of the Witcher series and W3 in particular. Time is moving past this game and I’m sure one of these years they will reach that final stage but we will have all moved on by then. Could this be the downfall of CDPR perhaps?
The problem is that its not multiplayer. It was advertised as one of the biggest if not the biggest single player story driven rpg game ever made and once that first impression hit everyone, it was over.
@@Sailor1010 It feels to me like there is STILL a ton of work to do to get anywhere near a completed product. I honestly don't think I have ever seen a game with so many weird bugs and so much cut content. And now it has a bunch of new bugs and some of the original ones back. Honestly I either think they will move on and try and PR their way out of this, or they will bankrupt themselves trying to redeem CP2077.
A rushed game is never good. A delayed game is eventually good. They dropped the ball so hard there is no amount of updates that is going to fix this game. It’s bad at the core.
I mean, at this rate it’ll only be good in 2077 comparatively because the earth will probably be a heat blasted ruin with scattered pockets of ppl huddled around surviving tech playing whatever’s left to escape reality.
>Free DLC is basically 3 cosmetic items and an NPC skin >New car is fucking terrible and easily outclassed by most others around the same pricetag >Neither Jacket looks as good as some of the Unique legendaries or Iconics already in-game and obscures shirt underneath >New Johnny skin is fucking awful >Driving still sucks and anything even remotely fast skids all over the place for zero reason >F key is still hardbound to select and interact for some functions and requires manually editing the config file to properly rebind for left-handed people >Crash revolver still stuck in my inventory and flagged as a quest item despite finishing the questline, recieving all texts and finishing the interactions >My Archangel revolver lost ~500 DPS going from 1200 to 700 >Lack of optimization means the game still chugs like an alcoholic locomotive on anything but top-of-the-line hardware >Beat on the Brat quests still absolute garbage with teleporting enemies and broken hitboxes for no reward >Still no in-game customization for cars, clothes, or players >My faster reload perks now only work around 50% of the time making rifle reloads godawful >Switching weapons still takes an eternity and sometimes switches to the wrong weapon slot >Weapon wheel is finicky and hard to use for MnK players Don't buy this game. End of story. There's too much wrong to fix and making DLC will cost too much to be worth it for the developer. I predict it will be abandoned shortly after the 1 year anniversary and CDPR will quietly move on to a new Witcher-related project to try and make sales on what little goodwill is left over from Witcher 3
Its sad that this game will never be what it was meant to or what was advertised, no matter how much patchs or dlcs, the game at its core its just different from what they said and thats a shame, i expected more from them after TW3
I was expecting a visual downgrade on the Ps4/Xbox along with some bugs and less pedestrians on the streets for performance and stuff but even if they fix those things your initial life path doesn’t really add anything besides dialogue options. factions would have been cool and with the gangs could work great.
@@DOODOOBUTT_ not only that, they promised a huge open world rpg with a lot of choices and the game is more like a linear shooter looter with few choices
This really looks like a good step in the right direction as someone who has played some of the game during launch and taking a break from it hopefully I can return back early next year
I bought the game hoping they would fix it. I played through a couple missions then stopped. As soon as they make the city more lively by adding more npcs walking around or events. I might consider playing more.
I'm just glad CDPR isn't abandoning the game. Albiet i do heavily believe it deserves to be marked as "Early Access" due to how broken the game has been for such a long time. Edit: I wasn't expecting over 180 likes! Thankyou! Also, Cyberpunk isn't a bad game, just a game that deserved to have been delayed by another year or two. Than launch into Early Access if it's still riddled with bugs.
Agreed i am fortunate to have an 3070 the game is enjoyable but it’s still broken!!! Amount bugs I found are insane, wish they had more funding for a 2021 release even 2022.
That’s funny because I want them to just abandon it and work on something else. I think it’s a lost cause haha. But I get your point, I’m just somewhat pessimistic about this whole game after all this time.
@Prince Smith None. I will not buy a game on day 1 again, no matter how high profile the AAA developer is. I have too large a backlog of games as it is anyway.
@Prince Smith Really? You really going to try and place some blame on gamers for the state of the game at release? Nobody told CDPR to announce the release date in the first place. They could have waited until the game was actually ready before announcing a launch date. Shocker that when you announce a launch date, gamers correctly assume that the game will be ready on that day. Most people understand that delays happen, again CDPR provided the dates, not gamers. If they needed a year, they should have said they needed a year, it happens in gaming. Instead, they lied and said they needed just a little more time to "polish" the game. They delayed the game three times, once after they had promised it would be ready. It was at that point that people "were right up their noses bugging them" because something didn't smell right with the multiple delays and people were rightfully worried and suspicious. There is no blame other than we as gamers have to stop giving developers the benefit of doubt and pre-ordering games at all.
Knives that are for throwing deserves its own slot since every time you throw them you need to re-equip another knife in the menu and that kinda messes up the "flow" of the game, you feel me?
I'm in the same boat. really wanna play this game but know its not worth diving in right away. gives me time to get a good graphics card to fully appreciate it
@@Sumea_Saukko true, however the problem isn't as simple as "The game got fixed so everyone is happy!". There are many people who had invested in the development of this game. Since the sales didn't make up, those people are in a loss. Now by the time the game fixes the inflation and Steam sale will not help them get as much money. Secondly the trust issues. Until now CDPR was seen on the same level as Rockstar, which will make flawless masterpieces. Now when the next CDPR game comes (Witcher IV for example) people will not pre-order it the way they did for Cyberpunk. And finally the long term updates. Most games which redeem themselves do it after years of updates. No Man's Sky took 5 years to redeem itself, while Fallout 76 has taken 3 years and still not redeemed itself. Now if there were any plans of a Cyberpunk sequel, they have to go to rest until this game fixes itself. And No Man's Sky and Fallout 76 weren't as hyped as Cyberpunk 2077, so this game will take even longer to redeem itself. It really pains me to say this, but this game will still be considered bad for at least the next three years. Though there's hope, since they have been patching things up real quick. Let's hope it becomes the next No Man's Sky instead of the next Marvel's Avengers.
The "Contrast Shadows" toggle in the graphics menu controls "the darkness" creeping across the screen. Turning it off, go back to game, then turning it back on fixes this bug. But only on a per-life basis, it can come back if you die and respawn.
@@dciking I just turned my DLSS to balanced and that fixed it for me. This game runs so much better with DLSS on. You get way more frames idc what GPU you have. Lol.
It's difficult to understand how they released a game that has spawning/despawning set up the way Cyberpunk does. It's even more difficult to understand how they haven't addressed that already. But, hey! Sometimes you'll find a cat in the shower now so that's super dope.
now so that's super dope. Sometimes you "ll find a cat in the shower haven't addressed that already. But, hey! more diffcult to understand how they set up the way (Cyberpunk does lt's even a game that has spawning / despawning lt's diffcult to understand how they released hink so thnks the of it was ever des cur evair you que that beys thin conters Cyberpunk the to way cunds qwers que you it's in on aszin But.. cours the they ast persin
Imagine this game was third person and seeing your character's best customization stats be a suit top, with jogging pants and a silly helmet for the entire game. Bad enough seeing him on a bike !!!... I swear this game was made by no one who worked on the Witcher 3.
last generation console hardware is a boat anchor for progress, it's holding the development back so much. I wish they just ditched the old gen versions
That wouldn't have changed anything. They prioritized new gen so much, they didn't know their own game was a dumpster fire on the previous gen until they were burning copies.
Only if they're prepared to refund everyone or deal with paying them out more via a class-action lawsuit. Regardless, I bought the game new for my PS4 Slim and had no bugs, which was odd seeing as how I seem to be a rare case. But I also recently bought a "physical" copy for PC so I can ramp up the quality, mod it, etc since it runs the best on that platform.
It’s crazy, when I played the game back in December I had an almost bug and glitch free experience (on PC). Such a great game, I’m so sorry for everyone who really struggled with bugs
@@screenwriter7094 Same for me as well. No serious bugs or glitches at all in 350+ hours of play the first month or so the game was out. Some minor funny stuff that did not hurt anything and then the updates started happening which were focused for consoles and started to hurt PC in the process. Pop-in got worse with almost zero fps increase in performance. Bugs and glitches i never had started to happen cause of patches mainly intended to help consoles.
It’s not a great game. That’s a fact. Bugs aren’t the only issues and if you think that’s the main reason for why people hate it then you’re ignorant or dumb
@@pixelhand9421 You are absolutely right, I have a feeling a lot of people made it their hobby to cry on the internet about the issues of games. I'm sure a lot of them didn't even play the game and just follow the trend of complaining
This game feels like a fever dream, or a tear from another timeline that we weren't meant to see. At this point they could fix the game 100% and I still would feel sick about the tragedy that was Cyberpunks release.
I wonder if they ever expected it to be the full experience this game. The first Watchdogs was a good game but not everything it could've been. They love releasing games that hold back nowadays so the sequel seems better.
I'm still mad too. Mostly because the game just don't even work on XONE (my preordered copy is collecting dust on a shelf as I type this), also because they promised something so complex and deep, and what we got was just an average open-world game! A waste of money, sorry ,wallet. It doesn't matter if I upgrade to nextgen Xbox Series, the game will still be underwhelming.
This game is similar to every Bethesda made game since Skyrim. Impressive open world, decent side quests and some good characters but everything else is as shallow as a puddle
Yeah, this game has 0 replay value and personally those are the types of games I hate the most. If the game was actually marketed as what is is, an interactive story game, I wouldn't feel the way I do about it. Mainly because I wouldn't have even thought about buying this game for a second.
I feel like they're doing too little too late. Hopefully the next update(s) will include actual fixes to gameplay elements, but I see very little reason from CDPR to believe that anymore.
People always say that in every game that has a problematic release. If you don't want to play it, don't. People who enjoyed the game and are excited like me will definitely appreciate them doing anything at all instead of pulling an Anthem. These things understandably take time. A lot longer than just people commenting "too little too late" in reaction. Also, every single update up to this point has been fixes to various game-breaking elements. What exactly are you even referring to? The only thing I can think of is AI, which has already been stated to be addressed in future patches.
As long as people care enough to comment about it on their own time, the game will be fine. The only thing that will kill a game is indifference, and there's still people who both love and hate this game.
I see a first hands down attempt to make the game playable. More of that and it'll become what it was promised to be or at least close enough that people won't complain
@@Zaffie- and that’s the issue, people like you appreciate them for throwing you bread crumbs. They cannot fix the shallow open world, brain dead AI, and various gameplay “elements” that should of been in the game from the start without major expansions.
@@natedog12boss "pEoplE lIKe YoU" Get a grip, man. I just enjoy the game and didn't experience as many bugs as many other people have. I stop playing the game, and when something new is added, I come back. I'm waiting for the game to improve just like everyone else. Only difference between me and you is i'm not overly pessimistic and not quick to put meaningless labels on people who don't agree with me like an ill-tempered child. "People like me" may not hop on a hate filled bangwagon, but "people like you" tend to never get anything productive done within a community and never have anything constructive to say that would potentially make the game better. It's okay for other people to like the game even if you don't.
I got it (PC) a week ago on sale. Its not bad actually. Pretty solid. It's worth playing now tbh, it's not likely to change significantly in the future, you will be waiting forever.
Both times the cyber psycho dies at 7:50 it's because the straps holding the pallet together that they were beside let go, allowing the cargo to collapse on them, which I believe is an instant kill. Not sure what triggered it in the first clip, but you shot it the 2nd time.
I lucky to only have a few glitches. All of them were npc based like not facing the right direction in idle animation during convos, spawning out of nowhere, and my fav dead or knocked out people standing up speaking or moving then falling back down..
I was one of the fools who pre ordered the game. After completing the story mode and spending 30 hrs I made up my mind to check back after 6-7 months. And after watching this video I can safely say I'll not be playing it anytime before August 2022.
Me too. The game has nearly half of the things they promised, and I got mine for XONE. Perfomance sucks. Since day one, I must have a total of 10 minutes of play time.
Well, I have to say that I purchased the game today on Steam, have been playing for 3 and a half hours. It's probably too early to make an statement about the current state of the game, tho I need to say I haven't found a game crashing bug so far. Just few bugs like NPCs talking but not moving the mouth, Jackie and Dex (and it is not all the time on cinematics), and things like that. For the rest, it has been a pretty good experience so far. I'll made another statement update once I reach 30 hours of gameplay.
@@blorpgneezer8091 some guys like me have to work. Sorry. So far so pretty good, not yet 30 hours of gameplay, but 10, I went deeper in the campaign (haven't done side missions yet), not one meaningful bug so far. I enjoyed the game pretty much, the decision feels meaningful, the expressions on the face of the secondary characters were in place and I felt really immersive because of it. Combat feels great. I need to go deeper into Side missions and try the open world content, but about campaign, I give a 9/10 with the experience, bugs felt like a secondary thing and not the protagonist this time. (U know what I mean?) Cheers, will be updating soon.
@@abrahimali7167 20 hours of gameplay, pretty good so far. I have found couple minor bugs like the ones I found earlier (NPCs mouth not moving when talking), but so far so good with the main missions, haven't found a wall-traspassing bug nor a NPC stuck or getting through walls. Jackie do traspass a car once by walking, but there were no explosion nor damage from there (lol), he doesn't stuck on elevators (that was a common bug I noticed from video memes, that's fixed for sure, at least on PC) I do have to say motorcycle had some issues when trying to park in a certain place like not accelerating as supposed to, but this happened once in a specific parking place, nevertheless, the riding is good enough in general when traversing the map, some cars feels better than others, but this is probably on purpose for you to get better cars than default. I feel like sometimes there is no many cars on the road, until they apparently start to appear from afar, that was a bit odd, but you get used to it. Cars try to avoid you when you're on road, that's cool. And NPCs now when they first appear on your sight, the textures loads and you don't get to see the awful rendering textures for eternity as I saw in previous TH-cam videos. I tried some side missions, doing well enough, start to end of a couple of side ones. Conclusion for this far: bugs are like 20% of the whole experience that includes mouths not moving and similars, at least for me, not a game breaking experience because the rest of the cinematics, face animations and the writing are very well done and goes smoothly (you feel real people behind NPC sometimes like in a 3D movie with real actors), tho I did found a T-pose once in a cinematic but the game goes on from there recovering NPC original pose with not a single crash nor screen or cinematic getting frozen. I like the game so far, I thought it was going to be unplayable, but I found out it's pretty good. I met Keanu already, the game is starting to be more interesting now. 1.3 I think fixed a lot of crashes and it's getting better. If you are impatience, you can start from here on PC as I think is good enough now to start playing, but if you can wait a bit more, I believe a next patch will have even more things fixed. I'll write more soon... Thanks for reading.
I just want to let everyone know im playing No Mans Sky all the way through, for the the 3rd time since its horrible release... let that sink in, their game was almost perfected in less then a year after release, and its only getting better, for free
So a cyberpsycho who can take several shotgun hits right in the face at short range without stopping, is taken down by a couple of falling boxes. Makes perfect sense.
@@theslay66 Like the previous guy said, it's quite ridiculous (and kinda funny) but a very common game mechanic. I have played many games with similar functions and quite often the bosses aren't immune to them. Even in Borderlands you can sometimes run over boss enemies with your car that are as big as a house but the car will insta kill them :D
This game started off with a great story, excellent side quests, and fun character progression with unique combat. Now that they've cleaned up a lot of the bugs they can start improving the immersion and adding more content, and if they do that right I could see this becoming a genuinely great game
Game is still trash. The characters are not flushed out enough. The police are still awful, the perk system is still s*** it's not RPG at all, the AI is atrocious, tons of areas still missing.... It's still in alpha it seems.
I enjoyed bits and pieces of the story, but overall thought it was trash, especially the main story. Some of the side questlines were interesting, like the Aldecaldos, but that was about it for me, and the story is one thing we know they arent going to be able to improve because its written in stone.
im actually one of the people who put like 100hrs into the game early on, maybe because i had nothing better to do. And theres nothing at the moment to bring me back into it, maybe there never will be. 100hrs is already a decent amount/
Generally if a game has kept my attention for 100 hours I feel like I've got my money's worth. I've felt cheated by AAA games that I've played a free weekend trial of and just hated after two hours (hi there Ubisoft).
At first I thought cyberpunk was just glitchy at launch but I think this video really puts into perspective just how unfinished the game is to the point where cd is adding basic ai tweaks months after launch the game still seems like an early alpha
I want a main story that makes any of the other stuff people talk about all the time make sense. By the time the game cuts you loose _you have a timebomb in your head_ and only months to live at best. This is not where I imagine a character wanting to go get a haircut or shop for new furniture for their apartment. It's not a bad story as such but it's a terrible base for an immersive, open world rpg. Amazingly bad. Who cares about factions or buying a new car _when you have a bomb in your head?_ Who's going to say to themselves "Well, I'll probably be dead in a few weeks. Maybe it's time to check out the real-estate market,"? The game won't let you just ignore it either, because they gotta squeeze more of Keanu's bad, bad voice acting as often as they can to remind you. The Johnny Silverhand story, that should have been dlc. That is what people should be hoping to get down the road. The actual game story should have involved character building and getting to know the city. Y'know, the montage at the beginning. That 20 seconds should be the whole game. Without that, who cares?
8 months in they havent added and changed nearly the amount they promised they would. I am not even talking about release debacle here, but their post-release promises.
They sat at the desk and were like , you know what these shitfest game needs ,to make it less fun duuh , less money , lesss dmg and remove that hyperspeed exploit and force people to deal with our shitty ineffective diving
@@viewaskew7741 Nope. We payed for it, promises were made, not kept and now are making it harder to play and less rewarding. We are entitle to complain.
@@viewaskew7741 if you ordered a burger and it came to you uncooked wouldn't you complain? When you pay for something and arent given what was promised you have the right to be upset.
It really feels like a group of 5 people tried to make a AAA game and failed horribly. And now they have hired maybe another 5 to come in a help fix it.
This is going to be a good game in five years.
It'll be a good game but it's gonna take 2077 gigs
It already is
i mean...i feel it's gonna be the same as fallout 76 in a sense...it starts off being trash and all that at launch, but with enough time and with "DLC" expansion updates being rolled out, it'll become...decent enough...i mean, it won't be a masterpiece, but it'll at least be decent enough to play while only losing a fraction of your sanity and dignity compared to during launch.
At this rate Star Citizen will be released before this game is in a decent state.
I’d say by today’s standard it could be considered “good”
0:12 "There are a massive amount of bugfixes"
Meanwhile a shadowy mass consumes the screen whilst V performs the slowest reload known to man
My thoughts exactly... I never had these issues pre-patch.
Yeah, what is that shadow thing!?
@@networknomad5600 they existed but I could never recreate it to see it
@@keithfiredive a building trying to render in the background
Looks like some kind of bug with the RTX features where the sampling clears? I've never seen it before.
Wow, looks like the game is getting closer to release! When is the alpha coming out?
October
2077
This IS the alpha everyone is playing. The beta will be out "when it's ready", so, about 4-5 years. ;-)
STIL NO AI
my man
"it makes driving easier" immediately smashes into a guard rail
He said easier, not perfect xD
Baby steps I suppose
Remember it “makes driving easier”, it DOES NOT “make drivers better”.
He just can't drive
we're watching game development in real time lol this feels like a social experiment
GTA V online for ps3/360 vibes. That was a social experiment af. We all beta tested that game for free lol
maybe they're secretly vault-tec?
This is becoming the new norm. As long as gamers keep supporting these games devs will keep doing this.
This is not a bad idea at all as I am involved in a project that does actually this from the first day . Players ideas are directly implemented into the game system , yet it's nothing like refactoring and fixing-bugs when the game is already made - this is totally opposite approach and also players act like testers not like the creators.
@@EskiLdn it's not the devs fault man
It's the rushed deadlines,
Overall the companys fault
I am still looking forward to playing this for the first time whenever it's completely finished.
Me too
you'll be waiting til 2077
so... never
Yeh same
I’ll keep waiting as well, I would really like to play Cyberpunk someday
3:36 active camo: on
Enemies: blind
Character shadow: you ain’t gonna get rid of me that easily
Come on guys, it's just 56 years until we get the proper release we were promised.
2077
@@suprememate9818 i just came back from 76 its still nothing😪
Really makes your appreciate GTA 5 when I didn't even realize how good the minimap was
i think red dead 2 did the mini map perfectly
How about gta 3
Older GTA’s than that even did mini map zoom out… games like battlefield do it automatically for a decade now
@@kunaladhikari5215 GTA 3's minimap was so successful it was copied by actual GPS GUI software companies like TomTom and Garmin.
I recently went back to GTA, and the only problem with it for me is the controls.
Obvi it came out 3 generations ago. If it had a more modern feel to the controls, I would continue playing it because everything else is great on it.
They've definitely made enough money on the online portion of that game to update the controls if they aren't gonna release gta 6
The most hilarious thing about this whole debacle is the fact that they touted this incredible open world that was more advanced than any other open world in gaming and 8 months later we're watching them moving in baby steps towards the standard reached by GTA III 23 years ago.
Your comment do not make any sense.
@@Eametsa makes perfect sense of you aren't stupid
GTA 3 is 20 years old.
@@Xegethra and thats why its funny it genuinely has a better open world
@@samsara_miko Okay sure lol
this literally feels like a patreon game.
some patreon games are more stable.
@@Immolator772 and much much smaller... lol
@@Randarrradara This game is a disaster.
never seen a patreon game look this good
@@Randarrradara yes but they are made by 1 person.
I love how the Lighting and shadows load depending on the camera and can't even keep up. Like, they can't do the thing Carmack and Silverman figured out in the 90's.
Exactly this! So many bugs or poorly implemented features that other studios figured out 10,20 even 30 years ago.
It's a single player game, I understand balance but nerfing so much stuff so hard is really strange.
They once stated that they wanted to make it multiplayer like gtav online. Maybe they are still thinking about that?
@@dracoflame3921 But you’d have a separate balance for MP. You wouldn’t use the single player game as to host multiplayer.
@@dracoflame3921 the multiplayer comes at 2023 at the earliest, and id assume it would be balanced differently so they're just nerfing stuff cause they wanted to
@@dracoflame3921 i find it hard to believe that's still happening, and even if it still, they said it's going to be separate
@@dracoflame3921 some stuff you cant even work into a multiplayer game like the time slowing
Dang, they should have just called it: Cyberpunk 2077: Early Access. People might have been more forgiving about the bugs. To me it feels like a AAA Early Access title.
Honestly sticking a beta sticker or something on the game woulda saved a lot of headache
That's exactly what I was thinking. For Christ's sake fallout 76 has less bugs than this game and they both came out with the same amount of broken and are similar ages. To me it just seems like the devs still weren't ready to make a game as big as this, they either needed more experienced people or just more people in general.
I tried to argue with people that were rushed by corporate and impatient people. Their argument for being whiny about it was that they kept pushing back the date.
More like Pre-Alpha.
@@itsmehere1 bad management on both those cases.
If I saw Judy's gift in my apartment the first time I played when it was relevant I would have cried
Me too.
I just want the polished game we were promised pre-launch. It still seems way off from that. The world feels lifeless.
he he polished XD
You can't blame them tho
@@everythinghurts5853
Ofc not the marketing started so directora said they dont about the state of game
@@everythinghurts5853 you can't blame the *developers* you mean?
It will always be... this game has very serious issues that can’t just be patched or updated without changing what this game currently is.
When this game was released, People talks trash to me for saying I was going to wait to buy it. Said I’d get it for maybe $20 less a year after release. I got it for $10 at Best Buy this week.
I think you confused how much they actually would care about how much you bought the game for a year later...lol
Smart. I'll look into it, too.
@@MorrisseyMuse you’re the one confused, it isn’t about them.
@@CheesyCharlie I applaud you sir, I bought it end of July on steam and where I live it was like $6 or something, nada. And I actually really enjoyed the story, the music. Sure it has it's problems, but I'd have been happy paying $15 or so for it in its current state.
I paid 60 for it and 100% got my money's worth
It's crazy that this game has been out for this long, and they're still adding things like "cars will go around you". Rock Star are probably pissing themselves laughing.
Rockstar already create this type of games from 90ish maybe.. until now, so they had many experience and time spends on this genre, in other hand cd first time jump into this kind of games, witcher not count, because it's different era
@@budekman The Witcher definitely counts.
@@budekman even Rockstars First Open world 3d GTA, NEVER had bugs like this, maybe afew normal ones, but they MADE IT PROPERLY
i feel like their always laughing considering people spend money on gta online
This is CD reds first time doing a game like this cut them some slack at least they’re dedicated to fixing it
The reinforced tendons charged jump got nerfed so bad, it’s useless now.
Sucks. Parkour was sooooo fun but now it’s really limited..
Tbh that was half the reason it kept me playing, I treated the game as basically a “how cool can I make clearing out this area look” simulator, and the parkour/jump aspect was a big part of that.
Aw man, felt like the hulk, hopping over fences and onto rooftops. It made stealth/thievery quests really easy.
@@RifleEyez same here. I haven’t played it since
Pretty trash, as I was a Fist fighting machine and jumping on people was really fun
This game is shaping up to be a good game, eventually. Sadly it seems like that won't be until around when the game was suppose to be released - two years. Truly a triple A early access.
I'm still sad there's no factions part of this game. Like, sure there's the gangs but for the most part...You're on your own. You can't join and work up through Arasaka, or Millitech, or even MaxTac. I feel like that could have been super cool options for the ending, if you have the loyalty of, say, MaxTac and you'd be able to genuinely seige Arasaka Tower with their support. Fallout New Vegas style support from factions would add a really interesting twist to this game, so I'm sad it's not part of it.
The open world is extremely shallow.
@@lance1506 don’t give them a cop-out. They lacked any creativity when it came to designing any faction warfare.
I remember when they made it seem like you would be able to join a gang and your experience in the world would totally change based on it. They really gaped everyone and put it in dry.
@@lance1506 Mercenary role and a faction role can exist in the same game lol. Like, V basically joins the Aldecaldos if you help Panam. They just didnt make it explicit or give any faction benefits. So, its likely that they just didnt have the time to flesh out the faction/gang system.
They also said that wearing different types of clothing would influence your street rep and get different reactions from people/gangs depending on where you were in the city and what clothes you had on. Now all clothes are the same (just an armour value) and you just try to find something half decent looking with 3/4 mod slots.
1:47 - "It makes driving easier"
*Proceeds to fall off a hill*
It still don't fix human error
The minimap was fixed and its appreciated, but with some cars you still feel like youre driving on ice
fall of a hill? you should get your eyes checked.
@@SemperFine glad im not the only one who noticed
With perks, and weapon upgrades you can seriously make most of the weapons seriously OP. Especially high level characters.
I really hope that this ends up like another No Man's Sky situation, where it started out horrible but later on would become essentially what they promised if not better in some ways than what they promised. Considering the fact that CD Projekt Red actually apologized, and the new DLC, I have hope that will be the case and they can rebuild their reputation.
Not possible, since the underlying game is so lacklustre and mediocre, even if all the bugs are fixed it will never be what they promised.
@@randomloverofcheese I have to disagree with you there. The side missions are pretty solid and though the gameplay is definitely not the best(excluding bugs), it’s not absolutely horrendous. I personally don’t like many leveling mechanics in games but that’s more so personal opinion and pet peeve. At least it’s not like fallout 76 where they didn’t even include the most basic human NPC’s, and don’t have nearly as many bugs as 76 despite the memes (feel like the only reason 76 got a pass on some things is because of Bethesda’s reputation of bugs and “it’s a feature not a bug” meme). So it’s not THAT bad, and can definitely be reworked so long as the CD Projekt Red team actually works on the game and put devotion into it. Even if it takes years like No Man’s Sky did, it’s definitely doable, especially when compared to the number of people Hello Games has to CD Project Red.
Semi apologized.
In their apologies they still showed signs of deflecting and negating.
At time of release they officially said that "the finished game[at that point] was still better than anything shown previously in promo trailers."
paraphrasing here from memory.
@@Thefootqueen Fallout 76 basically is No Man's Sky as well at this point. Bethesda really improved the game, the dialogue trees are arguably better than Fallout 4
@@Humanaut.
1) Fair but they didn’t have to apologize at all, and frankly it is better than nothing. I’d rather have a half-baked apology than nothing at all. If it was any other company we would receive no apology.
2) Saying something is finished when it isn’t is honestly just business. Scummy business yeah but you can’t go out and say “oh no, it’s a buggy mess.” Especially when other companies you are working with and the platforms you work on are expecting it to be completed. Plus they didn’t have many options as it was, especially with the massive hype train and how angry people were getting because they kept delaying the game. Doesn’t excuse it at all just saying not many other options, the most they could do was attempt to lower people’s expectations, problem is price tags set expectations.
Shouldn't the minimap zoom level scale to how fast you're going like in GTA?
i dont think the devs are skilled enough for that.. sorta like teaching a monkey how to read.
@@austindailey29 I think they are capable, speaking as a dev myself, it really comes down to how the project is managed. My guess is the project managers wanted to get this out the door without proper testing(unit tests, integration tests, functional tests and acceptance testing). Without feedback from testing teams, the devs wouldn’t be be keen to things like map zoom changes for user convenience. At this point the public is pretty much the test team.
@@sealwithawkwardness3951 so pretty much everything wrong with CDPR boils down to shitty management? Sounds about right
@@sealwithawkwardness3951 if you work on open world games, you should at least play games from the competition, no excuse here
@@RalfBelmont I'm not saying they are competent or incompetent. From my point of view as a software developer, a lot of factors like management, funding and deadlines come into play.
I could for example want to put in a really great feature into a project, however all that needs to be approved by project managers and needs to be funded. Else I'd just be doing it on my own time not getting paid for the work. We basically focus on the main features first then have minor re-adjustments later.
Things like game breaking bugs could even be swept under the rug because it just "works" most of the time, and therefore a project manager could just say "it's good enough we should just push for our release deadline."
I also don't want to rag on managers that much, there's a good number that are great at it. But I'm willing to bet this game was poorly managed.
Its funny how NPC still look at you and move their heads to track you, even tho you're invisible
You also still cast a shadow while invisible...
Imagine some rando who’s completely ignorant to the complexities of game development/debugging dismissing your hundreds of hours of work. I feel more sympathy for them then some douchebag complaining about their third world game problem.
just like in skyrim and fallout 4 when you have cloaking armor, the npc's are like "where did they go?" while looking you straight in the eye. weirdly oblivion got this right, if you have enchanted armor that cloaks you, the npc's run around confused not aware of where you are. there should be a global flag set to tell the AI to ignore the player, and disable head tracking whenever your invisible, they would probably have to set this for every type of npc in the game, so idk maybe they just haven't gotten around to it since they had dozens of other things to fix?
@@ContentPlugs If you’re invisible, then light does pass through you. That’s how it works. You can only see things because of light, and if you see through something it’s because the light doesn’t scatter towards your eyes. If you have a shadow… then the light hitting you bounces off of you… which means you are visible. Why would the light all around you pass through you, except for the light above you from the sun? No light rays should bounce off of you, so you should not have a shadow. It’s like shining a flashlight on glass… why would you see a shadow on the other side of the light pases through it.
@@stuckylar I worded it weird but it defends on how the invisibility would work. I.e camouflage or whatever the case may be. Assuming it’s cyberpunk the light would reflect off some kind of material
I get the impression Cyberpunk really saved allot of gamers from a wave of post-covid buggy games. The massive number of games that seem to have been delayed shows that it has at least taught developers an important lesson that last minute patching only goes so far.
But the case of Cyberpunk can also teach other devs you can make big money on overpromising and get away with it.
@@johanndaart7326 the best part of this people still defending you for that..
@@johanndaart7326 They made those money only thanks to Witcher 3. That was foundation for the whole Cyberpunk hype. Their next game will not sell so many copies before launch. That's sure.
It didn’t ‘teach’ the anything, it just made them aware for a little time
@@johanndaart7326 Yes and no. Getting pulled from the playstation store HURT CDPR and upset their investors in a big way. Remember that investors and big companies don't focus on initial box sales anymore. They want infinitely recurrent revenue so even if CP2077 sold a lot of units initially they missed out on planned revenue for later in the year. Other companies don't want to make that mistake. Now I think the gameplan is to overhype and overpromise, but not so much that the stock price goes down on release.
Bro, when you were fighting the cyber psycho and he was "mysteriously dying" , it's cuz you dropped those boxes above his head onto him both times 😂
I might buy this game six years from now, when it's done.
Bought it full price at release. Played trough on pc and it was quite solid.
if it's done*
I brought it in advance so it’ll be worth more in 3 years when it’s finished 😂
Cyberpunk 2077, 2027 edition
by that time, your hdd's will be full i can't take any more XXGB "patches"...
Having the minimap rendering connected to the actual geometry rendered on-screen is the most glaring indicator of how jank their implementation is. I mean, FFS, we had games with functional minimaps 30 cocking years ago. I myself implemented a labyrinth-like game with a minimap on my 2nd year in college, after 8-10 OpenGL lectures.
rendered to actual geometry only really makes sense for procedurally generated games. they should just remake the entire minimap in .vector /illustrator than just update the position over the vector depending on the players x,z position. would take them less than a week id reckon,you could probably do it in a day of 2-3
maybe it was done because there is a lot of verticality in the game, and they needed a way to put 3d level design on a 2d plane.
@@sginrummy88 Once you've got a level designed, you can just run a virtual camera over it from above. That's a basic full world map, then you just sync the minimap position to the player position. Skim the camera through at any "level" and repeat. To get the stylized map they've got here, either manual tracing over the top of that full world image (it doesn't take as long as you think) or you can use laplace algorithms to detect edges. The reason realtime geometry is used here, is that the minimap will never need to be updated again; anything new added will be automatically added. It seems like the developers have always struggled with numbers/skillsets of their developers, so it is more of an efficiency choice rather than any technical reason.
@@sginrummy88 You could do this by making multiple image slices vertically of the map, and based on your z change what shows on minimap. There are a lot of simple ways to work around the issue.
@@TheIndieGamesNL I dont understand why they cant do that? it seems so fucking obvious. I know nothing about coding or game development but surely the map is just an image that tracks where you are? not an actual representation of the ingame world?
There is only one thing I really wanna see changed and that's max ammo. I hate not having enough ammo to just run around and shoot. If I can hold over 6k cans of fucking soda I can hold over 6k rounds of assault rifle ammo.
agreed, shotgun ammo in particular seems really constrained
as someone who has been in real life battle and run out of ammo I fully agree with you :) never too much ammo!!! and on top of that we are talking rounds like you point out and a soda can is heavier than most bullets.
@Archer Cillian yeah, there was a few times I looked at my ammo and realized that the risk vs reward wasnt worth it. I been working on a gunslinger build that makes me dangerous with almost every weapon. With that when im in a fight and run out of ammo, I can use the enemies with no issues and still dishing out alot of damage
@Archer Cillian "not just rely on one gun"
You like that, good. I hate it. When I find a gun I like I want to use only that gun. It should be an option, with a perk or something. As a developer you shouldn't stifle players freedom!
You know you can craft ammo right?
3:13 "You will go completely cloaked, and become invisible!"
Walks up to an npc "completely invisible", and NPC is following your every move.
If you saw a shimmering in the air moving about, you'd follow it too. You're not completely invisible.
@@Kazeromaru you are eithere invisible or not invisible.
You could be different grades of cloaked, but he said you will become completely cloaked and invisible.
Mostly in videogames if you are supposed to be invisible, they make an outline of some sort to help the player see which weapons or items they are currently using.
If the player in this clip is just as "invisible" as it is portrayed, the AI is obviously even worse, as they dont care to do anything with the floating plasma person in front of them.
@@Kazeromaru you don't shimmer when you go invisible. Light doesn't bounce off of you, but just ignores you and goes through you (you become air). By shimmer, if you meant the hologram kind of hands and gun that you saw in the FPV, that's just for the player's reference, the in game world doesn't see it.
Their intern is doing really well recently, cant wait till the whole team joins in!
If it took them 8 months to only fix this much, I imagine it'll actually take them till 2077 to actually fully fix the game.
yeah well what do you think the 2077 refers to?
@@MisterDillPickle it was so obvious from the start, foreshadowing being relatively obvious
The core story still has issues I don't think bug fixes can help with
@@briangiese2628 No it doesn't and your mother loves you but doesn't like you.
iam not sure that in 2077 this game still exist
You were talking about how a bunch of bugs had been fixed while on screen the most interesting shadow mishap was happening.
It's mesmerizing.
Great recap though! Thanks for explaining all the changes.
What's with you and games that take place during and after 2077 lol jk I love your fallout Shorts
Can I join the Enclave?
@@thomascron4011 What can I say? Its the time to be alive haha
Mantis! Hey
Love u mantis 🥺
lol. I'm so used to the disappearing enemies from the Saints Row series that enemies disappearing when you look away feels like normal.
This is going to be like No Man's Sky redemption story. I still have faith in CD Projekt Red that they going to fix it well.
That’s a tall order. Hello Games was a new IP coming from a studio that flooded during NMS development that stuck with their game to become one of the more beloved IPs out there. CDPR has the opposite problem. They’re riding off the massive success of the Witcher series and W3 in particular. Time is moving past this game and I’m sure one of these years they will reach that final stage but we will have all moved on by then. Could this be the downfall of CDPR perhaps?
The problem is that its not multiplayer. It was advertised as one of the biggest if not the biggest single player story driven rpg game ever made and once that first impression hit everyone, it was over.
@@Sailor1010 It feels to me like there is STILL a ton of work to do to get anywhere near a completed product. I honestly don't think I have ever seen a game with so many weird bugs and so much cut content. And now it has a bunch of new bugs and some of the original ones back.
Honestly I either think they will move on and try and PR their way out of this, or they will bankrupt themselves trying to redeem CP2077.
The age old saying rings true about this game "It'll be good in 2077!"
A rushed game is never good. A delayed game is eventually good. They dropped the ball so hard there is no amount of updates that is going to fix this game. It’s bad at the core.
I mean, at this rate it’ll only be good in 2077 comparatively because the earth will probably be a heat blasted ruin with scattered pockets of ppl huddled around surviving tech playing whatever’s left to escape reality.
Fun fact in fallout thats when the great war happens. Fitting that when the game gets good we'll all embrace that glow of adam
@@fromthefire4176 What?!
@@RiderZer0 no mans sky
about the cyberpsycho on 7:40: he dies because you dropped the crates on his head both times xD
"I dont know how smart AI actuatly is" Somehow I would argue which one is smarter
That moment just baffled me.
💀
People still don't seem to know that the boxes are an instant knockout device, it's amazing lol
xD
19:26 my face when i still see all these bugs happening.
>Free DLC is basically 3 cosmetic items and an NPC skin
>New car is fucking terrible and easily outclassed by most others around the same pricetag
>Neither Jacket looks as good as some of the Unique legendaries or Iconics already in-game and obscures shirt underneath
>New Johnny skin is fucking awful
>Driving still sucks and anything even remotely fast skids all over the place for zero reason
>F key is still hardbound to select and interact for some functions and requires manually editing the config file to properly rebind for left-handed people
>Crash revolver still stuck in my inventory and flagged as a quest item despite finishing the questline, recieving all texts and finishing the interactions
>My Archangel revolver lost ~500 DPS going from 1200 to 700
>Lack of optimization means the game still chugs like an alcoholic locomotive on anything but top-of-the-line hardware
>Beat on the Brat quests still absolute garbage with teleporting enemies and broken hitboxes for no reward
>Still no in-game customization for cars, clothes, or players
>My faster reload perks now only work around 50% of the time making rifle reloads godawful
>Switching weapons still takes an eternity and sometimes switches to the wrong weapon slot
>Weapon wheel is finicky and hard to use for MnK players
Don't buy this game. End of story. There's too much wrong to fix and making DLC will cost too much to be worth it for the developer. I predict it will be abandoned shortly after the 1 year anniversary and CDPR will quietly move on to a new Witcher-related project to try and make sales on what little goodwill is left over from Witcher 3
The minimap resets when you move up a level vertically. So like a ramp to a new part of a city or area.
Just thought id mention that.
Its sad that this game will never be what it was meant to or what was advertised, no matter how much patchs or dlcs, the game at its core its just different from what they said and thats a shame, i expected more from them after TW3
I was expecting a visual downgrade on the Ps4/Xbox along with some bugs and less pedestrians on the streets for performance and stuff but even if they fix those things your initial life path doesn’t really add anything besides dialogue options. factions would have been cool and with the gangs could work great.
@@DOODOOBUTT_ not only that, they promised a huge open world rpg with a lot of choices and the game is more like a linear shooter looter with few choices
PS5 is 60 frames & the new patch looks good 👍
@@ConservativeJuggaloPodcast i wasnt talking about performance, the game is just different from what cdpr said, in a bad way
@@xzaxx809 I'm waiting for a physical ps5 copy, I havnt played but I've watched some videos on how it runs on different consoles
This really looks like a good step in the right direction as someone who has played some of the game during launch and taking a break from it hopefully I can return back early next year
I bought the game hoping they would fix it. I played through a couple missions then stopped. As soon as they make the city more lively by adding more npcs walking around or events. I might consider playing more.
Same man. I have it but I'll play it when it's done.
are you playing on console? cos i see npcs walking around all over
I wish they had random world events that just happen
I'm just glad CDPR isn't abandoning the game. Albiet i do heavily believe it deserves to be marked as "Early Access" due to how broken the game has been for such a long time.
Edit: I wasn't expecting over 180 likes! Thankyou!
Also, Cyberpunk isn't a bad game, just a game that deserved to have been delayed by another year or two. Than launch into Early Access if it's still riddled with bugs.
Agreed i am fortunate to have an 3070 the game is enjoyable but it’s still broken!!! Amount bugs I found are insane, wish they had more funding for a 2021 release even 2022.
Yeah at least they aren't bailing like Bioware did with Mass Effect Andromeda.
That’s funny because I want them to just abandon it and work on something else. I think it’s a lost cause haha. But I get your point, I’m just somewhat pessimistic about this whole game after all this time.
The devs suck so hard
What CDPR should do is rerelease Cyberpunk 2077 called Cyberpunk 2077: Definitive Edition with everything fixed and ready to go
This is the game that will stop me ever buying a new game on day 1 again.
@Prince Smith TLoU2 was pretty buggy upon release, perhaps just my experience though.
@Prince Smith no, he's right, this was the game, I loved it though gonna go play again now :)
Smart
@Prince Smith None. I will not buy a game on day 1 again, no matter how high profile the AAA developer is.
I have too large a backlog of games as it is anyway.
@Prince Smith Really? You really going to try and place some blame on gamers for the state of the game at release? Nobody told CDPR to announce the release date in the first place. They could have waited until the game was actually ready before announcing a launch date. Shocker that when you announce a launch date, gamers correctly assume that the game will be ready on that day. Most people understand that delays happen, again CDPR provided the dates, not gamers. If they needed a year, they should have said they needed a year, it happens in gaming. Instead, they lied and said they needed just a little more time to "polish" the game. They delayed the game three times, once after they had promised it would be ready. It was at that point that people "were right up their noses bugging them" because something didn't smell right with the multiple delays and people were rightfully worried and suspicious. There is no blame other than we as gamers have to stop giving developers the benefit of doubt and pre-ordering games at all.
Knives that are for throwing deserves its own slot since every time you throw them you need to re-equip another knife in the menu and that kinda messes up the "flow" of the game, you feel me?
I like how they have police cars but the police don’t actually use them they just teleport near you
Hopefully in a years time the game will start seeing the polish finally being applied
I do want to play the game but I'm waiting on the "full" release
"Seeing the Polish" I see what you did there.
I'm in the same boat. really wanna play this game but know its not worth diving in right away. gives me time to get a good graphics card to fully appreciate it
It'll never live up to its own hype
Atleast they’re trying their best to work out the issues. Unlike most companies
@@Sumea_Saukko true, however the problem isn't as simple as "The game got fixed so everyone is happy!".
There are many people who had invested in the development of this game. Since the sales didn't make up, those people are in a loss. Now by the time the game fixes the inflation and Steam sale will not help them get as much money.
Secondly the trust issues. Until now CDPR was seen on the same level as Rockstar, which will make flawless masterpieces. Now when the next CDPR game comes (Witcher IV for example) people will not pre-order it the way they did for Cyberpunk.
And finally the long term updates. Most games which redeem themselves do it after years of updates. No Man's Sky took 5 years to redeem itself, while Fallout 76 has taken 3 years and still not redeemed itself. Now if there were any plans of a Cyberpunk sequel, they have to go to rest until this game fixes itself. And No Man's Sky and Fallout 76 weren't as hyped as Cyberpunk 2077, so this game will take even longer to redeem itself. It really pains me to say this, but this game will still be considered bad for at least the next three years.
Though there's hope, since they have been patching things up real quick. Let's hope it becomes the next No Man's Sky instead of the next Marvel's Avengers.
The "Contrast Shadows" toggle in the graphics menu controls "the darkness" creeping across the screen. Turning it off, go back to game, then turning it back on fixes this bug. But only on a per-life basis, it can come back if you die and respawn.
Nah just make sure DLSS isn't set to auto.
@@SmallfryRie I dont use DLSS. I have a 2080ti and can render 1080p@120Hz with no prob. And I still encountered and solved this bug.
Reflections off wet surfaces have been removed
You mean "contact shadows"? That's interesting.
@@dciking I just turned my DLSS to balanced and that fixed it for me. This game runs so much better with DLSS on. You get way more frames idc what GPU you have. Lol.
It's difficult to understand how they released a game that has spawning/despawning set up the way Cyberpunk does. It's even more difficult to understand how they haven't addressed that already. But, hey! Sometimes you'll find a cat in the shower now so that's super dope.
now so that's super dope. Sometimes you "ll find a cat in the shower haven't addressed that already. But, hey! more diffcult to understand how they set up the way (Cyberpunk does lt's even a game that has spawning / despawning lt's diffcult to understand how they released hink so thnks the of it was ever des cur evair you que that beys thin conters Cyberpunk the to way cunds qwers que you it's in on aszin
But.. cours the they ast persin
Imagine this game was third person and seeing your character's best customization stats be a suit top, with jogging pants and a silly helmet for the entire game. Bad enough seeing him on a bike !!!... I swear this game was made by no one who worked on the Witcher 3.
True indeed. The people who made the witcher 3 left the company after blood and wine. And that's it, the cdpr magic is gone ...... forever.
i love how he refers to random people in cars as "enemies"
It’s the sigma killbillions-aire grindset
Also called civilians walking down the sidewalk enemies as well.
Considering he's randomly gunning in the street and crashing through cars, NPCs probably are his main enemies.
The amount of bugs shown in this clips even when he's not talking about them is ridiculous...
I know... NPCs randomly popping up, cars textures not rendered, altough yuo're cloaked NPCs look at you without shooting.......... unbelieveable.
What with that shadow i keep seeing moving across the screen
I've never seen such an array of frankly bizarre bugs in a game that's had this many patches ever.
“It makes a lot of sense”
Me: *unable to understand anything*
The UI and driving. Drives me insane in this game.
„Rellay impoves driving.“
Proceeds to rampage and ram every car.
last generation console hardware is a boat anchor for progress, it's holding the development back so much. I wish they just ditched the old gen versions
I agree I mean it seems mean because not everyone got next gen but at the same time that's there problem
Yeah they should forget about last-gen and move on.
That wouldn't have changed anything. They prioritized new gen so much, they didn't know their own game was a dumpster fire on the previous gen until they were burning copies.
I’m starting to agree. Though next gen still very hard to buy, not to mention they are still being sold with a limited supply.
Only if they're prepared to refund everyone or deal with paying them out more via a class-action lawsuit.
Regardless, I bought the game new for my PS4 Slim and had no bugs, which was odd seeing as how I seem to be a rare case. But I also recently bought a "physical" copy for PC so I can ramp up the quality, mod it, etc since it runs the best on that platform.
1:45 "It makes driving easier"
*CRASHES*
Pedant mode : ON
The new minimap doesn't make _driving_ any easier, it makes _navigation_ easier.
It’s crazy, when I played the game back in December I had an almost bug and glitch free experience (on PC). Such a great game, I’m so sorry for everyone who really struggled with bugs
Me too. My game didn’t get buggy until I patched…
@@screenwriter7094 Same for me as well. No serious bugs or glitches at all in 350+ hours of play the first month or so the game was out. Some minor funny stuff that did not hurt anything and then the updates started happening which were focused for consoles and started to hurt PC in the process. Pop-in got worse with almost zero fps increase in performance. Bugs and glitches i never had started to happen cause of patches mainly intended to help consoles.
It’s not a great game. That’s a fact. Bugs aren’t the only issues and if you think that’s the main reason for why people hate it then you’re ignorant or dumb
@@pixelhand9421 You are absolutely right, I have a feeling a lot of people made it their hobby to cry on the internet about the issues of games. I'm sure a lot of them didn't even play the game and just follow the trend of complaining
This game feels like a fever dream, or a tear from another timeline that we weren't meant to see. At this point they could fix the game 100% and I still would feel sick about the tragedy that was Cyberpunks release.
How the mighty have fallen.
I wonder if they ever expected it to be the full experience this game. The first Watchdogs was a good game but not everything it could've been. They love releasing games that hold back nowadays so the sequel seems better.
@@ryansizemore5064 Scumbags being what scumbags do, milking rather than providing.
I can’t be an art dealer anymore?! Well that contagion play through I was planning is definitely off the table.
NOOO i guess i don't have a source of income anymore
Thank you for wasting my time instead of keeping it short... i just want to hear the big changes and no bullshite
Cdpr made it seem like this game was gonna be a next gen new Vegas and It turned out to be a shallow borderlands clone. I’m still mad
I'm still mad too. Mostly because the game just don't even work on XONE (my preordered copy is collecting dust on a shelf as I type this), also because they promised something so complex and deep, and what we got was just an average open-world game!
A waste of money, sorry ,wallet.
It doesn't matter if I upgrade to nextgen Xbox Series, the game will still be underwhelming.
This game is similar to every Bethesda made game since Skyrim. Impressive open world, decent side quests and some good characters but everything else is as shallow as a puddle
@@no-barkthechosenone2436 Nah. Even Skyrim had much more content. Guards could chase you!
Yeah, this game has 0 replay value and personally those are the types of games I hate the most. If the game was actually marketed as what is is, an interactive story game, I wouldn't feel the way I do about it. Mainly because I wouldn't have even thought about buying this game for a second.
Just go play New Vegas
I feel like they're doing too little too late. Hopefully the next update(s) will include actual fixes to gameplay elements, but I see very little reason from CDPR to believe that anymore.
People always say that in every game that has a problematic release. If you don't want to play it, don't. People who enjoyed the game and are excited like me will definitely appreciate them doing anything at all instead of pulling an Anthem. These things understandably take time. A lot longer than just people commenting "too little too late" in reaction.
Also, every single update up to this point has been fixes to various game-breaking elements. What exactly are you even referring to? The only thing I can think of is AI, which has already been stated to be addressed in future patches.
As long as people care enough to comment about it on their own time, the game will be fine. The only thing that will kill a game is indifference, and there's still people who both love and hate this game.
I see a first hands down attempt to make the game playable. More of that and it'll become what it was promised to be or at least close enough that people won't complain
@@Zaffie- and that’s the issue, people like you appreciate them for throwing you bread crumbs. They cannot fix the shallow open world, brain dead AI, and various gameplay “elements” that should of been in the game from the start without major expansions.
@@natedog12boss "pEoplE lIKe YoU"
Get a grip, man. I just enjoy the game and didn't experience as many bugs as many other people have. I stop playing the game, and when something new is added, I come back. I'm waiting for the game to improve just like everyone else. Only difference between me and you is i'm not overly pessimistic and not quick to put meaningless labels on people who don't agree with me like an ill-tempered child. "People like me" may not hop on a hate filled bangwagon, but "people like you" tend to never get anything productive done within a community and never have anything constructive to say that would potentially make the game better.
It's okay for other people to like the game even if you don't.
(12:50) "if you take that out, you won't be able to put it back in"... wait what are we talking about again?
i like the ensuing darkness not being addressed until way later in the video. I thought you were being chased by hover cars
Waiting for new game plus to be added. One playthrough for each life path, one of them being a 100% run. I need something actually new in the game.
I *might* buy it if we do get NG+.
@@alenmack3471 Why use "We" if you don't own the game? haha
@@guts1224 "we" as in "we the gamers" not the retards who actually bought this piece of unfinished trash?
@@lars9805 excuse me?
Wow, you must've incredible patience to achieve that considering the bugs.
7:45 He didn't kill himself, you killed him with the box trap in both situations.
yeah the first time with hacking and the second time with shooting the "rope"
cut one bug, two takes its place LUL love the update video man
Him: "Makes driving easier"
Also him: *Hits wall*
Still have this game sealed in my drawer waiting for the day a patch makes it immersive enough for me to play
I got it (PC) a week ago on sale. Its not bad actually. Pretty solid. It's worth playing now tbh, it's not likely to change significantly in the future, you will be waiting forever.
PS5 is 60 frames all day
@@jonathanbowen3640 I highly suggest uninstalling it and waiting a few years untill the last update is made. Then play it.
Havent touched this game in a whole year
@@Ceber911 bruh it hasn’t even been a year since it’s release…..
I'll come back when the game is out of alpha.
They should give it to Rockstar team to fix lol
Both times the cyber psycho dies at 7:50 it's because the straps holding the pallet together that they were beside let go, allowing the cargo to collapse on them, which I believe is an instant kill. Not sure what triggered it in the first clip, but you shot it the 2nd time.
I lucky to only have a few glitches. All of them were npc based like not facing the right direction in idle animation during convos, spawning out of nowhere, and my fav dead or knocked out people standing up speaking or moving then falling back down..
I was one of the fools who pre ordered the game. After completing the story mode and spending 30 hrs I made up my mind to check back after 6-7 months. And after watching this video I can safely say I'll not be playing it anytime before August 2022.
I think many people got tricked on that day my friend.
Me too.
The game has nearly half of the things they promised, and I got mine for XONE. Perfomance sucks. Since day one, I must have a total of 10 minutes of play time.
Am I the only one whos bothered by a lack of gloves in this game?
And hand tattoos
Yessss and visable sleeves on jackets! Why cant i see my sleeves!
And toenail polish
On PC there are mods for all of that…
Get Gorilla arms, kinda works
Well, I have to say that I purchased the game today on Steam, have been playing for 3 and a half hours. It's probably too early to make an statement about the current state of the game, tho I need to say I haven't found a game crashing bug so far. Just few bugs like NPCs talking but not moving the mouth, Jackie and Dex (and it is not all the time on cinematics), and things like that. For the rest, it has been a pretty good experience so far. I'll made another statement update once I reach 30 hours of gameplay.
Well? Its been 2 days
@@blorpgneezer8091 some guys like me have to work. Sorry. So far so pretty good, not yet 30 hours of gameplay, but 10, I went deeper in the campaign (haven't done side missions yet), not one meaningful bug so far. I enjoyed the game pretty much, the decision feels meaningful, the expressions on the face of the secondary characters were in place and I felt really immersive because of it. Combat feels great. I need to go deeper into Side missions and try the open world content, but about campaign, I give a 9/10 with the experience, bugs felt like a secondary thing and not the protagonist this time. (U know what I mean?) Cheers, will be updating soon.
@@DavidJMunoz-kn2qh next one?
@@abrahimali7167 20 hours of gameplay, pretty good so far. I have found couple minor bugs like the ones I found earlier (NPCs mouth not moving when talking), but so far so good with the main missions, haven't found a wall-traspassing bug nor a NPC stuck or getting through walls. Jackie do traspass a car once by walking, but there were no explosion nor damage from there (lol), he doesn't stuck on elevators (that was a common bug I noticed from video memes, that's fixed for sure, at least on PC) I do have to say motorcycle had some issues when trying to park in a certain place like not accelerating as supposed to, but this happened once in a specific parking place, nevertheless, the riding is good enough in general when traversing the map, some cars feels better than others, but this is probably on purpose for you to get better cars than default. I feel like sometimes there is no many cars on the road, until they apparently start to appear from afar, that was a bit odd, but you get used to it. Cars try to avoid you when you're on road, that's cool. And NPCs now when they first appear on your sight, the textures loads and you don't get to see the awful rendering textures for eternity as I saw in previous TH-cam videos.
I tried some side missions, doing well enough, start to end of a couple of side ones.
Conclusion for this far: bugs are like 20% of the whole experience that includes mouths not moving and similars, at least for me, not a game breaking experience because the rest of the cinematics, face animations and the writing are very well done and goes smoothly (you feel real people behind NPC sometimes like in a 3D movie with real actors), tho I did found a T-pose once in a cinematic but the game goes on from there recovering NPC original pose with not a single crash nor screen or cinematic getting frozen. I like the game so far, I thought it was going to be unplayable, but I found out it's pretty good. I met Keanu already, the game is starting to be more interesting now. 1.3 I think fixed a lot of crashes and it's getting better. If you are impatience, you can start from here on PC as I think is good enough now to start playing, but if you can wait a bit more, I believe a next patch will have even more things fixed. I'll write more soon... Thanks for reading.
I just want to let everyone know im playing No Mans Sky all the way through, for the the 3rd time since its horrible release... let that sink in, their game was almost perfected in less then a year after release, and its only getting better, for free
The Cyberphsyco died because the boxes fell on him.
Consider it a gift.
Finally someone said something. I was livid when he was like "idk y he died". Like dude, you killed him with the boxes you dumbtard
Realism
@@raptortodd Livid.....really?
@@raptortodd either way it's dumb they died from mere boxes.
You seriously didn't see twice in a row that the cyber psychos were knocked out because of those boxes?
right???
Yeah, dunno how that was missed
So a cyberpsycho who can take several shotgun hits right in the face at short range without stopping, is taken down by a couple of falling boxes. Makes perfect sense.
@@theslay66 I mean it's ridiculous sure but it's considered an environment trap, and most env. traps in games are insta kills
@@theslay66 Like the previous guy said, it's quite ridiculous (and kinda funny) but a very common game mechanic. I have played many games with similar functions and quite often the bosses aren't immune to them.
Even in Borderlands you can sometimes run over boss enemies with your car that are as big as a house but the car will insta kill them :D
the cyberpsycho at 7:40 dies because you end up dropping the crates on his head
4:58 - 6:20 oh my god Judy, why do you have to be so perfect?
This game started off with a great story, excellent side quests, and fun character progression with unique combat. Now that they've cleaned up a lot of the bugs they can start improving the immersion and adding more content, and if they do that right I could see this becoming a genuinely great game
But let's be honest, they probably won't.
@@AllardRT it'll be payed expansion but they will
@@AllardRT Hoping they do. I really wanna see the game get better so it can stop getting so much hate.
Game is still trash. The characters are not flushed out enough. The police are still awful, the perk system is still s*** it's not RPG at all, the AI is atrocious, tons of areas still missing.... It's still in alpha it seems.
I enjoyed bits and pieces of the story, but overall thought it was trash, especially the main story. Some of the side questlines were interesting, like the Aldecaldos, but that was about it for me, and the story is one thing we know they arent going to be able to improve because its written in stone.
im actually one of the people who put like 100hrs into the game early on, maybe because i had nothing better to do. And theres nothing at the moment to bring me back into it, maybe there never will be. 100hrs is already a decent amount/
and thats so sad bc you were just a loyal fan who wanted to play day 1 and CDPR basically fucked over all their loyal fans.
Generally if a game has kept my attention for 100 hours I feel like I've got my money's worth. I've felt cheated by AAA games that I've played a free weekend trial of and just hated after two hours (hi there Ubisoft).
@@andrewambrusko3651 what ? 100 hours is great value for your money in singleplayer game
I'm almost 200 hours lol, the grind is dumb but the aesthetics are so good.
me too man, i still see my character going into space without johnny boy. it sucks, johnny left us and so did the game.
"I was actually pretty close to these cars" ***Ramming into a low res car***
"cars can go around you !" we truly live in amazing times
he just started calling NPCs "enemies" partway through the vid.
Remember, no russian
@@Th0rn5555 Hahaha, best comment!
Joker moment
the way I play is if it can be killed it is an enemy
@@JuiceHead3 like the way you think.
so excited to play this game when they finally finish development and launch the non-beta version!
At first I thought cyberpunk was just glitchy at launch but I think this video really puts into perspective just how unfinished the game is to the point where cd is adding basic ai tweaks months after launch the game still seems like an early alpha
Bro, not even 500GB update could fix this mess
I want a main story that makes any of the other stuff people talk about all the time make sense. By the time the game cuts you loose _you have a timebomb in your head_ and only months to live at best. This is not where I imagine a character wanting to go get a haircut or shop for new furniture for their apartment. It's not a bad story as such but it's a terrible base for an immersive, open world rpg. Amazingly bad. Who cares about factions or buying a new car _when you have a bomb in your head?_ Who's going to say to themselves "Well, I'll probably be dead in a few weeks. Maybe it's time to check out the real-estate market,"? The game won't let you just ignore it either, because they gotta squeeze more of Keanu's bad, bad voice acting as often as they can to remind you. The Johnny Silverhand story, that should have been dlc. That is what people should be hoping to get down the road. The actual game story should have involved character building and getting to know the city. Y'know, the montage at the beginning. That 20 seconds should be the whole game. Without that, who cares?
absolutely based
Everything is good except the Jonny silver hand part the voice acting was good.
Couldn't agree more. Just give me the name of my first fixer and cut me loose, could care less about the Johnny arc.
📠📠📠
Disagree totally, this is a Cyberpunk story not a GTA type of story
GTA Vice City: "Yeah you are on the right track."
@@laptoprelaks Honestly, I'd pay double to play the version they showed on their deep dive videos.
8 months in they havent added and changed nearly the amount they promised they would. I am not even talking about release debacle here, but their post-release promises.
Us: give us a full game
Them: we can do a jacket lol 😂
I have NEVER understood nerfing something in a single player role-playing game.
They sat at the desk and were like , you know what these shitfest game needs ,to make it less fun duuh , less money , lesss dmg and remove that hyperspeed exploit and force people to deal with our shitty ineffective diving
@@guotyr2502 Go play something else instead of complaining then?
@@viewaskew7741 Nope. We payed for it, promises were made, not kept and now are making it harder to play and less rewarding. We are entitle to complain.
@@viewaskew7741 i mean when we spent our money buying the game, we have every right to complain, dont we??
@@viewaskew7741 if you ordered a burger and it came to you uncooked wouldn't you complain? When you pay for something and arent given what was promised you have the right to be upset.
It really feels like a group of 5 people tried to make a AAA game and failed horribly. And now they have hired maybe another 5 to come in a help fix it.
Cars no longer smashing into the wall one after the other in that one spot? Ha, I was waiting for this one! I almost can't believe it!
3:20 "you'll become invisible"
*npc turns to see you*