OWC Jellyfish Studio Fast, Massive Desktop NAS Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ก.ย. 2024
  • ► Read more: www.cined.com/...
    During IBC 2024, OWC showcased Jellyfish Studio, a fast, large, and configurable NAS solution optimized for high-performance studios and production houses. It offers a rather unique, streamlined experience requiring no servers or switching, no IT person, just plug-and-play. With impressive speed, capacity, connectivity, and ease of use the OWC Jellyfish Studio May just fulfill your media needs.
    --------------------------------------­­­­­­­----------------------------------­-­-­-­-­
    Links marked with a “*” are affiliate links - which means, CineD receives a percentage of the revenue made from purchasing products through this link.
    It won’t cost you any more to use these links.
    ---------------------------------------­­­­­­­----------------------------------­-­-­-­-­
    WATCH / LISTEN TO OUR WEEKLY 🎧 PODCAST "Focus Check":
    ➡ www.cined.com/...
    FOLLOW US:
    🎥 www.CineD.com - unbiased filmmaking tech reviews & news
    🧑🏻‍🏫 www.MZed.com - best online education for filmmakers & creators
    ➡ Subscribe to CineD on TH-cam | / cined
    ➡ Follow us on Instagram | / cinednews
    ➡ Follow us on Facebook | / cinednews
    ➡ Follow us on X (Twitter) | / cinednews

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @skymakai
    @skymakai 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    I have a love/hate relationship with OWC. On one hand my TB8 RAID enclosure and SoftRAID were fairly easy to set up and use... I really appreciate having a JBOD solution… on the other hand, the support and warranty is mediocre. With my warranty covered (1YR) TB8, I dealt with months of sending them error logs and they couldn't isolate the issue. It also has abhorrent noise levels making it impossible to use on or under desk (I have to route a 10' TB4 cable into a closet). They made me pay $100 UPS to send the unit to them for diagnosis and found nothing before shipping it back. They didn't replace it like they should have.

  • @CatalystReaction
    @CatalystReaction 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    what a huge oversight to not have this enclosure in a blade form factor where a set of fans can be used for cooling drives + cpu + hardware. Instead the drives are left to a basement caddy with no airflow

  • @jaimeduncan6167
    @jaimeduncan6167 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    For a small studio, the built-in switch is a massive advantage so for portable use. But for the price, I am not sure that it's worth it against a far more open solution from QNAP like the TS-h1290FX that can use SATA or u.2 drives (you can add up to 1TB of RAM and 732TB of pure NVME storage and 3 25Gbit ethernet ports with link aggregation) .OWC needs to be more transparent abut the technology, but maybe there is a good reason not to do it.

  • @VIDTOOLZ
    @VIDTOOLZ 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Good interview👍 Thank you!

  • @waveland
    @waveland 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Excellent interview. Thank you.

  • @LibbieAddair-w4i
    @LibbieAddair-w4i 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Schiller Falls

  • @maniacaudiophile
    @maniacaudiophile 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Holy crap I never seen so much fluff come out one single person

  • @Nick_Lavigne
    @Nick_Lavigne 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Founder? Owc is from 1988 was he 12.

  • @attainconsult
    @attainconsult 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    still even talking harward raid? zfs is hands down better in so many ways speed, recovery, snapshots, syncing to another systems ...

  • @FharishAhmedPortfolio
    @FharishAhmedPortfolio 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    😮😮😮

  • @awesomearizona-dino
    @awesomearizona-dino 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Crazy high priced solutions- for wealthy u-tubers with too much money.

    • @V1N_574
      @V1N_574 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      There's something for ever group out there. One of my NAS is an HP computer that someone throwed to the trash and I saw it on my way to work 😂😂😂😂

  • @gfgfg-m5s
    @gfgfg-m5s 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Kovacek Meadow