Specialising vs All-Rounding In Cubing (feat. Luke Burns, Harvie Partridge and Jake Brown)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • "Partridge" in title so time for infinite views
    Luke Burns: 04:43
    Harvie Partridge: 07:19
    Jake Brown: 09:50

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @noahswor
    @noahswor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    one thing that people don't really mention when talking about this is that all rounders HAVE to be really good specialists as well
    If you look at any of the top all rounders, almost every one is at the worst top20 or 30 in one event in the world. You need to learn how to be really good in one thing to transfer that ability to get good to other events. almost every all rounder starts by getting really good at one event, or practices something much more in particular while generally improving in everything else. This is why most all rounders don't really actively make the choice of all rounding, but rather become good all rounders through enjoying most/all events and having the skill set to get good.
    You can specialize without all rounding, but you can't really all round without specializing.

    • @anderscubes
      @anderscubes 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this is so true

    • @brandiepop
      @brandiepop 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yeah, if you look at most top solvers in any event they are almost all sub 10 on 3x3 even with non 3x3 related events like squan, skewb, pyra etc and most top 3x3 solvers are still good at other events as they enjoy cubing not just 3x3 and once you get really good at one event its easier to get good at other and vice versa

    • @Citruscuber
      @Citruscuber 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah I consider myself an alright All rounder but I specialize 2x2

  • @seankim2916
    @seankim2916 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    the trick to allrounding is usually not actually being good at everything at once but just specializing untill you get to a certain point and then moving on.

  • @PieceByPiece1046
    @PieceByPiece1046 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Thanks for having me on!

  • @nikmrn
    @nikmrn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I have done it like this over the last few years: get a puzzle, pracitce it to NR100 and then never touch it again
    Now I only do 3x3 and sometimes 4x4

  • @genevad4754
    @genevad4754 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I specialize in getting below average times all around

  • @tyronium2
    @tyronium2 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    i tend to specialize in events until i am happy with my results then switch events

    • @skwebjacob
      @skwebjacob 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      i tend to specialize and never switch

    • @TheShiGuyShiloh
      @TheShiGuyShiloh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Relatable

  • @curiousNic
    @curiousNic 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting to hear the different perspectives. There are pros and cons to everything. For me the fun factor is most important. In the limited time I have to pratice I usually focus on the events I enjoy the most.

  • @benhitz9685
    @benhitz9685 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I feel specializing in a couple similar events is often the most fun, because it gives you advantages of both categories. i say this as someone who is an all-rounder.

  • @neicu34
    @neicu34 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    nice video

  • @cariyaputta
    @cariyaputta 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For place with only one or two comps per year being all rounder is nearly a must. At least specialize in one event and get all other to a decent level for the cut off.

  • @solver5k
    @solver5k 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting topic. I've definitely focused on most all of the events so far and not specialized in any particular event. :)

  • @Anthony_Jiang
    @Anthony_Jiang 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Me being an oh specialist be like.

  • @Pomni740
    @Pomni740 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tommy Cherry is both he is the best in the world at clock and 3 bld and he is also world class in every event.

  • @NoahWRizz
    @NoahWRizz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very good video, do you have an Instagram by the way?