Explanation is very easy to understand. And best part of lectures is short recap. Short recap is necessary to brush up the things which we have learned. Thanks.
Everything is clear, except for the most important two points: why is the linkage N = x^2/r^2? I am trying to figure why this is for a long time, and still not successful. Can you shine some light on this topic? Also, in your derivation you assume that the total flux through the area of girth dx comes from the current from the center to the point x. But really, that flux comes from any cylinder of radius tau, where tau = 0:x. So maybe those should be added together or something?? I saw similar derivations elsewhere, and all of them lacked fundamental explanations. The end result may be correct, but the reasoning is flawed. I was hoping to run into a flawless explanation
I have the same difficulty. My instinct tells me that deriving a formula for a straight conductor from one for a coil is very awkward (it's not the fault of this teacher of course). It should be the other way round.
Same problem here, it seems to me that this topic, as well as all the inductance calculation of transmission lines are always missing some crucial step to make them intuistive. Maybe the genius which figured it out was a lousy teacher and no one in the world can really envision it, so everybody just learns the derivation their book told them was right. Maybe its all wrong, has anyone even tried to measure this? I really don't know, it could all be a useless theoretical exercise.
Best explanation of this topic I have watched till now
Explanation is very easy to understand. And best part of lectures is short recap. Short recap is necessary to brush up the things which we have learned.
Thanks.
Everything is clear, except for the most important two points: why is the linkage N = x^2/r^2? I am trying to figure why this is for a long time, and still not successful. Can you shine some light on this topic?
Also, in your derivation you assume that the total flux through the area of girth dx comes from the current from the center to the point x. But really, that flux comes from any cylinder of radius tau, where tau = 0:x. So maybe those should be added together or something??
I saw similar derivations elsewhere, and all of them lacked fundamental explanations. The end result may be correct, but the reasoning is flawed. I was hoping to run into a flawless explanation
in the denom u have to take total current and the num considers the current that is actually linking with with certain portion of the conductor
I have the same difficulty. My instinct tells me that deriving a formula for a straight conductor from one for a coil is very awkward (it's not the fault of this teacher of course). It should be the other way round.
I hvae the same difficulty....how can the number of turns be fractional?
Same problem here, it seems to me that this topic, as well as all the inductance calculation of transmission lines are always missing some crucial step to make them intuistive. Maybe the genius which figured it out was a lousy teacher and no one in the world can really envision it, so everybody just learns the derivation their book told them was right. Maybe its all wrong, has anyone even tried to measure this? I really don't know, it could all be a useless theoretical exercise.
You literally answered all my questions in such a short video, many thanks.
Tnx bro..you made this topic so simple.
Thank you for your explanation. The best I have ever seen. Your sketchs helps a lot.
One of the greatest lecture with crystal clear concept and teaching quality is high.
Interesting explanation bhai
You are the best explaner ever
The best explanation
You sir is the best teacher. Thank you for sharing your knowledge to us and i hope that God will give you more power and knowledge
Top notch A+. Keep up the excellent work.
Excellent explanation!!
Very Good explanation!!!
sir you will be a billionaire if you become a professional teacher. I have never seen a teacher so good
thank you very much for your effort and time .
please upload capacitance vedios
thank you very much
Very nice kindly upload more power systems topics
As the number of turns has no unit, the unit of lamda_int at the end also should be Wb/m rather than Wb*t/m, other than that it's a nice explanation!
Please upload more videos
Question-how can the inductance due to internal flux be independent of the radius of the conductor ‘r’?
the external magnetic field does not link the conductor, then why we consider it in calculating total inductance of a conductor?
why not only internal inductance is considered total inductance?
dude couple of mistakes.. B is not intensity it is density and H is intensity
thank you so much