Distributive Justice

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ม.ค. 2024
  • On the debate between Rawls, Nozick, Dworkin, Cohen on the concepts of distributive justice in political theory.
    *English TH-cam: / taimurrahman1975
    *Instagram: / taimur_laal
    *Twitter: / taimur_laal

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @MohsinKhan-io9gm
    @MohsinKhan-io9gm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I am enthusiastic to listen to you sir❤️❤️

  • @muaz4825
    @muaz4825 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sir you are an assest to this nation

  • @umairsheikh8985
    @umairsheikh8985 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Keep it up sir

  • @buddakutta4003
    @buddakutta4003 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rawls's book is in my BTR, yet remains untouched owing to its voluminous nature. Gratitude for your insightful lecture.

  • @abdulqayyum4721
    @abdulqayyum4721 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kindly look at Keynesian economics also.

  • @islamichistory7849
    @islamichistory7849 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir kindly make the video of political systems of Almond and David Easton

  • @nowie4007
    @nowie4007 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤

  • @Babasayee
    @Babasayee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hardship humble and positive wealth skills Health sounds thanks and deliver the benefit's to others or natural ways to nature

  • @Babasayee
    @Babasayee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We inshallah make videos on is important mater's

  • @jamilkhan715
    @jamilkhan715 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    سورتہ الماعون کی آخری آیت کے بارے آپ کا کیا خیال ہے جو عام برتنے کی اشیاء کا ذکر کرتاہے کہ ایک دوسرے کو دیا کریں.
    پروفیسر صاحب آپ کی بہت عمیق باتوں کا شکریہ. آپ ایک ان پڑھ معاشرے میں رہ رہے ہیں. شاید کہ اتر جائے ہمارے دل میں آپ کی بات.

  • @Babasayee
    @Babasayee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can't be equal some is waste the right but the delivery take good care of them who depends on the wealthy people who stay safe from wealth is should be honest humanity restore is easy trail with deeper

  • @anarkali_217
    @anarkali_217 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ur time is valuable the lectures are free but why not make patreon one hour in a week. where people can ask u quesitons? i know free is best :P but sill just a thought.

  • @MuhammadAbdullah-ky6jj
    @MuhammadAbdullah-ky6jj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but what i understand of Cohan's arguments is that if a person has a property (any privately owned asset), others should be entitled to use it as long as they do not hinder the use of the property by the owner, But in the real world, how do you ensure that the usage of the property by one person does not hinder the owners'. And also, what is to be done by person A (owner of the property) in case person B (borrower of the property) damages the property during usage? And one last thing that I'd like you to shed light upon is that, is this entitlement to use others' property applicable on all sorts of assets or is it limited to predefined categories/classes of property? And if so, how do we distinguish between distributable and non-distributable properties? (Because to be honest with you, I wouldn't be comfortable sharing my clothes, especially undergarments, with others on a daily basis🙃) .If you could kindly elaborate on these points, it would be of great help to me!

    • @Taimur_Laal
      @Taimur_Laal  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      1. You have misunderstood Cohen’s argument. You are still thinking in terms of ownership. Cohen is talking about socialised property. No one owns it. It is used collectively. He argues that the realm of freedom is actually expanded in such an instance. And this proves the liberal assumption that freedom can only be extended by honouring private property to be entirely incorrect.
      2. The mechanism by misuse of collective property would be redressed would obviously depend on the collective but one can assume that the individual that misuses it, has to pay for the damage.
      3. Cohen is mainly interested in the commanding heights of the economy. He’s not interested in socialising your tooth brush. He is talking about finance, land, heavy industry, transport, communication etc.

    • @MuhammadAbdullah-ky6jj
      @MuhammadAbdullah-ky6jj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks

  • @Babasayee
    @Babasayee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Struggle and Gain is different is minds or heart's wishes as being normal person and some struggle with minds open and idea 💡🙏 for being wealthy God open the thought being some time Bond like truth and justice ⚖️ sounds with ❤️🌹 mostly important people

  • @anarkali_217
    @anarkali_217 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cohen mostly did just criticize the other systems. What will the marxist system look like and solve the issues that is not abvious after watching ur videos. And one hears often that yes capitalism is not an ideal system but it works better than other systems. Communism eventually failed Russia, look at the situation of freedoms in China. Communism feels like utopian thinking. Not practical. In any case i hope u will give solutions using cohen or other newer methods to create a just and equal system. And what about islam ? people in pakistan think islam will solve the system.Ignoring human condition has changed. What will applicaiton of islamic principles of chartiy result in if implemeted now and its criticism ?