Mate your podcast is so unique! You’ve found a niche spot in the podcast world. It’s so good to listen to you and your guests just chat about the features that mainstream archeologists just gloss over. The smoking gun evidence that is indisputably from a global lost civilisation using a technology that we just can’t even grasp! Keep up the great work! 👏👏👏
2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1
Thank you! I think this is the best comment I ever got so far. Cheers!
So amazing and bizarre. Well done sir. I've been using Chris King headsets since 2006. This is the last context I would expect to be introduced to the man behind the headset. It makes perfect sense and what a fantastic podcast debut
I had one headset it was really expensive lol.… And buy out of sheer luck. I recovered a stolen bicycle from someone that had stolen it, and never had a chance to return the bicycle to the guy that belong to. It also had a Chris King on it.…
in places where polygonal walls have separated due to earthquake damage, we can see that the blocks perfectly mate not only at the exterior but throughout the depth of the mating surfaces, even curving three dimensionally. this CANNOT have been accomplished using hand tools alone--otherwise we are invoking having to move every stone 100s of times in order to trial-and-error fit it onto the adjoining blocks.
@@GroberWeisenstein because the stones curve three dimensionally in all directions, the blocks are not rectangles and squares that simply curve in 2D, they curve in 3D.
@AustinKoleCarlisle 3d is simply an additional plane to template. Thing is the backs and faces don't require fitting to adjacent stones. Only the sides need to be fitted. Even then, the sides can be crudely worked just to remove high spots along their shared plane. The edges are beveled or arrised to exaggerate a clean precise fit. Shadows add to the illusion. Bedding planes are mostly all parallel which is the typical case with ashlar style masonry. The parallel beds create a reference line.
@@GroberWeisenstein if it was so easy to figure out like you are claiming, then so many cultures all over the world wouldn't have forgotten how to build walls in this way.
@AustinKoleCarlisle we haven't. These methods are still used by building stone masons and memorial masons today. The difference today is an advancement in design and processing technologies which creates more yield instead using all the block for just its face coverage. Stone is now usually hung as curtainwall design or double wall construction with CMU block or concrete as structural backing.
If you read the Pharos pump book/ research the basalt composition makes sense for color, density, etc. The pyramid was covered in white stone so the contrast and non conductive properties of basalt would be necessary. Also when you think about time frame you always have to consider who wrote the history and toss it out the window. If you have no facts in history then you must revaluate the evidence as it stands. History is only a guideline.
I don’t think the ancients used advanced methods BECAUSE it was easy, I think they used their advanced methods to create very specific designs and solutions which we simply do not understand WHY they made things the way they did. The stones that “wrap” around inside corners were obviously done so likely for a reason like structural stability for earthquake resistance and/or acoustic wave requirements (for example), rather than “looks”.
If a farmer left machinery in a field for 10000 years there would be nothing left you recognise, there are large pits of metal dust scattered around Egypt that need investigation. You can tell by the patches of discolouration too start with.
53:34 it was built with larger blocks and then cut the exces{just like piramid faces} on the inside, making that complex pattern. 1:03:50 well you explained it your self :D
I think we can do away with these outdated assumptions that they didn’t have metals other than copper to work on the pyramids. There’s no way they used copper tubes with ~2mil thick walls to cut deep core drills with those tight tolerances and consistency. There’s also no way they milled out “sarcophagi” using copper either.
just runnubg in circles, stay with facts and deduce from that
2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2
Thanks for the profound insight! Just a heads-up, this is a podcast, not a scientific dissertation. Running in circles is part of the fun, especially when mainstream "facts" often miss the mark. But don't worry, we'll be sure to stay in our lane and stick to your narrowly defined version of reality. Appreciate the lecture!
Technologies, sounds of more than technology, there is only two possibilities, either it is technology, or it is Not technology. Well, it is Not about technology, but about Ability. So, what is our First Ability, our First Ability, is Thinking, the Day-Consciousness. So, now, it is about to Think Outside the 'Stone-Box', Pyramid, and all the extra ordinairy constructions, were made 86.000 years ago, by Highly Developed Real Humans, High Voltage Beings, Not to shake hands with. They de-materialized the Rocks, projected the atoms, and materialized the Ideas, Solely by Thought-Power. There is only few data, and not any details, at the moment, but it is a Blind-Gate, to continue the orthodox thinking, about tools and advanced techology.
Do you think they used stone softening techniques to build the great pyramid?
3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2
The topic of stone softening technique usually comes up regarding the polygonal masonry, the same like in peru etc. The blocks in the Great Pyramid are not polygonal, not even the king`s chamber`s granite blocks. The Great Pyramid will be a topic of a long episode and I am planning on discussing the different theories regarding the function of the structure.
Thanks for your response! I still think the Great Pyramid of Egypt was some sort of a power plant possibly that was driven by the arc of the covenant. I don't think what we're seeing remotely resembles what it used to look like. Who knows? It's still quite a marvel.
3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4
@@robertamaral2349 We can speculate for eternity (I like it, though), but the main thing that matters, in my opinion, is that the "tomb" function is becoming ridiculous in academic circles too. I think the best thing that could happen to these sites in decades was the beginning of the Scan Pyramids project. Those guys are doing proper research, investigation, and mapping of these sites. I really hope that one day I can join them and help figure out what was really going on in Egypt.
I agree regarding the Tomb function, what a joke! Scanning the pyramids sounds very intriguing. I hope it happens!
3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3
@@robertamaral2349 Its already happening!!! The Scan Pyramids team discovered the "big void" in the Great Pyramid, above the Grand Gallery back in 2017. When I was in Egypt this March, they were working on the Queens Chamber and also around the Menkaure Pyramid. Those guys are legends!!!
hahaha !!!flat earth??? if you had paid attention to either video you would realise that its not,, one is a ancient civilization denier and MR POKA here is clearly trying to understand it all with an open mind like the rest off us!
Ah, the wisdom of the internet critic AGAIN! Thanks for the input. If you're finding it boring, maybe it's because we're delving into real discoveries rather than spoon-feeding you the same old tired narratives. Feel free to tune out and find something more aligned with your "expert" tastes. Cheers!
salty comments can contain more truth than sugared ones. You have great potential to grow your channel and ask a lot of intelligent questions. Better guests will come, and getting the essentials from them will take some time to figure out. Consider it ruder when people only tell you what you want to hear.
Mate your podcast is so unique! You’ve found a niche spot in the podcast world. It’s so good to listen to you and your guests just chat about the features that mainstream archeologists just gloss over. The smoking gun evidence that is indisputably from a global lost civilisation using a technology that we just can’t even grasp! Keep up the great work! 👏👏👏
Thank you! I think this is the best comment I ever got so far. Cheers!
So amazing and bizarre. Well done sir. I've been using Chris King headsets since 2006. This is the last context I would expect to be introduced to the man behind the headset. It makes perfect sense and what a fantastic podcast debut
@@Bizarreparade thanks a million! 🙏
I had one headset it was really expensive lol.… And buy out of sheer luck. I recovered a stolen bicycle from someone that had stolen it, and never had a chance to return the bicycle to the guy that belong to. It also had a Chris King on it.…
I only made it 20 minutes. I don’t know what’s going on. I don’t know what they’re talking about or what it pertains to you.… Shocks.
Good stuff. Great to see more pods on this topic! Keep it up
Thanks a million!
the bedrock mating with the foundation slabs is mind blowing
oooh that Chris King!
My grandfather was the engineer that designed the cement components of the Hoover dam.
That is so cool! Thanks for sharing!
looks like basalt slab bottoms was softened and placed on top of the limestone to make a perfect fit, only the sides of the blocks was cut/made flat.
in places where polygonal walls have separated due to earthquake damage, we can see that the blocks perfectly mate not only at the exterior but throughout the depth of the mating surfaces, even curving three dimensionally. this CANNOT have been accomplished using hand tools alone--otherwise we are invoking having to move every stone 100s of times in order to trial-and-error fit it onto the adjoining blocks.
Why would you reposition the stones when a simple template can be made to transfer to the other stone to match the profile shape?
@@GroberWeisenstein because the stones curve three dimensionally in all directions, the blocks are not rectangles and squares that simply curve in 2D, they curve in 3D.
@AustinKoleCarlisle 3d is simply an additional plane to template. Thing is the backs and faces don't require fitting to adjacent stones. Only the sides need to be fitted. Even then, the sides can be crudely worked just to remove high spots along their shared plane. The edges are beveled or arrised to exaggerate a clean precise fit. Shadows add to the illusion. Bedding planes are mostly all parallel which is the typical case with ashlar style masonry. The parallel beds create a reference line.
@@GroberWeisenstein if it was so easy to figure out like you are claiming, then so many cultures all over the world wouldn't have forgotten how to build walls in this way.
@AustinKoleCarlisle we haven't. These methods are still used by building stone masons and memorial masons today. The difference today is an advancement in design and processing technologies which creates more yield instead using all the block for just its face coverage. Stone is now usually hung as curtainwall design or double wall construction with CMU block or concrete as structural backing.
Not sure what your native language is, but your doing amazing. Love this content.
Thank you! I am Hungarian
Great channel! You have a new subscriber
@@ArizonaHurley thanks a million! 🙏
OK guys, Chris King I love you man, but we have talked about what you do for long enough you know how to run a lath Really good check
If you read the Pharos pump book/ research the basalt composition makes sense for color, density, etc. The pyramid was covered in white stone so the contrast and non conductive properties of basalt would be necessary. Also when you think about time frame you always have to consider who wrote the history and toss it out the window. If you have no facts in history then you must revaluate the evidence as it stands. History is only a guideline.
I don’t think the ancients used advanced methods BECAUSE it was easy, I think they used their advanced methods to create very specific designs and solutions which we simply do not understand WHY they made things the way they did. The stones that “wrap” around inside corners were obviously done so likely for a reason like structural stability for earthquake resistance and/or acoustic wave requirements (for example), rather than “looks”.
If a farmer left machinery in a field for 10000 years there would be nothing left you recognise, there are large pits of metal dust scattered around Egypt that need investigation. You can tell by the patches of discolouration too start with.
There was an asteroid strike around 3000 bce, look up Columbia University researcher.
Burckle Crater?
Chris is a product of the aerospace industry completely taken a dive. I think it was the 90s. Yeah it was a 90s.
53:34 it was built with larger blocks and then cut the exces{just like piramid faces} on the inside, making that complex pattern. 1:03:50 well you explained it your self :D
I think we can do away with these outdated assumptions that they didn’t have metals other than copper to work on the pyramids. There’s no way they used copper tubes with ~2mil thick walls to cut deep core drills with those tight tolerances and consistency. There’s also no way they milled out “sarcophagi” using copper either.
Th Land of Chem channel explains everything about pyramids.
just runnubg in circles, stay with facts and deduce from that
Thanks for the profound insight! Just a heads-up, this is a podcast, not a scientific dissertation. Running in circles is part of the fun, especially when mainstream "facts" often miss the mark. But don't worry, we'll be sure to stay in our lane and stick to your narrowly defined version of reality. Appreciate the lecture!
We graphity our churches and temples, we do not when it's a power station or a building that is not used for worship !
Holy smokes guy has a bunch of my money.… Hey Chris King
There is an unnatural amount of rust in the soil around giza plateau. This is in line with decomposed machinery
or natural iron oxide veins?
we have also seen the iron oxide in the underground shafts in the form of veins
Technologies, sounds of more than technology,
there is only two possibilities, either it is technology,
or it is Not technology.
Well, it is Not about technology, but about Ability.
So, what is our First Ability,
our First Ability, is Thinking, the Day-Consciousness.
So, now, it is about to Think Outside the 'Stone-Box',
Pyramid, and all the extra ordinairy constructions,
were made 86.000 years ago, by Highly Developed
Real Humans, High Voltage Beings, Not to shake hands with.
They de-materialized the Rocks, projected the atoms,
and materialized the Ideas, Solely by Thought-Power.
There is only few data, and not any details, at the moment,
but it is a Blind-Gate, to continue the orthodox thinking,
about tools and advanced techology.
They did all those stuff because it was easy for them, for us today it would be hard...😂😂
Do you think they used stone softening techniques to build the great pyramid?
The topic of stone softening technique usually comes up regarding the polygonal masonry, the same like in peru etc. The blocks in the Great Pyramid are not polygonal, not even the king`s chamber`s granite blocks. The Great Pyramid will be a topic of a long episode and I am planning on discussing the different theories regarding the function of the structure.
Thanks for your response! I still think the Great Pyramid of Egypt was some sort of a power plant possibly that was driven by the arc of the covenant. I don't think what we're seeing remotely resembles what it used to look like. Who knows? It's still quite a marvel.
@@robertamaral2349 We can speculate for eternity (I like it, though), but the main thing that matters, in my opinion, is that the "tomb" function is becoming ridiculous in academic circles too. I think the best thing that could happen to these sites in decades was the beginning of the Scan Pyramids project. Those guys are doing proper research, investigation, and mapping of these sites. I really hope that one day I can join them and help figure out what was really going on in Egypt.
I agree regarding the Tomb function, what a joke! Scanning the pyramids sounds very intriguing. I hope it happens!
@@robertamaral2349 Its already happening!!! The Scan Pyramids team discovered the "big void" in the Great Pyramid, above the Grand Gallery back in 2017. When I was in Egypt this March, they were working on the Queens Chamber and also around the Menkaure Pyramid. Those guys are legends!!!
Are you the guy that was on Joe Rogan?
No, unfortunately I was not on his show (yet?) 😂
hahaha !!!flat earth??? if you had paid attention to either video you would realise that its not,, one is a ancient civilization denier and MR POKA here is clearly trying to understand it all with an open mind like the rest off us!
@@chrislynn8689 What?
There was a guy that looks like you, same hat, talking about Egyptiam pyramids. Doppelganger.
Maybe Flint Dibble? He is the only one I know was in hat talking about archeology stuff🤔
no good detail photos
no good english
Used powered saws and hydrolic jacks to build pyramids, easy cheesy 🤪
boring guy, even more than Dunn. no real info
Ah, the wisdom of the internet critic AGAIN! Thanks for the input. If you're finding it boring, maybe it's because we're delving into real discoveries rather than spoon-feeding you the same old tired narratives. Feel free to tune out and find something more aligned with your "expert" tastes. Cheers!
salty comments can contain more truth than sugared ones. You have great potential to grow your channel and ask a lot of intelligent questions. Better guests will come, and getting the essentials from them will take some time to figure out. Consider it ruder when people only tell you what you want to hear.
Hating ancient aliens is willful ignorance
Thanks but I am not talking about ancient aliens 😂
but you did. You just don't want to defend that now. I see how you are.